DOCSLIB.ORG

Seed Conditioning of Understory Forbs in The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seed Conditioning of Understory Forbs in The USDAUSDA ForestForest ServiceService NationalNational SeedSeed LaboratoryLaboratory www.nsl.fs.fed.us SeedSeed ConditioningConditioning ofof UnderstoryUnderstory ForbsForbs inin thethe LongleafLongleaf PinePine EcosystemEcosystem Jill Barbour, [email protected] Jeff Glitzenstein, [email protected] 2007 Wildflower Symposium, Orlando Florida Ground Layer Plants Project PartnerPartner withwith USUS FishFish && WildlifeWildlife (Jim(Jim Bates)Bates) groundground layerlayer plantsplants Alabama,Alabama, Georgia,Georgia, SouthSouth CarolinaCarolina SeedSeed collectioncollection (2005,(2005, 2006)2006) SeedSeed cleaningcleaning (2006,(2006, 2007)2007) LaboratoryLaboratory andand nurserynursery germinationgermination NurseryNursery propagationpropagation OutplantingOutplanting 26 Genera of Forbs Ageratina Lespedeza Amsonia Liatris Aster Manfreda Baptisia Melanthera Chamaecrista Mimosa Chrysopsis Pityopsis Coreopsis Polygonella Desmodium Silphium Erythrina Solidago Eupatorium Tephrosia Galactia Tetragonotheca Helianthus Vernonia Heliopsis Uniola Flow chart of seed conditioning Remove seed from in fluorescent First step First step with brush machine Second step Aspirate Or Use blowers Remove sticks with screens or indent cylinder Third step Remove lighter weight material with blowers Fourth step or specific gravity table Hand pick out debris for small lots Fifth step Sixth step Prepare sample for seed testing and storage Brush machine to extract seed from fruits Conditioning Equipment Brush machine Screens Aspirator Indent cylinder Scarifier Stultz General Blower Coreopsis major, tickseed Seed coming out chute GravityGravity tabletable GerminationGermination UpperUpper 32%32% LowLowerer 12%12% AfterAfter cleaningcleaning 27%27% Aspirating seed Eupatorium album , white thoroughwort FlowerFlower HandHand cleanclean ChuteChute endend TreatmentTreatment (Echaw Rd.) %Germ%Germ Bottom, bottom Stultz 16.0 Chute, top Stultz 24.0 Chute, indent 12/64” 23.0 Hand clean 33.0 BottomBottom brushbrush 21 day count on machine cleaning Helianthus atrorubens, purpledisk sunflower NoNo cleanclean 7.0%7.0% ChuteChute endend 17.0%17.0% BottomBottom 48.0%48.0% 16 day count on machine cleaning Polygonella americana, southern jointweed TetrazoliumTetrazolium 55.0%55.0% GerminationGermination 2.0%2.0% NurseryNursery 0.0%0.0% Vernonia angustifolia, tall ironweed LocationLocation unstratunstrat stratstrat EchawEchaw 1.5%1.5% 20.5%20.5% FMNFFMNF 11/1/0611/1/06 9.0%9.0% 29.5%29.5% FMNFFMNF 11/29/0611/29/06 15.0%15.0% 26.0%26.0% FMNFFMNF (Brush,(Brush, Stultz)Stultz) 78.5% Erythrina herbacea, coral bean Forsberg 100% Forsberg (clip) 93% Brush 1st run 78% Brush 2nd (unnicked) 96% Brush 2nd (nicked) 97% Lespedeza capitata TypeType %% DormantDormant CoveredCovered 14%14% 8080 GreenGreen 44%44% 4444 BrownBrown 32%32% 2424 Lespedeza hirta, hairy lespedeza TypeType %% %% DormantDormant Brown,Brown, sunksunk 3939 6060 Brown,Brown, floatfloat 2626 1919 Green,Green, sunksunk 2020 3232 Green,Green, floatfloat 3333 00 Tephrosia virginiana , Goat’s Rue HandHand cleanedcleaned 54%54% ForsbergForsberg 55%55% BrushBrush machinemachine 65%65% Tetragonotheca helianthoides Tetrazolium 88.0% Germination: unstratified 0.0% stratified 0.0% Nursery 0.0% Uniola paniculata, sea oats MantleMantle BrusBrushheess %Germination%Germination 10 square wire medium 1.27 16 square wire soft 19.0 16 light wire medium 17.0 bottom 16 light wire medium 32.0 chute end American Tree Seedling Nursery Ground layer plant nursery germination Nursery and Laboratory Germination Results Species Nursery % Lab % Comments Comments germ germ 2005 seed collections Aster linariifolius 41 30 2007 Aster tortifolius 0( 2006) 27;20 No prechill; 28 day prechill 91 (2007) 41 (2007) Winter sowing Baptisia lanceolata 2 6 Brown 61%61% dormant 11 Green 73%73% dormant Chrysopsis gossypina 1 23 40% after cleaning Chrysopsis mariana 74 59 Coreopsis major 9 32 upper 12% lower 27%27% after cleaning Desmodium spp. 12 33 Brown 22 Green Eupatorium album 0 4 40% dormant Echaw Rd. 28(2007) 