DOCSLIB.ORG

USGS Yampa River Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
USGS Yampa River Study Prepared in cooperation with Routt County, the Colorado Water Conservation Board, and the City of Steamboat Springs Water-Quality Assessment and Macroinvertebrate Data for the Upper Yampa River Watershed, Colorado, 1975 through 2009 Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5214 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER: Yampa River at Steamboat Springs, Colorado, looking downstream. Steamflow is an estimated 104 cubic feet per second. Photograph by Nancy J. Bauch, U.S. Geological Survey, taken February 10, 2011. Water-Quality Assessment and Macroinvertebrate Data for the Upper Yampa River Watershed, Colorado, 1975 through 2009 By Nancy J. Bauch, Jennifer L. Moore, Keelin R. Schaffrath, and Jean A. Dupree Prepared in cooperation with Routt County, the Colorado Water Conservation Board, and the City of Steamboat Springs Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5214 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Bauch, N.J., Moore, J.L., Schaffrath, K.R., and Dupree, J.A., 2012, Water-quality assessment and macroinvertebrate data for the Upper Yampa River watershed, Colorado, 1975 through 2009: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5214, 129 p. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose and Scope ..............................................................................................................................4 Study Area..............................................................................................................................................4 Hydrology and Water Resources ..............................................................................................6 Geology ..........................................................................................................................................9 Methods of Data Compilation, Review, and Analysis ..............................................................................9 Data Sources and Water-Quality Database ...................................................................................11 Data Quality Assurance .....................................................................................................................11 Data Aggregation ................................................................................................................................13 Censored Values .................................................................................................................................13 Water-Quality Standards ...................................................................................................................16 Temporal Trend Analysis ...................................................................................................................17 Water-Quality Assessment .........................................................................................................................18 Streams.................................................................................................................................................18 Physical Properties ...................................................................................................................18 Dissolved Solids and Major Ions .............................................................................................38 Nutrients ......................................................................................................................................41 Trace Elements and Uranium ...................................................................................................45 Coliform Bacteria .......................................................................................................................55 Suspended Sediment ................................................................................................................55 Lakes and Reservoirs .........................................................................................................................56 Groundwater ........................................................................................................................................61 Physical Properties ...................................................................................................................61 Dissolved Solids and Majors Ions ...........................................................................................67 Nutrients ......................................................................................................................................73 Trace Elements ...........................................................................................................................76 Macroinvertebrate Data .............................................................................................................................83 Synthesis of Water-Quality Data in the Upper Yampa River Watershed ............................................85 Summary........................................................................................................................................................87 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................90 References Cited..........................................................................................................................................91 Appendix 1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency STORET edit-checking procedure of low and high values for selected water-quality properties and constituents from the Upper Yampa River watershed water-quality database. ..................................................95 Appendix 2. Selected Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment in-stream water-quality standards for stream segments in the Upper Yampa River