Frozen Using Behavioral Design to Overcome Decision-Making Paralysis Doblin Is One of the World’S Leading Design-Driven Innovation Practices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Frozen Using Behavioral Design to Overcome Decision-Making Paralysis Doblin Is One of the World’S Leading Design-Driven Innovation Practices Frozen Using behavioral design to overcome decision-making paralysis Doblin is one of the world’s leading design-driven innovation practices. Taking a user-centric, systematic approach, our multidisciplinary teams combine deep experience in strategy, research, and design to help clients set innovation strategy; to design, build, and launch bold break- throughs; and to become more effective innovators. Headquartered in Chicago with offices in New York, Toronto, Portland, Boston, Delhi, and London, Doblin is part of Deloitte Consulting LLP. www.doblin.com | @DoblinGlobal CONTENTS Introduction | 2 What causes consumer paralysis? | 4 Taking action: Getting past paralysis | 7 Taking action: Prompting consumer decision making and action | 11 Putting it all together | 13 Endnotes | 15 Frozen Introduction T’S a behavior that most companies and policy principles with customer-centered insights, compa- makers know too well: Often consumers—even nies can more effectively address and design for a Iloyal ones—don’t follow through on making pur- variety of behavioral challenges (see the sidebar, “A chases or taking action, like choosing a health care Deloitte series on behavioral economics and man- plan. Something happens along the way, even when agement”). Consider these two examples: the end result of making a choice would clearly be • Who wants to buy a car … during the in their best interest. So what altered their decision Great Recession? The economy in the fall of making? And why? And what can companies do to 2008 was in a downturn, and consumer fears reengage these consumers? of job loss prompted a severe slowdown in auto In the quest to prompt action, companies are em- sales. To help address the economic environ- bracing the field of behavioral design to craft solu- ment, Hyundai introduced the Assurance pro- tions that take into account how people actually gram, an innovative buy-back program that think and behave, rather than how they logically promised any car buyer who lost his job could should behave. By combining behavioral economics return the car, with Hyundai Capital America as- 2 Using behavioral design to overcome decision-making paralysis suming the difference in purchase price. While only 350 people took advantage of the offer over A DELOITTE SERIES ON BEHAVIORAL the life of the program,1 by reducing consumers’ ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT uncertainty and emotional barriers to action, Behavioral economics is the examination Hyundai converted job loss anxiety into car pur- of how psychological, social, and emotional chases. It sold 435,000 vehicles in 2009—an 8 factors often conflict with and override percent increase, when most other automakers economic incentives when individuals or groups make decisions. This article is part were posting sharp declines—in part by remov- of a series that examines the influence and ing the fear of job loss from the equation.2 consequences of behavioral principles on • Are you saving enough? Launched in 1998, the choices people make related to their Allianz’s Save More Tomorrow (SMarT) pro- work. Collectively, these articles, interviews, and reports illustrate how understanding gram was designed to help people more eas- biases and cognitive limitations is a first ily save for retirement. Grounded in an opt-out step to developing countermeasures that option that required participants to actively limit their impact on an organization. For dis-enroll, SMarT provided a manageable set more information visit http://dupress.com/ of fund options. Rather than reducing current collection/behavioral-insights/. take-home pay, the program incorporated an- nual increases automatically generated from employees’ yearly raises, rendering them nearly Specifically, three common hurdles emerge: Con- imperceptible. In its first three and a half years, sumers freeze when too many choices are present- SMarT boosted average savings rates more than ed, they strongly prefer present payoffs to future 350 percent, and of the 78 percent of partici- rewards, and, when presented with an important pants who joined initially, 98 percent remained choice, they are often overcome by fears of failure. through two pay raises.3 While many of the examples covered are specific Whether increasing car sales or personal savings, to consumers saving for retirement, the principles issues like these—and many others like them—re- gleaned from solutions to this classic financial ser- quire organizations to successfully solve for two dis- vices quandary apply in many other situations as tinct dimensions of the same behavioral problem: well. Learning from these examples can help com- helping consumers overcome decision-making pa- panies better identify causes of paralysis and ad- ralysis and commit to new actions. As the examples dress them in their own industries. above demonstrate, companies that deliberately This article will offer a behavioral-design inspired design solutions that overcome consumers’ inertia model that practitioners can leverage to help con- and indecisiveness can get more new customers in sumers overcome their decision-making paralysis: the door, grow their base by increasing consump- addressing consumers’ mind-sets in defining op- tion, and, consequently, move the needle on their tions, their perceived ability to make both confident bottom lines. and smart choices, and finally, ways in which they So what keeps consumers stuck in the status quo can be prompted to take action. and paralyzed by the prospect of embracing change? 