Women, Collective Creation, and Devised Performance the Rise of Women Theatre Artists in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Women, Collective Creation, and Devised Performance the Rise of Women Theatre Artists in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries Women, Collective Creation, and Devised Performance The Rise of Women Theatre Artists in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries Edited by Kathryn Mederos Syssoyeva and Scott Proudfit Women, Collective Creation, and Devised Performance Kathryn Mederos Syssoyeva • Scott Proudfi t Editors Women, Collective Creation, and Devised Performance The Rise of Women Theatre Artists in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries Editors Kathryn Mederos Syssoyeva Scott Proudfi t Department of Theatre Department of English Dixie State University Elon University Saint George , Utah , USA Elon , North Carolina , USA ISBN 978-1-137-60327-2 ISBN 978-1-137-55013-2 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-55013-2 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016949421 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the pub- lisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. Cover image: Judith Smith and Janet Collard in AXIS Dance Company’s Foregone, choreographed by Kate Weare. Photo © Andrea Basile. Printed on acid-free paper This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by Springer Nature The registered company is Nature America Inc. New York For Carl Weber, once again: your infl uence only strengthens with time. (K.M.S.) For Dr. William L. Proudfi t, for your love and wisdom (S.P.) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Parts of Jessica Silsby Brater’s chapter “Ruth Maleczech, JoAnne Akalaitis, and the Mabou Mines Family Aesthetic” are based on material in Brater’s book Ruth Maleczech at Mabou Mines: Woman’s Work (London: Methuen Drama, 2016). Parts of Julia Listengarten’s chapter “Pussy Riot and Performance as Social Practice: Collectivity, Collaboration, and Communal Bond” origi- nally appeared under the title “Profi le: Performing Punk Prayer: Pussy Riot and National Controversy” in Ecumenica, a Journal of Theatre and Performance , 5, no. 2 (2012). vii CONTENTS Part I First Wave, 1900–1945 1 1 Toward a New History of Women in the Modern Theatre – an Introduction 3 Kathryn Mederos Syssoyeva and Scott Proudfi t 2 Raising the Curtain on Suzanne Bing’s Life in the Theatre 29 Jane Baldwin 3 From Neva Boyd to Viola Spolin: How Social Group Work in 1920s’ Settlement Houses Defi ned Collective Creation in 1960s’ Theatres 51 Scott Proudfi t 4 A Democratic Legacy: Hallie Flanagan and the Vassar Experimental Theatre 67 Elizabeth A. Osborne 5 Alexandra Remizova: An “Actors’ Director” 81 Andrei Malaev-Babel ix x CONTENTS Part II Second Wave, 1945–1985 99 6 Mnouchkine & Co.: Constructing a Collective 101 David Calder 7 Ruth Maleczech, JoAnne Akalaitis, and the Mabou Mines Family Aesthetic 115 Jessica Silsby Brater 8 “Hers and His”: Carolyn Swift, Alan Simpson, and Collective Creation at Dublin’s Pike Theatre 129 Siobhán O’Gorman 9 From the Center to the Heartland: The Collective, Collaborative Conscience of Jo Ann Schmidman, Megan Terry, Sora Kimberlain, and the Omaha Magic Theatre (1968–1998) 145 Anne Fletcher 10 Historiographing a Feminist Utopia: Collective Creation, History, and Feminist Theatre in Canada 161 Michelle MacArthur 11 Monstrous Regiment: The Gendered Politics of Collaboration, Writing, and Authorship in the UK from the 1970s Onwards 177 Sarah Sigal Part III Third Wave, 1985–Present 191 12 Judith Malina and the Living Theatre: Storming the Barricades and Creating Collectively 193 Cindy Rosenthal CONTENTS xi 13 Bryony Lavery: Nerves of Steel and a Forgiving Heart 207 Karen Morash 14 Women, Transmission, and Creative Agency in the Grotowski Diaspora 221 Virginie Magnat 15 The Women of Odin Teatret: Creativity, Challenge, Legacy 237 Adam J. Ledger 16 Doing What Comes Naturally?: Women and Devising in the UK Today 253 Alex Mermikides and Jackie Smart 17 Devising Downtown: Collective Creation and Female Leadership in Contemporary New York 269 Rachel Anderson-Rabern 18 (The Waters) Between Africa and America: Revelations in Process, Theatrical-Jazz, and Sharon Bridgforth’s River See 283 Nia O. Witherspoon 19 Hands like starfi sh/Feet like moons: Disabled Women’s Theatre Collectives 301 Victoria Lewis 20 Pussy Riot and Performance as Social Practice: Collectivity, Collaboration, and Communal Bond 317 Julia Listengarten Suggested Works 331 