Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 124 / Friday, June 27, 1997 / Notices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 124 / Friday, June 27, 1997 / Notices 34780 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 124 / Friday, June 27, 1997 / Notices ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION other corrections to the docket list. At determine whether they pose a risk to AGENCY the time of publication of this notice, human health and the environment the new total number of Federal sufficient to warrant inclusion on the [FRL±5845±X] facilities listed on the docket is 2,104 National Priorities List (NPL); (2) to Federal Agency Hazardous Waste DATES: This list is current as of October compile and maintain the information Compliance Docket 1, 1996. submitted to EPA on such facilities FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: under the provisions listed in section AGENCY: Environmental Protection Toll-Free Telephone Line for the 120(c) of CERCLA; and (3) to provide a Agency. Docket, Telephone: (800) 548±1016, or mechanism to make the information ACTION: Notice of tenth update of the locally (703) 883±8577. Electronic available to the public. Federal Agency Hazardous Waste versions of the docket may be obtained The initial list of Federal facilities to Compliance Docket, pursuant to from Enviro$en$e/FFLEX (Federal be included on the docket was CERCLA section 120(c). Facilities Environmental Leadership published on February 12, 1988 (53 FR SUMMARY: Section 120(c) of the Exchange)@http://es.inel.gov/oeca/ [F.R.] 4280). Updates of the docket have Comprehensive Environmental fedfac/fflex.html been published on November 16, 1988 Response, Compensation, and Liability SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (54 FR 46364); December 15, 1989 (54 Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended by FR 51472); August 22, 1990 (55 FR Table of Contents the Superfund Amendments and 34492); September 27, 1991 (56 FR Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), 1. Introduction 49328); December 12, 1991 (56 FR requires the Environmental Protection 2. Revisions to the Previous Docket 3. Process for Compiling the Updated Docket 64898); July 17, 1992 (57 FR 31758); Agency (EPA) to establish a Federal 4. Facilities Not Included February 5, 1993 (58 FR 7298); and Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance 5. Information Contained on Docket Listing November 10, 1993 (58 FR 59790); and Docket. The docket is to contain certain 6. Facility Status Reporting April 11, 1995 (60 FR 18474). This information about Federal facilities that notice constitutes the tenth update of 1. Introduction manage hazardous waste or from which the docket. hazardous substances have been or may Section 120(c) of the Comprehensive Today's notice is divided into four be released. (As defined by CERCLA Environmental Response, sections: (1) Additions, (2) deletions, (3) section 101(22), a release is any spilling, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 corrections, and (4) a list of facilities leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, (CERCLA), 42 United States Code classified as no further remedial action emptying, discharging, injecting, (U.S.C.) 9620(c), as amended by the planned (NFRAP). The additions section escaping, leaching, dumping, or Superfund Amendments and lists newly identified facilities that have disposing into the environment.) Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), been reported to EPA since the last CERCLA requires that the docket be required the establishment of the update and that now are being included updated every six months, as new Federal Agency Hazardous Waste facilities are reported to EPA by Federal Compliance Docket. The docket on the docket. The deletions section agencies. The following list identifies contains information on Federal lists facilities that EPA is deleting from the Federal facilities to be included in facilities that is submitted by Federal the docket. The corrections section lists this tenth update of the docket and agencies to the U.S. Environmental changes in information about facilities includes facilities not previously listed Protection Agency (EPA) under sections already listed on the docket. The on the docket and reported to EPA since 3005, 3010, and 3016 of the Resource NFRAP list is the list of all docket the last update of the docket, 60 FR Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), facilities to which EPA has assigned a [F.R.] 18474, April 11,1995, (which was 42 U.S.C. 6925, 6930, and 6937 and status of no further remedial action current as of September 10, 1994). EPA under section 103 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. planned. policy specifies that, for each Federal 9603. Specifically, RCRA section 3005 The information submitted to EPA on facility that is included on the docket establishes a permitting system for each Federal facility is maintained in during an update, the responsible certain hazardous waste treatment, the docket repository located in the EPA Federal agency must complete a storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities; Regional office of the Region in which preliminary assessment (PA) and, if RCRA section 3010 requires waste the