DOCSLIB.ORG

Of Living and Fossil Echinoids 1971-2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

©Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, Serie A 112 195-470 Wien, Juni 2010 Index of Living and Fossil Echinoids 1971-2008 By Andreas KROH1 Manuscript submitted on November 20th 2009, the revised manuscript on January 21st 2010 Abstract All new taxa of fossil and living echinoids described from 1971 to 2008 are listed with their age, geographic and stratigraphic occurrence, repository of type material and bibliographic citation. Keywords: Echinodermata, Echinoidea, bibliography, species list, type material. Introduction Comprehensive listings of living and fossil echinoids for the species and genera estab- lished before 1970 were published by LAMBERT & THIÉRY (1909-25) and KIER & LAWSON (1978) respectively. KIER & LAWSON’s supplement for the years 1971-75 to their “Index of Living and Fossil Echinoids 1924-1970” has never been published. More than thirty years have passed since the latter publication and although the advent of information technology and the internet has made taxonomic research much easier, a comprehensive, up-to-date resource for echinoid species is still missing. At genus-level though, echinoids are de- scribed in detail in Andrew SMITH’s Echinoid Directory (http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research- curation/research/projects/echinoid-directory/index.html), an indispensible resource for anyone working with this group. This list was prepared utilizing a variety of resources, printed and online. The bulk of taxa was located by culling the current echinoderm literature for new taxa and by cross check- ing this list with the Zoological Record. Citations before 1971 are included if they were absent in LAMBERT & THIÉRY (1909-25) and KIER & LAWSON (1978). In every case the original paper was consulted and checked for species that might have been missed. Where possible, information on the type material and its repository has been included in this index. No attempt has been made to revise the taxonomic assignment of the species. This index strictly follows the classification of the Treatise on Invertebrate Paleon- tology, even where I disagree with it. Higher-level taxa are also included in this index. 1 Natural History Museum Vienna, Department of Geology & Palaeontology, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Aus- tria; e-mail: [email protected] ©Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at 196 Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, Serie A 112 Information in this index is presented in the following way: Family Name AUTHOR, Date Genus Name AUTHOR, Date Time horizon G. species AUTHOR, Date: pages-pages; fig. x; pl. x: figs x-x. [Formation Fm., Local- ity, Region, Country] (Geological age) <HT(Holotype): AbbreViated InstitU- TION Specimen No.; PT(Paratype/s): ABBREVIATED INSTITUTION Specimen No.> {remarks}. Acknowledgements Special thanks to Mike REICH, Loïc VILLIER, and the librarians Andrea KOURGLI, Wolfgang BRUNN- BAUER and Helga SCHMITZ for their help in locating even the most obscure papers. Johanna KO- VAR-EDER, Inesa VISLOBOKOVA, and Oleg MANDIC helped translating Russian papers. Wenyu WU provided translations of Chinese texts. Stephen K. DONOVAN, John W.M. JAGT, Mathias HARZHAUSER, Gudrun HÖCK, Christine LATAL, Kenneth MCNAMARA, Rich MOOI, James H. NEBELSICK, Edeltraud PREIS, Werner E. PILLER, Ortwin SCHULTZ, Andrew B. SMITH, Herbert SUMMESBERGER, and numerous other persons helped in various ways during the preparation of this paper. This research was supported by the Austrian Science Foundation, project No. P-14366-Bio to Werner E. PIllER (University of Graz) and the SYNTHESYS Project (http://www.synthesys. info/) which is financed by European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP 6 “Structuring the European Research Area” Programme. Abbreviations HT: Holotype PT: Paratype/s LT: Lectotype PLT: Paralectotype/s ST: Syntype/s NT: Neotype Collections: AM Australian Museum, Sydney, Australia AMNH American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA ANSP Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA ANU Department of Geology, Australian National University, Canberra ©Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at KROH: Index of Living and Fossil Echinoids 1971-2008 197 ASU-GM Ain Shams University, Geological Museum, Egypt AU Auckland University, New Zealand AUGD Adelaide Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Adelaide, Australia AzINEFTEKHIM Azerbeijan Institute of Gas and Oil Chemistry, Azerbeijan AZIOC Azerbaijan Institute of Oil Chemistry, Baku, Azerbaijan BAS British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK BEG Texas Bureau of Economic Geology, Texas, USA (collections held by the TMM Nonvertebrate Paleontology Laboratory, see TMM) BFU Brigham Young University Repository, Provo, Utah, USA BGS GSM British Geological Survey, Geological Survey Museum, UK BMNH British