Student Publications Student Scholarship Spring 2014 Facing the Apocalypse: Bomb Shelters and National Policy in Eisenhower’s Second Term Angela A. Badore Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship Part of the American Politics Commons, Defense and Security Studies Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, Military and Veterans Studies Commons, Military History Commons, Political History Commons, Science and Technology Policy Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Badore, Angela A., "Facing the Apocalypse: Bomb Shelters and National Policy in Eisenhower’s Second Term" (2014). Student Publications. 213. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/213 This is the author's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/ 213 This open access student research paper is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Facing the Apocalypse: Bomb Shelters and National Policy in Eisenhower’s Second Term Abstract This paper explores the issues of civilian defense from a federal perspective during Eisenhower’s second term, particularly focusing on the issue of bomb shelters during the period from 1956-1958. Despite widespread efforts to promote bomb shelters, or fallout shelters, during this period, no significant progress was made toward a federal program. By examining federal efforts such as the Holifield Committee, the Gaither Committee, Operation Alert, and the National Shelter Policy, this paper shows that efforts to set up shelter programs actually made the public and the Eisenhower administration less likely to trust such programs at all.