3 Frozen What causes consumer paralysis? ET’S first explore why people get stuck in the tends to reduce consumers’ confidence in a decision first place: What contributes to choosing the they have made, and can prevent making one at all. path of inaction over that of action? There L Buying jam is one thing . but a similar tendency are multiple causes: an overwhelming number of has been shown to occur when people are choosing options with no clear way to gauge which is best; a retirement plan.6 Research shows that an inverse the tension inherent in being forced to make a correlation exists between the number of plans choice now, despite an uncertain future payoff; and offered and the likelihood of signing up. A 2001 fears associated with the idea of choosing poorly. study indicated nearly a 20 percent decline in Each of these symptoms can occur individually participation between plans offering two funds and or in combination, and certain cues can signal those offering 59 options,7 despite the common situations that have a high likelihood of potential perception that the presence of more choices consumer inaction. enables a “just for me” fit. The cognitive work required to parse and compare large amounts of Analysis paralysis: “There are information quickly spirals into confusion that too many options, I just can’t diminishes consumers’ ability to choose,8 even when people fully recognize the importance of saving for decide.” retirement early. Decision paralysis brought on by the inability to choose between options is typically the result of Facing the uncertainty of the cognitive overload and fatigue. The human brain simply isn’t designed to process and compare the future: “I know I should . sheer amount of information it is often given. While but that can wait.” consumers say they want choices, the need to select between endless options can become a cognitive In addition to the mental exhaustion caused by jug- burden rather than a delight. Without ways to gling multiple complex options, saving for retire- mentally manage or weigh the value of information, ment faces a second challenge that encourages pa- people struggle to decide and freeze.4 ralysis: Outcomes set in the distant future typically lack a sense of urgency in contrast with everyday In his book, Paradox of Choice, Barry Schwartz ex- needs, making it easy to defer decision making to a plained how the proliferation of choice overwhelms tomorrow that never arrives. The human tendency consumers’ ability to process information, prevent- to overinflate the here and now, known as the pres- ing them from making smart decisions. Similarly, ent bias, makes us regularly tip the balance in favor Columbia Business School Professor Sheena Iyen- of choices that benefit us in the short term.9 gar’s jam experiment5—in which shoppers were of- fered either 6 or 24 varieties of jam for purchase— This form of paralysis arises from conflicting val- revealed that more choice actually resulted in fewer ues between peoples’ present and future selves, in sales by a ratio of nearly 8 to 1, as potential purchas- which “the now” is concrete, but the future is uncer- ers struggled to weigh one option against another tain and difficult to plan for. In the context of long- and bought nothing. This state of choice overload term planning, today’s consumer has well-defined 4 Using behavioral design to overcome decision-making paralysis preferences but little sense of—or even empathy The impact of emotion on for—what her 80-year-old self will need or want.10 Not surprisingly, then, situations in which people behavior: “I worry about face major decisions that have uncertain down- failure, and I hate feeling stream implications, like saving for retirement, are dumb.” ripe for paralysis.11 Consumers also hesitate when they fear or worry This uncertainty about the future is compounded about the possibility of making a bad decision. when people have little exposure to or practice with Given the high levels of risk or uncertainty making a decision. Cognitive research has shown involved, consumers find retirement planning to that people often learn and make decisions using be unpleasant, and are often fraught with anxiety “case-based reasoning”—solving problems by recall- rather than focused on the anticipatory pleasure of ing previous situations and reusing that information the unknown. This, coupled with the fact that people as fodder.12 With no personal experience, feedback, tend to avoid what makes them nervous, explains or a memory of past reference points, consumers why they put off even thinking about funding their feel ill-equipped to make the right call; even after post-employment years.
