DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 Annual Compliance Report for Biodiversity Offset & Cliffline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014 Annual Compliance Report for Biodiversity Offset & Cliffline 2014 Annual Compliance Report for Biodiversity Offset & Cliffline Management Areas (EPBC ref 2009/5252) Prepared for Ulan Coal Mines Limited 13 February 2015 2014 Annual Compliance Report (EPBC ref 2009/5252) 2014 Annual Compliance Report for Biodiversity Offset & Cliffline Management Areas EPBC ref 2009/5252 PREPARED FOR Ulan Coal Mines Limited PROJECT NO 742 DATE 13 February 2015 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA P T Y L T D ii 2014 Annual Compliance Report (EPBC ref 2009/5252) DOCUMENT TRACKING ITEM DETAIL Project Name 2014 UCML EPBC Compliance Report Project Number 742 File location W:\Projects\Mudgee\13MUDECO\13MUDECO-0038 UCML Floristic Monitoring Spring 2013 Prepared by Rachel Murray, Sarah Dickson-Hoyle, Kurtis Lindsay Approved by Dr Paul Frazier Status Final Version Number v1 Last saved on 13 February 2015 Flora monitoring sites BOB14, BOBE1 and RPA9 (Tammy Paartalu, ELA 2011) and Harp Cover photo trap along cliffline at BOB1 (Glenn Hoye, Fly By Night Bat Surveys 2011) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with input from Glenn Hoye (Fly By Night Bat Surveys Pty Ltd) and Dr Martin Denny (Biodiversity Monitoring Services) and support from Ulan Coal Mines Limited. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and the Ulan Coal Mines Limited. The scope of services was defined in consultation with Ulan Coal Mines Limited, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Unauthorised use of this report in any form is prohibited. © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA P T Y L T D i 2014 Annual Compliance Report (EPBC ref 2009/5252) Contents Contents .....................................................................................................................................................ii List of Figures............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................vi Abbreviations............................................................................................................................................vii 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Area ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 EPBC Conditions & Compliance ............................................................................................. 4 2.1 EPBC Conditions of Approval.................................................................................................. 4 2.2 EPBC Compliance................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Condition 1 ......................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.2 Condition 2 – Variation to Conditions Attached to Approval (23 July 2014) ...................... 9 2.2.3 Condition 3 ......................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.4 Condition 4 – Variation to Conditions Attached to Approval (23 July 2014) .................... 16 2.2.5 Condition 5 ....................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.6 Condition 6 ....................................................................................................................... 17 2.2.7 Condition 7 ....................................................................................................................... 17 2.2.8 Condition 8 ....................................................................................................................... 18 2.2.9 Condition 9 ....................................................................................................................... 18 2.2.10 Condition 10 ..................................................................................................................... 18 3 Biodiversity Offset & Cliffline Management Areas................................................................. 19 3.1 Biodiversity Management Plan .............................................................................................. 19 3.1.1 Biodiversity Offsets........................................................................................................... 19 3.1.2 Biodiversity Offset and Cliffline Management Area Objectives........................................ 20 3.1.3 Monitoring......................................................................................................................... 21 4 Biodiversity Offset and Cliffline Management Area Monitoring ............................................. 24 4.1 Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 24 4.1.1 Floristic Monitoring Methodology ..................................................................................... 24 4.1.1.1 Residual Vegetation Monitoring (Analogue Sites) ........................................................... 25 4.1.1.2 Revegetation/Regeneration Area Vegetation Monitoring................................................. 27 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA P T Y L T D ii 2014 Annual Compliance Report (EPBC ref 2009/5252) 4.1.2 Landscape Function Analysis Methodology..................................................................... 29 4.1.2.1 Geographic Setting of the Site ......................................................................................... 31 4.1.2.2 Landscape Organisation .................................................................................................. 31 4.1.2.3 Soil Surface Assessment ................................................................................................. 