DOCSLIB.ORG

Tourism Demand in Romania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tourism Demand in Romania Tourism Demand in Romania Manuela Sofia STĂNCULESCU1 Research Institute for the Quality of Life, Romanian Academy University of Bucharest Monica MARIN2 Research Institute for the Quality of Life, Romanian Academy Abstract This paper presents an analysis of the evolution and main characteristics of tourism in Romania from the demand side. The study is organized in two parts.The first part focuses on the holiday trips of at least one overnight stay. The approach is comparative, Romania being benchmarked against the EU-27 average. The analysis shows that the touristic demand in Romania has followed a trend parallel with the GDP curve as the touristic demand is strongly correlated with the level of population disposable income. The second part of the analysis refers to the same-day trips (with no overnight stay). Among the same-day visits of the Romanian residents, the domestic trips predominate by far. Main purposes include visiting relatives or friends, shopping, leisure and recreation (including picnic) or medical treatment. Key words: tourism; tourism demand; holiday trips; same-day trips. Introduction This paper analyzes the statistics in the field of tourism from the demand side. ‘Tourist’ is considered here in line with the definition adopted at the UN Conference on Tourism and International Travel (Rome, 1963), as completed at the International Conference on Travel and Tourism Statistics in Ottawa (Canada, 1991), which has been implemented by Eurostat at the European level since 2004. Thus, ‘tourism means the activities of persons travelling to and staying in places outside their usual environment for not more than one consecutive year for leisure, business and other purposes’3 (Eurostat, 2011). ‘Tourist’ or ‘visitor’ is any person travelling to a place other than that of his/her usual environment for less than 1 Senior Researcher with the Research Institute for the Quality of Life, the Romanian Academy and associated professor at the Faculty of Sociology and Social Assistance, University of Bucharest. Contact address: Research Institute for the Quality of Life, Romanian Academy, Calea 13 septembrie, no. 13, 050718, Bucharest, Romania, e-mail: [email protected]. 2 Researcher with the Research Institute for the Quality of Life, the Romanian Academy, Contact address: Research Institute for the Quality of Life, Romanian Academy, Calea 13 septembrie, no. 13, 050718, Bucharest, Romania, e-mail: [email protected]. 3 Other purposes may include rest and recreation, visiting friends and relatives, health treatment, religion/pilgrimages, professional or cultural purposes, etc. Revista Română de Statistică Trim III/2012- Supliment 41 twelve months and whose main purpose of trip is other than the exercise of an activity remunerated from within the place visited.4 The study focuses on the domestic tourism, which ‘comprises the activities of residents of a given country travelling to and staying in places only within that country but outside their usual environment’ (Eurostat, 2011). However, data about the outbound tourism (trips abroad made by the Romanian residents) are also discussed. The analysis is organized in two sections. The first refers to holiday trips, which by definition require the tourist stays at least one night in a collective or private accommodation in the place/country visited. The second section presents data on the same-day trips (with no overnight stay). Holiday trips in Romania 2004-2010 This section is based on the survey ‘Tourism demand of the residents in Romania’, implemented annually by the National Institute for Statistics (NIS), since 2004. The survey is representative at the national level for the population aged 15 years and over. In recent years, in Europe, all types of tourism (short, long, domestic, outbound) have registered positive growth. This is not the case in Romania. In spite of the decision-makers’ rhetoric and of the increasing investments in this industry, the number of holiday trips of the Romanian residents was only 5% larger in 2010 compared to 2004 (11.55 compared with 11 million trips). Actually, it registered a considerable drop in 2006, after which it increased until 2009 when decreased again, most probably, as an effect of the international financial crisis. Table 1 Evolution of holiday trips of Romanian residents 2004-2010 (thousands) Increase in the number of trips over the period (%) 200 201 201 6- 0- 0- 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 200 200 200 4 6 4 All holiday - 60 trips, of 11.005 9.226 7.210 10.182 10.633 12.527 11.547 34 5% % which: % Trip destination Domestic - 61 (within 10.520 8.735 6.688 9.294 9.716 11.651 10.797 36 3% % Romania) % Outbound 44 55 485 492 522 888 917 876 750 8% (abroad) % % Trip duration Short - 87 holiday trips 6.756 5.369 3.824 4.780 5.159 7.107 7.144 43 6% % (1-3 nights) % 4 Eurostat, metadata: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_SDDS/EN/tour_dem_esms.htm 42 Revista Română de Statistică