DOCSLIB.ORG

Arm3 Fourth Quarter Report ______

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arm3 Fourth Quarter Report ______ ARM3 FOURTH QUARTER REPORT _________________________________________________________________ FISCAL YEAR 2012 – QUARTER 4 JULY 1 – SEPT 30, 2012 Participants in Abomey during the IMCI training . October 30, 2012 This report was produced for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) by Medical Care Development International (MCDI). ARM3 Accelerating the Reduction of Malaria Morbidity and Mortality Program Fourth Quarter Report July 1, 2012 to September 30, 2012 Fiscal Year 2012 Submitted to: Dr. Emile Bongo, USAID Agreement Officer Representative (AOR), USAID/Benin Dr. Milton Amayun, Family Health Team Leader, USAID/Benin Ms. Anne Busaka, Senior Acquisition and Assistance Specialist, USAID/Benin ARM3, Accelerating the Reduction of Malaria Morbidity and Mortality Program (ARM3), is funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), under Cooperative Agreement AID-680-A-11-00001. ARM3 is managed by Medical Care Development International (MCDI) as the prime, in collaboration with sub-grantees Africare, Johns – Hopkins University – Center for Communications Project (JHU-CCP) and Management Sciences for Health (MSH). The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or of the United States Government. Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Table of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 6 Start-up Activities (continued) ....................................................................................................................... 6 Achievements ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Result 1: Implementation of malaria prevention interventions in support of the National Malaria Strategy improved........................................................................................................................................................ 8 Sub-Result 1.1: IPTp Uptake Increased ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Achievements ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Results .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Sub-Result 1.2: Supply and Use of LLINs Increased ..................................................................................................................... 9 Achievements ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Results ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Result 2: Malaria diagnosis and treatment activities in support of the National Malaria Strategy improved 11 Sub-Result 2.1: Diagnostic Capacity and Use of Testing Improved ............................................................................................. 11 Achievements ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Results ................................................................................................................................................ 13 Sub-Result 2.2: Case Management of Uncomplicated and Severe Malaria Improved ................................................................. 13 Achievements ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Results ................................................................................................................................................ 16 Result 3: The national health system’s capacity to deliver and manage quality malaria treatment and control interventions strengthened. ............................................................................................................. 17 Sub-Result 3.1: MOH/NMCP Capacity to Deliver and Manage Quality Malaria Treatment and Control Interventions Improved .. 17 Achievements ...................................................................................................................................... 17 Results ................................................................................................................................................ 18 Sub-Result 3.2: Capacity to Collect, Manage and Use Malaria Health Information for M&E and Surveillance Improved .............. 19 Achievements ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Results ................................................................................................................................................ 22 Sub-Result 3.3: Capacity in Commodities and Supply Chain Management Improved ................................................................. 22 Achievements ...................................................................................................................................... 23 Cross Sectional Activities ............................................................................................................................ 26 Behavior Change Communication (BCC) .................................................................................................................................... 26 Achievements ...................................................................................................................................... 26 Performance Improvement Approach .......................................................................................................................................... 28 Achievements ...................................................................................................................................... 28 Program Management ................................................................................................................................ 30 Home Office Backstopping and Reporting................................................................................................................................... 