City of Yellowknife Strategic Waste Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

City of Yellowknife Strategic Waste Management Plan City of Yellowknife Strategic Waste Management Plan Final Report - April 2018 sonnevera international corp. Box 23 Bluffton, Alberta T0C 0M0 T: (403) 843-6563 [email protected] Strategic Waste Management Plan (SWMP) – Final Report The City of Yellowknife Executive Summary The 2018 Strategic Waste Management Plan builds on the waste reduction goals of the Corporate and Community Energy Plan and previous waste composition studies, composting projects and waste management plans to provide environmentally responsible waste management solutions that are cost- effective and address concerns and expectations of the public and stakeholders. The plan incorporates additional programs including: • Community elements such as government leadership, social marketing, branding, zero waste public events and improvements to public spaces recycling. • Enhancements to the backyard composting campaign, depot recycling system, curbside garbage system (user pay) and enhanced multi-family recycling. • Industrial, commercial and institutional initiatives such as waste diversion assistance, business recognition, food waste diversion, enhanced recycling and construction / demolition waste diversion. • Incentives and regulatory mechanisms including additional differential tipping fees and disposal bans. The plan will be implemented on a foundation of public consultation and program pilots to encourage high levels of support, engagement, and ultimately success. Program elements are outlined in the following table: i sonnevera international corp. Option Type Option Education / Government leadership Promotion Overall • Review and update internal procurement policy to encourage reduction, Approaches reuse and recycled content. • Develop a consistent comprehensive waste diversion program for all City and public buildings and operations. Community engagement • Develop a community engagement plan to promote waste reduction and diversion initiatives and leverage existing environmental networks. Community-based social marketing • Continue to build internal capacity in community-based social marketing and integrate these approaches into all program designs and implementation. • Expand marketing efforts for existing programming to improve participation and address specific behaviour issues. Branding • Continue using the City of Yellowknife waste branding to ensure a consistent program look and messaging throughout City waste reduction initiatives. • Initiate a cooperative design process between The City and the contractor for recycling infrastructure to improve consistency in bin design, colours and signage. Social Media • More actively promote the services offered though the ReCollect app. • Enhance The City’s website to provide more information related to The City’s waste reduction and waste management services, and incorporating more interactive features. Public spaces recycling • Pilot new and improved signage at existing public recycling bins, including assessment of participation and contamination levels, as well as an advertising campaign. • If the pilot is successful, all litter bins in public spaces should be replaced, over time, with multi-stream bins and supported by ongoing promotional activities. Zero waste public events • Promote the Yellowknife Sustainable Event Checklist to event organizers. • Require event organizers to prepare a waste management action plan including waste reduction and diversion elements as part of special events permits. • Continue to, and expand the program of, providing highly visible garbage and recycling containers to public events that are consistent (colours, signage) with other public space and municipal recycling initiatives. ii Strategic Waste Management Plan (SWMP) – Final Report The City of Yellowknife Option Type Option Residential Waste Backyard Composting Reduction / • Continue to promote, and expand, the backyard composting awareness Diversion campaign. Curbside Organics • Consider expanding the collection program to encompass MF and additional residences outside the current service area. • Deliver ongoing CBSM campaign to encourage Green Cart use and limit contamination. Expanded recycling sorting categories – Blue Bin Stations • Require residents to sort materials into additional plastics and paper categories to improve marketability of recyclables. User-pay/volume limitations • In the future offer a voluntary smaller waste container option that is associated with a lower fee. Enhanced multi-family diversion programming • Work with the recycling contractor to develop a targeted multi-family social marketing program. • As a launch to the campaign, provide in-suite recycling containers. Expanded residential organics collection – multi-family • Work with the waste collection/hauling contractor for the duration of the multi-family organics collection pilot at the Northview complexes. • Work with the waste collection/hauling contractor to develop a social marketing program specific to multi-family residents. • As a launch to the campaign, provide in-suite containers for recyclables and a kitchen catcher for organics (one for every unit in every building) • Due to the scale and potential capital costs associated with a multi-family organics program, a year-long pilot project is recommended. The pilot would allow The City to test organics collection with the multi-family sector and determine the desired program methodology – either by City service through a contractor, or by amending the Solid Waste Management Bylaw (4376). Industrial, Waste diversion assistance Commercial and • Provide technical and information assistance