19% cleaned 18 day count Helianthus atrobuens 32 7 2007 Liatris graminifolia 14 54 2007 Liatris secunda 3 62 Before cleaning 17%17% after cleaning Mimosa quadrivalvis 23 14 Pityopsis graminifolia 0 2(2(2006)2006) FMNF 84 (2007) Tephrosia virginiana 28 25 Vernonia angustifolia 2 4 After cleanniing Lab and Nursery Germination 2006 95 90 85 80 75 70 91 o65n i60 55 inat50 45 m40 e35r 30 25G %20 41 74 15 10 5 59 0 Aster 6 2 Baptisia 32 Chrysopsis 33 9 Coreopsis 12 62 Desmodium 32 4 Eupatorium 0 7 Nu Helianthus rs e 33 ry g Liatris before 17 e r m 23 Liatris after 14 Mimosa 28 25 2 Pityopsis 0 Lab ger Tephrosia 4 2 m Vernonia Percentage of Filled Cells in Nursery (2007 seed) 99 99 99 95 95 89 91.1 90 49.3 29.3 30 24.7 10.2 3.4 2.2 Solidago Agertina Pityopsis Heliopsis Vernonia Vernonia Coreopsis Chrysopsis Helianthus Eupatorium Eupatorium L. squarrosa A. tortifolius A. Aster concolor A. linariifolius linariifolius A. L. graminifolia graminifolia L. Liatris elegans elegans Liatris Species Conclusions UseUse aa softersofter mantlemantle inin brushbrush machinemachine forfor LiatrisLiatris andand otherother speciesspecies AsteraceaeAsteraceae familyfamily difficultdifficult toto cleanclean-- brushbrush machinemachine createscreates muchmuch debrisdebris LegumesLegumes cleanclean easilyeasily inin brushbrush machinemachine andand ForsbergForsberg scarifierscarifier VernoniaVernonia angustifoliaangustifolia seedseed benefitsbenefits fromfrom prechillingprechilling InsectInsect predationpredation detrimentaldetrimental toto germinationgermination (2007(2007 seedseed betterbetter thanthan 2006)2006) ExpensiveExpensive toto obtainobtain puritypurity overover 90%90% GrassesGrasses easyeasy toto cleanclean withwith brushbrush machinemachine Future of project CollectCollect moremore seedseed butbut fromfrom fewerfewer plantsplants FineFine tunetune thethe conditioningconditioning processprocess DetermineDetermine prechillingprechilling andand germinationgermination temperaturestemperatures NeedNeed storagestorage informationinformation MonitorMonitor nurserynursery propagationpropagation MonitorMonitor seedlingsseedlings inin thethe fieldfield CreateCreate seedseed productionproduction areasareas PublishPublish results,results, createcreate seedseed cleaningcleaning manualmanual .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversidad Y Distribución De La Familia Asteraceae En México
    Taxonomía y florística Diversidad y distribución de la familia Asteraceae en México JOSÉ LUIS VILLASEÑOR Botanical Sciences 96 (2): 332-358, 2018 Resumen Antecedentes: La familia Asteraceae (o Compositae) en México ha llamado la atención de prominentes DOI: 10.17129/botsci.1872 botánicos en las últimas décadas, por lo que cuenta con una larga tradición de investigación de su riqueza Received: florística. Se cuenta, por lo tanto, con un gran acervo bibliográfico que permite hacer una síntesis y actua- October 2nd, 2017 lización de su conocimiento florístico a nivel nacional. Accepted: Pregunta: ¿Cuál es la riqueza actualmente conocida de Asteraceae en México? ¿Cómo se distribuye a lo February 18th, 2018 largo del territorio nacional? ¿Qué géneros o regiones requieren de estudios más detallados para mejorar Associated Editor: el conocimiento de la familia en el país? Guillermo Ibarra-Manríquez Área de estudio: México. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo una exhaustiva revisión de literatura florística y taxonómica, así como la revi- sión de unos 200,000 ejemplares de herbario, depositados en más de 20 herbarios, tanto nacionales como del extranjero. Resultados: México registra 26 tribus, 417 géneros y 3,113 especies de Asteraceae, de las cuales 3,050 son especies nativas y 1,988 (63.9 %) son endémicas del territorio nacional. Los géneros más relevantes, tanto por el número de especies como por su componente endémico, son Ageratina (164 y 135, respecti- vamente), Verbesina (164, 138) y Stevia (116, 95). Los estados con mayor número de especies son Oaxa- ca (1,040), Jalisco (956), Durango (909), Guerrero (855) y Michoacán (837). Los biomas con la mayor riqueza de géneros y especies son el bosque templado (1,906) y el matorral xerófilo (1,254).
