Regulation of Axon Guidance Receptor Expression and Activity During Neuronal Morphogenesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regulation of Axon Guidance Receptor Expression and Activity During Neuronal Morphogenesis University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2016 Regulation Of Axon Guidance Receptor Expression And Activity During Neuronal Morphogenesis Celine Santiago University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Developmental Biology Commons, Genetics Commons, and the Neuroscience and Neurobiology Commons Recommended Citation Santiago, Celine, "Regulation Of Axon Guidance Receptor Expression And Activity During Neuronal Morphogenesis" (2016). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2568. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2568 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2568 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Regulation Of Axon Guidance Receptor Expression And Activity During Neuronal Morphogenesis Abstract Receptors expressed on the surface of neurons during development direct cell migration, axon guidance, dendrite morphogenesis, and synapse formation by responding to cues in the neuron’s environment. The expression levels and the activity of cell surface receptors must be tightly controlled for a neuron to acquire its unique identity. Transcriptional mechanisms are essential in this process, and many studies have identified requirements for specific transcription factors during the different steps of neural circuit assembly. However, the downstream effectors by which most of these factors control morphology and connectivity remain unknown. In Chapter 1, I highlight recent work that elucidated functional relationships between transcription factors and the cellular effectors through which they regulate neural morphogenesis and synaptogenesis in multiple model systems. In Chapters 2 and 3, I present data demonstrating that the homeodomain transcription factors Hb9 and Islet control motor axon guidance in Drosophila embryos through distinct effectors: Hb9 regulates the (Roundabout) 2 receptor in a subset of motor neurons, while Islet acts in the same cells to regulate the Frazzled/DCC receptor. Genetic rescue experiments indicate that these relationships are functionally important for the guidance of motor axons to their muscle targets. In addition, Islet regulates motor neuron dendrite targeting in the central nervous system (CNS) through Frazzled, demonstrating how an individual transcription factor can control multiple aspects of neuronal connectivity through the same effector. In Chapter 4, I characterize a non-canonical function for the Robo2 receptor during midline crossing, and present data suggesting that this activity requires Robo2 to be expressed in midline cells, providing an example of how mechanisms that regulate guidance receptor gene expression are key to regulating receptor function and nervous system formation. In Chapter 5, I explore the implications of these findings, and propose future directions of research to build upon them. Degree Type Dissertation Degree Name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Graduate Group Cell & Molecular Biology First Advisor Greg J. Bashaw Keywords Axon guidance, Frazzled, Homeodomain proteins, Motor neurons, Roundabout Subject Categories Developmental Biology | Genetics | Neuroscience and Neurobiology This dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2568 REGULATION OF AXON GUIDANCE RECEPTOR EXPRESSION AND ACTIVITY DURING NEURONAL MORPHOGENESIS Celine Santiago A DISSERTATION in Cell and Molecular Biology Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2016 Supervisor of Dissertation ___________________________________ Greg J. Bashaw, Professor of Neuroscience Graduate Group Chairperson _______________________ Daniel Kessler, Associate Professor of Cell and Developmental Biology Dissertation Committee: Stephen DiNardo, Professor of Cell and Developmental Biology Wenqin Luo, Assistant Professor of Neuroscience Jonathan Raper, Professor of Neuroscience Meera Sundaram, Associate Professor of Genetics ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the members of the Bashaw lab for their mentorship, support, and friendship throughout the years. In particular, I thank Greg for having created a stimulating research environment where curiosity and critical thinking are always encouraged. Our many conversations over the years helped me communicate more clearly and think more deeply about science, and were a major part of my growth and of the joy of working in the lab. I am also very grateful for all his encouragement, which gave me the confidence to get past disappointments, and to push myself to try new things, and for his relentless advocacy and support for me as I prepare to move on to the next stage of my career. I thank Alexandra and Mike for having been such great mentors and friends. I am a better scientist for having worked by their side, and they continue to inspire me to be more ambitious and thoughtful. A special thank you to Alexandra for her wisdom and thoughtful words every time I needed advice. Thanks to Melissa for having shared all the milestones of graduate school with me, from the early days of our rotation to proof- reading each other’s papers. I thank Tim and Elise for a productive collaboration on the Robo2 pro-crossing project, and all the other members of the Bashaw lab for having made it such a fun place to work. I would also like to thank the members of my thesis committee for their advice and mentorship, both about