DOCSLIB.ORG

Mapping and Characterising Reef Habitat and Fish Assemblages of the Hunter Marine Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mapping and Characterising Reef Habitat and Fish Assemblages of the Hunter Marine Park Mapping and characterising reef habitat and fish assemblages of the Hunter Marine Park Joel Williams, Tim Ingleton, Michael Sutherland, Peter Davies, Jacquomo Monk, Neville Barrett and Alan Jordan Project D3 – Implementing monitoring of AMPs and the status of marine biodiversity assets on the continental shelf December 2020 Milestone 10 www.nespmarine.edu.au Enquiries should be addressed to: Dr Joel Williams, NSW Department of Primary Industries, joel.williams@dpi.nsw.gov.au Dr Tim Ingleton, NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, tim.ingleton@environment.nsw.gov.au Preferred Citation Williams J, Ingleton T, Sutherland M, Davies P, Monk J, Barrett N, Jordan A (2020). Mapping and characterising reef habitat and fish assemblages of the Hunter Marine Park. Report to the National Environmental Science Program, Marine Biodiversity Hub. NSW Government. Copyright This report is licensed by the University of Tasmania for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia Licence. For licence conditions, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Acknowledgement This work was undertaken for the Marine Biodiversity Hub, a collaborative partnership supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program (NESP). NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub partners include the University of Tasmania; CSIRO, Geoscience Australia, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Museums Victoria, Charles Darwin University, the University of Western Australia, Integrated Marine Observing System, NSW Department of Planning Industry and Environment (Formally NSW Office of Environment and Heritage), NSW Department of Primary Industries. Important Disclaimer The NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub advises that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation. No reliance or actions must therefore be made on that information without seeking prior expert professional, scientific and technical advice. To the extent permitted by law, the NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub (including its host organisation, employees, partners and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Hunter Marine Park Background ............................................................................... 3 1.2 NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub D3 Project ............................................................... 5 1.3 Introduction to Mesophotic Reef ............................................................................... 5 1.4 Project Aims .............................................................................................................. 9 2. Multibeam Mapping ......................................................................................... 10 2.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 10 2.2 Methods .................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Results and Discussion ........................................................................................... 15 2.3.1 Seal Rocks (Area A) ............................................................................................ 15 2.3.2 Outer Gibber (Area B) ......................................................................................... 16 2.3.3 Offshore Broughton Island (Area C) .................................................................... 16 2.3.4 Habitat Distribution and Seabed Landforms ........................................................ 17 3. Benthic Habitat: Towed Video ........................................................................ 31 3.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 31 3.2 Methods .................................................................................................................. 32 3.3 Results and Discussion ........................................................................................... 34 3.3.1 Fieldwork and Image Acquisition ......................................................................... 34 3.3.2 Data and Preliminary Image Analysis ................................................................. 35 4. Fish Assemblages: Stereo-Baited Remote Underwater Video (stereo-BRUV)53 4.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 53 4.2 Methods .................................................................................................................. 57 4.2.1 Sampling Locations ............................................................................................. 57 4.2.2 Sampling Fish Assemblage: Baited Remote Underwater Stereo Video (Stereo-BRUV) ............................................................................................................................ 57 4.2.3 Data Analysis ...................................................................................................... 60 4.3 Results and Discussion ........................................................................................... 65 4.3.1 Number of Stereo-BRUV Deployments ............................................................... 65 4.3.2 Habitat ................................................................................................................. 