DOCSLIB.ORG

Ocean Wilderness in Theory and Practice a Dissertation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ocean Wilderness In Theory And Practice Item Type Thesis Authors Barr, Bradley W. Download date 11/10/2021 04:03:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/9168 OCEAN WILDERNESS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Bradley W. Barr, M.S. Fairbanks, Alaska December 2012 UMI Number: 3537848 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3537848 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 OCEAN WILDERNESS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE By Bradley W. Barr RECOMMENDED: Dr. David Koester Dr. Andrew Kliskey, Advisory Committee Co-Chair Dr. Gordon Kruse, Advisory Committee Co-Chair Dr. Milo Adkison, Chair, Graduate Program in Fisheries Division APPROVED: Dr. I^ichael Castellini Dead, Sc Dr. John Eichelberger Dean of the Graduatp School / ^ ' / 2 Abstract Wilderness preservation has been an important focus of resource conservation since the dwindling number of wild places was perceived by some as losing a valued part of our collective natural and cultural heritage. While wilderness preservation efforts have been almost entirely focused on the land, recently there has been growing interest in “ocean wilderness.” However, implementation has been constrained by the lack of a common vision of how “wilderness” is applied to the ocean, and how such areas should be managed and preserved. The purpose of this work was to identify and evaluate potential definitions of ocean wilderness and the values and qualities such areas possess, and to determine how they might be effectively identified and managed to preserve their wilderness character. This research focused on articulating a robust definition for “wilderness waters,” within the context of how wilderness is currently conceived and articulated in law and policy, as well as evaluating how such areas might be most appropriately identified and managed. Extensive inventories were conducted of existing ocean wilderness areas, focused on North America, to determine what currently exists, how these areas are managed, and how future ocean wilderness designations should be prioritized. A survey was conducted, targeting resource managers and scientists, to identify preferences and perceptions of ocean wilderness and its potential stewardship. The survey results suggested that coastal waters possessed considerable values and qualities of wilderness, particularly areas adjacent to existing designated wilderness, that certain human uses might be appropriately permitted, and that there was much support for expanding the area of coastal waters designated as wilderness. The research also suggested that the North American Arctic might offer many opportunities for preserving ocean wilderness, in close collaboration with the Indigenous communities in this region. A number of recommendations were offered including that priority should be given to evaluating and designating areas adjacent to designated coastal wilderness areas, that the existing legal and policy framework in North America can be effectively used to expand the IV “wilderness waters” system, and that more work needs to be done to build the constituencies of support essential to accomplish this task. Table of Contents Page Signature Page ............................................................................................................................ i Title Page...................................................................................................................................... ii Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... v List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. x List of Tables .................................................................................................................................xii List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................xiv Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................xv Chapter 1 Ocean Wilderness - Introduction ........................................................................... 1 1.1 The Challenges Surrounding Ocean Wilderness ...................................................... 1 1.2 Study Objectives and Structure of the Dissertation.................................................. 9 1.3 Theoretical Foundation.................................................................................................. 13 1.4 Addressing the “Punctuated” History of Ocean Wilderness .................................. 20 Chapter 2 What’s in a Name? - Terrestrial Wilderness Definitions and their Implications for Defining Ocean Wilderness ............................................................................................. 22 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 22 2.2 Learning from Terrestrial Wilderness Definitions .................................................... 23 2.3 Definitions in the North American Context ............................................................... 44 2.4 Making the Leap to Defining Ocean Wilderness ...................................................... 49 2.5 First Attempt at a Consensus Definition ..................................................................... 52 2.6 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 56 Chapter 3 “What We Think it Is” - Perceptions of Wilderness and their Application to Ocean and Coastal Waters ...................................................................................................... 61 3.1 Introduction: “What have we said it is?” .................................................................. 61 3.2 Context: Potential Insights from Existing Surveys and Research ........................ 62 3.2.1 The National Survey of Recreation and the Environment ......................... 62 3.2.2 Specific Studies of Wilderness Perceptions ....................................................67 3.2.3 Wilderness Values, Demographics, and User Communities ..................... 70 3.2.4 Surveys of Wilderness in MPAs. ................................................................... 72 3.3 The Ocean Wilderness Survey .................................................................................... 74 3.3.1 Sample ....................................................................................................................75 3.3.2 Content of the Survey Instrument ................................................................... 77 3.3.3 Analysis .............................................................................................................. 81 3.3.4 Results....................................................................................................................85 3.3.4.1 Does Ocean Wilderness Exist? ........................................................ 85 3.3.4.2 Elements of Ocean Wilderness ........................................................ 85 3.3.4.3 Attributes of Ocean Wilderness ....................................................... 86 3.3.4.4 Compatible Human Use of Ocean Wilderness .............................. 94 3.3.4.5 Non-Use Values of Ocean Wilderness ...........................................101 3.3.4.6 Perceptions of Ocean Wilderness Quality from Photographs.... 102 3.3.4.7 Attitudes Regarding Ocean Wilderness .................................. 110 3.3.4.8 Respondent Demographics ...............................................................112 3.3.5 Discussion .............................................................................................................118 3.4 “Ocean Wilderness Attachment” ................................................................................. 127 3.5 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 130 Chapter 4 “What It Is Now” - Existing Wilderness Waters ............................................... 133 4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................133 4.2 Legislative and Policy Review of Wilderness Waters ............................................. 134 4.3 Jurisdiction over Submerged Lands and Wilderness Designations .................... 138 4.4 Wilderness Waters Inventory ....................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Beaufort Seas West To

