Wfp & Cp Warehouse Locations
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cholera in South Sudan Situation Report # 95 As at 23:59 Hours, 29 September to 5 October 2014
Republic of South Sudan Cholera in South Sudan Situation Report # 95 as at 23:59 Hours, 29 September to 5 October 2014 Situation Update As of 5 October 2014, a total of 6,139 cholera cases including 139 deaths (CFR 2%) had been reportedTable 1. Summary in South of Suda choleran as cases summarizedreported in in Juba Tables County 1 and, 23 2.April – 5 October 2014 New New New deaths Total cases Total Total admisions discharges Total Total cases Reporting Sites 29 Sept to currently facility community Total cases 29 Sept to 29 Sept to deaths discharged 5 Oct 2014 admitted deaths deaths 5 Oct 2014 5 Oct 2014 JTH CTC 0 0 0 0 16 0 16 1466 1482 Gurei CTC (changed to ORP) Closed 28 July 2 0 2 365 367 Tongping CTC 0 2 1 3 69 72 Closed August Jube 3/UN House CTC Closed August 0 0 0 0 97 97 Nyakuron West CTC Closed 15 July 0 0 0 18 18 Gumbo CTC Closed 5 July 0 0 0 48 48 Nyakuron ORP Closed 5 July 0 0 0 20 20 Munuki ORP Closed 5 July 0 0 0 8 8 Gumbo ORP Closed 15 July 0 3 3 67 70 Pager PHCU 0 0 0 0 1 5 6 42 48 Other sites 0 0 0 1 15 16 1 17 Total 0 0 0 0 22 24 46 2201 2247 N.B. To prevent double counting of patients, transferred cases from ORPs to CTCs are not counted in the ORPs. Table 2: Summary of cholera cases reported outside Juba County, 23 April – 5 October 2014 New New New Total cases Total Total admisions discharges deaths Total Total cases Total States Reporting Sites currently facility community 29 Sept to 29 Sept to 29 Sep to deaths discharged cases admitted deaths deaths 5 Oct 2014 5 Oct 2014 5 Oct 14 Kajo-Keji civil hospital 0 0 0 0 -
Ss 9303 Ee Kapoeta North Cou
SOUTH SUDAN Kapoeta North County reference map SUDAN Pibor JONGLEI ETHIOPIA CAR DRC KENYA UGANDA EASTERN EQUATORIA Kenyi Lafon Kapoeta East Akitukomoi Kangitabok Lomokori Kapoeta North Ngigalingatun Kangibun Kalopedet Lokidangoai Nomogonjet Nawitapal Mogos Chokagiling Lorutuk Lokoges Nakwa Owetiani Nawabei Natatur Kamaliato Kanyowokol Karibungura Lokale Nagira Belengtobok Tuliabok Lokorechoke Kadapangolol Akoribok Nakwaparich Kalobeliang Wana Kachinga Lomus Lotiakara Pucwa Lopetet Nawao Lokorilam Naduket Tingayta Lodomei Kibak Nakatiti International boundary Nakapangiteng Napusiret Napulak State boundary Loriwo County boundary Kochoto Naminitotit Parpar Undetermined boundary Napusireit Nakwamoru Abyei region Kotak Kasotongor Napochorege Katiakin Nawayareng Riwoto Lokorumor Country capital Nangoletire Lokualem Lumeyen Logerain Lomidila Takankim Lobei Administrative centre/County capital Lokwamor Nacukut Naronyi Nakoret Lotiekar Namukeris Principal town Napotit Naoyatir Nakore Napureit Secondary town Lokwamiro Narubui Barach Lolepon Lotiri Paima Village Loregai Narongyet Lochuloit Kabuni Primary road Kudule Locheler Napusiria Napotpot Secondary road Nacholobo Tertiary road Budi Idong Main river Kapoeta South 0 5 10 km The administrative boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Final boundary between the Republic of Sudan and the Republic of South Sudan has not yet been determined. Final status of Abyei area is not yet determined. Created: March 2020 | Code: SS-9303 | Sources: OCHA, SSNBS | Feedback: [email protected] | unocha.org/south-sudan | reliefweb.int/country/ssd | southsudan.humanitarianresponse.info . -
LC SS 706 A1 EEQ 20130301.Pdf
