DOCSLIB.ORG

Southern Nevada Water Authority

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southern Nevada Water Authority Southern Nevada Water Authority Legislative Committee to Study the Use, Management and Allocation of Water Resources January 13, 2006 EXHIBIT B – WATER RESOURCES Meeting Date: 01-13-06 Document consists of 36 slides. Entire Exhibit Provided What is SNWA? The Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) was formed in 1991 to address Southern Nevada’s unique water needs on a regional basis SNWA Member Agencies City of Las Vegas City of Henderson City of Boulder City City of North Las Vegas Big Bend Water District Clark County Water Reclamation District Las Vegas Valley Water District SNWA Resource Portfolio − Southern Nevada has historically benefited from two very dependable, accessible and inexpensive resource options: − Groundwater in the Las Vegas Valley − Colorado River Water Historic Water Use SNWA Resources Today, the Colorado River meets 90% of Southern Nevada’s resource needs Year Colorado River Non-Colorado River 1940 0% 100% 1975 50% 50% 2005 90% 10% SNWA Resources By 2050, the Colorado River is expected to meet 60% of Southern Nevada’s resource needs Year Colorado River Non-Colorado River 1940 0% 100% 1975 50% 50% 2005 90% 10% 2050 60% 40% Integrated Water Planning Advisory Committee Created in June 2004 Presented Recommendations in November 2005 Purpose To assess alternatives and develop general recommendations for the SNWA Board of Directors concerning integration of in-state water resources into the water planning and management activities of Southern Nevada. Stakeholder Groups SNWA Board Appointments Other Participants Nevada Taxpayers Association (1) Lincoln County Resident (1) Gaming Industry (1) White Pine County Resident (1) Homebuilder (1) Nye County Resident (1) Master Planner (1) Moapa Valley Water District (1) Developer (1) Virgin Valley Water District (1) Industrial/Commercial Business (1) Small Business (2) Ex Officio Members Paiute Tribe (1) Chair, Colorado River Commission Financial Industry (1) Chair, Committee on Public Lands Union (2) Office of the Governor (1) Environmental (2) Senior Citizens (2) Southern Nevada Residents (5) Committee Members Dean Baker Frank Martin Richard Bunker Adrian Mendoza Earl Burris Alfreda Mitre Bob Campbell Terry Murphy Brent Hardy Bob Nard Glen Hardy Bryan Nix John Hiatt Ken Rengert Michael Hillerby Dean Rhoads Somer Hollingsworth John Ritter Peggy Maze Johnson Mark Russell Allen Kaercher Dan Stewart Walt Kuver Danny Thompson Joel Laub Jim Widner Clifton Marshall Glenn Zelch Bill Martin Key IWPAC Recommendations • Pursue more aggressive water conservation • Decrease total water demand from 272 GPCD to 250 GPCD by 2010 and to 245 GPCD by 2035 • Pursue development of all the resource options considered in the IWPAC planning scenarios • Provide additional safeguards for communities and the environment in areas where in-state groundwater resources are developed • Continue to pursue ocean desalination as a long- term resource Water Conservation SNWA has one of the most aggressive water conservation programs in the Nation Demand Reduction Tools • Development codes (commercial & residential) – Indoor fixtures (for example, low flow devices) – Outdoor landscaping, misting systems and fountains • Time-of-day and day-of-week watering restrictions • Water budgets for golf courses • Water efficiency plans for resorts Water Waste Investigations Over the past two years, we conducted over 77,000 water waste investigations $/1,000 gallons Tiered PricingEncourages Conservation $0.00 $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 1 5 9 13 17 Monthly Use 1000's Gals 21 25 29 33 37 41 2002-2003 Rate 2003-2004 Rate 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 Water Smart Landscapes Program • Instituted in 1999 • Provides rebates to customers that replace turf with water-smart landscaping • Nearly 68 million square-feet converted since program inception • Over 3.7 billion gallons saved annually Water Smart Landscapes Program Since 1999, the equivalent of 1,177 football fields of decorative turf have been converted Before Conversion After Conversion Water Smart Landscapes Program Since the program’s inception, the Southern Nevada Water Authority has rebated nearly $56 million Water Conservation & Drought Response Southern Nevada has made significant conservation gains 325,000 270,000 265,000 2002 2003 2004 Between 2002 and 2004, Southern Nevada’s consumptive water use decreased by about 20 billion gallons, despite nearly 170,000 new residents and 37 million annual visitors. Acre-feet 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 