City of Yellowknife Strategic Waste Management Plan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Emission Factor Documentationfor AP42 Section 2.4 Municipal Solid
Background Information Document for Updating AP42 Section 2.4 for Estimating Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills EPA/600/R-08-116 September 2008 Background Information Document for Updating AP42 Section 2.4 for Estimating Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Prepared by Eastern Research Group, Inc. 1600 Perimeter Park Dr. Morrisville, NC 27560 Contract Number: EP-C-07-015 Work Assignment Number: 0-4 EPA Project Officer Susan Thorneloe Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division National Risk Management Research Laboratory Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 Notice The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research and Development performed and managed the research described in this report. It has been subjected to the Agency‘s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Any opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not, necessarily, reflect the official positions and policies of the EPA. Any mention of products or trade names does not constitute recommendation for use by the EPA. ii Abstract This document was prepared for U.S. EPA’s Office of Research and Development in support of EPA’s Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS). The objective is to summarize available data used to update emissions factors for quantifying landfill gas emissions and combustion by-products using more up-to-date and representative data for U.S. municipal landfills. This document provides background information used in developing a draft of the AP-42 section 2.4 which provides guidance for developing estimates of landfill gas emissions for national, regional, and state emission inventories. -
Pasco Sanitary Landfill Update
Pasco Sanitary Landfill: Managing a Subsurface Fire at a MTCA Cleanup Site Washington State LEPC-Tribal Conference Chelan, WA, May 16, 2017 Chuck Gruenenfelder & Jeremy Schmidt, site managers Toxics Cleanup Program, Eastern Region How the public sometimes perceives the pace of environmental cleanup at complex sites Department of Ecology Regional and Field Offices Pasco Landfill site Topics for today • Site history • Cleanup activities: Past & present • Landfill fire basics • Balefill area fire: Initial actions • Final fire extinguishment • Lessons learned • Ongoing activities Pasco Landfill site history Site location Dietrich Road by intersections of Kahlotus Road and U.S. Highway 12 Columbia River Site map Municipal Aerial view solid waste (MSW) landfill E C/D Bale SVE ops A fill B area Basin Disposal SVE = Soil vapor extraction What’s in the neighborhood? Columbia & Snake rivers Nearby transfer station Agriculture Local residents Site history & features • Municipal waste landfill (1958 – 1993) – Burn trenches (1958–1971) – Balefill and Inert Waste Area (1976–1993) – Septic tank wastes, sewage sludge (1976–1989) • Industrial wastes (1972 – 1975) – Zone A: ~35,000 drums mixed industrial waste – Zone B: Herbicide wastes (~5,000 drums) – Zone C/D: Various sludges/resins (>3,000,000 gallons) – Zone E: Chlor-alkali wastes (~11,000 tons) • Groundwater plume (1985 – present) Cleanup actions & landfill operations Zone A – 1973 Zone B drum removal – 2002 MSW landfill flare Soil vapor extraction system 2014–2017: Focused Pasco Sanitary feasibility -
Kittitas County Solid Waste Management Plan
Final Draft Kittitas County 2010 Solid Waste and Moderate Risk Waste Management Plan Update Kittitas County Solid Waste Department 925 Industrial Way Ellensburg, Washington 98926 (509) 962-7542 2010 SW and MRW Management Plan Update Final Draft Kittitas County 2010 Solid Waste and Moderate Risk Waste Management Plan Update Prepared for: Kittitas County Solid Waste Department 925 Industrial Way Ellensburg, Washington 98926 (509) 962-7542 Prepared by: SCS ENGINEERS 3900 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 100 Long Beach, CA 90806 (562) 426-9544 With: Cascadia Consulting Group HDR Engineering, Inc. 1109 First Avenue, Suite 400 801 South Grand Ave., Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98101 Los Angeles, CA 90017 August 2011 SCS File No. 01209077.01 Offices Nationwide www.scsengineers.com 2010 SW and MRW Management Plan Update Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................................................................................1 ES.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................1 ES.1.1 Plan Requirements.........................................................................................................2 ES.1.2 Developing the Plan.....................................................................................................2 ES.1.3 Organization of the Plan Update..............................................................................3 ES.2 Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................................3 -
Waste Management Has Been an Invaluable Partner of the Oakland Unified School District's Waste Reduction and Recycling Efforts
