Cultural-Historical Approaches to Designing for Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology Edited by JAAN VALSINER Clark University and ALBERTO ROSA Universidad Autonoma de Madrid .,.,.:i..,, CAMBRIDGE ;:; UNIVERSITY PRESS CONTENTS vii 21 The Creation of New Cultures in Peer Interaction 444 William A. Corsaro and Berit 0. Johannesen 22 "Culture Has No Internal Territory": Culture as Dialogue Eugene Matusov, Mark Smith, Maria Alburquerque Candela, and Keren Lilu 23 Cultural-Historical Approaches to Designing for Development Michael Cole and Yrjo Engestrom 24 Money as a Cultural Tool Mediating Personal Relationships: Child Development of Exchange and Possession Toshiya Yamamoto and Noboru Takahashi 25 The Family: Negotiating Cultural Values Nandita Chaudhary PA RT VI: F R O M S O C I A L C U LT U R E T O P E RS O NA L C U LT U RE 26 Culture and Social Representations 543 Gerard Duveen 27 The Institutions Inside: Self, Morality, and Culture Fiero Paolicchi 28 Identity, Rights, and Duties: The Illustrative Case of Positioning by Iran, the United States, and the European Union Fathali M. Moghaddam and Kathryn A. Kavulich 29 Symbolic Politics and Cultural Symbols: Identity Formation Between and Beyond Nations and States 5 9 1 Ulf Hedetoft 30 The Dialogical Self: Social, Personal, and (Un)Conscious 608 Joao Salgado and Miguel Gon~alves ·•· PA RT VII: M AK I N G S E N S E O F T H E PAS T F O R T H E F U TU RE : MEMORY AND SELF-REFLECTION 31 Social and Cognitive Determinants of Collective Memory for Public Events Guglielmo Bellelli, Antonietta Curci, and Giovanna Leone 32 Collective Memory James V Wertsch 33 Issues in the Socio-Cultural Study of Memory: Making Memory Matter David Middleton and Steven D. Brown 34 The Social Basis of Self-Reflection Alex Gillespie General Conclusions: Socio-Cultural Psychology on the Move: Semiotic Methodology in the Making Alberto Rosa and Jaan Valsiner Index CHAPTER 23 Cultural-Historical Approaches to Designing for Development Michael Cole and Yrjo Engestrom The goal of this chapter is to summarize the­ In the century since Vygotsky wrote these ory and research descended from Vygotsky ideas, mainstream psychology, which has and his followers that takes seriously the generally accorded culture only a peripheral idea that practice is essential for testing role in human nature, has firmly institution­ and improving theory. We refer to this alized precisely the division between theory approach as "cultural-historical activity the­ and practice ("basic versus applied research") ory" (CH/AT) (Cole, 1996; Engestrom, 1999; against which Vygotsky was arguing. Never­ Engestrom, Miettinen, & Punamaki, 1999; theless, we believe that Marx and Vygotsky Roth, Hwang, Goulart, & Lee 2005). were correct - the implementation of the­ This approach to theory and practice, ory in practice is not a marginal scientific which is frequently traced back to Marx, was goal in the study of human development - clearly articulated by Vygotsky, for whom it is essential to understanding the complex the use of Marxism in psychology was a life­ interplay of different life processes, "in life," long concern: not just in theory. As Engestrom (1993: 98) put it, "The epistemology of activity theory Practice pervades the deepest foundations transcends the dichotomy between theory of the scientific operation and reforms it and practice." from beginning to end. Practice sr;;rs the tasks and seroes as the supreme judge of theory, as its truth criterion ... The most complex contradictions of psycholog­ Cultural-Historical Activity ical methodolol!Jl are transferred to the Theory (CH/AT) ground of practice and only there can they be solved. There the debate stops beingfruit­ Cultural-historical activity theory (CH/ AT) less, it comes to an end. (Vygotsky, 192 7I brings together ideas associated with the 1997: 305-306) names of L. S. Vygotsky, A. R. Luria, and CULTURAL-HISTORICAL APPROACHES TO DESIGNING FOR DEVELOPMENT A. N. Leontiev. It has been common in opposing views weight different aspects of recent years to emphasize differences bet­ the dynamic system of development differ­ ween Vygotsky and Luria, on the one hand, ently, or view them from a slightly different and Leontiev on the other (van der Veer & perspective in their overall approaches, they Valsiner, 1991). According to such interpre­ treat activity and mediation as two aspects tations, Vygotsky and Luria are best asso­ of a single, whole in human life world. ciated with the principle that the distin­ guishing characteristic of specifically human psychological functions is that they are cul­ Some Basic Principles Used in turally mediated: 'The central fact of human CH/ AT-Inspired Intervention existence is mediation" (Vygotsky, 1997'. Research 138). By contrast, so the story goes, Leon­ tiev believed that his colleagues overem­ Keeping in mind that there are a variety phasized the cultural mediation of thought of views on important issues among those and underemphasized the embeddedness identified as CH/ AT theorists, the follow­ of thought in human activity. It might be ing are some theoretical principles generated