0 2002-2005 Cumulative WaterUse Jan 2005 2004 2003 2002 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec The Bottom Line Conservation will continue to play a significant role in water management activities for Southern Nevada SNWA Water Resource Portfolio Colorado River Resources Non-Colorado River Resources − Nevada Basic Apportionment − LV Valley Groundwater − Return Flow Credits − LV Valley Shallow Aquifer − Surpluses/Interim Surplus − LV Valley Reclaimed Groundwater − Unused Apportionment (AZ/NV) − In-State Non-Colorado River Water − Arizona Water Bank − Muddy River − California Water Bank − Virgin River − Southern Nevada Water Bank − Groundwater in Clark, Lincoln & − Transfers/Exchanges White Pine counties − Reclaimed In-State Resources Projected Demands and Current Resources 1,200,000 Projected Demands 1,000,000 800,000 Unused Nevada (Non-SNWA) Reclaimed Water Colorado River Water 600,000 acre-feet/year 400,000 Colorado River Water Return Flow Credits 200,000 Colorado River Water Consumptive Use 0 Groundwater 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 2030 2034 2038 2042 2046 2050 2054 2006 Water Resource Plan 1,200,000 Bank Recovery (CA and NV) Transfers and Exchanges 1,000,000 Full Consumptive Use / Recycled In-State 800,000 In-State Resources 600,000 AZ Recovery acre-feet/year 400,000 Current Resources 200,000 0 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 2030 2034 2038 2042 2046 2050 2054 Sample Planning Scenario + 8,000 plus Augmentation 1,000,000 Resource Option Yield (AFY) Arizona Water Bank 68,000 800,000 Three Lakes Valley GW 8,000 Coyote Spring Valley GW 9,000 Pre-Compact Rights 20,000 600,000 Virgin – Surface Diversion 60,000 5 Basin Approach N/A 400,000 6 Basin Approach 125,000 Augmentation Credits (partial*) 113,000 200,000 Additional Conservation Varies Total 403,000 0 Year 2035 * Augmentation credits not applied to Virgin River surface diversion (1994 water rights) In-State Resources Clark, Lincoln, and White Pine counties groundwater development Virgin/Muddy rivers surface water Three Lakes Valley development groundwater development Three Lakes Project Overview • Approximately 8,900 acre-feet of groundwater rights in Three Lakes North, Three Lakes South and Tikaboo South valleys • Delivery via pipeline to northwest portion of the Las Vegas Valley Virgin/Muddy River Surface Water Project Overview • 113,000 acre-feet of Virgin River water rights (annual average diversion) • ~ 7,000 acre-feet of Muddy River water rights • Delivery via Lake Mead, pipeline to northern portion of the Las Vegas Valley or combination of the two Clark, Lincoln & White Pine Groundwater Project Overview • Contingent upon permits for unused groundwater from six basins; water right applications were filed in 1989 • EIS analysis is based on180,000 afy of groundwater • Approximately 420 miles of pipeline with 4 pumping stations • Delivery to northeast Las Vegas • ~ 200 miles of power line • Disinfection treatment only – no arsenic treatment anticipated because of blending Interbasin Transfers • Interbasin water transfers are not new in Nevada – The first one was in Northern Nevada in 1873 Existing Transfers Proposed Transfers Carson City Clark County Wendover Washoe County Tonopah Lyon County Lovelock Virginia City Truckee-Carson Irrigation District Eureka Truckee River Lincoln County Land Bill • Signed into law – December 2004 • Designates utility corridors • Designates wilderness areas and disposes of some federal lands within Lincoln County • Requires environmental compliance • Land sales help fund education statewide and economic development within Lincoln County • Authorizes White Pine County water study White Pine County Water Study • Review groundwater quantity, quality and flow characteristics of basins within White Pine County, in White Pine or Lincoln County, and in adjacent areas in Utah • Appropriates $6 million • Designates U.S. Geological Survey, Desert Research Institute and a representative from the State of Utah to conduct the study •The Basin and Range Carbonate Aquifer System Study (BARCASS) was initiated for this purpose White Pine County Meeting • Attended 1/11 White Pine Board of County Commissioners meeting • Offered to settle differences with the county • Suggested development of a plan to reserve water in Spring Valley for future development • Discussed pre-payment of interbasin transfer fee Pre-Hearing Conference • State Engineer held a pre-hearing conference on 1/5 • Heard from applicant and protestants on various hearing issues, such as: – Timetable and schedule – Hearing format – Pre-hearing information sharing • State Engineer expected to issue an interim order specifying hearing details .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geophysical Constraints on the Virgin River Depression, Nevada, Utah, and Arizona by V.E
