DOCSLIB.ORG

Annex Itoci8: Idea/Ideation, Evolution and Assimilation Phase Open Source Software Tools

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annex Itoci8: Idea/Ideation, Evolution and Assimilation Phase Open Source Software Tools FOSTERING INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTORS OF THE ARAB REGION ANNEX ITOCI8: IDEA/IDEATION, EVOLUTION AND ASSIMILATION PHASE OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE TOOLS CONTENTS I. Catalogue of IDEA/Ideation Phase Open Source Software Tools for Collaboration .............. 3 II. Catalogue of IDEA/Ideation Phase Open Source Software Tools for Idea Management ....... 5 III. Catalogue of IDEA/Ideation Phase Open Source Software Tools for Data Visualization ...... 6 IV. Catalogue of IDEA/Ideation Phase Open Source Software Tools for Employee Engagement .............................................................................................................................. 8 V. Catalogue of IDEA/Ideation Phase Open Source Software Tools for Gamification ............... 9 VI. Catalogue of IDEA/Evolution Phase Open Source Software Tools for Project Management ........................................................................................................................... 10 VII. Catalogue of IDEA/Evolution Phase Open Source Software Tools for Performance Appraisal ................................................................................................................................ 14 VIII. Catalogue of IDEA/Evolution Phase Open Source Software Tools for Knowledge Management ........................................................................................................................... 15 IX. Catalogue of IDEA/Evolution Phase Open Source Software Tools for IT Management ........................................................................................................................... 19 X. Catalogue of IDEA/Evolution Phase Open Source Software Tools for Data Governance............................................................................................................................. 24 XI. Catalogue of IDEA/Evolution Phase Open Source Software Tools for Process Management ........................................................................................................................... 25 XII. Catalogue of IDEA/Evolution Phase Open Source Software Tools for Performance Management ........................................................................................................................... 28 XIII. Catalogue of IDEA/Assimilation Phase Open Source Software Tools for Online Community ............................................................................................................................. 29 XIV. Catalogue of IDEA/Assimilation Phase Open Source Software Tools for Social Media Management ........................................................................................................................... 31 XV. Catalogue of IDEA/Assimilation Phase Open Source Software Tools for Advocacy ........... 32 XVI. Catalogue of IDEA/Assimilation Phase Open Source Software Tools for Feedback Management ........................................................................................................................... 32 XVII. Notes on the meaning and valuation of catalogued metadata ................................................ 35 2 I. CATALOGUE OF IDEA/IDEATION PHASE OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE TOOLS FOR COLLABORATION 1 | IDEA lifecyle phase [1], [2] : Ideation | IDEA lifecycle category [1], [2] : Collaboration | product name [3], [4], [5] : Alfresco Community Edition | provider name [6] : Alfresco | provider home website: alfresco.com | product webpage: https://www.alfresco.com/alfresco-community-editions | product home website [7] : alfresco.com | more information (OSS directory provider webpage): https://sourceforge.net/projects/alfresco/ | more information (academic references max 3 y.o.) [8] : https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Alfresco+Community+Edition+alfresco.com&as_ylo=2015 | no. of results [9], [10] : within 70. 