argued that a significant disagreement exists from this position that have been tested in to this day among those who consider Vygot­ the intervention studies we review in this sky and his colleagues as a starting point chapter. for constructing a theory of human devel­ opment and those who start with Leon­ 1. Mediation through artifacts. The initial tiev (1978). According to this line of inter­ premise of the Russian cultural-historical pretation, those who follow Vygotsky have school was that human psychological pro­ focused attention on processes of mediation, cesses entail a form of behavior in which adopting "mediated action" as a basic unit material objects are modified by human of analysis (Wertsch, del Rio, & Alvarez, beings as a means of regulating their inter­ 199 5; Zinchenko, 198 5). By contrast, follow­ actions with the world and each other. As ers of Leontiev are said to choose "activity" A. R. Luria put it, artifacts incorporated into as a basic unit of analysis (Engestri::im, 1987; human action not only "radically change his Kaptelinin, 1996). 1 conditions of existence, they even react on The basic impulse underlying a CH/ AT him in that they effect a change in him and approach is to reject this either/or dichoto­ his psychic condition" (Luria, 1928: 493). my. Instead, adherents of a CH/ AT per­ As a result of acquiring this "cultural habit spective argue that whatever their disagree­ of behavior," human beings begin to regulate ments, Leontiev (1981) readily acknowledges themselves "from the outside." This char­ the constitutive role of cultural mediation acteristic of human behavior gives rise to in his account of activity while Vygotsky the method of double stimulation. An early insisted on the importance of activity as the application of this method was to provide an context of mediated action (1997 ). In similar adult suffering from Parkinsonism with bits fashion, one sees contemporary scholars who of paper, by means of which he was able to are seen as somehow in opposition with each walk across a floor (Luria, 1932). It has subse­ other on this fundamenta~ point adopting quently been widely used in designing meh­ an "and/both" not an "either/or" approach. ods for re-mediating the behavior of adults So, for example, James Wertsch argues for with brain damage, or mentally retarded "mediated action in context" as a basic unit children (Amano, 1999; Luria, 1979). As we of analysis while Yrji::iEngestri::im argues that see below, it has become a central princi­ "the activity is the context" and ( as we shall ple guiding research on the development of see) pays great attention to principles of work practices among adults (Engestri::im, mediated action in both his theory and in his 2005). We will discuss double stimulation empirical research. While the presumably in more detail later in this chapter. MICHAEL COLE AND YRJO ENGESTROM 2. Activity as the essential unit of analysis. concepts imply the centrality of culture to The complementary basic premise of the human life. Culture is present in the form cultural-historical approach, adopted from of the tools, signs, rituals, and so on that Hegel by way of Marx, is that the analysis mediate human activity. It is simultaneously of human psychological functions must be present in all the symbolic forms that have situated in historically accumulated forms of accumulated over the social group's history, human activity. Unfortunately, the meaning whether that history is oflong or short dura­ of the term, activity, no less than the term tion. Lotman (1989) referred to this totality culture, is a bone of contention among schol­ of meaning making materials, the "semio­ ars from different disciplines and national sphere," which he defined as "the semiotic traditions. 2 According to A. N. Leontiev, space necessary for the existence and func­ tioning of languages." Human psychology is concerned with the In some forms of intervention, culture is activity of concreteindividuals, which takes treated as a locally emerging activity sys­ place either in a collective - that is, jointly tem involving a briefer stretch of history with other people - or in a situation in which the subject deals directly with the such as the participants at English football surrounding world of objects - for example, matches or in an afterschool club (Nocon, the potter's wheel or the writer's desk. [ . .. J 2004). In this latter case, the term "idiocul­ With all its varied forms, the human indi­ ture" is especially helpful. Adopting Gary vidual's activity is a system in the system Alan Fine's useful notion: of social relations. It does not exist without these relations. The specificform in which it An idioculture is a system of knowledge, exists is determined "bythe forms and means beliefs, behaviors, and customs shared "by of material and mental social interaction members of an interacting group to which (Verkher) that are created "by the devel­ members can refer and that serve as the opment of production and that cannot be basis of further interaction.
Recommended publications
  • Activity Theory and the Transformation of Pedagogic Practice