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geophysical Constraints on the Virgin River Depression, Nevada, Utah, and Arizona by V.E. Langenheim1 , J.M. Glen1 , R.C. Jachens1 , G.L. Dixon2 , T.C. Katzer3 , and R.L. Morin1 Open-File Report 00-407 2000 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1Menlo Park, California 2Las Vegas, Nevada 3Cordilleran Hydrology, Inc., Reno, Nevada TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract.................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................. 1 Geologic Setting....................................................................................................... 1 Previous Geophysical Work .................................................................................... 2 Drill-Hole Data and Physical Properties .................................................................. 3 Gravity and Magnetic Data....................................................................................... 4 Depth to Basement................................................................................................... 7 Method.................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water - Surface Water Interactions in the Lower Virgin River Area, Arizona and Nevada
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1995 Ground water - surface water interactions in the lower Virgin River area, Arizona and Nevada Lynn Metcalf University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Metcalf, Lynn, "Ground water - surface water interactions in the lower Virgin River area, Arizona and Nevada" (1995). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 502. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/z90f-mtsv This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • VVHS 100 Year History.Pdf
    A HISTO Y OF EDUCATION IN THE VIRGIN VALLEY TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Page 1 Chapter First schools to 1890 Page 3 Chapter 2 1890 to 1905 Page 8 Chapter 3 1905 to 1920 Page 12 Chapter 4 1920 to 1930 Page 17 Chapter 5 1930 to 1940 Page 21 Chapter 6 1940 to 1950 Page 28 Chapter 7 1950 to 1970 Page 40 Chapter 8 1970 to Present Page 46 Credits Page 57 Introduction This book was undertaken as a English IV Distinguished Scholar research project. It endeavors to cover the history of education from the first settlement in 1877 in Bunkerv ll 1 e to the present day. Th 1 s year was chosen for the project to mark the last year the students of the Virgin Valley High School would spend on the present campus and to commemorate the move to the new facility. Many people in the Virgin Valley have contributed information and spent hours helping the seniors research this book. Throughout the text, the memor l es and research of Vinnie Leavitt and DeMar Hughes are used as the basis for the history. Others who have contributed are E. Wesley Hughes, Marion ~Tex~ Hughes, Gertha Norvell, Myrtle Reber, Rene Adams, Emmett Barnum, Don Lee, Jack and Vi.late Hardy, Larry and Colleen Reber, Mike Waite, Evan Wilson, Kirk Brotherson, Joe Bowler, Kent Anderson and Harold Wittwer. For their help and encouragement, we are extremely grateful. A bibliography of the articles and histories which were used in each chapter are listed at the end. As the research was gathered, there were discrepencies 1 n some of the art i c I es.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Deliveries of Colorado River Basin Water
    Municipal Deliveries of Colorado River Basin Water Author Michael J. Cohen Research Assistant Jenifer C. Martin Editors Nancy Ross Paula Luu Pacific Institute 654 13th Street, Preservation Park Oakland, California 94612 www.pacinst.org Phone: 510.251.1600 Facsimile: 510.251.2203 © Copyright 2011. All Rights Reserved ISBN: 1-893790-34-7 ISBN 13: 978-1-893790-34-6 Cover Photo: Aerial view of the Whitsett Pumping Plant, Courtesy © The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Note – this 8/21/2011 revision corrects: population data for the City of Westminster, water delivery data for Denver Water, GPCD calculations for Grand Valley, CO (Grand Junction), and 2005 Colorado River deliveries for San Luís Río Colorado, Mexico. Municipal Deliveries of Colorado River Basin Water About the Pacific Institute The Pacific Institute is one of the world’s leading independent nonprofits conducting research and education to create a healthier planet and sustainable communities. Based in