2 | IDEA lifecyle phase [1], [2] : Ideation | IDEA lifecycle category [1], [2] : Collaboration | product name [3], [4], [5] : Apache OpenOffice | provider name [6] : OpenOffice.org | provider home website: openoffice.org | product webpage: http://www.openoffice.org/ | product home website [7] : openoffice.org | more information (OSS directory provider webpage): https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ | more information (academic references max 3 y.o.) [8] : https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Apache+OpenOffice+openoffice.org&as_ylo=2015 | no. of results [9], [10] : within 400. 3 | IDEA lifecyle phase [1], [2] : Ideation | IDEA lifecycle category [1], [2] : Collaboration | product name [3], [4], [5] : Atlassian Confluence | provider name [6] : Atlassian | provider home website: atlassian.com | product webpage: https://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence | product home website [7] : atlassian.com | more information (OSS directory provider webpage): GetApp / OSS Web Collaboration | more information (academic references max 3 y.o.) [8] : https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Atlassian+Confluence+atlassian.com&as_ylo=2015 | no. of results [9], [10] : within 300. 4 | IDEA lifecyle phase [1], [2] : Ideation | IDEA lifecycle category [1], [2] : Collaboration | product name [3], [4], [5] : Blackboard Collaborate | provider name [6] : Blackboard | provider home website: blackboard.com | product webpage: http://www.blackboard.com/online-collaborative-learning/blackboard-collaborate.aspx | product home website [7] : blackboard.com | more information (OSS directory provider webpage): GetApp / OSS Web Collaboration | more information (academic references max 3 y.o.) [8] : https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Blackboard+Collaborate+blackboard.com&as_ylo=2015 | no. of results [9], [10] : within 700. 5 | IDEA lifecyle phase [1], [2] : Ideation | IDEA lifecycle category [1], [2] : Collaboration | product name [3], [4], [5] : Bloomfire | provider name [6] : Bloomfire | provider home website: bloomfire.com | product webpage: https://bloomfire.com/product/ | product home website [7] : bloomfire.com | more information (OSS directory provider webpage): GetApp / OSS Web Collaboration | more information (academic references max 3 y.o.) [8] : https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Bloomfire+bloomfire.com&as_ylo=2015 | no. of results [9], [10] : within 20. 6 | IDEA lifecyle phase [1], [2] : Ideation | IDEA lifecycle category [1], [2] : Collaboration | product name [3], [4], [5] : Feng Office | provider name [6] : fengoffice.com | provider home website: fengoffice.com | product webpage: http://www.fengoffice.com/web/ | product home website [7] : fengoffice.com | more information (OSS directory provider webpage): GetApp / OSS Web Collaboration | more information (academic references max 3 y.o.) [8] : https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Feng+Office+fengoffice.com&as_ylo=2015 | no. of results [9], [10] : within 10. 7 | IDEA lifecyle phase [1], [2] : Ideation | IDEA lifecycle category [1], [2] : Collaboration | product name [3], [4], [5] : Foswiki | provider name [6] : Foswiki.org | provider home website: foswiki.org | product webpage: http://foswiki.org/About/WebHome | product home website [7] : foswiki.org | more information (OSS directory provider webpage): https://sourceforge.net/projects/foswiki/ | more information (academic references max 3 y.o.) [8] : https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Foswiki+foswiki.org&as_ylo=2015 | no. of results [9], [10] : within 20. 3 8 | IDEA lifecyle phase [1], [2] : Ideation | IDEA lifecycle category [1], [2] : Collaboration | product name [3], [4], [5] : Group Office | provider name [6] : Intermesh BV | provider home website: intermesh.nl | product webpage: https://www.group-office.com/#features | product home website [7] : group-office.com | more information (OSS directory provider webpage): https://sourceforge.net/projects/group-office/ | more information (academic references max 3 y.o.) [8] : https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Group+Office+group- office.com&as_ylo=2015 | no. of results [9], [10] : within 10. 9 | IDEA lifecyle phase [1], [2] : Ideation | IDEA lifecycle category [1], [2] : Collaboration | product name [3], [4], [5] : Loomio | provider name [6] : Loomio Cooperative Limited | provider home website: loomio.org | product webpage: https://www.loomio.org/#features | product home website [7] : loomio.org | more information (OSS directory provider webpage): GetApp / OSS Web Collaboration | more information (academic references max 3 y.o.) [8] : https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Loomio+loomio.org&as_ylo=2015 | no. of results [9], [10] : within 50. 