Political Reviews • Polynesia 219 Pitcairn

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

political reviews • polynesia 219 Guilt on Assault, Discharged. 14 May. Brexit, while also lobbying London https://www.radionz.co.nz/international/ to ensure the territory’s interests were pacific-news/357316/niue-minister-admits safeguarded in the longer term. -guilt-on-assault-discharged A crucial meeting for Pitcairn ———. 2018b. Niue Premier Changes His was the European Union Overseas Mind on Pension Portability. 4 April. Countries and Territories Ministerial https://www.radionz.co.nz/international/ Conference held in Brussels between pacific-news/354078/niue-premier-changes 20 and 23 February 2018. A range -his-mind-on-pension-portability of issues were discussed, including Takelesi. 2017. Budget 2017 Passed By climate change, sustainable energy, Niue Assembly. Tala Niue, 8 Aug. and biodiversity, and what EU funding https://www.talaniue.com/budget-2017 could best support initiatives in these -passed-niue-assembly/ areas (octa 2018). The highlight for Pitcairn was the signing of a European Development Fund (edf)–11 Focal Sector agreement, worth 2.35 mil- Pitcairn € lion (us$2.72 million), to upgrade the The islands of Pitcairn, Henderson, island’s medical center and to sup- Ducie, and Oeno (commonly known port several tourism-related activities, as Pitcairn) make up a single territory, including “improving accessibility to the last remaining United Kingdom Pitcairn, specifically by developing Overseas Territory (ukot) in the the Bounty Bay and Tedside landings Pacific Ocean. But much of the period and improving on-shore facilities” and under review (1 July 2017–30 June “constructing a shelter and informa- 2018) was concerned with Pitcairn’s tion centre for tourists and other visi- relationship with the European Union tors” (European Commission 2018a). (EU), which has been highly advan- A further €480,000 (us$556,000) tageous to the territory. However, a was allocated under the EU’s Pacific long shadow has been cast over these Regional Funding to cover two-thirds relations due to the upcoming depar- of the preliminary budgeted cost of ture of the United Kingdom from the the introduction of solar-powered European Union (Brexit), which was renewable energy to Pitcairn (Pitcairn officially scheduled for 29 March Miscellany 2018b). 2019. Because of the frequent time lag in Pitcairn is an Overseas Country getting EU funds disbursed, Pitcairn and Territory (oct) of the Euro- also benefitted from some edf-10 pean Union. octs are not part of the money during the period under review. European Union and thus are not For example, a number of local road directly subject to EU law, but they improvement projects were under- do have associate status and thus taken through the European Union’s receive various forms of assistance integre (Territories Initiative for from Brussels. As a consequence, the Regional Management of the Envi- limited resources of the Pitcairn Island ronment) program (Pitcairn Miscel- Council were focused on securing as lany 2017a). integre also supported much EU funding as possible before a glass recycling project, whereby 220 the contemporary pacific • 31:1 (2019) empty glass bottles were recycled into UK government has not given any souvenirs for the tourist market (Pit- reassurances that it will make good cairn Miscellany 2017b). The projects any shortfalls in support. More gener- linked into integre’s focus on build- ally, there is still great uncertainty over ing resilience and sustainable develop- what a post-Brexit relationship with ment in the Pacific octs in the face the European Union will look like. of climate change. In addition, funds And so, Pitcairn and the other over- from edf-10 paid for a new goods seas territories are largely beholden to shed (Pitcairn Miscellany 2017a). trusting the UK government to make The importance of these funds was the best possible deal for them. made clear in July 2017, when Pitcairn The view from the European Islands Councillor Leslie Jaques gave Commission and the octs is rather evidence to the House of Lords Select mixed in terms of whether Pitcairn Committee on the European Union on and the other UK territories will be the likely impacts of Brexit. He noted able to maintain a relationship with that the European Union provides them once the United Kingdom has “a significant amount” of funding— withdrawn from the European Union. accounting for about 30 percent of In its political declaration after the Pitcairn’s overall budget (House of European Union Overseas Countries Lords 2017, 6). He also explained the and Territories Ministerial Conference importance of being part of a regional in February 2018, oct representa- envelope of funding, which helps to tives recommended that the Euro- facilitate cooperation with French pean Union “explore how [the UK] Polynesia, Wallis and Futuna, and octs can continue to benefit from New Caledonia. Pitcairn gains benefits preferential trade arrangements post in other respects too; the European Brexit” (octa 