Trim. III/2012 - Supliment Increase in the number of trips over the period (%) 200 201 201 6- 0- 0- 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 200 200 200 4 6 4 Long holiday - 30 trips (4 or 4.249 3.857 3.387 5.402 5.474 5.420 4.403 20 4% % more nights) % Types of holiday trips Long - 28 domestic 3.949 3.496 2.977 4.644 4.687 4.737 3.800 25 -4% % holidays % Long 36 47 101 outbound 300 361 410 757 787 682 602 % % % holidays Short - 89 domestic 6.571 5.239 3.711 4.650 5.029 6.913 6.997 44 6% % holidays % Short - - 31 outbound 185 130 113 130 130 194 147 39 20 % holidays % % Data: Eurostat. Notes: Holiday trips with any purpose: leisure, rest and recreation, visiting friends and relatives, business, professional, treatment, religious, cultural etc. Are not included the trips having as purpose a remunerated activity as well as the trips without overnight stay in the visited place. Compared with 2004, in 2010, Romanians made only 6% more short domestic trips, but 4% less long domestic holidays and 20% less short trips abroad. Only the long outbound tourism (trips abroad of at least 4 overnight stays) has seen a constant and substantial growth. However, in terms of volume, this segment represents only 5% of all holiday trips of at least one overnight stay made by Romania’s residents in 2010. 1% 5% Romania, 2010 EU‐27, 2010 26% 33% 51% 61% 18% 5% Long domestic holidays Long outbound holidays Long domestic holidays Long outbound holidays Short domestic holidays Short outbound holidays Short domestic holidays Short outbound holidays D Figure 1 Shares by length and destination of holiday trips made by Romanian and EU-27 residents Data: Eurostat for Romania and Eurostat (2011) for EU-27. Revista Română de Statistică Trim III/2012- Supliment 43 The small overall growth of the total number of holiday trips by 5% over the period 2004 to 2010 was mainly due to the growth (by 6%) in the segment of short domestic trips, which in terms of volume predominate by far the Romanian tourism. As the above figure shows, the segment of short domestic holidays accounted in 2010 for 61% of all holiday trips, compared with 51% the EU-27 average. Thus, Romanians are still much less likely than other Europeans to spend holidays abroad, although the segment of outbound tourism has considerably increased in volume (by 55% over the period 2004 to 2010). Table 2 Share of domestic holiday trips in all holiday trips and in long holiday trips, Romania (%) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Share of domestic trips in all trips 96 95 93 91 91 93 94 Share of long domestic trips in all long trips 93 91 88 86 86 87 86 Data: Eurostat. Over the entire period, 9 out of 10 holiday trips made by Romanians had a destination within the country borders. With 61% of the holiday trips being short domestic trips and 33% being long domestic trips (in 2010), destinations within the country dominate beyond a doubt in Romanians’ holiday choices. This is commune to most European countries.5 Nonetheless, the share of domestic holiday trips is much higher in Romania compared to the EU-27 average (94% versus 77%, in 2010). The preference for domestic holidays is manifest both for short (1-3 overnight stays) and long (4 or more nights) trips. Figure 2 Share of domestic holiday trips in all holiday trips and in long holiday trips, 2010 Data: Eurostat (2011), p.1. Note: 2009 data for IE and IT. 5 Only residents of the Netherlands, Slovenia, Belgium and Luxembourg tended to spend more holiday trips abroad than at home. (Eurostat, 2011) 44 Revista Română de Statistică Trim. III/2012 - Supliment Characteristics of the domestic holiday trips The standard European survey on tourism demand includes some information regarding accommodation, mode of transportation, and expenditures. However, each country may tailor the national survey according to its conditions and priorities. The Romanian survey included data about accommodation only in 2005-2007 and has not considered mode of transportation. However, it provides data about the touristic area of destination and trip organizer. Table 3 Characteristics of domestic holiday trips made by Romanian residents 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 All domestic holiday trips, of which: Number 10.519.668 8.734.554 6.688.193 9.294.237 9.716.392 11.650.634 % 100 100 100 100 100 100 Trip duration (%) Short holiday trips (1-3 61,3 59,1 54,6 49,3 50,9 58,9 overnight stays) Long holiday trips (4 or 38,7 40,9 45,4 50,7 49,1 41,1 more nights) Trip organizer (%) On own account 93,2 93,8 94,1 93,3 94,6 95,0 Travel agencies 2,4 2,2 2,5 3,2 2,7 2,4 Others 4,4 4,0 3,4 3,5 2,7 2,7 Touristic areas of destination (%) Mountain 18,1 18,9 19,4 25,0 25,5 25,1 Seaside 11,0 11,7 12,3 15,5 14,5 12,6 Spas 1,9 1,8 3 2,4 2,6 2,5 Danube Delta 0,6 0,4 0,6 0,9 0,4 0,9 Diverse circuits 1,5 1,1 1,2 1,1 0,9 0,8 Other touristic areas 66,9 66,0 63,5 55,1 56,2 58,1 Data: NIS (2010).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ROMANIA's ADVANTAGES in the COMPETITION of the EUROPEAN TOURISM Andreea Băltăreţu Abstract Nowadays, Romanian Tourism, Ju