watershed, Colorado. ..........................................................................................................................................97 Appendix 3. Description of selected stream sampling sites in the Upper Yampa River watershed, Colorado, with type of water-quality data collected, period of water- quality record, and number of samples collected, 1975 through 2009.. ..............................100 Appendix 4. Description of selected lake and reservoir sampling sites in the Upper Yampa River watershed, Colorado, with type of water-quality data collected, period of water-quality record, and number of sample days, 1985 through 2009... ............................110 iv Appendix 5. Description of selected groundwater sampling sites in the Upper Yampa River watershed, Colorado, with geologic unit description, type of water- quality data collected, period of water-quality record, number of samples collected, and constituents with exceedances of Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment water-quality standards for groundwater, 1975 through 1989 and 1998.... ............................................................................................................................112 Appendix 6. Description of stream sites in the Upper Yampa River watershed, Colorado, that have macroinvertebrate data, and period of water-quality record and number of sample days, 1975 through 2008 ............................................................................................126 Figures 1. Location of the Upper Yampa River watershed, Colorado .....................................................3 2. Land cover in the Upper Yampa River watershed, Colorado, 2001 .......................................5 3. Location of selected stream-water sampling sites and active, water year 2010, streamgage stations, Upper Yampa River watershed, Colorado ..........................................7 4. Mean monthly streamflow for 2005 through 2008 for selected streamgage stations in the Upper Yampa River watershed, Colorado ......................................................9 5. Geology of the Upper Yampa River watershed, Colorado ....................................................11 6. Distribution of specific conductance, pH, acid neutralizing capacity, and concentrations of dissolved sulfate and dissolved manganese in stream water, by subwatershed, Upper Yampa River watershed, Colorado,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado a Users Guide to the Classification Project
    A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado A Users Guide to the Classification Project September 1, 1999 By Gwen Kittel, Erika VanWie, Mary Damm, Reneé Rondeau Steve Kettler, Amy McMullen and John Sanderson Clockwise from top: Conejos River, Conejos County, Populus angustifolia-Picea pungens/Alnus incana Riparian Woodland Flattop Wilderness, Garfield County, Carex aquatilis Riparian Herbaceous Vegetation South Platte River, Logan County, Populus deltoides/Carex lanuginosa Riparian Woodland California Park, Routt County, Salix boothii/Mesic Graminoids Riparian Shrubland Joe Wright Creek, Larimer County, Abies lasiocarpa-Picea engelmannii/Alnus incana Riparian Forest Dolores River, San Miguel County, Forestiera pubescens Riparian Shrubland Center Photo San Luis Valley, Saguache County, Juncus balticus Riparian Herbaceous Vegetation (Photography by Gwen Kittel) 2 Prepared by: Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Bldg. Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 [email protected] This report should be cited as follows: Kittel, Gwen, Erika VanWie, Mary Damm, Reneé Rondeau, Steve Kettler, Amy McMullen, and John Sanderson. 1999. A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado: User Guide to the Classification Project. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. 80523 For more information please contact: Colorado Natural Heritage Program, 254 General Service Building, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523. (970)
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Predatory and Energetic Relations of Woodpeckers to the Engela~N
    DISSERTATION PREDATORY AND ENERGETIC RELATIONS OF WOODPECKERS TO THE ENGELA~N SPRUCE BEETLE Submitted by James Ray Koplin In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado June, 1967 COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY June 1967 IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE DISSERTATION PREPARED BY ---- JAMES RAY KOPLIN ENTITLED PREDATORY AND ENERGETIC RELATIONS OF V\UODPECKERS TO THE ENGELMANN SPRUCE BEETLE BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIRE~ffiNT FOR THE DEGREE OF OOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY. Committee £Q Graduate Work Major Professor Examination Satisfactory Chairman Permission to publish this dissertation or any part of it must be obtained from the Dean of the Graduate School. ii Abstract of Dissertation PREDATORY AND ENERGETIC RELATIONS OF WOODPECKERS TO THE ENGELMANN SPRUCE BEETLE A general theory of the population dynamics of predator­ prey systems was developed from a survey of pertinent literature. According to the theory, populations of simplified predator-prey systems fluctuate wildly and periodically. Complicating factors dampen the amplitude of the population fluctuations and thus exert a stabilizing influence on the systems. The predator-prey system between the Northern Three-toed, Hairy and Downy Woodpeckers, and the Engelmann spruce beetle was chosen for an investigation of the population dynamics of a natural predator-prey system. The population densities of several species of bark beetles attracted to trees killed and damaged by a fire on the study area in Northern Colorado, increased to levels that attracted the feeding attention of the woodpeckers. The numerical response of the woodpeckers to prey density was graded, that of the Northern Three-toed Woodpecker was the most pronounced and that of the Downy Woodpecker was the least pronounced.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I - Watershed Tables