2018, 3). They also Union is one of Pitcairn’s largest suggested that the United Kingdom markets for its honey exports, and the could “contribute to the EU financial free movement of Pitcairners to French support earmarked for octs . with Polynesia, and particularly Tahiti, for a view to maintain ukots within or medical treatment is crucial. alongside the octs grouping” (octa As a consequence, Pitcairn has 2018, 9). Overseas Countries and Ter- much to lose from Brexit, and Jaques ritories Association (octa) Chair and did not mince words during his time French Polynesia Vice President Teva with the House of Lords committee. Rohfritsch stated, “We will not turn He said that the loss of EU funding our backs on our friends from Pitcairn and freedom of movement to other Island because of Brexit. Regional European Union territories would be co-operation will continue” (Pitcairn “catastrophic”; he went on to say that Miscellany 2018b). “we trust in the [Brexit] process and The European Commission was we hope for the best” (House of Lords more noncommittal, and in June 2018 2017, 19). Jaques also cautioned that published a draft for a new “Council “we do not know [who will fill the Decision on the Association of the funding gap], which is a concern” Overseas Countries and Territories (House of Lords 2017, 6). So far the with the European Union,” which political reviews • polynesia 221 specifically excludes the UK territo- needed. But there was also consider- ries: “The proposed Decision will take ation of whether a survey should be into account the consequences of the undertaken to see if current residents withdrawal of the United Kingdom of wanted to leave Pitcairn and what Great Britain and Northern Ireland support they might require to resettle from the European Union and the fact elsewhere (pic 2018c, 2; 2018d, 3). that the special regime set out in Part Nevertheless, there was frustration Four of the tfeu [Treaty on the Func- over the lack of concrete measures tioning of the European Union] would to start addressing Pitcairn’s perilous no longer apply to the 12 British future. One Islander remarked “that octs” (European Commission 2018b, we had spoken repeatedly on the same 9). So there are real concerns that, issues but nothing had happened to when (and if) a final Brexit deal is take things forward” (pic 2018d, 3). agreed to, the interests of Pitcairn and Despite heightened concerns over the other territories will be sidelined. the future of Pitcairn, several new With the potential loss of support initiatives were taken in an attempt to from the European Union, debate boost its economic viability. Perhaps over Pitcairn’s long-term viability was the most significant was the plan to placed into even sharper focus. The designate Pitcairn as a Dark Sky Sanc- population remains at a near histori- tuary. To date only four locations in cally low level—in the mid-forties— the world—Aotea/Great Barrier Island and it continues to age. Only seven (New Zealand); Cosmic Campground people in paid employment are under (United States); Gabriela Mistral the age of 50, and there are none in (Chile); and Rainbow Bridge National the 20–30 age group (UN 2018, 7). Monument (United States)—have The new UK governor of Pitcairn, this status. A Dark Sky Sanctuary is Laura Clarke, who assumed her post “public or private land that has an in January 2018, said the issue of exceptional or distinguished quality of the island’s future was “an existen- starry nights and a nocturnal environ- tial question with no quick or easy ment that is protected for its scien- answers” (Pitcairn Miscellany 2018c). tific, natural, or educational value, In an attempt to move this debate its cultural heritage and/or public forward, several workshops on Pit- enjoyment” (International Dark-Sky cairn’s future were held during the Association 2018). Pitcairn looked to period under review, although there the Aotea/Great Barrier Island in par- were concerns that the younger mem- ticular, which, after becoming a dark bers of the community did not engage sky reserve in 2012, saw a significant (pic 2018a, 2). Discussions included growth in so-called astro-tourism. whether Pitcairners’ attitude toward In February 2018, John Hearnshaw, migrants needed to improve; who emeritus astronomy professor from should Pitcairn be targeting as pro- the University of Canterbury, New spective migrants; and whether a more Zealand, visited Pitcairn and indicated realistic marketing campaign—one that the island met the criteria, and which also highlighted the difficulties it was expected that an application of migrating to the territory—was would be made to the International 222 the contemporary pacific • 31:1 (2019) Dark-Sky Association later in the year tember 2017, and according to the UK (Pitcairn Miscellany 2018a). government these enabled a successful However, the issue of Pitcairn’s reconciliation process to take place inaccessibility, which would need (UN 2018, 8).
Recommended publications
  • Traditional Leadership in the Constitution of the Marshall Islands