    Activity Theory and the Transformation of Pedagogic Practice

    Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook No.1, December, 2006, pp.77-90 Activity Theory and the Transformation of Pedagogic Practice YAMAZUMI, Katsuhiro* Today, work and other societal practices are experiencing accelerating paradigm shifts from mass-production-based systems toward new systems based on networking between organizations, collaboration, and partnerships. This shift requires new paradigms in the fields of education, learning, and develop- ment. As human activity quickly changes to networking and partnering among diverse cultural organizations, we need to ask ourselves whether schools and other actors are equipped to prepare people for such practices. We also need to think about what kind of learning can generate critical and creative agency among learners. Such agency will help people shape their own lives and future. In this paper, I discuss the potential offered by cultural-historical activity the- ory for analyzing and redesigning new, expanded pedagogic practices in schools. Putting the third generation of activity theory to pedagogic practice, I propose that new forms of expansive learning that are transforming pedagog- ic activity structures in schools can occur in advanced networks of learning that transcend institutional boundaries of schools, turning them into societal agents of change. To concretize the notion of expansive learning as one new form of pedagogy in which boundary-crossing networks of learning and the changing agent role of schools emerge, I will illustrate and analyze a children’s after-school activity project called New School: a multi-activity collaboration in which a university, an elementary school, families, and expert groups and community organizations outside the school cooperate to create advanced learning networks.
  • The Presence and Significance of Imaginative Play in the Lives of Mexican-American Adults

    The Presence and Significance of Imaginative Play in the Lives of Mexican-American Adults

    The Presence and Significance of Imaginative Play in the Lives of Mexican-American Adults BY ANTHONY T. PERONE III A.B., Cornell University, 1994 M.Ed., University of Illinois at Chicago, 2005 THESIS Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Psychology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Chicago, 2013 Chicago, Illinois Committee: Artin Göncü, Chair and Advisor Pamela Quiroz, Educational Policy Studies Stacey Horn William Schubert, Curriculum and Instruction Suzanne Gaskins, Northeastern University This dissertation is dedicated to communities who create and share playful, meaningful experiences. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation could not have been done without the support of so many people. First, I would like to thank those whose support of my research has brought me to this point. My advisor, chair, and mentor, Artin Göncü, has been instrumental and steadfast in supporting my initial interests in a cultural approach to imaginative play and education and in developing those elementary ideas into robust and engaging scholarship. It has been an honor to work with him over these years and I could not have imagined a more dedicated, nurturing, and compassionate advisor. I also thank my committee members Suzanne Gaskins, Stacey Horn, Pamela Quiroz, and William Schubert for their interest in my work, thoughtful comments, offers to help, and suggestions for growth that have made me and this dissertation better. In addition to my committee, other scholars have also been inspirational to my approaches to teaching, learning, and research. I am fortunate to have learned from Bill Ayers and his consistent reminder to learn the ―meaning for actors in situations,‖ guides the way I learn from the participants in my research.
  • Vygotskian and Post-Vygotskian Views on Children's Play •