facility is located (see 53 FR 4280 warranted, a site inspection (SI) within generators and transporters and TSD [February 12, 1988] for a description of 18 months of publication of the notice. facilities to notify EPA of their the information required under those Such site evaluation activities will help hazardous waste activities; and RCRA provisions). Each repository contains determine whether the facility should section 3016 requires Federal agencies the documents submitted to EPA under be included on the National Priorities to submit biennially to EPA an the reporting provisions and List (NPL) and will provide EPA and the inventory of hazardous waste sites that correspondence relevant to the reporting public with valuable information about the Federal agencies own or operate. provisions for each facility. A complete the facility. In addition to the list of CERCLA section 103(a) requires that the national index of the information found additions to the docket, this notice National Response Center (NRC) be in the Regional docket repositories is includes a section that comprises notified of a release. CERCLA section maintained at EPA's Federal Facilities revisions (that is, corrections and 103(c) requires reporting to EPA the Enforcement Office in Washington, D.C. deletions) of the previous docket list existence of a facility at which and is available to the public. The index and a list of the facilities on the docket hazardous substances are or have been for each Region is available for public that have been evaluated and stored, treated, or disposed of and the review at each Regional repository. determined to be not appropriate for existence of known or suspected Contact the toll-free telephone line for listing on the NPL at this time (the no releases of hazardous substances at such the docket at (800) 548±1016, or locally further remedial action planned facilities. (703) 883±8577, for information on [NFRAP] list). This update contains 102 The docket serves three major locations of Regional repositories and additions and 69 deletions since the purposes: (1) To identify all Federal on making arrangements to obtain previous update, as well as numerous facilities that must be evaluated to specific documents. Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 124 / Friday, June 27, 1997 / Notices 34781 2. Revisions to the Previous Docket that had not been listed on the docket be deemed to have jurisdiction, custody, Following is a discussion of the but that have reported releases or or control over a facility. hazardous waste activities to EPA under revisions to the previous docket, 2.2 Deletions including additions, deletions, and another reporting provision. In the process of compiling the Today, 69 facilities are being deleted corrections. documents for the Regional repositories, from the docket for various reasons, 2.1 Additions EPA identified a number of facilities such as incorrect reporting of hazardous waste activity, change in ownership, Today, 102 facilities are being added that had previously submitted PA and exemption as an SQG under RCRA to the docket, primarily because of new reports, SI reports, Department of (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] information obtained by EPA (for Defense (DoD) Installation Restoration part 262.44). Facilities being deleted no example, recent reporting of a facility Program (IRP) reports, or reports under longer will be subject to the pursuant to RCRA sections 3005, 3010, another Federal agency environmental requirements of CERCLA section 120(d). or 3016 or CERCLA section 103). For all restoration program, but had not facilities being added to the docket, it is submitted a notification form under 2.3 Corrections CERCLA section 103. Section 120(c)(3) EPA's policy that the responsible of CERCLA requires that EPA include Changes necessary to correct the Federal agency must complete the on the docket information submitted previous docket were identified by both required preliminary assessment (PA) under section 103. In general, section EPA and Federal agencies. The changes and, if warranted, a site inspection (SI) 103 requires persons in charge of a needed varied from simple changes in within 18 months of the date of this vessel or facility to provide notice of addresses or spelling to corrections of publication. certain releases of hazardous the recorded name and ownership of a Of the 102 facilities being added to substances. The reports under Federal facility. In addition, some changes in the docket, 4 are facilities that have agency environmental restoration the names of facilities were made to reported to the NRC the release of a programs mentioned above contain establish consistency in the docket. reportable quantity (RQ) of a hazardous information similar to that provided Many new entries are simply substance. Under section 103(a) of pursuant to CERCLA section 103 and corrections of typographical errors. For CERCLA, a facility is required to report are considered equivalent forms of each facility for which a correction has to the NRC the release of a hazardous notification for the docket. Thus, EPA been entered, the original entry substance in a quantity that equals or believes that a facility that has provided (designated by an ``O''), as it appeared exceeds the established RQ.