    Traditional Leadership in the Constitution of the Marshall Islands

    TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS by C. J. LYNCH Working Papers Series Pacific Islands Studies Center for Asian and Pacific Studies in collaboration with the Social Science Research Institute University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, Hawaii Joe Lynch is a consultant on legislation and constitutional drafting whose long experience in the Pacific encompasses island areas in Micronesia, Melanesia, and Polynesia. Robert C. Kiste, Director Pacific Islands Studies Program Center for Asian and Pacific Studies University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS (With Comparative Notes) C. J. Lynch 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface v Introductory 1 Part I. THE COUNCIL OF IROIJ l. The precursors 3 2. Functions of the Council 4 (a) General 4 (b) Relations with the Nitijela 6 ( c) The Council in action 9 3. Composition of the Council 10 4. Procedures of the Council 13 5. Miscellaneous matters 14 6. Comparisons 16 (a) Palau 16 (b) The Federated States of Micronesia 17 (c) Yap 18 (d) Vanuatu 21 (e) Western Samoa 22 (f) The Cook Islands 22 (g) Comment 24 Part II. THE TRADITIONAL RIGHTS COURT 7. The Traditional Rights Court and the judicial system 27 ADDENDUM: Two problems of interpretation 8. Comparisons and comment 34 Part III. CONCLUSION 9. General comments 35 10. Is a traditional input desirable? 37 APPENDIX 42 NOTES 43 iii PREFACE It hardly needs to be said that this paper is written by a lawyer and from a lawyer's point of view. This fact, however , necessarily means that it is selective, firstly in the aspects of its subject that are considered and secondly in the detail (especially on non-legal aspects) into which it goes.
  • The Place of Alcohol in the Lives of People from Tokelau, Fiji, Niue

    The Place of Alcohol in the Lives of People from Tokelau, Fiji, Niue

    The place of alcohol in the lives of people from Tokelau, Fiji, Niue, Tonga, Cook Islands and Samoa living in New Zealand: an overview The place of alcohol in the lives of people from Tokelau, Fiji, Niue, Tonga, Cook Islands and Samoa living in New Zealand: an overview A report prepared by Sector Analysis, Ministry of Health for the Alcohol Advisory Council of New Zealand ALAC Research Monograph Series: No 2 Wellington 1997 ISSN 1174-1856 ISBN 0-477-06317-9 Acknowledgments This particular chapter which is an overview of the reports from each of the six Pacific communities would not have been possible without all the field teams and participants who took part in the project. I would like to thank Ezra Jennings-Pedro, Terrisa Taupe, Tufaina Taupe Sofaia Kamakorewa, Maikali (Mike) Kilioni, Fane Malani, Tina McNicholas, Mere Samusamuvodre, Litimai Rasiga, Tevita Rasiga, Apisa Tuiqere, Ruve Tuivoavoa, Doreen Arapai, Dahlia Naepi, Slaven Naepi, Vili Nosa, Yvette Guttenbeil, Sione Liava’a, Wailangilala Tufui , Susana Tu’inukuafe, Anne Allan-Moetaua, Helen Kapi, Terongo Tekii, Tunumafono Ken Ah Kuoi, Tali Beaton, Myra McFarland, Carmel Peteru, Damas Potoi and their communities who supported them. Many people who have not been named offered comment and shared stories with us through informal discussion. Our families and friends were drawn in and though they did not formally participate they too gave their opinions and helped to shape the information gathered. Special thanks to all the participants and Jean Mitaera, Granby Siakimotu, Kili Jefferson, Dr Ian Prior, Henry Tuia, Lita Foliaki and Tupuola Malifa who reviewed the reports and asked pertinent questions.
  • Prioritizing Islands for the Eradication of Invasive Vertebrates in the United Kingdom Overseas Territories