32 4.1.2.4 Vegetation Dynamics ....................................................................................................... 32 4.1.3 Fauna (excluding Microbats)............................................................................................ 33 4.1.4 Fauna (Microbats) ............................................................................................................ 38 4.1.4.1 General Fauna Monitoring Sites ...................................................................................... 38 4.1.4.2 Targeted Cliffline Microbat Monitoring ............................................................................. 38 4.1.5 Weather Conditions.......................................................................................................... 40 4.2 Results................................................................................................................................... 43 4.2.1 Floristic Surveys ............................................................................................................... 43 4.2.2 Landscape Function Analysis .......................................................................................... 51 4.2.3 Fauna (excluding Microbats)............................................................................................ 53 4.2.3.1 Mammals (excluding Microbats) ...................................................................................... 54 4.2.3.2 Birds ................................................................................................................................. 54 4.2.3.3 Reptiles ............................................................................................................................ 56 4.2.3.4 Amphibians....................................................................................................................... 56 4.2.3.5 Fauna Habitat................................................................................................................... 56 4.2.4 Fauna (Microbats) ............................................................................................................ 57 4.2.4.1 General Fauna Sites ........................................................................................................ 57 4.2.4.2 Targeted Microbat Cliffline Monitoring ............................................................................. 57 5 Discussion & Recommendations........................................................................................... 59 5.1 Floristic Monitoring................................................................................................................. 59 5.2 Landscape Function Analysis................................................................................................ 62 5.3 Fauna (excluding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids
    Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids by Karen A. Johnson BSc (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania February 2012 ii Declaration of originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Karen A. Johnson Statement of authority of access This thesis may be made available for copying. Copying of any part of this thesis is prohibited for two years from the date this statement was signed; after that time limited copying is permitted in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Karen A. Johnson iii iv Abstract Relationships between plants and their pollinators are thought to have played a major role in the morphological diversification of angiosperms. The epacrids (subfamily Styphelioideae) comprise more than 550 species of woody plants ranging from small prostrate shrubs to temperate rainforest emergents. Their range extends from SE Asia through Oceania to Tierra del Fuego with their highest diversity in Australia. The overall aim of the thesis is to determine the relationships between epacrid floral features and potential pollinators, and assess the evolutionary status of any pollination syndromes. The main hypotheses were that flower characteristics relate to pollinators in predictable ways; and that there is convergent evolution in the development of pollination syndromes.
    [Show full text]
  • Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar Site: Ecological Character Description in Good Faith, Exercising All Due Care and Attention
    Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar site Ecological character description Disclaimer The Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW (DECCW) has compiled the Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar site: Ecological character description in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. DECCW does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or of the Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts. Acknowledgements Phil Straw, Australasian Wader Studies Group; Bob Creese, Bruce Pease, Trudy Walford and Rob Williams, Department of Primary Industries (NSW); Simon Annabel and Rob Lea, NSW Maritime; Geoff Doret, Ian Drinnan and Brendan Graham, Sutherland Shire Council; John Dahlenburg, Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority. Symbols for conceptual diagrams are courtesy of the Integration and Application Network (ian.umces.edu/symbols), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. This publication has been prepared with funding provided by the Australian Government to the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority through the Coastal Catchments Initiative Program. © State of NSW, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW, and Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority DECCW and SMCMA are pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1770 Landscape of Botany Bay, the Plants Collected by Banks and Solander and Rehabilitation of Natural Vegetation at Kurnell
