DOCSLIB.ORG

2925 Forbes Flyer JUL04

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2925 Forbes Flyer JUL04 ForbesForbes FlyerFlyer THE NEWSLETTER OF THE FRANCIS FORBES SOCIETY FOR AUSTRALIAN LEGAL HISTORY ISSUE 5 JULY 2004 History reports itself The way that a profession sees itself The Jurist was conceived as a pre- Incidentally, while on the topic of is very often reflected in its industry federation publication. Purves, who largely forgotten legal works of the publications. It is interesting, then, originally had so much to do with nineteenth century, this edition of that the Australian legal profession putting the magazine together, was the Flyer highlights Tim Castle's and has such a limited history of a well-known and active Victorian Professor Bruce Kercher's work on the publications of that kind. University barrister, and ardent federalist. He had pending publication of the "Select law journals and academic papers a penchant for the vigorous promotion Cases" manuscripts of New South aside, it is only recently that the of a cause, which made him a famed Wales' second Chief Justice of the Australian legal profession has had cross examiner and KC in a time when Supreme Court, Sir James Dowling. access to truly national industry these things were a good deal more Their article does not only make for magazines with a focus on the business theatrical. The polemics that marked interesting reading, but it also gives of being a practising lawyer. The last the early editions of the jurist were a taste of things to come when they few years have seen the distribution brought about by an intense interest present the next annual Forbes Society of Lawyers Weekly and, more recently, in the nationalisation of the country, lecture on the topic "Bringing the Australian Legal Business, which fill which was desired by the editors Supreme Court to Order, 1828-1844." this seeming gap in the market. because of the benefits that they saw in The lecture will take place on Thursday the nationalisation of the legal market. These recent introductions are not 14 October 2004 at 5.30pm in the New completely without precedent. One After the Jurist disappeared there is South Wales Bar Association Common such 'industry' rag was published for very little which resembles it until the Room, and will be chaired by Andrew lawyers in 1870. It was titled The 1980s, when state law societies began Tink, the New South Wales Shadow Australian Jurist and Notes of Cases to mass-produce magazines for their Attorney General. and its initial editors were James Purves members. However, it is the As always, and until next time, we and W.M. McKinley, both of Melbourne commercial publications that we are welcome your comments, letters and town in Victoria. The magazine aimed seeing now that most closely resemble suggestions. for a national audience of lawyers and their 1870s counterpart in that they focussed on political and practice issues are distributed Australia-wide. My (with a few juicy case notes thrown in proposed explanation is that once Catherine Douglas for good measure). The Jurist's run again there is a genuine interest in the lasted from 1870 to 1873. It was benefits of a national legal market and Editor abandoned by Purves and McKinley national profession (which has risen, after two years, and then edited by one might say, because economics and English barrister Peter Stevenson Davis technology have combined to see some of Lincoln's Inn, at which point it lost of the larger firms spread across state much of its local Australian flavour. boundaries, resulting in a few national and federated corporate law firms now What is of fascination in reading on the scene). It is peculiar to think, through early editions of the Jurist that it has taken over 120 years for our is the striking similarity between the profession to progress to a point where sorts of issues explored by it and the we've caught up with the 1870s (or at new breed of industry magazines least Purves' dream at the time). But enjoying some popularity at the as Purves himself wrote in the April moment. I suppose it is in the nature 1871 edition of the Jurist "the of lawyers and historians to look for proverbial apathy of lawyers to all a causative explanation wherever one subjects affecting them as a class, can be found, so here's my theory. should on this occasion be cast aside" and perhaps it finally has. THE NEWSLETTER OF THE FRANCIS FORBES SOCIETY FOR AUSTRALIAN LEGAL HISTORY ISSUE 5 JULY 2004 Recognising the Contribution of Sir James Dowling: Chief Justice of New South Wales 1837-1844 By Tim Castle and Bruce Kercher Sir James Dowling, second Chief Justice practiced for approximately twelve years received a specific briefing from the of New South Wales, has been a largely until his appointment, at age 39, as the Colonial Office to avoid disharmony forgotten figure of Australian history. third puisne judge to the Supreme Court between the Court and the Governor. One hundred and sixty years ago, of New South Wales. Despite his initial impressions, it is clear Dowling died in office at the age of 57, that Dowling quickly established an having been a judge of the Supreme It was Dowling's skills as a court reporter, excellent rapport with both Forbes and Court for sixteen years, including seven rather than as an advocate, that brought Stephen, and