Index 337 NOTES ON CONTRIBUTORS Rachel Anderson-Rabern is a scholar, director, and performer researching within the fi elds of collective creation and contemporary performance. Through theory and practice, she investigates aesthetics emerging from collaborative processes. Her writings have appeared in Theatre Journal , TDR: The Drama Review , and Collective Creation in Contemporary Performance (ed. Kathryn Syssoyeva and Scott Proudfi t, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013). She has created performance with Miracle Theatre, Stanford Summer Theatre, Mountain View Center for the Performing Arts, and for multiple colleges and universities. She is Assistant Professor of Theatre at Franklin and Marshall College, USA, and co-founder of Wee Keep Company, an interdisciplinary laboratory for thinking and theatre-making. Jane Baldwin is an actress, critic, and academic. Her publications include: Michel Saint-Denis and the Shaping of the Modern Actor ; The Rediscovery of Style and Other Writings , which she edited; and Vies et morts de la création collective , co-edited with Christiane Page and Jean-Marc Larrue. Her essay “Michel Saint-Denis: Training the Complete Actor” appears in Actor Training , edited by Alison Hodge. Her chapter “The Accidental Rebirth of Collective Creation, Jacques Copeau, Michel Saint-Denis, Léon Chancerel and Improvised Theatre” is published in A History of Collective Creation , edited by Kathryn Syssoyeva and Scott Proudfi t. Her latest work, “Jean Gascon’s Theatricalist Approach to Molière and Shakespeare,” appears in The Oxford Handbook of Dance and Theater . Jessica Silsby Brater is a visiting assistant professor and the Theater Program Director at the University of New Haven, USA, where she teaches courses in con- temporary performance, theatre history, directing, and theatre for community impact. She also serves as an Assistant Dean of the UNH College of Arts and Sciences. Her book Ruth Maleczech at Mabou Mines: Woman’s Work is forthcom- xiii xiv NOTES ON CONTRIBUTORS ing in 2016. Her writing has appeared in Theatre Journal , Samuel Beckett Today/ Aujourd’hui , and the Journal of Beckett Studies . Brater is the founding Artistic Director of Polybe + Seats, a Brooklyn-based theatre company. She holds a BA from Barnard College, Columbia University, and a PhD in Theatre Studies from CUNY Graduate Center. David Calder is Lecturer in Drama at the University of Manchester, UK. He completed his PhD in Theatre and Drama at Northwestern University in 2014. His essays on French theatre and performance have appeared in TDR: The Drama Review and in the anthologies Shakespeare Beyond English: A Global Experiment (2013) and A History of Collective Creation (2013). He is preparing a manuscript on street theatre and the production of postindustrial space. Anne Fletcher is Professor of Theatre at Southern Illinois University Carbondale, IL. She is the author of Rediscovering Mordecai Gorelik: Scene Design and the American Theatre (2009) and co-author (with Scott R. Irelan and Julie Felise Dubiner) of The Process of Dramaturgy: A Handbook (2010), Experiencing Theatre with Scott R. Irelan (2015), and a forthcoming volume on American playwrights of the 1930s. Fletcher’s work has appeared in journals including Theatre Symposium , The Eugene O’Neill Review , and Theatre History Studies . She has chapters in books including Thornton Wilder: New Perspectives ; Blackwell Companion to American Drama ; Brecht, Broadway, and United States Theatre ; Bloomsbury Anthology on American Tragedy (forthcoming); and Experiments in Democracy (forthcoming). Adam J. Ledger is Senior Lecturer in Drama and Theatre Arts at the University of Birmingham, UK. He taught previously at University College Cork and the University of Hull, and has directed projects internationally. His research centers on contemporary performance practice: books include Odin Teatret: Theatre in a New Century (2012) and The Director and Directing: Craft, Process and Aesthetic in Contemporary Theatre (forthcoming) as well as numerous articles and chapters on theatre practice and practitioners. He is joint artistic director of The Bone Ensemble: productions include Again , Caravania! and The Igloo Project. Victoria Lewis’s verbatim documentary play, On the Road: A Reenactment of the First Congressional Hearings on the ADA, September 27, 1988 , was
Recommended publications
  • I Acknowledgements This Dissertation Is Not As Well