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Hochschulschriftenserver - Universität Frankfurt am Main Backdrop to encounter: the 1770 landscape of Botany Bay, the plants collected by Banks and Solander and rehabilitation of natural vegetation at Kurnell Doug Benson1 and Georgina Eldershaw2 1Botanic Gardens Trust, Mrs Macquaries Rd Sydney 2000 AUSTRALIA email [email protected] 2Parks & Wildlife Division, Dept of Environment and Conservation (NSW), PO Box 375 Kurnell NSW 2231 AUSTRALIA email [email protected] Abstract: The first scientific observations on the flora of eastern Australia were made at Botany Bay in April–May 1770. We discuss the landscapes of Botany Bay and particularly of the historic landing place at Kurnell (lat 34˚ 00’ S, long 151˚ 13’ E) (about 16 km south of central Sydney), as described in the journals of Lieutenant James Cook and Joseph Banks on the Endeavour voyage in 1770. We list 132 plant species that were collected at Botany Bay by Banks and Daniel Solander, the first scientific collections of Australian flora. The list is based on a critical assessment of unpublished lists compiled by authors who had access to the collection of the British Museum (now Natural History Museum), together with species from material at National Herbarium of New South Wales that has not been previously available. The list includes Bidens pilosa which has been previously regarded as an introduced species. In 1770 the Europeans set foot on Aboriginal land of the Dharawal people. Since that time the landscape has been altered in response to a succession of different land-uses; farming and grazing, commemorative tree planting, parkland planting, and pleasure ground and tourist visitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright and Use of This Thesis This Thesis Must Be Used in Accordance with the Provisions of the Copyright Act 1968
    COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS THESIS This thesis must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction of material protected by copyright may be an infringement of copyright and copyright owners may be entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. Section 51 (2) of the Copyright Act permits an authorized officer of a university library or archives to provide a copy (by communication or otherwise) of an unpublished thesis kept in the library or archives, to a person who satisfies the authorized officer that he or she requires the reproduction for the purposes of research or study. The Copyright Act grants the creator of a work a number of moral rights, specifically the right of attribution, the right against false attribution and the right of integrity. You may infringe the author’s moral rights if you: - fail to acknowledge the author of this thesis if you quote sections from the work - attribute this thesis to another author - subject this thesis to derogatory treatment which may prejudice the author’s reputation For further information contact the University’s Director of Copyright Services sydney.edu.au/copyright QUANTIFICATION OF THE RISK OF PHYTOPHTHORA DIEBACK IN THE GREATER BLUE MOUNTAINS WORLD HERITAGE AREA Zoe-Joy Newby A dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney February, 2014 1 Declaration of Originality This dissertation presents the results of research conducted at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, of the Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust and the Faulty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • 3-2-Effects-Of-Fire-Regime-On-Plant
    Foster, C. N., Barton, P. S., MacGregor, C. I., Catford, J. A., Blanchard, W., & Lindenmayer, D. B. Effects of fire regime on plant species richness and composition differ among forest, woodland and heath vegetation. Applied Vegetation Science, 21(1): 132-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12345 Page 1 of 29 Applied Vegetation Science EFFECTS OF FIRE REGIME ON PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS AND COMPOSITION DIFFER AMONG FOREST, WOODLAND AND HEATH VEGETATION Foster, C.N. (corresponding author, [email protected])1,2 Barton, P.S. ([email protected])1 MacGregor, C.I. ([email protected])1,2,3 Catford, J.A. ([email protected])1,2,4,5 Blanchard, W. ([email protected]) 1 Lindenmayer, D.B. ([email protected]) 1,2,3 1 Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia 2Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia 3The National Environmental Science Program, Threatened Species Recovery Hub and the Long-term Ecological Research Network, Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia 4School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, 3010, Australia 5Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. Keywords: community composition, competition, disturbance regime, dry sclerophyll vegetation, fire management, fire frequency, Sydney Coastal Heath, Sydney Coastal Forest, species richness Nomenclature: Harden (1991) for species, Taws (1997) for plant communities Running Head: Fire regimes in dry sclerophyll vegetation Applied Vegetation Science Page 2 of 29 1 ABSTRACT 2 Question: Do the effects of fire regimes on plant species richness and composition differ among 3 floristically similar vegetation types? 4 Location: Booderee National Park, south-eastern Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • 08-C-,7,08T 110 '.7.1E0c1hh =TV."' -In= Ix X7C112E.E7
