State Society and Governance in Melanesia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

State Society and Governance in Melanesia CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by The Australian National University THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY School of International, Political and Strategic Studies State, Society and Governance in Melanesia State Society and in Governance Melanesia DISCUSSION PAPER Discussion Paper 2010/5 OCEANIA’S POLITicaL inSTITUTionS AND TRANSITIONS1 The Pacific Islands region includes entities Pitcairn Island with only 45 inhabitants. JON closely incorporated with the metropolitan Of the 9.7 million people who inhabit the FRAENKEL powers located around the Pacific Rim, 551,500 km2 land area of Oceania, just such as Guam (USA), Rapa Nui (Chile) and over two-thirds are in PNG. Tokelau (New Zealand), as well as inde- Classical political science questions pendent states like Papua New Guinea, Fiji have been addressed in strikingly different and Kiribati. The region includes countries ways across the region—whether to accom- that achieved independence less than thir- modate ethnic diversity through unitary, ty years ago as well as those still in the devolved or federal systems; whether to process of adjustment to the post-colonial handle conflict through majoritarian or pro- order. It includes resource-rich territories portional electoral systems and/or through with strong potential for integration into the power sharing arrangements, and wheth- world economy alongside chronically er to adopt parliamentary or presiden- resource-poor countries with limited ave- tial systems or, as in Kiribati and in the nues for export-driven economic growth. It includes territories with open access to autonomous region of Bougainville, some metropolitan labour markets, and countries hybrid between the two. Other important without. It includes an extraordinary ethno- questions for the region have been how linguistic diversity, mostly in Melanesia, to meld traditional forms of governance which alone accounts for one-fifth of the with imported institutions; how to respond world’s documented living languages.2 It to exceptionally low levels of women’s includes relatively big nations like PNG representation and how to build states in (6.6 million) alongside tiny micro-states countries where—for many who live in rural like Niue, which has a population of only areas and engage largely in subsistence 1,500, and minute dependent territories like cultivation—the state matters little. Oceania’s Political Institutions and Transitions RELATIONSHIP TO New Caledonia is unique: as a result of the 2 METROPOLITAN POWERS 1998 Noumea Accord, the territory has special legislative powers and a schedule for phased expansion of domestic political control ahead Close integration of territories with metropoli- of a referendum on independence between tan powers is a legacy of the colonial expe- 2014–2019. To agree to that accord entailed rience. Hawai‘i became the fiftieth Pacific such a rupture with the doctrine of indivisibility state in 1959, while other American Pacific of the Republic that France had to hold a territories—Guam, American Samoa, and nationwide referendum, the result of which the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas earned New Caledonia a special provision in (CNMI)—are described by the US Supreme the constitution (Maclellan 2005: 397). Court as having become “appurtenant to but Of the sixteen territories in the not a part of the United States” (Underwood world that remain on the UN list of non- 2006: 7). Rapa Nui was annexed in 1888 but decolonized territories, the Pacific accounts only legally absorbed into Chile’s Valparaiso for five—American Samoa, Guam, New Province in 1966. Residence on the island Caledonia, Pitcairn Island and Tokelau. Nei- by Chileans is still restricted as is acquisi- ther of Tokelau’s two referenda (2006 and tion of property by those not of Rapa Nui 2007) on whether to become self-governing descent. By contrast, after West Papua was achieved the required two-thirds majority, absorbed into Indonesia with United Nations and Pitcairn Island’s links with Britain have, (UN) approval after the “Act of Free Choice” if anything, been reinforced by adjudication in 1969, a mixture of spontaneous and of child abuses cases by the British Privy sponsored transmigration brought in three Council. American military build up on Guam quarters of a million people, mainly from the in the new millennium makes independence islands of Java and Sulawesi. Integration less likely, despite longstanding Chamorro with a powerful neighbour tends to open the disquiet about existing arrangements. Inclu- floodgates to settlement, as on Saipan (Com- sion on, or exclusion from, the UN list can monwealth of the Northern Marianas) where prove highly controversial, with behind-the- the majority were non-indigenes in 2000, scenes manoeuvring at the UN headquarters mostly from the Philippines or China. in New York or Geneva being used to exert New Caledonia, French Polynesia and leverage towards independence back home. Wallis and Futuna, are in law, part of