Oakland, California, with an office in Boulder, Colorado, we conduct interdisciplinary research and partner with stakeholders to produce solutions that advance environmental protection, economic development, and social equity—in California, nationally, and internationally. We work to change policy and find real-world solutions to problems like water shortages, habitat destruction, global warming, and environmental injustice. Since our founding in 1987, the Pacific Institute has become a locus for independent, innovative thinking that cuts across traditional areas of study, helping us make connections and bring opposing groups together. The result is effective, actionable solutions addressing issues in the fields of freshwater resources, climate change, environmental justice, and globalization. More information about the Institute and our staff, directors, funders, and programs can be found at www.pacinst.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Virgin Valley Water District
    Virgin Valley Water District • About the District • Where Our Water Comes From • About the System About the District - History • 1800’s water was pulled directly from the Virgin River, mixed with ashes, settled in cisterns and used for water • First well drilled in 1930 • 1933 - first town piping installed near Bunkerville school that also served 10 homes • Mid 1930’s springs on Virgin Mountain developed and piped to both Bunkerville and Mesquite Cabin Canyon Spring About the District - History Bunkerville Park Well (Well 29 Site) • 1940’s Bunkerville Water User’s and Mesquite Farmstead Water Associations were created and started supplying water • Virgin Valley Water District Created in 1993 by State Legislature – Combined assets of the two water companies • Hyper growth in late 90’s to 2008 • Arsenic treatment plants installed in 2009 • Current operations Groundwater Basin 222 Shared between Nevada, Utah, and Arizona Groundwater Basin 222 – Where VVWD Gets it’s Groundwater From Colorado River Water Basin The Colorado River Water Shed Virgin River Water Basin The Virgin River Arm of the Colorado River Watershed About the System VVWD Service Boundary and Springs Location About the System Major Transmission Lines: -Black 24” -Burnt Orange 18” -Yellow 16” -Purple 14” -Blue 12” About the System System Pressure Zone and Well Feeding Map Consultants, Vendors & Contractors The Cost of Providing Water to the Public What the Public Expects: Maintenance and Repair: Things Eventually Wear Out Pipe, Booster Pumps, Meter Vaults, Wells, Valves, Hydrants,
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology and Ground-Water Conditions of the Tertiary Muddy Creek Formation in the Lower Virgin River Basin of Southeastern Neva
    HYDROLOGY AND GROUND-WATER CONDITIONS OF THE TERTIARY MUDDY CREEK FORMATION IN THE LOWER VIRGIN RIVER BASIN OF SOUTHEASTERN NEVADA AND ADJACENT ARIZONA AND UTAH Geological Society of America 2002 Rocky Mountain Section Annual Meeting Cedar City, Utah May 10, 2002 FIELD TRIP LEADERS By Michael Johnson, Virgin Valley Water District, Mesquite, NV 89027 500 Riverside Road (702) 346-5731 Gary L. Dixon, Southwest Geology, Inc., Blackfoot, ID 83221 Peter D. Rowley, Geologic Mapping, Inc., New Harmony, UT 84757 Terry C. Katzer, Cordilleran Hydrology, Inc., Reno, NV 89511 Michael Winters, Virgin Valley Water District, Mesquite, Nevada 89027 284 HYDROLOGY AND GROUND-WATER CONDITIONS OF THE TERTIARY MUDDY CREEK FORMATION IN THE LOWER VIRGIN RIVER BASIN OF SOUTHEASTERN NEVADA AND ADJACENT ARIZONA AND UTAH Geological Society of America 2002 Rocky Mountain Section Annual Meeting Cedar City, Utah May 10, 2002 FIELD TRIP LEADERS By Michael Johnson, Virgin Valley Water District, Mesquite, NV 89027 Gary L. Dixon, Southwest Geology, Inc., Blackfoot, ID 83221 Peter D. Rowley, Geologic Mapping, Inc., New Harmony, UT 84757 Terry C. Katzer, Cordilleran Hydrology, Inc., Reno, NV 89511 Michael Winters, Virgin Valley Water District, Mesquite, NV 89027 ABSTRACT The lower Virgin River Basin is a complex structural basin formed by Neogene extension in Nevada, Arizona, and Utah. There is a large volume of ground water in transient storage moving through the basin. Ongoing investigations to characterize the basin have determined that it is one of the deepest in the Basin and Range Province. The estimated depth to basement underlying the carbonate rock may be as great as 5 miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical Unit of Menlo Park, Calif
