Managing Urban Runoff
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Managing Storm Water Runoff to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water
United States Office of Water EPA 816-F-01-020 Environmental Protection (4606) July 2001 Agency Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin Managing Storm Water Runoff to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water Storm water runoff is rain or snow melt that flows off the land, from streets, roof tops, and lawns. The runoff carries sediment and contaminants with it to a surface water body or infiltrates through the soil to ground water. This fact sheet focuses on the management of runoff in urban environments; other fact sheets address management measures for other specific sources, such as pesticides, animal feeding operations, and vehicle washing. SOURCES OF STORM WATER RUNOFF Urban and suburban areas are predominated by impervious cover including pavements on roads, sidewalks, and parking lots; rooftops of buildings and other structures; and impaired pervious surfaces (compacted soils) such as dirt parking lots, walking paths, baseball fields and suburban lawns. During storms, rainwater flows across these impervious surfaces, mobilizing contaminants, and transporting them to water bodies. All of the activities that take place in urban and suburban areas contribute to the pollutant load of storm water runoff. Oil, gasoline, and automotive fluids drip from vehicles onto roads and parking lots. Storm water runoff from shopping malls and retail centers also contains hydrocarbons from automobiles. Landscaping by homeowners, around businesses, and on public grounds contributes sediments, pesticides, fertilizers, and nutrients to runoff. Construction of roads and buildings is another large contributor of sediment loads to waterways. In addition, any uncovered materials such as improperly stored hazardous substances (e.g., household Parking lot runoff cleaners, pool chemicals, or lawn care products), pet and wildlife wastes, and litter can be carried in runoff to streams or ground water. -
Urban Flooding Mitigation Techniques: a Systematic Review and Future Studies
water Review Urban Flooding Mitigation Techniques: A Systematic Review and Future Studies Yinghong Qin 1,2 1 College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China; [email protected]; Tel.: +86-0771-323-2464 2 College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, 100 University Road, Nanning 530004, China Received: 20 November 2020; Accepted: 14 December 2020; Published: 20 December 2020 Abstract: Urbanization has replaced natural permeable surfaces with roofs, roads, and other sealed surfaces, which convert rainfall into runoff that finally is carried away by the local sewage system. High intensity rainfall can cause flooding when the city sewer system fails to carry the amounts of runoff offsite. Although projects, such as low-impact development and water-sensitive urban design, have been proposed to retain, detain, infiltrate, harvest, evaporate, transpire, or re-use rainwater on-site, urban flooding is still a serious, unresolved problem. This review sequentially discusses runoff reduction facilities installed above the ground, at the ground surface, and underground. Mainstream techniques include green roofs, non-vegetated roofs, permeable pavements, water-retaining pavements, infiltration trenches, trees, rainwater harvest, rain garden, vegetated filter strip, swale, and soakaways. While these techniques function differently, they share a common characteristic; that is, they can effectively reduce runoff for small rainfalls but lead to overflow in the case of heavy rainfalls. In addition, most of these techniques require sizable land areas for construction. The end of this review highlights the necessity of developing novel, discharge-controllable facilities that can attenuate the peak flow of urban runoff by extending the duration of the runoff discharge. -
Living Water
LIVING WITH WATER: LIVING WITH WATER: LESSONS FROM SINGAPORE AND ROTTERDAM Living with Water: Lessons from Singapore and Rotterdam documents the journey of two unique cities, Singapore and Rotterdam—one with too little water, and the other with too LESSONS FROM SINGAPORE AND ROTTERDAM LESSONS much water—in adapting to future climate change impacts. While the WITH social, cultural, and physical nature of these cities could not be more different, Living with Water: Lessons from Singapore and Rotterdam LIVING captures key principles, insights and innovative solutions that threads through their respective adaptation WATER: strategies as they build for an LESSONS FROM uncertain future of sea level rise and intense rainfall. SINGAPORE AND ROTTERDAM LIVING WITH WATER: LESSONS FROM SINGAPORE AND ROTTERDAM CONTENTS About the organisations: v • About the Centre for Liveable Cities v • About the Rotterdam Office of Climate Adaptation v Foreword by Minister for National Development, Singapore vi Foreword by Mayor of Rotterdam viii Preface by the Executive Director, Centre for Liveable Cities x For product information, please contact 1. Introduction 1 +65 66459576 1.1. Global challenges, common solutions 1 Centre for Liveable Cities 1.2. Distilling and sharing knowledge on climate-adaptive cities 6 45 Maxwell Road #07-01 The URA Centre 2. Living with Water: Rotterdam and Singapore 9 Singapore 069118 2.1. Rotterdam’s vision 9 [email protected] 2.1.1. Rotterdam’s approach: Too Much Water 9 2.1.2. Learning to live with more water 20 Cover photo: 2.2. A climate-resilient Singapore 22 Rotterdam (Rotterdam Office of Climate Adaptation) and “Far East Organisation Children’s Garden” flickr photo by chooyutshing 2.2.1. -