68 4.3.3 Summary of Fish Assemblages ........................................................................... 75 4.3.4 Species Richness ................................................................................................ 80 4.3.5 Summary of Species of Interest .......................................................................... 82 Pink snapper, Chrysophrys auratus .................................................................... 86 Blue (grey) morwong, Nemadactylus douglasii ................................................... 90 Redfish, Centroberyx affinis ................................................................................ 93 Silver trevally, Pseudocaranx georgianus ........................................................... 96 Yellowtail scad, Trachurus novaezelandiae ........................................................ 99 Velvet leatherjacket, Meuschenia scaber .......................................................... 102 Teraglin, Atractoscion aequidens ...................................................................... 106 Pearl perch, Glaucosoma scapulare ................................................................. 109 Silver sweep, Scorpis lineolata .......................................................................... 112 Reef ocean perch, Helicolenus percoides ......................................................... 115 Sawtooth moray, Gymnothorax prionodon ........................................................ 118 Bluespotted flathead, Platycephalus caeruleopunctatus ................................... 120 Eastern Pigfish, Bodianus unimaculatus ........................................................... 123 Eastern rock lobster, Sagmariasus verreauxi .................................................... 126 4.3.6 Threatened and Protected Species ................................................................... 129 4.3.7 Other Species of Interest .................................................................................. 131 Common sawshark, Pristiophorus cirratus ........................................................ 131 Banded rockcod, Hyporthodus ergastularius..................................................... 131 4.3.8 Power Analyses for Species of Interest ............................................................. 133 5. Fish Assemblage: ROV ................................................................................. 135 6. Conclusions ................................................................................................... 139 7. Recommendations ........................................................................................ 141 Metadata and Data Storage.................................................................................... 144 Outreach ................................................................................................................. 145 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ 146 References .............................................................................................................. 147 Appendix A – Fish Species List ............................................................................ 155 Appendix B – Full Subset GAMM Partial Plots ..................................................... 159 List of Figures Figure 1-1. The extent of the Hunter Marine Park in relation to the directly adjoining Port Stephens
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes
    Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes VICTOR G. SPRINGER m SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 367 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoo/ogy Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world cf science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of Terengganu East Coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia Ii Iii
    i Fishes of Terengganu East coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia ii iii Edited by Mizuki Matsunuma, Hiroyuki Motomura, Keiichi Matsuura, Noor Azhar M. Shazili and Mohd Azmi Ambak Photographed by Masatoshi Meguro and Mizuki Matsunuma iv Copy Right © 2011 by the National Museum of Nature and Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Kagoshima University Museum All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the publisher. Copyrights of the specimen photographs are held by the Kagoshima Uni- versity Museum. For bibliographic purposes this book should be cited as follows: Matsunuma, M., H. Motomura, K. Matsuura, N. A. M. Shazili and M. A. Ambak (eds.). 2011 (Nov.). Fishes of Terengganu – east coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia. National Museum of Nature and Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Kagoshima University Museum, ix + 251 pages. ISBN 978-4-87803-036-9 Corresponding editor: Hiroyuki Motomura (e-mail: motomura@kaum.kagoshima-u.ac.jp) v Preface Tropical seas in Southeast Asian countries are well known for their rich fish diversity found in various environments such as beautiful coral reefs, mud flats, sandy beaches, mangroves, and estuaries around river mouths. The South China Sea is a major water body containing a large and diverse fish fauna. However, many areas of the South China Sea, particularly in Malaysia and Vietnam, have been poorly studied in terms of fish taxonomy and diversity. Local fish scientists and students have frequently faced difficulty when try- ing to identify fishes in their home countries. During the International Training Program of the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (ITP of JSPS), two graduate students of Kagoshima University, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Effectiveness of Surrogates for Conserving Biodiversity in the Port Stephens-Great Lakes Marine Park
