DOCSLIB.ORG

Genealogy of John Menefee & Mary James

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

-11 lb 1.•> • ' ' '•• " 1 X ^„ • ' ' .''''">• , :;' , V^ ,' " -'J' •' A. ' ' '..'•'.'•-A x - v '. : - ^ A. u : - , . ^ V--:• • << '• ' !'• 'vA'A . X " ".'^- '-/ ^ ' ,- ' - '.. ^ ' 7 " - ("x •. X.'" A • :* y y; *\ . \ ! ",A ",- r - • ;\ • > . A A > ) -• ) ^ •-•'•/- .. s • - A s > ••' •' j * ,"' ' »: .. AA'\ r ' 'VV--' l V - ' - ;,•• AAA,, . A /-' ' 1 (.M '' • ^ X ' ; ^,I v ' , - » A, .•'•'•• A '• ..-• ' ; ' -• , • •'--• J 'S - A ; • V ' /••• .i n " l .(, i Genealogy )/ " V"Y") V • i» jl Y ")' i (A oUJf. thLI1Ce ;, ,, - John MenefeMenefeee / r: t '• : • anaj.- - y Mary James N'M I . ^ ' > A Family A; A&..A tn..',. A•" / ' ' •,"' > :Af[/ '' : - -1 u . ,; : -A- . ; M ./ r\ / TT si • y • >• : -... , ^ . \ , -,- < > - '.'' , -7 / ' > A- AmericA„_ --aA ' V '..h-j. ..A. • A, ,; ^v --"-::'--r.c ; x v ^v • vA< A 4. eAA, (.;,))• , , • - , .. i ;• rf,!/ - A? ^ „• , / : : : >A ' ' ^ - AA-'1 ' -• ' > / ^: ' A - ;x', ' A; •• ' ? > . '•:-V. ^ . >; ^ A>'^: • ^ \- , ^ .} t .. •• A. " • - A < ? '•' ; / x : ^ "-.••••, K' I r- ! A- ./J . K • - / /•- .> - ^ • ...;-. 1 • s; , A' ! ' v • ^ - > • " ; : 'v ; .• - A ; - X / ( v ' ' •- ' A- ' •• \ Xy. ir : A v i - ,t •' 7 A -; '/.x A-- :..' WA - ; ' r •>'> A x ; V:; ; .: . - • AA {r - " ' • v"' .< / A -" v- Y •' ; ^ - ' / " • " " •• '•< ' x ; :. ' X ' X ^ V' , ' X- V v Y, Y '-A ^: - 7 : • 'A A- : 'iJ '> ''*- XjA -A- ', Y A - ^ w A ;, i A , .A, . ., •- ,' -O:> .7 v\, . :')-'•• > • , i • . A "\ ' nJ - i • . , .. -- ) . ... ' -• Y ' .. ' Y - " . ' ' J y: -f-pA . / < -' .. :. :• A , :;A ••!•• . * . ' X •/ \ ^ - , ' ' — ' : /".X A A ' '"' "V ; " :-\.;\. , ,X^ 4 , • -' • , •;;, • A A '^ ' " i x x ^ •/ ^ l ^ '^ '; h !- * •• A- A , ". ' ' '.-':r ! ^ X. , • , f • f" ->\fi HA ., . >^ ' - ,;« ,A'" -.;" . >^: .,. -,', ' i, ' , -AAr' : " •• ,•* ' ""' ( i " ^%. ...... J ' A;- ; ,.;' ' x / yflA , ' ••'•• X 1^.> • : -. ^ . * . x ) - • , ' •• - v • X, ?/ 7 A A ,'' ' (_ ': ' • , *^ ' v 1 - ' '/ ' X XXA. - ' '•'.. ^ l . -• . Y A , ' . X> Y \ ' Xv ^ --. GENEALOGY of the JOHN MENEFEE and MARY JAMES FAMILY in AMERICA or THE DESCENDENTS of JOHN MENEFEE who died in September or October 176f> in Culpeper Co. Va. By FERDINAND NORTHRUP MENEFEE with acknowledgement and sincere appreciation of extensive and prolonged help and research by Mr. & Mrs. Bill John Douglass and CDR. F.W.Mcintosh, M.S.C., U.S.N. Ret. A quotation favored by many genealogists is: "He who takes no interest in the history of his ancestors does not deserve to be remembered by posterity'.' Copyright (g) 1971 by Ferdinand Northrup Menefee PREFACE For many years a group of Menefee descendents have been working on the history of the Menefee family. They get no pay. They pay for their postage and stationary and typing. To America in the year Name 1622 George born in England 1625 Henry ,, 1639 William ,, I6I1I Charles ,, 1680 John of Spotsylvania; born about 1680. Location unknown. The first four names given above were in Jamestown on the dates shown. These researchers have found that the first Menefee who came to America was George Menefee. He came on the ship Samuel in December 1622 or July 1623 from Devon,England. He became a prosperous busi­ nessman, a lawyer, a member of the house of Burgeses and a colonizer. They have found that the origin of the name Menefee is not known definitely but may have, been DeMineville (French). They have given each Menefee or other person a number following the name. Though not necessarily descendents of John Menefee(1) and Mary (5), mention will be made of a few Menefees whose names show up in Virginia records following George and preceding John(l) Though the spelling of the name Menefee varies, ( a common occurance ) we will in this genealogy use the most prevalent version, Menefee. We find the name spelled Minifie, Manefee, Menefye,Manaphee and Manafield. Following George, we find a Henry Menefee testified in 1625 in Jamestown at the hearing on the release of Anthony West from inden­ ture. No further reference is found of this Henry. The record indicates that a William came in 1639, a Charles in I6I4.I, a John Menefield was in New Kent Co. in. 17&J., another or the same Menefee was in King George Co. in 1721-3. A Samuel Menefee got into the record by having his property processioned (surveyed) in llk-7 in Augusta Parish. That these Menefees dropped from sight is an indication of the uncertainty of life in early Virginia. There was sickness and there were relatively few doctors. George died in Jamestown in I61i5. The next Menefee of record was John Menefield of New Kent Co. in I70I4. mentioned above. These Menefees were followed by I4. brothers who were born in the late l600's or early 1700's all of which seems to lay a good claim that the Menefees were FFV if any one is interested. These I4 brothers were John d.1765, Jonas d.1783, William d.1797 and Gerrard d.l8ll Before going on to the John Menefee story, a little Menefee- Virginia back ground might be of interest where it involved Menefees, for Instance from William & Mary Quarterly 2 Vol. p.3, we find. George Ludlow obtained a patent July 26,l61i.6 (the year follow­ ing George Menefee's death) for lli52 acres lyeing%n York Co.