    Prioritizing Islands for the Eradication of Invasive Vertebrates in the United Kingdom Overseas Territories

    Contributed Paper Prioritizing Islands for the Eradication of Invasive Vertebrates in the United Kingdom Overseas Territories JEFFREY DAWSON,∗ STEFFEN OPPEL,∗∗∗ RICHARD J. CUTHBERT,∗ NICK HOLMES,† JEREMY P. BIRD,‡ STUART H. M. BUTCHART,‡ DENA R. SPATZ,§ AND BERNIE TERSHY§ ∗RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire, SG19 2DL, United Kingdom †Island Conservation, 2161 Delaware Avenue, Suite A, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, U.S.A. ‡BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge, CB3 0NA, United Kingdom §University of California Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, U.S.A. Abstract: Invasive alien species are one of the primary threats to native biodiversity on islands worldwide. Consequently, eradicating invasive species from islands has become a mainstream conservation practice. Deciding which islands have the highest priority for eradication is of strategic importance to allocate limited resources to achieve maximum conservation benefit. Previous island prioritizations focused either on a narrow set of native species or on a small geographic area. We devised a prioritization approach that incorporates all threatened native terrestrial vertebrates and all invasive terrestrial vertebrates occurring on 11 U.K. overseas territories, which comprise over 2000 islands ranging from the sub-Antarctic to the tropics. Our approach includes eradication feasibility and distinguishes between the potential and realistic conservation value of an eradication, which reflects the benefit that would accrue following eradication of either all invasive species or only those species for which eradication techniques currently exist. We identified the top 25 priority islands for invasive species eradication that together would benefit extant populations of 155 native species including 45 globally threatened species.
  • Niue Treaty on Cooperation in Fisheries Surveillance and Law Enforcement in the South Pacific Region

    Niue Treaty on Cooperation in Fisheries Surveillance and Law Enforcement in the South Pacific Region

    NIUE TREATY ON COOPERATION IN FISHERIES SURVEILLANCE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC REGION THE PARTIES TO THIS TREATY: GIVEN that in accordance with international law as expressed in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, coastal States have sovereign rights for the purposes of exploring and exploiting, conserving and managing the fisheries resources of their exclusive economic zones and fisheries zones; TAKING INTO ACCOUNT Article 73 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; NOTING that the Parties to the South Pacific Forum Fisheries Agency Convention, 1979 have agreed under Article 5 of that Convention that the Forum Fisheries Committee shall promote intra- regional coordination and cooperation in fisheries surveillance and law enforcement; CONSIDERING the vast areas of ocean covered by the exclusive economic zones and fisheries zones of coastal States in the South Pacific region and the vital economic significance of such zones to the economic development of South Pacific coastal States; WISHING THEREFORE to enhance their ability to enforce effectively their fisheries laws, and deter breaches of such laws; HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE I - DEFINITIONS In this Treaty: (a) 'fishing' means: (i) searching for, catching, taking or harvesting fish; (ii) attempting to search for, catch, take or harvest fish; (iii) engaging in any other activity which can reasonably be expected to result in the locating, catching, taking or harvesting of fish; (iv) placing, searching for or recovering fish aggregating devices or associated electronic equipment such as radio beacons; (v) any operations at sea directly in support of, or in preparation for any activity described in this paragraph; (vi) use of any craft, air or sea borne, for any activity described in this paragraph except for emergencies involving the health and safety of the crew or the safety of a vessel; (vii) the processing, carrying or transhipping of fish that have been taken.
  • UK Overseas Territories