he largely maintained a years as Chief Justice. This year, the him to the attention of a number of good working relationship with the Francis Forbes Society will be highlighting powerful and influential figures in Britain, judges subsequently appointed on their Dowling's significant contribution to the including, in particular, Henry Brougham, respective retirements. development of the rule of law in New who subsequently became Lord Chancellor. South Wales, by publishing Dowling's By the early nineteenth century, the The legal system which greeted Dowling manuscript reports, called the Select importance of selective and accurate was also a novelty. The Supreme Court Cases, and through the Society's annual law reporting, as a feature of the had been established in 1824, under the lecture to be given on the topic 'Bringing development of the common law, Third Charter of Justice, 4 Geo. IV c.96. the Supreme Court to Order, 1828-1844'. was becoming increasingly recognised. The Supreme Court was invested with However, publication of law reports was a the powers and jurisdiction of all of the The key to understanding James Dowling somewhat haphazard affair, as evidenced Westminster Courts, and there were some is to appreciate that he was an extremely by the large number of nominate reports interesting variations in the modes of methodical, and organised lawyer, who prior to the establishment of the English trial available. Criminal matters were had a deep respect for the law and the Council of Law Reporting in 1865 which conducted by a judge with a military jury institutions of justice. His successor, Sir thereafter published the authorised of 7 officers appointed by the governor. Alfred Stephen, eulogised him as being reports. During his time at the Bar in Civil matters were largely conducted remarkable 'not only for the most strict England, Dowling was the joint publisher before a judge and two justices of the uprightness and impartiality, but for a of a nine volume set of King's Bench peace, called 'assessors'. From 1829, a jury painstaking and anxious industry rarely Reports, a single volume of Dowling and of twelve was available at the request of equaled'. Dowling apparently had 'great Ryland's 'Cases Argued and Ruled at Nisi either party in civil cases, this right was popularity' as a judge, and has been Prius in the Court of Kings Bench and on extended to many criminal trials in 1832, described as being genial with a good the Home Circuit' (now found in 171 ER), and military juries remained until 1839. sense of humour. He typically worked and a four volume set of Magistrates The question of trial by jury was an six days a week, he eschewed colonial Cases 1822-27. extremely contentious political issue in politics and public life - unlike his New South Wales, as it provided a focus predecessor Sir Francis Forbes - and Stepping off the boat in Sydney in 1828 for competing arguments between the was the quintessential lawyer's lawyer. in his full judicial regalia, Dowling was 'exclusives' and the 'emancipists' as to the Dowling arrived in the colony with his taken aback by the world which he nature of citizenship and distribution of first wife, Maria, and six children, and encountered. He was less than impressed power in the colony, rather than there lived on Woolloomooloo Hill (hence to find that Forbes CJ had dispensed with being any general dissatisfaction with South Dowling Street). Following the wearing his wig - he thought it gave him the quality of the verdicts of the military death of his first wife in 1834, he married 'a round head, a republican look', which juries. The course of this debate, and the Harriett Ritchie, a daughter of the Chief Justice Spigelman has noted was evolution of trial by jury in New South prominent colonial figure, John Blaxland. a particularly derisive remark for the Wales, was comprehensively examined period. Dowling thought that Forbes by Ian Barker QC in the inaugural Francis Dowling achieved his success through looked unwell, unhappy and at least ten Forbes Lecture in 2002, which the Society merit and hard work, rather than by any years older than his age of forty-three. has now published. excessive patronage or family wealth. His Of the other puisne judge, John Stephen, father, although qualified as a barrister Dowling thought he looked infirm, in Although rights of appeal to the Privy and experienced in parliamentary bad health and 'marked down for Council existed in certain civil cases, and reporting, earned a subsistence income another world'.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sydney Australia Inquests 1837.Pdf