( in which York town is located). Begining at the mouth of Wormley's Creek and from thence running up the river 555 poles unto certain marked trees etc., 600 acres and 750 acres called "York Plantation" purchased from George Menifee,Esq. unto whom the same was mortgaged by Sir.John Harvey. Again from William & Mary Quarterly I4. Vol.p.l5l|-. There are certain persons who believe the Byrd family had a Crown Grant title to land (Buckland) along the James River where George lived, but Colonel Byrd bought 200 acres of Mr.James Mingo x^hich was at one time part of the estate of George Menefee of Buckland adjoining. Comment by the Compiler:- George undoubtedly had the Crown Crant to this land by reason of his importation of colonists. A large brick mansion on this James River property, once owned by the Crane family of Chicago still stands, and on part of the property there is an old cemetery with one or two Byrd grave markers,none for the Menefees, but it is highly probable that George was buried there. If not he was probably burled in a some what now abandoned Church-yard, a short distance down the river. By way of introducing the Descendents of John Menefee(l) and Mary James(5) we will cite a few real estate transactions which took place in the 1700's containing names that will appear frequently in the body of the genealogy,such as the following: Culpeper Co.,Va. Records Deed Book R, page 619,23 Nov.1793, Hay Battailie of Co. of Caroline, State of Va.to Henry Menefee(22) of Co. of Culpeper,80 acfces of land. Witnesses: Joseph Strother, Anthony Hughes, William Yates, Thomas Hughes, Larkin Menefee. Compiler's note: Joseph Strother (2lj.) could have been the husband of Ann Stuart(25), and they could have been the parents of Mary Wade Strother(27) wife of William Menefee(26). Anthony and Thomas Hughes may have been brothers of Elizabeth Hughes (29) wife of John Menefee(28). Larkin Menefee could have been the son of Jonas(2) and Elizabeth(2a) or of Gerrard(3) and Agnes(3a). See location of Hughes River at bottom of Rappahannock Co. map. Deed Book TJ or V, page Ijlk, 21 Oct.1799. John Strother of Cul­ peper Co.,Va. to Henry Menefee(son of John Menefee(1) of same place, a tract of land on north-west side of Pignut Ridge containing •M- using spelling as in the record ii 93 acres west of Washington and Sperryville, Va. Compiler's note:- In 1799 Culpeper Co. took in what is now Rappahannock Co. The change took place In 1833. Pignut or Pikeral Ridge is still Pignut or Pikeral Ridge and can be seen a few miles west of Washington,Va. in the Blue Ridge mountains and Shenandoah National Park. Deed Book D.D. p.Ii2, April 1810. Hay Battailie and Ann his wife of Co. of Caroline, state of Va., to Henry Menefee of county of Cul­ peper on Firth River*and Rush River, two tracts of land,first tract containing 1227 acres and the second containing 190 acres. Witnesses:- Byrd C.Willis, John Battailie, William G.Sears, Carter L.Stevenson, William A.Gregory, Garret Minor and John W.Green. Compiler's note: Rush River source is a mile or two west of Washing­ ton, Va. See Rappahannock Co. map Deed or record of purchase between John Rogers and John Menefee Jr.(10), 17 Oct.1765. Compiler's note: John Rogers may have been related to Henry Rogers,deceased husband of Elizabeth, sister to John Menefee(1). John Rogers of Fauquire Co.,Va. for 26 pounds, 38O acres In the Fork of South Rush River. Note by Compiler: This John Jr. was undoubtedly the son of John Menefee(l) who died in the fall of 1765. John,Jr. was born In 1729, married Mildred Johnston (11). He was called Jr. while his father John(l) was living, but not John, Jr. when he sold land to John Atwood in 1793• Herewith follows a few brief Spotsylvania Co. records beginning in 1721. After l833>these Spotsylvania Records would be Rappahannock Co. records. Deed Book D. page 182 17l\2-17$l, May 1,1750. Robert True of Spotsylvania sold property. Witnesses: Philip Vincent Vase, Robert Dudley, John Menefee. Deed Book E. 1751-1765, p.195 March 2,175ii., Thomas Poole sold property in St.George Parish. Witnesses: Mathew Gayle, John Menefee, Philip Vincent Vase. Deed Book G. 1766-1771, Feb.5,1762, p.253. Benjamin Grymes and Elizabeth,his wife sold property. Witnesses: Jos.Jones, Ben Gwinn, William Menefee. Compiler's note: These deeds and records illustrate the complexity of attempting to unravel contractual relations in the 1700's from what remains of the records In county court and Parish houses.
Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5