Museum of Natural History, London, UK BSPG Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und historische Geologie, München, Germany BSIP Museum, Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotany, Lucknow, India CASG California Academy of Sciences geology collection, San Fran- cisco, USA C-EM Collection COTTEAU, today included in the collection of the Ecole des Mines, Paris, France CFP Institut des Sciences de la Terre, Université de Dijon, Dijon, France CGM Central Geological Museum F.N.Chernysheva [Chernyshov], Leningrad [today Saint Petersburg], Russia CGCPE Colección del Grupo Cultural Paleontológico de Elche y del Museo de Paleontología de Elche, Spain CGS Museum of the Central Geological Survey, Republic of China CGST Central Geological Survey, Taipei, Taiwan CM Canterbury Museum, New Zealand CNIGR F.N. Chernyshev Central Research Geological Museum, Saint Petersburg, Russia CPBA Cátedra de Paleontología de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales de la Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentine CPC Palaeontological Collection, Bureau of Mineral Resourches, Canaberra, Australia CPUC Colecciones Paleontológicas, Unicersidad de Concepción, Chile CWUS Collection Westlake, University of Southampton, UK ©Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at 198 Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, Serie A 112 DGM do DNPM Divisão de Geologia e Mineralogia do Departamento Nacional da Produção Mineral, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil DGUL Museum, Department of Geology, University of Lucknow, Luck- now, India DNSM Durban Natural Science Museum, Durban, South Africa DPUW Department of Paleontology, Faculty of Geology, University of Warsaw, Poland ECG Escuela Centroamericana Geología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica EGSG Department of Earth Sciences (Geology), Universities of Perugia (Italy) and Alicante (Spain) [as in the original publication] EM Ecole des Mines, Paris, France FCDP Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Paleontología, Monte- video, Uruguay FGWG FR Geowissenschaften, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greif- swald, Germany FPH Fundação Paleontológica Phoenix, Aracaju, Brazil GHUNL-Pam Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de La Pampa, Argentinia GIH Geological Institute, Hungary GIUS Museum of Department of Earth Sciences, Silesian University, Poland GM-GDEMU Geological Museum of the Geology Department, Faculty of Science, El Mina University, Egypt GMM A.P. & M.V. Pavlov Geological Museum, Moskva, Russia GMUS Geological Museum of the University of Seville, Spain GPIH Geologisch-Paläontologisches Institut Hamburg, Germany GPIMUM Geologisch-Paläontologisches Institut und Museum, Univer- sität Münster, Münster, Germany GPIUB Geologisch-Paläontologisches Institut, Universität Bonn, Germany GPIUF Geologisch-Paläontologisches Institut der Universität Freiburg, Germany GSI Geological Survey of India, India GSJ Geological Survey of Japan, Tsukuba, Japan GSM Geological Survey Museum (now British Geological Survey), UK GSP Geological Survey Pretoria, South Africa GSWA Geological Survey of Western Australia, Perth, Australia ©Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at KROH: Index of Living and Fossil Echinoids 1971-2008 199 GU/R/KE Laboratory of Vertebrate Palaeontology, Department of Geology, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar (Garhwal), Uttaranchal, India HUJ Zoological Museum, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel IGEO Instituto de Geosciências da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil IGM Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City IGMCU Museo de Paleontología del Instituto de Geología, en la Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico IGN-ANURSR Institute of Geological Sciences, Academy of Sciences URSR, Kiev, Ukraine IGS Insitute of Geological Sciences, London, UK IGPUW Museum of the Faculty of Geology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland IGUFP Istituto de Geosciências da Universidade Federal de Pernam- buco, Brazil IGUFRJ Istituto de Geosciências da Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro, Brazil IIGA Instituto de Investigaciones Geológicas de Antofagasta, Chile IMBAS Institute of Marine Biology, Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia IMBFE Institute of Marine Biology, Far East Center, Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia IMGP-Gö Institut und Museum für Geologie und Paläontologie, Universität Göttingen, Germany IOANSSR Institute of Oceanography, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moskva IOAS Institute of Oceanology, Academia Sinica, Qingdao, China IORAS Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia IPM Institut de Paléontologie du Muséum, Paris, France IPPAS Institute of Paleobiology of the Polish Academy of Science, Warszawa,
Recommended publications
  • Download Full Article 1.7MB .Pdf File