Recommended publications
  • PUBLIC WELFARE Targeting in Social Programs Avoiding Bad Bets
    Targeting in Social Programs Avoiding Bad Bets, Removing Bad Apples Peter H. Schuck & Richard J. Zeckhauser 00 7880-6 front.qxd 9/24/2006 2:00 PM Page i Targeting in Social Programs 00 7880-6 front.qxd 9/24/2006 2:00 PM Page ii 00 7880-6 front.qxd 9/24/2006 2:00 PM Page iii Targeting in Social Programs Avoiding Bad Bets, Removing Bad Apples Peter H. Schuck Richard J. Zeckhauser brookings institution press Washington, D.C. 00 7880-6 front.qxd 9/24/2006 2:00 PM Page iv ABOUT BROOKINGS The Brookings Institution is a private nonprofit organization devoted to research, educa- tion, and publication on important issues of domestic and foreign policy. Its principal purpose is to bring the highest quality independent research and analysis to bear on cur- rent and emerging policy problems. Interpretations or conclusions in Brookings publica- tions should be understood to be solely those of the authors. Copyright © 2006 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 www.brookings.edu All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Brookings Institution Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data Schuck, Peter H. Targeting in social programs : avoiding bad bets, removing bad apples / Peter H. Schuck, Richard J. Zeckhauser. p. cm. Summary: “Provides a framework for analyzing the challenges involved in defining bad bets and bad apples and discusses the safeguards that any classification process must pro- vide. Examines public schools, public housing, and medical care and proposes policy changes that could reduce the problems these two groups pose in social welfare pro- grams”—Provided by publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlawing Honest Graft
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYL\16-1\NYL106.txt unknown Seq: 1 28-MAR-13 9:53 OUTLAWING HONEST GRAFT Paul D. Brachman* The American public believes that Congress is dishonest and corrupt, and this perception was recently reinforced by reports that members of Congress were immune from insider trading laws. In response to the public backlash, and in an overwhelming display of bipartisanship, Congress passed the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012 (STOCK Act). The Act clarified that members of Congress are indeed subject to prohibitions on insider trading, and subjected congressional securities transactions to new and more rigorous disclosure requirements. Neverthe- less, some observers were disappointed with the strength of the STOCK Act, and there is also reason to fear that the Speech or Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution may frustrate most attempts to prosecute members of Congress for insider trading, despite the passage of the Act. This Note analyzes the merits of the STOCK Act as an enforcement mechanism and concludes that it is likely a mostly ineffective tool for com- bating congressional insider trading. This Note then asks whether the Act may have independent value because it addresses the appearance of con- gressional impropriety, or whether such appearances may be detrimental if the Act fails as an enforcement device. Finally, this Note suggests that in- creasing transparency, and requiring Congress to police its own corruption may be more attractive alternatives for combatting congressional insider trading. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 262 R I. THEY SEEN THEIR OPPORTUNITIES AND THEY TOOK ‘EM: ASSESSING THE PROBLEM OF CONGRESSIONAL INSIDER TRADING ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deaton Cartwright Rcts with ABSTRACT August 25
    Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials Angus Deaton and Nancy Cartwright Princeton University Durham University and UC San Diego This version, August 2016 We acknowledge helpful discussions with many people over the many years this paper has been in preparation. We would particularly like to note comments from seminar participants at Princeton, Columbia and Chicago, the CHESS research group at Durham, as well as discussions with Orley Ashenfelter, Anne Case, Nick Cowen, Hank Farber, Bo Honoré, and Julian Reiss. Ulrich Mueller had a major influence on shaping Section 1 of the paper. We have benefited from gen- erous comments on an earlier version by Tim Besley, Chris Blattman, Sylvain Chassang, Steven Durlauf, Jean Drèze, William Easterly, Jonathan Fuller, Lars Hansen, Jim Heckman, Jeff Hammer, Macartan Humphreys, Helen Milner, Suresh Naidu, Lant Pritchett, Dani Rodrik, Burt Singer, Richard Zeckhauser, and Steve Ziliak. Cartwright’s research for this paper has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No 667526 K4U). Deaton acknowledges financial support through the National Bureau of Economic Research, Grants 5R01AG040629-02 and P01 AG05842-14 and through Princeton University’s Roybal Center, Grant P30 AG024928. ABSTRACT RCTs are valuable tools whose use is spreading in economics and in other social sciences. They are seen as desirable aids in scientific discovery and for generating evidence for poli- cy. Yet some of the enthusiasm for RCTs appears to be based on misunderstandings: that randomization provides a fair test by equalizing everything but the treatment and so allows a precise estimate of the treatment alone; that randomization is required to solve selection problems; that lack of blinding does little to compromise inference; and that statistical in- ference in RCTs is straightforward, because it requires only the comparison of two means.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy and Choice: Public Finance Through the Lens of Behavioral
    advance Praise For POLICY and CHOICE Mullai Congdon • Kling “Policy and Choice is a must-read for students of public finance. If you want to learn N William J. Congdon is a research director in Traditional public ἀnance provides a powerful how the emerging field of behavioral economics can help lead to better policy, there is atha the Brookings Institution’s Economic Studies framework for policy analysis, but it relies on a nothing better.” program, where he studies how best to apply model of human behavior that the new science , Harvard University, former chairman of the President’s Council of N. GreGory MaNkiw N behavioral economics to public policy. Economic Advisers, and author of Principles of Economics of behavioral economics increasingly calls into question. In Policy and Choice economists Jeἀrey R. Kling is the associate director for William Congdon, Jeffrey Kling, and Sendhil economic analysis at the Congressional Budget “This fantastic volume will become the standard reference for those interested in understanding the impact of behavioral economics on government tax and spending Mullainathan argue that public ἀnance not only Office, where he contributes to all aspects of the POLICY policies. The authors take a stream of research which had highlighted particular can incorporate many lessons of behavioral eco- agency’s analytic work. He is a former deputy ‘nudges’ and turn it into a comprehensive framework for thinking about policy in a nomics but also can serve as a solid foundation director of Economic Studies at Brookings. more realistic world where psychology is incorporated into economic decisionmaking. from which to apply insights from psychology Sendhil Mullainathan is a professor of This excellent book will be widely used and cited.” to questions of economic policy.