    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5

    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
  • Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy

    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy

    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025.
  • Windows Into Our Past Vol. 2

    Windows Into Our Past Vol. 2

    WINDOWS INTO OUR PAST A Genealogy Of The Cowne, Gough & Associated Families Volume two Compiled by: Judy Parsons Smith CROSSING into and Through THE COMMONWEALTH Windows Into Our Past A GENEALOGY Of The COWNE, GOUGH & Associated FAMILIES Volume Two Compiled by: Judy Parsons Smith Please send any additions or corrections to: Judy Parsons Smith 5119 Morning Dove Mews Midlothian, VA 23112 (804) 744-4388 e-mail: [email protected] Lay-out Design by: D & J Productions Midlothian, Virginia © 1998, Judy Parsons Smith This volume is dedicated to my Sister-in-law, Elda. Knowing your ancestry is a link to your past. 2 INTRODUCTION After completing "Windows Into Our Past, Volume 1", little did I realize that I would begin volume 2 in such short order. The jumping off point for this volume was the collected genealogy of my sister-in-law, Elda Janna Cowne. Her parents had put together some of the family history and I have endeavored to "flesh it out" a bit. We have expanded on what information that they had gathered and tried to prove out family stories. Once again I have searched and picked the brains of many individuals. My special thanks to Elizabeth Robinson Cowne, grandmother of Elda Janna Cowne, and her husband William Augustine Cowne who were delightfully entertaining and informative as I completed this volume. We have found during our search the common ancestor that ties volume one to volume two -- Edward I "Longshanks". It is truly interesting to find these round about relationships. On Elda's fathers' side of the family she is related to Queen Elizabeth II of Britain, George Washington, and Robert E.
  • Montgomery County, and of Mt