to businesses and institutions Institutional Waste that want to implement waste diversion programs. Reduction ICI recognition • Enhance the recognition program for businesses achieving high standards in waste diversion. ICI food waste diversion • Expand the pilot ICI food waste collection program, including promotion and education materials and training of staff at participating businesses, to identify specific opportunities and barriers to success. • Incorporating results from the pilot, introduce a community-wide promotion of ICI food waste collection service options. • Support ICI locations that want to implement on-site composting. iii sonnevera international corp. Enhanced ICI recycling collection • Work with the hauling contractor to design and implement alternate collection options for businesses in areas that present challenges to effective participation in diversion programs. • Consider providing municipal buildings with recycling services as an add-on to the multi-family recycling program Expanded C&D diversion opportunities • Expand the wood recycling program to include all clean (uncoated) wood waste. • Separate clean drywall loads for diversion in the composting program. • Assess the potential benefits of adding more aggregate diversion opportunities at the SWF. • Encourage all scalehouse operators/staff to encourage contractors to drop- off reusable items at the ReStore whenever possible. • Collaborate with the ReStore to encourage more donations, visitors and ultimately move material more quickly. Infrastructure and Weigh Scale Operating • Purchase a second scale so all vehicles can be weighed in and out at the Enhancements SWF. Infrastructure and • If purchasing a second scale is cost prohibitive, over a period of one month, Operating all self-haul loads should be weighed in and out and an average determined Enhancements for use in the future. • OR • Implement a scale traffic control system, where vehicles drive over the scale both inbound and outbound. • Complete a landfill traffic monitoring study to review the options for better reporting of load weights. Composting Site • Staff should develop a template form that can be used to document routine inspections of the composting facility. • Staff should correct the reference to pathogen time and temperature requirements on page 24 of the Operations and Maintenance Manual to make it consistent with the information provided on page 30. • Staff should take advantage of the ability of spreadsheets (or other software) to electronically track process data and develop trend charts. • A more complete discussion of the protocols for leachate sampling should be included in the Operations and Maintenance Manual. • Increasing the amount of coarse amendment in the composting piles • Equipe front-end loader used at the site with an over-sized bucket • Repair/complete electric safety fence to prevent potential safety issues resulting from human-bear interactions. • Install knotted ropes or rope nets/ladders around edges of leachate pond. Salvage Area • Develop a separate area where material can be donated and picked up without entering heavy traffic areas of the SWF or go across the scale. iv Strategic Waste Management Plan (SWMP) – Final Report The City of Yellowknife Option Type Option Regulatory Options Differential tipping fees • Create a financial incentive for diverting recyclable and compostable materials through a system of differential tipping fees at the Solid Waste Facility. Disposal bans • Consider implementation of disposal bans for waste materials that have an existing collection and processing infrastructure in place. Residential mandatory recycling / source separation • If promotion and education and financial incentives such as pay-as-you- throw garbage collection do not provide the desired level of residential program performance, implement curbside collection bans for all organics and recyclables that are part of both
Recommended publications
  • Emission Factor Documentationfor AP42 Section 2.4 Municipal Solid
    Background Information Document for Updating AP42 Section 2.4 for Estimating Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills EPA/600/R-08-116 September 2008 Background Information Document for Updating AP42 Section 2.4 for Estimating Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Prepared by Eastern Research Group, Inc. 1600 Perimeter Park Dr. Morrisville, NC 27560 Contract Number: EP-C-07-015 Work Assignment Number: 0-4 EPA Project Officer Susan Thorneloe Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division National Risk Management Research Laboratory Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 Notice The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research and Development performed and managed the research described in this report. It has been subjected to the Agency‘s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Any opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not, necessarily, reflect the official positions and policies of the EPA. Any mention of products or trade names does not constitute recommendation for use by the EPA. ii Abstract This document was prepared for U.S. EPA’s Office of Research and Development in support of EPA’s Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS). The objective is to summarize available data used to update emissions factors for quantifying landfill gas emissions and combustion by-products using more up-to-date and representative data for U.S. municipal landfills. This document provides background information used in developing a draft of the AP-42 section 2.4 which provides guidance for developing estimates of landfill gas emissions for national, regional, and state emission inventories.