    New South Wales Inquests, 1836; 05 June 2008 1 SYD1836 SYDNEY HERALD, 08/02/1836 Supreme Court of New South Wales Forbes C.J., 5 February 1836 On Friday last, an Aboriginal Black named Jack Congo Murrell, was indicted in the Supreme Court for the wilful murder of another Aboriginal Black named Jabbingee, at Windsor, when his Counsel put in the following ingenious and puzzling plea. In the Supreme Court, The King v. Jack Congo Murrell. ``And now the said Jack Congo Murrell in his own proper person comes, and having heard the Information aforesaid read, and protesting that he is not guilty of the premises charged in the said Information or any part thereof, for plea, nevertheless saith that he ought not to be compelled to answer to the said Information; because, he saith that the said Territory of New South Wales before and until the occupation thereof by his late Majesty King George the third, was inhabited by tribes of native blacks, who were regulated and governed by usages and customs of their own from time immemorial, practised and recognised amongst them, and not by the laws of statutes of Great Britain, and that ever since the occupation of the said Territory as aforesaid, the said tribes have continued to be, and still are regulated and governed by such usages and customs as aforesaid, - and not by the laws and statutes of Great Britain. And the said Jack Congo Murrell further saith that he is a native Black belonging to one of such tribes aforesaid, and that he is not now, nor at any time heretofore was a subject of the King of Great Britain and Ireland, nor was nor is subject to any of the laws or statutes of the Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • A History in Three Rivers
    A History in Three Rivers Dungog Shire Heritage Study Thematic History April 2012 Michael Williams Gresford Crossing source: Dungog Shire Heritage Study, Karskens, 1986 Ships at Clarence Town source: Dungog Shire Heritage Study Karskens, 1986 Mill on the Allyn River source: Dungog Shire Heritage Study, Karskens, 1986 carste STUDIO Pty Ltd Architects and Heritage Consultants ADDENDUM TO THEMATIC HISTORY 1 DUNGOG HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC COMMENTS ON ‘A HISTORY IN THREE RIVERS’ JANUARY 2014 The Dungog Historical Society makes the following observations for your consideration. They are intended to enhance the project. One of the general observations is ‘A History in Three Rivers’ is largely about wealthier or prominent males their roles and their activities. Professor Glenda Strachan has carried out detailed research on Dungog highlighting the role of women and children in poorer farming families. Because of the nature of the research it also gives insights into life for poorer rural men. See, for example ‘Women’s Work is Never Done” The intersection of Work and Family’ 2004http://www.griffith.edu.au/?a=314657 accessed 10 January 2014, G Strachan, E Jordan, H Carey, ‘Women’s Work in a Rural Community: Dungog and the Upper Williams Valley 1880- 1900’ Labour History No 78, 28 May 2000, p 7 and G Strachan ‘Assumed but Rarely Documented: Women’s Entrepreneurial Activities in Late Ninetieth Country Australia’ www.historycooperative.org/proceedings/asslh/strachan accessed 13/9/2006 p7 Second paragraph reference to Barton – the point of the visit was electioneering for his seat of Hunter, which included Dungog. The first elections were held later in the year and he was elected unopposed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Millstone
    The Millstone July – August 2013 www.kurrajonghistory.org.au ISSN 2201-0920 Vol 11 Issue 4 July – August 2013 THE MILLSTONE KURRAJONG ~ COMLEROY HISTORICAL SOCIETY The Kurrajong ~ Comleroy Historical Society is dedicated to researching, recording, preserving and promoting the growth of interest in the history of the Kurrajong district, the area west of the Hawkesbury River bounded by Bilpin and the Grose and Colo rivers THIS ISSUE Colo River tour 2 Four sumpter horses CAROLYNNE COOPER John Low OAM was the guest speaker at the general meeting held wenty people had booked to go on our tour to Colo on April 9 led by Wanda on 27 May. His talk covered the 1813 Deacon. We drove down Comleroy Road to the Upper Colo church where we crossing of the Blue Mountains with Twere given an informative tour, Powerpoint presentation and morning tea before an emphasis on the role played heading off on an adventure of a lifetime. by the four sumpter horses and It is difficult to say when the Colo River was first discovered as white settlers had how horses played a pivotal role in been living on the banks of the Colo River since the early 1800s with the first land most of the expeditions of the early grants being made in 1804. Initially it was called the second branch of the Hawkes- colony. bury River. William Parr on his way northward in 1817 wrote notes on the Colo as did Benjamin Singleton six months later, then John Howe went on an expedition to the 4 The Darkiñung Abstract Hunter in 1819 passing through the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Alfred Stephen and the Jury Question in Van Diemen's Land
    Sir Alfred Stephen and the Jury Question in Van Diemen's Land The Quest for Trial by Jury Just as a child grows and develops into an adult, it cannot but be in- fluenced by background, environment and social conditioning. So it was with the young Van Diemen's Land. Initially, there was the Eng- lish political, social and economic inheritance, which had a great ef- fect on the form of government adopted. Like an authoritarian parent stood the Imperial Parliament, but at the same time, offering some latitude for Van Diemen's Land to engage in some liberal develop- ment. Like a child, Van Diemen's Land offered little resistance. There was a Governor, a judiciary of sorts, and an administrative bu- reaucracy with control over Van Diemen's Land by way of legislation of the Imperial Parliament, such as that of 182 3, 182 8 and 1842. This control led to Van Diemen's Land becoming firmly under the grip of Mother England. The colony now consisted of free settlers, convicts and emancipists, and a few Aboriginals. The colonists must have coined the Nike catch phrase 'Just Do It (for yourself)!' for they sought to enhance their own success and to empower themselves. This was consistent with the attitude of imperialist conquerors throughout the old British Em- pire: to get what they could for themselves in the way of wealth, con- trol and power. There is no better example of this than Governor George Arthur, a career civil servant who amassed a fortune as a landowner and trader, not only in Van Diemen's Land but in other colonies where he saw service.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Queensland Memoir Writer^