10 | IDEA lifecyle phase [1], [2] : Ideation | IDEA lifecycle category [1], [2] : Collaboration | product name [3], [4], [5] : ONLYOFFICE | provider name [6] : Ascensio System SIA | provider home website: onlyoffice.com | product webpage: https://www.onlyoffice.com/apps.aspx | product home website [7] : onlyoffice.com | more information (OSS directory provider webpage): https://sourceforge.net/projects/teamlab/ | more information (academic references max 3 y.o.) [8] : https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=ONLYOFFICE+onlyoffice.com&as_ylo=2015 | no. of results [9], [10] : within 20. 11 | IDEA lifecyle phase [1], [2] : Ideation | IDEA lifecycle category [1], [2] : Collaboration | product name [3], [4], [5] : ONLYOFFICE | provider name [6] : Ascensio System SIA | provider home website: onlyoffice.com | product webpage: https://www.onlyoffice.com/apps.aspx | product home website [7] : onlyoffice.com | more information (OSS directory provider webpage): https://sourceforge.net/projects/desktopeditors/ | more information (academic references max 3 y.o.) [8] : https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=ONLYOFFICE+onlyoffice.com&as_ylo=2015
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Secure Implementation of Blogs, Wikis, and Second Life
    Project Code: MQP-BXT-0701 Secure Implementation of Blogs, Wikis, and Second Life A Major Qualifying Project Report Submitted To the Faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science Written By: Approved By: Angela L. Burrows Prof. Bengisu Tulu, Project Advisor Stephen J. King Stefan R. Rashkov Date: February 29, 2008 Sponsored By: Roland Cloutier Howard Hantman EMC Corporation TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................ i Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................ii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ vii Authorship ........................................................................................................................ viii 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Problem Statement ........................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 3 2 Background ................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 EMC Background ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Common Tools for Team Collaboration Problem: Working with a Team (Especially Remotely) Can Be Difficult
    Common Tools for Team Collaboration Problem: Working with a team (especially remotely) can be difficult. ▹ Team members might have a different idea for the project ▹ Two or more team members could end up doing the same work ▹ Or a few team members have nothing to do Solutions: A combination of few tools. ▹ Communication channels ▹ Wikis ▹ Task manager ▹ Version Control ￭ We’ll be going in depth with this one! Important! The tools are only as good as your team uses them. Make sure all of your team members agree on what tools to use, and train them thoroughly! Communication Channels Purpose: Communication channels provide a way to have team members remotely communicate with one another. Ideally, the channel will attempt to emulate, as closely as possible, what communication would be like if all of your team members were in the same office. Wait, why not email? ▹ No voice support ￭ Text alone is not a sufficient form of communication ▹ Too slow, no obvious support for notifications ▹ Lack of flexibility in grouping people Tools: ▹ Discord ￭ discordapp.com ▹ Slack ￭ slack.com ▹ Riot.im ￭ about.riot.im Discord: Originally used for voice-chat for gaming, Discord provides: ▹ Voice & video conferencing ▹ Text communication, separated by channels ▹ File-sharing ▹ Private communications ▹ A mobile, web, and desktop app Slack: A business-oriented text communication that also supports: ▹ Everything Discord does, plus... ▹ Threaded conversations Riot.im: A self-hosted, open-source alternative to Slack Wikis Purpose: Professionally used as a collaborative game design document, a wiki is a synchronized documentation tool that retains a thorough history of changes that occured on each page.