    Appendix I - Watershed Tables An inventory of major disturbances, Watershed Disturbance Inventory, was completed for this plan revision. Disturbances have been identified and recorded by watershed. Road miles, timber harvest areas, and geologic hazards have been totaled using a Geographical Information System (GIS) to overlay watershed boundaries with these other layers. All disturbances identified have been totaled and for a total for each watershed calculated. The Forest Service recognizes that all disturbances have not been identified for this FEIS. For example, there are nonsystem travelways on the Forest that are not recorded in GIS. Because the plan revision is a large-scale, programmatic analysis, more detailed watershed analyses will be completed at the project level. These site-specific analyses will consider disturbances not covered during the forest plan revision. This appendix contains six tables and one map. They are: Figure l-1: Watersheds of Concern. This map identifies the locations of the watersheds of concern. Table I-1: Reference Stream Reaches. This lists the undisturbed reference stream reaches. This table is used to compare streams in areas of activity with a similar stream in an area with no activity to help determine if impacts are occurring (see water section in Chapter 3 for more detail). Table I-2: Watershed Health Assessment. This is the summary of disturbances and geologic hazard ratings for each watershed on the Forest. This table summarizes disturbances and categorizes watersheds into low, medium, or high "disturbance risk potential" categories. Table I-3: List of Watersheds of Concerns. This table lists watersheds and subwatersheds which have a high disturbance risk potential rating as identified in Table I-2.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C - Roadless Areas
    Appendix C - Roadless Areas Purpose The purpose of this appendix is to describe roadless areas and the analysis factors used in evaluating individual roadless areas on the Routt National Forest. It includes a description of the physical and biological features, primitive recreation and education opportunities, resources, and present management situation for each area. Background Roadless Area Review and Evaluation In 1970, the Forest Service studied all administratively designated primitive areas and inventoried and reviewed all roadless areas in the National Forest System greater than 5,000 acres. This study was known as the Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE). RARE was halted in 1972 due to legal challenge. RARE identified 711,043 acres of roadless area on the Routt National Forest. In 1977, the Forest Service began another nation-wide Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) to identify roadless and undeveloped areas within the National Forest System that were suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. Twenty nine areas, totalling 566,756 acres, were inventoried on the Routt National Forest (including the Middle Park Ranger District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest). As a result of RARE II, four areas on the forest - Williams Fork, St. Louis Peak, Service Creek, and Davis Peak - were administratively designated as Further Planning Areas (FPA). This further planning area designation meant that more information was needed before the Forest Service would recommend any of these areas to Congress for wilderness designation. In January 1979, the Forest Service issued nationally a Final Environmental Impact Statement documenting a review of 62 million acres of roadless and undeveloped areas within the 191-million-acre National Forest System.
    [Show full text]
  • Boreal Toad (Bufo Boreas Boreas) a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Boreal Toad (Bufo boreas boreas) A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project May 25, 2005 Doug Keinath1 and Matt McGee1 with assistance from Lauren Livo2 1Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, P.O. Box 3381, Laramie, WY 82071 2EPO Biology, P.O. Box 0334, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Keinath, D. and M. McGee. (2005, May 25). Boreal Toad (Bufo boreas boreas): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/ assessments/borealtoad.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Deb Patla and Erin Muths for their suggestions during the preparation of this assessment. Also, many thanks go to Lauren Livo for advice and help with revising early drafts of this assessment. Thanks to Jason Bennet and Tessa Dutcher for assistance in preparing boreal toad location data for mapping. Thanks to Bill Turner for information and advice on amphibians in Wyoming. Finally, thanks to the Boreal Toad Recovery Team for continuing their efforts to conserve the boreal toad and documenting that effort to the best of their abilities … kudos! AUTHORS’ BIOGRAPHIES Doug Keinath is the Zoology Program Manager for the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, which is a research unit of the University of Wyoming and a member of the Natural Heritage Network. He has been researching Wyoming’s wildlife for the past nine years and has 11 years experience in conducting technical and policy analyses for resource management professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain Birds: Birds and Birding in the Central and Northern Rockies