30 Achievements ...................................................................................................................................... 30 Major Challenges (per ARM3 sub-result): ................................................................................................... 31 Major Activities Planned for next quarter (Oct– Dec): ................................................................................. 32 Financial Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 34 Annex 1: OTSS Data – Round 9 (Group D Baseline) vs. Round 8 (Comparison Groups A, B, and C) ..... 35 ANNEX 2: SUMMARY OF PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE APRIL 2012 END-USE VERIFICATION SURVEY...................................................................................................................................................... 47 ANNEX 3: MINI CARAVAN QUOTES ........................................................................................................ 54 Annex 4: ARM3 Quarterly Financial Report (July through September 2012), Reporting from Inception (October 3, 2011) through September 30, 2012 – Cumulative ................................................................... 56 Annex 5: ARM3 Quarterly Financial Report (July through September) Reporting from July 1 through September 30, 2012 – Non Cumulative ...................................................................................................... 57 Table of Acronyms AAA/3A Akpro Misserte – Avrankou – Adjarra ABC Analysis of stock value, turnover, and volume ABD Adjohoun – Bonou -- Dangbo ABFC Association Béninoise de Femmes Chanteuses ACPB Association des Cliniques Privées du Bénin ACT Artemisinin Combination Therapy AIRS Abt’s Indoor Residual Spraying Program AL Artemether + Lumefantrin AMCES Association des Œuvres Médicales Privées Confessionnelles et Sociales ANC Antenatal Clinic AOR Agreement Officer Representative ARM3 Accelerating the Reduction of Malaria Morbidity and Mortality Program (ARM3) BASICS Basic Support for Institutionalizing Child Survival BCC Behavioral Change Communication BDHS Benin Demographic and Health Survey CAFE Stock Management Software Company CAME Centrale d’Achat des Médicaments Essentiels (Central Medical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identification of Critical Versus Robust Processing Unit Operations
    International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2021, 56, 1311–1321 1311 Original article Identification of critical versus robust processing unit operations determining the physical and biochemical properties of cassava- based semolina (gari) Andres´ Escobar,1,2* Eric Rondet,2 Layal Dahdouh,2,3 Julien Ricci,2,3 Noel¨ Akissoe,´ 4 Dominique Dufour,2,3 Thierry Tran,1,2,3 Bernard Cuq5 & Michele` Delalonde2 1 The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), CGIAR Research Program on Roots Tubers and Bananas (RTB), Apartado Aereo´ 6713, Cali, Colombia 2 Qualisud, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, SupAgro, University of Avignon, University of La Reunion,´ 73 rue JF Breton, Montpellier 34398, France 3 CIRAD, UMR Qualisud, F-34398, Montpellier, France 4 Faculty of Agronomical Sciences, University of Abomey Calavi, Cotonou, Benin 5 UMR IATE, CIRAD, INRA, University of Montpellier, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France (Received 3 August 2020; Accepted in revised form 13 October 2020) Summary The gari-making process involves several unit operations (U.O.), some of which strongly influence the quality of the end product. Two contrasting process scales (laboratory-scale vs conventional) were com- pared in order to identify which U.O. were affected by the change of scale. U.O. that changed end-pro- duct characteristics depending on process scale were deemed critical; whereas U.O. that resulted in similar characteristics were deemed robust. The classification depended on quality attributes considered: rasping and roasting were critical for physical properties, in particular particle size which ranged from 0.44 to 0.89 mm between the two process scales; and robust for biochemical properties.
    [Show full text]
  • GIEWS Country Brief Benin
    GIEWS Country Brief Benin Reference Date: 23-April-2020 FOOD SECURITY SNAPSHOT Planting of 2020 main season maize ongoing in south under normal moisture conditions Above-average 2019 cereal crop harvested Prices of coarse grains overall stable in March Pockets of food insecurity persist Start of 2020 cropping season in south follows timely onset of rains Following the timely onset of seasonal rains in the south, planting of yams was completed in March, while planting of the main season maize crop is ongoing and will be completed by the end of April. The harvest of yams is expected to start in July, while harvesting operations of maize will start in August. Planting of rice crops, to be harvested from August, is underway. The cumulative rainfall amounts since early March have been average to above average in most planted areas and supported the development of yams and maize crops, which are at sprouting, seedling and tillering stages. Weeding activities are normally taking place in most cropped areas. In the north, seasonal dry weather conditions are still prevailing and planting operations for millet and sorghum, to be harvested from October, are expected to begin in May-June with the onset of the rains. In April, despite the ongoing pastoral lean season, forage availability was overall satisfactory in the main grazing areas of the country. The seasonal movement of domestic livestock, returning from the south to the north, started in early March following the normal onset of the rains in the south. The animal health situation is generally good and stable, with just some localized outbreaks of seasonal diseases, including Trypanosomiasis and Contagious Bovine Peripneumonia.
