DOCSLIB.ORG

Facilitating Greater Reuse and Recycling of Structural Steel in the Construction and Demolition Process

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Facilitating Greater Reuse and Recycling of Structural Steel in the Construction and Demolition Process FACILITATING GREATER REUSE & RECYCLING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL IN THE CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION PROCESS DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL SCIENCE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCE FACILITATING GREATER REUSE AND RECYCLING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION PROCESS FINAL REPORT 20 March 2006 Project Team Dr Mark Gorgolewski Prof. Vera Straka Jordan Edmonds Carmela Sergio Action Plan 2000 Canadian Institute of Steel Construction FINAL REPORT 1 FACILITATING GREATER REUSE & RECYCLING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL IN THE CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION PROCESS Project advisory group The project steering committee provided much useful guidance and assistance throughout the project The members of the steering committee were as follows: David MacKinnon – Canadian Institute for Steel Construction Sylvie Boulanger – Canadian Institute for Steel Construction Susan Wuycik – Spec-Sec Fabricators Matt Humphries – Halsall Engineering Tony De Fina – Russel Metals Ken De Souza – Dofasco Steel Ryan Priestly – Priestly Demolition Vera Straka, – Ryerson University, Architectural Science Jordan Edmonds – Ryerson University, Architectural Science Mark Gorgolewski – Ryerson University, Architectural Science The project was carried out by the Department of Architectural Science at Ryerson University with assistance from the Canadian Institute for Steel Construction. The work was funded by the Enhanced Recycling Component of the Government of Canada Action Plan 2000 on Climate Change, Minerals and Metals Program (managed by the Minerals and Metals Sector, Natural Resources Canada), and by the Canadian Institute for Steel Construction (CISC). FINAL REPORT 2 FACILITATING GREATER REUSE & RECYCLING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL IN THE CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION PROCESS Executive Summary The aim of this project is to develop a greater understanding of the materials flows in the steel construction industry and using this knowledge to provide tools that will facilitate greater reuse and recycling of steel components. The project involved three inter-related activities: Industry survey Initial work focused on investigating the materials flows and mechanisms within the steel construction sector to understand the opportunities for steel component reuse. A variety of organisations were contacted and surveyed, including steel service centres, demolition contractors, salvage yards, designers, and steel fabricators. The aim was to better understand the processes, and if possible the numbers, linked to construction, recycling and reuse of steel. The results of this stage are reported in chapter 2 of this report. The diagram below indicates the main steel flows that were identified. In summary, the conclusions of this work suggest that reuse of steel components does occur but much of in an informal way, often for secondary uses. The shoring industry is a major user of larger reused sections, as they can adapt their requirements to suit availability. For other building uses, matching demand for particular sections with what is available at any time is a problem. Also, procedural issues can prevent much reuse. Pre-engineered, mainly industrial and storage, buildings regularly are deconstructed for reuse. Other major factors that affect steel reuse are the value of scrap steel, health and safety legislation, and construction economic activity. The recent high value of scrap steel on world markets has discouraged FINAL REPORT 3 FACILITATING GREATER REUSE & RECYCLING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL IN THE CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION PROCESS steel component reuse. The value of reused steel components is linked to the cost of new steel. Demolition contractors and salvage yards can get a high price for scrap steel that goes to steel mills for recycling and so they are not willing to make the additional effort and incur extra costs to extract the components in such a way that they can be reused. Health and safety legislation is sometimes perceived to add cost due to the more careful processes of deconstruction that are necessary for steel components to be removed