    Acknowledgements This dissertation is not as well written as I may wish, and my learnings not as explicit as I might wish, but the value this project has for me I will carry with me forever, and it will always be informing my engagement with the world around me. So Id like to start with “thank you.” To Ørjan Hattrem for having faith enough to invite me into his exiting school, to all the teachers and staff at HiNT for their warmth and generosity, to the class of 2014 for me to research with them, and to NTNU. Putting me through this project forced me to undertake a journey I was perhaps not prepared to take. I want to make particular mention of Associate Professor Ellen Foyn Brunn, who has led me to a place where I have been able to challenge my presumptions regarding academia, my own ability to express myself, and I now realize she has always been one (or many) steps ahead of me, waiting patiently for me to catch up with my own project. I would also like to make particular mention of Associate Professor Sandra Mladenovitch who taught me more than I can ever express on theatre pedagogy, how to work with actors, and how to think in and of rehearsals. For you two thank you is not enough for what my body feels. Because of them I have been able to undertake a project that has led me to unexpected places, and I have gained insights that will for ever inform my practices not only as director or researcher but as human being too.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LIVING THEATRE & SYMBOLIC CAPITAL By
    OVERTURNING MAMMON: THE LIVING THEATRE & SYMBOLIC CAPITAL by Peter Wood BA, Rhode Island College, 2000 MA, University of Maryland, 2004 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Te Dietrich School of Arts & Sciences in partial fulfllment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2016 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH THE DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS & SCIENCES Tis dissertation was presented by Peter Wood It was defended on March 3, 2016 and approved by Peter Karsten, Professor, History Lisa Jackson-Schebetta, Assistant Professor, Teatre Arts Dissertation Co-Advisor: Michelle Granshaw, Assistant Professor, Teatre Arts Dissertation Co-Advisor: Bruce McConachie, Professor Emeritus, Teatre Arts ii Copyright © by Peter Wood 2016 iii OVERTURNING MAMMON: THE LIVING THEATRE & SYMBOLIC CAPITAL Peter Wood, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2016 Abstract: Overturning Mammon: Te Living Teatre and Symbolic Capital focuses on the frst thirteen years of the Living Teatre, founded by Judith Malina and Julian Beck. Pierre Bourdieu’s theories of cultural production provide the theoretical tools to approach the company as a cultural producer and not only as theatre artists. Te Living Teatre has produced largely unpopular avant-garde and political theatre for seventy years. I argue that the company’s early years demonstrate a growing reserve of symbolic capital that helps explain the company’s longevity. Furthermore, the manner in which certain events in the company’s history have been mythologized, by company members, critics, and scholars, has led to some historically inaccurate accounts. In particular, accounts of the closing of the company’s production of Te Brig in 1963 and the subsequent trial of Beck and Malina in 1964 have often been infuenced by an acceptance of company member’s anecdotal, “tall tales” approach to history rather than historical evidence and archival documents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Routledge Companion to Performance Practitioners Copeau
    This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 23 Sep 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK The Routledge Companion to Performance Practitioners Franc Chamberlain, Bernadette Sweeney Copeau (1879–1949) Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780367815998-3 Mark Evans Published online on: 17 Aug 2020 How to cite :- Mark Evans. 17 Aug 2020, Copeau (1879–1949) from: The Routledge Companion to Performance Practitioners Routledge Accessed on: 23 Sep 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780367815998-3 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. 3 COPEAU (1879–1949) Mark Evans 3.1 The life of Jacques Copeau In the history of the French theatre there are two periods: before and after Copeau. (Albert Camus in Saint-Denis 1982: 32) Jacques Copeau’s international success in the fields of journalism, playwriting, directing, acting and teaching represent a level of achievement unmatched in the history of modern French, and perhaps even modern European, theatre.
