DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Interdisciplinary Paleoflood Approach to Assess Extreme Flood Potential

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Interdisciplinary Paleoflood Approach to Assess Extreme Flood Potential WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 36, NO. 10, PAGES 2957-2984, OCTOBER 2000 Regional interdisciplinary paleofiood approach to assess extreme flood potential Robert D. Jarrett U.S. GeologicalSurvey, Denver, Colorado Edward M. Tomlinson Applied Weather Associates,Monument, Colorado Abstract. In the past decade,there has been a growinginterest of dam safetyofficials to incorporatea risk-basedanalysis for design-floodhydrology. Extreme or rare floods,with probabilitiesin therange of about10 -3 to 10-7 chanceof occurrenceper year, are of continuinginterest to the hydrologicand engineeringcommunities for purposesof planningand designof structuressuch as dams [NationalResearch Council, 1988]. The National ResearchCouncil stressesthat as much information as possibleabout floods needsto be usedfor evaluationof the risk and consequencesof any decision.A regional interdisciplinarypaleoflood approach was developedto assistdam safetyofficials and floodplainmanagers in their assessmentsof the risk of large floods.The interdisciplinary componentsincluded documenting maximum paleofloods and a regionalanalyses of contemporaryextreme rainfall and flood data to complementa site-specificprobable maximumprecipitation study [Tomlinson and Solak, 1997]. The cost-effectiveapproach, which can be usedin many other hydrometeorologicsettings, was applied to Elkhead Reservoirin ElkheadCreek (531 km 2) in northwesternColorado; the regional study area Was10,900 km 2. Paleoflood data using bouldery flood deposits and noninundation surfaces for 88 streamswere used to documentmaximum flood dischargesthat have occurred during the Holocene.Several relative datingmethods were usedto determinethe age of paleoflooddeposits and noninundationsurfaces. No evidenceof substantialflooding was foundin thestudy area. The maximum paleoflood of 135m 3 s-1 for ElkheadCreek is about13% of thesite-specific probable maximum flood of 1020m 3 s-1. Flood-frequency relationsusing the expectedmoments algorithm, which better incorporatespaleoflood data, were developedto assessthe risk of extremefloods. Envelope curves encompassing maximumrainfall (181 sites)and floods(218 sites)were developedfor northwestern Coloradoto help define maximumcontemporary and Holoceneflooding in Elkhead Creek and in a regionalfrequency context. Study results for Elkhead Reservoirwere acceptedby the ColoradoState Engineerfor dam safetycertification. 1. Introduction tion of structures such as dams has included an estimate of the probablemaximum flood (PMF) [Cudworth,1989]. The PMF Worldwide,floods are amongthe mostdestructive events is an estimate of the maximum flood potential for a given related to meteorologicalprocesses. In the United Statesthe drainagebasin and is derivedfrom an analysisof the probable averageannual death toll of 125is accompaniedby about$2.4 maximum precipitation (PMP) [Cudworth,1989]. Prior to billion in damagesfrom floods [FederalEmergency Manage- about 1950, a variety of methods were used to obtain the ment Agency(FEMA), 1997]. Poor understandingof floods magnitudeof the designflood. The NRC [1988,1994] recog- contributesto unnecessaryloss of life and increasedflood nized (1) the limited hydroclimaticdata availableto estimate damagein somecases and, conversely,leads to costlyoverde- PMP/PMF values for mountain basins less than about 1050 sign of hydraulic structureslocated in floodplainsfor other km2, (2) thesubjectivity and variation of PMPestimates among situations[Jarrett, 1991, 1993; Baker, 1994]. Extreme or rare experiencedmeteorologists, (3) the critical need for regional floods,with probabilities in the rangeof about10 -3 to 10-7 chanceof occurrenceper year, are of continuinginterest to the analysesof extremeprecipitation and flooding, (4) theneed to use historicand paleoflooddata, and (5) the potentialuse of hydrologicand engineeringcommunities for purposesof plan- probability-basedmethods for providingan alternativeto the ning and designof structuressuch as dams[National Research PMP/PMF approach.In an evaluationof extreme floods and Council(NRC), 1988].However, estimating the magnitude and frequencyof extreme floods is difficult becauseof relatively the useof the PMF methodologyto estimatedesign floods, the short streamflow-gagingstation record lengths. InteragencyAdvisory Committee on WaterData [1986] raiseda For about the past 50 yearsthe designcriteria for construc- major concernabout PMFs being either dangerouslysmall or wastefullylarge, and they emphasizedthe importanceof accu- Copyright2000 by the AmericanGeophysical Union. rately estimatingthe risk of extremeflooding. Thus the objec- Paper number 2000WR900098. tive of a flood studyshould be to generateas much information 0043-1397/00/2000WR900098509.00 as practicableabout the flood potential at a site [NRC, 1988]. 