    [Show full text]
  • MCA-Benin's ‘Access to Land’ Project and Its Aftermath
    BENIN INSTITUTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC WP19/BID08 CHAPTER 7: HISTORY AND POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LAND ADMINISTRATION REFORM IN BENIN Philippe Lavigne Delville French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development, With discussion by Kenneth Houngbedji Paris School of Economics August 2019 History and Political Economy of Land Administration Reform in Benin Table of contents Acronyms ii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Land reforms in Africa, between the privatisation paradigm and the adaptation paradigm 1 1.2 Understanding the political economy of an ongoing reform: a process-tracing approach 4 2 State ownership, informality, semi-formal arrangements and ‘confusion management’: a brief analysis of the land sector in the early 2000s 6 2.1 Institutional weaknesses and semi-formal arrangements 6 2.2 Land governance, between neo-customary regulations, the market, and semi- formal systems 10 2.3 ‘Managing confusion’ 13 2.4 Institutional bottlenecks before reforms: a tentative synthesis 15 3 The search for overall/sectorial adjustment in the land sector in the years 1990– 2000: a telescoping of reforms 16 3.1 The emergence of the land issue in the 1990s 16 3.2 In urban areas, tax experiments and unsuccessful discussions on legal reform 16 3.3 In rural areas, the PFRs and the draft rural land law: the construction of an alternative to land title 17 3.4 In the mid-2000s: the MCA-Benin and the emergence of a global reform project 20 4 Extend access to land title through a deep reform of land administration: MCA- Benin's ‘Access to Land’ project and its aftermath
    [Show full text]
  • The Gold Standard Micro-Programme Activity Design Document Template (Vpa-Dd)
    TITLE OF THE MICRO-PROGRAMME: GS2489 Efficient cookstoves in Benin and Togo ANNEX AO – THE GOLD STANDARD MICRO-PROGRAMME ACTIVITY DESIGN DOCUMENT TEMPLATE (VPA-DD) CONTENTS A. General description of micro-programme activity (VPA) B. Eligibility of VPA and Estimation of Emission Reductions C. Stakeholder comments Annexes Annex 1: Contact information on entity/individual responsible for the VPA Annex 2: Information regarding public funding This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font. 1 TITLE OF THE MICRO-PROGRAMME: GS2489 Efficient cookstoves in Benin and Togo SECTION A. General description of micro-programme activity (VPA) A.1. Title of the micro-scale VPA: Title: GS2489 Efficient cookstoves in Benin and Togo – VPA2 – EcoBenin – Wanrou efficient cookstoves in Atacora/Donga region GS nr: GS6008 Date: 28/08/2017 Version: 01 A.2. Description of the micro-scale VPA: >> The departments of Atacora / Donga, are suffering from severe deforestation due to the rapid increase of its population and their energy needs. 91% of the households in the Atacora/Donga departments use fuelwood as main combustion fuel.1 According to the document SCRP -Benin 2011- 20152, 69% of the population of this region is considered as poor. In this region, the cooking of meals is done on traditional three stones coosktoves, which have a very low energy efficiency. The new project "Promotion of the Wanrou efficient cookstove in the region of Atacora/Donga (ProWAD)”3 4 is included as VPA-2 in the program of activities (PoA) GS2489 "Efficient cookstoves in Benin and Togo" and is implemented by EcoBenin.