    [Show full text]
  • Pasco Sanitary Landfill Update
    Pasco Sanitary Landfill: Managing a Subsurface Fire at a MTCA Cleanup Site Washington State LEPC-Tribal Conference Chelan, WA, May 16, 2017 Chuck Gruenenfelder & Jeremy Schmidt, site managers Toxics Cleanup Program, Eastern Region How the public sometimes perceives the pace of environmental cleanup at complex sites Department of Ecology Regional and Field Offices Pasco Landfill site Topics for today • Site history • Cleanup activities: Past & present • Landfill fire basics • Balefill area fire: Initial actions • Final fire extinguishment • Lessons learned • Ongoing activities Pasco Landfill site history Site location Dietrich Road by intersections of Kahlotus Road and U.S. Highway 12 Columbia River Site map Municipal Aerial view solid waste (MSW) landfill E C/D Bale SVE ops A fill B area Basin Disposal SVE = Soil vapor extraction What’s in the neighborhood? Columbia & Snake rivers Nearby transfer station Agriculture Local residents Site history & features • Municipal waste landfill (1958 – 1993) – Burn trenches (1958–1971) – Balefill and Inert Waste Area (1976–1993) – Septic tank wastes, sewage sludge (1976–1989) • Industrial wastes (1972 – 1975) – Zone A: ~35,000 drums mixed industrial waste – Zone B: Herbicide wastes (~5,000 drums) – Zone C/D: Various sludges/resins (>3,000,000 gallons) – Zone E: Chlor-alkali wastes (~11,000 tons) • Groundwater plume (1985 – present) Cleanup actions & landfill operations Zone A – 1973 Zone B drum removal – 2002 MSW landfill flare Soil vapor extraction system 2014–2017: Focused Pasco Sanitary feasibility
    [Show full text]
  • Kittitas County Solid Waste Management Plan
    Final Draft Kittitas County 2010 Solid Waste and Moderate Risk Waste Management Plan Update Kittitas County Solid Waste Department 925 Industrial Way Ellensburg, Washington 98926 (509) 962-7542 2010 SW and MRW Management Plan Update Final Draft Kittitas County 2010 Solid Waste and Moderate Risk Waste Management Plan Update Prepared for: Kittitas County Solid Waste Department 925 Industrial Way Ellensburg, Washington 98926 (509) 962-7542 Prepared by: SCS ENGINEERS 3900 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 100 Long Beach, CA 90806 (562) 426-9544 With: Cascadia Consulting Group HDR Engineering, Inc. 1109 First Avenue, Suite 400 801 South Grand Ave., Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98101 Los Angeles, CA 90017 August 2011 SCS File No. 01209077.01 Offices Nationwide www.scsengineers.com 2010 SW and MRW Management Plan Update Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................................................................................1 ES.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................1 ES.1.1 Plan Requirements.........................................................................................................2 ES.1.2 Developing the Plan.....................................................................................................2 ES.1.3 Organization of the Plan Update..............................................................................3 ES.2 Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management Has Been an Invaluable Partner of the Oakland Unified School District's Waste Reduction and Recycling Efforts
    APPENDI C E S Waste Management has been an invaluable partner of the Oakland Unified School District’s waste reduction and recycling efforts…and has enthusiastically brought its zero-waste expertise, closed-loop solutions and commitment. − Roland Broach, Director of Custodial Services Oakland Unified School District OAK_Recycling_Tabs_12-20-2012.indd 41 12/20/2012 4:31:20 PM My husband and I live in Oakland with our seven kids. We moved here so I could be close to work. I love that my kids learn about recycling in school, recycle at home and know that my company makes it happen! − Rosemary Smith, WMAC Employee 10 Years OAK_Recycling_Tabs_12-20-2012.indd 42 12/20/2012 4:31:24 PM Zero Waste Services Value-Added Services 7. APPENDICES Proposers may provide any additional information that they believe to be applicable to this proposal and include such information as an Appendix. Proposers should include information related to alterna- tives or exceptions in the Appendix. On the following pages, please find appendices A through G of WMAC’s RR Collection Services proposal. We’ve provided these sections in the following order: Appendix A. Alternatives and Exceptions Appendix B. Economic Impact Report Appendix C. Sustainability Report Appendix D. Resumes Appendix E. Litigation History Appendix F. Labor Agreements Appendix G. Sample Reports Waste Management of Alameda County 255 Value-Added Services The City of Oakland 256 Locally Union Printed on 100% PCW Recycled Paper Zero Waste Services Appendix A. Alternatives and Exceptions This page contains Waste Management company confidential and proprietary methods, work product, and information and therefore is not subject to disclosure.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management Handbook