    364 Romania’s advantages in the competition of the european tourism ROMANIA’S ADVANTAGES IN THE COMPETITION OF THE EUROPEAN TOURISM Andreea Băltăreţu Abstract Nowadays, Romanian tourism, just like the global tourism, is characterized by a strong competition among tourist destinations. Therefore, travel destinations (resorts or countries) need more and more a new model of tourism policy able to influence their competitiveness position under the current competitiveness conditions. Tourism represents a key domain in which our country could excel. Romania is one of the most diversified countries when it comes to the tourist products that it offers (natural and anthropic resources, unique flora and fauna European biodiversity). Keywords: competitiveness, advantages, tourism, tourist destination JEL Classification: L83, O10 1. Introduction Although from an economic point of view the notion of tourism competitiveness defined as being “the capacity of dealing with a competition in an efficient and rentable manner inside the tourist market” can be integrated in the notion used by the field literature, tourism’s specific content determines a complex and multidimensional approach of this concept. This is necessary if taking into account a series of peculiar features of the tourist product. First of all, we must highlight the fact that the multitude of components that are used in conceiving and trading a tourist product transformed the development of its competitiveness into a complex process realized with the help of: both the tourist resort’s competitiveness and that realized at the level of each type of tourist enterprise: direct tourist service provider: transportation, accommodation, alimentation, recreation, treatment or intermediary: tour operator, travel agency etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Tradenet Presentation Chamber of Kavala 13 3 2012
    PROJECT BLACK SEA TRADENET DOING BUSINESS WITH ROMANIA RODICA BELTEU – CONSTANTA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, INDUSTRY, SHIPPING AND AGRICULTURE WORKSHOP DOBRICH, BULGARIA, 13-14 MARCH 2012 COUNTRY PROFILE Official name: ROMANIA Flag and coat of arms: Legal system: Romania is a parliamentary republic. The Parliament represents the legislative power in the state. It is a bicameral 471-seat Parliament composed of the Senate (137 seats) and the Chamber of Deputies (334 seats). The Government, led by a prime-minister appointed by the president of the country, is the executive power. Geographical location: Romania is located in the geographical center of Europe (southeastern of Central Europe), on the Black Sea coast. It lies on north of the Balkanic peninsula, inside and outside the Carpathian arch, on the lower Danube (1075 km) and by the Black Sea. Frontiers: The length of Romania’s frontiers is of 3150 km, of which 1085.5 km are terrestrial frontiers, and 2064.5 km water frontiers. Romania shares a border with Hungary and Serbia to the west, Ukraine and Moldova to the northeast and east, and Bulgaria to the south. Area: With a surface area of 238,391 km², Romania is the largest country in southeastern Europe and the twelfth-largest in Europe. 1 COUNTRY PROFILE COUNTRY PROFILE Relief: Romania’s relief is composed of three main levels, namely the high level of the Carpathian Mountains, the middle level of the Sub-Carpathians, hills and plateaus, and the lowlands of plains, meadows and Danube Delta. These major relief forms are disposed in balanced concentric areas: 31% mountains, 36% hills and 33% lowlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Usaid and Child Welfare Reform in Romania
    USAID AND CHILD WELFARE REFORM IN ROMANIA CHALLENGES, SUCCESSES, AND LEGACY JULY 2006 This report was produced for the Social Transition Team, Office of Democracy, Governance and Social Transition of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID/DGST/E&E) by Aguirre International, a division of JBS International, Inc. It was prepared under Task Order 12 of the Global Evaluation and Monitoring (GEM) IQC, Contract No. FAO-I-00-99-00010-00. The authors are Lucia Correll, Tim Correll, and Marius Predescu. USAID AND CHILD WELFARE REFORM IN ROMANIA Challenges, Successes, and Legacy The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Romanian Child Welfare Legacy Report TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYM LIST.......................................................................................................................... V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ IX Background on USAID’s Child Welfare Programs in Romania .............................................. ix The Politics of International Adoption..................................................................................... xi The Legacy ............................................................................................................................ xi Key Lessons Learned ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Romania, December 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Romania, December 