Recommended publications
  • PARKS and RECREATION COMMISSION 2021 Prices for Cabins, Yurts and Vacation Houses (Prices Shown Without Tax)
    WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 2021 Prices for Cabins, Yurts and Vacation Houses (Prices shown without tax) Peak Season Shoulder Season Winter Apr 1 - May 14 May 15 - September 15 November 1 - March 31 & Sept 16 - Oct 31 Weekends & Weekends Weekends & Park & Facility Weeknights Holidays Weeknights & Holidays Weeknights Holidays BATTLE GROUND LAKE STATE PARK Cabins 79 79 69 69 55 55 BAY VIEW STATE PARK Cabins 1-4 79 79 69 69 55 55 Cabins 5-6 89 89 79 79 65 65 BELFAIR STATE PARK Cabins 79 79 59 69 55 55 BROOKS MEMORIAL STATE PARK Wall Tents 45 45 40 40 40 40 CAMA BEACH STATE PARK See end of table. CAMANO ISLAND STATE PARK See end of table. CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT STATE PARK Cabins 79 79 64 74 64 74 Yurts 79 79 64 74 64 74 Lighthouse Keeper 339 447 229 303 229 303 Ass't Lighthouse Kpr 241 318 164 217 164 217 COLUMBIA HILLS STATE PARK Rustic Cabins 50 50 50 50 50 50 CONCONULLY STATE PARK Cabin C1 79 79 64 69 60 60 Cabin C2-C5 69 69 54 59 54 54 DASH POINT STATE PARK Cabins 80 80 70 70 65 65 DECEPTION PASS STATE PARK C1 Ben Ure Island 99 99 79 79 69 69 WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 2020 Prices for Cabins, Yurts and Vacation Houses (Prices shown without tax) Peak Season Shoulder Season Winter Apr 1 - May 14 May 15 - September 15 November 1 - March 31 & Sept 16 - Oct 31 Weekends & Weekends Weekends & Park & Facility Weeknights Holidays Weeknights & Holidays Weeknights Holidays C2-C6 Campground 79 84 69 79 55 55 C7 Cornet Bay 100 100 100 100 100 100 C8 Cornet Bay 120 120 120 120 120 120 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK Cabins
    [Show full text]
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Coeur D'alene Comprehensive Plan (2007-2027)
    Coeur d’Alene Comprehensive Plan (2007-2027) Coeur d’Alene Comprehensive Plan City of Coeur d’Alene (2007-2027) Preface . Our Comprehensive Plan was developed as a guide for future development within Coeur d’Alene. We would like to thank members of our City Council, Planning Commission, volunteers, citizens, and staff for their contributions and help in developing this plan to make Coeur d’Alene a “City of Excellence.” Inside This Plan Coeur d’Alene: Vision Statement 4 Comprehensive Plan: Purpose and Intent 5 This is Coeur d'Alene Today: 2007 6 This is Coeur d'Alene Tomorrow: 2007-2027 7 Maps and Illustrations . State Context: 8 Goals and Objectives: Introduction 10 Area Context: 9 Goal #1 - Natural Environment 11 Goal #2 - Economic Environment Special Areas: 26+ 15 Goal #3 - Home Environment 17 Land Use: 39+ Goal #4 - Administrative Environment 21 Bikeways: 90 Special Areas 24-37 Parks & Open Space: 91 Land Use 38-71 Transportation Network: 92 Property Rights 72 Required Components 73 Implementation 74 Closing Statement 75 Appendices 76-85 This symbol will be followed by a website address where additional information can be located online. Definitions 86-89 Acknowledgements 93 Page 4 The City of Coeur d’Alene Coeur d’Alene: City of Excellence Vision Statement Our vision of Coeur d’Alene is of a beautiful, safe city that promotes a high quality of life and sound economy through excellence in government. Our Vision Statement is the premise on which the Comprehensive Plan was created. This declaration is the guiding statement for all city planning and decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 City of Gustavus Hazard Mitigation Plan City of Gustavus Hazard Mitigation Plan
    2019 CITY OF GUSTAVUS HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF GUSTAVUS HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING .......................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 2019 ALL-HAZARDS MITIGATION PLAN SYNOPSIS ................................................................ 1-1 2.0 PLANNING PROCESS ................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 OVERVIEW OF THE LHMP PLANNING PROCESS ................................................................... 2-1 2.2 OPPORTUNITIES FOR STAKEHOLDERS ................................................................................. 2-2 2.3 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ......................................................................................................... 2-3 2.4 REVIEW AND INCORPORATION OF EXISTING PLANS AND REPORTS ........................................ 2-4 2.5 INTEGRATING HMP PRECEPTS INTO EXISTING PLANNING MECHANISMS ................................ 2-5 2.6 CONTINUED PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ...................................................................................... 2-5 2.7 PLAN UPDATE AND MONITORING METHOD ........................................................................... 2-5 3.0 COMMUNITY PROFILE ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mill Valley Air Force Station East Is-Ridgecrest Boulevard, Mount Tarua.Lpais Mill Valley Vicinity .Marin County Califomia
    Mill Valley Air Force Station HABS No. CA-2615 East iS-Ridgecrest Boulevard, Mount Tarua.lpais Mill Valley Vicinity .Marin County califomia PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Buildings Survey National Park Service Western Region Department of the Interior San Francisco, California 94107 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDING SURVEY MILL VALLEY AIR FORCE STATION HABS No. CA-2615 Location: On the summit of Mount Tamalpais in Marin County, California Off of California State Highway 1 on East Ridg~~rest Boulevard. West of Mill Valley, California. North of San Francisco, California. Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: 10.535320.4197 420 10.535000.4197000 I 0.534540.4196680 10.534580.4197000 10.535000.4197260 Present Owner: National Park Service leases the land from the Marin Municipal Water District. Present Occupant: Mostly vacant except for the operations area which is occupied by the Federal Aviation Administration Facility Present Use: Federal Aviation Administration Facility Significance: Mill Valley Air Force Station (MVAFS) played a significant role in the United States Air Defense system during the period of the Cold War. The threat of Soviet nuclear and air force power warranted the construction of early warning radar stations throughout the country. With the opening of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the subsequent end to the Cold War, retrospective scholarship has labeled contributing defense systems, such as early warning radar, important features of United States military history. In fact, America's first major construction project as a result of Cold War hostilities was, apparently, the system of early warning radar stations of which Mill Valley Air Force Station was one.