pp p ! ! p ! p (! ! !( 32°0'0"E 33°0'0"E 34°0'0"E 35°0'0"E Gwalla Awan KolnyangAluk Katanich Titong Munini Beru ! R . K Wowa ang en Logoda N Rigl Chilimun N " " 0 0 p' Bor South County ' 0 Pibor County Lowelli Katchikan River Bellel Kichepo 0 ° Maktiweng J O N G L E I ° 6 Kaigo 6 Lochiret R. Naro Kenamuke Swamp R Ngechele . S Neria u p Kanopir Natibok Kabalatigo i r i ( B Moru Kimod a Rongada h r Yebisak e g l- n Tombi J o e b b l Shogle e a l) Buka h C . Gwojo-Adung Kassangor R Baro ! E T H I O P I A Moru Kerri KURON Kuron Gigging p Bojo-Ajut Gemmaiza ! Karn Ethi Kerkeng Moru Ethi Nakadocwa Poko Wani Terekeka County Kobowen Swamp Borichadi Bokuna Poko Kassengo Selemani Pagar Nabwel Wani Mika Chabong Tukara C E N T R A L p River Nakua p Kenyi E Q U A T O R I A Moru Angbin Mukajo Gali Owiyabong Kursomba Lotimor Bulu Koli Kalaruz Awakot Katima Waha ! Akitukomoi River Gera Tumu Nanyangachor Nyabongi Napalap ! Namoropus Natilup Swamp ) it Wanyang Kangitabok Lomokori le Eyata Moru Kolinyagkopil il ! Terakeka ri Lozut Lomongole t iti o (! S L Magara p R. ( n Umm Gura Mwanyakapin a p y l Abuilingakine Lomareng Plateau a Dogora R Ngigalingatun k o . L Jelli L o p Rambo Djie Navi . Lokodopotok Nyaginei Kangeleng p R Biyara Nai A o Kworijik Kangibun Lomuleye Katirima t o Simsima Badigeru Swamp River Lokuja Losagam k Musha Lukwatuk Pass Doinyoro East p o p l Balala Legeri Buboli Kalopedet Pongo River Lokorowa Watha Peth Hills Bume E A S T E R N E Q U A T O R I A Lokidangoai Nawitapal Lopokori Lokomarukest Kolobeleng Yakara Dogatwan Nomogonjet Kagethi ! Mogos Bala Pool Lapon County Lotakawa Kanyabu Moru Ethi Donyiro West Donyiro Cliff Kedowa Kothokan a l l i Chokagiling t Karakamuge o Mangalla Bwoda L Mediket Kaliapus Nyangatom !( . -
South Sudan: Jonglei – “We Have Always Been at War”
South Sudan: Jonglei – “We Have Always Been at War” Africa Report N°221 | 22 December 2014 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Jonglei’s Conflicts Before the Civil War ........................................................................... 3 A. Perpetual Armed Rebellion ....................................................................................... 3 B. The Politics of Inter-Communal Conflict .................................................................. 4 1. The communal is political .................................................................................... 4 2. Mixed messages: Government response to intercommunal violence ................. 7 3. Ethnically-targeted civilian disarmament ........................................................... 8 C. Region over Ethnicity? Shifting Alliances between the Bahr el Ghazal Dinka, Greater Bor Dinka and Nuer ...................................................................................... 9 III. South Sudan’s Civil War in Jonglei .................................................................................. 12 A. Armed Factions in Jonglei ........................................................................................ -
Conflict Trends, Issue 1 (2012)
IS S U E 1 , 2 0 1 2 20 YEARS OF CONTRIBUTING TO PEACE ct1|2012 contents EDITORIAL 2 by Vasu Gounden FEATURES 3 Assessing the African Union’s Response to the Libyan Crisis by Sadiki Koko and Martha Bakwesegha-Osula 11 Emergent Conflict Resolution at Sea off Africa by Francois Vreÿ 19 Morocco’s Equity and Reconciliation Commission: A New Paradigm for Transitional Justice by Catherine Skroch 27 Crowdsourcing as a Tool in Conflict Prevention by Anne Kahl, Christy McConnell and William Tsuma 35 The Boko Haram Uprising and Insecurity in Nigeria: Intelligence Failure or Bad Governance? by Odomovo S. Afeno 42 Unclear Criteria for Statehood and its Implications for Peace and Stability In Africa by Abebe Aynete 49 A Critical Analysis of Cultural Explanations for the Violence in Jonglei State, South Sudan by Øystein H. Rolandsen and Ingrid Marie Breidlid conflict trends I 1 editorial By vasu gounden The African Centre for the Constructive Resolution of their respective peace negotiations as well as several of Disputes (ACCORD) was established in 1992. In that year the government delegations which have participated in we set as our mission: “ACCORD seeks to encourage and the peace negotiations. We have assisted mediators and promote the constructive resolution of disputes by the facilitators with mediation process strategies and thematic peoples of Africa and so assist in achieving political stability, knowledge, trained election observers in conflict resolution economic recovery and peaceful co-existence within just and skills, prepared peacekeepers in the civilian dimensions democratic societies”. To achieve this mission, over the 20 of peacekeeping, and established and implemented years of its existence ACCORD has employed some 200 full- reconciliation and post-conflict reconstruction initiatives. -