    [Show full text]
  • Návrh a Implementace Rozšíření Do Systému Phabricator
    Masarykova univerzita Fakulta informatiky Návrh a implementace rozšíření do systému Phabricator Diplomová práce Lukáš Jagoš Brno, podzim 2019 Masarykova univerzita Fakulta informatiky Návrh a implementace rozšíření do systému Phabricator Diplomová práce Lukáš Jagoš Brno, podzim 2019 Na tomto místě se v tištěné práci nachází oficiální podepsané zadání práce a prohlášení autora školního díla. Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že tato diplomová práce je mým původním autorským dílem, které jsem vypracoval samostatně. Všechny zdroje, prameny a literaturu, které jsem při vypracování používal nebo z nich čerpal, v práci řádně cituji s uvedením úplného odkazu na příslušný zdroj. Lukáš Jagoš Vedoucí práce: Martin Komenda i Poděkování Srdečně chci na tomto místě poděkovat vedoucímu mé diplomové práce RNDr. Martinu Komendovi, Ph.D. za cenné náměty a odborné vedení. Dále chci poděkovat Mgr. Matěji Karolyi za všestrannou po- moc při implementaci praktické části práce a Ing. Mgr. Janu Krejčímu za zpřístupnění testovacího serveru a technickou podporu. iii Shrnutí Diplomová práce se zabývá nástroji pro projektové řízení. V teore- tické části jsou vymezeny pojmy projekt a projektové řízení. Poté jsou představeny vybrané softwarové nástroje pro projektové řízení a je provedeno jejich srovnání. Pozornost je zaměřena na systém Phabrica- tor, který je v práci detailně popsán. V praktické části je navrženo rozšíření Phabricatoru na základě analýzy potřeb a sběru požadavků. Výsledkem je rozšířující modul po- skytující přehledné informace o úkolech z pohledu času a náročnosti, čímž zefektivní jejich plánování a proces týmové spolupráce. iv Klíčová slova projektové řízení, Phabricator, PHP, reportovací modul, SCRUM v Obsah 1 Projektové řízení 3 1.1 Projekt a projektové řízení ..................3 1.2 SW nástroje pro projektové řízení ...............4 1.3 Přehled nástrojů z oblasti řízení projektů ...........6 1.3.1 Phabricator .
    [Show full text]
  • Project Management Software March 2019
    PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE MARCH 2019 Powered by Methodology CONTENTS 3 Introduction 5 Defining Project Management Software 6 FrontRunners (Small Vendors) 8 FrontRunners (Enterprise Vendors) 10 Runners Up 22 Methodology Basics 2 INTRODUCTION his FrontRunners analysis minimum qualifying score of 3.96 Tis a data-driven assessment for Usability and 3.91 for User identifying products in the Project Recommended, while the Small Management software market that Vendor graphic had a minimum offer the best capability and value qualifying score of 4.55 for Usability for small businesses. For a given and 4.38 for User Recommended. market, products are evaluated and given a score for Usability (x-axis) To be considered for the Project and User Recommended (y-axis). Management FrontRunners, a FrontRunners then plots 10-15 product needed a minimum of 20 products each on a Small Vendor user reviews published within 18 and an Enterprise Vendor graphic, months of the evaluation period. based on vendor business size, per Products needed a minimum user category. rating score of 3.0 for both Usability and User Recommended in both In the Project Management the Small and Enterprise graphics. FrontRunners infographic, the Enterprise Vendor graphic had a 3 INTRODUCTION The minimum score cutoff to be included in the FrontRunners graphic varies by category, depending on the range of scores in each category. No product with a score less than 3.0 in either dimension is included in any FrontRunners graphic. For products included, the Usability and User Recommended scores determine their positions on the FrontRunners graphic. 4 DEFINING PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE roject management software and document management, as well Phelps organizations manage as at least one of the following: time and deliver projects on time, on tracking, budgeting, and resource budget and within scope.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaboration and Social Media-2008