    Beaufort Seas West To

    71° 162° 160° 158° 72° U LEGEND 12N 42W Ch u $ North Slope Planning Area ckchi Sea Conservation System Unit (Offset for display) Pingasagruk (abandoned) WAINWRIGHT Atanik (Abandoned) Naval Arctic Research Laboratory USGS 250k Quad Boundaries U Point Barrow I c U Point Belcher 24N Township Boundaries y 72° Akeonik (Ruins) Icy Cape U 17W C 12N Browerville a Trans-Alaska Pipeline p 39W 22N Solivik Island e Akvat !. P Ikpilgok 20W Barrow Secondary Roads (unpaved) a Asiniak!. Point s MEADE RIVER s !. !. Plover Point !. Wainwright Point Franklin !. Brant Point !. Will Rogers and Wiley Post Memorial Whales1 U Point Collie Tolageak (Abandoned) 9N Point Marsh Emaiksoun Lake Kilmantavi (Abandoned) !. Kugrua BayEluksingiak Point Seahorse Islands Bowhead Whale, Major Adult Area (June-September) 42W Kasegaluk Lagoon West Twin TekegakrokLake Point ak Pass Sigeakruk Point uitk A Mitliktavik (Abandoned) Peard Bay l U Ikroavik Lake E Tapkaluk Islands k Wainwright Inlet o P U Bowhead Whale, Major Adult Area (May) l 12N k U i i e a n U re Avak Inlet Avak Point k 36W g C 16N 22N a o Karmuk Point Tutolivik n U Elson Lagoon t r !. u a White (Beluga) Whale, Major Adult Area (September) !. a !. 14N m 29W 17W t r 17N u W Nivat Point o g P 32W Av k a a Nokotlek Point !. 26W Nulavik l A s P v a a s Nalimiut Point k a k White (Beluga) Whale, Major Adult Area (May-September) MEADE RIVER p R s Pingorarok Hill BARROW U a Scott Point i s r Akunik Pass Kugachiak Creek v ve e i !.
  • Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area

    Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area

    OCS Report BOEM 2020-003 Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Headquarters This page intentionally left blank. OCS Report BOEM 2020-003 Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area January 2020 Authors: Zhen Li Caryn Smith In-House Document by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Division of Environmental Sciences Sterling, VA US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Headquarters This page intentionally left blank. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Oil Spill Risk Analysis web page (https://www.boem.gov/environment/environmental- assessment/oil-spill-risk-analysis-reports). CITATION Li Z, Smith C. 2020. Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area. Sterling (VA): U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. OCS Report BOEM 2020-003. 130 p. ABOUT THE COVER This graphic depicts the study area in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas and boundary segments used in the oil spill risk analysis model for the the Beaufort Sea Planning Area. Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ...............................................................................................................................................
  • Bering Sea NWFC/NMFS