Jonglei State, South Sudan Introduction Key Findings
Situation Overview: Jonglei State, South Sudan January to March 2019 Introduction Map 1: REACH assessment coverage METHODOLOGY of Jonglei State, January 2019 To provide an overview of the situation in hard-to- Insecurity related to cattle raiding and inter- Map 3: REACH assessment coverage of Jonglei State, March 2019 reach areas of Jonglei State, REACH uses primary communal violence reported across various data from key informants who have recently arrived parts of Jonglei continued to impact the from, recently visited, or receive regular information ability to cultivate food and access basic Fangak Canal/Pigi from a settlement or “Area of Knowledge” (AoK). services, sustaining large-scale humanitarian Nyirol Information for this report was collected from key needs in Jonglei State, South Sudan. Ayod informants in Bor Protection of Civilians site, Bor By March 2019, approximately 5 months Town and Akobo Town in Jonglei State in January, since the harvest season, settlements February and March 2019. Akobo Duk Uror struggled to extend food rations to the In-depth interviews on humanitarian needs were Twic Pochalla same extent as reported in previous years. Map 2: REACH assessment coverage East conducted throughout the month using a structured of Jonglei State, February 2019 survey tool. After data collection was completed, To inform humanitarian actors working Bor South all data was aggregated at settlement level, and outside formal settlement sites, REACH has Pibor settlements were assigned the modal or most conducted assessments of hard-to-reach credible response. When no consensus could be areas in South Sudan since December found for a settlement, that settlement was not Assessed settlements 2015. -
Cholera in South Sudan Situation Report # 93 As at 23:59 Hours, 15-21 September 2014
Republic of South Sudan Cholera in South Sudan Situation Report # 93 as at 23:59 Hours, 15-21 September 2014 Situation Update As of 21 September 2014, a total of 6,128 cholera cases including 139 deaths (CFR 2.27%) had beenTable reported1. Summary in of South cholera Sudan cases asreported summarized in Juba in County Tables, 23 1 April and –2.21 September 2014 New New New deaths Total cases Total Total admisions discharges Total Total cases Reporting Sites 15-21 Sept currently facility community Total cases 15-21 Sept 15-21 Sept deaths discharged 2014 admitted deaths deaths 2014 2014 JTH CTC 3 3 0 0 16 0 16 1455 1479 Gurei CTC (changed to ORP) Closed 28 July 2 0 2 365 367 Tongping CTC 0 2 1 3 69 72 Closed August Jube 3/UN House CTC Closed August 0 0 0 0 97 97 Nyakuron West CTC Closed 15 July 0 0 0 18 18 Gumbo CTC Closed 5 July 0 0 0 48 48 Nyakuron ORP Closed 5 July 0 0 0 20 20 Munuki ORP Closed 5 July 0 0 0 8 8 Gumbo ORP Closed 15 July 0 3 3 67 70 Pager PHCU 1 1 0 0 1 5 6 42 48 Other sites 0 0 0 1 15 16 1 17 Total 4 4 0 0 22 24 46 2190 2244 N.B. To prevent double counting of patients, transferred cases from ORPs to CTCs are not counted in the ORPs. Table 2: Summary of cholera cases reported outside Juba County, 23 April –21 September 2014 New New New Total cases Total Total admisions discharges deaths Total Total cases Total States Reporting Sites currently facility community 15-21 Sept 15-21 Sept 15-21 deaths discharged cases admitted deaths deaths 2014 2014 Sept 2014 Kajo-Keji civil hospital 0 0 0 0 3 4 7 86 93 CES Yei Hospital -- 0 -
Rapid Response Mechanism in South Sudan