    [Show full text]
  • Read More About SDG Bond Framework
    1 C1 - Public Natixis Summary FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................................... 3 ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................... 4 PART I: Benin mobilised for the 2030 Agenda ....................................................................................... 5 1. The basics about the Republic of Benin .......................................................................................... 5 1.1 Political and administrative organisation of Benin ..................................................................... 6 1.2 A predominately young and rural population ............................................................................. 6 1.3 Human development indicators are improving .......................................................................... 8 1.4 Benin’s economic structure ........................................................................................................ 8 1.5 The authorities’ response to the Covid-19 pandemic ................................................................ 9 2. Actions and policies closely anchored to the 2030 Agenda .......................................................... 11 2.1 Actions for taking ownership of the 2030 Agenda ................................................................... 11 2.2 Mobilising institutions and transforming public action to reach the SDGs ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis of Diversity and Utilization of Edible Plants in Arid and Semi-Arid Areas in Benin Alcade C Segnon* and Enoch G Achigan-Dako
    Segnon and Achigan-Dako Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2014, 10:80 http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/10/1/80 JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY AND ETHNOMEDICINE RESEARCH Open Access Comparative analysis of diversity and utilization of edible plants in arid and semi-arid areas in Benin Alcade C Segnon* and Enoch G Achigan-Dako Abstract Background: Agrobiodiversity is said to contribute to the sustainability of agricultural systems and food security. However, how this is achieved especially in smallholder farming systems in arid and semi-arid areas is rarely documented. In this study, we explored two contrasting regions in Benin to investigate how agroecological and socioeconomic contexts shape the diversity and utilization of edible plants in these regions. Methods: Data were collected through focus group discussions in 12 villages with four in Bassila (semi-arid Sudano-Guinean region) and eight in Boukoumbé (arid Sudanian region). Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 180 farmers (90 in each region). Species richness and Shannon-Wiener diversity index were estimated based on presence-absence data obtained from the focus group discussions using species accumulation curves. Results: Our results indicated that 115 species belonging to 48 families and 92 genera were used to address food security. Overall, wild species represent 61% of edible plants collected (60% in the semi-arid area and 54% in the arid area). About 25% of wild edible plants were under domestication. Edible species richness and diversity in the semi-arid area were significantly higher than in the arid area. However, farmers in the arid area have developed advanced resource-conserving practices compared to their counterparts in the semi-arid area where slash-and-burn cultivation is still ongoing, resulting in natural resources degradation and loss of biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Budget Justification 2015
    U.S. AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION Pathways to Prosperity “Making Africa’s Growth Story Real in Grassroots Communities” CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION Fiscal Year 2015 March 31, 2014 Washington, D.C. United States African Development Foundation (This page was intentionally left blank) 2 USADF 2015 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION United States African Development Foundation THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION WASHINGTON, DC We are pleased to present to the Congress the Administration’s FY 2015 budget justification for the United States African Development Foundation (USADF). The FY 2015 request of $24 million will provide resources to establish new grants in 15 African countries and to support an active portfolio of 350 grants to producer groups engaged in community-based enterprises. USADF is a Federally-funded, public corporation promoting economic development among marginalized populations in Sub-Saharan Africa. USADF impacts 1,500,000 people each year in underserved communities across Africa. Its innovative direct grants program (less than $250,000 per grant) supports sustainable African-originated business solutions that improve food security, generate jobs, and increase family incomes. In addition to making an economic impact in rural populations, USADF’s programs are at the forefront of creating a network of in-country technical service providers with local expertise critical to advancing Africa’s long-term development needs. USADF furthers U.S. priorities by directing small amounts of development resources to disenfranchised groups in hard to reach, sensitive regions across Africa. USADF ensures that critical U.S. development initiatives such as Ending Extreme Poverty, Feed the Future, Power Africa, and the Young African Leaders Initiative reach out to those communities often left out of Africa’s growth story.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Genetic Susceptibility to the Metabolic Syndrome by the CAPN10 SNP19 Gene in the Population of South Benin