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY 0 NCTMBER 52 Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae Harold Robinson, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, andJames F. Weedin SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1981 ABSTRACT Robinson, Harold, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, and James F. Weedin. Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae. Smithsonian Contri- butions to Botany, number 52, 28 pages, 3 tables, 1981.-Chromosome reports are provided for 145 populations, including first reports for 33 species and three genera, Garcilassa, Riencourtia, and Helianthopsis. Chromosome numbers are arranged according to Robinson’s recently broadened concept of the Heliantheae, with citations for 212 of the ca. 265 genera and 32 of the 35 subtribes. Diverse elements, including the Ambrosieae, typical Heliantheae, most Helenieae, the Tegeteae, and genera such as Arnica from the Senecioneae, are seen to share a specialized cytological history involving polyploid ancestry. The authors disagree with one another regarding the point at which such polyploidy occurred and on whether subtribes lacking higher numbers, such as the Galinsoginae, share the polyploid ancestry. Numerous examples of aneuploid decrease, secondary polyploidy, and some secondary aneuploid decreases are cited. The Marshalliinae are considered remote from other subtribes and close to the Inuleae. Evidence from related tribes favors an ultimate base of X = 10 for the Heliantheae and at least the subfamily As teroideae. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIESCOVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the katsura tree Cercidiphyllumjaponicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Chromosome numbers in Compositae, XII.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program Plant Species List
    Plant Species Page 1 of 19 Home ER Feedback What's New More on PNHP slpecies Lit't~s• " All Species Types " Plants " Vertebrates " Invertebrates Plant Species List " Geologic Features Species " Natural By Community Types Coun ty.FiN Watershed I * Rank and ý7hOW all Species: Status Definitions Records Can Be Sorted By Clicking Column Name * Species Fact Export list to Text Sheets Proposed Global State State Federal Scientific Name Common Name State Rank Rank Status Status * County Natural Status Three-seeded Heritage Acalypha dearnii G4? Sx N PX Mercury Inventories Aconitum reclinatum White Monkshood G3 S1 PE PE (PDF) Aconitum uncinaturn Blue Monkshood G4 S2 PT PT Acorus americanus Sweet Flag G5 S1 PE PE Aleutian Adiantum aleuticum G5? SNR TU TU * Plant Maidenhair Fern Community Aeschynomene Sensitive Joint- G2 Sx PX PX LT Information virginica vetch (PDF)' Eared False- Agalinis auriculata G3 $1 PE PE foxglove Blue-ridge False- Agalinis decemloba G4Q Sx PX PX foxglove o PNDI Project Small-flowered Agalinis paupercula G5 S1 PE PE Planning False-foxglove Environmental Agrostis altissima Tall Bentgrass G4 Sx PX PX Review Aletris farinosa Colic-root G5 S1 TU PE Northern Water- Alisma triviale G5 S1 PE PE NOTE:Clicking plantain this link opens a Alnus viridis Mountain Alder G5 S1 PE PE new browser Alopecurus aequalis Short-awn Foxtail G5 S3 N TU PS window Amaranthus Waterhemp G5 S3 PR PR cannabinus Ragweed Amelanchier Oblong-fruited G5 $1 PE PE bartramiana Serviceberry Amelanchier Serviceberry G5 SNR N UEF canadensis http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/PlantsPage.aspx
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    SYSTEMATICA OF ARNICA, SUBGENUS AUSTROMONTANA AND A NEW SUBGENUS, CALARNICA (ASTERACEAE:SENECIONEAE) by GERALD BANE STRALEY B.Sc, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 1968 M.Sc, Ohio University, 1974 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Botany) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA March 1980 © Gerald Bane Straley, 1980 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department nf Botany The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 26 March 1980 ABSTRACT Seven species are recognized in Arnica subgenus Austromontana and two species in a new subgenus Calarnica based on a critical review and conserva• tive revision of the species. Chromosome numbers are given for 91 populations representing all species, including the first reports for Arnica nevadensis. Results of apomixis, vegetative reproduction, breeding studies, and artifi• cial hybridizations are given. Interrelationships of insect pollinators, leaf miners, achene feeders, and floret feeders are presented. Arnica cordifolia, the ancestral species consists largely of tetraploid populations, which are either autonomous or pseudogamous apomicts, and to a lesser degree diploid, triploid, pentaploid, and hexaploid populations.