THE WFP-UNICEF RAPID RESPONSE MECHANISM IN SOUTH SUDAN ONE YEAR ON RESULTS, CHALLENGES AND WAY FORWARD MAY 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Background 2 The RRM as a Mechanism for Integrated Response 4 How does it Work? Modalities for Rapid Response 6 The RRM One Year On - Results and Achievements 10 Contribution of the RRM in the Overall Response 14 Challenges and Constraints 20 The Way Forward 26 Donors and Partners 28 Cover page: People gathering ahead of registration and distributions during a Rapid Response mission by WFP and UNICEF in Nyanapol, Ayod County, Jonglei© UNICEF UK/2015/S. Modola All data is as of 15 April 2015 for the period March 2014 to March 2015, unless otherwise indicated. Report prepared for UNICEF South Sudan and WFP South Sudan by JS. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY critical child protection services. Starting up with core funds, both agencies partnered with more From day one of its existence as an independent than fifty local and international organisations and nation, South Sudan grappled with the enduring leg- gathered support from donors and humanitarian acy of years of conflict. Risen from a decades-long partners operating in South Sudan. struggle for its freedom, the world’s youngest coun- One year on, more than 1.34 million people were try nevertheless saw a tremendous wave of hope reached by WFP general food distribution, includ- among its people, unleashed by South Sudan’s in- ing 220,000 children under 5 who received blan- dependence in July 2011. ket supplementary feeding in areas targeted under Yet, less than a thousand days later, South Sudan the RRM. -
Wfp & Cp Warehouse Locations
!( (! (! (! (! (! (! (! !( (! (! !( (! (! (! (! (! !( (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! !( ! (! (! (! ( (! (! (! @ (! (! (! (! (! (! (! !( (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! !( (! 24°0'0"E 25°0'0"E ! 26°0'0"E 27°0'0"E 28°0'0"E 29°0'0"E 30°0'0"E 31°0'0"E 32°0'0"E 33°0'0"E 34°0'0"E 35°0'0"E 36°0'0"E 37°0'0"E (! ( Mogara (!Umm Shalkha Tumbo t (! p t s m Qawz Baya e Sineit m t (! 0 (! Buhera (! i 0 l 0 ! Saq An Na`am t ( ! Beringil i ( t ! 0 ( 5 Singeiwa Baddal c Labado m n ! 4 a N N ( ! - ( Nyala (! (! e Dilling 5 ! Shaqq El Khad - ( " " F ) Tumko ! Um Labasa (! ( 7 Ð ) 0 Sigeir Umm Sawum 0 Kalma m ! e ' ! ( ' ( 2 @ Um Kurdus ! Gerger - Kila ! ( ( e 4 Saheib g ! 3 ) 0 ! ( (! 0 !( ( El Lait g a (! Mabrouka Shaqq Al Huja 2 ° ° (! 8 x r Diri Tono (! ! (! a ( x Buddu 72 Akoc x ! T 2 War-Awar 2 ( o (! n 0 5 (! Kumbilah2 p Abu Sufyan t n 0 Aweil North County a 1 1 Wa re h ou s e . (! (! !( ! 1 M Shuwayy (! ( S a Abou Adid Dalami ( 1 Rashad El Roseires (! 6 @ ! Al Muturwed l ( Um Sarir l Ð Twic County ( (! (! ! ! M ( ( ( P Ariath ! s a @ (! ( a Dashi s s ! Ca pa c i tie s 2 0 1 2 t ( Ed Damazin c (! Manyo County 66 Renk H H H o H ! Dago o ( l ! p Wad Hassib o (! Qawz Baya Keikei ( (! ! Renk W R W F L W T ! 71 Akak ( Abu Gheid Ð ID LOCATION STATE (! ( Aw(!eil East County p (! @Î!( Solwong Murr Birkatulli @ 1 Juba CES WFP 0 12 2 3,300 0 10,000 (! (! Ð (! (! Qubba Malualkon ! (! Um@m Labassa Girru p 82 Mayen Pajok 88 Wunrok ( p ! Abu Ajura !( Ma'aliah 1 2 Kapoeta EES WFP 3 10 3 0 0 7,250 (! ( ! Ð (! Um La`ota Abu Karinka (! (! @37 Malualkon (! (! -
Southern Sudan at Odds with Itself
Allen et al. Schomerus ‘I found the report fascinating and also disturbing in equal measure. …While state building efforts are rightly focused on building up structures from the ground they fail to address the primary need to ensure that such institutions are properly reformed to become independent and impartial institutions…To address these pressing issues and to maximise the positive momentum generated SOUTHERN ODD SUDAN AT from the elections and the international focus on Southern Sudan at this time, these issues needs to be discussed publicly with all key states, governments and civil society stakeholders who hold the future of Southern Sudan in their hands. I would urge action sooner rather than later.’ Akbar Khan, Director, Legal & Constitutional Affairs Division, Commonwealth Secretariat ‘The great strength of the report is the accuracy of its voicing of common concerns – it forms an excellent representation of people’s perceptions and experiences, making an important corollary to the current focus on high-level political negotiations and structures. As the report emphasises at the outset, the current focus of Sudanese governments and their international advisors on the technicalities and procedural aspects of planning for the referendum and its outcome needs to be countered by the more holistic approach advocated by this report.’ Cherry Leonardi, Durham University ‘A very important and timely contribution to the current debates…The report offers an invaluable S insight in some of the key issues and dilemma’s Southern Sudan and -
State-Building South Sudan: Discourses, Practices and Actors Of
State-building South Sudan : discourses, practices and actors of a negotiated project ( 1999-2013) Sara De Simone To cite this version: Sara De Simone. State-building South Sudan : discourses, practices and actors of a negotiated project ( 1999-2013). Political science. Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - Paris I, 2016. English. <NNT : 2016PA01D083>. <tel-01635763> HAL Id: tel-01635763 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01635763 Submitted on 15 Nov 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Universit{ degli studi di Napoli “L’Orientale” Dottorato di Ricerca in Africanistica XII ciclo N.S. Realizzato in Cotutela con Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne École Doctorale en Science Politique State-building South Sudan. Discourses, Practices and Actors of a Negotiated Project (1999-2013) Relatrice prof.ssa Candidata Maria Cristina Ercolessi Sara de Simone Relatrice prof.ssa Johanna Siméant Coordinatrice del Dottorato in Africanistica Anno accademico 2014-2015 Abstract State-building programs supported by the international donor community since the end of the 1990s in ‘post-conflict’ contexts have often been considered ineffective. Analyzing the state-building enterprise in South Sudan in a historical perspective, this thesis shows how these programs, portrayed as technical and apolitical, intertwine with the longer term process of state formation with its cumulative and negotiated character. -
Guinea Worm Wrap Up
Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and Prevention (CDC) Memorandum Date: January 9, 2012 From: WHO Collaborating Center for Research, Training and Eradication of Dracunculiasis Subject: GUINEA WORM WRAP-UP #209 To: Addressees 2011: 41% FEWER CASES. 2012: GOING FOR THE GOLD In January-December 2011, a provisional total of 1,060 cases of Guinea worm disease were reported from 483 villages, of which only 142 villages reported indigenous cases. 74% of the cases in 2011 were contained, compared to 75% of cases reportedly contained in 2010. This is an overall reduction of 41% in cases worldwide, compared to 2010. 1,030 (97%) of the cases in 2011 were reported from South Sudan, while Mali reported 12 cases, Chad reported 10 cases, and Ethiopia reported 8 cases (FIGURE 1), for a total of only 30 cases reported worldwide outside of South Sudan. Figure 1 Distribution By Country of 1,060 Reported Cases of Dracunculiasis: 2011* Number of cases 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 South Sudan 1,030 Mali 12 Chad Outbreak 10 *Provisional. Cases reported Jan - Dec 2010 = 1,797 Cases reported Jan - Dec 2011 = 1,060 % Change in cases = - 41% Transmission was reportedly prevented from 784 (74%) of 1,060 cases reported. Ethiopia 8 Includes two cases imported into Ethiopia from Southern Sudan. The goal for 2012 is to contain EVERY case of Guinea worm disease, EVERYWHERE. Table 1 Number of Cases Contained and Number Reported by Month during 2011* (Countries arranged in descending order of cases in 2010) NUMBER OF CASES CONTAINED / NUMBER OF CASES REPORTED COUNTRIES REPORTING CASES % JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER TOTAL* CONT.