    Some Queensland Memoir Writer^. Presidential Address, by F. W. S. CUMBRAE-STEWART, B.A., B.O.L. At Annual Meeting of the Historical Society of Queensland, Friday, 30th August, 1918. Five years have passed since the inaugural meeting of this Society was held under the chairmanship of His Excellency, Sir William Macgregor, then Governor of Queensland and patron of the Society. During the time which has elapsed much history has been made, and the events which have shaken the world have not been favourable to quiet historical research, and I think that the Society must be congratulated on having maintained its existence in spite of so much that has hindered its work. Other difficulties overshadowed us. Before the first year had passed several of our members had died, and Sir William Macgregor had completed his useful and unstinted official service to the Empire. His retirement from the Governorship of Queensland removed him from us to his native;land. None of us who were privileged to be present will forget that morning when, on 15th July, 1914, he said farewell to us. Then came the war, which the wise had foretold, but the foolish ones had thought- was impossible. At one time the question of suspending the Society's operations was considered, but it was decided to carry on. When Sir Wm. Macgregor's successor arrived, he gave very ready and material help by taking the Society under his patronage. There are Others who have passed from our midst whose places we can never fill. Each year has added its toll.
    [Show full text]
  • A LETTER from ARTHUR HODGSON to HENRY STUART RUSSELL the Genesis of Queensland
    211 A LETTER FROM ARTHUR HODGSON TO HENRY STUART RUSSELL The Genesis of Queensland SIR ARTHUR HODGSON The Editor has received from Mr. Alec. H. Chisholm, ornithologist and historian, and a Fellow of the Society, a copy of a letter sent by Arthur Hodgson' to Henry Stuart Russell,^ which is of historic interest. It relates to the pub­ lication of Russell's book "The Genesis of Queensland."^ The letter was dated 9 March 1888. It read as foUows: Clopton House, Stratford on Avon. "My Dear Russell, "Yesterday 'The Genesis of Queensland' reached me from Sydney by parcel-post. It was a long time en route, our son Edward, manager of Eton Vale, having written to us that the book was in his possession, and received favourable reviews, had been forwarded by him to Clopton. 212 "I called last week, when in London, at several bookseUers, but they knew nothing, and at Stamford's, Charing Cross, I was told that such a book would be in great request, as Queensland, owing to its vast mineral resources, was largely in the ascendant. "I have sent them the name of the pubUsher, and to Bumper's in Oxford Street, etc., etc., and at the Colonial Institute your book was unknown. "I hope that the pubUshers have their agents in London, and that they have forwarded at least 100 copies, which I feel assured would find a very ready sale. "All this by way of introduction, and I may add that as soon as our friend RoUeston'' told me that such a book was on the stocks, I immediately (in May last) ordered two copies.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the Blue Mountains Association of Cultural Heritage Organisations Inc May-June 2021 ISSUE 74 ISSN 2203-4366
    Heritage Newsletter of the Blue Mountains Association of Cultural Heritage Organisations Inc May-June 2021 ISSUE 74 ISSN 2203-4366 Acknowledgement of Country BMACHO acknowledges and pays respect to the past, present and future Traditional Custodians and Elders of this nation and the continuation of cultural, spiritual and educational practices of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Sir Francis Forbes, first Chief Justice of NSW (1784-1841) Sir Francis Forbes was the first Chief Justice of New South Wales, appointed to oversee the reform of the administration of law and order in the colony of New South Wales, following the inquiry into the colony's affairs by Commissioner Bigge and Bigge’s subsequent reports of 1822 and 1823. Bigge's investigations began in 1819 following the far reaching changes made in the Colony by Governor Lachlan Macquarie. Before Forbes set up the court system in Australia, people were tried by legal tribunals. Bigge was keen to grant greater jurisdiction to the Local Courts which had previously been administered from England. In the early 1830s Sir Francis Forbes owned the only estate west of the Nepean River, at Emu Plains. Forbes was granted 120 acres at Emu Plains and also 2,560 acres in the Upper Hunter Valley. This land at Muswellbrook, was increased by purchase and used as a cattle run known as Skellatar (Skellater). Edinglassie, Emu Plains, by Conrad Martens 1835 The Edinglassie (or Edenglassie) land grant was at the southern end of Emu Plains, south of Jamison Creek, and upstream from the Emu Plains prison farm, being named after one of 1 HERITAGE May-June 2021 the Forbes family estates in Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hon Tf Bathurst Chief Justice