experiments and about my career. I am also grateful for the guidance of mentors from before grad school: Daniel Wagner, for a wonderful ii undergraduate research experience that led me down this path; and Robert Dennison and Deborah Crawford, for sharing their passion and curiosity about the natural world with their students. Last but not least I would like to thank all of my other friends and family, especially Julie, for having been by my side through all the adventures of the past six years, and Michael, for his unwavering support and sense of humor. I thank my brother and my sister in law for their friendship and advice, especially during interviews in the past year. Finally, I thank my parents, to whom I dedicate this thesis. They did everything they could to help me and my brother find our paths, and their perseverance and courage in difficult moments throughout their own lives showed me how important it is to always keep trying. iii ABSTRACT REGULATION OF AXON GUIDANCE RECEPTOR EXPRESSION AND ACTIVITY DURING NEURONAL MORPHOGENESIS Celine Santiago Greg J. Bashaw Receptors expressed on the surface of neurons during development direct cell migration, axon guidance, dendrite morphogenesis, and synapse formation by responding to cues in the neuron’s environment. The expression levels and the activity of cell surface receptors must be tightly controlled for a neuron to acquire its unique identity. Transcriptional mechanisms are essential in this process, and many studies have identified requirements for specific transcription factors during the different steps of neural circuit assembly. However, the downstream effectors by which most of these factors control morphology and connectivity remain unknown. In Chapter 1, I highlight recent work that elucidated functional relationships between transcription factors and the cellular effectors through which they regulate neural morphogenesis and synaptogenesis in multiple model systems. In Chapters 2 and 3, I present data demonstrating that the homeodomain transcription factors Hb9 and Islet control motor axon guidance in Drosophila embryos through distinct effectors: Hb9 regulates the (Roundabout) 2 receptor in a subset of motor neurons, while Islet acts in the same cells to regulate the Frazzled/DCC receptor. Genetic rescue experiments indicate that these relationships are functionally important for the guidance of motor axons to their muscle targets. In iv addition, Islet regulates motor neuron dendrite targeting in the central nervous system (CNS) through Frazzled, demonstrating how an individual transcription factor can control multiple aspects of neuronal connectivity through the same effector. In Chapter 4, I characterize a non-canonical function for the Robo2 receptor during midline crossing, and present data suggesting that this activity requires Robo2 to be expressed in midline cells, providing an example of how mechanisms that regulate guidance receptor gene expression are key to regulating receptor function and nervous system formation. In Chapter 5, I explore the implications of these findings, and propose future directions of research to build upon them. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................... II ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... IV LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ......................................................................................... IX PREFACE ...................................................................................................................... XII CHAPTER 1 ...................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION: TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS AND EFFECTORS THAT REGULATE AXON GUIDANCE, DENDRITE MORPHOLOGY, AND SYNAPTOGENESIS IN THE DEVELOPING NERVOUS SYSTEM ......................
Recommended publications
  • Cloning and Functional Studies of a Novel Gene Aberrantly Expressed in RB-Deficient Embryos
    Developmental Biology 207, 62–75 (1999) Article ID dbio.1998.9141, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Cloning and Functional Studies of a Novel Gene Aberrantly Expressed in RB-Deficient Embryos Shyng-Shiou F. Yuan,* Laura A. Cox,*,1 Gopal K. Dasika,* and Eva Y.-H. P. Lee*,2 *Department of Molecular Medicine/Institute of Biotechnology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78245 The tumor suppressor RB regulates diverse cellular processes such as G1/S transition, cell differentiation, and cell survival. Indeed, Rb-knockout mice exhibit phenotypes including ectopic mitosis, defective differentiation, and extensive apoptosis in the neurons. Using differential display, a novel gene, Rig-1, was isolated based on its elevated expression in the hindbrain and spinal cord of Rb-knockout embryos. The longest open reading frame of Rig-1 encoded a polypeptide that consists of a putative extracellular segment with five immunoglobulin-like domains and three fibronectin III-like domains, a putative transmembrane domain, and a distinct intracellular segment. The Rig-1 sequence was 40% identical to the recently identified roundabout protein. Consistent with the predicted transmembrane nature of the protein, Rig-1 protein was present in the membranous fraction. Antisera raised against the putative extracellular and intracellular segments of Rig-1 reacted with an ;210-kDa protein in mouse embryonic CNS. Rig-1 mRNA was transiently expressed in the embryonic hindbrain and spinal cord. Elevated levels of Rig-1 mRNA and protein were found in Rb2/2 embryos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prognostic