    Research Report Collaboration and Social Media-2008 Taking Stock of Today’s Experiences and Tomorrow’s Opportunities Geoffrey Bock Steve Paxhia The Gilbane Group June 9, 2008 Gilbane Group Inc. 763 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 USA Tel: 617.497.9443 Fax: 617.497.5256 [email protected] http://gilbane.com With Thanks to Our Sponsors Platinum Gold Silver ©2008 Gilbane Group, Inc. i http://gilbane.com Collaboration and Social Media — 2008 Table of Contents With Thanks to Our Sponsors .................................................................................. i Our Perspective ................................................................................. vi How American Companies Use Social Media ....................................... i Tracking Social Media ............................................................................................. 2 Adopting Social Media .............................................................................................. 5 Social Media Profiles .............................................................................................. 10 A Social Media Roadmap ....................................................................................... 30 Customer Stories ............................................................................. 32 Awareness at Earth Knowledge ............................................................................. 33 EMC Documentum eRoom at Bechtel ................................................................... 36 EMC Documentum eRoom
    [Show full text]
  • Download Projectlibre
    Download projectlibre click here to download ProjectLibre is project management software, an alternative to Microsoft Project. Intervals by Pelago is a Project Management tool that provides easy-to-use time and progress tools. Corecon is a fully-integrated estimating, project management, job costing, and scheduling platform. ProjectLibre - Project Management Icon Slackware and distributions not using rpm or deb: download www.doorway.ru Source. ProjectLibre is the leading open source alternative to Microsoft Project. It has been downloaded over 3,, times in over countries and has won. ProjectLibre Cloud. Like Google Docs but replacing MS Project DOWNLOADED We are trusted by. The world's leading organizations using ProjectLibre. Download ProjectLibre for Windows now from Softonic: % safe and virus free. More than downloads this month. Download ProjectLibre latest version. ProjectLibre, free and safe download. ProjectLibre latest version: An organized project tracker. It can be difficult to keep track and monitor multiple projects at a. ProjectLibre is the leading open source alternative to Microsoft Project. ProjectLibre is compatible with Microsoft Project , and ProjectLibre. Free Download 74,82 MB. Reliable alternative for Microsoft Project". A review by Flo. Microsoft did very well in introducing tools in. Free download page for Project ProjectLibre Project Management's projectlibre- www.doorway.rutLibre is an open source alternative to Microsoft Project. Free Download ProjectLibre - A useful project solution whose main purpose is to help users who need to quickly plan and schedule new. ProjectLibre is considered one of the best open source project Once you have downloaded and installed ProjectLibre, you should see a. ProjectLibre is a free and open-source project management software system intended .
    [Show full text]
  • The Opendaylight Open Source Project
    UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS Master´ Universitario en Software Libre Curso Academico´ 2014/2015 Proyecto Fin de Master´ The OpenDaylight Open Source Project Autor: Sergio Najib Arroutbi Braojos Tutor: Dr. Gregorio Robles 2 Agradecimientos A mi familia y a mi pareja, por su apoyo incondicional Al equipo de Libresoft de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, por su afan´ en ensenar˜ el que´ y el porque´ del Software Libre Dedicatoria Para todos aquellos´ que hacen posible el fenomeno´ del Software Libre 4 (C) 2014 Sergio Najib Arroutbi Braojos. Some rights reserved. This document is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license, available in http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Source files for this document are available at http://github.com/sarroutbi/MFP/opendaylight/ 6 Contents 1 Introduction 19 1.1 Terminology.................................... 19 1.1.1 Open Source Programmable Networking................ 19 1.2 About this document............................... 20 1.2.1 Document structure............................ 20 1.2.2 Scope................................... 21 1.2.3 Methodology............................... 21 2 Goals and Objectives 23 2.1 General Objectives................................ 23 2.2 Subobjectives................................... 23 2.2.1 Acquire competence on OpenDaylight project.............. 23 2.2.2 Analyze OpenDaylight project from an Open Source perspective.... 24 2.2.3 Statistics and measures of the OpenDaylight project.......... 24 3 OpenDaylight: A first view 25 3.1 OpenDaylight Project............................... 25 3.2 SDN........................................ 29 3.2.1 What is SDN?.............................. 29 3.2.2 SDN: Market share and expectations................... 31 3.3 NFV........................................ 34 3.3.1 What is NFV?.............................. 35 3.3.2 SDN/NFV relationship.......................... 36 3.3.3 NFV benefits..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Customization of an Enterprise Request Management System