undamaged for reuse. Others dispute this, although it is accepted that additional time is often required. When demolition contractors are busy they will tend to choose the quickest option which does not usually involve the care required for component reuse. Also, demolition is often on the critical path of a new build project and the client wants this done as quickly as possible. Deconstruction adds time to the process. Accurate figures for the amount of recycling and reuse of steel from demolition were difficult to obtain. However, from discussions with the industry it was estimated that approximately 90% of steel arising from demolition goes back to the steel mills for recycling, about 10% goes to some form of component reuse, and only a minimal amount, perhaps less than 1% goes to landfill as it is difficult to extract from the waste stream. However, in addition a considerable number of steel structures are not completely demolished. Rather they undergo major adaptive reuse where the steel structure is reused in the same location but for a new use. This is a very beneficial form of steel reuse. It has been estimated that reductions in greenhouse gas emissions of between 3,000 and 4,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide annually results from current construction steel reuse. Further annual reductions of 300 to 350 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions each year (200 tonnes from adaptive building reuse and 100 to 150 tonnes from component reuse) may be possible as a consequence of increased awareness resulting from greater environmental concern in the industry and the information supplied by this project. Assuming such a rate of growth, over 5 years, total savings resulting from steel reuse may be between 19,500 and 24,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide and over 10 years may be between 46,500 and 59,250 tonnes of carbon dioxide. Web site The second part of the project involved establishing a web site to inform the industry about opportunities for reusing steel in environmentally responsible ways and to facilitate the exchange of steel construction components. A reuse-steel.org web site has been established with information for designers, case studies, resources, news items, and the opportunity for posting ‘available’ items of used construction steel components that are offered for sale and ‘wanted’ postings from those looking for steel components. Case studies and information papers For the third component of the project, eight case studies about relevant building projects that feature some steel reuse were prepared, each one focusing on a particular building and aspects of steel reuse, how it affected the design and construction process, and what lessons can be learned. The case studies are aimed at architects and structural engineers. In addition, 4 information papers were prepared. Rather than looking at a specific building, these focus on a particular issue, and provide designers with guidance on how to address issues that will aid in component reuse. Each case study and information paper will be published individually and made available to view and download through the reuse-steel.org web site. Finally, a dissemination plan has been proposed to ensure that the work carried out is presented to a wide audience of relevant groups, and recommendations have been made about future work that may increase the level of component reuse. FINAL REPORT 4 FACILITATING GREATER REUSE & RECYCLING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL IN THE CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION PROCESS Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 BACKGROUND 7 1.2 RECYCLING AND REUSE AND CLIMATE CHANGE 9 1.2.1 THE WASTE MANAGEMENT HIERARCHY 9 1.2.2 ADVANTAGES OF REUSE AND RECYCLING 10 1.2.3 FORMS OF REUSE AND RECYCLING 10 1.2.4 STEEL REUSE 11 1.2.5 LEEDTM 12 1.3 THE SCOPE OF THIS PROJECT 13 2 SURVEY AND REVIEW OF STEEL SALVAGE INDUSTRY 14 2.1 ORGANISATIONS CONTACTED 14 2.1.1 STEEL SERVICE CENTRES (SSCS) 14 2.1.2 DEMOLITION CONTRACTORS 19 2.1.3 SCRAP STEEL DEALERS/SALVAGE YARDS 22 2.1.4 STEEL FABRICATORS & ERECTORS 25 2.1.5 DESIGNERS 29 2.1.6 SHORING INDUSTRY 31 2.2 STRUCTURE OF THE INDUSTRY 33 2.3 SUMMARY OF SURVEYS 33 3 REUSE-STEEL.ORG WEB SITE 36 3.1 MATERIALS EXCHANGE WEB SITES 36 3.1.1 REVIEW OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS EXCHANGE WEB SITES 37 3.1.2 PROPOSAL FOR EXCHANGE FACILITATION 37 3.2 PROPOSED STRUCTURE AND CONTENT OF REUSE-STEEL.ORG WEB SITE 38 3.2.1 STRUCTURE OF THE WEB SITE 39 3.2.2 WEB SITE EFFECTIVENESS 41 4 CASE STUDIES 42 4.1 LIST OF IDENTIFIED