    UK Overseas Territories

    INFORMATION PAPER United Kingdom Overseas Territories - Toponymic Information United Kingdom Overseas Territories (UKOTs), also known as British Overseas Territories (BOTs), have constitutional and historical links with the United Kingdom, but do not form part of the United Kingdom itself. The Queen is the Head of State of all the UKOTs, and she is represented by a Governor or Commissioner (apart from the UK Sovereign Base Areas that are administered by MOD). Each Territory has its own Constitution, its own Government and its own local laws. The 14 territories are: Anguilla; Bermuda; British Antarctic Territory (BAT); British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT); British Virgin Islands; Cayman Islands; Falkland Islands; Gibraltar; Montserrat; Pitcairn, Henderson, Ducie and Oeno Islands; Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha; South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands; Turks and Caicos Islands; UK Sovereign Base Areas. PCGN recommend the term ‘British Overseas Territory Capital’ for the administrative centres of UKOTs. Production of mapping over the UKOTs does not take place systematically in the UK. Maps produced by the relevant territory, preferably by official bodies such as the local government or tourism authority, should be used for current geographical names. National government websites could also be used as an additional reference. Additionally, FCDO and MOD briefing maps may be used as a source for names in UKOTs. See the FCDO White Paper for more information about the UKOTs. ANGUILLA The territory, situated in the Caribbean, consists of the main island of Anguilla plus some smaller, mostly uninhabited islands. It is separated from the island of Saint Martin (split between Saint-Martin (France) and Sint Maarten (Netherlands)), 17km to the south, by the Anguilla Channel.
  • ISO Country Codes

    ISO Country Codes

    COUNTRY SHORT NAME DESCRIPTION CODE AD Andorra Principality of Andorra AE United Arab Emirates United Arab Emirates AF Afghanistan The Transitional Islamic State of Afghanistan AG Antigua and Barbuda Antigua and Barbuda (includes Redonda Island) AI Anguilla Anguilla AL Albania Republic of Albania AM Armenia Republic of Armenia Netherlands Antilles (includes Bonaire, Curacao, AN Netherlands Antilles Saba, St. Eustatius, and Southern St. Martin) AO Angola Republic of Angola (includes Cabinda) AQ Antarctica Territory south of 60 degrees south latitude AR Argentina Argentine Republic America Samoa (principal island Tutuila and AS American Samoa includes Swain's Island) AT Austria Republic of Austria Australia (includes Lord Howe Island, Macquarie Islands, Ashmore Islands and Cartier Island, and Coral Sea Islands are Australian external AU Australia territories) AW Aruba Aruba AX Aland Islands Aland Islands AZ Azerbaijan Republic of Azerbaijan BA Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina BB Barbados Barbados BD Bangladesh People's Republic of Bangladesh BE Belgium Kingdom of Belgium BF Burkina Faso Burkina Faso BG Bulgaria Republic of Bulgaria BH Bahrain Kingdom of Bahrain BI Burundi Republic of Burundi BJ Benin Republic of Benin BL Saint Barthelemy Saint Barthelemy BM Bermuda Bermuda BN Brunei Darussalam Brunei Darussalam BO Bolivia Republic of Bolivia Federative Republic of Brazil (includes Fernando de Noronha Island, Martim Vaz Islands, and BR Brazil Trindade Island) BS Bahamas Commonwealth of the Bahamas BT Bhutan Kingdom of Bhutan
  • The Pitcairn Islands the World’S Largest Fully Protected Marine Reserve

    The Pitcairn Islands the World’S Largest Fully Protected Marine Reserve

    A fact sheet from March 2015 The Pitcairn Islands The world’s largest fully protected marine reserve Overview In March 2015, the United Kingdom declared the world’s largest fully protected marine reserve in the remote waters surrounding the Pitcairn Islands in the South Pacific Ocean. The designation marks the first time any government has combined creation of a fully protected marine area with detailed plans for surveillance and enforcement that include use of the most up-to-date technology available. This approach sets a new standard for the comprehensive monitoring of protected areas. In 2013, The Pew Charitable Trusts and The National Geographic Society joined the local government, the Pitcairn Island Council, in submitting a proposal calling for creation of a marine reserve to protect these spectacular waters. The Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve spans 834,334 square kilometres (322,138 square miles). Together with the Chagos Marine Reserve in the Indian Ocean, designated in 2010, the United Kingdom has created the world’s two biggest fully protected marine areas, totalling 1,474,334 square kilometres (569,243 square miles). Through these actions, the United Kingdom—caretaker of the fifth-greatest amount of marine habitat of any country in the world—has established its place as a global leader in ocean conservation. Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve Traditional and cultural non-commercial fishing by the Pitcairn islanders and their visitors is permitted within 2 nautical miles of the summit of 40 Mile Reef and in a transit zone between Pitcairn and 40 Mile Reef. © 2015 The Pew Charitable Trusts Encompassing 99 per cent of Pitcairn’s exclusive economic zone, the Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve is about 3½ times the size of the land area of the United Kingdom.
  • What's New in Hanga Roa