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: ROMANIA December 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Romania. Short Form: Romania. Term for Citizen(s): Romanian(s). Capital: Bucharest (Bucureşti). Click to Enlarge Image Major Cities: As of 2003, Bucharest is the largest city in Romania, with 1.93 million inhabitants. Other major cities, in order of population, are Iaşi (313,444), Constanţa (309,965), Timişoara (308,019), Craiova (300,843), Galati (300,211), Cluj-Napoca (294,906), Braşov (286,371), and Ploeşti (236,724). Independence: July 13, 1878, from the Ottoman Empire; kingdom proclaimed March 26, 1881; Romanian People’s Republic proclaimed April 13, 1948. Public Holidays: Romania observes the following public holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1), Epiphany (January 6), Orthodox Easter (a variable date in April or early May), Labor Day (May 1), Unification Day (December 1), and National Day and Christmas (December 25). Flag: The Romanian flag has three equal vertical stripes of blue (left), yellow, and red. Click to Enlarge Image HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early Human Settlement: Human settlement first occurred in the lands that now constitute Romania during the Pleistocene Epoch, which began about 600,000 years ago. About 5500 B.C. the region was inhabited by Indo-European people, who in turn gave way to Thracian tribes. Today’s Romanians are in part descended from the Getae, a Thracian tribe that lived north of the Danube River. During the Bronze Age (about 2200 to 1200 B.C.), these Thraco-Getian tribes engaged in agriculture, stock raising, and trade with inhabitants of the Aegean Sea coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanian Exceptionalism 2016 Irina Oana Gheorgh
    Explaining the Persistence of Unprofessional Bureaucracy in a Modernising State: Romanian Exceptionalism A Thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Faculty of Humanities 2016 Irina Oana Gheorghe Alliance Manchester Business School/People, Management and Organisations Table of Contents Chapter 1: The Challenge of Modernising Public Administration in Romania 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… 9 1.1 The problem with Romanian Public Administration................... 13 1.2 Aims and Objectives.................................................................... 16 1.3 Structure of the Thesis…………………………………………………………… 22 1.4 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………… 26 Chapter 2: Public Administration in Romania: The legacy of the Past 2.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 28 2.2 Institutional Theories…………………………………………………………..… 29 2.3 International level of analysis for Public Management…………… 39 2.4 European/Regional level of analysis of Public Management…… 48 2.5 Adapting Managerialism to Public Administration………………… 53 2.6 Towards a Framework of Analysis…………………………………………… 59 2.7 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………… 61 Chapter 3: Research Data and Methodology 3.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 63 3.2 Institutionalism and Method…………………………………………………… 66 3.3 Research Design and Method………………………………………………… 67 3.4 Developing the Research Methods: Elite interviewing…………… 73 3.5 The use of Secondary Data……………………………………………………… 75 3.6 Developing the Interview Questions……………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Document About Romania
    About Romania Romania (Romanian: România, IPA: [ro.mɨni.a]) is a country in Southeastern Europe sited in a historic region that dates back to antiquity. It shares border with Hungary and Serbia to the west, Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova to the northeast, and Bulgaria to the south. Romania has a stretch of sea coast along the Black Sea. It is located roughly in the lower basin of the Danube and almost all of the Danube Delta is located within its territory. Romania is a parliamentary unitary state. As a nation-state, the country was formed by the merging of Moldavia and Wallachia in 1859 and it gained recognition of its independence in 1878. Later, in 1918, they were joined by Transylvania, Bukovina and Bessarabia. At the end of World War II, parts of its territories (roughly the present day Moldova) were occupied by USSR and Romania became a member of Warsaw Pact. With the fall of the Iron Curtain in 1989, Romania started a series of political and economic reforms that peaked with Romania joining the European Union. Romania has been a member of the European Union since January 1, 2007, and has the ninth largest territory in the EU and with 22 million people [1] it has the 7th largest population among the EU member states. Its capital and largest city is Bucharest (Romanian: Bucureşti /bu.kureʃtʲ/ (help·info)), the sixth largest city in the EU with almost 2 million people. In 2007, Sibiu, a large city in Transylvania, was chosen as European Capital of Culture.[2] Romania joined NATO on March 29, 2004, and is also a member of the Latin Union, of the Francophonie and of OSCE.