Pollutant Association with Suspended Solids in Stormwater in Tijuana, Mexico
Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. (2014) 11:319–326 DOI 10.1007/s13762-013-0214-3 ORIGINAL PAPER Pollutant association with suspended solids in stormwater in Tijuana, Mexico F. T. Wakida • S. Martinez-Huato • E. Garcia-Flores • T. D. J. Pin˜on-Colin • H. Espinoza-Gomez • A. Ames-Lo´pez Received: 24 July 2012 / Revised: 12 February 2013 / Accepted: 23 February 2013 / Published online: 16 March 2013 Ó Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2013 Abstract Stormwater runoff from urban areas is a major Introduction source of many pollutants to water bodies. Suspended solids are one of the main pollutants because of their Stormwater pollution is a major problem in urban areas. association with other pollutants. The objective of this The loadings and concentrations of water pollutants, such study was to evaluate the relationship between suspended as suspended solids, nutrients, and heavy metals, are typi- solids and other pollutants in stormwater runoff in the city cally higher in urban stormwater runoff than in runoff from of Tijuana. Seven sites were sampled during seven rain rural areas (Vaze and Chiew 2004). Stormwater has events during the 2009–2010 season and the different become a significant contributor of pollutants to water particle size fractions were separated by sieving and fil- bodies. These pollutants can be inorganic (e.g. heavy tration. The results have shown that the samples have high metals and nitrates) and/or organic, such as polycyclic concentration of total suspended solids, the values of which aromatic hydrocarbons and phenols from asphalt pavement ranged from 725 to 4,411.6 mg/L. The samples were ana- degradation (Sansalone and Buchberger 1995). -
Probabilistic Assessment of Urban Runoff Erosion Potential
307 Probabilistic assessment of urban runoff erosion potential J.A. Harris and B.J. Adams Abstract: At the planning or screening level of urban development, analytical modeling using derived probability distribution theory is a viable alternative to continuous simulation, offering considerably less computational effort. A new set of analytical probabilistic models is developed for predicting the erosion potential of urban stormwater runoff. The marginal probability distributions for the duration of a hydrograph in which the critical channel velocity is exceeded (termed exceedance duration) are computed using derived probability distribution theory. Exceedance duration and peak channel velocity are two random variables upon which erosion potential is functionally dependent. Reasonable agreement exists between the derived marginal probability distributions for exceedance duration and continuous EPA Stormwater Management Model (SWMM) simulations at more common return periods. It is these events of lower magnitude and higher frequency that are the most significant to erosion-potential prediction. Key words: erosion, stormwater management, derived probability distribution, exceedance duration. Résumé : Au niveau de la planification ou de la sélection en développement urbain, la modélisation analytique au moyen de la théorie de la distribution probabiliste dérivée est une alternative valable à la simulation continue car elle demande un effort computationnel beaucoup moindre. Dans le but de prédire le potentiel d’érosion par des eaux de ruissellement en milieu urbain, un nouvel ensemble de modèles probabilistes analytiques a été développé. Les distributions de probabilité marginales pour la durée d’un hydrogramme dans lequel la vélocité critique de courant dans le canal est dépassée (appelé durée de dépassement) sont calculées en utilisant la théorie de la distribution de probabilité dérivée. -
Kallang River to Be Rejuvenated
Kallang River to Be Rejuvenated On 29 March, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) launched a new exhibition titled “A River Runs Through It”. This exhibition is a call for public feedback on a preliminary conceptual plan to improve connectivity along the 14kmlong Kallang River, and to revitalise the areas around it. Minister for National Development and Second Minister for Finance Mr Lawrence Wong officiated at the launch of the exhibition. Potential for Rejuvenation Aerial view of possible enhancements along the Kallang River The Kallang River is Singapore’s longest natural river. Originating from Lower Peirce Reservoir, the river passes through many housing and industrial areas such as Ang Mo Kio, Bishan, Toa Payoh, Bendemeer, and Kallang Bahru before merging into the Kallang Basin. Some 800,000 people now live within 2km of the Kallang River. Over the next 20 years, there is potential to introduce another 100,000 dwelling units into the area. Waterfront rejuvenation started in the 1980s in Singapore, following the cleanup of both the Singapore River and the Kallang Basin. Over the past 30 years, the government has focused on the Singapore River, Marina Bay, and the Kallang Basin. The time is ripe to begin discussions about the further rejuvenation of the Kallang River. URA also hopes to upgrade underpasses and to build new ones in the area, including one under Sims Avenue that would help connect Kallang MRT station to the Singapore Sports Hub. Pedestrian crossings at Serangoon Road and Bendemeer Road are also expected to be widened to facilitate cycling. The existing CTE crossing could be widened and deepened for a more conducive environment for active mobility Currently, cyclists travelling along the Kallang River face several obstacles, including an 83step climb with their bicycles up a pedestrian overhead bridge across the PanIsland Expressway (PIE) and a 47 step descent on the other side. -