PROJECTS 42 4.2 SUMMARIES OF CASE STUDIES 45 4.2.1 UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO SCARBOROUGH CAMPUS STUDENT CENTRE 45 4.2.2 MOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT CO-OP OTTAWA, ONTARIO 46 4.2.3 PARKWOOD RESIDENCES 47 4.2.4 REUSE OF STRUCTURAL STEEL AT BEDZED 48 4.2.5 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ANGUS TECHNÔPOLE 49 4.2.6 THE DECONSTRUCTION AND REBUILDING OF 740 RUE BEL-AIR, MONTRÉAL 50 4.2.7 BMW SALES AND SERVICE CENTRE, DOWNTOWN TORONTO 51 4.2.8 ROY STIBBS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, COQUITLAM, BRITISH COLUMBIA 52 FINAL REPORT 5 FACILITATING GREATER REUSE & RECYCLING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL IN THE CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION PROCESS 5 INFORMATION PAPERS 53 5.1 SUMMARIES OF INFORMATION PAPERS 53 5.1.1 DESIGN FOR ADAPTABILITY IN STEEL 53 5.1.2 STEEL COMPONENT DESIGN FOR DECONSTRUCTION 54 5.1.3 EARNING LEEDTM CREDITS THROUGH REUSE OF STEEL 55 5.1.4 REVIEW OF THE HISTORY OF STRUCTURAL STEEL STANDARDS 56 6 DISSEMINATION STRATEGY 57 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 59 7.1 CONCLUSIONS FROM SURVEYS 59 7.2 OUTCOMES OF THE PROJECT 61 7.2.1 CONCERNS AND LIABILITY ISSUES 63 7.3 RECOMMENDATIONS 64 APPENDIX A
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reduce Reuse Recycle Remanufacture
    STEEL - THE PERMANENT MATERIAL IN THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY AR ECONOMY BEN CUL EFI CIR TS E R R C E a U U w n D S m io E E a t t c R e u r i d a e l r s s c n o o n i s s s e i r v m a e t i 2 o O n C E n o E R i f t f U a ic R v o ie T n E n c C In y C Y FA C U LE N MA RE ts Jo duc bs pro Durable 1 CONTENTS Steel in the circular economy 3 Steel is essential to our modern world 5 Reduce 7 Decreasing the amount of material, energy and other resources used to create steel and reducing the weight of steel used in products. Use and reuse 11 Reuse is using an object or material again, either for its original purpose or for a similar purpose, without significantly altering the physical form of the object or material. Remanufacture 15 The process of restoring durable used steel products to as-new condition. Recycle 19 Melting steel products at the end of their useful life to create new steels. Recycling alters the physical form of the steel object so that a new application can be created from the recycled material. End notes 22 2 STEEL IN THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY A sustainable circular economy is one in which steel is fundamental to the circular economy. society reduces the burden on nature by ensuring The industry is continuing to expand its offer resources remain in use for as long as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher-Quality Electric-Arc Furnace Steel
    ACADEMIC PULSE Higher-Quality Electric-Arc Furnace Steel teelmakers have traditionally viewed Research Continues to Improve the electric arc furnaces (EAFs) as unsuitable Quality of Steel for producing steel with the highest- Even with continued improvements to the Squality surface finish because the process design of steelmaking processes, the steelmaking uses recycled steel instead of fresh iron. With over research community has focused their attention 100 years of processing improvements, however, on the fundamental materials used in steelmaking EAFs have become an efficient and reliable in order to improve the quality of steel. In my lab steelmaking alternative to integrated steelmaking. In at Carnegie Mellon University, we have several fact, steel produced in a modern-day EAF is often research projects that deal with controlling the DR. P. BILLCHRIS MAYER PISTORIUS indistinguishable from what is produced with the impurity concentration and chemical quality of POSCOManaging Professor Editorof Materials integrated blast-furnace/oxygen-steelmaking route. steel produced in EAFs. Science412-306-4350 and Engineering [email protected] Mellon University Improvements in design, coupled with research For example, we recently used mathematical developments in metallurgy, mean high-quality steel modeling to explore ways to control produced quickly and energy-efficiently. phosphorus. Careful regulation of temperature, slag and stirring are needed to produce low- Not Your (Great-) Grandparent’s EAF phosphorus steel. We analyzed data from Especially since the mid-1990s, there have been operating furnaces and found that, in many significant improvements in the design of EAFs, cases, the phosphorus removal reaction could which allow for better-functioning burners and a proceed further.