    ISSN (Online) 2393-8021 ISSN (Print) 2394-1588 International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 2, Issue 2, February 2015 Customization of an Enterprise request Management System 1 2 3 4 Ashna Shah , Chinmay Balutkar , Bhargavee Singh , Rajesh. B. Singh Student, Computer Department, Sinhgad Institute Of technology, Lonavala, India 1,2,3 Associate Professor, Computer Department, Sinhgad Institute Of technology, Lonavala, India4 Abstract: Information provided in issue reports are relevant and complete in order to help resolve issues quickly. However, often such information trickles to developers after several iterations of communication between End user and reporters. This paper addresses the concerns of Customization of an Enterprise management system by proposing for handling of the issues such as bugs, query and enhancements. As a proof-of-concept, we also demonstrate a prototype interactive enterprise request management system that gathers relevant information from the user and identifies files that need to be fixed to resolve the issues. The main contribution of this application is in the domain of business as we are developing Enterprise request Management System. Keywords: Bugs, Issues, query, enhancement. I. INTRODUCTION The use of Enterprise Request Management Systems as a to the issue and again will report the issue to the reporter. tool to organize maintenance activities is widespread. The Developer then will handle the issues and will fix them. systems serve as a central repository for monitoring the This system will help to manage the issues in the business progress of issue reports, requesting additional information domain by fixing them. The issues might be a bug, query from reporters, and discussing potential solutions for or the enhancement.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Power on BPM - a Comparison of Jboss Jbpm and Intalio BPMS
    Open Source Power on BPM - A Comparison of JBoss jBPM and Intalio BPMS Pin Nie, Riku Seppälä, Måns Hafrén T-86.5161 Special Course in Information Systems Integration Abstract. This paper presents a comparison of two open source products in Business Process Management: Intalio BPMS and JBoss jBPM. A framework for their comparison is constructed based on expert advice and a literature analysis. We implemented a simple process with both tools to gather experience of using the tools and combined this knowledge with information from official documentation, tutorials, research and any available third-party documentation. With this knowledge, the two tools were compared using the comparison framework. In the end, we score the two tools across the categories identified in the comparison framework and provide further discussion for future work. Keywords: BPMS, BPM, jBPM, Intalio, JBoss, Redhat, evaluation, comparison framework, open source 1 Introduction Business Process Management (BPM) is gaining increasing attention and consideration in organization and enterprise architecture as a bridge between information technology (IT) and business. BPM is a holistic management approach that promotes business effectiveness and flexibility on the basis of a set of standardized IT technologies and tools. The technology solutions that address the need for BPM are called Business Process Management Systems (or suites), or BPMS. There are various definitions for Business Process Management (Smith & Fingar, 2003; Hill et al., 2006). A recent and influential definition is given by Mathias Weske: “A business process management system is a generic software system that is driven by explicit process representations to coordinate the enactment of business process.” (Weske, 2007) However, most of the BPM tools and software employed today are expensive commercial products.
    [Show full text]
  • Projectlibre – Ferramenta De Gerenciamento De Projetos 78
    Editorial EDITORES Eliane Domingos de Sousa Vera Cavalcante Bom para tudo, bom para todos REDATORES A cada atualização do LibreOffice e descobrindo o que é possível fazer Barbara Samel R. Tostes com ele através dos artigos e dicas que veiculamos a cada bimestre, não Camila da Silva Oliveira Claudionei de Aguiar podemos deixar de parafrasear o slogan de uma entidade bancária, Carlos Karnas acrescentando mais alguma coisa: “O LibreOffice é bom para tudo e é Douglas Braga Silva bom para todos”. Eliane Domingos de Sousa Convite de casamento, planilhas com qualidade, sublinhado colorido Ítalo Vignoli João Dinaldo Kzam Gama em textos, prefixo personalizado para novas planilhas, remover fundo Júlio Neves branco de imagens JPEG, são as dicas e tutoriais do LibreOffice escritas Klaibson Ribeiro por pessoas que apoiam a ferramenta e que, não se furtam de repassar Rodolfo Avelino conhecimento e que nos permitem perceber a qualidade e facilidade de Rogério Alves se trabalhar com essa ferramenta. Além de estar constantemente em Valson da Silva Pereira desenvolvimento, como você pode ver no artigo sobre as novidades da TRADUÇÃO versão 4.2, tem fãs que não se abstêm de dar o seu recado, na nova David Jourdain seção que você verá nessa edição. “Dê o seu recado” é para dizer o que João Mac-Cormik de bom você percebe no LibreOffice. Olivier Hallot E além de usuários satisfeitos, temos um artigo sobre um projeto de REVISÃO Estado, que possibilitou ao LibreOffice ser homologado como aplicativo Douglas Braga Silva padrão a ser utilizado nos órgãos de governo do Rio Grande do Sul.