    Vygotskian and Post-Vygotskian Views on Children's Play •

    Vygotskian and Post-Vygotskian Views on Children’s Play • E B D J. L e authors argue that childhood played a special role in the culturalhistorical theory of human culture and biosocial development made famous by Soviet psy- chologist Lev S. Vygotsky and his circle. ey discuss how this school of thought has, in turn, inuenced contemporary play studies. Vygotsky used early childhood to test and rene his basic principles. He considered the make-believe play of pre- schoolers and kindergartners the means by which they overcame the impulsiveness of toddlers to develop the intentional behavior essential to higher mental functions. e authors explore the theory of play developed by Vygotsky’s colleague Daniel Elkonin based on these basic principlies, as well as the implications for play in the work of such Vygotskians as Alexei Leontiv, Alexander Luria, and others, and how their work has been extended by more recent research. e authors also discuss the role of play in creating the Vygotsky school’s “zone of proximal development.” Like these researchers, old and new, the authors point to the need to teach young children how to play, but they caution teachers to allow play to remain a childhood activity instead of making it a lesson plan. Key words : childhood devlopment; culturalhistorical psychology; Lev S. Vygotsky; preschool play; zone of proximal development A -, - from Russian psychiatrist Lev S. Vygotsky states: “In play a child is always above his average age, above his daily behavior; in play it is as though he were a head taller than himself. As in the focus of a magnifying glass, play contains all developmental tendencies in a condensed form; in play it is as though the child were trying to jump above the level of his normal behavior” (1967, 16).
  • Nilsson, Ferholt & Lecusay, the Playing Exploring Child

    Nilsson, Ferholt & Lecusay, the Playing Exploring Child

    CIE0010.1177/1463949117710800Contemporary Issues in Early ChildhoodNilsson et al. 710800research-article2017 Article Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 1 –15 ‘The playing-exploring child’: © The Author(s) 2017 Reprints and permissions: Reconceptualizing the relationship sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949117710800DOI: 10.1177/1463949117710800 between play and learning in early journals.sagepub.com/home/cie childhood education Monica Nilsson Jönköping University, Sweden Beth Ferholt Brooklyn College, City University of New York, USA Robert Lecusay Jönköping University, Sweden Abstract In this article, the authors problematize the dichotomization of play and learning that often shapes the agenda of early childhood education research and practice. This dichotomization is driven in part by the tendency to define learning in terms of formal learning (i.e. learning as an outcome of direct instruction and school-based approaches that focus on teacher-led, goal-directed activities and declarative knowledge). The authors argue for a reconceptualization of early childhood education that understands learning and development not as an outcome, primarily, of instruction and teaching, but as an outcome of play and exploration. They develop this argument by drawing on Vygotsky’s theories of play, imagination, realistic thinking and creativity. These theories challenge another dichotomy – that between imagination and reality – by arguing that imagination is implicated in the meaning-making of both play and exploration. Instead of relating play to learning where play is characterized by imagination and learning by reality, the authors’ reconceptualization relates play to exploration and proposes that learning, defined as leading to human development, is an outcome of both of these activities.
  • Preschoolers' Private Speech and Motivation in Playful Versus Non