    Download Full Article 1.7MB .Pdf File

    https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1934.8.08 September 1934 Mem. Nat. Mus. Vict., viii, 1934. THE CAINOZOIG CIDARIDAE OF AUSTRALIA. By Frederick Chapman, A.L.S., F.G.S., Commonwealth Palaeon- tologist, and Francis A. Cudmore, Hon. Palaeontologist, National Museum. Plates XII-XV. Nearly 60 years ago Professor P. M. Duncan described the first Australian Cainozoic cidaroid before the Geological Society of London. During the next 20 years Professors R. Tate and J. W. Gregory published references to our fossil cidaroids, but further descriptive work was not attempted until the present authors undertook to examine the accumulated material in the National Museum, the Tate Collection at Adelaide University Museum, the Commonwealth Palaeontological Collection, and the private collections made by the late Dr. T. S. Hall, F. A. Singleton, the Rev. Geo. Cox and the authors. The classification of the Cidaridae is founded mainly upon living species and it is partly based on structures which are only rarely preserved in fossils. Fossil cidaroid tests are usually imperfect. On abraded tests the conjugation of ambulacral pores is obscure. The apical system is preserved only in one specimen among those examined. The spines are rarely attached to the test and pedicellariae are wanting. Therefore, in dealing with our specimens we have been guided mainly by the appear- ance and structure of ambulacral and interambulacral areas. Certain features used in our classification vary with the growth stage of the test : for instance, the number of coronal plates in vertical series, the number of ambulacral plates adjacent to the largest coronal plate, and sometimes the number of granules on the inner end of ambulacral plates.
  • Taxonomía Y Biogeografía Ecológica De Los Equinoideos Irregulares (Echinoidea: Irregularia) De México

    Taxonomía Y Biogeografía Ecológica De Los Equinoideos Irregulares (Echinoidea: Irregularia) De México

    Taxonomía y biogeografía ecológica de los equinoideos irregulares (Echinoidea: Irregularia) de México Alejandra Martínez-Melo1, 2, Francisco Alonso Solís-Marín2, Blanca Estela Buitrón-Sánchez3 & Alfredo Laguarda-Figueras2 1. Posgrado de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología (PCML), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). México, D. F. 04510, México; [email protected] 2. Laboratorio de Sistemática y Ecología de Equinodermos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología (ICML), UNAM. Apdo. Post. 70-305, México, D. F. 04510, México; [email protected] 3. Departamento de Paleontología, Instituto de Geología (IG), UNAM, Cd. Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, México, D. F. 04510, México; [email protected] Recibido 04-VI-2014. Corregido 09-X-2014. Aceptado 04-XI-2014. Abstract: Taxonomy and ecologic biogeography of the irregular Echinoids (Echinoidea: Irregularia) from Mexico. Mexico owns 643 species of echinoderms, almost 10% of the known echinoderm species in the planet. Its geographic location -between the oceanic influences of the Western Central Atlantic and the Eastern Central Pacific- largely explains its enormous biological and ecological diversity. Research on echinoderms in Mexico began in the late nineteenth century; however, there are no reviews on its irregular echinoids. This work reviews the taxonomic and geographic information of irregular echinoids from Mexico, housed in four collections: 1) Colección Nacional de Equinodermos “Ma. Elena Caso Muñoz” from the Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología (ICML), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM); 2) Invertebrate Zoology Collection, Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C., United States of America (USA); 3) Invertebrate Collection, Museum of Comparative Zoology, University of Harvard, Boston, Massachusetts, USA and 4) Invertebrate Zoology, Peabody Museum, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • SI Appendix for Hopkins, Melanie J, and Smith, Andrew B