    WASTE MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK 10th Edition - October 2017 Edited by the Environment Office THE BRITISH ANTARCTIC SURVEY WASTE MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 11 1.1 Purpose of the BAS Waste Management Handbook ............................................ 11 1.2 BAS Waste Management Policy .......................................................................... 11 1.3 How to use this handbook .................................................................................... 11 2 LEGISLATION ...................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Antarctic Environmental Legislation ................................................................... 14 2.1.1 Annex III: Waste Disposal and Waste Management ................................ 14 2.1.2 Annex IV: Prevention of Marine Pollution ............................................... 14 2.1.3 MARPOL 73/78 ......................................................................................... 14 2.1.4 Polar Code ................................................................................................ 15 2.2 UK Environmental Legislation............................................................................. 15 2.2.1 The Waste (England and Wales) (Amendment) Regulations, 2014 ......... 15 2.2.2 The Duty of Care Regulations, 1991 ......................................................... 16 2.2.3 The Hazardous Waste Regulations,
    [Show full text]
  • Household Recycling and Trash MADE SIMPLE
    RECYCLE CLEAN, DRY PLASTIC BAGS LARGE ITEM COLLECTION Household Recycling and Trash & WRAP at a FACILITY or STORE MADE SIMPLE PLASTIC ITEMS Plastic bags and plastic wrap are not accepted in the curbside recycling program. Return these items to a local Large plastic items, such as children’s toys and grocery store or County Recycling Center for recycling. RECYC playsets, can be recycled. The items should be LIN G placed next to your recycling container(s) with other Facility & Curbside Collection HOLIDAY SCHEDULE & paper, plastic, metal, and glass recyclables on your collection day. P L 2021 Holidays All Facilities Curbside Collection A S Juneteenth FRI, JUNE 18 Closed Normal collections will occur T I C Monday collections occur Tuesday METAL ITEMS & APPLIANCES I Independence Day OBSERVED MON, JULY 5 Closed T Tuesday collections occur Wednesday E Visit www.aacounty.org/services-and-programs/schedule- M Monday collections occur Tuesday S Labor Day MON, SEP 6 Closed bulk-metal-item-pickup to submit a request online to schedule Tuesday collections occur Wednesday collection of large metal items such as swing sets, Veterans Day THUR, NOV 11 Closed Normal collections will occur refrigerators, and lawn mowers. Thanksgiving Day THUR, NOV 25 Closed Thursday collections occur Friday YAR Thanksgiving Friday FRI, NOV 26 Closed Friday collections occur Saturday D W A • Items must be put at the curb before 6:00 AM S Christmas OBSERVED FRI, DEC 24 Closed Normal collections will occur T on the scheduled collection day. E Christmas Day SAT, DEC 25 Closed No collection changes • Only those items specifically requested for New Year’s OBSERVED FRI, DEC 31 Closed Normal collections will occur collection will be picked up.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities at the Paducah U.S
    PAD- WD-OOlllRl Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities at the Paducah U.S. Department of Energy Site This document is approved for public release per revi ew by: 3-1\ - ~~ 13 LATA Kentucky Classification Support Date PAD-WD-0011/R1 Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities at the Paducah U.S. Department of Energy Site Date Issued—March 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Environmental Management Prepared by LATA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OF KENTUCKY, LLC managing the Environmental Remediation Activities at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant under contract DE-AC30-10CC40020 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK APPROVALS Waste Acceptance C:rite:ria fo:r the T:reatment, Sto:rage, and Disposal Facilities at the Padu.cah U.S. Depa:rtment of Ene:rgy Site PAD-WD-OOll/Rl March 2013 ( Zeiss Date ::;:dll2----DickieI&(;hn Date Waste Operations Manager Date Effective Date: ___-----==3==------_[ \_-_1_3 ________ _ Review Date: ____~3'__-__'_I_=____1 -------.!.-\ ~-\--_------- Nuclear Safety Documentation Number: PSW-PH-SITE-0490 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CONTENTS FIGURES AND TABLES .......................................................................................................................... vii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................................................................... ix DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • County Operates State-Of-The-Art Balefill