    Preschoolers' Private Speech and Motivation in Playful Versus Non

    Early Childhood Research Quarterly 38 (2017) 84–96 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Early Childhood Research Quarterly I think I can: Preschoolers’ private speech and motivation in playful versus non-playful contexts Jeremy Sawyer The Graduate Center of the City University of New York (CUNY), 365 5th Ave, New York, NY 10016, United States a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Vygotskian theory and empirical evidence suggest that children’s private speech and pretend play con- Received 17 January 2016 tribute to their development of motivational processes. Given current U.S. preschool expansion, and Received in revised form 1 September 2016 resurgent debates over the merits of play-based vs. non-play-based approaches to early childhood edu- Accepted 14 September 2016 cation, this study conducted an experimental investigation of the relative impact of these contexts on preschoolers’ private speech and mastery motivation (performance and persistence). 38 preschool chil- Keywords: dren engaged in a challenging fishing activity in two experimental conditions (playful and non-playful) Private speech simulating pedagogical and motivational (intrinsic vs. extrinsic) characteristics of common preschool Mastery motivation Play settings. Private speech was categorized as cognitive, motivational, metacognitive, playful or partially inter- nalized, and the emotional valence of private speech was marked as positive or negative. Results indicated Preschool education Vygotsky that preschoolers in the playful condition displayed higher mastery motivation than preschoolers in Intrinsic motivation the non-playful condition. Children in the playful condition used more frequent private speech, includ- Extrinsic motivation ing more frequent cognitive, playful, and positively valenced private speech.
  • Vygotsky`S Social Constructionist View on Disability: a Methodology

    Vygotsky`S Social Constructionist View on Disability: a Methodology

    Vygotsky`s Social Constructionist View on Disability: A Methodology for Inclusive Education Author: Katarina A. Rodina, PhD-Research Fellow, MSc. Speech and Language Pathology, Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1140 Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +47 22 85 81 38 Fax: + 47 22 85 80 21 1 A short summary This article analyses Vygotsky`s social constructionist view on disability and its practical implementation in contemporary inclusive education. The article focuses on the main concepts in Vygotsky`s theory on dysontogenesis (presented as a social constructionist view on disability), constituting the cultural-historical psychological basis for the Russian model in the contemporary inclusive preschool education. In this article a short presentation of methodological basis of special education in Russia will be given. The aim with the article is to cover following questions: 1) What is the core of the social constructionist understanding of learning and development in dysontogenesis? 2) How can we achieve an appropriate understanding of handicaps as a socio-cultural developmental phenomenon in accordance with Vygotsky`s social constructionist views on disability? 3) How may Vygotsky`s theory on dysontogenesis be implemented in contemporary inclusive classrooms? Keywords: Social constructionisme, Vygotsky, children with disabilities, inclusive education, Russia 2 Introduction The Russian educational psychologist and semioticist Lev Vygotsky (1896-1934) is first and foremost known in the West through his theories on the social origins of higher mental functions and semiotics. Vygotsky`s contribution to the methodology of psychological sciences as well as to psycholinguistic, developmental and cognitive psychology is well known in the United States as well as in Western Europe.
  • Learning-By-Expanding.Pdf

    Learning-By-Expanding.Pdf

    LEARNING BY EXPANDING AN ACTIVITY-THEORETICAL APPROACH TO DEVELOPMENTAL RESEARCH (1987). Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit. Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................23 PROBLEM ONE: THE FUTILITY OF LEARNING.....................................23 PROBLEM TWO: THE ELUSIVENESS OF EXPANSION..........................26 THEORETICAL RESEARCH AS EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ........................30 HOW TO PROCESS CATEGORIES OUT OF DATA ...............................40 HOW TO MAKE THE CATEGORIES REACH REALITY...........................47 SUMMING UP THE INTENTIONS .........................................................50 2. THE EMERGENCE OF LEARNING ACTIVITY AS A HISTORICAL FORM OF HUMAN LEARNING................................................................................52 AT THE LIMITS OF COGNITIVISM ......................................................52 ZINCHENKO'S CONTRIBUTION...........................................................56 THE TRIANGLES OF ACTIVITY ..........................................................59 The First Lineage: From Peirce to Popper........................................62 The Second Lineage: From Mead to Trevarthen ..............................70 The Third Lineage: From Vygotsky to Leont'ev ..............................77 THE EVOLUTION OF ACTIVITY..........................................................91 INNER CONTRADICTIONS OF HUMAN ACTIVITY................................98 ON THE CULTURAL EVOLUTION OF HUMAN LEARNING..................106 The first
  • Chapter 3. Active Social Symbolic Selves: Vygotskian Traditions