    SI Appendix for Hopkins, Melanie J, and Smith, Andrew B

    Hopkins and Smith, SI Appendix SI Appendix for Hopkins, Melanie J, and Smith, Andrew B. Dynamic evolutionary change in post-Paleozoic echinoids and the importance of scale when interpreting changes in rates of evolution. Corrections to character matrix Before running any analyses, we corrected a few errors in the published character matrix of Kroh and Smith (1). Specifically, we removed the three duplicate records of Oligopygus, Haimea, and Conoclypus, and removed characters C51 and C59, which had been excluded from the phylogenetic analysis but mistakenly remain in the matrix that was published in Appendix 2 of (1). We also excluded Anisocidaris, Paurocidaris, Pseudocidaris, Glyphopneustes, Enichaster, and Tiarechinus from the character matrix because these taxa were excluded from the strict consensus tree (1). This left 164 taxa and 303 characters for calculations of rates of evolution and for the principal coordinates analysis. Other tree scaling methods The most basic method for scaling a tree using first appearances of taxa is to make each internal node the age of its oldest descendent ("stand") (2), but this often results in many zero-length branches which are both theoretically questionable and in some cases methodologically problematic (3). Several methods exist for modifying zero-length branches. In the case of the results shown in Figure 1, we assigned a positive length to each zero-length branch by having it share time equally with a preceding, non-zero-length branch (“equal”) (4). However, we compared the results from this method of scaling to several other methods. First, we compared this with rates estimated from trees scaled such that zero-length branches share time proportionally to the amount of character change along the branches (“prop”) (5), a variation which gave almost identical results as the method used for the “equal” method (Fig.
  • The Panamic Biota: Some Observations Prior to a Sea-Level Canal

    The Panamic Biota: Some Observations Prior to a Sea-Level Canal

    Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington No. 2 THE PANAMIC BIOTA: SOME OBSERVATIONS PRIOR TO A SEA-LEVEL CANAL A Symposium Sponsored by The Biological Society of Washington The Conservation Foundation The National Museum of Natural History The Smithsonian Institution MEREDITH L. JONES, Editor September 28, 1972 CONTENTS Foreword The Editor - - - - - - - - - - Introduction Meredith L. Jones ____________ vi A Tribute to Waldo Lasalle Schmitt George A. Llano 1 Background for a New, Sea-Level, Panama Canal David Challinor - - - - - - - - - - - Observations on the Ecology of the Caribbean and Pacific Coasts of Panama - - - - Peter W. Glynn _ 13 Physical Characteristics of the Proposed Sea-Level Isthmian Canal John P. Sheffey - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 Exchange of Water through the Proposed Sea-Level Canal at Panama Donald R. F. Harleman - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 41 Biological Results of the University of Miami Deep-Sea Expeditions. 93. Comments Concerning the University of Miami's Marine Biological Survey Related to the Panamanian Sea-Level Canal Gilbert L. Voss - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 49 Museums as Environmental Data Banks: Curatorial Problems Posed by an Extensive Biological Survey Richard S. Cowan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 59 A Review of the Marine Plants of Panama Sylvia A. Earle - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 69 Ecology and Species Diversity of
  • Fossil Spatangoid Echinoids of Cuba

    Fossil Spatangoid Echinoids of Cuba

    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY • NUMBER 55 Fossil Spatangoid Echinoids of Cuba Porter M. Kier SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1984 ABSTRACT Kier, Porter M. Fossil Spatangoid Echinoids of Cuba. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, number 55, 336 pages, frontispiece, 45 figures, 90 plates, 6 tables, 1984.—The fossil spatangoid echinoids of Cuba are described based for the most part on specimens in the Sanchez Roig Collection. Seventy-nine species are recognized including 10 from the Late Cretaceous, 36 from the Eocene, 20 from the Oligocene-Miocene, 11 from the Miocene, and 2 of uncertain age. Three of the Eocene species are new: Schizas ter forme III, Linthia monteroae, and Antillaster albeari. A new genus of schizasterid is described, Caribbaster, with the Eocene Prenaster loveni Cotteau as the type-species. A new Asterostoma, A. pawsoni, is described from the Eocene of Jamaica. The Eocene age of the Cuban echinoid-bearing localities is confirmed by the presence outside Cuba of many ofthe same species in beds dated on other fossils. Some evidence supports the Miocene determinations, but the echinoids are of little assistance in resolving the question whether the Cuban beds attributed to the Oligocene are Oligocene or Miocene. Cuban, and in general, the Caribbean Tertiary echinoid faunas are distinct from those in Europe and the Mediterranean. Many genera are confined to the Caribbean. The Cuban fauna is also different from that found nearby in Florida. This difference may be due to a suggested greater depth of water in Cuba. Se describen los equinoideos espatangoideos de Cuba, incluyendo los es- pecimenes de la Coleccion Sanchez Roig.
  • Phylogenomic Analyses of Echinoid Diversification Prompt a Re