    ’6 2 W USE of balers has enabled county to establish an efficient landfill in an area that would otherwise be unsuitable. County Operates State-oflthe-Art Balefill RON WEATHERMAN nessee, Georgia, Florida, and North per acre. “We needed to maximize the use Director of Solid Waste, Carolina . of the lined landfill space,” Mashburn Iredell County, After visiting the various baling opera- said. And baling would allow the county Statesville, North Carolina tions and learning about their successes, to place the most waste per acre as com- a balefill operation became a viable op- pared with other compaction methods. HE Iredell County Solid Waste Facil- tion for the Iredell County Solid Waste Municipal Engineering calculated the ex- T ity in Statesville, North Carolina Facility. The amount of airspace savings pected life of Iredell County’s balefill to (near Charlotte), started as a conventional achieved by baling solid waste was the be between 30 and 40 years. landfill operation in 1979. But the facil- convincing factor for us. The few minor Go-Ahead Given ity began to run out of space and needed problems associated with baling, such as to move to a new site. At the same time, baler downtime, were overshadowed by After Iredell County gave the consul- costly Subtitle D mandates required the the overall benefits of a balefill. Accord- tant the go-ahead to design and oversee county to make more efficient use of the ing to Municipal Engineering, baling the the construction of the new solid waste sparsely available landfill space. solid waste before putting it into the balefill facility, the next step was to find The best choice for a new site was 169 ground achieves, on average, a 45 percent a high-quality, cost-effective solid waste acres of land nestled between Statesville higher compaction rate than conventional baler or, as it turned out, balers.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Transfer Stations: a Manual for Decision-Making Acknowledgments
    Waste Transfer Stations: A Manual for Decision-Making Acknowledgments he Office of Solid Waste (OSW) would like to acknowledge and thank the members of the Solid Waste Association of North America Focus Group and the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council Waste Transfer Station Working Group for reviewing and providing comments on this draft document. We would also like to thank Keith Gordon of Weaver Boos & Gordon, Inc., for providing a technical Treview and donating several of the photographs included in this document. Acknowledgements i Contents Acknowledgments. i Introduction . 1 What Are Waste Transfer Stations?. 1 Why Are Waste Transfer Stations Needed?. 2 Why Use Waste Transfer Stations? . 3 Is a Transfer Station Right for Your Community? . 4 Planning and Siting a Transfer Station. 7 Types of Waste Accepted . 7 Unacceptable Wastes . 7 Public Versus Commercial Use . 8 Determining Transfer Station Size and Capacity . 8 Number and Sizing of Transfer Stations . 10 Future Expansion . 11 Site Selection . 11 Environmental Justice Considerations . 11 The Siting Process and Public Involvement . 11 Siting Criteria. 14 Exclusionary Siting Criteria . 14 Technical Siting Criteria. 15 Developing Community-Specific Criteria . 17 Applying the Committee’s Criteria . 18 Host Community Agreements. 18 Transfer Station Design and Operation . 21 Transfer Station Design . 21 How Will the Transfer Station Be Used? . 21 Site Design Plan . 21 Main Transfer Area Design. 22 Types of Vehicles That Use a Transfer Station . 23 Transfer Technology . 25 Transfer Station Operations. 27 Operations and Maintenance Plans. 27 Facility Operating Hours . 32 Interacting With the Public . 33 Waste Screening . 33 Emergency Situations . 34 Recordkeeping. 35 Environmental Issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Narrative for Solid Waste and Recycling System Requirements Alameda County, CA