    THE HON T F BATHURST CHIEF JUSTICE OF NEW SOUTH WALES FRANCIS FORBES SOCIETY AUSTRALIAN LEGAL HISTORY ‘A TOUGH NUT TO CRACK’1: THE HISTORY OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION IN NEW SOUTH WALES THURSDAY 19 SEPTEMBER 2019* INTRODUCTION 1. I would like to begin by respectfully acknowledging the traditional custodians of the land on which we meet, the Gadigal people of the Eora nation, and pay my respects to their Elders, past, present and emerging. As I will discuss later in this tutorial, the first legal system in Australia belonged to that of Australia’s Indigenous people. We acknowledge and respect the ongoing laws and customs of the traditional custodians of this land. 2. If any of you are here to hear about the development of the law of New South Wales or the history of its courts, you are sure to be disappointed. To console you there will be plenty of these lectures during the Court’s bicentenary in a few years’ time. This speech is about the profession itself, not the law, Courts or judiciary. 3. A traditional view of the advent of the legal profession in New South Wales would focus exclusively on the advent of solicitors, both free and former- convict, and barristers in the emerging penal Colony. However, far too often we conflate the start of the legal profession in New South Wales with the start of the legal profession for men. The advent of the legal profession for women did not occur until over a century later, and regrettably, even later for Australia’s Indigenous peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • “To the Dowlings Who Served in America's Wars”
    “to the Dowlings who served in America's wars” A MEMORIAL PLAQUE PRESENTED BY. MAUD DOWLING TURNER AT THE 1946 DOWLING FAMILY REUNION MEETING HAMPTON, SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLISHER’S NOTE Maud Dowling Turner authored this document in 1946 for the dedication of a plaque honoring those in the Dowling Family who served in America’s wars – from the Revolutionary War through World War II. It was presented at the Dowling Family Reunion in Hampton South Carolina that year. I obtained my copy from a cousin. It contains a great deal of history of the Dowling family. Since it is apparently no longer in print, I have prepared this copy to assist other Dowlings in the search for their family’s history. The Dowlings honored on the plaque and in this publication are members of the Robert Dowling family, chiefly Robert’s descendants by his son James and James’ son John. This copy was prepared using Optical Character Recognition of a copy of the original. Due to the differing styles and formatting of the original, the OCR software had difficulty with many words. While I have attempted to proofread it carefully, if you find any apparent typographical errors, please contact me and I will check them against the original. I have attempted to retain the original wording and punctuation as closely as possible. However, I have resized and relocated the photographs to place them beside the story of the person in the photograph. I also changed the original two-column layout in order to format it for the Web. The few changes or additions I have made to the text are contained within brackets [ ].
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Plunkett's Disappointment
    [2006] ANZLH E-Journal PLUNKETT’S DISAPPOINTMENT: THE REVELANCE OF CATHOLICISM TO A JUDICIAL APPOINTMENT TO THE NEW SOUTH WALES BENCH IN THE 1840s Tony Earls* Prior to the introduction of responsible government in 1856, New South Wales had three Chief Justices, successively; Forbes, Dowling and Stephen. The Crown appointed Forbes on the advice of the Colonial Office in London. With the appointments of Dowling and Stephen, the Colonial Office looked to the advice of the Governor of New South Wales to make an appointment from within the local legal profession. Although William Burton challenged Dowling’s claim to succeed Forbes on a question of seniority, it was the events that led up to the appointment of Stephen, involving two highly credentialed and ambitious candidates, that first tested substantial questions as to rights of precedence and other factors relevant to the appointment. It need hardly be said that the appointment was, and is, a prestigious and important one. However, in order to consider the implications of an appointment, it is useful to attempt to explain why. For the individual, it is the pinnacle of any legal career, affording status and power in their own time and posterity thereafter. In the first half of the nineteenth century this was particularly true when it came to questions of social and governmental rank.1 Amongst other things, a Chief Justice might expect a knighthood following appointment as Chief Justice. As a force in society, the primary influence of a Chief Justice relates not only to the judgement of major cases, but to the administration of the courts, the keystone of the legal system.