    What's New in Hanga Roa

    Rapa Nui Journal: Journal of the Easter Island Foundation Volume 20 | Issue 2 Article 15 2006 What's New in Hanga Roa Follow this and additional works at: https://kahualike.manoa.hawaii.edu/rnj Part of the History of the Pacific slI ands Commons, and the Pacific slI ands Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation (2006) "What's New in Hanga Roa," Rapa Nui Journal: Journal of the Easter Island Foundation: Vol. 20 : Iss. 2 , Article 15. Available at: https://kahualike.manoa.hawaii.edu/rnj/vol20/iss2/15 This Commentary or Dialogue is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Hawai`i Press at Kahualike. It has been accepted for inclusion in Rapa Nui Journal: Journal of the Easter Island Foundation by an authorized editor of Kahualike. For more information, please contact [email protected]. et al.: What's New in Hanga Roa Kingdom, Pitcairn buys most of its off-island needs from New Zealand; practically nothing is purchased from the U.S.) Most islanders have their own gardens for vegetables and fruits, and catch fish so a relatively small amount of food­ stuffs are imported. Herbert Ford, director of the Pitcailll Islands Study Cen­ ter, came upon this discrepancy in a recent news story that stated Wisconsin exported $47,925 worth of goods to Pitcailll in 2005. He noted that they will likely never lealll the answer if the responses to his appeals for infonnation are any indica­ tion. Telephone calls brought no answer and requests for in­ formation went unanswered. April 5, 2006.
  • The Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve (PDF)

    The Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve (PDF)

    A fact sheet from March 2015 The Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve A global benchmark in marine protection Overview In September 2016, the United Kingdom created a fully protected marine reserve spanning about 830,000 square kilometres (320,465 square miles) in the remote waters surrounding the Pitcairn Islands in the South Pacific Ocean. The designation marked the first time that any government combined creation of a large, isolated and fully protected marine area with detailed plans for surveillance and enforcement that included use of the most up-to-date technology. This approach set a new standard for the comprehensive monitoring of protected areas. Three years earlier, in 2013, The Pew Trusts and the National Geographic Society had joined the local government, the Pitcairn Island Council, in submitting a proposal calling for creation of a marine reserve to safeguard these waters that teem with life. Together with the Chagos Marine Reserve in the Indian Ocean, designated in 2010, the United Kingdom has created two of the largest fully protected marine areas, totalling 1,470,000 square kilometres (567,017 square miles). Through these actions, the British government—caretaker of the fifth-greatest amount of marine habitat of any country in the world—has established its place as a global leader in ocean conservation. Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve Traditional and cultural non-commercial fishing by the Pitcairn islanders and their visitors is permitted within 2 nautical miles of the summit of 40 Mile Reef and in a transit zone between Pitcairn and 40 Mile Reef. © 2017 The Pew Trusts Encompassing 99 per cent of Pitcairn’s exclusive economic zone, the Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve is about 3½ times the size of the land area of the United Kingdom.
  • Automatic Exchange of Information (AEI) List of Counterparty Jurisdictions for Your Accounts Booked in British Virgin Islands