    In Cooperation with the National Park Service Geophysical studies based on gravity and seismic data of Tule Desert, Meadow Valley Wash, and California Wash basins, southern Nevada By Daniel S. Scheirer, William R. Page, and John J. Miller Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Open-File Report 2006-1396 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Abstract .........................................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction and Geologic Setting.................................................................................................................................1 Gravity Observations.....................................................................................................................................................3 Gravity Analysis............................................................................................................................................................4 Rock Samples ................................................................................................................................................................6 Seismic Reflection Lines ...............................................................................................................................................6 Results ...........................................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Laub Joins Board, Loose Ends Wrapped Up
    SPECIAL SECTION Graduation 2018 congratulations MESQUITE SpECIAL Class SECTION of 2018 MESQUITE LOCAL NEWS LOCAL NEWSVol. 14, No. 32 MESQUITE, NEVADA THE WEEK OF MAY 24, 2018 VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Laub joins board, loose ends wrapped up By Linda Faas irrigation water shares. MLN The board voted unanimously 5-0 to accept a settlement agreement entered into with Las Vegas In one of its shorter meetings of the year, the Metro Police Department and Jordan Coache. The Virgin Valley Water District installed a new board settlement concerned property that was part of a member, approved its final budget for FY2019, and forfeiture assessed when Jordan’s father, Robert authorized two agreements on issues that have been Coache, was convicted of wrongdoing in a fraud pending before the board for several years. scheme involving VVWD water shares. Jordan, Randy Laub took his oath of office as newly ap- who was not part of the criminal activities, sought pointed board member, filling the seat vacated to settle the forfeiture of a Las Vegas house by pay- when Barbara Ellestad resigned April 3. Her res- ing $291,000 to Metro, which would then pay off ignation left a board vacancy for the remainder of VVWD’s claim against the property. her elected term that runs through Dec. 31. The re- Finalizing a proposed amendment to the lease of maining board members selected Laub from among irrigation water shares between VVWD and Cones- four individuals who applied for the opening. He toga Golf Course, the board voted unanimously 5-0 can serve only through the end of Ellestad’s va- to allow a minor language adjustment requested by cated term because the opening occurred after the Conestoga, while setting a deadline of Friday, May close of the candidate filing period for the upcoming 25, for receipt of their signature to the agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Trace Element Analysis of Selected Springs in the Virgin River Basin
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 5-1996 Trace element analysis of selected springs in the Virgin River Basin Mary A. Yelken University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Fresh Water Studies Commons, Geology Commons, and the Hydrology Commons Repository Citation Yelken, Mary A., "Trace element analysis of selected springs in the Virgin River Basin" (1996). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1458. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/3445028 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TRACE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF SELECTED SPRINGS IN THE VIRGIN RIVER BASIN by Mary A Yelken A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Water Resoorces Management Department of Geoscience University ofNevada, Las Vegas May 1996 1l1c thesis of Mary A. Yelken for the degree of Master of Science in Water Resources Management is approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Usda Salinity Control Environmentalassessment