    [Show full text]
  • Bk Inno 001904.Pdf
    LESSON NOTES Intermediate S1 #1 Giving Your Opinion in Romanian CONTENTS 2 Romanian 2 English 3 Vocabulary 4 Sample Sentences 5 Vocabulary Phrase Usage 6 Grammar 10 Cultural Insight # 1 COPYRIGHT © 2018 INNOVATIVE LANGUAGE LEARNING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ROMANIAN 1. Profesor În opinia lui Durkheim, sociologia este o știință distinctă și Petrescu: autonomă. 2. Marcel: Domnule profesor, mă scuzați, cum ați zis că se numește lucrarea de bază scrisă de Durkheim? 3. Profesor Da, "Regulile metodei sociologice", publicată în anul 1895. Petrescu: 4. Marcel: Mulțumesc. Aș vrea să o citesc. Credeți că sunt șanse să o găsesc la biblioteca universității? 5. Profesor Da, sigur. Dacă nu o găsiți, vă rog să mă contactați. Aș vrea Petrescu: să pregătiți pentru seminar o prezentare în perechi a punctelor cheie din această lucrare. 6. Simona: Mă scuzați, aș putea face eu echipă cu Marcel? 7. Profesor Da, sigur. Marcel, ești de acord că lucrezi cu Simona și să Petrescu: prezentați săptămâna viitoare? 8. Marcel: Sigur. Am însă o problemă, nu mă pot pregăti pentru următorul seminar deoarece am un alt examen la un curs opțional. Se poate amâna pentru încă o săptămână? Mulțumesc. 9. Profesor Da, pentru mine este în ordine. Stabilește și cu Simona și Petrescu: dați-mi de veste dacă vă pot ajuta cu ceva. ENGLISH 1. Professor According to Durkheim, sociology is a distinct and Petrescu: autonomous science. CONT'D OVER ROMANIANPOD101.COM INTERMEDIATE S1 #1 - GIVING YOUR OPINION IN ROMANIAN 2 2. Marcel: Professor, excuse me, what did you say Durkheim's basic work is called? 3. Professor Well it's "The Rules of the Sociological Method," published in Petrescu: 1895.
    [Show full text]
  • ROMANIA Country Case Study on the Integrated Delivery of Long-Term Care
    ROMANIA Country case study on the integrated delivery of long-term care WHO Regional Office for Europe series on integrated delivery of long-term care ROMANIA Country case study on the integrated delivery of long-term care WHO Regional Office for Europe series on integrated delivery of long-term care Abstract This report describes the main findings and policy pointers of an assessment of the current conditions of integrated delivery of long-term health and social services in Romania. The country has advanced in enacting legislation to regulate the provision of long-term care. Service provision is limited to social services, whereas the health component is not defined by law. The current provision of long-term care is insufficient, services are fragmented and there are no defined pathways of care. The system relies heavily on families to provide care, but services for unpaid caregivers are underdeveloped. There is an acute shortage of workers, caused by migration of workers to other European countries. Keywords LONG-TERM CARE HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE AGED CAREGIVERS INTEGRATED DELIVERY SYSTEMS WOMEN’S HEALTH SERVICES ROMANIA Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe UN City, Marmorvej 51 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office website (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest). © World Health Organization 2020 All rights reserved. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full.