    Phylogenomic Analyses of Echinoid Diversification Prompt a Re

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.19.453013; this version posted August 4, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Phylogenomic analyses of echinoid diversification prompt a re- 2 evaluation of their fossil record 3 Short title: Phylogeny and diversification of sea urchins 4 5 Nicolás Mongiardino Koch1,2*, Jeffrey R Thompson3,4, Avery S Hatch2, Marina F McCowin2, A 6 Frances Armstrong5, Simon E Coppard6, Felipe Aguilera7, Omri Bronstein8,9, Andreas Kroh10, Rich 7 Mooi5, Greg W Rouse2 8 9 1 Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven CT, USA. 2 Scripps Institution of 10 Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla CA, USA. 3 Department of Earth Sciences, 11 Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, SW7 5BD London, UK. 4 University College London Center for 12 Life’s Origins and Evolution, London, UK. 5 Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Geology, California 13 Academy of Sciences, San Francisco CA, USA. 6 Bader International Study Centre, Queen's University, 14 Herstmonceux Castle, East Sussex, UK. 7 Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de 15 Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile. 8 School of Zoology, Faculty of Life 16 Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 9 Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel-Aviv, Israel. 10 17 Department of Geology and Palaeontology, Natural History Museum Vienna, Vienna, Austria 18 * Corresponding author.
  • For Peer Review

    For Peer Review

    Page 1 of 40 Geological Journal Page 1 of 32 1 2 3 Neogene echinoids from the Cayman Islands, West Indies: regional 4 5 6 implications 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 11 STEPHEN K. DONOVAN *, BRIAN JONES and DAVID A. T. HARPER 12 13 14 15 1Department of Geology, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, the Netherlands 16 17 2Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, T6G 2E3 18 For Peer Review 19 3 20 Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 *Correspondence to: S. K. Donovan, Department of Geology, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, 49 50 Darwinweg 2, 2333 CR Leiden, the Netherlands. 51 52 E-mail: [email protected] 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/gj Geological Journal Page 2 of 40 Page 2 of 32 1 2 3 The first fossil echinoids are recorded from the Cayman Islands. A regular echinoid, Arbacia? sp., the 4 5 spatangoids Brissus sp. cf. B. oblongus Wright and Schizaster sp. cf. S. americanus (Clark), and the 6 7 clypeasteroid Clypeaster sp. are from the Middle Miocene Cayman Formation. Test fragments of the 8 9 mellitid clypeasteroid, Leodia sexiesperforata (Leske), are from the Late Pleistocene Ironshore 10 11 Formation. Miocene echinoids are preserved as (mainly internal) moulds; hence, all species are left 12 13 14 in open nomenclature because of uncertainties regarding test architecture.
  • Biology Bulletin, 2020, Vol

    Biology Bulletin, 2020, Vol

    ISSN 1062-3590, Biology Bulletin, 2020, Vol. 47, No. 6, pp. 683–698. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2020. ECOLOGY Diversity of Antarctic Echinoids and Ecoregions of the Southern Ocean S. Fabri-Ruiza, b, *, N. Navarroa, c, **, R. Laffonta, ***, B. Danisb, ****, and T. Saucèdea, ***** aUMR 6282 Biogéosciences, CNRS, EPHE, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, 21000 France bMarine Biology Lab, Université Libre de Bruxelle, Brussels, 1050 Belgium cEPHE, PSL University, Paris, 75014 France *e-mail: [email protected] **e-mail: [email protected] ***e-mail: [email protected] ****e-mail: [email protected] *****e-mail: [email protected] Received February 26, 2020; revised May 5, 2020; accepted May 5, 2020 Abstract—Significant environmental changes have already been documented in the Southern Ocean (e.g. sea water temperature increase and salinity drop) but its marine life is still incompletely known given the hetero- geneous nature of biogeographic data. However, to establish sustainable conservation areas, understanding species and communities distribution patterns is critical. For this purpose, the ecoregionalization approach can prove useful by identifying spatially explicit and well-delimited regions of common species composition and environmental settings. Such regions are expected to have similar biotic responses to environmental changes and can be used to define priorities for the designation of Marine Protected Areas. In the present work, a benthic ecoregionalization of the Southern Ocean is proposed based on echinoids distribution data and abiotic environmental parameters. Echinoids are widely distributed in the Southern Ocean, they are tax- onomically and ecologically well diversified and documented. Given the heterogeneity of the sampling effort, predictive spatial models were produced to fill the gaps in between species distribution data.
  • Arbacia Lixula (Linnaeus, 1758)

