DOCSLIB.ORG

'It's About Implementation'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'It's About Implementation' ‘It’s about implementation’ EU democracy promotion in Armenia and its influence on electoral policies Masterthesis: ‘It’s about implementation’: EU democracy promotion in Armenia and its influence on electoral policies Jurriaan van Hellemond: s4351339 December 2014 MSc Human Geography Europe: Borders, Identity and Governance Nijmegen, The Netherlands Supervisor: Dr. Olivier Kramsch Second reader: Dr. Martin van der Velde II Acknowledgments An interest in the borders of the EU and a focus on Eastern Europe — those were the starting concepts of this thesis. A research process of 15 months during which I’ve moved abroad, learned a lot about myself and the world around me, and visited places I would never thought of going to at the start of my academic career back in 2008. I would first like to thank my supervisor Mr. Kramsch (Olivier) who has been supportive of my decision to jump into this unusual research topic; reviewing the borders of the EU and its subsequent external governance. Through his strict office hours system he made me visit Nijmegen on a regular basis which, lacking an OV-jaarkaart, was quite a hassle. However, the meeting we had were always productive and helped me a lot in the completion of this thesis. I would also like to thank Mr. Van der Velde who answered practical question in regards to my internship and who acts as a second reader for this thesis. I want to thank all the members of my internship organization in Armenia, ICHD, who supported me in my research efforts, provided me with a friendly and productive working environment and were available at any moment to answer questions surrounding my thesis. I would also like to thank the consulted experts within this thesis for their willingness to participate and appreciate their provided knowledge and expertise. My time in Armenia wouldn’t have been the same without my amazing roommates at ‘Bakunts House.’ Laura and Leslie, you made me instantly feel at home in Armenia and helped me to integrate into Yerevan’s social life at a record-breaking pace. I will never forget the interesting ScREenery events and the amazing khorovatzes organized at the house. I also appreciate the support I received from my Dutch roommates of the ‘LN6’ who urged me to make the daily trips towards the library or ‘UBB’ and would join me on regular ‘brainstorming’ lunch and coffee breaks; lifting spirits up. Last but not least I want to thank my parents Suzanne Davids and Guus van Hellemond who have always been 100% supportive of my decisions and subsequent stay in Armenia. You were always ready to provide advice and feedback on my research and have supported me tremendously in the subsequent career decisions I am currently pursuing. III List of Abbreviations AA—Association Agreement HR — Human Rights ANC — Armenian National Congress ICHD — International Center for Human Development ALDE —Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe IFES — International Foundation for Electoral Systems AP—Action Plan IGO — International governmental CAQDAS – Computer Assisted Qualitative organization Data Analysis Software NGO — Non-governmental organization CEC — Central Electoral Commission NIP—National Indicative Program CGPEM—Code of Good Practices in Electoral Matters ODIHR—Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights CoE — Council of Europe OSCE – Organization for Security and CU—Custom Union Cooperation in Europa DCFTA—Deep and Comprehensive Free OSF/OSI — Open Society Foundation Trade Agreement PACE—Parliamentary Assembly of the EaP—Eastern Partnership Council of Europe EEAS—European External Action Service PCA—Partnership and Cooperation Agreement EEG—European external governance PEC — Precinct Electoral Commission ENC—European Neighborhood Countries RA—Republic of Armenia ENP — European Neighborhood Policy RSC — Regional Studies Center ENPI—European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument TEC— Territorial Electoral Commission EOM—Electoral Observation Mission TI — Transparency International EP—European Parliament UN — United Nations EU — European Union USA—United States of America EPP — Europeans People Party USSR—Union of Soviet Socialist Republics EUFoA—European Friends of Armenia VC—Venice Commission GO’s — Governmental Organizations YSU—Yerevan State University IV Table of Content Acknowledgments ..............................................................................................................................III List of Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................... IV 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1 1.1 EU: the ENP and the EaP ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Armenia ................................................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Research goals and questions ............................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Relevance .............................................................................................................................................. 6 1.4.1 Scientific relevance ........................................................................................................................ 6 1.4.2 Societal relevance .......................................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Structure ............................................................................................................................................... 7 2. Theoretical framework .....................................................................................................................9 2.1 Europeanization .................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1.1 Europeanization, a paradigm ......................................................................................................... 9 2.1.2 Realism and rationalism ............................................................................................................... 