    [Show full text]
  • 7421 Tables Overcoming the Odds
    Friday, March 28, 2014 Volume 57, Number 8 Daily Bulletin 57th Spring North American Bridge Championships [email protected] Editors: Brent Manley and Sue Munday Overcoming the odds Cayne routed in Richard Coren has had his photo on the front page of this paper a couple of times this week. He Vanderbilt, won the Platinum Pairs – the most prestigious pairs event on the ACBL calendar – playing with Bobby Monaco, Nickell Levin. He followed that with a win in the Mixed Pairs with Janice Seamon-Molson. Far more impressive cruise than his back-to-back North American wins, however, The team captained by Mark Gordon took an is his resilience in the battle with Crohn’s disease. early lead against the No. 6 seed, led by James Crohn’s is an immune-related type of Cayne, on the way to a 178-195 rout and a spot in inflammatory bowel disease. It has a genetic today’s quarterfinal round of the Vanderbilt Knockout component and can vary in severity. “Mine is bad,” Teams. says Coren. His brother, too, has the disease, although Other high seeds fared well, No. 1 Monaco his symptoms are milder. dispatching Robert Hollman 151-110. No. 2 Nick Coren was diagnosed with Crohn’s disease during Nickell trailed at the half but outscored Richard his second year in law school when he suffered an Schwartz 107-22 in the second half to advance. episode so debilitating that he had to drop out and No. 4 Martin Fleisher had it the easiest when their move back home to live with his parents.
    [Show full text]
  • Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis
    Ninth Annual Conference and Meeting Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis MARCH 15-17, 2017 THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MARVIN CENTER, WASHINGTON, D.C. SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS Indiana University #1 ranked MPA program (tied) out of 272 #1 Public Finance & Budgeting #1 Environmental Policy & Management #1 Nonprot Mangement #29,000 square feet of new space in SPEA’s new Paul H. O’Neill Graduate Center #32,000+ alumni #90 full-time members of a large and interdisciplinary faculty, including: John D. Graham, Dean David Good Kerry Krutilla Denvil Duncan spea.indiana.edu 2 Improving The Theory & Practice of Benefit-Cost Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS Sponsors......................................................................................................................4 Welcome Letter..........................................................................................................5 2017 Organizational Affiliates..................................................................................6 2017 Premium Members..........................................................................................7 Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis Overview............................................................8 SBCA Membership.....................................................................................................9 Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis Overview...........................................................10 Conference and Workshop Schedule – Overview...............................................13
    [Show full text]
  • NPR Spotlights Bridge
    Saturday, March 19, 2016 Volume 59, Number 9 Daily Bulletin 59th Spring North American Bridge Championships [email protected] Editors: Sue Munday and Brent Manley NPR spotlights bridge By Darbi Padbury Rather than get into the “nitty gritty” of bridge If the bar is more crowded than normal, it’s only and the NABC, Ahn Gray, news reporter for Reno then that I realize it must be a Friday, rather than Public Radio, the local NPR affiliate, wanted to tell Tuesday.” a story “about the devoted bridge fans.” – Oren Kriegel On Monday morning, some of the game’s most “For me, I think notable personalities and a couple of its rising stars the biggest appeal sat down to talk to it was that you with Gray. They never see it all, that described their love no matter how good Silodor Open Pairs winners: Jeff Meckstroth for the game and you get, there’s and Eric Rodwell. what motivates them always something to keep playing. new. I’ve been Meckstroth, Rodwell win “When I come playing seriously to a tournament, I for 30-plus years, win Silodor Open Pairs get sort of lost in and if I go and play Disappointed to have lost in the second round this world. I lose this afternoon, there of the Vanderbilt Knockout Teams, Jeff Meckstroth track of time and would be three or and Eric Rodwell took their frustration out on the often don’t even four bridge deals that I had never encountered field in the Silodor Open Pairs, winning the event know what day it is.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, December 3