    [Show full text]
  • STEEL in the CIRCULAR ECONOMY a Life Cycle Perspective CONTENTS
    STEEL IN THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY A life cycle perspective CONTENTS Foreword 3 The circular economy 4 Life cycle thinking 6 The life cycle assessment (LCA) approach 8 worldsteel’s LCA methodology and life cycle inventory (LCI) database 10 Sustainability and life cycle assessment 12 LCA in the steel industry 14 LCA by life cycle phase 15 Raw materials and steel production 15 Markets for by-products 16 Manufacturing and use 16 Reuse and remanufacturing 18 Recycling 19 LCA initiatives 20 Regional and global initiatives 21 Market sector initiatives 22 Construction 22 Automotive 24 Packaging 25 End notes 28 Glossary 29 Cover image: Steel staircase, office building, Prague, Czech Republic Design: double-id.com FOREWORD We live in a rapidly changing world with finite resources. Too many legislative bodies around the world At the same time, improvements in standards of living still enact regulations which only affect the “use and eradication of poverty, combined with global phase” of a product’s life, for example water and population growth, exert pressure on our ecosystems. energy consumption for washing machines, energy consumption for a fridge or CO2 emissions whilst As steel is everywhere in our lives and is at the heart driving a vehicle. This focus on the “use phase” can of our sustainable future, our industry is an integral part lead to more expensive alternative lower density of the global circular economy. The circular economy materials being employed but which typically have a promotes zero waste, reduces the amount of materials higher environmental burden when the whole life cycle used, and encourages the reuse and recycling of is considered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stainless Steel Family
    The Stainless Steel Family A short description of the various grades of stainless steel and how they fit into distinct metallurgical families. It has been written primarily from a European perspective and may not fully reflect the practice in other regions. Stainless steel is the term used to describe an extremely versatile family of engineering materials, which are selected primarily for their corrosion and heat resistant properties. All stainless steels contain principally iron and a minimum of 10.5% chromium. At this level, chromium reacts with oxygen and moisture in the environment to form a protective, adherent and coherent, oxide film that envelops the entire surface of the material. This oxide film (known as the passive or boundary layer) is very thin (2-3 namometres). [1nanometre = 10-9 m]. The passive layer on stainless steels exhibits a truly remarkable property: when damaged (e.g. abraded), it self-repairs as chromium in the steel reacts rapidly with oxygen and moisture in the environment to reform the oxide layer. Increasing the chromium content beyond the minimum of 10.5% confers still greater corrosion resistance. Corrosion resistance may be further improved, and a wide range of properties provided, by the addition of 8% or more nickel. The addition of molybdenum further increases corrosion resistance (in particular, resistance to pitting corrosion), while nitrogen increases mechanical strength and enhances resistance to pitting. Categories of Stainless Steels The stainless steel family tree has several branches, which may be differentiated in a variety of ways e.g. in terms of their areas of application, by the alloying elements used in their production, or, perhaps the most accurate way, by the metallurgical phases present in their microscopic structures: .