From Design to Data: Water Quality Monitoring
From Design to Data: Water Quality Monitoring Adapted from Healthy Water, Healthy People Educators Guide – www.projectwet.org Students create a study design, then analyze the data to simulate the process of water quality monitoring. Contents Summary and Objectives.....................................................................................Page 1 Background........................................................................................................Page 1 Warm Up............................................................................................................Page 3 Water Quality Monitoring Parameters....................................................................Page 4 The Activity: Part I...............................................................................................Page 4 The Activity: Part II..............................................................................................Page 5 Wrap Up............................................................................................................Page 6 Assessment & Extensions...................................................................................Page 6 Table Monitoring Goals - Teacher Copy Page.........................................................Page 7 Table Monitoring Worksheet - Student Copy Page..................................................Page 8 Kallang River Worksheet - Student Copy Page.......................................................Page 9 Kallang River Data Set - Student Copy Page.............................................................Page -
Singapore's Abc Waters
Singapore’s ABC Waters Programme 活力,美丽,清洁的新加坡水环境计划 SINGAPORE’S ABC WATERS THE BLUE MAP OF SINGAPORE 新加坡的蓝图 17 reservoirs 水库 32 rivers 河流 7,000 km of waterways and drains 公里的水路与排水 ABC WATERS PROGRAMME ABC 水域计划 Launched in 2006 2006 ACTIVE 活力的 BEAUTIFUL 美丽的 CLEAN 清洁的 New Recreational Spaces Integration of waters Improved Water Quality 新休闲空间 with urban landscape 改进水体水质 水与城市景观一体化 Typical concrete waterways 典型混凝土排水水路 Copyright © Centre for Liveable Cities Early attempts at beautifying waterbodies 美化水体的早期尝试 Sungei Api Api 阿比阿比河 Pang Sua Pond 榜耍塘 Copyright © Centre for Liveable Cities ABC WATERS PROJECTS ABC 水域项目 SUNGEI API API AND SUNGEI TAMPINES KALLANG RIVER (POTONG PASIR) – ROCHOR CANAL SUNGEI PUNGGOL Source: PUB, Singapore’s water agency ABC Waters @ Bishan Ang Mo Kio Park Before 整治前 ABC Waters @ Bishan Ang Mo Kio Park Completed 2012 整治后 2012 Integrating the design with the surroundings 设计与环 境相结合 Meditative atmosphere: Proximity to Lower serene zone Dog run, bicycle and skates Peirce Reservoir: rental in the old Bishan tranquil and quiet link Park: active recreation to the Central zone Catchment Nature Ponds in the old Reserve Bishan Park: improved and integrated with the cleansing biotope Pond Gardens River Plains 河道平原 水塘花园 Availability of space allows for the river to boldly meander into the park Source: PUB, Singapore’s water agency ABC Waters @ Kallang River – Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park Soil bioengineering techniques Rip Rap w/ Cuttings 其他植被 Gabion Wall 石笼网墙 Reed Roll 芦苇 Reed Roll 芦苇 KALLANG RIVER @ BISHAN-ANG MO KIO PARK 石笼网,植被层,木框架挡土墙 -
Report on Key Conclusions and Recommendations of the Expert Panel on Drainage Design and Flood Protection Measures
Report on Key Conclusions and Recommendations of the Expert Panel on Drainage Design and Flood Protection Measures January 2012 This report documents the key findings and recommendations of the Expert Panel on Drainage Design and Flood Protection Measures. The text in this report may be reproduced free of charge, provided it is reproduced accurately, not used in any misleading context , and the source of the information is acknowledged. Executive Summary Executive Summary The Expert Panel on Drainage Design and Flood Protection Measures was appointed by the Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources on 30 June 2011 to review all flood protection and risk management measures that will be implemented in Singapore over the next decade. Over the span of 6 months, the Panel reviewed the Public Utility Board’s (PUB) drainage planning assumptions and parameters; identified innovative and cost-effective solutions; and proposed improvements to ensure public resilience to floods. This Executive Summary presents the key conclusions and recommendations of the Expert Panel Report. (I) Singapore’s achievements in flood management and prevention 2 The Panel noted that much good work has been done by PUB in managing the drainage and flood situation in Singapore over the past 30 – 40 years, despite the rapid urbanization. In terms of storm drainage, Singapore compares well with other metropolitan areas. (II) Rainfall intensities have increased over the past few decades, and are likely to increase in the future 3 In Singapore, heavy rainfall events impose varying constraints on its drainage systems. Extreme discharges can result from events ranging from high intensity storms lasting less than an hour to prolonged rainstorm events with moderate rainfall intensities. -