    International Journal of Molecular Biology: Open Access Research Article Open Access Evaluation of the genetic susceptibility to the metabolic syndrome by the CAPN10 SNP19 gene in the population of South Benin Abstract Volume 4 Issue 6 - 2019 Metabolic syndrome is a multifactorial disorder whose etiology is resulting from the Nicodème Worou Chabi,1,2 Basile G interaction between genetic and environmental factors. Calpain 10 (CAPN10) is the first Sognigbé,1 Esther Duéguénon,1 Véronique BT gene associated with type 2 diabetes that has been identified by positional cloning with 1 1 sequencing method. This gene codes for cysteine ​​protease; ubiquitously expressed in all Tinéponanti, Arnaud N Kohonou, Victorien 2 1 tissues, it is involved in the fundamental physiopathological aspects of insulin resistance T Dougnon, Lamine Baba Moussa and insulin secretion of type 2 diabetes. The goal of this study was to evaluate the genetic 1Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of susceptibility to the metabolic syndrome by the CAPN10 gene in the population of southern Abomey-Calavi, Benin 2 Benin. This study involved apparently healthy individuals’ aged 18 to 80 in four ethnic Laboratory of Research in Applied Biology, Polytechnic School of Abomey-Calavi, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin groups in southern Benin. It included 74 subjects with metabolic syndrome and 323 non- metabolic syndrome patients who served as controls, with 222 women versus 175 men Correspondence: Nicodème Worou Chabi, Laboratory with an average age of 40.58 ± 14.03 years old. All subjects were genotyped for the SNP of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of 19 polymorphism of the CAPN10 gene with the PCR method in order to find associations Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science and between this polymorphism and the metabolic syndrome.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution and Risks Factors of Porcine Cysticercosis in Southern Benin Based Meat Inspection Records
    International Research Journal of Microbiology (IRJM) (ISSN: 2141-5463) Vol. 4(8) pp. 188-196, September, 2013 DOI: http:/dx.doi.org/10.14303/irjm.2013.043 Available online http://www.interesjournals.org/IRJM Copyright © 2013 International Research Journals Full Length Research Paper Spatial distribution and risks factors of porcine cysticercosis in southern Benin based meat inspection records Judicaël S. E. Goussanou ab* , T. Marc Kpodekon ab , Claude Saegerman c, Eric Azagoun a, A. K. Issaka Youssao a, Souaïbou Farougou a, Nicolas Praet d, Sarah Gabriël d., Pierre Dorny d, Nicolas Korsak e aDepartment of animal Production and Heath, Ecole Polytechnique of Abomey-Calavi, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin bLaboratory of Applied Biology, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin cDepartment of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Research Unit of Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Applied to Veterinary Sciences (UREAR-ULg), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium dDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium eFood Sciences Department, Faculty of veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] : Tel: 0022995700449/ 0022997168992 Abstract Porcine cysticercosis, which is widely distributed in Africa, causes financial losses and diseases among humans. To control the disease in an area, it is important to know the geographical distribution. In this study, spatial distribution of porcine cysticercosis in southern Benin was performed. By using the number of partial organ seizures at meat inspection, the study has revealed high risks of porcine cysticercosis in administrative districts of Aplahoue, Dogbo, Klouekanme and Lokossa. The proportion of seizures ranged from 0.06% for neck muscles to 0.69% for tongues.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance, Marketing and Innovations in Beninese Pineapple Supply Chains
    Governance, marketing and innovations in Beninese pineapple supply chains A survey of smallholder farmers in South Benin Djalalou-Dine Ademonla A. Arinloye Thesis committee Promotors Prof. Dr S.W.F. Omta Professor of Management Studies, Wageningen University Prof. Dr Ir M.A.J.S. van Boekel Professor of Food Quality and Design, Wageningen University Co-promotors Dr J.L.F. Hagelaar Assistant Professor, Management Studies Group, Wageningen University Dr Ir A.R. Linnemann Assistant Professor, Food Quality and Design, Wageningen University Other members Prof. Dr R. Ruben, Radboud University Nijmegen Prof. Dr ir C. Leeuwis, Wageningen University Prof. Dr X. Gellinck, Ghent University, Belgium Dr D. Hounkonnou, Connecting Development Partners (CDP) International, Benin This research was conducted under the auspices of the Wageningen School of Social Sciences (WASS) and the Graduate School VLAG (Advanced studies in Food Technology, Agrobiotechnology, Nutrition and Health Sciences) Governance, marketing and innovations in Beninese pineapple supply chains A survey of smallholder farmers in South Benin Djalalou-Dine Ademonla A. Arinloye Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Thursday 25 April 2013 at 11 a.m. in the Aula. Djalalou-Dine Ademonla A. Arinloye Governance, marketing and innovations in Beninese pineapple supply chains, 194 pages. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL (2013) With references, with summaries in English and Dutch ISBN: 978-94-6173-534-8 Acknowledgements This thesis represents a continuation of my engagement with empirical research I performed at the Agricultural Policy Analysis Unit of the National Agriculture Research Institute of Benin (PAPA/INRAB) and the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA).