    Montgomery County, and of Mt

    Historical Sketches \ 0! ( MONT GO MER Y COUNTY ) Prepared By RICHARD REID, ESQ. '• Republls'hed By The Woman's Club of Mount Sterling, Kentucky. 1926 n l 0 -:r Jnmcs M. Byrnes Compnny, l' Lexlngtou, Kentucky. 1026 I 1 ·' f.- Historical Sketch n I I Of \t) .J: \ a t u MONTGOM~RY COUNTY Prepared By RICHARD REID, ESQ. j I And I Read a t the Fourth of July Celebration, 1876. Also History of Mt. Sterling, Its Business and Bn8iness Men of To-day. _ .. · ......... · ·.· . ·: .· .. :_. .- ... : : .. .. .. .. ·.· . ·.· -.· ,,, -·- I Biographical Sketches of Some of Our Present Men. ) l ., :l G u INTRODUCTION In' compiling the following slretch of Montgomery County, and of Mt. Sterling, I am greatly indebted to Honorable B. J. Peters, Enoch Smith and James Mof­ ) fett. I also freely used a sketch of Mt. Sterling pub­ lished four years ago by Walter Gruelle; I also obtained many valuable facts from Butler's and Collins' His­ tory of Kentucky. -Thomas Calk allowed me to in­ spect some ancient papers filled with important facts. A sketch in the Courier Journal a year ago supplied me with some pleasing suggestions. The destruction by fire of the early records of the town and county, has deprived me of much valuable material. I feel this sketch is very imperfect and almost unworthy of publication. It may, however, provoke investigation and develop new facts. I trust, at least, it will serve to preserve in the memories of the coming generations what has been gathered up concerning the history of our early days.-R. R.
  • Cultural Landscapes Inventory: Piney River, Shenandoah National Park

    Cultural Landscapes Inventory: Piney River, Shenandoah National Park

    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 1999 Revised 2006 Piney River Shenandoah National Park Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Piney River Shenandoah National Park Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Cultural Landscapes Inventory – General Information The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI) is a database containing information on the historically significant landscapes within the National Park System. This evaluated inventory identifies and documents each landscape’s location, size, physical development, condition, landscape characteristics, character-defining features, as well as other valuable information useful to park management. Cultural landscapes become approved inventory records when all required data fields are entered, the park superintendent concurs with the information, and the landscape is determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places through a consultation process or is otherwise managed as a cultural resource through a public planning process. The CLI, like the List of Classified Structures (LCS), assists the National Park Service (NPS) in its efforts to fulfill the identification and management requirements associated with Section 110(a) of the National Historic Preservation Act, National Park Service Management Policies (2001), and Director’s Order #28: Cultural Resource Management. Since launching the CLI nationwide, the NPS, in response to the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA), is required to report information that respond to NPS strategic plan accomplishments. Two goals are associated with the CLI: 1) increasing the number of certified cultural landscapes (1b2B); and 2) bringing certified cultural landscapes into good condition (1a7).
  • Nomination Form

    Nomination Form

    VLR Listed: 12/4/1996 NRHP Listed: 4/28/1997 NFS Form 10-900 ! MAR * * I99T 0MB( No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) .^^oTT^Q CES United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Skyline Drive Historic District other name/site number: N/A 2. Location street & number: Shenandoah National Park (SHEN) not for publication: __ city/town: Luray vicinity: x state: VA county: Albemarle code: VA003 zip code: 22835 Augusta VA015 Greene VA079 Madison VA113 Page VA139 Rappahannock VA157 Rockingham VA165 Warren VA187 3. Classification Ownership of Property: public-Federal Category of Property: district Number of Resources within Property: Contributing Noncontributing 9 8 buildings 8 3 sites 136 67 structures 22 1 objects 175 79 Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: none Name of related multiple property listing: Historic Park Landscapes in National and State Parks 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this _x _ nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _x _ meets __^ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant x nationally __ statewide __ locally. ( __ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) _____________ Signature of certifying of ficial Date _____ ly/,a,-K OAJ.
  • A Chapter for the Canadian Beam Book) This Chapter Rewritten Apr