    [Show full text]
  • Biography: John Charles Blaxland
    Biography: John Charles Blaxland John Blaxland is Professor of International Security and Intelligence Studies, Director of the ANU Southeast Asia Institute and, since March 2017, Head (acting) of the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre at ANU, overseeing its three degree programs. He is also a Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy and Fellow of the Royal Society of New South Wales. In addition, he is an active member of the ANU Academic Board as well as the Australian Army Journal editorial board and an occasional commentator in the print, television and radio media. He is a US Department of Defense Minerva Research Initiative grant recipient, and speaks English, Thai and Spanish. John holds a PhD in War Studies from the Royal Military College of Canada, an MA in History from ANU and a BA (Hons 1) from UNSW. He is a graduate of the Royal Thai Army Command & Staff College (dux, foreign students) and the Royal Military College, Duntroon (Blamey Scholar). He has extensive experience in the intelligence community including as the principal intelligence staff officer for the Australian brigade in East Timor in September 1999, as an intelligence exchange officer in Washington DC, as Director Joint Intelligence Operations (J2), at Headquarters Joint Operations Command (2006/7) and as a lead author of the three-volume history of ASIO. In addition he was Australia’s Defence Attaché to Thailand and Myanmar. He teaches “Honeypots and Overcoats: Australian Intelligence in the World” and supervises a number of students undertaking higher degrees by research. His publications and research interests concern intelligence and the security arms of government, Australian military history and strategy, defence studies, military operations (including East Timor, Korea, Iraq and Afghanistan); international relations, notably on South-east Asia (Thailand, Myanmar, Timor Leste, Indonesia, South China Sea, ASEAN), and North America, (Canada/United States).
    [Show full text]
  • Attachments of Ordinary Council Meeting
    ATTACHMENTS FOR: AGENDA NO. 9/19 COUNCIL MEETING Meeting Date: Tuesday 27 August 2019 Location: Council Chambers, Level 1A, 1 Pope Street, Ryde Time: 7.00pm ATTACHMENTS FOR COUNCIL MEETING Item 9 PLANNING PROPOSAL - 68 DENISTONE ROAD, DENISTONE - OUTCOMES OF EXHIBITION Attachment 10 Submission from Property Owner Mills Oakley Lawyers ABN: 51 493 069 734 28 June 2019 Your ref: Our ref: MDSS/KXMS/3382833 All correspondence to: PO Box H316 ^ AUSTRALIA SQUARE NSW 1215 General Manager Contact City of Ryde Kate Marginson +61 2 8035 7850 Locked Bag 2069, Email: kmarginson@millsoakley.com.au NORTH RYDE, NSW 1670 Partner Matt Sonter +61 2 8035 7851 cityofryde@ryde.nsw.gov.au Email: msonter@millsoakley.com.au Dear General Manager Planning Proposal PP_2019_RYDEC_001_00 Proposal to list 68 Denistone Road, Denistone as a heritage item in the Ryde Local Environmental Plan 2014 (Council reference D19/79644) (Planning Proposal) We refer to the above Planning Proposal, which was issued a gateway determination by a delegate for the Minister for Planning on 4 April 2018. The Planning proposal seeks to list the property at 68 Denistone Road, Denistone as a heritage item in the Ryde Local Environmental Plan 2014 (RLEP). We act for the owner of the property at 68 Denistone Road, Denistone (the site) and make this submission on their behalf. Our client strongly objects to the listing of the site as a heritage item for the reasons set out in this submission. We are also writing to you to express serious concerns about the process which has been undertaken prior to the application to the Minster for a gateway determination in respect of the site and to bring to your attention the compelling and contradictory evidence which militates strongly against the proposed listing of the site as a heritage item.
    [Show full text]