    Tuesday, December 3, 2019 Volume 92, Number 5 Daily Bulletin 92nd Fall North American Bridge Championships [email protected] | Editors: Paul Linxwiler and Chip Dombrowski Weinstein wins Mitchell BAM Lopsided results in Howard Weinstein’s team had a Soloway Rd. of 16 Most of the matches in yesterday’s round in monster first final session to win the Soloway KO Teams featured blowouts, an unusual Mitchell Open BAM by nearly three outcome in a top-level event. boards. Weinstein played with Michael The top-seeded Warren Spector team had a fairly Becker, Bob Hamman, Peter Weichsel, even match against Daniel Korbel (No. 16) and Liam Milne and Andy Hung. company through the first three quarters of play, but No one was more surprised to learn Spector treated Korbel to a 55-9 pummeling in the last they’d won than Hung, who thought it set to win the match by 42 IMPs. was a three-day event and that they still Team Lavazza, the No. 2 seed, trailed No. 15 had a day to play, Becker said. Andrew Rosenthal for the entire match, and Rosenthal It’s the first NABC win for stayed in control to win 121-100, the closest match of Australians Milne, 31, and Hung, 32. the round. “It feels good,” Milne said. The No. 3 seed led by Nick Nickell stayed just “They played unbelievably,” out of reach of Hemant Lall’s squad, the No. 14 seed, Weichsel said of his young teammates. through the first three quarters, but as is their habit, Becker has now won this event the Nickell poured it on in the last set to win by 53 IMPs.
    [Show full text]
  • 15. Investing in the Unknown and Unknowable
    From: The Known, the Unknown, and the Unknowable in Financial Risk Management: Measurement and Theory Advancing Practice, Francis X. Diebold, Neil A. Doherty, Richard J. I N V EST I N GIN THE U N K NOW NAN DUN K NOW A B L E 305 Herring (eds.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010, 304-346. r I will sometimes discuss salient problems outside of finance, such as terrorist I i attacks, which are also unknown and unknowable. 15. Investing in the Unknown 1 ~ This essay takes no derivatives, and runs no regressions. 2 In short, it eschews ~I the normal tools of my profession. It represents a blend of insights derived from and Unknowable ,~{ reading academic works and from trying to teach their insights to others, and from lessons learned from direct and at-a-distance experiences with a number .~~~~";I'""~,,,* ~ .. ~ ~ ,. • '. < ... of successful investors in the uU world. To reassure my academic audience, '" ~ -, + ". '" • '" • I use footnotes where possible, though many refer to accessible internet ar­ RichardJ Zeckhauser ticles in preference to journals and books. 1hroughout this essay, you will find speculations and maxims, as seems called for by the topic. They are labeled in sequence. 1his informal approach seems appropriate given our present understanding of the topic. Initial beliefs about this topic are highly uncertain, or as statisti­ cians would phrase it: "Prior distributions are diffuse:' Given that, the judicious use of illustrations, and prudent attempts to provide taxonomies and sort tea leaves, can substantially hone our beliefs, that is, tighten our future predictions. Section 15.1 of this chapter talks about risk, uncertainty, and ignorance, the last carrying us beyond traditional discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • 504 January 2007
    THE INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE PRESS ASSOCIATION Editor: John Carruthers This Bulletin is published monthly and circulated to around 400 members of the International Bridge Press Association comprising the world’s leading journalists, authors and editors of news, b books and articles about contract bridge, with an estimated readership of some 200 million people BULLETIN who enjoy the most widely played of all card games. www.ibpa.com [email protected] No. 507 Year 2007 Date April 10 President: PATRICK D JOURDAIN 8 Felin Wen, Rhiwbina Cardiff CF14 6NW WALES UK (44) 29 2062 8839 email: [email protected] Chairman: PER E JANNERSTEN Banergatan 15 SE-752 37 Uppsala, SWEDEN The 2007 World Bridge Championships, comprising the Bermuda Bowl, Venice (46) 18 52 13 00 Cup, Seniors Bowl and Transnational Open Teams competitions, will take place email: [email protected] in Shanghai, China, 29 September to 13 October 2007. Executive Vice-President: JAN TOBIAS van CLEEFF The Bermuda Bowl is the symbol of world supremacy at bridge. It is awarded to Prinsegracht 28a the winner of the open teams competition among representatives of all WBF 2512 GA The Hague, NETHERLANDS geographical zones. Since its inauguration in 1950, the competition has been (31) 70 360 5902 email: [email protected] played 37 times. So far, the USA has been victorious 17 times, while their Euro- Organizational Vice-President: pean rival, Italy, has prevailed 14 times. The other titles were won by France DILIP GIDWANI (twice), Great Britain, Brazil, Iceland and The Netherlands. 401 Mariden, 16th Road Bandra West Mumbai 400 050 INDIA The Venice Cup is awarded to the winner of the zonal competition for women (91) 22 98205 47150 Fax: 22 26002241 players.