    Arbacia Lixula (Linnaeus, 1758)

    Arbacia lixula (Linnaeus, 1758) AphiaID: 124249 OURIÇO-NEGRO Animalia (Reino) > Echinodermata (Filo) > Echinozoa (Subfilo) > Echinoidea (Classe) > Euechinoidea (Subclasse) > Carinacea (Infraclasse) > Echinacea (Superordem) > Arbacioida (Ordem) > Arbaciidae (Familia) Vasco Ferreira Vasco Ferreira Estatuto de Conservação Sinónimos Arbacia aequituberculata (Blainville, 1825) Arbacia australis Lovén, 1887 Arbacia grandinosa (Valenciennes, 1846) Arbacia pustulosa (Leske, 1778) Cidaris pustulosa Leske, 1778 Echinocidaris (Agarites) loculatua (Blainville, 1825) Echinocidaris (Tetrapygus) aequituberculatus (Blainville, 1825) Echinocidaris (Tetrapygus) grandinosa (Valenciennes, 1846) 1 Echinocidaris (Tetrapygus) pustulosa (Leske, 1778) Echinocidaris aequituberculata (Blainville, 1825) Echinocidaris grandinosa (Valenciennes, 1846) Echinocidaris loculatua (Blainville, 1825) Echinocidaris pustulosa (Leske, 1778) Echinus aequituberculatus Blainville, 1825 Echinus equituberculatus Blainville, 1825 Echinus grandinosus Valenciennes, 1846 Echinus lixula Linnaeus, 1758 Echinus loculatus Blainville, 1825 Echinus neapolitanus Delle Chiaje, 1825 Echinus pustulosus (Leske, 1778) Referências additional source Hayward, P.J.; Ryland, J.S. (Ed.). (1990). The marine fauna of the British Isles and North-West Europe: 1. Introduction and protozoans to arthropods. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK. ISBN 0-19-857356-1. 627 pp. [details] basis of record Hansson, H.G. (2001). Echinodermata, in: Costello, M.J. et al. (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list
  • The Carboniferous Evolution of Nova Scotia

    The Carboniferous Evolution of Nova Scotia

    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 27, 2021 The Carboniferous evolution of Nova Scotia J. H. CALDER Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources, PO Box 698, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 2T9 Abstract: Nova Scotia during the Carboniferous lay at the heart of palaeoequatorial Euramerica in a broadly intermontane palaeoequatorial setting, the Maritimes-West-European province; to the west rose the orographic barrier imposed by the Appalachian Mountains, and to the south and east the Mauritanide-Hercynide belt. The geological affinity of Nova Scotia to Europe, reflected in elements of the Carboniferous flora and fauna, was mirrored in the evolution of geological thought even before the epochal visits of Sir Charles Lyell. The Maritimes Basin of eastern Canada, born of the Acadian-Caledonian orogeny that witnessed the suture of Iapetus in the Devonian, and shaped thereafter by the inexorable closing of Gondwana and Laurasia, comprises a near complete stratal sequence as great as 12 km thick which spans the Middle Devonian to the Lower Permian. Across the southern Maritimes Basin, in northern Nova Scotia, deep depocentres developed en echelon adjacent to a transform platelet boundary between terranes of Avalon and Gondwanan affinity. The subsequent history of the basins can be summarized as distension and rifting attended by bimodal volcanism waning through the Dinantian, with marked transpression in the Namurian and subsequent persistence of transcurrent movement linking Variscan deformation with Mauritainide-Appalachian convergence and Alleghenian thrusting. This Mid- Carboniferous event is pivotal in the Carboniferous evolution of Nova Scotia. Rapid subsidence adjacent to transcurrent faults in the early Westphalian was succeeded by thermal sag in the later Westphalian and ultimately by basin inversion and unroofing after the early Permian as equatorial Pangaea finally assembled and subsequently rifted again in the Triassic.
  • Biodiversidad De Los Equinodermos (Echinodermata) Del Mar Profundo Mexicano