    [Show full text]
  • National Report – Romania
    Study of Volunteering in the European Union Country Report Romania NATIONAL REPORT – ROMANIA Study of Volunteering in the European Union Country Report Romania CONTENTS 1 GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT VOLUNTEERING IN ROMANIA ........................................... 1 1.1 History and contextual background ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Definitions....................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Number and profile of volunteers ................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Number and type of voluntary organisations ................................................................................. 8 1.5 Main voluntary activities ............................................................................................................... 10 2 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Main public bodies and other organisations involved in volunteering .......................................... 10 2.2 Policies ......................................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Programmes ................................................................................................................................. 12 3 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Tourism in Romania and Adopting Best Practices from Other States
    Turismo rural en Rumanía y adopción de las mejores prácticas de otros estados Răbonțu Cecilia-Irina et al RURAL TOURISM IN ROMANIA AND ADOPTING BEST PRACTICES FROM OTHER STATES TURISMO RURAL EN RUMANÍA Y ADOPCIÓN DE LAS MEJORES PRÁCTICAS DE OTROS ESTADOS Răbonțu Cecilia-Irina Babucea Ana-Gabriela Bălăcescu Aniela ”Constantin Brâncuși” University of Târgu Jiu, Romania [email protected] Material original autorizado para su primera publicación en la revista académica REDMARKA. Revista Digital de Marketing Aplicado. Recibido: 17 Febrero 2017 Aceptado: 5 Junio 2017 Abstract Tourism is one of the important pillars of many national economies. Practicing the tourism has a multiplier effect on several industries, being interdependent with the food industry, communications, transport industry etc. Worldwide, all rural areas face the same problems: economic decline, environmental degradation, poverty of population or gradual loss of national identity. Its population is aged, young people preferring to migrate to cities. In this context, the villages are struggling to maintain its viability. REDMARKA UIMA-Universidad de A Coruña – CIECID Año X, Número 18, (2017), v I pp. 5-18 http://www.redmarka.net/ ISSN 1852-2300 5 Turismo rural en Rumanía y adopción de las mejores prácticas de otros estados Răbonțu Cecilia-Irina et al Tourism is one of the sectors that can contribute to resuscitate villages. Practicing rural tourism was developed in response to human needs, subjected to daily increasing stress, to recreate the economic needs of these areas and the concern to preserve the environment and tradition. This paper aims to analyze the trends and changes rural tourism in Romania, namely how tourism activity has evolved, but the direction he is going, too.
    [Show full text]
  • Dracula Tourism in Romania
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bournemouth University Research Online The Undead and Dark Tourism: Dracula Tourism in Romania Duncan Light This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in Dark Tourism: Practice and Interpretation on 14 July 2016, available online: (ISBN: 9781472452436; https://www.routledge.com/Dark-Tourism-Practice-and-interpretation/Hooper- Lennon/p/book/9781472452436) This work should be cited as: Light, D. (2017) ‘The undead and dark tourism: Dracula tourism in Romania’, in G. Hooper and J.J. Lennon (eds) Dark Tourism: Practice and Interpretation, Routledge, Abingdon, 121-133 Introduction Although I have been researching Dracula tourism (the visiting of places in Transylvania associated with the Count Dracula of fiction and cinema) for more than a decade, I have not previously examined it in terms of dark tourism since, to my mind, there was little direct connection between such tourism and death or human suffering. However, conceptions of dark tourism are continually evolving and the phenomenon is now increasingly defined in terms of the ‘macabre’, meaning that dark tourism now embraces a wider range of sites and experiences which are not directly associated with death. I wish to begin this chapter by considering the changing definitions of dark tourism with particular reference to the notion of the macabre as a criterion for defining the phenomenon. I then want to examine Dracula tourism in Romania from the perspectives of both supply and demand. In terms of supply I argue that there is almost no deliberate provision of tourist experiences based on Dracula, so that identifying Dracula tourism as a form of dark tourism is problematic.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Tourism in Romania
    Economy Transdisciplinarity Cognition Vol. 20 , 72 - 78 www .ugb.ro/etc Issue 1 /201 7 Rural T ourism in Romania Daniel GHERASIM, Adrian GHERASIM George Bacovia University , Bacau, Romania [email protected] [email protected] Abstract : Rural tourism has a strong affection because it is not an offer of any kind or consumption. As long as this element is not forgotten or neglected, there will be no danger of destroying the environment or culling negative factors in the culture of the village or area by overcoming ecological limits. Tradition and ambience of rural areas are the starting point for the development and sustainable implementation of rural tourism in our country. Keywords: Rural tourism, village , tradition Introduction The legends, such as Count Dracula's or the authentic history of Romania, are all testimonies of a fascinating past. Such testimonies can be found in Transylvanian wooden churches with high roofs. The first signs of human life on the present Romanian territory were found in the Carpathian Mountains and date back to about 600,000 BC 1. The Concept of Rural T ourism Tourism puts into value and exploits economically the unique treasure made up of the richness created by nature and cli mate, or the legacy of history, folklore and civilization. Without the tourist movement, the natural, cultural, and historical wealth of a country will never be able to be the object of an economic activity capable of generating income. [ 1 ] Of these branc hes of tourism, rural tourism is the point of interest, because tourists often feel best in the middle of nature, at a real pension, surrounded by hospitable people.
    [Show full text]