    [Show full text]
  • Spingold Schulte, Kniest Are Fast Pairs Champs Zeckhauser
    Saturday, July 21, 2012 Volume 84, Number 9 Daily Bulletin 84th North American Bridge Championships Editors: Brent Manley, Paul Linxwiler and Sue Munday Zeckhauser scores narrow Spingold semis: win in Mixed BAM Monaco vs. Cayne, Editor’s note: A late-night score correction reported by the Nickell vs. Gordon Zeckhauser squad — declared the winners of the Freeman The squads led by captains Pierre Zimmerman Mixed BAM last night — may (Monaco), James Cayne, Nick Nickell and Mark result in a different winner. See Gordon handily won their respective quarterfinal tomorrow’s Daily Bulletin for matches to advance to today’s semifinal round. details. The multi-national “Team Monaco” jumped The team captained by out to an early lead against Marty Fleisher’s squad Richard Zeckhauser won the in the first quarter, 65-12, and never relinquished Freeman Mixed Board-a-Match their advantage, winning the contest 145-104. Teams by the thin margin of After a roughly even first set, Cayne’s squad 0.41 in the four-session contest outscored Carolyn Lynch and company 76-13 in when they outscored the leaders the second quarter, effectively ending the match. in the event by a half board on Lynch gave up after the third set, and Cayne the last round. advanced 149-62. Zeckhauser, playing Gordon won the first segment of their with Debbie Rosenberg, Joel quarterfinal match against Mike Levine’s team by Wooldridge and Gabrielle They won the Freeman Mixed Board-a-Match Teams: Gabrielle 17 IMPs, and steadily increased their lead each Sherman, Joel Wooldridge, Debbie Rosenberg and Richard continued on page 7 quarter.
    [Show full text]
  • Allied Social Science Associations Program
    Allied Social Science Associations Program Philadelphia, PA January 3–5, 2014 Contract negotiations, management and meeting arrangements for ASSA meetings are conducted by the American Economic Association. Participants should be aware that the media has open access to all sessions and events at the meetings. i ASSA2014.indb 1 11/15/13 12:29 PM Thanks to the 2014 American Economic Association Program Committee Members William Nordhaus, Chair Joseph Altonji Alan Auerbach Abhijit Banerjee Nick Bloom Raquel Fernandez Amy Finkelstein Matthew Gentzkow Gita Gopinath Pete Klenow Jonathan Levin Ellen McGrattan Marc Melitz Paul Milgrom Monika Piazzesi Matthew Shapiro Catherine Wolfram Michael Woodford Cover Art—“Philadelphia in Early Fall” by Kevin Cahill. Kevin is a research economist with the Sloan Center on Aging and Work at Boston College and a managing editor at ECONorthwest in Boise, ID. Kevin invites you to visit his personal website at www.kcahillstudios.com. ii ASSA2014.indb 2 11/15/13 12:29 PM Contents General Information............................... iv ASSA Hotels ................................... viii Listing of Advertisers and Exhibitors ............... xxiii ASSA Executive Officers..........................xxv Summary of Sessions by Organization ............. xxviii Daily Program of Events ............................1 Program of Sessions Thursday, January 2 .........................29 Friday, January 3 ...........................30 Saturday, January 4 ........................136 Sunday, January 5 .........................254
    [Show full text]