2957 2958 JARRETT AND TOMLINSON: REGIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARY PALEOFLOOD METHOD The NRC stresses that this should be the basis for evaluation haveoccurred in the regionsince the generalizedhydrometeo- of the risk and consequencesof any decision. rology report was published.Site-specific hydrometeorologic Efforts have been made to assigna frequencyto the PMF, studiesare being conductedbecause dam safetyofficials rec- but they are subjective[Interagency Committee on WaterData, ognizethe difficultproblems inherent in PMP estimatesin the 1986;NRC, 1988]. There is disagreementabout the range of Rocky Mountains.Utilization of an interdisciplinaryregional frequencyfor the PMF and whether any frequencyshould be paleofloodstudy providesadditional supportinginformation assignedto a deterministicPMF estimate.Extensions of flood- for understandingthe magnitudeof the largestcontemporary frequencyrelations to rare floods(e.g., 10,000-yearrecurrence floodsand paleofloodswith estimatesof the PMF potentialfor interval) are tenuousfor short streamflowrecords but are a particularbasin. enhanced when paleoflood data are included in flood- frequencyanalysis [Kochel and Baker,1982; NRC, 1988;Jarrett, 1987; Jarrett and Costa, 1988; Levish et al., 1994; Ostenaaand 2. Background Levish,1995]. Jarrett and Costa[1988] proposed using regional Substantialuncertainty and controversyexists in estimating flood-frequencyestimates, w,hich incorporated paleoflood in- flood magnitudesand frequencies,particularly those of ex- formation, to estimate recurrence intervals for rare floods in- treme floods in the Rocky Mountains. This results from a cludingPMF values.These extensions provide an approachto misunderstandingof the complexhydrometeorological pro- place PMF estimatesin perspectivewith regionalgaged and cesses involved and a lack of data on extreme rainstorms and p•aleofloodestimates of flood potential [Jarrettand Costa, flooding.Jarrett [1993] made a systematicevaluation of flood- 881. frequencyestimates for 25 long-term streamflow-gagingsta- Paleofioodhydrology is the studyof past or ancientfloods tions throughoutColorado where publishedFederal Emer- [Baker,1987]. Kochel and Baker [1982],Gregory [1983],Baker et gencyManagement Agency (FEMA) floodplainreports, which al. [1988], Costa[1987c], Stedinger and Baker [1987],Stedinger were derivedby variousmethods, also were available.On av- and Cohn [1986],Hupp [1988], andJarrett [1987, 1990b,1991] erage,the publishedFEMA 100-yearflood is 35% greaterthan provide summariesof paleofioodhydrology. Although most the gaged100-year flood obtainedby fitting a log-Pearsontype studiesinvolve prehistoric floods, the methodologyis applica- III distribution to streamflow data for the 25 stations. Similar ble to historic or modern floods [Baker et al., 1988; Jarrett, differenceswere identifiedfor the 10-, 50-, and 500-yearfloods 1990b].Paleofiood studies provide important information that and demonstratethe needto improveflood-frequency estimates can be used in risk assessments and in the assessment of cli- usedfor floodplainmanagement and other usesin Colorado. matic changeon floodingand droughts[Jarrett, 1991]. Paleo- Interdisciplinaryflood researchin Colorado [Jarrettand flood data are particularlyuseful in providingupper limits of Costa, 1983, 1988; Jarrett, 1987, 1990a, b; Grimm, 1993; Pitlick, the largestfloods that have occurredin a river basinin long 1994; Waythomasand Jarrett, 1994; Pruess, 1996; Capesius, time spans[Jarrett, 1990b; Enzel et al., 1993]. 1996;Pruess et al., 1998;McKee and Doesken,1997] and in the A regionalinterdisciplinary paleoflood study was conducted Rocky Mountains [Hertz, 1991; Jarrett, 1993; Jensen,1995; in northwesternColorado (Figure 1) to help assessthe flood Buckley,1995; Eastwood, 1995; Brien, 1996; Parrerr, 1997, 1998] hydrologyfor Elkhead Reservoirin Elkhead Creek basinnear providesnew insight into the hydrometeorologyof extreme Craig. The objectiveof the paleofloodstudy was to estimate flooding in the Rocky Mountains. In an analysisof USGS prior maximumflooding during the Holocene from evidence streamflow-gagingstation and paleoflooddata in the Rocky preservedin the floodplain.The interdisciplinarycomponents Mountain region,which included stations in New Mexico,Col- included documentingmaximum paleofloodsand regional orado, Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana, envelope curvesof analysesof contemporary(---155 years in Colorado)extreme maximumunit discharges(maximum peak flow dividedby rainfall and flood data in and near Elkhead basin.The major drainagearea) and gageelevation identified elevation limits drainageswithin the regionalstudy area are the Yampa River for largeunit discharges[Jarrett, 1993]. In Coloradothe eleva- and White River basins.Hydroclimatic conditions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado a Users Guide to the Classification Project