Utility and Clinical Outcomes of MNX1-AS1 Expression in Cancers: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    The prognostic utility and clinical outcomes of MNX1-AS1 expression in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis Juan Li The rst aliated hospital, college of medicine, zhejiang university https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0121-7098 Wen Jin The rst aliated hospital, college of medicine, zhejiang university Zhengyu Zhang The rst aliated hospital, college of medicine, zhejiang university Jingjing Chu The rst aliated hospital, college of medicine, zhejiang university Hui Yang The rst aliated hospital, college of meicine, zhejiang university Chang Li the rst aliated hospital, college of medicine, zhejiang university Ruiyin Dong The rst aliated hospital, college of medicine, zhejiang university Cailian Zhao ( [email protected] ) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8337-0610 Primary research Keywords: Long non-coding RNA, MNX1-AS1, Cancer, Prognosis Posted Date: March 25th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-19089/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/9 Abstract Background: Recently, emerging studies have identied that MNX1-AS1 highly expressed among variety of cancers and related with worse prognosis of cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between MNX1-AS1 expression with clinical features and prognosis in different cancers. Methods: In this study, we searched the Web of Science, PubMed, CNKI, and Wanfang databases to nd relevant studies of MNX1-AS1. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% condence intervals (CIs) were applied to explore the prognostic and clinical signicance of MNX1-AS1. Results: A total of 9 literatures were included in this study, including 882 cancer patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Watsonjn2018.Pdf (1.780Mb)
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA Edmond, Oklahoma Department of Biology Investigating Differential Gene Expression in vivo of Cardiac Birth Defects in an Avian Model of Maternal Phenylketonuria A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BIOLOGY By Jamie N. Watson Edmond, OK June 5, 2018 J. Watson/Dr. Nikki Seagraves ii J. Watson/Dr. Nikki Seagraves Acknowledgements It is difficult to articulate the amount of gratitude I have for the support and encouragement I have received throughout my master’s thesis. Many people have added value and support to my life during this time. I am thankful for the education, experience, and friendships I have gained at the University of Central Oklahoma. First, I would like to thank Dr. Nikki Seagraves for her mentorship and friendship. I lucked out when I met her. I have enjoyed working on this project and I am very thankful for her support. I would like thank Thomas Crane for his support and patience throughout my master’s degree. I would like to thank Dr. Shannon Conley for her continued mentorship and support. I would like to thank Liz Bullen and Dr. Eric Howard for their training and help on this project. I would like to thank Kristy Meyer for her friendship and help throughout graduate school. I would like to thank my committee members Dr. Robert Brennan and Dr. Lilian Chooback for their advisement on this project. Also, I would like to thank the biology faculty and staff. I would like to thank the Seagraves lab members: Jailene Canales, Kayley Pate, Mckayla Muse, Grace Thetford, Kody Harvey, Jordan Guffey, and Kayle Patatanian for their hard work and support.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Lola Has the Properties of a Master Regulator of Axon-Target Interaction for Snb Motor Axons of Drosophila
    Developmental Biology 213, 301–313 (1999) Article ID dbio.1999.9399, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on lola Has the Properties of a Master Regulator of Axon–Target Interaction for SNb Motor Axons of Drosophila Knut Madden, Daniel Crowner, and Edward Giniger1 Division of Basic Sciences, Program in Developmental Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109 The proper pathfinding and target recognition of an axon requires the precisely choreographed expression of a multitude of guidance factors: instructive and permissive, positive and negative, and secreted and membrane bound. We show here that the transcription factor LOLA is required for pathfinding and targeting of the SNb motor nerve in Drosophila. We also show that lola is a dose-dependent regulator of SNb development: by varying the expression of one lola isoform we can progressively titrate the extent of interaction of SNb motor axons with their target muscles, from no interaction at all, through wild-type patterning, to apparent hyperinnervation. The phenotypes we observe from altered expression of LOLA suggest that this protein may help orchestrate the coordinated expression of the genes required for faithful SNb development. © 1999 Academic Press Key Words: axon guidance; synapse specification; alternative splicing; transcription factor; cell adhesion. INTRODUCTION In each embryonic abdominal hemisegment, the motor fascicle of SNb (also known as ISNb) comprises the axons of As an axon projects toward its synaptic targets in vivo, it eight identified motoneurons that project dorsally out of encounters a series of guidance “choice points,” at each of the ventral nerve cord, along a reproducible trajectory, to which the axon can either continue growing, turn onto a yield a precise pattern of innervation of seven bodywall different substratum, or stop and form a synapse.