    Chapter 3. Active Social Symbolic Selves: Vygotskian Traditions

    CHAPTER 3 ACTIVE SOCIAL SYMBOLIC SELVES: VYGOTSKIAN TRADITIONS Vygotsky’s fertile starting place for understanding the formation of individual conscious within social activities mediated by the culturally available tools gave rise in Russia to two direct lines of work of rather different character, developing different potentials within Vygotsky’s work. One associated with his student and collaborator A. N. Leont’ev elaborated the idea of individual and group activity. The other associated with his other major student and collaborator A. R. Luria pursued the development of individual consciousness within the interaction of neurobiology, language development, and functional production of behavior. Each of these traditions brings an important perspective to issues of writing though neither addresses writing as directly as Vygotsky did. Though Leont’ev does not consider writing or even language much, beyond his recognition that language mediates activities and provides a vehicle for social learning, his work extends and elaborates the notion of activity and its relation to larger systems of social organization. His framework, particularly as elaborated by Engeström, helps us articulate the ways in which writing dynamically mediates communally organized activities. Though Luria specifically focuses on spoken language, he provides ways of thinking about the interaction of language and brain within dynamic activity that have consequences for literate production and reception— writing and reading. Luria’s work suggests the deepest mechanisms by which we absorb and use language—mechanisms which have continuing currency within cognitive neuroscience, a field he is recognized as pioneering. These mechanisms have consequences for how we look on our own language formation and interpretation processes, including writing and reading, and therefore how we reflexively manage them.
  • Historical Activity Theory: “Collectividual” Dialectics from a Transformative Activist Stance

    Historical Activity Theory: “Collectividual” Dialectics from a Transformative Activist Stance

    OUTLINES - CRITICAL PRACTICE STUDIES • Vol. 14, No. 2 • 2013 • (07-28) • http://www.outlines.dk The Challenge of Individuality in Cultural- Historical Activity Theory: “Collectividual” Dialectics from a Transformative Activist Stance Anna Stetsenko The Graduate Center of the City University of New York USA Abstract In addressing the persistent challenge of fully integrating individual dimensions and human subjectivity within the cultural-historical activity theory, this paper suggests several steps to revise its core onto-epistemology in an expansive approach termed the transformative activist stance. This approach outlines the subtle dialectics of individual and collective planes of human praxis whereby each individual is shaped by collective history and collaborative practices while at the same time shaping and real-izing them through contributing to their collective, dynamic materiality in moving beyond the status quo. In capitalizing on people always transcending what exists in ‘the here and now,’ in a non-adaptive fashion, based in a commitment and vision to how the world “ought to be,” the individual subjectivity is reclaimed as itself a fully social, embodied, material-discursive process. Individual subjectivity and agency gain status through contributing to changes in “collectividual” practices as the primary onto-epistemology of a unitary realm that is individual and social/collective at the same time. Introduction Cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT) is currently enjoying much popularity and success in a variety of fields
  • Descriptive and Design Studies of Consequential Learning in Conceptual Practices