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Molecular Markers in Participatory Plant Breeding: Assessing the Genetic Variability in Cotton Populations Bred by Farmers J
    Annals of Applied Biology ISSN 0003-4746 RESEARCH ARTICLE Use of molecular markers in participatory plant breeding: assessing the genetic variability in cotton populations bred by farmers J. Lancxon1,2, J.-P. Pichaut1, M. Djaboutou2, S. Lewicki-Dhainaut1,2, C. Viot1 & J.-M. Lacape1 1 CIRAD, Centre de Coope´ ration Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le De´ veloppement, 34398, Montpellier Cedex 5, France 2 INRAB, Institut National de Recherches Agricoles du Be´ nin, CRA Coton et Fibres, 01 BP715, Cotonou, Be´ nin Keywords Abstract AFLP and SSR markers; decentralised breeding; mass selection. In participatory plant breeding, farmers are involved in simple selection schemes that are not suitable for assessing genetic variability in the segregating populations. Correspondence We propose to use information derived from molecular marker analyses to help J.-M. Lacape, Centre Coope´ ration Internatio- monitoring such populations. In this study, we used three indicators to compare nale en Recherche Agronomique pour le genetic variability in eight genetic structures, that is three plant populations De´ veloppement, Avenue Agropolis, BP 5035, selected by farmers over five generations, three nonselected populations and 34032 Montpellier Cedex, France. two commercial varieties. The three indicators were the polymorphic locus rate, Email: [email protected] heterozygosity rate and dissimilarity index. The results highlighted that the genetic Received: 7 April 2007; revised version variability decreased more with farmers’ selection than with environmental fac- accepted: 29 September 2007. tors. The breeding process was not complete because genetic variability in the selected populations was midway between that of the nonselected populations doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00197.x and that of the commercial varieties monitored.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Benin in 2015
    2015 Minerals Yearbook BENIN [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior September 2018 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Benin By James J. Barry Mining in Benin did not play a significant role in the country’s Loumbou-Loumbou deposit had estimated reserves of 226 Mt economy. Benin produced mostly industrial minerals, which and the Madekali deposit had estimated reserves of 240 Mt. included cement, clay, limestone, marble, and sand and gravel. Both deposits were estimated to have grades of 46% to 52% Cassiterite, colored gemstones (tourmaline and aquamarine), iron and 13% to 15% silica (Minergy Resources Ltd., 2010; gold, and tantalum ore have been produced in small quantities Bénin Sous Sol, 2015). by artisanal miners. Mining was regulated by law No. 2006–17, Tantalum.—In July, G&B African Resources Benin SARL, and oil and gas regulations were contained in law No. 2006–18 which was a 100%-owned subsidiary of Premier African (Thomas, 2013; Van Wyngaardt, 2015). Minerals Ltd. of the British Virgin Islands, was awarded an Real GDP growth in 2015 was 5.2% compared with 6.5% in exploration permit located 75 kilometers south of Parakou in 2014. Benin’s economic growth relied heavily on trade with Collines Department in central Benin. Tantalite and gemstones Nigeria. As such, the 48% decrease in bonny light crude oil had been mined for more than a decade in the area by artisanal prices from 2014 to 2015 had a negative effect on the Nigerian miners. Premier had identified mineralized tantalum pegmatites economy and resulted in an 18% decrease in the value of goods and discovered new gem-quality aquamarine (Regulatory News and services that Benin exported to Nigeria.
    [Show full text]