    [Show full text]
  • ISB: Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants
    Longleaf Pine Preserve Plant List Acanthaceae Asteraceae Wild Petunia Ruellia caroliniensis White Aster Aster sp. Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia Adoxaceae Begger-ticks Bidens mitis Walter's Viburnum Viburnum obovatum Deer Tongue Carphephorus paniculatus Pineland Daisy Chaptalia tomentosa Alismataceae Goldenaster Chrysopsis gossypina Duck Potato Sagittaria latifolia Cow Thistle Cirsium horridulum Tickseed Coreopsis leavenworthii Altingiaceae Elephant's foot Elephantopus elatus Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua Oakleaf Fleabane Erigeron foliosus var. foliosus Fleabane Erigeron sp. Amaryllidaceae Prairie Fleabane Erigeron strigosus Simpson's rain lily Zephyranthes simpsonii Fleabane Erigeron vernus Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium Anacardiaceae Dog Fennel Eupatorium compositifolium Winged Sumac Rhus copallinum Dog Fennel Eupatorium spp. Poison Ivy Toxicodendron radicans Slender Flattop Goldenrod Euthamia caroliniana Flat-topped goldenrod Euthamia minor Annonaceae Cudweed Gamochaeta antillana Flag Pawpaw Asimina obovata Sneezeweed Helenium pinnatifidum Dwarf Pawpaw Asimina pygmea Blazing Star Liatris sp. Pawpaw Asimina reticulata Roserush Lygodesmia aphylla Rugel's pawpaw Deeringothamnus rugelii Hempweed Mikania cordifolia White Topped Aster Oclemena reticulata Apiaceae Goldenaster Pityopsis graminifolia Button Rattlesnake Master Eryngium yuccifolium Rosy Camphorweed Pluchea rosea Dollarweed Hydrocotyle sp. Pluchea Pluchea spp. Mock Bishopweed Ptilimnium capillaceum Rabbit Tobacco Pseudognaphalium obtusifolium Blackroot Pterocaulon virgatum
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Plants of Northeastern Utah
    MOUNTAIN PLANTS OF NORTHEASTERN UTAH Original booklet and drawings by Berniece A. Andersen and Arthur H. Holmgren Revised May 1996 HG 506 FOREWORD In the original printing, the purpose of this manual was to serve as a guide for students, amateur botanists and anyone interested in the wildflowers of a rather limited geographic area. The intent was to depict and describe over 400 common, conspicuous or beautiful species. In this revision we have tried to maintain the intent and integrity of the original. Scientific names have been updated in accordance with changes in taxonomic thought since the time of the first printing. Some changes have been incorporated in order to make the manual more user-friendly for the beginner. The species are now organized primarily by floral color. We hope that these changes serve to enhance the enjoyment and usefulness of this long-popular manual. We would also like to thank Larry A. Rupp, Extension Horticulture Specialist, for critical review of the draft and for the cover photo. Linda Allen, Assistant Curator, Intermountain Herbarium Donna H. Falkenborg, Extension Editor Utah State University Extension is an affirmative action/equal employment opportunity employer and educational organization. We offer our programs to persons regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or disability. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Robert L. Gilliland, Vice-President and Director, Cooperative Extension
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Cytotoxicity of Selected Medicinal and Nonmedicinal Plant Extracts to Microbial and Cervical Cancer Cells
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology Volume 2012, Article ID 106746, 4 pages doi:10.1155/2012/106746 Research Article Cytotoxicity of Selected Medicinal and Nonmedicinal Plant Extracts to Microbial and Cervical Cancer Cells Gary M. Booth,1 Robert D. Malmstrom,1 Erica Kipp,2 and Alexandra Paul1 1 Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA 2 The New York Botanical Garden, 200th Street and Kazimiroff Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10458-5126, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Gary M. Booth, gary [email protected] Received 2 August 2011; Accepted 16 December 2011 Academic Editor: Ikhlas A. Khan Copyright © 2012 Gary M. Booth et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This study investigated the cytotoxicity of 55 species of plants. Each plant was rated as medicinal, or nonmedicinal based on the existing literature. About 79% of the medicinal plants showed some cytotoxicity, while 75% of the nonmedicinal plants showed bioactivity. It appears that Asteraceae, Labiatae, Pinaceae, and Chenopodiaceae were particularly active against human cervical cancer cells. Based on the literature, only three of the 55 plants have been significantly investigated for cytotoxicity. It is clear that there is much toxicological work yet to be done with both medicinal and nonmedicinal plants. 1. Introduction with the most medicinal species. It was hoped that our data might show some trends of toxicity within medicinally rich There is a one-in-four chance that a drug used from any families.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Golden Aster Chrysopsis (=Heterotheca) Floridana Small