    A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado A Users Guide to the Classification Project September 1, 1999 By Gwen Kittel, Erika VanWie, Mary Damm, Reneé Rondeau Steve Kettler, Amy McMullen and John Sanderson Clockwise from top: Conejos River, Conejos County, Populus angustifolia-Picea pungens/Alnus incana Riparian Woodland Flattop Wilderness, Garfield County, Carex aquatilis Riparian Herbaceous Vegetation South Platte River, Logan County, Populus deltoides/Carex lanuginosa Riparian Woodland California Park, Routt County, Salix boothii/Mesic Graminoids Riparian Shrubland Joe Wright Creek, Larimer County, Abies lasiocarpa-Picea engelmannii/Alnus incana Riparian Forest Dolores River, San Miguel County, Forestiera pubescens Riparian Shrubland Center Photo San Luis Valley, Saguache County, Juncus balticus Riparian Herbaceous Vegetation (Photography by Gwen Kittel) 2 Prepared by: Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Bldg. Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 [email protected] This report should be cited as follows: Kittel, Gwen, Erika VanWie, Mary Damm, Reneé Rondeau, Steve Kettler, Amy McMullen, and John Sanderson. 1999. A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado: User Guide to the Classification Project. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. 80523 For more information please contact: Colorado Natural Heritage Program, 254 General Service Building, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523. (970)
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I - Watershed Tables
    Appendix I - Watershed Tables An inventory of major disturbances, Watershed Disturbance Inventory, was completed for this plan revision. Disturbances have been identified and recorded by watershed. Road miles, timber harvest areas, and geologic hazards have been totaled using a Geographical Information System (GIS) to overlay watershed boundaries with these other layers. All disturbances identified have been totaled and for a total for each watershed calculated. The Forest Service recognizes that all disturbances have not been identified for this FEIS. For example, there are nonsystem travelways on the Forest that are not recorded in GIS. Because the plan revision is a large-scale, programmatic analysis, more detailed watershed analyses will be completed at the project level. These site-specific analyses will consider disturbances not covered during the forest plan revision. This appendix contains six tables and one map. They are: Figure l-1: Watersheds of Concern. This map identifies the locations of the watersheds of concern. Table I-1: Reference Stream Reaches. This lists the undisturbed reference stream reaches. This table is used to compare streams in areas of activity with a similar stream in an area with no activity to help determine if impacts are occurring (see water section in Chapter 3 for more detail). Table I-2: Watershed Health Assessment. This is the summary of disturbances and geologic hazard ratings for each watershed on the Forest. This table summarizes disturbances and categorizes watersheds into low, medium, or high "disturbance risk potential" categories. Table I-3: List of Watersheds of Concerns. This table lists watersheds and subwatersheds which have a high disturbance risk potential rating as identified in Table I-2.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 2012–5214
    Prepared in cooperation with Routt County, the Colorado Water Conservation Board, and the City of Steamboat Springs Water-Quality Assessment and Macroinvertebrate Data for the Upper Yampa River Watershed, Colorado, 1975 through 2009 Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5214 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER: Yampa River at Steamboat Springs, Colorado, looking downstream. Steamflow is an estimated 104 cubic feet per second. Photograph by Nancy J. Bauch, U.S. Geological Survey, taken February 10, 2011. Water-Quality Assessment and Macroinvertebrate Data for the Upper Yampa River Watershed, Colorado, 1975 through 2009 By Nancy J. Bauch, Jennifer L. Moore, Keelin R. Schaffrath, and Jean A. Dupree Prepared in cooperation with Routt County, the Colorado Water Conservation Board, and the City of Steamboat Springs Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5214 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Yampa River Basin Aquatic Wildlife Management Plan