    Assessing the effectiveness of surrogates for conserving biodiversity in the Port Stephens-Great Lakes Marine Park Vanessa Owen B Env Sc, B Sc (Hons) School of the Environment University of Technology Sydney Submitted in fulfilment for the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2015 Certificate of Original Authorship I certify that the work in this thesis has not been previously submitted for a degree nor has it been submitted as part of requirements for a degree except as fully acknowledged within the text. I also certify that the thesis has been written by me. Any help that I have received in my research work and preparation of the thesis itself has been acknowledged. In addition, I certify that all information sources and literature used as indicated in the thesis. Signature of Student: Date: Page ii Acknowledgements I thank my supervisor William Gladstone for invaluable support, advice, technical reviews, patience and understanding. I thank my family for their encouragement and support, particularly my mum who is a wonderful role model. I hope that my children too are inspired to dream big and work hard. This study was conducted with the support of the University of Newcastle, the University of Technology Sydney, University of Sydney, NSW Office of the Environment and Heritage (formerly Department of Environment Climate Change and Water), Marine Park Authority NSW, NSW Department of Primary Industries (Fisheries) and the Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS) program funded through the Department of Industry, Climate Change, Science, Education, Research and Tertiary Education. The sessile benthic assemblage fieldwork was led by Dr Oscar Pizarro and undertaken by the University of Sydney’s Australian Centre for Field Robotics.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Appendices
    APPENDICES APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 – PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIC PAPERS Aidoo EN, Ute Mueller U, Hyndes GA, and Ryan Braccini M. 2015. Is a global quantitative KL. 2016. The effects of measurement uncertainty assessment of shark populations warranted? on spatial characterisation of recreational fishing Fisheries, 40: 492–501. catch rates. Fisheries Research 181: 1–13. Braccini M. 2016. Experts have different Andrews KR, Williams AJ, Fernandez-Silva I, perceptions of the management and conservation Newman SJ, Copus JM, Wakefield CB, Randall JE, status of sharks. Annals of Marine Biology and and Bowen BW. 2016. Phylogeny of deepwater Research 3: 1012. snappers (Genus Etelis) reveals a cryptic species pair in the Indo-Pacific and Pleistocene invasion of Braccini M, Aires-da-Silva A, and Taylor I. 2016. the Atlantic. Molecular Phylogenetics and Incorporating movement in the modelling of shark Evolution 100: 361-371. and ray population dynamics: approaches and management implications. Reviews in Fish Biology Bellchambers LM, Gaughan D, Wise B, Jackson G, and Fisheries 26: 13–24. and Fletcher WJ. 2016. Adopting Marine Stewardship Council certification of Western Caputi N, de Lestang S, Reid C, Hesp A, and How J. Australian fisheries at a jurisdictional level: the 2015. Maximum economic yield of the western benefits and challenges. Fisheries Research 183: rock lobster fishery of Western Australia after 609-616. moving from effort to quota control. Marine Policy, 51: 452-464. Bellchambers LM, Fisher EA, Harry AV, and Travaille KL. 2016. Identifying potential risks for Charles A, Westlund L, Bartley DM, Fletcher WJ, Marine Stewardship Council assessment and Garcia S, Govan H, and Sanders J.
    [Show full text]
  • The FAD Fishery in the Gulf of Thailand
    Aquat. Living Resour. 26, 85–96 (2013) Aquatic c EDP Sciences, IFREMER, IRD 2013 DOI: 10.1051/alr/2013045 Living www.alr-journal.org Resources The FAD fishery in the Gulf of Thailand: time for management measures Pavarot Noranarttragoon1,a, Piyachok Sinanan2, Nantachai Boonjohn3, Pakjuta Khemakorn4 and Amararatne Yakupitiyage1 1 Asian Institute of Technology, PO Box 4, Klong Luang, 12120 Pathum Thani, Thailand 2 Eastern Marine Fisheries Research and Development Center (Rayong), 2 Phe, Muang, 21160 Rayong, Thailand 3 Chumphon Marine Fisheries Research and Development Center, 408 Paknam, Muang, 86120 Chumphon, Thailand 4 Southern Marine Fisheries Research and Development Center (Songkhla), 79/1 Wichianchom Rd., Bo-yang, Muang, 90000 Songkhla, Thailand Received 3 May 2012; Accepted 9 January 2013 Abstract – Fish aggregating devices (FADs) used in the Gulf of Thailand are made of bamboo poles, twisted wire and coconut leaves, fastened to a concrete block. Purse seines with 2.5 cm mesh size are used to surround the fish, using fishing boats ranging from 18 to 26 m in overall length. Fishing grounds are located in the central Gulf of Thailand at a depth of 25–60 m. Catch per unit effort (CPUE), species composition and size of economically important species were analyzed by collecting data from fishing boats using FADs at nine main fishing ports along the Gulf of Thailand between January and December 2007. The results show that the average CPUE was 3351 kg day−1,which was composed of 88% pelagic fishes, 5% demersal fishes, 4% trash fishes and 2% squids and cuttlefishes. The major pelagic species were Indian mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagurta), Indian scad (Decapterus russelli) and bigeye scad (Selar crumenophthalmus), which made up 25%, 24% and 8% of the total catch, respectively, while neritic tunas (kawakawa; Euthynnus affinis, frigate tuna; Auxis thazard thazard and longtail tuna; Thunnus tonggol) made up 8% of the total catch.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 1.0MB .Pdf File
    Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 57( I): 143-165 ( 1998) 1 May 1998 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1998.57.08 FISHES OF WILSONS PROMONTORY AND CORNER INLET, VICTORIA: COMPOSITION AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC AFFINITIES M. L. TURNER' AND M. D. NORMAN2 'Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, PO Box 1379,Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia (m.tumer@gbrmpa.gov.au) 1Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia (corresponding author: m.norman@zoology.unimelb.edu.au) Abstract Turner, M.L. and Norman, M.D., 1998. Fishes of Wilsons Promontory and Comer Inlet. Victoria: composition and biogeographic affinities. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 57: 143-165. A diving survey of shallow-water marine fishes, primarily benthic reef fishes, was under­ taken around Wilsons Promontory and in Comer Inlet in 1987 and 1988. Shallow subtidal reefs in these regions are dominated by labrids, particularly Bluethroat Wrasse (Notolabrus tet­ ricus) and Saddled Wrasse (Notolabrus fucicola), the odacid Herring Cale (Odax cyanomelas), the serranid Barber Perch (Caesioperca rasor) and two scorpidid species, Sea Sweep (Scorpis aequipinnis) and Silver Sweep (Scorpis lineolata). Distributions and relative abundances (qualitative) are presented for 76 species at 26 sites in the region. The findings of this survey were supplemented with data from other surveys and sources to generate a checklist for fishes in the coastal waters of Wilsons Promontory and Comer Inlet. 23 I fishspecies of 92 families were identified to species level. An additional four species were only identified to higher taxonomic levels. These fishes were recorded from a range of habitat types, from freshwater streams to marine habitats (to 50 m deep).
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Resources from Thai Purse Seine in the Inner Gulf of Thailand
    2 Fisheries Resources from Thai Purse Seine in the Inner Gulf of Thailand Pavarot Noranarttragoon1*, Thitipon Chueamunkong2 and Adisorn Jamsai3 1 Fisheries Resources Assessment Group 2 Upper Gulf Fisheries Research and Development Center (Samut Prakan) 3 Mueang Surin Fisheries District Office Abstract Catch per unit effort (CPUE), species composition and size of some economically important species from Thai purse seiners in the Inner Gulf of Thailand were studied during January to December 2013 by collecting the data from fishing port in Chon Buri, Samut Prakan, Samut Sakhon, Phetchaburi and Prachuap Khiri Khan Province. The results showed that CPUE was 2,114.007 kilogram/day. Pelagic fish represented the highest composition of 84.39% of the total catch followed by trash fish, demersal fish and invertebrate made up 11.39%, 3.04% and 1.18% of the total catch respectively. The major pelagic species were short mackerel (Rastrelliger brachysoma), goldstripe sardinella (Sardinella gibbosa) and white sardinella (S. albella) sum up 51.62%, 13.66% and 3.83% of the total catch respectively. The size measurement of ten economically important pelagic species found that mean length of five species, i.e., short mackerel, goldstripe sardinella, yellowtail scad (Atule mate), Indian mackerel (R. kanagurta) and torpedo scad (Megalaspis cordyla), were smaller than their size at first maturity accounted for 94.74%, 72.82%, 96.79%, 76.14% and 99.26% of their total catch respectively. In addition, mean length of yellowstripe scad (Selaroides leptolepis) was larger than its size at first maturity. Keywords: fisheries resources, Thai purse seine, Inner Gulf of Thailand, pelagic fish, short mackerel *Corresponding author: Department of Fisheries, 50 Phahon Yothin Road, Lad Yao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900 Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Protozoan Parasites Recorded in Australia Peter J. O
    1 CATALOGUE OF PROTOZOAN PARASITES RECORDED IN AUSTRALIA PETER J. O’DONOGHUE & ROBERT D. ADLARD O’Donoghue, P.J. & Adlard, R.D. 2000 02 29: Catalogue of protozoan parasites recorded in Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 45(1):1-164. Brisbane. ISSN 0079-8835. Published reports of protozoan species from Australian animals have been compiled into a host- parasite checklist, a parasite-host checklist and a cross-referenced bibliography. Protozoa listed include parasites, commensals and symbionts but free-living species have been excluded. Over 590 protozoan species are listed including amoebae, flagellates, ciliates and ‘sporozoa’ (the latter comprising apicomplexans, microsporans, myxozoans, haplosporidians and paramyxeans). Organisms are recorded in association with some 520 hosts including mammals, marsupials, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish and invertebrates. Information has been abstracted from over 1,270 scientific publications predating 1999 and all records include taxonomic authorities, synonyms, common names, sites of infection within hosts