    -08-c-,7,08T 110 '.7.1E0c1HH =TV."' -In= Ix X7C112E.E7 - 191 - APPENDIX XI. Licut. James Tuckcys Re port on N.S.W. Timber, 1802-1804. Banks (BrabDurne) PaPers, VD1.4, M1./178-3, pp.288-295. "Observations on the various kinds of Timber of New South Wales. New South Wales produces a ,_77rcnt variety of Timber trees, to some of which the Colonists have given names descriptive of their qualities, and others ti-ley call by the names of the European trees which they most resemble either iny_eaf,inruit or -4athe texture of the wood. Among the former are C l i (a-) red, i, . black butted gums, () Str ingy, and ( 3 ) Iron barks, ( 1 ) \ turpcntine, al-Ld (5) li ght wood, and the latter are the. C 6 ) She Oak, ( 7 ) Mahogany , (8 ) Cedar, 't 9 ) boy , (1 0 honeysuckle, (71 ) tea pearper tree, tree and.--(74)--(74)±i tree. these trees shed their bark annuall y at the fall the ve r'Y. and are always in fo l iage, ths new leaves forcing off the old 1 The blue and red gums, ar ,, nearly of the same texture, they are very tough and strong, and in ship building appear to be particularly ada pted to frnmln47. The best size is from two -Peet to two and a half for when larger the timber is generally unsound in the heart. The blue zum while standing is subject to be pierced by vr.2ry minute worms, which make innumerable holes scarce visible to the naked eye. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • North Head Site Story
    Overview of North Head North Head, a tied island formed approximately 90 million years ago, is the northern headland at the entrance to Sydney Harbour. Derived from Hawkesbury Sandstone and Newport formations, the headland is comprised of predominantly sandstone and shale, which support a mosaic of different vegetation types. This land is managed by National Parks and Wildlife Service, Sydney Harbour Federation Trust, Q Station, The Australian Institute of Police Management and the North Head Sewerage Treatment Plant, Northern Beaches Council and others. North Head is a national heritage site. Banksia aemula, a characteristic species of Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub (ESBS), with Leptospermum laevigatum dominated senescent Flora at North Head ESBS in the background. North Head is dominated by dense sclerophyllous vegetation, which comprises eight distinct bentwing bat (Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis).Two vegetation communities, including Coastal notable, and somewhat iconic, species that occur Sandstone Plateau Heath, Coastal Rock-plate at North Head are the long-nosed bandicoot Heath, Coastal Sandstone Ridgetop Woodland and (Perameles nasuta) and the little penguin the endangered Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub (Eudyptula minor), with both listed as threatened (ESBS). Characteristic species of plants within populations. these communities include the smooth-barked Several major threats to both flora and fauna occur apple (Angophora costata), red bloodwood (Corymbia at North Head. These include predation by gummifera), coastal tea tree (Leptospermum laevigatum), domestic and feral animals, vehicle strike heath-leaved banksia (Banksia ericifolia) and the (particularly bandicoots), fragmentation and loss of coastal banksia (Banksia integrifolia). A total of more habitat, weed infestation, inappropriate fire than 460 plant species have been recorded within regimes and stormwater runoff (increasing these communities so far, including the sunshine nutrients and the spread of weeds).
    [Show full text]
  • IS20015 AC.Pdf
    Invertebrate Systematics, 2021, 35, 90–131 © CSIRO 2021 doi:10.1071/IS20015_AC Supplementary material Determining the position of Diomocoris, Micromimetus and Taylorilygus in the Lygus-complex based on molecular data and first records of Diomocoris and Micromimetus from Australia, including four new species (Insecta : Hemiptera : Miridae : Mirinae) Anna A. NamyatovaA,B,E, Michael D. SchwartzC and Gerasimos CassisD AAll-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, Podbelskogo Highway, 3, Pushkin, RU-196608 Saint Petersburg, Russia. BZoologial Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Embankment, 1, RU-199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia. CAgriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Canadian National Collection of Insects, 960 Carling Avenue, K.W. Neatby Building, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada. DEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2052, Australia. ECorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Page 1 of 46 Fig. S1. RAxML tree for the dataset with 124 taxa. Page 2 of 46 Fig. S2. RAxML tree for the dataset with 108 taxa. Page 3 of 46 Fig. S3. RAxML tree for the dataset with 105 taxa. Page 4 of 46 Full data on the specimens examined Diomocoris nebulosus (Poppius, 1914) AUSTRALIA: Australian Capital Territory: Tidbinbilla Nature Reserve, 25 km SW of Canberra, 35.46414°S 148.9083°E, 770 m, 11 Feb 1984, W. Middlekauff, Bursaria sp. (Pittosporaceae), 1♀ (AMNH_PBI 00242761) (CAS). New South Wales: 0.5 km SE of Lansdowne, 33.89949°S 150.97578°E, 12 Nov 1990, G. Williams, Acmena smithii (Poir.) Merr. & L.M. Perry (Myrtaceae), 1♂ (UNSW_ENT 00044752), 1♀ (UNSW_ENT 00044753) (AM). 1 km W of Sth Durras Northead Road, 35.66584°S 150.25846°E, 05 Oct 1985, G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Native Vegetation of the Cumberland Plain, Western Sydney: Systematic Classification and Field Identification of Communities