    [Show full text]
  • Gustavus Airport PFAS Site Characterization GUSTAVUS, ALASKA
    SUBMITTED TO: Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities 2301 Peger Road Fairbanks, Alaska 99709 BY: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 2355 Hill Road Fairbanks, Alaska (907) 479-0600 www.shannonwilson.com WORK PLAN – REVISION 1 Gustavus Airport PFAS Site Characterization GUSTAVUS, ALASKA July 2019 Shannon & Wilson No: 102599-001 Gustavus Airport PFAS Site Characterization Work Plan – Revision 1 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR DOUBLE-SIDED PRINTING 102599-001 July 2019 Gustavus Airport PFAS Site Characterization Work Plan – Revision 1 Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities 2301 Peger Road Fairbanks, Alaska 99709 Attn: Ms. Samantha Loud RE: WORK PLAN – REVISION 1, GUSTAVUS AIRPORT PFAS SITE CHARACTERIZATION, GUSTAVUS, ALASKA The services we propose in this Work Plan will be conducted on behalf of the Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities (DOT&PF). Our scope of services was specified in our proposal dated February 1, 2019 and authorized on February 27, 2019 by DOT&PF under our Professional Services Agreement Number 25-19-1-013 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance (PFAS) Related Environmental & Engineering Services. Additional funding to implement this Work Plan will be requested following Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) approval. This Work Plan was prepared and reviewed by: Kristen Freiburger, Associate Senior Chemist Role: Project Manager Christopher Darrah, C.P.G., CPESC Vice President Role: Contract Manager 102599-001 July 2019 7/22/2019-000) Gustavus Work Plan i Gustavus Airport
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968)
    Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968) Prepared by Amy Ramirez . Jeanne Lambin . Robert L. Meinhardt . and Casey Woster 2016 The Cultural Resource Programs of the National Park Service have responsibilities that include stewardship of historic buildings, museum collections, archeological sites, cultural landscapes, oral and written histories, and ethnographic resources. The material is based upon work assisted by funding from the National Park Service. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior. Printed 2018 Cover: Atwood Center, Alaska Pacific University, Anchorage, 2017, NPS photograph MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY ARCHITECTURE IN ALASKA HISTORIC CONTEXT (1945 – 1968) Prepared for National Park Service, Alaska Regional Office Prepared by Amy Ramirez, B.A. Jeanne Lambin, M.S. Robert L. Meinhardt, M.A. and Casey Woster, M.A. July 2016 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Historic Context as a Planning & Evaluation Tool ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • April 02, 2014 Meeting Minutes
    Special Meeting of the Land Committee of the Spokane Park Board April 2, 2014, 3:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. City Hall Conference Room 5A, Fifth Floor 808 W Spokane Falls Boulevard Spokane, Washington Tony Madunich – Park Operations Division Manager Committee Members: Also present: Other City Staff: X Van Voorhis, Ken – Chairperson Park Board: Dan Buller X Kelley, Ross Randy Cameron Guest(s): X Meyer, Kristine Parks Staff: Kent Moline Potratz, Preston Leroy Eadie John Schram X Santorsola, Jim Garrett Jones X Selinger, Samuel Tony Madunich X Traver, Susan Al Vorderbrueggen X Wright, Chris Samuel Selinger attended telephonically. Randy Cameron arrived after the meeting convened. Summary The Committee recommended Park Board support the Tuscan Ridge nomination as a Spokane County Conservation Futures acquisition in consideration of a $100,000 provisional gift to Parks and Recreation to be used for maintenance and/or capital improvements. If Spokane County Commissioners approve the acquisition of the Tuscan Ridge property and the full amount of the provisional gift is realized, the Land Committee recommends that the Park Board accept ownership of the property. In no way does this motion commit the Park Board to acquire the property with any other funds other than Conservation Futures, or to commit to capital expenditures for improvements for parking and/or access from public roadways. The Committee recommended Park Board approval of Value Blanket Order with Western Equipment Distributors, Inc. for purchase of Toro park and golf course equipment and repair and replacement parts in the amount up to an estimated annual maximum expenditure of $65,000.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Alaska Itb Number 2515H029 Amendment Number One (1)