    [Show full text]
  • Drosophila Mef2 Is Essential for Normal Mushroom Body and Wing Development
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/311845; this version posted April 30, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Drosophila mef2 is essential for normal mushroom body and wing development Jill R. Crittenden1, Efthimios M. C. Skoulakis2, Elliott. S. Goldstein3, and Ronald L. Davis4 1McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA 2Division of Neuroscience, Biomedical Sciences Research Centre "Alexander Fleming", Vari, 16672, Greece 3 School of Life Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA 4Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute Florida, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA Key words: MEF2, mushroom bodies, brain, muscle, wing, vein, Drosophila 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/311845; this version posted April 30, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. ABSTRACT MEF2 (myocyte enhancer factor 2) transcription factors are found in the brain and muscle of insects and vertebrates and are essential for the differentiation of multiple cell types. We show that in the fruitfly Drosophila, MEF2 is essential for normal development of wing veins, and for mushroom body formation in the brain. In embryos mutant for D-mef2, there was a striking reduction in the number of mushroom body neurons and their axon bundles were not detectable.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Information
    Supplemental information Dissection of the genomic structure of the miR-183/96/182 gene. Previously, we showed that the miR-183/96/182 cluster is an intergenic miRNA cluster, located in a ~60-kb interval between the genes encoding nuclear respiratory factor-1 (Nrf1) and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2H (Ube2h) on mouse chr6qA3.3 (1). To start to uncover the genomic structure of the miR- 183/96/182 gene, we first studied genomic features around miR-183/96/182 in the UCSC genome browser (http://genome.UCSC.edu/), and identified two CpG islands 3.4-6.5 kb 5’ of pre-miR-183, the most 5’ miRNA of the cluster (Fig. 1A; Fig. S1 and Seq. S1). A cDNA clone, AK044220, located at 3.2-4.6 kb 5’ to pre-miR-183, encompasses the second CpG island (Fig. 1A; Fig. S1). We hypothesized that this cDNA clone was derived from 5’ exon(s) of the primary transcript of the miR-183/96/182 gene, as CpG islands are often associated with promoters (2). Supporting this hypothesis, multiple expressed sequences detected by gene-trap clones, including clone D016D06 (3, 4), were co-localized with the cDNA clone AK044220 (Fig. 1A; Fig. S1). Clone D016D06, deposited by the German GeneTrap Consortium (GGTC) (http://tikus.gsf.de) (3, 4), was derived from insertion of a retroviral construct, rFlpROSAβgeo in 129S2 ES cells (Fig. 1A and C). The rFlpROSAβgeo construct carries a promoterless reporter gene, the β−geo cassette - an in-frame fusion of the β-galactosidase and neomycin resistance (Neor) gene (5), with a splicing acceptor (SA) immediately upstream, and a polyA signal downstream of the β−geo cassette (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Robo4 Is a Vascular-Specific Receptor That Inhibits
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com R Developmental Biology 261 (2003) 251–267 www.elsevier.com/locate/ydbio Robo4 is a vascular-specific receptor that inhibits endothelial migration Kye Won Park,a,b Clayton M. Morrison,a Lise K. Sorensen,a Christopher A. Jones,a,b Yi Rao,c Chi-Bin Chien,d Jane Y. Wu,e Lisa D. Urness,f and Dean Y. Lia,b,f,* a Program in Human Molecular Biology and Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA b Department of Oncological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA c Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA d Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA e Departments of Pediatrics and Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA f Division of Cardiology, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA Received for publication 4 December 2002, revised 17 April 2003, accepted 23 April 2003 Abstract Guidance and patterning of axons are orchestrated by cell-surface receptors and ligands that provide directional cues. Interactions between the Robo receptor and Slit ligand families of proteins initiate signaling cascades that repel axonal outgrowth. Although the vascular and nervous systems grow as parallel networks, the mechanisms by which the vascular endothelial cells are guided to their appropriate positions remain obscure. We have identified a putative Robo homologue, Robo4, based on its differential expression in mutant mice with defects in vascular sprouting.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]
  • Early Lineage Segregation of the Retinal Basal Glia in the Drosophila Eye Disc Chia‑Kang Tsao1,2, Yu Fen Huang1,2,3 & Y