    [Show full text]
  • Used Motor Oil and Filter Recycling Guide
    USED MOTOR OIL & FILTER RECYCLING LEARN MORE Used Motor Oil and Oil Filter Recycling Guide Used Motor Oil is a Hazardous Waste Used motor oil is a hazardous waste that should never be put in the garbage or dumped in the storm drains or on the ground. Just one quart of motor oil can contaminate 250,000 gallons of water, creating health risks and environmental impacts across our community. Recycling is Free and Easy Used motor oil can be refined and Recycling right is more than an individual choice - it is part of how we are all reconditioned to become usable again. Paper, making a difference for a cleaner Oakland and more livable neighborhoods. steel, and plastic from used oil filters can also With your participation, Oakland’s Zero Waste program strives to divert all be recycled. recyclable and compostable material away from our landfills. There are three options for recycling used Your used motor oil recycling team is a partnership between the City of motor oil and filters: Oakland, California Waste Solutions, and CalRecycle. Our commitment to you is to provide the services and information you need to recycle right. 1. Curbside residential recycling pickup 2. Certified Collection Center drop-off locations When you pledge to recycle right, we’re here to help. 3. Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) collection facility Oaklanders Recycle No matter where you live in the City, there is a free and easy recycling option Contacts and Important Phone Numbers close to you. Visit recycleusedoil.org to find a location near you. California Waste Solutions ...............................................................(510) 625–5263 Used Motor Oil & Filters Improper Disposal is Illegal Disposal [email protected] www.calwaste.com 我們講中文 Hablamos español When you dispose hazardous materials properly, it benefits Household Hazardous Waste Drop Off ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Steelmaking by Electric Arc Furnaces Cleaner, More Efficient
    EVRAZ Canadian Steel: Low Carbon Footprint November 2016 Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs) with metal scrap: cleaner, more efficient • EVRAZ Regina utilizes two Electricity Steelmaking EAFs to make up to 1.1 Generation million tons of steel per Energy used CO2 emissions CO2 emissions year kg / ton of steel kWh / ton of steel grams / kWh -79% • Over 91% of steelmaking -64% -81% 2,081 in China is from Blast 4,624 764 Oxygen Furnaces (BOFs), which use iron ore, coking coal, and other inputs • For every one ton of steel scrap made into new steel, over 1,400kg of iron ore, 1,647 740kg of coal, and 120kg 441 147 of limestone are saved Overseas input shipping to China Blast EAF Blast EAF China Canada Furance Furnace Sources: BOF percentage: Worldsteel. Shipping emissions: National Technical University of Athens. Steelmaking: Midrex – Blast Furnace assuming 11% Scrap, EAF Use of 100% scrap. Scrap statistics: Worldsteel. Electricity Generation: IEA 2011 2 EVRAZ cleaner EAFs, Canada’s power generation outpace others Emissions from Steelmaking emissions and energy use energy generation Energy used CO2 emissions CO2 emissions kg / ton of steel kWh / ton of steel grams / kWh -79% -64% 2,081 4,624 -81% 764 1,526 3,419 2,327 476 470 929 1,647 441 147 China Germany Turkey EVRAZ Blast GermanyTurkey EAF China Turkey Germany Canada - BOF Canada Furnace - EAF - China Overseas shipping of inputs Sources: BOF percentage: Worldsteel. Shipping emissions: National Technical University of Athens, from China to BC, Europe to Houston. Steelmaking: Midrex – Blast Furnace assuming 11% Scrap, EAF Use of 100% scrap.