the The incentives are clear. In 2008, UN Secre- French nation-state; all participate in elections tary General Ban Ki-moon urged the world for the national assembly and the Presidency. “to complete the decolonization process in The CFP franc, the currency in all three every one of the remaining sixteen Non-Self- territories, is pegged to the euro. In 1958, Governing Territories”.3 Pro-independence French President General Charles de Gaulle leader Oscar Temaru, after his initial election insisted on the doctrine of the “one and as French Polynesia’s President in 2004, indivisible republic”, and forced voters in sought to get his country onto the UN list fol- French Polynesia to choose between colonial lowing the precedent set by New Caledonia integration or abrupt secession. Sixty-four per in the wake of the 1980s Kanak uprising. cent voted in favour of staying with France. Samoa was the first of the Pacific Island The pro-independence movement was states to secure independence in 1962, and defeated, and after disturbances in Papeete, the unique constitutional arrangements cho- its leader, Pouvanaa a Oopa, was imprisoned sen at that time (discussed later) have prob- (Henningham 1992: 123–26). The peoples ably contributed to that country’s postcolonial of the French Pacific remain confronted with stability. Tonga formally became independent those stark options, although in modified in 1970, but here the colonial hand was, for forms: since 2003 they may opt to become the most part, light. Financial irregularities “territorial collectivities”, with considerable under King George Tupou II (1893–1918) led autonomy. French Polynesia went a step the British colonists to demand closer control further by adopting its own autonomy statute. (Fusitu’a & Rutherford 1977: 180). Britain Oceania’s Political Institutions and Transitions became preoccupied with Europe during the the Santo rebellion in 1980 was the most 1914–1918 war, and on its heels the Great severe of the secessionist crises accompa- 3 Depression enabled Tupou II’s more capable nying independence anywhere in the Pacific successor Queen Salote to preserve Tonga’s region: Jimmy Stevens’ Vemerana Provision- political autonomy. Fiji’s independence was al Government on Santo threatened to break inevitably problematic because of the need up the emerging state, until the rebellion was to reconcile the competing aspirations of the halted by the deployment of British, French, majority Fiji Indian and minority indigenous and Papua New Guinean troops. The only Fijian leaders (Norton 2004). Ethnic Fijian actual case of secession in Oceania was claims that since the country had been ceded exceptionally peaceful: in 1976, the British to Queen Victoria by their chiefs in 1874 it Gilbert and Ellice Islands decided to go their should now be returned to those indigenous separate ways and a few years later became chiefs were to become a rallying cry of the independent as Kiribati (1979) and Tuvalu ethno-nationalists who overthrew elected (1978).5 Bougainville’s decade-long conflict governments in 1987 and 2000. Fiji Indian first with PNG and then internally is the most claims that the communally based electoral severe of the modern-day secessionist dis- system left as a compromise by the British putes. Its peace settlement, like that of the at independence perpetuated race-based New Caledonian crisis of the 1980s, included voting were to become a prominent theme of a central provision that delayed the decision the military-backed interim government that on independence for at least a decade.6 emerged in the wake of Fiji’s third coup in In between the extremes of independence December 2006. and incorporation, the Pacific Islands are Constitutional choices made at indepen- host to a range of hybrid political arrange- dence also had enduring implications else- ments between island territories and former where in the region, in contrast to Africa colonial rulers. New Zealand experimented where initial legal frameworks bequeathed with Compacts of Free Association with Niue by colonial powers were often torn up and and the Cook Islands. Palau, the Federated new arrangements adopted (Chazan 1992). States of Micronesia and the Republic of the Depth of consultation made a difference Marshall Islands entered Compacts of Free to the political authority of whatever struc- Association with the US that gave them con- tures were chosen. PNG (1975) and Kiribati siderable autonomy (allowing them, unlike (1979) used constitutional conventions for Cook Islands and Niue, to
Recommended publications
  • Traditional Leadership in the Constitution of the Marshall Islands
    TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS by C. J. LYNCH Working Papers Series Pacific Islands Studies Center for Asian and Pacific Studies in collaboration with the Social Science Research Institute University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, Hawaii Joe Lynch is a consultant on legislation and constitutional drafting whose long experience in the Pacific encompasses island areas in Micronesia, Melanesia, and Polynesia. Robert C. Kiste, Director Pacific Islands Studies Program Center for Asian and Pacific Studies University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS (With Comparative Notes) C. J. Lynch 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface v Introductory 1 Part I. THE COUNCIL OF IROIJ l. The precursors 3 2. Functions of the Council 4 (a) General 4 (b) Relations with the Nitijela 6 ( c) The Council in action 9 3. Composition of the Council 10 4. Procedures of the Council 13 5. Miscellaneous matters 14 6. Comparisons 16 (a) Palau 16 (b) The Federated States of Micronesia 17 (c) Yap 18 (d) Vanuatu 21 (e) Western Samoa 22 (f) The Cook Islands 22 (g) Comment 24 Part II. THE TRADITIONAL RIGHTS COURT 7. The Traditional Rights Court and the judicial system 27 ADDENDUM: Two problems of interpretation 8. Comparisons and comment 34 Part III. CONCLUSION 9. General comments 35 10. Is a traditional input desirable? 37 APPENDIX 42 NOTES 43 iii PREFACE It hardly needs to be said that this paper is written by a lawyer and from a lawyer's point of view. This fact, however , necessarily means that it is selective, firstly in the aspects of its subject that are considered and secondly in the detail (especially on non-legal aspects) into which it goes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Place of Alcohol in the Lives of People from Tokelau, Fiji, Niue
    The place of alcohol in the lives of people from Tokelau, Fiji, Niue, Tonga, Cook Islands and Samoa living in New Zealand: an overview The place of alcohol in the lives of people from Tokelau, Fiji, Niue, Tonga, Cook Islands and Samoa living in New Zealand: an overview A report prepared by Sector Analysis, Ministry of Health for the Alcohol Advisory Council of New Zealand ALAC Research Monograph Series: No 2 Wellington 1997 ISSN 1174-1856 ISBN 0-477-06317-9 Acknowledgments This particular chapter which is an overview of the reports from each of the six Pacific communities would not have been possible without all the field teams and participants who took part in the project. I would like to thank Ezra Jennings-Pedro, Terrisa Taupe, Tufaina Taupe Sofaia Kamakorewa, Maikali (Mike) Kilioni, Fane Malani, Tina McNicholas, Mere Samusamuvodre, Litimai Rasiga, Tevita Rasiga, Apisa Tuiqere, Ruve Tuivoavoa, Doreen Arapai, Dahlia Naepi, Slaven Naepi, Vili Nosa, Yvette Guttenbeil, Sione Liava’a, Wailangilala Tufui , Susana Tu’inukuafe, Anne Allan-Moetaua, Helen Kapi, Terongo Tekii, Tunumafono Ken Ah Kuoi, Tali Beaton, Myra McFarland, Carmel Peteru, Damas Potoi and their communities who supported them. Many people who have not been named offered comment and shared stories with us through informal discussion. Our families and friends were drawn in and though they did not formally participate they too gave their opinions and helped to shape the information gathered. Special thanks to all the participants and Jean Mitaera, Granby Siakimotu, Kili Jefferson, Dr Ian Prior, Henry Tuia, Lita Foliaki and Tupuola Malifa who reviewed the reports and asked pertinent questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Niue Treaty on Cooperation in Fisheries Surveillance and Law Enforcement in the South Pacific Region
    NIUE TREATY ON COOPERATION IN FISHERIES SURVEILLANCE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC REGION THE PARTIES TO THIS TREATY: GIVEN that in accordance with international law as expressed in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, coastal States have sovereign rights for the purposes of exploring and exploiting, conserving and managing the fisheries resources of their exclusive economic zones and fisheries zones; TAKING INTO ACCOUNT Article 73 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; NOTING that the Parties to the South Pacific Forum Fisheries Agency Convention, 1979 have agreed under Article 5 of that Convention that the Forum Fisheries Committee shall promote intra- regional coordination and cooperation in fisheries surveillance and law enforcement; CONSIDERING the vast areas of ocean covered by the exclusive economic zones and fisheries zones of coastal States in the South Pacific region and the vital economic significance of such zones to the economic development of South Pacific coastal States; WISHING THEREFORE to enhance their ability to enforce effectively their fisheries laws, and deter breaches of such laws; HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE I - DEFINITIONS In this Treaty: (a) 'fishing' means: (i) searching for, catching, taking or harvesting fish; (ii) attempting to search for, catch, take or harvest fish; (iii) engaging in any other activity which can reasonably be expected to result in the locating, catching, taking or harvesting of fish; (iv) placing, searching for or recovering fish aggregating devices or associated electronic equipment such as radio beacons; (v) any operations at sea directly in support of, or in preparation for any activity described in this paragraph; (vi) use of any craft, air or sea borne, for any activity described in this paragraph except for emergencies involving the health and safety of the crew or the safety of a vessel; (vii) the processing, carrying or transhipping of fish that have been taken.