APPENDI C E S Waste Management has been an invaluable partner of the Oakland Unified School District’s waste reduction and recycling efforts…and has enthusiastically brought its zero-waste expertise, closed-loop solutions and commitment. − Roland Broach, Director of Custodial Services Oakland Unified School District OAK_Recycling_Tabs_12-20-2012.indd 41 12/20/2012 4:31:20 PM My husband and I live in Oakland with our seven kids. We moved here so I could be close to work. I love that my kids learn about recycling in school, recycle at home and know that my company makes it happen! − Rosemary Smith, WMAC Employee 10 Years OAK_Recycling_Tabs_12-20-2012.indd 42 12/20/2012 4:31:24 PM Zero Waste Services Value-Added Services 7. APPENDICES Proposers may provide any additional information that they believe to be applicable to this proposal and include such information as an Appendix. Proposers should include information related to alterna- tives or exceptions in the Appendix. On the following pages, please find appendices A through G of WMAC’s RR Collection Services proposal. We’ve provided these sections in the following order: Appendix A. Alternatives and Exceptions Appendix B. Economic Impact Report Appendix C. Sustainability Report Appendix D. Resumes Appendix E. Litigation History Appendix F. Labor Agreements Appendix G. Sample Reports Waste Management of Alameda County 255 Value-Added Services The City of Oakland 256 Locally Union Printed on 100% PCW Recycled Paper Zero Waste Services Appendix A. Alternatives and Exceptions This page contains Waste Management company confidential and proprietary methods, work product, and information and therefore is not subject to disclosure. -
Waste Management Handbook
WASTE MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK 10th Edition - October 2017 Edited by the Environment Office THE BRITISH ANTARCTIC SURVEY WASTE MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 11 1.1 Purpose of the BAS Waste Management Handbook ............................................ 11 1.2 BAS Waste Management Policy .......................................................................... 11 1.3 How to use this handbook .................................................................................... 11 2 LEGISLATION ...................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Antarctic Environmental Legislation ................................................................... 14 2.1.1 Annex III: Waste Disposal and Waste Management ................................ 14 2.1.2 Annex IV: Prevention of Marine Pollution ............................................... 14 2.1.3 MARPOL 73/78 ......................................................................................... 14 2.1.4 Polar Code ................................................................................................ 15 2.2 UK Environmental Legislation............................................................................. 15 2.2.1 The Waste (England and Wales) (Amendment) Regulations, 2014 ......... 15 2.2.2 The Duty of Care Regulations, 1991 ......................................................... 16 2.2.3 The Hazardous Waste Regulations, -
Household Recycling and Trash MADE SIMPLE
RECYCLE CLEAN, DRY PLASTIC BAGS LARGE ITEM COLLECTION Household Recycling and Trash & WRAP at a FACILITY or STORE MADE SIMPLE PLASTIC ITEMS Plastic bags and plastic wrap are not accepted in the curbside recycling program. Return these items to a local Large plastic items, such as children’s toys and grocery store or County Recycling Center for recycling. RECYC playsets, can be recycled. The items should be LIN G placed next to your recycling container(s) with other Facility & Curbside Collection HOLIDAY SCHEDULE & paper, plastic, metal, and glass recyclables on your collection day. P L 2021 Holidays All Facilities Curbside Collection A S Juneteenth FRI, JUNE 18 Closed Normal collections will occur T I C Monday collections occur Tuesday METAL ITEMS & APPLIANCES I Independence Day OBSERVED MON, JULY 5 Closed T Tuesday collections occur Wednesday E Visit www.aacounty.org/services-and-programs/schedule- M Monday collections occur Tuesday S Labor Day MON, SEP 6 Closed bulk-metal-item-pickup to submit a request online to schedule Tuesday collections occur Wednesday collection of large metal items such as swing sets, Veterans Day THUR, NOV 11 Closed Normal collections will occur refrigerators, and lawn mowers. Thanksgiving Day THUR, NOV 25 Closed Thursday collections occur Friday YAR Thanksgiving Friday FRI, NOV 26 Closed Friday collections occur Saturday D W A • Items must be put at the curb before 6:00 AM S Christmas OBSERVED FRI, DEC 24 Closed Normal collections will occur T on the scheduled collection day. E Christmas Day SAT, DEC 25 Closed No collection changes • Only those items specifically requested for New Year’s OBSERVED FRI, DEC 31 Closed Normal collections will occur collection will be picked up. -
Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities at the Paducah U.S