    [Show full text]
  • AISI | Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking
    http://www.steel.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Articles3&TEMPLATE=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=12308 Home Steelworks Home Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking By Jeremy A. T. Jones, Nupro Corporation SIGN UP to receive AISI's FREE e-news! Read the latest. Email: Name: Join Courtesy of Mannesmann Demag Corp. FURNACE OPERATIONS The electric arc furnace operates as a batch melting process producing batches of molten steel known "heats". The electric arc furnace operating cycle is called the tap-to-tap cycle and is made up of the following operations: Furnace charging Melting Refining De-slagging Tapping Furnace turn-around Modern operations aim for a tap-to-tap time of less than 60 minutes. Some twin shell furnace operations are achieving tap-to-tap times of 35 to 40 minutes. 10/3/2008 9:36 AM http://www.steel.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Articles3&TEMPLATE=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=12308 Furnace Charging The first step in the production of any heat is to select the grade of steel to be made. Usually a schedule is developed prior to each production shift. Thus the melter will know in advance the schedule for his shift. The scrap yard operator will prepare buckets of scrap according to the needs of the melter. Preparation of the charge bucket is an important operation, not only to ensure proper melt-in chemistry but also to ensure good melting conditions. The scrap must be layered in the bucket according to size and density to promote the rapid formation of a liquid pool of steel in the hearth while providing protection for the sidewalls and roof from electric arc radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Energy Benefit of Stainless Steel Recycling
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Energy Policy ] (]]]]) ]]]–]]] www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol The energy benefit of stainless steel recycling Jeremiah Johnsona,b,Ã, B.K. Reckb, T. Wangb, T.E. Graedelb aProgram in Environmental Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA bCenter for Industrial Ecology, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, 205 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 02140, USA Received 5 December 2006; accepted 21 August 2007 Abstract The energy used to produce austenitic stainless steel was quantified throughout its entire life cycle for three scenarios: (1) current global operations, (2) 100% recycling, and (3) use of only virgin materials. Data are representative of global average operations in the early 2000s. The primary energy requirements to produce 1 metric ton of austenitic stainless steel (with assumed metals concentrations of 18% Cr, 8% Ni, and 74% Fe) is (1) 53 GJ, (2) 26 GJ, and (3) 79 GJ for each scenario, with CO2 releases totaling (1) 3.6 metric tons CO2, (2) 1.6 metric tons CO2, and (3) 5.3 metric tons CO2. Thus, the production of 17 million metric tons of austenitic stainless steel in 2004 used 17 approximately 9.0 Â 10 J of primary energy and released 61 million metric tons of CO2. Current recycling operations reduce energy use 17 by 33% (4.4 Â 10 J) and CO2 emissions by 32% (29 million tons). If austenitic stainless steel were to be produced solely from scrap, which is currently not possible on a global level due to limited availability, energy use would be 67% less than virgin-based production and CO2 emissions would be cut by 70%.
    [Show full text]
  • Euric Metal Recycling Factsheet
    Metal Recycling Factsheet EuRIC AISBL – Recycling: Bridging Circular Economy & Climate Policy 2 EuRIC Metal Recycling Factsheet METAL RECYCLING INDUSTRY Metals are broadly present in a variety of goods with both short and long term use (i.e., steel bars in our houses, bridges, and turbines, copper cables for communication, railway tracks, kitchen equipment, cars, etc.). EU economic growth is deeply linked to the use of metals with metal supply widely depending on metal scrap. Scrap metals from recycling compete globally on commodity markets, hence the need to ensure both a well- functioning internal market for metal recyclers and unhampered access to international markets. Createdfrom the by Noun Bagundas Project CO2 EuRIC AISBL – Recycling: Bridging Circular Economy & Climate Policy 3 EuRIC Metal Recycling Factsheet Metals & Circular Economy Results of the growing metal demand on a linear economy are: • Declining ore grades. • Resource scarcity and price hikes. DISTRIB UTI • Environmental impacts (air and water pollution, land degradation, N ON IO biodiversity loss). CT U D O R P Despite historical metal reuse, there is an increasing need to move C O N towards a more efficient circular economy model. S U M P Thanks to their unique properties, metals can be indefinitely T CIRCULAR ECONOMY I O recycled. At their end-of-life (EoL) stage, products made of metals N can be re-processed via mechanical treatment and re-introduced to R O T the production process to make new metals. As a result, value chains C E S R are already largely circular, despite room for improvement. E G - U N I S L E C / R Y E C P E A R Metal recycling closes the loop within the production process, I R / R E C Y C E L therefore reducing the amount of waste that goes into landfill and the amount of primary raw materials required.