    [Show full text]
  • Rht 270-Oublis-Histoire-Du-Theatre
    Soixante-huitième année 2016-II n°270 e but du théâtre de toujours Lest d’ offrir en quelque sorte le miroir à la nature, de montrer à la vertu ses propres traits, sa propre image au vice et aux époques successives leur forme et leur physionomie particulière. Shakespeare, Hamlet, III. 2. SOMMAIRE Dossier : Les oublis de l’histoire du théâtre coordonné par Marion Denizot Introduction 5 L’histoire du théâtre au prisme de l’oubli par Marion Denizot Pratiques et genres non légitimés 19 Le théâtre français d’expression occitane du XVIIe siècle dans l’histoire du théâtre. L’exemple du « Théâtre de Béziers » par Bénédicte Louvat-Molozay 33 Faire parler les architectures et les décors par Sandrine Dubouilh Figure(s) à (re)construire 51 Le genre, une catégorie utile à l’histoire du théâtre du XXe siècle ? Le cas de Jacques Copeau et de Suzanne Bing par Raphaëlle Doyon 71 Louis Jouvet, les raisons d’une relative méconnaissance par Ève Mascarau 83 L’oubli progressif de Roger Blin. Retour sur une présence anecdotique dans l’histoire du théâtre par Mathilde Dumontet Nouvelles archives, nouvelles perspectives ? 95 À l’écoute du bonimenteur dans les archives (XIXe-XXe siècles). Enjeux historiographiques et méthodologiques par Agnès Curel 109 La Mutuelle des artistes et professionnels du spectacle. Une pièce manquante du puzzle de l’histoire de la protection sociale des artistes interprètes par Marie-Ange Rauch Écrire l’histoire du théâtre par la création 117 Un théâtre en voie de disparition. Processus de création et écriture de l’histoire par Yves Jubinville 131 Quand les artistes écrivent une contre-histoire du théâtre sur le plateau par Sophie Lucet VARIA | 143 Saisir le geste du chanteur d’opéra.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Ensemble Tradition: Jacques Copeau, Michel Saint-Denis and Jacques Lecoq
    The French Ensemble Tradition: Jacques Copeau, Michel Saint-Denis and Jacques Lecoq Evans, Mark Postprint deposited in Curve March 2015 Original citation: Evans, M. (2013) 'The French Ensemble Tradition: Jacques Copeau, Michel Saint-Denis and Jacques Lecoq' in John Britton (Ed). Encountering ensemble. London: Bloomsbury ISBN: 9781408152003 http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/encountering-ensemble-9781408152003 Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. CURVE is the Institutional Repository for Coventry University http://curve.coventry.ac.uk/open The French Ensemble Tradition: Jacques Copeau, Michel Saint- Denis and Jacques Lecoq Mark Evans (Coventry University) An ‘ensemblier’, according to the dictionary, is ‘an artist who aims at unity of general effect’. We were ‘ensembliers’. We set out to develop initiative, freedom, and a sense of responsibility in the individual, as long as he or she was ready and able to merge his personal qualities into the ensemble.’ (Saint-Denis 1960: 92) Jacques Copeau and the Vieux-Colombier (1913-1924) Jacques Copeau (1879-1949), through his work as a critic, through his ensemble theatre companies Le Théâtre du Vieux Colombier and Les Copiaus, and later through the influence of his students and disciples1, was to provide one of the most significant and long-lasting challenges to the commercial system dominating theatre in Paris in the early twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Aesthetics and Ethics in the Reception of Noh Theatre in the West
    AESTHETICS AND ETHICS IN THE RECEPTION OF NOH THEATRE IN THE WEST Diego Pellecchia Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosphy (PhD) Royal Holloway, University of London Department of Drama & Theatre Studies September, 2011 2 Declaration of Authorship I Diego Pellecchia hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ______________________ Date: ________________________ 3 Acknowledgements I wish to express my gratitude to my supervisors, Prof. David Wiles and Dr. Libby Worth, and to my advisor, Prof. Matthew Cohen, for providing invaluable assistance, guidance and feedback at all stages of my research. I owe my deepest gratitude to Master-Actor Udaka Michishige, whose efforts in opening the tradition of Noh to foreigners allow me and other students of the International Noh Institute to practice the art and experience the world of Noh. I will be forever indebted to Monique Arnaud, who initiated me to the way of Noh, and encouraged me to embark upon this project, and to Rebecca Ogamo Teele, whose achievements in Noh motivate me to pursue the study of Noh, and greatly inspired this thesis. A special mention goes to Udaka Tatsushige, Udaka Haruna, John Mac Ateer and Dr. Jonah Salz: numerous discussions on Noh and on its transmission in intercultural contexts greatly contributed to the development of central concepts of this thesis. Special thanks to Elena Cazzaro at Biennale ASAC archive for the technical support, and Hara Maiko at Mie Prefectural Museum for facilitating research on Kitasono Katsue.