    • USDA SALINITY CONTROL AND ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENT VI RGIN VALLEY SUBEVALUATION UNIT Of The Vi rgi n Ri ver Uni t Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program Prepared by Soil Conservati on Servi ce P. O. Box 4850 Reno, Nevada 89505 Telephone Area Code (702) 784-5304 Assist~d by U.S •. Sai'i ni ty Laboratory • Science and Education Administration -Agricultural Researr:h Riverside, California of the Uni ted States Departrrent of Agri culture Prepared under Title II of the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act, Public Law 93-320 April 1981 CONTENTS Page FOREWORD. • . • . • . • . • . • • . • . • . • . • • . i SUMMARY ..••..•.•.......•.......•.•.••..•.•...•.. I;) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• ; ii INTRODUCTION. .. ... .• .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 Authority for Investigation......................................... 1 Object; ve and Scope. ~;.. 2 Public Involvement PrOcess................ 4 SETTING .... 7 Location .. 7 Natural Environmental Characteristics. 10 Physiography and Geology .. 10 Cl imate •••••••• 14 Water Resource .. 14 Surface Water .. 15 Ground Water. 16 Water Use .... 16 Water Budget. 16 Water Quality. 18 Sa It Budget ... 18 Irrigation Systems and Practices. 23 Littlefield .. 23 Mes"quite .... ... 28 Bunkervi 11 e. 29 Rivrrside ... .". 30 Irrigation Methods in Virgin Valley. .'.:... 31 ·Land ·Resource " '.' . ... -31 Soil Survey and Land Classification .. 31 Erosion and Sediment ... 35 Biotic Resources. 36 Fisheries. 36 Wildlife ... 37 Vegetation .. 37 Recreation Resources. 38 Social and Economic Characteristics. 39 Popul at; on ~ . 39 Cultural, Social arid Economic Factors .. 39 Emp 1oyment .........•...... 40 Historic and Archeologic .. 41 PROBLE~lS AND NEEDS ....•........................... 42 Problems and Needs Associated With Salt Loading .. 42 Sources of Salts .. i 43 Amounts of Salts ... 49 Control Potential 49 On farm . 49 Off-Farm . 51 Problems and Needs Associated with Erosion and Sedimentation. 52 Treatment Opportunities for Erosion Problems ...
    [Show full text]
  • Water Master Plan
    Water Master Plan March 2017 Prepared by: Prepared for: WATER MASTER PLAN March 2017 Prepared for: Prepared by: WATER MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1-1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1-1 Scope of Services ......................................................................................................................... 1-1 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... 1-2 Project Staff ................................................................................................................................. 1-2 CHAPTER 2 – EXISTING SYSTEM FEATURES ................................................................ 2-1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 2-1 Service Area ................................................................................................................................. 2-1 Existing System Components ...................................................................................................... 2-1 Supply Sources............................................................................................................................. 2-1 Well No. 1A ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 'Hire a Bulldog' at Virgin Valley High
    sports Flag football recap MESQUITE Page 1B real estate Featured listing LOCAL NEWS Page 7B THE WEEK OF MARCH 3, 2016 NPA 2015 GENERAL EXCELENCE AWARD Vol. 12, No. 23 TOUrIsM eMPLOYMeNt Visitor count breaks milestone in January By Barbara Ellestad MLN Editor January 2008 was the last time Mesquite broke into six-figure numbers in its visitor count when it had a thousand more hotel Business in- rooms than it does now. That mile- structor Trent stone was broken this January Graves with when 105,070 people visited Mes- students in the quite up 7.1 percent from last year’s “Hire a Bull- 98,123 count. dog” program. Every category of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Author- Burton Weast ity January report for Mesquite showed positive growth including gross gaming revenue which in- creased 1.8 percent to $10.653 mil- lion compared to a year ago. ‘Hire A Bulldog’ at Virgin Valley High Total occupancy of 1,712 ho- tel rooms rose 1.7 percent to 72.1 By Burton Weast The classes also host local businesses to provide stu- percent from January 2015. Total MLN dents with first hand knowledge of what Mesquite em- room nights occupied increased ployers are looking for. Some of the companies that have one percent to 38,265 from last Mesquite is unique among most cities in Nevada in that participated in the classes include Virgin Valley Den- year’s 37,886 count. Much of that there are more jobs available than qualified workers. In tal, Premier Properties, Pizza Hut, Primex Plastics and came from the Mesquite Motor the next year, Mesquite Regional Business anticipates Smith’s.
    [Show full text]