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software
    Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software June 2013 INDUSTRY REPORT INSIDE THIS ISSUE Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software 1. Introduction INTRODUCTION 2. Market Trends This report focuses on technologies for collaboration and socialization within the enterprise. A number of forces are currently playing out in the enterprise IT 3. Competitive Landscape environment that are creating an inflection in the adoption and deployment of social and collaboration technologies. This significant uptrend has provided strong 4. M&A Activity growth for the sector and is driving a substantial amount of M&A and investment activity. This report includes a review of the recent M&A and private investing 5. Private Financings activities in enterprise social and collaboration software, particularly within the areas of group collaboration & workspaces, private social platforms, project and 6. Valution Trends social task management, event scheduling, web collaboration, white boarding & diagramming, and other related technologies. We have also profiled about 50 emerging private players in these subcategories to provide an overview of the 7. Emerging Private Companies breadth and diversity of the players targeting this sector. OVERVIEW Socialization and collaboration technologies are currently reshaping the established enterprise collaboration market as well as creating whole new categories of offerings, especially around private social platforms. In addition, many other enterprise applications such as CRM and unified communications are heavily transformed through the incorporation of new technologies including group messaging & activity feeds, document collaboration, and analytics. Much of this change is being driven by the consumerization of IT and the incorporation of social technologies. As businesses look to leverage the benefits of improved “connecting” and “network building” that employees have experienced with Facebook and other social solutions, a convergence is occurring between the enterprise social software and collaboration markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Adding Awareness to a Software Forge: Development of the TITANS Approach and Lessons Learnt in Participating in an Apache Open Source Development Process
    Politecnico di Milano Scuola di Ingegneria dell'Informazione Corso di Laurea in Ingegneria Informatica Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria Adding Awareness to a Software Forge: Development of the TITANS Approach and Lessons Learnt in Participating in an Apache Open Source Development Process Relatore: Prof. Elisabetta Di Nitto Correlatori: Dr. Roberto Galoppini Dr. Damian Andrew Tamburri Tesi di Laurea di: Simone Gatti matr. 770756 Stefano Invernizzi matr. 765873 Anno Accademico 2012-2013 Alle nostre famiglie e a tutte le persone a noi care, che ci hanno sostenuti e incoraggiati per tutta la durata del nostro percorso di studi e che hanno reso possibile il raggiungimento di questo importante traguardo. Desideriamo innanzitutto ringraziare la professoressa Elisabetta Di Nitto, che in questi mesi ci ha supportati nell'elaborare la nostra tesi e che ci ha guidati con i suoi preziosi insegnamenti. Un ringraziamento speciale al dottor Roberto Galoppini, per averci in- trodotti al mondo dell'open source e per aver condiviso con noi la sua es- perienza, grazie alla quale abbiamo potuto relazionarci efficacemente con la comunit`adi Allura. Ringraziamo inoltre il dottor Damian Andrew Tamburri, per averci in- trodotto le sue brillanti idee e per averci consentito di partecipare allo sviluppo di quella che riteniamo un'importante ricerca. Un ringraziamento a tutta la comunit`adi Allura, che ci ha sempre di- mostrato una grande disponibilit`ae che ha accolto, stimolato e fatto crescere il nostro lavoro. Infine, grazie a tutti coloro che hanno condiviso con noi questo percorso, tra le gioie e le fatiche dello studio e dei tanti progetti universitari, rendendo indimenticabili questi anni trascorsi tra le aule e la segreteria.
    [Show full text]