    Descriptive and Design Studies of Consequential Learning in Conceptual Practices

    Educational Psychologist ISSN: 0046-1520 (Print) 1532-6985 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/hedp20 Changing Concepts in Activity: Descriptive and Design Studies of Consequential Learning in Conceptual Practices Rogers Hall & A. Susan Jurow To cite this article: Rogers Hall & A. Susan Jurow (2015) Changing Concepts in Activity: Descriptive and Design Studies of Consequential Learning in Conceptual Practices, Educational Psychologist, 50:3, 173-189, DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2015.1075403 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1075403 Published online: 29 Sep 2015. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 2 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=hedp20 Download by: [VUL Vanderbilt University] Date: 30 September 2015, At: 13:03 EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 50(3), 173–189, 2015 Copyright Ó Division 15, American Psychological Association ISSN: 0046-1520 print / 1532-6985 online DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2015.1075403 Changing Concepts in Activity: Descriptive and Design Studies of Consequential Learning in Conceptual Practices Rogers Hall Department of Teaching and Learning Vanderbilt University A. Susan Jurow School of Education University of Colorado, Boulder Concepts and conceptual change have been studied extensively as phenomena of individual thinking and action, but changing circumstances of social or cultural groups using concepts are treated as external conditions. We describe research on consequential learning in conceptual practices, where concepts include representational infrastructure that coordinates meaning and activity across time, setting, and social participation. Consequential learning changes one’s relation to conceptual practice, creating access to and valued possibilities for participation in practices at a broader scale.
  • Early Childhood Teachers' Beliefs and Practices Related to Peer Learning

    Early Childhood Teachers' Beliefs and Practices Related to Peer Learning

    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Early childhood teachers’ beliefs and practices related to peer learning: a mixed methods study A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education at Massey University, Manawatū, New Zealand Penelope Jean Smith 2018 Abstract This study investigated New Zealand early childhood teachers’ beliefs and practices related to peer learning, as little is known about how teachers support peer learning in play based settings. A mixed methods exploratory sequential research design was used. The first phase of the study consisted of case studies, which comprised interviews and observations of teachers in three early childhood centres. Filmed observations of teachers’ practices as they supported opportunities for peer learning were undertaken. Stimulated recall interviews were then completed to gain a deeper understanding of teachers’ intentions about this aspect of their practice. Constant comparative analysis was used to analyse the case studies, including the use of the NVivo programme for content analysis. The second phase of the study was a nationwide survey sent to early childhood teachers. The questions for the survey were derived from analyses of the case studies and extant literature. Survey data was interpreted using descriptive statistics and coding of open ended questions. Findings from both phases were used to answer the research questions. The study revealed teachers’ beliefs about peer learning recognised the social, participatory nature of learning, alongside provision of opportunities for individual exploration and discovery.
  • Human Motivation in Question: Discussing Emotions, Motives, and Subjectivity from a Cultural-Historical Standpoint

    Human Motivation in Question: Discussing Emotions, Motives, and Subjectivity from a Cultural-Historical Standpoint

    Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour ••:•• DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.12073 Human Motivation in Question: Discussing Emotions, Motives, and Subjectivity from a Cultural-Historical Standpoint FERNANDO LUIS GONZÁLEZ REY ABSTRACT Vygotsky, at the end of his life, advanced a new representation of a psychological system that was ruled by a cognitive-emotional unity, a theorization that remains inconclusive due to Vygotsky’s early death. This article discusses the advances made by Vygotsky in the comprehension of human motivation through his concepts of sense and perezhivanie at the end of his work. Through these concepts, he further advanced the discussion of motivation, despite the fact that these concepts have only very recently been considered a relevant part of his legacy in both Russian and Western psychology. This paper discusses the departure from and the historical presentations of the concept of motive in the following two main approaches of Soviet psychology that were mistakenly equated in Western inter- pretations: Vygotsky’s approach, mainly at the first as last moment of his work, and Leontiev’s Activity Theory. Based on the final theoretical positions of Vygotsky and of other Soviet authors, and further developing this legacy, this article proposes a new definition of motivation as a specific quality of subjectively configured systems and defines motive as intrinsic to the functioning of all psycho- logical function defines subjective functions as subjectively configured processes. This new proposal of human motivation within a new way of defining subjectivity defines new categories as subjective senses and subjective configurations on which the author bases a specific approach for advancing the topic of subjectivity and motivation within a cultural-historical framework.