11 2.1.3 Constructivism ............................................................................................................................. 12 2.2 Modes of external governance ........................................................................................................... 13 2.2.1 Hierarchical governance .............................................................................................................. 15 2.2.2 Network Governance ................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.3 Market Governance ..................................................................................................................... 16 2.3 Policy transfer and convergence ......................................................................................................... 17 2.4 The normative power of the EU and democracy promotion .............................................................. 20 2.5 External governance within the ENP and EaP ..................................................................................... 22 2.6 Russia’s role in the Eastern Neighbourhood ....................................................................................... 24 2.7 Conclusion: Armenia within the ENP .................................................................................................. 25 3. Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 27 3.1 Research methods ............................................................................................................................... 27 3.2 Operationalization of concepts ........................................................................................................... 28 3.2.1 Armenian electoral policies ......................................................................................................... 28 3.2.2 Domestic impact: ENP/EaP influence .......................................................................................... 29 3.2.3 Domestic impact: Other (external) parties .................................................................................. 30 3.3 Data collection .................................................................................................................................... 31 3.3.1 Content analysis ........................................................................................................................... 31 3.3.2 Interviews ..................................................................................................................................... 31 3.4 Data analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 34 V 3.4.1 Content analysis ........................................................................................................................... 34 3.4.2 Interviews ........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of the Armenian Delegation Participating in the 14Th EU-Armenia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee Meeting
    List of the Armenian Delegation participating in the 14th EU-Armenia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee meeting 5-6 February 2014 Strasbourg MEMBERS Last Name First Name Factions Mr Samvel FARMANYAN "Republican" (RPA) (Head) Mr Vahram BAGHDASARYAN "Republican" (RPA) Mr Karen BOTOYAN "Rule of Law" Mr Stepan MARGARYAN "Prosperous Armenia" Mr Edmon MARUKYAN Not included Mr Nikol PASHINYAN "Armenian National Congress" Mr Tevan POGHOSYAN "Heritage" Mr Aghvan VARDANYAN "Armenian Revolutionary Federation" Mrs Margarit YESAYAN "Republican" (RPA) Secretariat Mrs Arpi ARAKELIAN __________________ 21 January 2014/fc Samvel Farmanyan District 002 Birth date 17.02.1978 Party "Republican Party of Armenia" /RPA/ Factions 31.05.2012 "Republican" (RPA) Faction Committee 11.06.2012 Foreign Relations E-mail [email protected] Born on February 17, 1978 in the village of Spandaryan (Shirak province.) 1999 - Graduated from the faculty of History of the Yerevan State University. 2001 - Master’s Degree of the YSU Faculty of History. 2003 - Graduated from Lund University (Sweden) with a Master's Degree. Master of Arts. Historian. 2004 - Master’s Degree of the YSU Chair of Ethnography. Ph.D. in history. Since 2011 - Teaching in the History Department of Yerevan State University. 2003 - 2005 - Coordinator of the programs of “Civil Society ” and “Mass Media” in the Armenian branch of the “Assistance Fund of the Institute of Open Society.” 2005 - 2006 - Adviser to the President of the National Assembly related to foreign policy and external relations. April 2008 - Appointed as an assistant to the President of the Republic of Armenia. May 2008 - Press Secretary to the President of the Republic of Armenia. 2010 - 2012 - Director of information and analytical programs of the Public Television and the Public Radio Company of the Republic of Armenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Report from Yerevan Non-Partisan Website Devoted to Armenian Affairs, Human Rights and Democracy
    Keghart Report from Yerevan Non-partisan Website Devoted to Armenian Affairs, Human Rights https://keghart.org/mkrtchyan-report-yerevan/ and Democracy REPORT FROM YEREVAN Posted on December 12, 2020 by Keghart Category: Opinions Page: 1 Keghart Report from Yerevan Non-partisan Website Devoted to Armenian Affairs, Human Rights https://keghart.org/mkrtchyan-report-yerevan/ and Democracy By Karen Mkrtchyan, Yerevan, 10 December 2020 The situation in Armenia is back to what it used to be. The social fabric is torn. Sectarianism has raised its head and institutions lack authority. The Hayastantsi-Karabaghtsi conflict is out in the open again. Pashinyan's failure has been a huge blow to everyone--young and old--who had begun seeing a future for themselves here. The coming 20 years will either shape Armenia into a new, modern democracy or lead to gradual destruction. Unfortunately, Pashinyan failed sooner than critics had predicted. Now, it is difficult to persuade people to be positive. Migration has once again become a viable option. Some of our martyrs were highly-educated and were going to shape Armenia's future. Entrepreneurship was taking shape, thanks to them. Now, with many of them killed and the survivors dejected, we have no idea what the future will be. The threat to our borders, Syunik in particular, is the most worrying. Geopolitical developments are also highly concerning. More than a month since Pashinyan broke the news of our defeat so many things still remain unknown. With so much secrecy surrounding the deal, we don't know what Azerbaijan will lay claims to next.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia's Past, Present and Future
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 5-17-2020 Armenia’s Past, Present and Future -- Where it was? Where it is? Where is it going? -- Velvet Revolution 2018 Stella Tangiyan [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the International Relations Commons, and the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Tangiyan, Stella, "Armenia’s Past, Present and Future -- Where it was? Where it is? Where is it going? -- Velvet Revolution 2018". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2020. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/859 Armenia’s Past, Present and Future Where it was? Where it is? Where is it going? Velvet Revolution 2018 By Stella Tangiyan Advisor: Andrew Flibbert Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in Political Science 1 Table of Contents Armenian Velvet Revolution ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Chapter 1: Exploring Color Revolutions ………………………………………………………………………………… 9 Chapter 2: External Factors That Caused the Velvet Revolution …………………………………………… 33 Chapter 3: Internal Factors That Caused the Velvet Revolution …………………………………………… 46 Chapter 4: Post-Velvet Revolution Armenia ……………………………………………………………………….. 88 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 119 References …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 122 2 Acknowledgments From the bottom of my heart, I would like to thank Trinity College’s Political Science department. Professors that I met here truly inspired me to strive for knowledge and appreciate academia. Thank you to Professor Andrew Flibbert, my thesis advisor, who was with me throughout this whole journey. While not having much knowledge in the area of my research, he agreed to guide me through this process. His comments and contributions truly helped me with navigating my thesis-writing journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion Survey: Residents of Armenia
    Public Opinion Survey: Residents of Armenia July 23–August 15, 2018 Detailed Methodology • The survey was coordinated by Dr. Rasa Alisauskiene from Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of the Center for Insights in Survey Research. The field work was carried out by the Armenian Sociological Association. • Data was collected throughout Armenia between July 23 and August 15, 2018, through face-to-face interviews in respondents’ homes. • The sample consisted of 1,200 permanent residents of Armenia older than the age of 18 and eligible to vote. It is representative of the general population by age, gender, region and size/type settlement. • Sampling frame: Statistical Committee of the Republic of Armenia. Weighting: Data weighted for 11 regional groups, age and gender. • A multistage probability sampling method was used, with the random route and next birthday respondent selection procedures. • Stage one: All districts of Armenia are grouped into 11 regions. The survey was conducted throughout all regions of Armenia. The city of Yerevan was treated as a separate region. • Stage two: The territory of each region was split into settlements and grouped according to subtype (i.e. cities, towns and villages). • Settlements were selected at random. • The number of settlements selected in each region was proportional to the share of population living in the particular type of settlement in each region. • Stage three: Primary sampling units were described. • The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2.5 percent for the full sample. • The response rate was 64 percent. • Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report on Monitoring of Armenian Media Coverage of the December 9, 2018 Snap Parliamentary Elections November 26 - December 7, 2018
    YEREVAN PRESS CLUB INTERIM REPORT ON MONITORING OF ARMENIAN MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE DECEMBER 9, 2018 SNAP PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS NOVEMBER 26 - DECEMBER 7, 2018 This report is produced by the Yerevan Press Club as part of the Media for Informed Civic Engagement project, funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and implemented by the Media Initiatives Center. The contents of the report are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. YEREVAN PRESS CLUB www.ypc.am INTERIM REPORT ON MONITORING OF ARMENIAN MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE DECEMBER 9, 2018 SNAP PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS (NOVEMBER 26 - DECEMBER 7, 2018) THE THIRD STAGE OF THE MONITORING covered all the 12 days of the official pre- election promotion. At this stage the object of the monitoring were the main news and political programmes of six national terrestrial TV channels - First Channel of Public Television of Armenia (h1), “Armenia”, “Yerkir Media”, “Kentron”, Second Armenian TV Channel (h2) and “Shant”, as well as two online media regularly occupying high places in rankings - 1in.am and News.am. At the same time on News.am all the pieces were studied, while on 1in.am discussion political video programmes aired in prime time became the object of the monitoring (see below the monitoring methodology). At this stage the monitoring was devoted to revealing the attention and attitude of the media towards the political forces running in the elections. Added to that, in case of the TV channels both the frequency of references to the political forces in the programmes, and the volume of airtime allocated to the them was recorded (hereafter for the quantitative results of the monitoring see the attached tables).
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia 2020 Human Rights Report
    ARMENIA 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Armenia’s constitution provides for a parliamentary republic with a unicameral legislature, the National Assembly (parliament). The prime minister, elected by parliament, heads the government; the president, also elected by parliament, largely performs a ceremonial role. During 2018 parliamentary elections, the My Step coalition, led by Acting Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, won 70 percent of the vote and an overwhelming majority of seats in parliament. According to the assessment of the international election observation mission under the umbrella of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the parliamentary elections were held with respect for fundamental freedoms. The national police force is responsible for internal security, while the National Security Service is responsible for national security, intelligence activities, and border control. The Special Investigative Service (SIS) is a separate agency specializing in preliminary investigation of cases involving suspected abuses by public officials. The Investigative Committee is responsible for conducting pretrial investigations into general civilian and military criminal cases and incorporates investigative services. The National Security Service and the police chiefs report directly to the prime minister and are appointed by the president upon the prime minister’s recommendation. The cabinet appoints the heads of the Special Investigative Service and Investigative Committee upon the prime minister’s recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Unique Or Modular? Armenian Velvet Revolution in Comparative Approach, „Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej” 18(2020), Z
    B. Krzysztan, Unique or modular? Armenian Velvet Revolution in comparative approach, „Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej” 18(2020), z. 3, s. 143-171, DOI: https://doi.org/10.36874/RIESW.2020.3.7. Bartłomiej Krzysztan* Unique or modular? Armenian Velvet Revolution in comparative approach Wyjątkowa czy modułowa? Armeńska aksamitna rewolucja w perspektywie porównawczej Abstract: Most of the previous revolutions in the post-Soviet sphere were concentrated around two dimensions: reluctance to challenge abuses of power and the will to redirect the external trajectory. The Armenian Velvet Revolution marked the change of the axiology of revolution. Civil disobedi- ence was only focused on the corrupt political system based on clientelism and patronage. It was not addressing any issues related to the international situation. In statements, activists avoided references to foreign policy and change of geopolitical direction. The purpose of the paper is to identify con- vergent and separate features characterizing the Velvet Revolution in com- parison with breakthroughs classified as revolutions in the post-Soviet space after 1989. The research question is how the Armenian Velvet Revolution’s fea- tures stand out from previous revolutionary changes of power in the post-So- viet space, and to what extent they are convergent. The theoretical framework is based on multi-dimensional academic reflection on the factors character- izing particular revolutionary waves in post-Soviet space. Using comparatively the rich achievements of study on the Autumn of Nations, Color Revolutions, and Ukrainian Revolution of Dignity, this essay aims to inscribe the unique and modular factors characterizing the Armenian Velvet Revolution into a broader spectrum of theoretical and practical considerations on political breakthroughs in post-Soviet space.
    [Show full text]
  • AS/Per (2020) PV 06 EN
    AS/Per (2020) PV 06 20 November 2020 Standing Committee Minutes of the meeting held by videoconference on: Monday 12 October 2020 from 14:30 to 18:00 Tuesday 13 October 2020 from 09:30 to 13:00 and from 14:30 to 18:00 Thursday 22 October 2020 from 09:30 to 13:00 and from 14:30 to 18:00 Friday 23 October 2020 from 09:30 to 13:00 F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex | table.office@Council of Europe.int | Tel: + 33 3 88 41 35 07 AS/Per (2020) PV 06 1. OPENING OF THE MEETING BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY Mr Rik Daems, President of the Parliamentary Assembly, opened the meeting on 12 October 2020 at 14:30. 2. EXCHANGE OF VIEWS WITH MR MILTIADIS VARVITSIOTIS, ALTERNATE MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF GREECE, CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE Mr Varvitsiotis mentioned the relief felt after the meeting of the Turkish and Greek Foreign Ministers in Bratislava as they decided on the immediate beginning of preliminary talks. Mr Varvitsiotis stated that the announcement of new surveys on the Greek continental shelf at just six and a half miles from Greek shores escalated the situation in the region. This, together with opening of the Varosha seafront, were two signs that occurred during the past few days and violated international law and all relevant UN Security Council resolutions. These actions contravened the latest conclusions of the European Council, which reaffirmed its commitment to a comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus problem within the UN framework in accordance with the relevant UN Security Council Resolutions 550 and 7089.
    [Show full text]
  • Final NGO Report
    Republic of Armenia NGO replies to the list of issues on the implementation of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment in the Republic of Armenia in relation with the review of Armenia’s 3rd periodic review at the United Nations Committee against Torture The report was prepared with contribution from Armenian human rights organisations, which are members of the South Caucasus Network of Human Rights Defenders and partners of the Human Rights House Network: • Asparez Journalists’ Club • Helsinki Association for Human Rights • Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly – Vanadzor • Human Rights House Foundation • Jurists against Torture • Shahkhatun Women’s Democracy Promotion NGO • Public Information and Need of Knowledge NGO (PINK) • Women’s Resource Centre • And Relatives of Victims in Armed Forces Yerevan and Geneva, April 2012 Table of contents Articles 1 and 4 Pages 4-5 Question 1 Para. 1 Page 4 Question 3 Para. 2-5 Page 4 Question 4 Para. 6-10 Pages 4-5 Article 2 Pages 5-23 Question 5 Para. 11-13 Page 5 Question 6a Para. 14 Page 5 Question 6b Para. 15-19 Pages 5-6 Question 6d Para. 20-29 Pages 6-7 Question 7 Para. 30-31 Page 8 Question 8 Para. 32 Pages 8-13 – Case of Genya Grigoryan at Artashat Police Station Page 9 – Case of Julieta Hovhannisyan Page 9 – Case of Srbuhi Baghdasaryan Page 9 – Case f Artur Kharatyan Page 10 – Case of Silva Ramazyan at Tumanyan Police Department Page 10 – Case of Arman Ramazyan at Tumanyan Police Department Page 10 – Case of Artyom Arakelyan Page 10 – Case of Arman Yengibaryan Page 11 – Case of Garnik Melikyan Page 12 – Case of Vladimir Tonoyan Page 13 Question 9 Para.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Election Survey, Wave 4
    pre-election survey, 4 rt wave Pass... paaaaaaass... 2021June How do you assess the internal political situation in the country? Definitely calm 3.5% Rather calm 7.3% Rather tense 26.6% Very tense 61.7% Difficult to answer 0.8% The number of criminal cases has recently increased in Armenia. How do you assess the work of the RA Police in the fight against such criminal cases? Completely positive 19.0% Rather positive 24.3% Rather neGative 23.4% Completely neGative 27.2% Difficult to answer 6.1% Please rate the activities of the following figures on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is the lowest negative rating and 5 is the highest positive rating. Ombudsman Arman Tatoyan 3.8 Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia Nikol 2.5 Pashinyan The second president of Armenia, leader of the Armenia Alliance Robert Kocharyan 2.3 President of the Republic of Armenia Armen 2.3 SarGsyan PAP leader GaGik Tsarukyan 2.1 The third President of the Republic of Armenia 1.8 Serzh SarGsyan Republic Party leader Aram SarGsyan 1.8 LHP leader Edmon Marukyan 1.8 First President of the Republic of Armenia, ANC 1.6 leader Levon Ter-Petrosyan “I Have the Honor” alliance leader Arthur 1.5 Vanetsyan Are you going to participate in the June 20, 2021 Parliamentary elections? Definitely will participate 53.9% Rather will participate 10.3% Rather will not participate 12.8% Definitely will not participate 22.7% Definitely will participate 0.4% If the elections to the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia are this Sunday, which party or alliance will you vote for? Armenia
    [Show full text]
  • N-2019-0477-2) (Summary
    Study on Media Consumption and the Level of Misinformation in Armenia (N-2019-0477-2) (Summary) This study was carried out within the framework of sub-grant program provided by the “Union of Informed Citizens” Consulting NGO. Armenia 2019 Methodology Survey type Quantitative, sampled Semi-structured interview, CAPI (Computer-assisted Research method personal interviewing*) Survey period June 23-July 9, 2019 Sample size (n) 1200 interviews Distributed among all RA regions (including Yerevan) Sample distribution in RA in proportion with the number of population Stratified, clustered sampling based on the principle Sample type of randomness 95% confidence interval, ±2.8% margin of error Confidence range, margin of error 18 years old and older Age of respondents * Computer-assisted personal interviewing is an interviewing technique through which the interviewer enters the data obtained from the respondent during the face-to-face interview into the electronic questionnaire installed on the computer. Sex and Age Distribution of Respondents Age groups of respondents 17.8% Sex of respondents 18 -25 19.6% 26 -35 35 12.4% 36 – 45 65 18.4% 46 – 55 Male Female 56 – 65 20.0% 66 and older 11.8% APR Group Geography of the Survey APR Group The graph does not show the answers that received less than 1%. APR Group What kind of information do you mostly find interesting? Domestic political processes 18.1% Music 12.6% Social 11.8% Entertainment 10.4% Economy 9.8% Foreign policy 8.1% Culture 7.1% Sports 5.8% Daily life (related to the lives of friends) 5.4% Human rights 4.7% Incidents / accidents / emergencies 2.5% Crimes 1.1% n=1200 Total=100% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% 20.0% APR Group What kind of information do you mostly find interesting? Answers according to age group.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the 16Th EU-Armenia PCC, January 2016
    European Parliament 2014-2019 EU-Armenia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee MINUTES Sixteenth Meeting Wednesday 20 January 2016, 15:00-18:30 SDM S.5 Thursday 21 January 2016, 09:00-12:30 SDM S.1 / LOW S.4 Strasbourg The meeting opened at 15:07 1. Opening remarks by the Co-Chairs of the EU-Armenia PCC Co-Chair Sajjad KARIM opened the meeting by welcoming all participants, and especially guest speakers Mr Karen NAZARYAN, Deputy Foreign Minister of Armenia, Mr Adriano MARTINS, Deputy Head of Division, EEAS and Mr Mathieu BOUSQUET, Head of Unit, DG Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations, European Commission. In turn, Co-Chair Samvel FARMANYAN introduced the six members composing the multi-party Armenian Delegation, stressing that all forces present in the Armenian National Assembly were thus represented by Mr Alexander ARZOUMANIAN (Heritage), Mr Levon DOKHOLYAN, (Rule of Law), Mr Vahe ENFIAJYAN, (Prosperous Armenia), Mr Edmon MARUKYAN, (independent), Mr Nikol PASHINYAN, (Armenian National Congress), Mr Aghvan VARDANYAN (ARF) and himself, representing the ruling Republican Party of Armenia. 2. Adoption of the draft agenda The draft agenda was adopted without changes. 600.468 3. Adoption of the minutes of the fifteenth meeting of the EU-Armenia PCC held in Yerevan on 19 and 20 March 2015 Members were informed that the minutes of this meeting, prepared as customarily by the host Parliament, had been distributed and were available in their files. No correction suggestions having been received by the following day, they were deemed adopted. 4. Overview of EU-Armenia relations Co-Chair KARIM reminded that the coming year would be an important one in terms of EU- Armenia relations, with formal negotiations in view of a new agreement having just started.
    [Show full text]