    Design Narrative for Solid Waste and Recycling System Requirements Alameda County, CA | General Services Agency Contact: Karen Cook, 510-208-9754, [email protected] Design Narrative for Solid Waste & Recycling System Requirements For Use on County Government Capital Projects Only Private Owner Projects in Unincorporated Alameda County: Visit https://www.acpwa.org/ Purpose and Scope This document specifies the design requirements for solid waste and recycling systems for facilities built for use by Alameda County, including build-to-suit. It is provided to assist project managers and project design teams with ensuring County operational services needs are met, including: Capacity considerations for expected waste & recyclables generation, Indoor and outdoor space and equipment needs, Path of travel requirements for waste and recyclables from the building to the outdoor enclosure, and Design and access requirements for the outdoor trash enclosure. The waste and recycling system shall be designed to support the minimum diversion of 75% of all the waste generated in the facility per Alameda County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 2008-213, and the 1990 County Charter Amendment known as Measure D, as well as meet the requirements of the Alameda County Mandatory Recycling Ordinance (2012). These requirements do not override any applicable regulations, such as municipal code, and the Design Builder must ensure compliance with such applicable regulations. The waste system should be designed into the facility from the earliest stages, as bin needs inside and the waste enclosure outside may influence the building’s design, layout and budget. This document was developed by the GSA-Sustainability program, with extensive input from affected internal and external stakeholders responsible for managing operations related to waste and recycling.
    [Show full text]
  • Litter Cleanup Guide
    Litter Cleanup Guide Table of Contents 2-5 Overview of Planning Steps 6-7 Key Contacts 8-10 Planning Worksheet: Organizing the Publicity 11 Sample Press Release 12 Tips for Working with the Media 13-17 Planning Worksheet: Organizing the Volunteers 18 Planning Worksheet: Cleanup Supplies 19 Planning Worksheet: Safety Tips for Cleanup Volunteers 1 Select a Coordinator The coordinator oversees everyone who is helping to organize the cleanup and is the primary contact on the cleanup day. If you are the coordinator, find people to assist you in organizing the event or form committees that will focus on specific aspects of the cleanup. If the cleanup encompasses a really large area such as multiple neighborhoods, it may help to divide the area into zones and assign a coordinator for each zone. Select a Field Coordinator Although there is an overall coordinator for the cleanup, it is helpful to have a field coordinator, someone who knows the physical environment and can assist the cleanup crews and city personnel the day of the event. The field coordinator coordinates surveying the cleanup site in advance to determine the number of volunteers needed, the locations to send volunteers, and the type, amount and location of trash. This information is sent to the overall coordinator for use by the other committees. Coordinate Planning Participants It is important that no one person has too much to do. Each person should feel like he/she is making a contribution without feeling overwhelmed. Example assignments include: Publicity Volunteers Cleanup Supplies Logistics (trash pickup, location, date, etc.) Celebration Follow-up Set a Date for the Cleanup Set a date and time for the cleanup, preferably two to three months in advance.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Health Workers in the Management of Sharps Waste
    Training Health Workers in the Management of Sharps Waste Guide for Training of Waste Handlers Contents 1. Training Overview................................................................................................................43 2. Sharps Waste Overview........................................................................................................45 3. Health Worker Safety ...........................................................................................................48 4. Segregation of Waste ............................................................................................................51 5. Handling, Storage, and Transport of Safety Boxes...............................................................56 6. Overview of Sharps Treatment, Destruction, and Disposal..................................................58 7. Treatment of Sharps: Liquid Disinfection ............................................................................60 8. Treatment of Sharps: Autoclave/Shredding..........................................................................62 9. Treatment of Sharps: Encapsulation .....................................................................................66 10. Treatment and Destruction of Sharps: Incineration..............................................................68 11. Disposal of Removed Needles: Protected Sharps Pit ...........................................................73 12. Disposal of Removed Needles: Protected Sharps Barrel......................................................78
    [Show full text]