    [Show full text]
  • ISO Country Codes
    COUNTRY SHORT NAME DESCRIPTION CODE AD Andorra Principality of Andorra AE United Arab Emirates United Arab Emirates AF Afghanistan The Transitional Islamic State of Afghanistan AG Antigua and Barbuda Antigua and Barbuda (includes Redonda Island) AI Anguilla Anguilla AL Albania Republic of Albania AM Armenia Republic of Armenia Netherlands Antilles (includes Bonaire, Curacao, AN Netherlands Antilles Saba, St. Eustatius, and Southern St. Martin) AO Angola Republic of Angola (includes Cabinda) AQ Antarctica Territory south of 60 degrees south latitude AR Argentina Argentine Republic America Samoa (principal island Tutuila and AS American Samoa includes Swain's Island) AT Austria Republic of Austria Australia (includes Lord Howe Island, Macquarie Islands, Ashmore Islands and Cartier Island, and Coral Sea Islands are Australian external AU Australia territories) AW Aruba Aruba AX Aland Islands Aland Islands AZ Azerbaijan Republic of Azerbaijan BA Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina BB Barbados Barbados BD Bangladesh People's Republic of Bangladesh BE Belgium Kingdom of Belgium BF Burkina Faso Burkina Faso BG Bulgaria Republic of Bulgaria BH Bahrain Kingdom of Bahrain BI Burundi Republic of Burundi BJ Benin Republic of Benin BL Saint Barthelemy Saint Barthelemy BM Bermuda Bermuda BN Brunei Darussalam Brunei Darussalam BO Bolivia Republic of Bolivia Federative Republic of Brazil (includes Fernando de Noronha Island, Martim Vaz Islands, and BR Brazil Trindade Island) BS Bahamas Commonwealth of the Bahamas BT Bhutan Kingdom of Bhutan
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Exchange of Information (AEI) List of Counterparty Jurisdictions for Your Accounts Booked in British Virgin Islands
    ab Automatic Exchange of Information (AEI) List of Counterparty Jurisdictions for your accounts booked in British Virgin Islands Disclaimer UBS AG and its affiliated entities (UBS) does not provide legal or tax advice and this summary does not constitute such advice. UBS strongly recommends all persons considering the information described in this summary obtain appropriate independent legal, tax and other professional advice. This summary is for your information only and is not intended as an offer, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any product or other specific services. Although all pieces of information and views expressed in this summary were obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith, neither representation nor warranty, express or implied is made as to its accuracy or completeness. The general explanations included in this summary cannot address your personal situation and financial needs. All information is subject to change without notice. This summary may not be reproduced or copies circulated without prior authority of UBS. The status of a jurisdiction can change at any time. Whilst UBS will use all reasonable endeavors to update this list, there may be changes which become effective before a revised list is published. Information to be reported will depend on the status of the client's jurisdiction(s) of tax residence at the cut-off date for reporting and such status may differ from the status displayed on this list. Information contained in the below table does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever concerning the legal status of any territory or of its authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the EU List of Tax Havens
    Evolution of the EU list of tax havens 22 February 2021 12 jurisdictions 9 jurisdictions American Samoa, Anguilla, Australia, Barbados, Botswana, Eswatini, Jamaica, Jordan, Maldives, Dominica, Fiji, Guam, Palau, Thailand, Turkey Panama, Samoa, Seychelles, Trinidad and Tobago, Vanuatu, US Virgin Islands Moved from black list to grey list Barbados Added to the black list Removed from the grey list Dominica Morocco, Namibia and Saint Lucia 6 October 12 jurisdictions 2020 10 jurisdictions American Samoa, Anguilla, Australia, Botswana, Eswatini, Jordan, Maldives, Morocco, Namibia, Barbados, Fiji, Guam, Palau, Saint Lucia, Thailand, Turkey Panama, Samoa, Seychelles, Trinidad and Tobago, Vanuatu, US Virgin Islands 9 jurisdictions Moved from grey list to black list Anguilla American Samoa, Belize, Fiji, Guam, Oman, Samoa, Trinidad and Tobago, Vanuatu, Added to the black list Removed from the grey list US Virgin Islands Barbados Bosnia and Herzegovina, Mongolia Removed from the blacklist Cayman Islands, Oman Taxation and Customs Union 18 February 12 jurisdictions 2020 13 jurisdictions American Samoa, Cayman Anguilla, Australia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Eswatini, Jordan, Islands, Fiji, Guam, Palau, Maldives, Morocco, Mongolia, Namibia, Saint Lucia, Thailand and Turkey Panama, Samoa, Seychelles, Oman, Trinidad and Tobago, Vanuatu, US Virgin Islands Moved from grey list to black list Cayman Islands, Palau and Seychelles Added to the black list Removed from the grey list Panama Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda,