    STATE OF ALASKA ITB NUMBER 2515H029 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE (1) AMENDMENT ISSUING OFFICE: Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Statewide Contracting & Procurement P.O. Box 112500 (3132 Channel Drive, Room 145) Juneau, Alaska 99811-2500 THIS IS NOT AN ORDER DATE AMENDMENT ISSUED: February 9, 2015 ITB TITLE: De-icing Chemicals ITB OPENING DATE AND TIME: February 27, 2015 @ 2:00 PM Alaska Time The following changes are required: 1. Attachment A, DOT/PF Maintenance Stations identifying the address and contact information and is added to this ITB. This is a mandatory return Amendment. Your bid may be considered non-responsive and rejected if this signed amendment is not received [in addition to your bid] by the bid opening date and time. Becky Gattung Procurement Officer PHONE: (907) 465-8949 FAX: (907) 465-2024 NAME OF COMPANY DATE PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE ITB 2515H029 - De-icing Chemicals ATTACHMENT A DOT/PF Maintenance Stations SOUTHEAST REGION F.O.B. POINT Contact Name: Contact Phone: Cell: Juneau: 6860 Glacier Hwy., Juneau, AK 99801 Eric Wilkerson 465-1787 723-7028 Gustavus: Gustavus Airport, Gustavus, AK 99826 Brad Rider 697-2251 321-1514 Haines: 720 Main St., Haines, AK 99827 Matt Boron 766-2340 314-0334 Hoonah: 700 Airport Way, Hoonah, AK 99829 Ken Meserve 945-3426 723-2375 Ketchikan: 5148 N. Tongass Hwy. Ketchikan, AK 99901 Loren Starr 225-2513 617-7400 Klawock: 1/4 Mile Airport Rd., Klawock, AK 99921 Tim Lacour 755-2229 401-0240 Petersburg: 288 Mitkof Hwy., Petersburg, AK 99833 Mike Etcher 772-4624 518-9012 Sitka: 605 Airport Rd., Sitka, AK 99835 Steve Bell 966-2960 752-0033 Skagway: 2.5 Mile Klondike Hwy., Skagway, AK 99840 Missy Tyson 983-2323 612-0201 Wrangell: Airport Rd., Wrangell, AK 99929 William Bloom 874-3107 305-0450 Yakutat: Yakutat Airport, Yakutat, AK 99689 Robert Lekanof 784-3476 784-3717 1 of 6 ITB 2515H029 - De-icing Chemicals ATTACHMENT A DOT/PF Maintenance Stations NORTHERN REGION F.O.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Invitation to Bid Invitation Number 2519H037
    INVITATION TO BID INVITATION NUMBER 2519H037 RETURN THIS BID TO THE ISSUING OFFICE AT: Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Statewide Contracting & Procurement P.O. Box 112500 (3132 Channel Drive, Suite 350) Juneau, Alaska 99811-2500 THIS IS NOT AN ORDER DATE ITB ISSUED: January 24, 2019 ITB TITLE: De-icing Chemicals SEALED BIDS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE STATEWIDE CONTRACTING AND PROCUREMENT OFFICE AND MUST BE TIME AND DATE STAMPED BY THE PURCHASING SECTION PRIOR TO 2:00 PM (ALASKA TIME) ON FEBRUARY 14, 2019 AT WHICH TIME THEY WILL BE PUBLICLY OPENED. DELIVERY LOCATION: See the “Bid Schedule” DELIVERY DATE: See the “Bid Schedule” F.O.B. POINT: FINAL DESTINATION IMPORTANT NOTICE: If you received this solicitation from the State’s “Online Public Notice” web site, you must register with the Procurement Officer listed on this document to receive subsequent amendments. Failure to contact the Procurement Officer may result in the rejection of your offer. BIDDER'S NOTICE: By signature on this form, the bidder certifies that: (1) the bidder has a valid Alaska business license, or will obtain one prior to award of any contract resulting from this ITB. If the bidder possesses a valid Alaska business license, the license number must be written below or one of the following forms of evidence must be submitted with the bid: • a canceled check for the business license fee; • a copy of the business license application with a receipt date stamp from the State's business license office; • a receipt from the State’s business license office for
    [Show full text]