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Early lineage segregation of the retinal basal glia in the Drosophila eye disc Chia‑Kang Tsao1,2, Yu Fen Huang1,2,3 & Y. Henry Sun1,2* The retinal basal glia (RBG) is a group of glia that migrates from the optic stalk into the third instar larval eye disc while the photoreceptor cells (PR) are diferentiating. The RBGs are grouped into three major classes based on molecular and morphological characteristics: surface glia (SG), wrapping glia (WG) and carpet glia (CG). The SGs migrate and divide. The WGs are postmitotic and wraps PR axons. The CGs have giant nucleus and extensive membrane extension that each covers half of the eye disc. In this study, we used lineage tracing methods to determine the lineage relationships among these glia subtypes and the temporal profle of the lineage decisions for RBG development. We found that the CG lineage segregated from the other RBG very early in the embryonic stage. It has been proposed that the SGs migrate under the CG membrane, which prevented SGs from contacting with the PR axons lying above the CG membrane. Upon passing the front of the CG membrane, which is slightly behind the morphogenetic furrow that marks the front of PR diferentiation, the migrating SG contact the nascent PR axon, which in turn release FGF to induce SGs’ diferentiation into WG. Interestingly, we found that SGs are equally distributed apical and basal to the CG membrane, so that the apical SGs are not prevented from contacting PR axons by CG membrane. Clonal analysis reveals that the apical and basal RBG are derived from distinct lineages determined before they enter the eye disc.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Temporal Specification of Neural Fates by Transcription Factor Codes François Guillemot
    REVIEW 3771 Development 134, 3771-3780 (2007) doi:10.1242/dev.006379 Spatial and temporal specification of neural fates by transcription factor codes François Guillemot The vertebrate central nervous system contains a great diversity Box 1. Neurons and glial cells of neurons and glial cells, which are generated in the embryonic neural tube at specific times and positions. Several classes of transcription factors have been shown to control various steps in the differentiation of progenitor cells in the neural tube and to determine the identity of the cells produced. Recent evidence indicates that combinations of transcription factors of the homeodomain and basic helix-loop-helix families establish molecular codes that determine both where and when the different kinds of neurons and glial cells are generated. Introduction Neuron Oligodendrocyte Astrocyte A multitude of neurons of different types, as well as oligodendrocytes and astrocytes (see Box 1), are generated as the vertebrate central The vertebrate central nervous system comprises three primary cell nervous system develops. These different neural cells are generated types, including neurons and two types of glial cells. Neurons are at defined times and positions by multipotent progenitors located in electrically excitable cells that process and transmit information via the walls of the embryonic neural tube. Progenitors located in the the release of neurotransmitters at synapses. Different subtypes of ventral neural tube at spinal cord level first produce motor neurons, neurons can be distinguished by the morphology of their cell body which innervate skeletal muscles and later produce oligodendrocytes and dendritic tree, the type of cells they connect with via their axon, the type of neurotransmitter used, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Aberrant Development of Pancreatic Beta Cells Derived from Human Ipscs with FOXA2 Deficiency Ahmed K
    Elsayed et al. Cell Death and Disease (2021) 12:103 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-021-03390-8 Cell Death & Disease ARTICLE Open Access Aberrant development of pancreatic beta cells derived from human iPSCs with FOXA2 deficiency Ahmed K. Elsayed1, Ihab Younis2, Gowher Ali1, Khalid Hussain3 and Essam M. Abdelalim 1,4 Abstract FOXA2 has been identified as an essential factor for pancreas development and emerging evidence supports an association between FOXA2 and diabetes. Although the role of FOXA2 during pancreatic development is well-studied in animal models, its role during human islet cell development remains unclear. Here, we generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from a patient with FOXA2 haploinsufficiency (FOXA2+/− iPSCs) followed by beta-cell differentiation to understand the role of FOXA2 during pancreatic beta-cell development. Our results showed that FOXA2 haploinsufficiency resulted in aberrant expression of genes essential for the differentiation and proper functioning of beta cells. At pancreatic progenitor (PP2) and endocrine progenitor (EPs) stages, transcriptome analysis showed downregulation in genes associated with pancreatic development and diabetes and upregulation in genes associated with nervous system development and WNT signaling pathway. Knockout of FOXA2 in control iPSCs (FOXA2−/− iPSCs) led to severe phenotypes in EPs and beta-cell stages. The expression of NGN3 and its downstream targets at EPs as well as INSUILIN and GLUCAGON at the beta-cell stage, were almost absent in the cells derived from FOXA2−/− iPSCs. These findings indicate that FOXA2 is crucial for human pancreatic endocrine development and its defect may lead to diabetes based on FOXA2 dosage. 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; Introduction TFs lead to neonatal diabetes, which can be associated During human development, early endodermal tissue with pancreatic hypoplasia/agenesis in some mutations4.
    [Show full text]