    A Chapter for the Canadian Beam Book) This Chapter Rewritten Apr

    South / North / West Mr. and Mrs. James A. Galloway (A chapter for the Canadian Beam book) This chapter rewritten Apr. 17, 2000 This book deals with the lives and genealogy of Abraham Beam and his nephew John Beam (Rev. Martin's son). These two men, together with their wives and children, were the pioneers of our Beam/Boehm family in Canada. But, you may ask, what about others who carried the Beam name and who left Lancaster County, PA before the Canadian pioneers? And what of other Beams left behind in Lancaster? First to leave that county was the immigrant Jacob III's son John (Abraham's brother). This John and Mary, together with their family, joined a group of Mennonites led by Henry Keagy and left Lancaster about 1766. The Keagy group left John and family in Woodstock, VA and continued on to New Market, VA. In Woodstock John purchased a small house for his family and worked as a drover, taking cattle over the Shenandoah Mts. to settlements to the west. After two years he left Woodstock and again joined Henry Keagy, who by this time had taken property along Smith Creek just east of New Market, which lies in the Shenandoah Valley, a truly beautiful location. However, John was not happy in the valley and wanted to establish himself as a miller, which was his occupation in Pennsylvania. So, he took up land by patent of 90 acres for his mill site, another 179 acres at Beahm's gap, and later another 276 acres on the Blue Ridge.
  • A History of the Daniel Boone National Forest

    A History of the Daniel Boone National Forest

    DE3DQ A HISTORY OF THE DANIEL BOONE NATIONAL FOREST A HISTORY OF THE DANIEL BOONE NATIONAL FOREST 1770- 1970 BY ROBERT F. COLLINS U.S. FOREST SERVICE - RETIRED WINCHESTER, KENTUCKY 1975 Editor Betty B. Ellison Lexington, Kentucky CHAPTER CONTENTS PAGES I Early Exploration 1 II Daniel Boone's Inspiration 1 1 III The Search 1 5 IV Through the Gap 19 V Exploring Kentucky 24 VI Kentucky Settlement Attempt 32 VII Judge Henderson's Plan 39 VIII The Treaty of Sycamore Shoals 43 IX The Boone Trace 57 X Judge Henderson Travels to Kentucky 67 XI The Transylvania Colony Established 73 XII The Transylvania Legislature 80 XIII Trouble in Kentucky 86 XTV The War Comes to Kentucky 94 XI Capture of the Salt Makers 98 XVI The Great Siege of Boonesborough 105 XVII Kentucky A State 118 XVIII More Indian Troubles 127 XIX Princess Cornblossom & "Big Jake" 136 XX The Early Iron Furnaces 146 XXI Early Traces and Roads 151 XXII Civil War Action on the Daniel Boone 164 National Forest XXIII The Rowan County War 168 XXIV Early Forests & Forest Industry in 1 74 Eastern Kentucky XXV National Interest in Kentucky's Forest 183 Lands - 1900-1930 XXVI The New Deal - Cumberland NF Established 200 XXVII Naming the New National Forest 204 XXVIII The Cumberland National Forest in 1937 210 XXIX The CCC Program on the Cumberland 215 XXX The Sublimity Project 219 XXXI The Federal-State Cooperative Wildlife Program 225 XXXII The Forest Name Change 242 XXXIII Forest Expansion - The Redbird Purchase Unit 251 XXXIV Natural Resource Controversy in Kentucky 259 ii CHAPTER CONTENTS PAGES XXXV Forest Administration - 1950-1970 280 XXXVI Continuity 324 References Consulted 325 Appendix A-G 330-349 iii INTRODUCTION This history of the Daniel Boone National Forest, and of the early settle ment of the part of Kentucky in which it lies, has been prepared primarily as a source of information for Forest Officers of the U.S.
  • Keystone XL Draft Environmental Impact Statement Appendix V

    Keystone XL Draft Environmental Impact Statement Appendix V

    Appendix V Distribution List Draft EIS Keystone XL Pipeline Project DISTRIBUTION LIST Federal Agencies Advisory Council on Historic Preservation U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of John Eddins, Washington D.C. Reclamation Vernon LaFontaine, MT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Brad Coutant, MT Darin McMurry, MT Martha Chieply, NE U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Vicki Dixon, TX Service Joel Ames s. Martha Chieply, NE Michael Romano Taylor, TX Fred Land, TX Sharon Brown, TX Cathy Juhas, MT Andrew Veech, TX Skipper Scott, TX Aaron Mahr, TX Jeff Breckenridge, SD Kristi McMillan, TX U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Keith Tillotson, NE Wildlife Service Timothy Hartsfield, OK John Cochnar, NE Jennifer Moyer, DC Tim Modde, CO Karen Kochenbach, OR Lou Haneberry, MT Kim McLaughlin, DC Mark Wilson, MT Kathy Dunn, MO Charlene Beskin, SD Dan Mulhern, KS U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Haley Dikeman, OK Larry Svoboda, CO Tom Cloud, TX Stephen Potts, NE Steve Parrish, TX Joe Cothern, KS Stephen Smith, KS U.S. Department of State Mike Jansky, TX Elizabeth Orlando, NEPA Coordinator Aimee Hessert, DC Brian Duggan, Energy Officer U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Agency Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Matthew Ponish, DC Max Kieba, DC Bennett Horter, DC Jeffery Gilliam, CO Ivan Huntoon, MO U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Steve Nanney, TX Resources Conservation Service Matthew Judy, TX Western Area Power Administration J. Cameron Loerch, NE Nick Stas, CO Claude Ross, TX Matt Marsh, MT Rod O'Sullivan, MT U.S.
  • District Sustainability Award Nominee Presentation Form U.S. Department