    Bering Sea NWFC/NMFS

    VOLUME 1. MARINE MAMMALS, MARINE BIRDS VOLUME 2, FISH, PLANKTON, BENTHOS, LITTORAL VOLUME 3, EFFECTS, CHEMISTRY AND MICROBIOLOGY, PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY VOLUME 4. GEOLOGY, ICE, DATA MANAGEMENT Environmental Assessment of the Alaskan Continental Shelf July - Sept 1976 quarterly reports from Principal Investigators participatingin a multi-year program of environmental assessment related to petroleum development on the Alaskan Continental Shelf. The program is directed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under the sponsorship of the Bureau of Land Management. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES Boulder, Colorado November 1976 VOLUME 1 CONTENTS MARINE MAMMALS vii MARINE BIRDS 167 iii MARINE MAMMALS v MARINE MAMMALS Research Unit Proposer Title Page 34 G. Carleton Ray Analysis of Marine Mammal Remote 1 Douglas Wartzok Sensing Data Johns Hopkins U. 67 Clifford H. Fiscus Baseline Characterization of Marine 3 Howard W. Braham Mammals in the Bering Sea NWFC/NMFS 68 Clifford H. Fiscus Abundance and Seasonal Distribution 30 Howard W. Braham of Marine Mammals in the Gulf of Roger W. Mercer Alaska NWFC/NMFS 69 Clifford H. Fiscus Distribution and Abundance of Bowhead 33 Howard W. Braham and Belukha Whales in the Bering Sea NWFC/NMFS 70 Clifford H. Fiscus Distribution and Abundance of Bow- 36 Howard W. Braham et al head and Belukha Whales in the NWFC/NMFS Beaufort and Chukchi Seas 194 Francis H. Fay Morbidity and Mortality of Marine 43 IMS/U. of Alaska Mammals 229 Kenneth W. Pitcher Biology of the Harbor Seal, Phoca 48 Donald Calkins vitulina richardi, in the Gulf of ADF&G Alaska 230 John J. Burns The Natural History and Ecology of 55 Thomas J.
  • A BILL to Designate Certain Lands As Wilderness

    A BILL to Designate Certain Lands As Wilderness

    CONGRESS *>J"k<4 1STSESSXO* 3014 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER 9,1969 Mr. JACKSON (for himself, Mr. ANDERSON, Mr. GRAVEL, Mr. MAGNUSON, Mr. MONTOYA, and Mr. STEVENS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affaira A BILL To designate certain lands as wilderness. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 lives of the United States of America in Congress assemble^ 3 That, (a) in accordance with section 3 (c) of the Wilderness 4 Act (78 Stat. 890; 16 U.S.C. 1132 (c) ), the following lands 5 are hereby designated as wilderness, and shall be adininis^ 6 tered by the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with th>$ 7 provisions of the Wilderness Act: : 8 (1) certain lands in the Hart Mountain Rational 9 Antelope Refuge, Oregon, which comprise about forty- 10 eight thousand acres and which are depicted on a map 11 entitled "Hart Mountain National Antelope, Refuge II 2 1 Wilderness—Proposed", dated August 1967, which shall 2 be known as the "Hart Mountain National Antelope 3 Refuge Wilderness"; 4 (2) certain lands in the Bering Sea, Bogoslof, and 5 Tuxedni National Wildlife Refuges, Alaska, as depicted ti on maps entitled "Bering Sea Wilderness—Proposed", 7 "Bogoslof Wilderness—Proposed", and "Tuxedni Wil- 8 derness—Proposed", dated August 1967, and the lands 9 comprising the St. Lazaria, Hazy Islands, and For- 10 rester Island National Wildlife Refuges, Alaska, as 11 depicted on maps entitled "Southeastern Alaska Pro- 12 posed Wilderness Areas", dated August 1967, which 13 shall be known as the "Bering Sea Wilderness", "Bogos- 14 lof Wilderness", "Tuxedni Wilderness", "St.
  • Beaufort Sea: Hypothetical Very Large Oil Spill and Gas Release

    Beaufort Sea: Hypothetical Very Large Oil Spill and Gas Release

    OCS Report BOEM 2020-001 BEAUFORT SEA: HYPOTHETICAL VERY LARGE OIL SPILL AND GAS RELEASE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska OCS Region OCS Study BOEM 2020-001 BEAUFORT SEA: HYPOTHETICAL VERY LARGE OIL SPILL AND GAS RELEASE January 2020 Author: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska OCS Region U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska OCS Region REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (www.boem.gov/newsroom/library/alaska-scientific-and-technical-publications, and click on 2020). CITATION BOEM, 2020. Beaufort Sea: Hypothetical Very Large Oil Spill and Gas Release. OCS Report BOEM 2020-001 Anchorage, AK: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Alaska OCS Region. 151 pp. Beaufort Sea: Hypothetical Very Large Oil Spill and Gas Release BOEM Contents List of Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 What is a VLOS? ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 What Could Precipitate a VLOS? ................................................................................................ 1 1.2.1 Historical OCS and Worldwide
  • Calendar No. 589 91St CONGRESS ) SENATE EXPORT 1St Session J No