Problems and Solutions for Managing Urban Stormwater Runoff
Rained Out: Problems and Solutions for Managing Urban Stormwater Runoff Roopika Subramanian* The Clean Water Rule was the latest attempt by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers to define “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. While both politics and scholarship around this issue have typically centered on the jurisdictional status of rural waters, like ephemeral streams and vernal pools, the final Rule raised a less discussed issue of the jurisdictional status of urban waters. What was striking about the Rule’s exemption of “stormwater control features” was not that it introduced this urban issue, but that it highlighted the more general challenges of regulating stormwater runoff under the Clean Water Act, particularly the difficulty of incentivizing multibenefit land use management given the Act’s focus on pollution control. In this Note, I argue that urban stormwater runoff is more than a pollution-control problem. Its management also dramatically affects the intensity of urban water flow and floods, local groundwater recharge, and ecosystem health. In light of these impacts on communities and watersheds, I argue that the Clean Water Act, with its present limited pollution- control goal, is an inadequate regulatory driver to address multiple stormwater-management goals. I recommend advancing green infrastructure as a multibenefit solution and suggest that the best approach to accelerate its adoption is to develop decision-support tools for local government agencies to collaborate on green infrastructure projects. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 422 I. Urban Stormwater Runoff .................................................................... 424 A. Urban Stormwater Runoff: Multiple Challenges ........................... 425 B. Urban Stormwater Infrastructure Built to Drain: Local Responses to Urban Flooding ....................................................... -
The Causes of Urban Stormwater Pollution
THE CAUSES OF URBAN STORMWATER POLLUTION Some Things To Think About Runoff pollution occurs every time rain or snowmelt flows across the ground and picks up contaminants. It occurs on farms or other agricultural sites, where the water carries away fertilizers, pesticides, and sediment from cropland or pastureland. It occurs during forestry operations (particularly along timber roads), where the water carries away sediment, and the nutrients and other materials associated with that sediment, from land which no longer has enough living vegetation to hold soil in place. This information, however, focuses on runoff pollution from developed areas, which occurs when stormwater carries away a wide variety of contaminants as it runs across rooftops, roads, parking lots, baseball diamonds, construction sites, golf courses, lawns, and other surfaces in our City. The oily sheen on rainwater in roadside gutters is but one common example of urban runoff pollution. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) now considers pollution from all diffuse sources, including urban stormwater pollution, to be the most important source of contamination in our nation's waters. 1 While polluted runoff from agricultural sources may be an even more important source of water pollution than urban runoff, urban runoff is still a critical source of contamination, particularly for waters near cities -- and thus near most people. EPA ranks urban runoff and storm-sewer discharges as the second most prevalent source of water quality impairment in our nation's estuaries, and the fourth most prevalent source of impairment of our lakes. Most of the U.S. population lives in urban and coastal areas where the water resources are highly vulnerable to and are often severely degraded by urban runoff. -
One Party Dominance Survival: the Case of Singapore and Taiwan
One Party Dominance Survival: The Case of Singapore and Taiwan DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Lan Hu Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor R. William Liddle Professor Jeremy Wallace Professor Marcus Kurtz Copyrighted by Lan Hu 2011 Abstract Can a one-party-dominant authoritarian regime survive in a modernized society? Why is it that some survive while others fail? Singapore and Taiwan provide comparable cases to partially explain this puzzle. Both countries share many similar cultural and developmental backgrounds. One-party dominance in Taiwan failed in the 1980s when Taiwan became modern. But in Singapore, the one-party regime survived the opposition’s challenges in the 1960s and has remained stable since then. There are few comparative studies of these two countries. Through empirical studies of the two cases, I conclude that regime structure, i.e., clientelistic versus professional structure, affects the chances of authoritarian survival after the society becomes modern. This conclusion is derived from a two-country comparative study. Further research is necessary to test if the same conclusion can be applied to other cases. This research contributes to the understanding of one-party-dominant regimes in modernizing societies. ii Dedication Dedicated to the Lord, Jesus Christ. “Counsel and sound judgment are mine; I have insight, I have power. By Me kings reign and rulers issue decrees that are just; by Me princes govern, and nobles—all who rule on earth.” Proverbs 8:14-16 iii Acknowledgments I thank my committee members Professor R.