and geographic locations. Protozoa, parasite checklist, host checklist, bibliography, Australia. Peter J. O’Donoghue, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia; Robert D. Adlard, Protozoa Section, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia; 31 January 2000. CONTENTS the literature for reports relevant to contemporary studies. Such problems could be avoided if all previous HOST-PARASITE CHECKLIST 5 records were consolidated into a single database. Most Mammals 5 researchers currently avail themselves of various Reptiles 21 electronic database and abstracting services but none Amphibians 26 include literature published earlier than 1985 and not all Birds 34 journal titles are covered in their databases. Fish 44 Invertebrates 54 Several catalogues of parasites in Australian PARASITE-HOST CHECKLIST 63 hosts have previously been published.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Manual Series No.15/2018
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CMFRI Digital Repository DBTR-H D Indian Council of Agricultural Research Ministry of Science and Technology Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Department of Biotechnology CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual This is a limited edition of the CMFRI Training Manual provided to participants of the “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals” organized by the Marine Biotechnology Division of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), from 2nd February 2015 - 31st March 2018. Principal Investigator Dr. P. Vijayagopal Compiled & Edited by Dr. P. Vijayagopal Dr. Reynold Peter Assisted by Aditya Prabhakar Swetha Dhamodharan P V ISBN 978-93-82263-24-1 CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Published by Dr A Gopalakrishnan Director, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR-CMFRI) Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute PB.No:1603, Ernakulam North P.O, Kochi-682018, India. 2 Foreword Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), Kochi along with CIFE, Mumbai and CIFA, Bhubaneswar within the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and Department of Biotechnology of Government of India organized a series of training programs entitled “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals”.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet of the Australian Sea Lion (Neophoca Cinerea): an Assessment of Novel DNA-Based and Contemporary Methods to Determine Prey Consumption
    Diet of the Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea): an assessment of novel DNA-based and contemporary methods to determine prey consumption Kristian John Peters BSc (hons), LaTrobe University, Victoria Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Adelaide (October, 2016) 2 DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY I certify that this work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in my name, in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. In addition, I certify that no part of this work will, in the future, be used in a submission in my name, for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of the University of Adelaide and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint-award of this degree. I give consent to this copy of my thesis when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I acknowledge that copyright of published works contained within this thesis resides with the copyright holder(s) of those works. I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University’s digital research repository, the Library Search and also through web search engines, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Distributions of Coastal Zooplanktivorous Fishes
    Dynamic distributions of coastal zooplanktivorous fishes Matthew Michael Holland A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Science University of New South Wales, Australia November 2020 4/20/2021 GRIS Welcome to the Research Alumni Portal, Matthew Holland! You will be able to download the finalised version of all thesis submissions that were processed in GRIS here. Please ensure to include the completed declaration (from the Declarations tab), your completed Inclusion of Publications Statement (from the Inclusion of Publications Statement tab) in the final version of your thesis that you submit to the Library. Information on how to submit the final copies of your thesis to the Library is available in the completion email sent to you by the GRS. Thesis submission for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Thesis Title and Abstract Declarations Inclusion of Publications Statement Corrected Thesis and Responses Thesis Title Dynamic distributions of coastal zooplanktivorous fishes Thesis Abstract Zooplanktivorous fishes are an essential trophic link transferring planktonic production to coastal ecosystems. Reef-associated or pelagic, their fast growth and high abundance are also crucial to supporting fisheries. I examined environmental drivers of their distribution across three levels of scale. Analysis of a decade of citizen science data off eastern Australia revealed that the proportion of community biomass for zooplanktivorous fishes peaked around the transition from sub-tropical to temperate latitudes, while the proportion of herbivores declined. This transition was attributed to high sub-tropical benthic productivity and low temperate planktonic productivity in winter.
    [Show full text]