    Calendar No. 589 91St CONGRESS ) SENATE EXPORT 1St Session J No

    Calendar No. 589 91sT CONGRESS ) SENATE EXPORT 1st Session J No. 91-504 HART MOUNTAIN NATIONA^ ANTELOPE REFUGE, ETC- DECEMBER 9, 1909.—Ordered to be printed Mr. JACKSON, from the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, submitted the following REPORT . [To accompany S. 3014] The Committee on. Interior and Insular A.ff airs',:; to. which,,was re- ferred the bill (S. 3014.)..to designate.certain ,lund.s.iu tl.ie IIa-r,t JMtoun-. tain National Antelope* Refuge, =the MalheurlKa^ipiiaji W.ijdiife Rpfr uge, the Three Arph.Rqc.ks and Oregon •Xs.la.n.ds National .Wildlife Refuges, all in Oregon; ..the-Bering .Sea,... ^ogqslpf, Tuxedrii,. ^t. Lazaria, Hazy Islands, ^nd Forrester IsJta,nd,,Jtfationa,l Wildlife Ref- uges, all hi Alaska; the Copalis, Flattery; Rbcljs.andQujll}»y#te Neer dies National ^ildlife Rpfug^in^he.^iatfl'pijiV^aslung^nj'wid the Bitter Lafce National Wildlife Refuge/in,.j^W ¥^exjipo, as wilUerness, having considered tlie same, renorts fayprably.;t)iereon with amend- ments and recommends that the bill as amen^1 ' ' PURPOSE , :•;•;•; .-.- • -i I . If! Tlxis >ill, S, .301*, iiiuced'>ypuld /wve^desighate.d as.\iuijts of the National Wilderness' 'reservation System, the Hart Mountain( National Antelope,Refu the. Malheuy Natioinal WildlifeJRefuge,' the Three Arch Ixpcks a«h Oregon Islands National ^•'n'1i>'^ " <--*'--1-"1 -*-1— -:'-- - «y- .in Wildlife Refuses in ther State..of jWasinn'gftni,'and. the.Biljter Lake. National Wildlife Refuge in New -Mexico. AJl of the.Uwids.are prep- ently within the National .Wildjife Refjige, System, and no land acquisition costs are involved. TJiege. wilderness.; prpposftls.
  • Environmental Characterization and Biological Utilization of Peard Bay

    Environmental Characterization and Biological Utilization of Peard Bay

    ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION AND BIOLOGICAL UTILIZATION OF PEARD BAY Edited by Patrick J. Kinney Kinnetic Laboratories, Inc. 403 West Eighth Avenue P. O. BOX 104239 Anchorage, Alaska 99510 Final Report Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program Research Unit 641 December 1985 97 PROJECT TEAM Project Management Donald E. Wilson, Ph.D. KLI Project Manager Samuel Stoker, Ph.D. KLI Assistant Project Manager Steve Pace, M.S. KL I Operations Manager Christine Brown, B.S. KL I Editorial Literature Review Jerome Cura, Ph.D. EG&G Task Leader Meteorology and Oceanoqraphy Donald E. Wilson, Ph.D. KLI Task Leader William Gahlen, M.S. EG&G Physical Synthesis Mark Savoie, M.S. KLI Physical Synthesis Walt Pharo, B.S. EG&G Field Studies Toby Goddard, B.S. KLI Field Studies Marine Mammals Samuel Stoker, Ph.D. KLI Task Leader/Field Studies Robert Gill, M.S. Biota Field Studies Colleen Handel, M.S. Bi ota Field Studies Peter Connors, Ph.D. Biota Field Studies Birds Robert Gill, M.S. Biota Task Leader Coleen Handel, M.S. Biota Field and Laboratory Studies Peter Connors. Ph.D. Biota Field Studies Fish John Hall, Ph.D. Sol ace Task Leader Scott Edson, M.S. Consultant Field Studies Marty Stevenson, M.A. KLI Synthesis 99 Invertebrates Steve Pace, M.S. KLI Task Leader Garry Gillingham, B.A. KLI Identifications Allen Fukuyama, M.A. MLML Identifications Kenneth Coyle, M.S. UAF Identifications Nutrients and Primary Productivity Osmund Helm-Hanson, Ph.D. S10 Task Leader Chris Hewes, M.S. S10 Field and Laboratory Studies Paul Mankiewitz, Ph.D. GG Carbon Isotopes Svnthesis.
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132

    Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132

    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L

    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L

    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
  • Alaska Marine Ecosystem Forum

    Alaska Marine Ecosystem Forum

    Alaska Marine Ecosystem Forum MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Alaska Marine Ecosystem Forum Memorandum of Understanding MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Between U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and THE NORTH PACIFIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR U.S. MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR U.S. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE U.S FOREST SERVICE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. COAST GUARD and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ALASKAN COMMAND and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME and ALASK DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION and ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES and ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ALASKA MARINE ECOSYSTEM FORUM Alaska Marine Ecosystem Forum Memorandum of Understanding Article I. Background The marine ecosystems off Alaska’s coast support a diverse natural environment and a multiplicity of human activities. With national initiatives calling for more systematic collaboration on ocean-related matters, the establishment of the Alaska Marine Ecosystem Forum (AMEF) brings together Alaska’s Federal and State agencies as well as the North Pacific Fishery Management Council to address issues of shared responsibilities related to the marine ecosystems off Alaska’s coast. The AMEF promotes the collective aim of Federal and State agencies and the North Pacific Fishery Management Council to achieve sustainable management and use of Alaska’s marine ecosystems in the most effective and efficient manner, consistent with the missions of those agencies.
  • Analysis of Laws Governing Access Across Federal Lands: Options for Access in Alaska

    Analysis of Laws Governing Access Across Federal Lands: Options for Access in Alaska

    Analysis of Laws Governing Access Across Federal Lands: Options for Access in Alaska February 1979 NTIS order #PB-293982 Library of Congress Card Catalog Number 79-600029 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock No. 052-003-00647-2 Foreword This analysis was conducted in response to a request from the Tech- nology Assessment Board that the Office of Technology Assessment [OTA) examine the effects of Federal laws, policies, and practices on ac- cess through Federal lands to non-Federal mineral-bearing lands. The report analyzes the laws governing Federal land management systems, the laws specifically applicable to Alaskan lands, and the major environ- mental and land-planning laws that affect access across Federal land management systems. Prior to Alaska statehood, the Federal Government owned over 99 percent of the land in the State. The Alaska Statehood Act and the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act provide for conveyance of about 40 percent of the land to the State and to Native Regional and Village Corporations. Congressional intent, expressed at the time of passage of these Acts, was to provide land and resources, including minerals, to create an economic base for these non-Federal parties. Following conveyance of State and Native lands, 60 percent of Alaska will remain in Federal ownership. These Federal lands will be managed by a number of different agencies under provisions of several laws. Access is a legal right to use certain lands for a specific purpose and access across Federal to State, Native, and privately held lands is a prominent issue for several reasons.
  • Page 1480 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1113 (Pub

    Page 1480 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1113 (Pub

    § 1113 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1480 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 13, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation § 1113. Authorization of appropriations System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- There are hereby authorized to be appro- priations be available for additional personnel priated to the Department of the Interior with- stated as being required solely for the purpose of out fiscal year limitation such sums as may be managing or administering areas solely because necessary for the purposes of this chapter and they are included within the National Wilder- the agreement with the Government of Canada ness Preservation System. signed January 22, 1964, article 11 of which pro- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined vides that the Governments of the United States A wilderness, in contrast with those areas and Canada shall share equally the costs of de- where man and his own works dominate the veloping and the annual cost of operating and landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where maintaining the Roosevelt Campobello Inter- the earth and its community of life are un- national Park. trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- (Pub. L. 88–363, § 14, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness is further defined to mean in this chapter an CHAPTER 23—NATIONAL WILDERNESS area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its PRESERVATION SYSTEM primeval character and influence, without per- manent improvements or human habitation, Sec. which is protected and managed so as to pre- 1131.