    YAMPA RIVER BASIN AQUATIC WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PLAN October 2010 Colorado Division of Wildlife Aquatic Wildlife Section 6060 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80216 YAMP A RIVER BASIN AQUATIC WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL AND LOCATIONS Bill Atkinson, Aquatic Area Biologist, Upper Yampa River Drainage, Steamboat Springs F. Boyd Wright, Aquatic Area Biologist, Lower Yampa River Drainage, Meeker Jennifer Logan, Aquatic Wildlife Conservation Biologist, Glenwood Springs Sherman Hebein, Senior Aquatic Biologist, Grand Junction Plan Approved: »:: ock1<i-t..- .;2~(2£>/ rlich, State Aquatic Manager Date TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgments...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Purpose and Objectives .............................................................................................................................................. 16 Guidance from CDOW Policies, Regulations, Plans ................................................................................................. 17 CDOW Personnel by Fish Management Units .......................................................................................................... 19 Upper Yampa Basin Hydrounit Summary ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Yampa River Study
    Prepared in cooperation with Routt County, the Colorado Water Conservation Board, and the City of Steamboat Springs Water-Quality Assessment and Macroinvertebrate Data for the Upper Yampa River Watershed, Colorado, 1975 through 2009 Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5214 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER: Yampa River at Steamboat Springs, Colorado, looking downstream. Steamflow is an estimated 104 cubic feet per second. Photograph by Nancy J. Bauch, U.S. Geological Survey, taken February 10, 2011. Water-Quality Assessment and Macroinvertebrate Data for the Upper Yampa River Watershed, Colorado, 1975 through 2009 By Nancy J. Bauch, Jennifer L. Moore, Keelin R. Schaffrath, and Jean A. Dupree Prepared in cooperation with Routt County, the Colorado Water Conservation Board, and the City of Steamboat Springs Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5214 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Topographic Map Analysis of Mountain Passes Crossing The
    Journal of Geography and Geology; Vol. 12, No. 1; 2020 ISSN 1916-9779 E-ISSN 1916-9787 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Topographic Map Analysis of Mountain Passes Crossing the Continental Divide Between Colorado River Headwaters and North and South Platte River Headwaters to Test a New Geomorphology Paradigm, Colorado, USA Eric Clausen1 1 Jenkintown, PA, USA Correspondence: Eric Clausen, Jenkintown, PA 19046, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Received: January 20, 2020 Accepted: March 30, 2020 Online Published: April 24, 2020 doi:10.5539/jgg.v12n1p50 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jgg.v12n1p50 Abstract Detailed topographic maps are used to identify and briefly describe named (and a few unnamed) mountain passes crossing high elevation east-west continental divide segments encircling south- and southwest-oriented Colorado River headwaters and linking the Colorado River drainage basin (draining to the Pacific Ocean) with the North and South Platte River drainage basins (draining to the Platte, Missouri, and Mississippi Rivers and Gulf of Mexico). Previous researchers following commonly accepted geomorphology paradigm rules have not explained how most, if any of these mountain passes originated. A recently proposed geomorphology paradigm requires all Missouri River drainage basin valleys to have eroded headward across massive south- and southeast-oriented floods, which implies south- and southeast-oriented floods flowed from what are today north-oriented North Platte River headwaters across the continental divide, the present-day south- and southwest-oriented Colorado River headwaters valley, and then across what is now the continental divide a second time to reach east- and southeast- oriented South Platte River headwaters.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of the Yampa River Drainage System Moffat and Routt Co
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1969 A study of the stoneflies (Plecoptera) of the Yampa River Drainage System Moffat and Routt Co. Colorado Briant Richard Oblad The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Oblad, Briant Richard, "A study of the stoneflies (Plecoptera) of the Yampa River Drainage System Moffat and Routt Co. Colorado" (1969). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 6711. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/6711 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. êi Fish Creek Falls^ Steamboat Springs, Colorado A STUDY OF THE STONEFLIES (PLECOPTERA) OF THE YAMPA RIVER DRAINAGE SYSTEM, MOFFAT AND ROUTT CO., COLORADO By Briant R. Oblad B.A., University of Utah, 1967 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1969 Approved by : Chairman, Board Examiners Date UMI Number: EP37512 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]