    District Sustainability Award Nominee Presentation Form U.S. Department

    District Sustainability Award Nominee Presentation Form CERTIFICATIONS District’s Certifications The signatures of the district superintendent on the next page certify that each of the statements below concerning the district’s eligibility and compliance with the following requirements is true and correct to the best of the superintendent’s knowledge. 1. The district has been evaluated and selected from among districts within the Nominating Authority’s jurisdiction, based on high achievement in the three ED-GRS Pillars: 1) reduced environmental impact and costs; 2) improved health and wellness; and 3) effective environmental and sustainability education. 2. The district is providing the U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights (OCR) access to information necessary to investigate a civil rights complaint or to conduct a district wide compliance review. 3. OCR has not issued a violation letter of findings to the school district concluding that the nominated school district has violated one or more of the civil rights statutes. A violation letter of findings will not be considered outstanding if OCR has accepted a corrective action plan to remedy the violation. 4. The U.S. Department of Justice does not have a pending suit alleging that the school district has violated one or more of the civil rights statutes or the Constitution’s equal protection clause. 5. There are no findings of violations of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in a U.S. Department of Education monitoring report that apply to the school district in question; or if there are such findings, the state or school district has corrected, or agreed to correct, the findings.
  • Congressional Record-Senate. 8557

    Congressional Record-Senate. 8557

    1894. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. 8557 citizens or .Kansas City, Kans., agau~st appropriating public remonstrating against the support of the Government in main· money for sectarian purposes-to the Committee on Indian AI- taining the present system of sectarian Indian education, etc.; fairs. which were referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs. By Mr. COFFEEN (by request): Petition of 100 American Railway Union members of Uinta County, Wyo., asking for im- EXCLUSION AND DEPORTATION OF ALIEN ANARCillSTS. peachment proceedings-to the Committee on the Judiciary. Mr. HILL. I ask unanimous consent to call up for present By Mr. ENLOE: Papers to accompany the bill for the relief consideration the bill (S. 2314) to provide for the exclusion and of Daniels Cupples, Claiborne Wilson, J. B. King, and R. A. deportation of alien anarchists. Mitchell-to the Committee on Military Affairs. 'l'he VICE-PRESIDENT. The bill will be read for informa. By Mr. JOHNSON of North Dakota: Petition of Samuel Moore tion. and 54 other citizens of Grand Forks County, N. Dak., residing The Secretary proceeded to read the bill. near Turtle River, asking that John R. G. Karlen be relieved of Mr. CALL. I do not wish to interfere with the Senator from the contest now pending against his free claim, viz, the north- New York, but this seems to be a very long bill, and it will west quarter of section 8, township 154, range 51, and that he be probably occupy some time. allowed to prove up on said land-to the Committee on the Pub- Mr.
  • Flauquier County, Virginia

    Flauquier County, Virginia

    C~eology of the Marshall Quadrangle, Flauquier County, Virginia By Gilbert H. Espenshade U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1560 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1986 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Espenshade, Gilbert H. (Gilbert Howry), 1912- Geology of the Marshall Quadrangle, Fauquier County, Virginia. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1560) Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1560) 1. Geology-Virginia-Fauquier County. I. Title. II. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1560 557.3 s [557.55'275] 84--600118 [QE174.F38] For sale by the Book and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 <XNTENTS Page P\bstract • • . • . • . • . • • . • . • • . • . • 1 Introduction • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 c;eneral geology • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 3 Middle Proterozoic rocks • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 5 Marshall Metagranite • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 5 Late Proterozoic rocks . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 7 Fauquier Formation • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 7 General features • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 7 Meta-arkose and metaconglomerate. • • • • • • • 8 Meta-arkose and metasiltstone • • • • • • • • • • • 9 Metarhythmite and dolomitic rock ••••••••• 10 Soils . 11 Regional stratigraphic relations ••••••••••• 12 Catoctin Formation ••••••••••••••••••••••