    Biodiversidad De Los Equinodermos (Echinodermata) Del Mar Profundo Mexicano

    Biodiversidad de los equinodermos (Echinodermata) del mar profundo mexicano Francisco A. Solís-Marín,1 A. Laguarda-Figueras,1 A. Durán González,1 A.R. Vázquez-Bader,2 Adolfo Gracia2 Resumen Nuestro conocimiento de la diversidad del mar profundo en aguas mexicanas se limita a los escasos estudios existentes. El número de especies descritas es incipiente y los registros taxonómicos que existen provienen sobre todo de estudios realizados por ex- tranjeros y muy pocos por investigadores mexicanos, con los cuales es posible conjuntar algunas listas faunísticas. Es importante dar a conocer lo que se sabe hasta el momen- to sobre los equinodermos de las zonas profundas de México, información básica para diversos sectores en nuestro país, tales como los tomadores de decisiones y científicos interesados en el tema. México posee hasta el momento 643 especies de equinoder- mos reportadas en sus aguas territoriales, aproximadamente el 10% del total de las especies reportadas en todo el planeta (~7,000). Según los registros de la Colección Nacional de Equinodermos (ICML, UNAM), la Colección de Equinodermos del “Natural History Museum, Smithsonian Institution”, Washington, DC., EUA y la bibliografía revisa- 1 Colección Nacional de Equinodermos “Ma. E. Caso Muñoz”, Laboratorio de Sistemá- tica y Ecología de Equinodermos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología (ICML), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). Apdo. Post. 70-305, México, D. F. 04510, México. 2 Laboratorio de Ecología Pesquera de Crustáceos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Lim- nología (ICML), (UNAM), Apdo. Postal 70-305, México D. F., 04510, México. 215 da, existen 348 especies de equinodermos que habitan las aguas profundas mexicanas (≥ 200 m) lo que corresponde al 54.4% del total de las especies reportadas para el país.
  • Larval Development of the Tropical Deep-Sea Echinoid Aspidodiademajacobyi: Phylogenetic Implications

    Larval Development of the Tropical Deep-Sea Echinoid Aspidodiademajacobyi: Phylogenetic Implications

    FAU Institutional Repository http://purl.fcla.edu/fau/fauir This paper was submitted by the faculty of FAU’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute. Notice: ©2000 Marine Biological Laboratory. The final published version of this manuscript is available at http://www.biolbull.org/. This article may be cited as: Young, C. M., & George, S. B. (2000). Larval development of the tropical deep‐sea echinoid Aspidodiadema jacobyi: phylogenetic implications. The Biological Bulletin, 198(3), 387‐395. Reference: Biol. Bull. 198: 387-395. (June 2000) Larval Development of the Tropical Deep-Sea Echinoid Aspidodiademajacobyi: Phylogenetic Implications CRAIG M. YOUNG* AND SOPHIE B. GEORGEt Division of Marine Science, Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution, 5600 U.S. Hwy. 1 N., Ft. Pierce, Florida 34946 Abstract. The complete larval development of an echi- Introduction noid in the family Aspidodiadematidaeis described for the first time from in vitro cultures of Aspidodiademajacobyi, Larval developmental mode has been inferredfrom egg a bathyal species from the Bahamian Slope. Over a period size for a large numberof echinodermspecies from the deep of 5 months, embryos grew from small (98-,um) eggs to sea, but only a few of these have been culturedinto the early very large (3071-pum)and complex planktotrophicechino- larval stages (Prouho, 1888; Mortensen, 1921; Young and pluteus larvae. The fully developed larva has five pairs of Cameron, 1989; Young et al., 1989), and no complete red-pigmented arms (preoral, anterolateral,postoral, pos- ontogenetic sequence of larval development has been pub- lished for invertebrate.One of the terodorsal,and posterolateral);fenestrated triangular plates any deep-sea species whose have been described et at the bases of fenestratedpostoral and posterodorsalarms; early stages (Young al., 1989) is a small-bodied sea urchin with a complex dorsal arch; posterodorsalvibratile lobes; a ring Aspidodiademajacobyi, flexible that lives at in the of cilia around the region of the preoral and anterolateral long spines bathyal depths eastern Atlantic 1).