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Zea E-Books Zea E-Books 11-4-2011 Rocky Mountain Birds: Birds and Birding in the Central and Northern Rockies Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Poultry or Avian Science Commons Recommended Citation Johnsgard, Paul A., "Rocky Mountain Birds: Birds and Birding in the Central and Northern Rockies" (2011). Zea E-Books. 7. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook/7 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Zea E-Books at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Zea E-Books by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRDS Rocky Mountain Birds Birds and Birding in the Central and Northern Rockies Paul A. Johnsgard School of Biological Sciences University of Nebraska–Lincoln Zea E-Books Lincoln, Nebraska 2011 Copyright © 2011 Paul A. Johnsgard. ISBN 978-1-60962-016-5 paperback ISBN 978-1-60962-017-2 e-book Set in Zapf Elliptical types. Design and composition by Paul Royster. Zea E-Books are published by the University of Nebraska–Lincoln Libraries. Electronic (pdf) edition available online at http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook/ Print edition can be ordered from http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/unllib Contents Preface and Acknowledgments vii List of Maps, Tables, and Figures x 1. Habitats, Ecology and Bird Geography in the Rocky Mountains Vegetational Zones and Bird Distributions in the Rocky Mountains 1 Climate, Landforms, and Vegetation 3 Typical Birds of Rocky Mountain Habitats 13 Recent Changes in Rocky Mountain Ecology and Avifauna 20 Where to Search for Specific Rocky Mountain Birds 26 Synopsis of Major Birding Locations in the Rocky Mountains Region U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Geologic Resources Division Denver, Colorado Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Geologic Resources Division Denver, Colorado U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 Dedication and Acknowledgements............................................................................ 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose of the Geologic Resource Evaluation Program ............................................................................................3 Geologic Setting .........................................................................................................................................................3 Geologic Issues............................................................................................................. 5 Alpine Environments...................................................................................................................................................5 Flooding......................................................................................................................................................................5 Hydrogeology .............................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Report 2012–5214
    Prepared in cooperation with Routt County, the Colorado Water Conservation Board, and the City of Steamboat Springs Water-Quality Assessment and Macroinvertebrate Data for the Upper Yampa River Watershed, Colorado, 1975 through 2009 Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5214 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER: Yampa River at Steamboat Springs, Colorado, looking downstream. Steamflow is an estimated 104 cubic feet per second. Photograph by Nancy J. Bauch, U.S. Geological Survey, taken February 10, 2011. Water-Quality Assessment and Macroinvertebrate Data for the Upper Yampa River Watershed, Colorado, 1975 through 2009 By Nancy J. Bauch, Jennifer L. Moore, Keelin R. Schaffrath, and Jean A. Dupree Prepared in cooperation with Routt County, the Colorado Water Conservation Board, and the City of Steamboat Springs Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5214 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Linkchapter
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abajo Mountains, 382, 388 Amargosa River, 285, 309, 311, 322, Arkansas River, 443, 456, 461, 515, Abort Lake, 283 337, 341, 342 516, 521, 540, 541, 550, 556, Abies, 21, 25 Amarillo, Texas, 482 559, 560, 561 Abra, 587 Amarillo-Wichita uplift, 504, 507, Arkansas River valley, 512, 531, 540 Absaroka Range, 409 508 Arlington volcanic field, 358 Acer, 21, 23, 24 Amasas Back, 387 Aromas dune field, 181 Acoma-Zuni scction, 374, 379, 391 Ambrose tenace, 522, 523 Aromas Red Sand, 180 stream evolution patterns, 391 Ambrosia, 21, 24 Arroyo Colorado, 395 Aden Crater, 368 American Falls Lava Beds, 275, 276 Arroyo Seco unit, 176 Afton Canyon, 334, 341 American Falls Reservoir, 275, 276 Artemisia, 21, 24 Afton interglacial age, 29 American River, 36, 165, 173 Ascension Parish, Louisana, 567 aggradation, 167, 176, 182, 226, 237, amino acid ash, 81, 118, 134, 244, 430 323, 336, 355, 357, 390, 413, geochronology, 65, 68 basaltic, 85 443, 451, 552, 613 ratios, 65 beds, 127,129 glaciofluvial, 423 aminostratigraphy, 66 clays, 451 Piedmont, 345 Amity area, 162 clouds, 95 aggregate, 181 Anadara, 587 flows, 75, 121 discharge, 277 Anastasia Formation, 602, 642, 647 layer, 10, 117 Agua Fria Peak area, 489 Anastasia Island, 602 rhyolitic, 170 Agua Fria River, 357 Anchor Silt, 188, 198, 199 volcanic, 54, 85, 98, 117, 129, Airport bench, 421, 423 Anderson coal, 448 243, 276, 295, 396, 409, 412, Alabama coastal plain, 594 Anderson Pond, 617, 618 509, 520 Alamosa Basin, 366 andesite, 75, 80, 489 Ash Flat, 364 Alamosa
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resources Evaluation
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2004/004 THIS PAGE: Ypsilon Mountain, Rocky Mountain NP. ON THE COVER: Alpine Tundra looking west to the Never Summer Range, Rocky Mountain NP Photos by: NPS and Josh Heise Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2004/004 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 September 2004 U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. Examples of the diverse array of reports published in this series include vital signs monitoring plans; "how to" resource management papers; proceedings of resource management workshops or conferences; annual reports of resource programs or divisions of the Natural Resource Program Center; resource action plans; fact sheets; and regularly-published newsletters.