    [Show full text]
  • Gardenworks Guide to Compost and Mulching
    The Green Institute, 2801 21 st Ave S, Suite 110, Minneapolis, MN 55407 612-278-7123 [email protected] www.gardenworksMN.org ~ Promoting and Preserving Community Gardening acro ss the Twin Cities ~ Composting and Mulching Created by Corrie Zoll, GreenSpace Partners, The Green Institute, for a Compost Workshop, February 2003. Updated by GardenWorks, April 2007. Making Compost Why should I make compost? Whether or not you’re a gardener, composting is a common sense way to handle a significant amount of the waste you produce. Think of it like recycling cans. You buy a can of Spam, use the Spam, and you’re left with the can. The can is made of steel. That steel can be used again. That steel is much easier to reuse if you recycle it than if you put it in a landfill. Your coffee grounds, vegetable peels, moldy bread, grass clippings, and fall leaves are also made from reusable materials. Like steel, these materials are much easier to reuse if you recycle them than if you put them in a landfill. But unlike recycling steel, you can recycle coffee grounds at home, and you can use the final product at home, too. I think composting today is where steel recycling was 25 years ago. People know about it, people know it’s a good thing to do, but there isn’t much incentive to do it. As the amount of waste we produce increases, so does the cost per volume of disposing of that waste material. Cities can’t avoid looking for new ways to keep waste out of landfills.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework for Designing Sustainable Structures Through Steel Beam Reuse
    sustainability Article Framework for Designing Sustainable Structures through Steel Beam Reuse Seongjun Kim 1 and Sung-Ah Kim 2,* 1 Department of Convergence Engineering for Future City, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 October 2020; Accepted: 12 November 2020; Published: 15 November 2020 Abstract: The architecture, engineering, and construction sector requires carbon-intensive materials, such as steel, in the construction process and generates a large amount of waste in the life cycle. This causes global warming and waste problems. The demand for the reuse of construction materials is increasing, although it is not the convention, to reduce the environmental impact. Although the sustainable effect of the reuse of materials has been proven in several studies, materials are not always reused in practice, owing to the lack of an information system for reusable materials and the economic uncertainty. In this study, we propose a framework for designing structures using reusable steel beams. The design framework consists of a material bank and a design support tool. The material bank provides information on reusable materials based on the building information modeling. The design support tool generates efficient material procurement plans and provides information about the environmental and economic impact of the project. In a case study used to verify the framework, CO2 emissions were reduced by up to 77% through material reuse, which was consistent with the results of previous studies. However, owing to the cost of processing reusable materials, the overall cost was found to increase by up to about 40%.
    [Show full text]
  • Used Oil Oil Filters
    Where can I recycle my used Oil or Oil Filters? Tips from Kaya Locations across the state accept used motor oil and oil filters for recycling. Automotive Used oil is recycled by being re-refined related businesses statewide may serve as to remove contaminants and water. a drop off locations for your used oil or oil Oil displaying the API “Donut” or filters or take them to your local Regional ILSAC “Starburst” meets the same Change Our Ways. Collection Center (RCC). certification as virgin motor oil and can be used in engines or as lubricating oil. For the location of your nearest RCC, visit Change Our World. www.SafeSmartSolutions.org. For the location of some businesses that accept used oil or oil filters visit the Automotive Products Disposal Directory at www.iowadnr.gov/FABA For more information contact your local Solid Waste Agency USED OIL or your Regional Collection Center. API “Donut” ILSAC “Starburst” www.SafeSmartSolutions.org AND OIL FILTERS What happens to used motor oil I bring in to recycle? Used oil can be reprocessed into fuel that can be used in furnaces for heat, or in power plants to generate electricity for homes, schools and businesses. It can also be used in industrial and utility boilers or blended for marine fuels. Used motor oil can also be re-refined into lubricating oils that meet the same API specifications as virgin motor oil. Used Oil Used Oil Filters Oil doesn’t wear out, it just gets dirty. As it Even after a filter has been drained for lubricates your engine it picks up a variety several hours according to federal guidelines, of contaminants, causing the need for an oil several ounces of oil may remain trapped change.
    [Show full text]