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders from Some Pacific Islands, Part IV the Cook Islands and Niue
    Spiders from Some Pacific Islands, Part IV The Cook Islands and Niue B. J. MARPLES1 THE COOK ISLANDS are a group of small islands arately. Of the 30 species, 27 are recorded also in the region of the central South Pacific from Samoa, 15 from the Cook Islands, and 11 bounded by 8°_23° S. and 156°-16r W. They from ',' the Society Islands. Samoa is the largest are divisible into two groups, the northern land mass in this region and the one whose Cooks which are small atolls, and the southern spider fauna is best known. Fiji, to the west, Cooks which, with one exception, are volcanic has not yet been adequately explored. Of the islands. The southern Cooks are surrounded by three species recorded from Niue but not from coral formations and in some cases have been Samoa, N ephila prolixa represents the most raised so that the islands have a coral rim up easterly extension of the genus in the Pacific. to 300 ft. high. The largest island is Rarotonga, It occurs in Fiji and Tonga and was recorded with an area of some 26 sq. mi. and rising to by Koch (l871) some 90 years ago in Samoa, a height of 2,140 ft. The Society Islands, the but it has not been recorded there since. Dras­ next group to the east, lie some 600 mi. from sodes ciusi, a new r ec ord, was previously Raroronga. described from N ew Caledonia and the Loyalty The island of N iue will be considered to­ Islands far to the west.
    [Show full text]
  • Results from Cook Islands, Niue, Samoa and Tokelau
    Independent evaluations of the Cook Results from Cook Islands, Niue, Samoa and Tokelau Recommendations from the evaluations Islands, Niue, Samoa and Tokelau The evaluation concluded that New Zealand’s development cooperation has contributed to sustainable The independent evaluation recommended that we take a country Programmes economic and human development in the Cook Islands, Niue, Samoa and Tokelau. more strategic approach when deploying our resources and addressing public/private sector issues. ASI recommended strengthening of the environment for the private sector and in-country government capacity. Results highlighted by ASI are outlined below. ASI recommended the following actions to improve country KEY FINDINGS Programme assistance in the future. OUR RELATIONSHIPS Cook Islands Develop a new process for country strategies in partnership with Adam Smith International (ASI) found that we have strong and Our support for tourism has led to demonstrable economic development outcomes. The New Zealand government agencies. enduring relationships with the four Pacific Island countries. next step should see them address a number of challenges to ensure sustainability. This could result in country strategies highlighting major Investment in renewable energy has also had an impact. An example being the Te Mana Our strategic framework of assistance works well. High level constraints to economic and human development. It could also o Te Ra project which meets 5% of Rarotonga’s electricity needs. priorities are incorporated into each country Programme. articulate how all New Zealand resources will be used to address The Health Specialist Visits Programme, our most significant health investment, operates constraints. effectively and achieves good outputs. It is highly regarded by Cook Islanders.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of New Zealand's Aid Programmes in the Cook Islands, Niue, Samoa and Tokelau a Synthesis Report
    December 2015 New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade | Manatū Aorere Evaluation of New Zealand’s Aid Programmes in the Cook Islands, Niue, Samoa and Tokelau A Synthesis Report Further details about author Adam Smith International (ASI) is an award-winning professional services business that delivers real impact, value and lasting change through projects supporting economic growth and government reform internationally. Our reputation as a global leader has been built on the positive results our projects have achieved in many of the world’s most challenging environments. We provide high quality specialist expertise and intelligent programme management capability at all stages of the project cycle, from policy and strategy development, to design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. The views expressed in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New Zealand Government, the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade or any other party. Nor do these entities accept any liability for claims arising from the report’s content or reliance on it. 1 Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................... ..3 1. Background..................................................................................... ..7 2. Findings – Aid Quality....................................................................... 10 3. Findings – Results ............................................................................ 22 4. Conclusion and Recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • Add Reference That GSP Items Are Based on Eight-Digit Classifications