    [Show full text]
  • What's New in Steamboat Springs, Colorado 2019 Welcoming (And
    What’s New in Steamboat Springs, Colorado 2019 Welcoming (and Rewarding) CDT Hikers The Continental Divide Trail Coalition (CDTC) recently named Steamboat Springs a Continental Divide Trail (CDT) Gateway Community. Gateway Communities are recognized for their part in promoting awareness and stewardship of the CDT and creating a welcoming environment for people traveling along the Trail. In that spirit, the Steamboat Springs Chamber has joined with several local trail advocacy groups, the U.S. Forest Service and locally-based brands Big Agnes and Point6 to champion the designation and provide a welcome bag for thru-hikers who will pass through Steamboat Springs, including a pair of Point6 socks, Big Agnes swag, a free pint of beer at Mountain Tap, discounted entry to Old Town Hot Springs and more. Big Agnes announced in January it will donate $30,000 to the CDTC to help reroute a 14-mile section of the trail from a busy road to single track along Highways 14 and 40 near Rabbit Ears Pass. Taking it to the Gravel: SBT GRVL SBT GRVL, Colorado’s first large-scale gravel cycling event, will host its inaugural race August 18, 2019. The race is the first of its kind in Colorado and its $28,000 prize purse will be equally divided among male and female athletes. The race will take place on the many miles of unpaved roads surrounding Steamboat, weaving through historic ranch lands and western landscapes. Art Along the Yampa Local artists and outdoor enthusiasts have joined together to create the Yampa is Wild mural project, the latest art installation along the Yampa River in Steamboat.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rootless Rockies—Support and Lithospheric Structure of the Colorado Rocky Mountains Inferred from CREST and TA Seismic Data
    Article Volume 14, Number 8 6 August 2013 doi: 10.1002/ggge.20143 ISSN: 1525-2027 A rootless rockies—Support and lithospheric structure of the Colorado Rocky Mountains inferred from CREST and TA seismic data Steven M. Hansen and Ken G. Dueker Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA Now at Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA ([email protected]) Josh C. Stachnik Earth and Environmental Sciences Department, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania,USA Richard C. Aster Geophysical Research Center and Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico, USA Karl E. Karlstrom Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA [1] Support for the Colorado high topography is resolved using seismic data from the Colorado Rocky Mountain (CRM) Experiment and Seismic Transects. The average crustal thickness, derived from P wave receiver function imaging, is 48 km. However, a negative correlation between Moho depth and elevation is observed, which negates Airy-Heiskanen isostasy. Shallow Moho (<45 km depth) is found beneath some of the highest elevations, and therefore, the CRM are rootless. Deep Moho (45–51 km) regions indicate structure inherited from the Proterozoic assembly of the continent. Shear wave velocities from surface wave tomography are mapped to density employing empirical velocity-to-density relations in the crust and mantle temperature modeling. Predicted elastic plate flexure and gravity fields derived from the density model agree with observed long-wavelength topography and Bouguer gravity.
    [Show full text]