    [Show full text]
  • Diffuse, Divide, Devise: an Analytical Study of Devised Theatre
    Diffuse, Divide, Devise: An Analytical Study of Devised Theatre By Darcie DeLong, Adam Derrick, Tess Evans-Shell, and Laura Mixon In the year 2014, devised theatre is not a marginal or experimental methodology. The massive artistic and commercial success of the National Theatre in London’s production of War Horse showed the world that devising is not a toy for young actors and free spirits, but simply a way of producing beautiful, meaningful art. Devising stands beside mainstream theatre, like a cousin or younger sibling. But this too is an inadequate picture since devising draws from roots just as ancient as any other form of performance. Devising is merely different. Its backbone is an ensemble of ideas rather than a script. It reveres the human body or spirit the way dramatists revere Shakespeare. The performers hold a stronger artistic voice than the script writer. Although the traditional theatre art form has always respected creative ways to express simple truths, devising perhaps brings a multifaceted perspective that would otherwise not be reached. There continues to be ambiguity when discussing devised theatre. All assert that it is an alternative method of creating a theatrical work, but there are many veins and styles that may or may or may not be lumped together when trying to define it. Allison Oddey, in her work Devising Theatre, has this to say: “A devised theatre product is work that has emerged from and been generated by a group of people working in collaboration” (1). The key feature of a devised piece is its methodology, or how the project comes into being.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Corps Qui Pense, L'esprit Qui Danse
    Le Corps qui pense, l’esprit qui danse - l’acteur dans sa quête de l’unité perdue Sirlei Alaniz To cite this version: Sirlei Alaniz. Le Corps qui pense, l’esprit qui danse - l’acteur dans sa quête de l’unité perdue. Musique, musicologie et arts de la scène. Université de la Sorbonne nouvelle - Paris III, 2014. Français. NNT : 2014PA030082. tel-02118634 HAL Id: tel-02118634 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02118634 Submitted on 3 May 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITE DE LA SORBONNE NOUVELLE PARIS III ECOLE DOCTORALE 267 ‐ ARTS ET MEDIAS UFR D'ETUDES THEATRALES DOCTORAT Sirlei Alaniz Leela Alaniz Le Corps qui pense, l’esprit qui danse – l’acteur dans sa quête de l’unité perdue Thèse dirigée par Monsieur Georges BANU Présentée et soutenue publiquement le 13 octobre 2014 Université la Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris Devant un jury composé de: Monsieur Georges BANU (Professeur émérite Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3) Madame Monique BORI (Professeur émérite Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3) Madame Katia LEGERET (Professeur Université Paris 8 Saint-Denis) Monsieur Jean-François DUSIGNE (Professeur Université Paris 8 Saint-Denis) Monsieur Gilberto ICLE (Professeur Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brésil) Monsieur Serge TROUDE (Expert extérieur – Président de l’Institut Gurdjieff, Paris) Le Corps qui pense, l’esprit qui danse – l’acteur dans sa quête de l’unité perdue Leela Alaniz RÉSUMÉ Cette étude aborde le thème de la quête de vérité menée par l’acteur.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare by Sophie Chiari
    Shakespeare by Sophie Chiari Performances of William Shakespeare's plays on the European continent date back to his lifetime. Since his death in 1616, the playwright has never stopped dominating European literature. His Complete Works have gone through an incredible number of editions from the 18th century onwards. During the second half of the 18th century, he was translated into French and German. Yet in Southern Europe it was not until the 19th century that spectators became genuinely acquainted with his plays. In the 20th century, artists started to engage with the cultural traditions of Shakespeare in a variety of ways. By the 1980s, the playwright had not only become enrolled in the ranks of postcolonial critique, but he was also part and parcel of a European theatrical avant-garde. In today's Europe, newly created festivals as well as Shakespearean adaptations on screen continue to provide challenging interpretations of his plays. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Shakespeare's Immediate Afterlife 2. Shakespeare Lost in 18th-Century Translations 3. Romanticism and Bardolatry in 19th-Century Europe 4. 20th- and 21st-Century Shakespeare: From Politics to Multiculturalism 5. Appendix 1. Translations of Single Works by William Shakespeare 2. Sources and Complete Works Editions 3. Literature 4. Notes Indices Citation Shakespeare's Immediate Afterlife The English author William Shakespeare (1564–1616) (➔ Media Link #ab) wrote poetry (sonnets and narrative poems) as well as 38 plays – 39 if one includes Double Falsehood, that is, Lewis Theobald's (1688–1744) (➔ Media Link #ac) 1727 reconstruction of a lost play, which was based on Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra's (1547–1616) (➔ Media Link #ad) Don Quixote and originally entitled Cardenio.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Writer and Authorship in New Collaborative Performance- Making in the United Kingdom from 2001-2010