PAD- WD-OOlllRl Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities at the Paducah U.S. Department of Energy Site This document is approved for public release per revi ew by: 3-1\ - ~~ 13 LATA Kentucky Classification Support Date PAD-WD-0011/R1 Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities at the Paducah U.S. Department of Energy Site Date Issued—March 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Environmental Management Prepared by LATA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OF KENTUCKY, LLC managing the Environmental Remediation Activities at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant under contract DE-AC30-10CC40020 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK APPROVALS Waste Acceptance C:rite:ria fo:r the T:reatment, Sto:rage, and Disposal Facilities at the Padu.cah U.S. Depa:rtment of Ene:rgy Site PAD-WD-OOll/Rl March 2013 ( Zeiss Date ::;:dll2----DickieI&(;hn Date Waste Operations Manager Date Effective Date: ___-----==3==------_[ \_-_1_3 ________ _ Review Date: ____~3'__-__'_I_=____1 -------.!.-\ ~-\--_------- Nuclear Safety Documentation Number: PSW-PH-SITE-0490 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CONTENTS FIGURES AND TABLES .......................................................................................................................... vii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................................................................... ix DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................................................ -
County Operates State-Of-The-Art Balefill
’6 2 W USE of balers has enabled county to establish an efficient landfill in an area that would otherwise be unsuitable. County Operates State-oflthe-Art Balefill RON WEATHERMAN nessee, Georgia, Florida, and North per acre. “We needed to maximize the use Director of Solid Waste, Carolina . of the lined landfill space,” Mashburn Iredell County, After visiting the various baling opera- said. And baling would allow the county Statesville, North Carolina tions and learning about their successes, to place the most waste per acre as com- a balefill operation became a viable op- pared with other compaction methods. HE Iredell County Solid Waste Facil- tion for the Iredell County Solid Waste Municipal Engineering calculated the ex- T ity in Statesville, North Carolina Facility. The amount of airspace savings pected life of Iredell County’s balefill to (near Charlotte), started as a conventional achieved by baling solid waste was the be between 30 and 40 years. landfill operation in 1979. But the facil- convincing factor for us. The few minor Go-Ahead Given ity began to run out of space and needed problems associated with baling, such as to move to a new site. At the same time, baler downtime, were overshadowed by After Iredell County gave the consul- costly Subtitle D mandates required the the overall benefits of a balefill. Accord- tant the go-ahead to design and oversee county to make more efficient use of the ing to Municipal Engineering, baling the the construction of the new solid waste sparsely available landfill space. solid waste before putting it into the balefill facility, the next step was to find The best choice for a new site was 169 ground achieves, on average, a 45 percent a high-quality, cost-effective solid waste acres of land nestled between Statesville higher compaction rate than conventional baler or, as it turned out, balers. -
Waste Transfer Stations: a Manual for Decision-Making Acknowledgments
Waste Transfer Stations: A Manual for Decision-Making Acknowledgments he Office of Solid Waste (OSW) would like to acknowledge and thank the members of the Solid Waste Association of North America Focus Group and the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council Waste Transfer Station Working Group for reviewing and providing comments on this draft document. We would also like to thank Keith Gordon of Weaver Boos & Gordon, Inc., for providing a technical Treview and donating several of the photographs included in this document. Acknowledgements i Contents Acknowledgments. i Introduction . 1 What Are Waste Transfer Stations?. 1 Why Are Waste Transfer Stations Needed?. 2 Why Use Waste Transfer Stations? . 3 Is a Transfer Station Right for Your Community? . 4 Planning and Siting a Transfer Station. 7 Types of Waste Accepted . 7 Unacceptable Wastes . 7 Public Versus Commercial Use . 8 Determining Transfer Station Size and Capacity . 8 Number and Sizing of Transfer Stations . 10 Future Expansion . 11 Site Selection . 11 Environmental Justice Considerations . 11 The Siting Process and Public Involvement . 11 Siting Criteria. 14 Exclusionary Siting Criteria . 14 Technical Siting Criteria. 15 Developing Community-Specific Criteria . 17 Applying the Committee’s Criteria . 18 Host Community Agreements. 18 Transfer Station Design and Operation . 21 Transfer Station Design . 21 How Will the Transfer Station Be Used? . 21 Site Design Plan . 21 Main Transfer Area Design. 22 Types of Vehicles That Use a Transfer Station . 23 Transfer Technology . 25 Transfer Station Operations. 27 Operations and Maintenance Plans. 27 Facility Operating Hours . 32 Interacting With the Public . 33 Waste Screening . 33 Emergency Situations . 34 Recordkeeping. 35 Environmental Issues. -
Design Narrative for Solid Waste and Recycling System Requirements Alameda County, CA