    Tozer, Native vegetation of the Cumberland Plain 1 The native vegetation of the Cumberland Plain, western Sydney: systematic classification and field identification of communities Mark Tozer NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, PO Box 1967 Hurstville 2220, AUSTRALIA phone: (02) 9585 6496, fax.: (02) 9585 6606, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Twenty-two vascular plant communities occurring on, and adjacent to the Cumberland Plain and Hornsby Plateau, are defined using a multi-variate analysis of quantitative field survey data. Communities are described using structural features, habitat characteristics and diagnostic species. Diagnostic species are identified using a statistical fidelity measure. The pre–European spatial distribution of communities is estimated using a decision tree approach to derive relationships between community distribution and geological, climatic and topographical variables. Contemporary vegetation cover is estimated from 1:16 000 scale aerial photography (1997/98) and sorted into six categories based on cover of Eucalyptus species. These categories are only approximately related to vegetation condition: high Eucalyptus cover classes are most likely to contain high levels of floristic diversity, but areas with scattered cover or no cover at all may have either high or low diversity. Map accuracy is assessed using independent field samples and is primarily limited by the accuracy of 1:100 000 geological maps. Patterns in overstorey composition were mapped at 1:16 000 scale but were less useful in delineating community boundaries than was hoped because few species are confined to a single community. The extent to which observer bias may influence estimates of the present extent of remnant vegetation is investigated by comparing the interpretations of two observers for a subset of the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Woollahra Biodiversity Conservation Strategy 2015-2025”
    Woollahra Municipal Council Woollahra Biodiversity Conservation Strategy Biodiversity Conservation Strategy 2015 - 2025 APPENDICES Appendices A 7 - 1 This report should be cited as ‘Woollahra Municipal Council, 2015. Woollahra Biodiversity Conservation Strategy 2015-2025” Woollahra Biodiversity Conservation Strategy Appendices A-2 APPENDIX A – PLANNING AND POLICY FRAMEWORK This appendix describes the planning and policy framework available to assist biodiversity management in Woollahra. International conventions Australia is a signatory to a number of international conventions related to the conservation of biodiversity, as follows: Rio Declaration on Environment and Development 1992 o International Convention on Biological Diversity 1992 o United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change o Agenda 21 Ramsar Convention on Wetlands Japan-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement (JAMBA) China-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement (CAMBA) Bonn Convention Federal Legislation and Strategies Australia has taken some significant steps to meet its international obligations under the international treaties and conventions listed above through the development of the following national strategies: Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment 1992 Australia’s National Biodiversity Conservation Strategy 2010-2030 National Local Government Biodiversity Strategy 1998 Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) The EPBC Act provides a national scheme for environmental protection and biodiversity conservation. It incorporates referral mechanisms to the Commonwealth and environmental impact assessment processes for projects that may impact matters of national significance. Woollahra contains a number of threatened species that are listed under the EPBC Act. Management of biodiversity on Commonwealth land at HMAS Watson is also governed under the EPBC Act where approval is required for actions that are likely to have a significant impact on the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • MU50 Coastal Sand Scrub
    PLANT COMMUNITY FIELD GUIDE Coastal Sand Scrub Map Unit 50 HCCREMS Extant Vegetation Mapping Vegetation communities this guide have been classified and mapped according to Hunter Central Coast Regional Environment Management Strategy (HCCREMS) Vegetation Survey, using Mapping Units (MU). For more compre- hensive and up-to-date information on this survey please contact HCCREMS. http://www.hccrems.com.au When you are starting out regenerating a bushland site, it may be that you don't know a lot of native species, but if you can provide a council vegetation officer, community support officer or local native plant nursery with some of the information from the Field Data sheet, it is likely that they would be able to identify the broader vegetation community. The Site Orientation Booklet in this series has a useful contact list including: Coastcare Officers Landcare and Community Support Officers National Parks Officers Land Managers 2 Field Data Sheet Habitat Type: please circle River bank Wetland Floodplain Drainage line Disturbed / Open Forest Closed Forest Rainforest Grazed (Livestock) Shrub(2-4m) Heath (< 2m) Grassland Other: Position on Slope :please circle Altitude in metres Watercourse Flat Lower Slope Upper Slope Crest Dune Geology Aspect: please circle N NE E SE S SW W NW Soil Description Colour Type pH Sand Clay Loam Vegetation Description Vegetation community, association, type Weed Invasion: please circle High Medium Low Dominant upper storey species Species diversity: please circle High Medium Low Dominant middle storey species Species diversity: please circle High Medium Low Dominant lower storey/groundcover species Species diversity: please circle High Medium Low 3 Common Coastal Vegetation On many sites, there may be some overlapping of these species and other species.
    [Show full text]