    1 The Role of the Writer and Authorship in New Collaborative Performance- Making in the United Kingdom from 2001-2010 Sarah Caroline Sigal Department of Theatre and Performance Goldsmiths College, University of London Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London 18 July 2013 This thesis is available for library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. 2 Acknowledgments I would like to gratefully acknowledge the following people for their guidance, support (both academic and emotional) and generous intellectual and creative contributions. Without it, this PhD would not have been possible. For academic guidance: John Ginman, my supervisor, for all his patience and wisdom during the research and writing of this thesis, as well as John London, Göze Saner and Maria Shevtsova for their advice and assistance during the upgrading process. For the generous cooperation and of the following practitioners who agreed to be interviewed: Jon Bausor, Stephen Brown, Oliver Dimsdale, David Farr, Helen Edmundson, Scott Grahm, Theo Herdman, Steven Hoggett, Kirsty Hounsley, Samuel James, Dawn King, Bryony Lavery, Stuart McLaughlin, Nancy Meckler, Tim Phillips, Ben Power, Liz Ranken, Peter Rankin, Guy Retallack, Ferdy Roberts, Angela Simpson and Polly Teale. For the friendly and helpful administrative assistance in arranging for interviews of the aforementioned practitioners, as well as the viewing of archival material: the staff of the offices of Shared Experience, Frantic Assembly and Filter Theatre.
    [Show full text]
  • The Latinx Theatre Commons: Feminist Decolonization In
    THE LATINX THEATRE COMMONS: FEMINIST DECOLONIZATION IN THE EARLY YEARS OF A MOVEMENT TO TRANSFORM THE NARRATIVE OF THE AMERICAN THEATRE by OLGA P. SANCHEZ SALTVEIT A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Theatre Arts and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2019 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Olga P. Sanchez Saltveit Title: The Latinx Theatre Commons: Feminist Decolonization in the Early Years of a Movement to Transform the Narrative of the American Theatre This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Theatre Arts by: Theresa May Chairperson Michael Malek Najjar Core Member John Schmor Core Member Brian Eugenio Herrera Core Member Michael Hames-García Institutional Representative and Kate Mondloch Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded December 2019 ii © 2019 Olga P. Sanchez Saltveit iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Olga P. Sanchez Saltveit Doctor of Philosophy Department of Theatre Arts December 2019 Title: The Latinx Theatre Commons: Feminist Decolonization in the Early Years of a Movement to Transform the Narrative of the American Theatre The Latinx Theatre Commons (LTC) emerged in 2012 in response and resistance to years of misrepresentation and erasure of Latinx artistic work and presence by the American theatre field in practice and in scholarship. This dissertation is the first comprehensive chronicle and study of the LTC, reviewing the movement’s methods, manifestations, and implications through interviews with key participants and my own reflections as a founding Steering Committee member, balanced against theories of Latinx feminisms, the Commons, and Latin American decolonization.
    [Show full text]
  • IB 2 Summer Assignment IB Theatre 2 (Seniors)
    IB 2 Summer Assignment IB Theatre 2 (Seniors) You will each being completing your IB exams this year. The good thing is that you already completed your research presentation. Think about the skills it took to complete that assignment including: reading, research and exploration. You will be using all of these skills in the final three projects. In order for us to be able to be successful there are a few things you will have to complete this summer. DIRECTOR’S NOTEBOOK (ASSIGNMENT 1) WHAT IS THE PROJECT: Students will choose a published play text they have not previously studied and develop ideas for staging two moments of the play. Students prepare a Director’s Notebook of visuals and words (20 pages maximum). This is a theoretical exercise–the play text is not actually staged. Here is what you have to do this summer: 1. CHOOSE a play that you have not studied. Think about things you have always ​ wanted to direct or focus on playwrights you really like. 2. READ the play: Probably more than once. ​ 3. RESEARCH the Play: Begin writing a mini paper where you answer these questions ​ about the play: a. The Play Text:What is the play you have chosen and why? What is it about? ​ ​ RESEARCH b. Context: Explain the theoretical and/or cultural contexts from which the play text ​ ​ originates. Why was it written? What was happening at the time? Why this play? RESEARCH c. Ideas Presented: Explain the major ideas presented in the play text? How are these ​ presented by the playwright? RESEARCH d.
    [Show full text]