Design Narrative for Solid Waste and Recycling System Requirements Alameda County, CA | General Services Agency Contact: Karen Cook, 510-208-9754, [email protected] Design Narrative for Solid Waste & Recycling System Requirements For Use on County Government Capital Projects Only Private Owner Projects in Unincorporated Alameda County: Visit https://www.acpwa.org/ Purpose and Scope This document specifies the design requirements for solid waste and recycling systems for facilities built for use by Alameda County, including build-to-suit. It is provided to assist project managers and project design teams with ensuring County operational services needs are met, including: Capacity considerations for expected waste & recyclables generation, Indoor and outdoor space and equipment needs, Path of travel requirements for waste and recyclables from the building to the outdoor enclosure, and Design and access requirements for the outdoor trash enclosure. The waste and recycling system shall be designed to support the minimum diversion of 75% of all the waste generated in the facility per Alameda County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 2008-213, and the 1990 County Charter Amendment known as Measure D, as well as meet the requirements of the Alameda County Mandatory Recycling Ordinance (2012). These requirements do not override any applicable regulations, such as municipal code, and the Design Builder must ensure compliance with such applicable regulations. The waste system should be designed into the facility from the earliest stages, as bin needs inside and the waste enclosure outside may influence the building’s design, layout and budget. This document was developed by the GSA-Sustainability program, with extensive input from affected internal and external stakeholders responsible for managing operations related to waste and recycling. -
Litter Cleanup Guide
Litter Cleanup Guide Table of Contents 2-5 Overview of Planning Steps 6-7 Key Contacts 8-10 Planning Worksheet: Organizing the Publicity 11 Sample Press Release 12 Tips for Working with the Media 13-17 Planning Worksheet: Organizing the Volunteers 18 Planning Worksheet: Cleanup Supplies 19 Planning Worksheet: Safety Tips for Cleanup Volunteers 1 Select a Coordinator The coordinator oversees everyone who is helping to organize the cleanup and is the primary contact on the cleanup day. If you are the coordinator, find people to assist you in organizing the event or form committees that will focus on specific aspects of the cleanup. If the cleanup encompasses a really large area such as multiple neighborhoods, it may help to divide the area into zones and assign a coordinator for each zone. Select a Field Coordinator Although there is an overall coordinator for the cleanup, it is helpful to have a field coordinator, someone who knows the physical environment and can assist the cleanup crews and city personnel the day of the event. The field coordinator coordinates surveying the cleanup site in advance to determine the number of volunteers needed, the locations to send volunteers, and the type, amount and location of trash. This information is sent to the overall coordinator for use by the other committees. Coordinate Planning Participants It is important that no one person has too much to do. Each person should feel like he/she is making a contribution without feeling overwhelmed. Example assignments include: Publicity Volunteers Cleanup Supplies Logistics (trash pickup, location, date, etc.) Celebration Follow-up Set a Date for the Cleanup Set a date and time for the cleanup, preferably two to three months in advance. -
Training Health Workers in the Management of Sharps Waste
Training Health Workers in the Management of Sharps Waste Guide for Training of Waste Handlers Contents 1. Training Overview................................................................................................................43 2. Sharps Waste Overview........................................................................................................45 3. Health Worker Safety ...........................................................................................................48 4. Segregation of Waste ............................................................................................................51 5. Handling, Storage, and Transport of Safety Boxes...............................................................56 6. Overview of Sharps Treatment, Destruction, and Disposal..................................................58 7. Treatment of Sharps: Liquid Disinfection ............................................................................60 8. Treatment of Sharps: Autoclave/Shredding..........................................................................62 9. Treatment of Sharps: Encapsulation .....................................................................................66 10. Treatment and Destruction of Sharps: Incineration..............................................................68 11. Disposal of Removed Needles: Protected Sharps Pit ...........................................................73 12. Disposal of Removed Needles: Protected Sharps Barrel......................................................78