    INFORMATION ON COUNTRIES AND PRODUCTS ELIGIBLE FOR GSP AND ON PROCEDURES FOR MODIFYING THE GSP PROGRAM GSP-Eligible Beneficiaries Independent countries The following independent countries are GSP-eligible beneficiaries (BDCs): Afghanistan Eritrea Nepal Albania Ethiopia Niger Algeria Fiji Nigeria Angola Gabon Oman Argentina Gambia, The Pakistan Armenia Georgia Panama Bangladesh Ghana Papua New Guinea Belize Grenada Paraguay Benin Guinea Peru Bhutan Guinea-Bissau Philippines Bolivia Guyana Russia Bosnia and Hercegovina Haiti Rwanda Botswana India St. Kitts and Nevis Brazil Indonesia Saint Lucia Burkina Faso Iraq Saint Vincent and Burundi Jamaica the Grenadines Cambodia Jordan Samoa Cameroon Kazakhstan Sao Tomé and Principe Cape Verde Kenya Senegal Central African Republic Kiribati Serbia and Montenegro Chad Kyrgyzstan Seychelles Colombia Lebanon Sierra Leone Comoros Lesotho Solomon Islands Congo (Brazzaville) Liberia Somalia Congo (Kinshasa) Macedonia, Former South Africa Costa Rica Yugoslav Republic of Sri Lanka Côte d'Ivoire Madagascar Suriname Croatia Malawi Swaziland Djibouti Mali Tanzania Dominica Mauritania Thailand Dominican Republic Mauritius Togo East Timor Moldova Tonga Ecuador Mongolia Trinidad and Tobago Egypt Mozambique Tunisia Equatorial Guinea Namibia Turkey 17 Tuvalu Uzbekistan Zambia Uganda Vanuatu Zimbabwe Ukraine Venezuela Uruguay Republic of Yemen Non-independent countries and territories The following non-independent countries and territories are GSP-eligible beneficiaries: Anguilla Falkland Islands Pitcairn Islands
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Sixth National Report
    Niue’s Sixth National Report Convention on Biological Diversity August 2020 Department of Environment GOVERNMENT OF NIUE 1 Table of Contents Executive summary ......................................................................................................................................... i Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... v Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Section I. Targets being pursued at the national level................................................................................ 2 National Target 1: Protection of biological diversity .............................................................................. 3 National Target 2: Policy, planning and institutional frameworks ......................................................... 4 National Target 3: Local communities and customs ............................................................................... 5 National Target 4: Institutional strengthening ........................................................................................ 6 National Target 5: Financial sustainability ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dac Members' Gross Oda by World Bank Income
    DAC MEMBERS’ GROSS ODA BY WORLD BANK INCOME CLASSIFICATIONS This flyer presents DAC members’ Official Development Assistance (ODA) in recent years according to World Bank income classifications1,2, instead of according to the groups in the DAC List of ODA Recipients where the United Nations’ Least Developed Countries (LDCs) are listed separately. As the LDC category cuts across income categories, it includes some low income countries as well as some lower middle income countries, two of which are not eligible for World Bank IDA lending (Angola and Equatorial Guinea). All figures are gross bilateral disbursements. Figure 1. DAC members’ gross bilateral ODA by World Bank income classifications, 2006-2015 100 90 0.9 0.2 0.3 1.0 0.2 1.2 0.2 0.4 80 1.0 19 26 0.9 21 17 20 20 22 70 27 19 25 60 High income 50 Upper middle income 37 35 45 37 38 38 36 Lower middle income 40 44 34 32 Low income 30 Billion USD, constant 2014 prices 20 29 31 23 24 26 25 25 25 10 18 20 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 As shown in figure 1, aid to lower middle income countries has consistently represented the largest share of aid allocable by income over the last decade, totalling between USD 35 and 45 billion in constant 2014 prices over the last 5 years, and representing between 40 and 50 percent of bilateral aid allocable by income. As a result of exceptionally high debt relief to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, aid to the low income countries was at its highest in 2011 (USD 31 billion in constant 2014 prices), representing 35% of ODA allocable by income.
    [Show full text]