    Automatic Exchange of Information (AEI) List of Counterparty Jurisdictions for Your Accounts Booked in British Virgin Islands

    ab Automatic Exchange of Information (AEI) List of Counterparty Jurisdictions for your accounts booked in British Virgin Islands Disclaimer UBS AG and its affiliated entities (UBS) does not provide legal or tax advice and this summary does not constitute such advice. UBS strongly recommends all persons considering the information described in this summary obtain appropriate independent legal, tax and other professional advice. This summary is for your information only and is not intended as an offer, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any product or other specific services. Although all pieces of information and views expressed in this summary were obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith, neither representation nor warranty, express or implied is made as to its accuracy or completeness. The general explanations included in this summary cannot address your personal situation and financial needs. All information is subject to change without notice. This summary may not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of UBS. The status of a jurisdiction can change at any time. Whilst UBS will use all reasonable endeavors to update this list, there may be changes which become effective before a revised list is published. Information to be reported will depend on the status of the client's jurisdiction(s) of tax residence at the cut-off date for reporting and such status may differ from the status displayed on this list. Information contained in the below table does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever concerning the legal status of any territory or of its authorities.
  • Pitcairn Islands

    Pitcairn Islands

    Pitcairn Islands M. de L. Brooke Mitsuaki Iwago/Minden Pictures/FLPA Mitsuaki Iwago/Minden Bristle-thighed Curlews General introduction The Pitcairn Islands lie in the central South Pacific, about one of the UK’s Overseas Territories. In practice this means 300 miles to the south-east of the Gambier Islands of French that local decisions are taken by the 10-strong Island Council. Polynesia. The group comprises four islands: Pitcairn itself, Decisions about what might be termed foreign affairs are Henderson, Oeno and Ducie. Only Pitcairn, a rugged but handled by the British Administration in consultation with the small volcanic island (2 square miles/5 square km), is Island Council. A commissioner based in Auckland, New inhabited. The World Heritage Site of Henderson (14 Zealand, is responsible for arranging much of the island’s square miles/37 square km) is a raised coral island to the supplies and for philatelic issues, an important source of north-east of Pitcairn, while Oeno and Ducie are tiny, low income. The Governor of the Pitcairn Islands is based in atolls to the north and east respectively. Further details are Wellington where his principal role is as British High supplied in the site accounts of the four islands. Commissioner to New Zealand. There is also an officer in the Overseas Territory Department of the Foreign and The group is chiefly renowned for its association with the Commonwealth Office in London with responsibility for Bounty mutineers who arrived on Pitcairn in January 1790. Pitcairn matters. Since that time, and apart from two interruptions during the 19th century, the island has been continuously occupied Broadly the population grew during the 19th century and by the mutineers and their descendants.
  • Evolution of the EU List of Tax Havens

    Evolution of the EU List of Tax Havens

    Evolution of the EU list of tax havens 22 February 2021 12 jurisdictions 9 jurisdictions American Samoa, Anguilla, Australia, Barbados, Botswana, Eswatini, Jamaica, Jordan, Maldives, Dominica, Fiji, Guam, Palau, Thailand, Turkey Panama, Samoa, Seychelles, Trinidad and Tobago, Vanuatu, US Virgin Islands Moved from black list to grey list Barbados Added to the black list Removed from the grey list Dominica Morocco, Namibia and Saint Lucia 6 October 12 jurisdictions 2020 10 jurisdictions American Samoa, Anguilla, Australia, Botswana, Eswatini, Jordan, Maldives, Morocco, Namibia, Barbados, Fiji, Guam, Palau, Saint Lucia, Thailand, Turkey Panama, Samoa, Seychelles, Trinidad and Tobago, Vanuatu, US Virgin Islands 9 jurisdictions Moved from grey list to black list Anguilla American Samoa, Belize, Fiji, Guam, Oman, Samoa, Trinidad and Tobago, Vanuatu, Added to the black list Removed from the grey list US Virgin Islands Barbados Bosnia and Herzegovina, Mongolia Removed from the blacklist Cayman Islands, Oman Taxation and Customs Union 18 February 12 jurisdictions 2020 13 jurisdictions American Samoa, Cayman Anguilla, Australia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Eswatini, Jordan, Islands, Fiji, Guam, Palau, Maldives, Morocco, Mongolia, Namibia, Saint Lucia, Thailand and Turkey Panama, Samoa, Seychelles, Oman, Trinidad and Tobago, Vanuatu, US Virgin Islands Moved from grey list to black list Cayman Islands, Palau and Seychelles Added to the black list Removed from the grey list Panama Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda,