DOCSLIB.ORG

Report from Yerevan Non-Partisan Website Devoted to Armenian Affairs, Human Rights and Democracy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report from Yerevan Non-Partisan Website Devoted to Armenian Affairs, Human Rights and Democracy Keghart Report from Yerevan Non-partisan Website Devoted to Armenian Affairs, Human Rights https://keghart.org/mkrtchyan-report-yerevan/ and Democracy REPORT FROM YEREVAN Posted on December 12, 2020 by Keghart Category: Opinions Page: 1 Keghart Report from Yerevan Non-partisan Website Devoted to Armenian Affairs, Human Rights https://keghart.org/mkrtchyan-report-yerevan/ and Democracy By Karen Mkrtchyan, Yerevan, 10 December 2020 The situation in Armenia is back to what it used to be. The social fabric is torn. Sectarianism has raised its head and institutions lack authority. The Hayastantsi-Karabaghtsi conflict is out in the open again. Pashinyan's failure has been a huge blow to everyone--young and old--who had begun seeing a future for themselves here. The coming 20 years will either shape Armenia into a new, modern democracy or lead to gradual destruction. Unfortunately, Pashinyan failed sooner than critics had predicted. Now, it is difficult to persuade people to be positive. Migration has once again become a viable option. Some of our martyrs were highly-educated and were going to shape Armenia's future. Entrepreneurship was taking shape, thanks to them. Now, with many of them killed and the survivors dejected, we have no idea what the future will be. The threat to our borders, Syunik in particular, is the most worrying. Geopolitical developments are also highly concerning. More than a month since Pashinyan broke the news of our defeat so many things still remain unknown. With so much secrecy surrounding the deal, we don't know what Azerbaijan will lay claims to next. The government has denied that villages from Tavush will be handed over to the enemy, but if we are returning to the borders as drawn during the USSR era, some villages in Tavush will be claimed by the Azeris. There are villages in Ararat region as well that we claimed from Nakhichevan during the first Artsakh war. We have no guarantee that those will not be returned. Another mystery is the chartered flight that took off from Yerevan for Baku two days ago. Some sources say it had taken Azeri prisoners to bring Armenians back, but that too hasn't been verified. With so much going on, we are stuck between the impotence of the government wanting to continue holding on to power and the threat of the former regime wanting to storm back, using Vazgen Manukyan as a front. A disreputable politician, it's shocking that some see him as the next prime minister. What options are there? Everything has to transpire in the National Assembly. 1. Impeachment: Should Pashinyan refuse to resign, MPs can force him to do so through impeachment. If he is impeached, he would have no choice but to leave. His government will be automatically replaced by a new cabinet placed by the next PM who will be elected at the time of impeachment. The bill introduced to impeach Pashinyan would already have his successor decided. With one vote he will be booted and with another the new PM will be elected. The seat will not remain vacant even for an hour. This will ensure continuity. However, parliament at this stage is unlikely to initiate an impeachment process unless MPs are certain it will pass. According to the new impeachment law, parliament can't attempt to impeach a PM more than once in a year. This means should the opposition initiate impeachment and fail to pass it, it will have to wait a year before it can attempt to re-impeach. As it stands, 66 MPs are needed to pass an impeachment. The opposition is short of that. So, unless they are sure more MPs will leave the ruling party or will support impeachment, they will not go down that road. This will become a viable option should the ruling party feel Pashinyan is drowning them all. Page: 2 Keghart Report from Yerevan Non-partisan Website Devoted to Armenian Affairs, Human Rights https://keghart.org/mkrtchyan-report-yerevan/ and Democracy 2. Pashinyan's voluntary resignation: This is second option, of course, . Should Pashinyan agree to step down, the PM's seat will remain vacant and parliament will have to vote for a new PM either from amongst its ranks or someone nominated for the post. Option A: Someone from the ruling party takes over. In this scenario, the ruling party can decide to elect a replacement for Pashinyan to put together the next government. While this is possible, since the ruling party enjoys a parliamentary majority, recent events have shown it won't be easy. Other than Pashinyan no other leader commands support and respect in the parliament. Although Papikyan and Mirzoyan seem to be likely replacements, internal bickering, which has become even more evident after the war, makes it improbable that anyone can lead the team. Had Pashinyan a natural successor, My Step would have voted him or her in Pashinyan's stead by now. Their silent tolerance of Pashinyan shows their desperation for a replacement. Option B: Pashinyan steps down and a member of the opposition is elected. In this scenario, even if the ruling My Step faction fails to nominate a candidate, they will have to elect a candidate from the opposition. They will be met with two choices: Vazgen Manukyan, supported in the Parliament by Prosperous Armenia, and Edmon Marukyan, proposed and supported by the Bright Armenia party. Each of these candidates will need the votes of the ruling party to be elected. Edmon Marukyan has a better chance than Manukyan. Considering the reputation of the people who are supporting Manukyan, it is unlikely that the ruling party will risk voting for him. A Manukyan government means a government formed by the Republicans, Dashnaks, Kocharyan, Vanetsyan, Hrant Bagratyan, Tsarukyan and a host of neo-Republican parties in disguise. One can't be adventurous enough to think My Step will risk allowing the former regime get anywhere close to power. Guess who will be the first victims of their revenge should Manukyan get power? With all the court cases and arrests in the past two years, vendetta is very likely. This leaves them with the other option--Marukyan. While Marukyan has been critical of the government, they, My Step MPs at least know there is no threat to their lives or their freedoms. They would rather have Marukyan form government than not. Should this happen, even Prosperous Armenia will abandon the other 16 and join in supporting Marukyan who enjoys cordial relations with them. His ability to criticize without getting too personal might make him an acceptable PM even for those 16 parties backing Manukyan who would rather work with him in an interim government than lead a futile street movement. 3. Snap Elections: Per this scenario, the PM resigns and parliament makes two attempts to elect a new PM, failing which snap elections would be declared. This is the most unlikely option as none of the parliamentary forces want an election at this stage. The country is going through too much and can't afford to hold elections fresh out of war. Another factor is the realisation that most of the MPs stand no chance of ever being elected. They would prefer to elect someone PM and enjoy the perks of being parliamentarians than risk dispersing the parliament and become jobless, losing all the benefits in the process. In all scenarios, the role of parliament is paramount. The street agitations won't reach a point to force Pashinyan resign especially when those organizing them enjoy no sympathy among the furious Page: 3 Keghart Report from Yerevan Non-partisan Website Devoted to Armenian Affairs, Human Rights https://keghart.org/mkrtchyan-report-yerevan/ and Democracy masses. Nobody trusts the former regime. This is why despite the losses, the streets aren't flooded with people the way they otherwise would have been. Pashinyan will eventually leave but through pressure from his team. It is to influence the MPs of the ruling party that people should work to impress upon rather than Pashinyan. Page: 4 Keghart Report from Yerevan Non-partisan Website Devoted to Armenian Affairs, Human Rights https://keghart.org/mkrtchyan-report-yerevan/ and Democracy There are no comments yet. Page: 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Armenian Presidential ELECTION Sept. 1996
    104th CONGRESS Printed for the use of the 2nd Session Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe Armenian Presidential election September 22, 1996 A Report Prepared by the Staff of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe ABOUT THE ORGANIZATION (OSCE) The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, also known as the Helsinki process, traces its origin to the signing of the Helsinki Final Act in Finland on August 1, 1975, by the leaders of 33 European countries, the United States and Canada. Since then, its membership has expanded to 55, reflecting the breakup of the Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia. (The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Serbia and Montenegro, has been suspended since 1992, leaving the number of countries fully participating at 54.) As of January 1, 1995, the formal name of the Helsinki process was changed to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). The OSCE is engaged in standard setting in fields including military security, economic and envi- ronmental cooperation, and human rights and humanitarian concerns. In addition, it undertakes a variety of preventive diplomacy initiatives designed to prevent, manage and resolve conflict within and among the participating States. The OSCE has its main office in Vienna, Austria, where weekly meetings of permanent represen- tatives are held. In addition, specialized seminars and meetings are convened in various locations and periodic consultations among Senior Officials, Ministers and Heads of State or Government are held. ABOUT THE COMMISSION (CSCE) The Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE), also known as the Helsinki Commission, is a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mirrorc SPECTATOR Since 1932
    THE ARMENIAN MIRRORc SPECTATOR Since 1932 Volume LXXXXI, NO. 34, Issue 4676 MARCH 13, 2021 $2.00 Boston City Council ‘Jeopardy!’ Show Supports Genocide Opposition Continues to Clue Calls Armenia Education, Including Irredentist towards Armenian Genocide Rally Against Pashinyan Karabakh BOSTON — As it stands, Boston YEREVAN (Armenpress, ‘Jeopardy!’ Expresses Regrets Public Schools currently do not require Panorama.) — The joint candi- their history or social science curricu- CULVER CITY, Calif. (gwwire. date of the Fatherland Salvation lum frameworks to include the topic of com, Twitter) — The game show Movement Vazgen Manukyan genocide when teaching United States “Jeopardy!” used the clue “This said during a demonstration at history or world history. country has been accused of irreden- Baghramyan Street that they At the Council meeting the first week tism, the reclaiming of old territory, will patiently move forward of March, the Council voted to adopt over the Nagorno-Karabakh area in their struggle, demanding the a resolution in support of passage of Azerbaijan” in an episode aired on resignation of Prime Minister House Docket (H.D.) 1167, “An Act March 4. The answer given as “What Nikol Pashinyan. Concerning Genocide Education” and is Armenia” by Jim Cooper was ac- Vazgen Manukyan empha- Senate Docket (S.D.) 1592, “An Act cepted as correct, but it led very sized that it is necessary to Advancing and Promotion Genocide quickly to a social media kerfuffle. organize elections, so as the Education” in the Massachusetts State Various individual Armenians, angry people could make a choice, legislature. that the clue, using the word “accused,” but that should be done not un- H.D.
    [Show full text]
  • DECEMBER-2020 Table of Contents I. Liberation of Lachin and Rebuilding
    DECEMBER-2020 BULLETIN H I GHL I GHT OF THE FORE I G N P O L I CY OF REPUBL I C OF AZERBA I JAN Table of contents I. Liberation of Lachin and rebuilding Karabakh 2 II. Restoration of a stable peace in the region requires a revision of approaches 3 III. Armenia-Azerbaijan Propaganda War and Western Media Bias 5 IV. Armenia plunges into political crisis after defeat in the Second Karabakh War 7 V. United Nations General Assembly convenes special session on the coronavirus pandemic 9 VI. The Southern Gas Corridor opens up gas supply to Europe 10 VII. Azerbaijan and Afghanistan discuss boosting bilateral ties 11 VIII. Year in Review 12 I. Liberation of Lachin and rebuilding have been entirely demolished and razed to Karabakh the ground during the period they were under Lachin became the last of three occupied the control of Armenia. Apart from residential districts due to be handed back by Armenia as and administrative buildings, according to the part of the Russian-brokered peace deal official sources, 700 historic and cultural following the six-week war. In a televised monuments damaged or destroyed; 927 address to the nation on December 1, libraries; 808 cultural centers; 85 music and art President Ilham Aliyev congratulated the schools; 22 museums with over 100,000 nation on the return of Lachin. “We, for our artefacts; 4 art galleries, 4 theatres, 2 concert part, have already restored justice. We have halls in these territories over the last thirty restored historical justice. Our goal is to years.
    [Show full text]
  • List of the Armenian Delegation Participating in the 14Th EU-Armenia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee Meeting
    List of the Armenian Delegation participating in the 14th EU-Armenia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee meeting 5-6 February 2014 Strasbourg MEMBERS Last Name First Name Factions Mr Samvel FARMANYAN "Republican" (RPA) (Head) Mr Vahram BAGHDASARYAN "Republican" (RPA) Mr Karen BOTOYAN "Rule of Law" Mr Stepan MARGARYAN "Prosperous Armenia" Mr Edmon MARUKYAN Not included Mr Nikol PASHINYAN "Armenian National Congress" Mr Tevan POGHOSYAN "Heritage" Mr Aghvan VARDANYAN "Armenian Revolutionary Federation" Mrs Margarit YESAYAN "Republican" (RPA) Secretariat Mrs Arpi ARAKELIAN __________________ 21 January 2014/fc Samvel Farmanyan District 002 Birth date 17.02.1978 Party "Republican Party of Armenia" /RPA/ Factions 31.05.2012 "Republican" (RPA) Faction Committee 11.06.2012 Foreign Relations E-mail [email protected] Born on February 17, 1978 in the village of Spandaryan (Shirak province.) 1999 - Graduated from the faculty of History of the Yerevan State University. 2001 - Master’s Degree of the YSU Faculty of History. 2003 - Graduated from Lund University (Sweden) with a Master's Degree. Master of Arts. Historian. 2004 - Master’s Degree of the YSU Chair of Ethnography. Ph.D. in history. Since 2011 - Teaching in the History Department of Yerevan State University. 2003 - 2005 - Coordinator of the programs of “Civil Society ” and “Mass Media” in the Armenian branch of the “Assistance Fund of the Institute of Open Society.” 2005 - 2006 - Adviser to the President of the National Assembly related to foreign policy and external relations. April 2008 - Appointed as an assistant to the President of the Republic of Armenia. May 2008 - Press Secretary to the President of the Republic of Armenia. 2010 - 2012 - Director of information and analytical programs of the Public Television and the Public Radio Company of the Republic of Armenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Armenia Elections 2008 IDEA
    International IDEA Office in Armenia Update on Presidential Elections in Armenia Date: 21.02.08 The views expressed in this document are those of independent researcher- analysts, and do not represent the official position of International IDEA. The information, analyses and conclusions are based on the articles of Armenian and international media (printed and broadcast), announcements of the political forces, consultations with various experts and analysts. On 19 February 2007, the Presidential Elections were held in Armenia. The polls were open from 8AM until 8PM. Turnout: According to the Central Electoral Commission (CEC) 1.642.057 voters, or 69.26% of the eligible voters participated in the elections. The highest turnout - 74.81% - was in the region of Gegharkunik. The lowest turnout was in the region of Shirak - 63.70%. Preliminary Results: According to the Election Code, the CEC should publish preliminary results no later than 24 hours after elections, i.e. 20.02.08 8PM. However, CEC summed up the results much earlier and published them on 20.02.08, at 12 PM. 1. Serge Sargssyan (Prime Minister): 52.8% 2. Levon Ter-Petrossyan (First President): 21.5% 3. Arthur Baghdasaryan (Country of Law, ex-parliamentary Chairman): 11.6% 4. Vahan Hovanessyan (ARF, Parliament Deputy-Chairman): 6.12% 5. Vazgen Manukyan (National Democratic Union): 1.28% 6. Tigran Karapetyan (Popular Party): 0.6% 7. Artashes Geghamyan (National Unity): 0.46% 8. Arman Melikyan (ex-foreign Minister of N.Karabagh): 0.27 9. Aram Harutunyan (naitonal Concord): 0.19% Among eight members of the CEC, two members did not sign the protocol of preliminary election results.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Movements and Social Media: the Case of the Armenian 'Velvet
    Social Movements and Social Media: the case of the Armenian ‘velvet’ revolution Eliza Khurshudyan Stockholm University Department of Media Studies Master’s Programme in Media and Communication Studies Master Thesis Supervisor: Miyase Christensen Submission date: 24/05/2019 Abstract Depending on the political environment, economic, cultural and social factors, the digital era provides new opportunities and constraints for mobilization of social movements. The current research was focused on exploring how protest leaders and activists used and perceived social media as a tool for communication and organization during the movement “take a step, #RejectSerzh”; a series of peaceful, anti-governmental protests which led to a shift of governmental power in Armenia. Prior work dedicated to unpacking the relationship between social movements and social media have focused on a few empirical cases. Hence, a case study of a yet underexplored social movement can add to this strand of literature. The methodological approach displayed in this study follows a mixed-method model. Interviews with activists of the movement “take a step, #RejectSerzh” and content analysis of official social media accounts of leaders of the movement “take a step, #RejectSerzh” were expected to provide a diverse perspective on social media tactics during the movement. The results implied that social media were perceived as one of the main contributors to the fulfilment of objectives of the movement “take a step, #RejectSerzh” in multiple ways: social media allowed for fast communication, decentralized organization, testimony of the non-violent nature of the movement, as well as validation of the movement through transparency of action (most importantly, in real-time).
    [Show full text]
  • Informal Networks and Formal Institutions in Armenia
    WAR, BUSINESS AND POLITICS: INFORMAL NetworKS AND ForMAL Institutions IN ARMenia Alexander Iskandaryan, Hrant Mikaelian and Sergey Minasyan Yerevan • 2016 UDC 32.001:330:355/359 WAR, BUSINESS AND POLITICS: INFORMAL NETWORKS AND FORMAL INSTITUTIONS IN ARMENIA. – Alexander Iskandaryan, Hrant Mikaelian and Sergey Minasyan. –Yerevan: Caucasus Institute. 2016. - 144 p. The volume presents the results of a study of formal and informal groups and mechanisms within Armenia’s political, economic and military elites, aiming to reveal trends in formal institution-building and the changing role of informality in Armenia’s power system since its independence from the USSR. The study relies on data from over 50 interviews with elite actors, backed up by archive materials, media stories, and expert opinions. A separate case study looks at the emergence and evolution of the Armenian army. Research team: Liana Avetisyan, Luiza Ayvazyan, Gayane Baghdasaryan, Ani Grigoryan, Johnny Melikyan, Tatevik Sargsyan, Marina Saryan, Naira Vardanyan Editing by Nina Iskandaryan Copy editing by AJE Cover design by Matit / www.matit.am Layout by Collage / www.collage.am ISBN 978-9939-1-0464-5 © Caucasus Institute, 2016 The present study was conducted with the support of the Academic Swiss Caucasus Net (ASCN), a programme aimed at promoting the social sciences and humanities in the South Caucasus (primarily Georgia and Armenia). Its activities foster the emergence of a new generation of talented scholars. Promising junior researchers receive support through research projects, capacity-building, training and scholarships. The programme emphasises the advancement of individuals who, thanks to their ASCN experience, become better integrated in international academic networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia's Past, Present and Future
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 5-17-2020 Armenia’s Past, Present and Future -- Where it was? Where it is? Where is it going? -- Velvet Revolution 2018 Stella Tangiyan [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the International Relations Commons, and the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Tangiyan, Stella, "Armenia’s Past, Present and Future -- Where it was? Where it is? Where is it going? -- Velvet Revolution 2018". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2020. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/859 Armenia’s Past, Present and Future Where it was? Where it is? Where is it going? Velvet Revolution 2018 By Stella Tangiyan Advisor: Andrew Flibbert Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in Political Science 1 Table of Contents Armenian Velvet Revolution ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Chapter 1: Exploring Color Revolutions ………………………………………………………………………………… 9 Chapter 2: External Factors That Caused the Velvet Revolution …………………………………………… 33 Chapter 3: Internal Factors That Caused the Velvet Revolution …………………………………………… 46 Chapter 4: Post-Velvet Revolution Armenia ……………………………………………………………………….. 88 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 119 References …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 122 2 Acknowledgments From the bottom of my heart, I would like to thank Trinity College’s Political Science department. Professors that I met here truly inspired me to strive for knowledge and appreciate academia. Thank you to Professor Andrew Flibbert, my thesis advisor, who was with me throughout this whole journey. While not having much knowledge in the area of my research, he agreed to guide me through this process. His comments and contributions truly helped me with navigating my thesis-writing journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion Survey: Residents of Armenia
    Public Opinion Survey: Residents of Armenia July 23–August 15, 2018 Detailed Methodology • The survey was coordinated by Dr. Rasa Alisauskiene from Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of the Center for Insights in Survey Research. The field work was carried out by the Armenian Sociological Association. • Data was collected throughout Armenia between July 23 and August 15, 2018, through face-to-face interviews in respondents’ homes. • The sample consisted of 1,200 permanent residents of Armenia older than the age of 18 and eligible to vote. It is representative of the general population by age, gender, region and size/type settlement. • Sampling frame: Statistical Committee of the Republic of Armenia. Weighting: Data weighted for 11 regional groups, age and gender. • A multistage probability sampling method was used, with the random route and next birthday respondent selection procedures. • Stage one: All districts of Armenia are grouped into 11 regions. The survey was conducted throughout all regions of Armenia. The city of Yerevan was treated as a separate region. • Stage two: The territory of each region was split into settlements and grouped according to subtype (i.e. cities, towns and villages). • Settlements were selected at random. • The number of settlements selected in each region was proportional to the share of population living in the particular type of settlement in each region. • Stage three: Primary sampling units were described. • The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2.5 percent for the full sample. • The response rate was 64 percent. • Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Independence and Transition
    The Politics of Independence and Transition INTERVIEW WITH ARA SAHAKYAN ormer deputy speaker of the Armenian Parliament answers questions on polit- F ical developments in Soviet Armenia that led to indpendence, a legislative process, economic transformation problems, and democratization in a time of war. Sahakyan assesses the role of the Armenian National Movement in these changes and the future. Demokratizatsiya: You have played a major role in the Karabakh movement, the establishment of the new Republic of Armenia, and the establishment of its institutions and new political culture. What led you to be involved in the move- ment? What changed the Karabakh movement from a request for the annexation of Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast to Armenia to a national revival move- ment that aspired for democracy and independence? Sahakyan: The moving force of the Karabakh movement that emerged in Feb- ruary 1988 came from among the middle-level intellectuals within the literary, sci- entific, and teaching professions, and to a lesser extent also from the industrial or engineering fields. The political credo of this generation born after World War II was stamped by the duality of the times. On the one hand, this generation was raised under the influence of the Khrushchevian critique of Stalinist despotism, the hopes raised by the “thawing” of the cold war, and the antigovernment actions and ideals proclaimed by the dissident movement; on the other hand, their atti- tudes were warped under the pressure of the conformist dispositions of Brezhnev’s years of “stagnation.” The political line being pursued beginning in 1985 under perestroika definitely moved the pendulum of the intellectual and spiritual duality of our generation in the direction of law and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report on Monitoring of Armenian Media Coverage of the December 9, 2018 Snap Parliamentary Elections November 26 - December 7, 2018
    YEREVAN PRESS CLUB INTERIM REPORT ON MONITORING OF ARMENIAN MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE DECEMBER 9, 2018 SNAP PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS NOVEMBER 26 - DECEMBER 7, 2018 This report is produced by the Yerevan Press Club as part of the Media for Informed Civic Engagement project, funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and implemented by the Media Initiatives Center. The contents of the report are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. YEREVAN PRESS CLUB www.ypc.am INTERIM REPORT ON MONITORING OF ARMENIAN MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE DECEMBER 9, 2018 SNAP PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS (NOVEMBER 26 - DECEMBER 7, 2018) THE THIRD STAGE OF THE MONITORING covered all the 12 days of the official pre- election promotion. At this stage the object of the monitoring were the main news and political programmes of six national terrestrial TV channels - First Channel of Public Television of Armenia (h1), “Armenia”, “Yerkir Media”, “Kentron”, Second Armenian TV Channel (h2) and “Shant”, as well as two online media regularly occupying high places in rankings - 1in.am and News.am. At the same time on News.am all the pieces were studied, while on 1in.am discussion political video programmes aired in prime time became the object of the monitoring (see below the monitoring methodology). At this stage the monitoring was devoted to revealing the attention and attitude of the media towards the political forces running in the elections. Added to that, in case of the TV channels both the frequency of references to the political forces in the programmes, and the volume of airtime allocated to the them was recorded (hereafter for the quantitative results of the monitoring see the attached tables).
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of 2008 Presidential Election Observation Results
    HELSINKI CITIZENS' ASSEMBLY VANADZOR OFFICE 3tLUbL43ULPU~UPUSbULtULUUUUFLtU3b4ULU3flPb4PUUtL3ULt Analysis of 2008 Presidential Election Observation Results Analytic Report VANADZOR 2008 Page I 59Tig.n Mcrs 11.. V.n.dmr. 317201, RepUic ofAmmi4 Tcl. (+I74 322) 4 22 68: Email: hmy&&m URL: unnu.hsv.am vuu hrlon SbwuG Uhbb W.4wGudnn. 377204.3ul)uluaulGb 3ulpwqtan~pjntG.hbn. (r314 322)4 22 68: tk. *nuvl'm t~.huugb www.Mon.un HELSINKI CITIZENS ASSEMBLY VANADZOR OFFICE - CONTENTS Introduction 3 Shoncmings of Legal Regulation of Election Processes 3 Public-Political Environment in Pre-election Period 4 Obse~atiOnof Pre-election Campaigning 5 Observation of the Voting Day 8 Conclusion 10 Page 2 HELSINKI CITIZENS' ASSEMBLY VANADZOR OFFICE 3tLUbL43ULPUCLUPUSbU4ULUUUUFLbU3b4ULU3nPbQPUUbL3U4 lntroduclion Presidential eledions in Armenia were held on February 19. 2008. The president of Anenla IS elected by absolute majority system. If, in the first round, no candidate receives an absolute majonly of votes, a second round will take place 14 days after the first round between the two leading candidates. Parties and citizens have the right to self-nominate and nominate presidential candidates in Anenia. Durina residential election, the whole tenitow of the re~ublicis considered one majoritarian constit"ency. For the administration of 2008 iresidential eledion. 41 Territorial Election Commissions (TECs) and 1.923 Precinct Election Commissions (PECs) have been foned. Nine candidates will run in the election. The candidates were: I.Arthur Vahani Baghdassaryan Rule of LawlOrinats Yerkir 2. Artashes Mamikoni Geghamyan National Unity Party 3. Tigran Karapeti Karapelyan People's Party 4. Aram Sergeyi Hamlyunyan National Accord Party 5. Vahan Eduardi Hwhannisyan Armenian Revolutionary PartylDashnaktsutyun 6.
    [Show full text]