    Florida Golden Aster Chrysopsis (=Heterotheca) floridana Small he Florida golden aster is a perennial herb in the Federal Status: Endangered (May 16, 1986) aster family with a distribution limited to a few Critical Habitat: None Designated Tcounties in west-central Florida. The Florida golden Florida Status: Endangered aster occurs in sand pine and oak scrub or in disturbed areas at the edges of scrub. Recovery Plan Status: Contribution (May 1999) This account represents South Floridas contribution to Geographic Coverage: South Florida the existing recovery plan for the Florida golden aster (FWS 1988). Figure 1. County distribution of the Florida golden aster. Description Chrysopsis floridana is a perennial herb with stems that are woody toward the base and non-woody above. The plants have basal rosettes (clusters of leaves at ground level) with leaves 4 to 10 cm long, 1.5 to 2.0 cm wide; the leaves of the rosette are densely short-wooly pubescent. The stem leaves are nearly the same size from the top to the bottom of the stem; they are obovate-elliptic, slightly clasping the stem, entire, and densely short-wooly pubescent. The flower heads are grouped into a more or less flat-topped cluster of 1 to 25 heads at the top of the stem. Each head is slightly over 2.5 cm in diameter. Both the central disc and the rays are golden yellow. C. floridana is distinguished from other members of its genus by its perennial habit, the woodiness of its stems, the wooliness and the shape of the stem and the leaves, and the way the flower heads are arranged in a flat-topped cluster (Semple 1981, Wunderlin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • CLADISTIC ANALYSIS of COMPLEX NATURAL PRODUCTS: DEVELOPING TRANSFORMATION SERIES from SESQUITERPENE LACTONE DATA Fred C. Seaman1
    TAXON 32(1): 1-27. FEBRUARY 1983 CLADISTIC ANALYSIS OF COMPLEX NATURAL PRODUCTS: DEVELOPING TRANSFORMATION SERIES FROM SESQUITERPENE LACTONE DATA Fred C. Seaman1 and V. A. Funk1 Summary In the Asteraceae, the two most taxonomically significant aspects of the sesquiterpene lactone chemistry are the patterns of skeletal and substitutional diversity. Sesquiterpene lactones can be subdivided into different classes based on their carbon skeletons. Superimposed on each skeleton is a set of substituents which collectively define a specific compound. Both skeletal classes and substi- tutional features display taxonomically useful patterns of distribution. A cladistic technique is demonstrated for converting these chemical features into taxonomic char- acters. Each character is derived via a biosynthetically based evaluation of structural diversity and determination of structural homology. Each set of homologous skeletal and substitutional characters from a taxon is arranged in a biogenetic transformation series. Outgroup comparison is used to determine the polarity of each character transformation series. The distribution of the resulting novel (apomorphic) skeletal and substitutional characters within this taxon are then used to generate a cladogram depicting the chemical synapomorphies. The chemistries of the taxa, Tetragonotheca L. and Iva L. (Asteraceae: Heliantheae), provide the two examples for the four-step cladistic analysis. The methods employed in this analysis of sesquiterpene lactone distribution may also be applicable to other classes of complex natural products. Introduction Complex plant natural products represent a biosynthetically diverse array of compounds which are characterized by skeletal, substitutional and stereochemical variability. Several major classes of natural products included within this group are sesquiterpenes, diterpenes, triterpenes (saponins, cardenolides, etc.), alkaloids (monoterpene-indole alkaloids, apor- phine alkaloids, etc.) and isoflavonoid derivatives (pterocarpans).
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Intelligence
    [ 599 ] PART III. MEDICAL INTELLIGENCE. CHEMISTRY. Liquidhation and Solidification of Carbonic Acid Gas.?It is well known that it has long been an important problem in practical Chemistry, to re- duce to the liquid and solid form those gaseous bodies, which, being hither- to only known in the gaseous shape, have been very generally denominat- ed by chemists permanently elasticJluids. This denomination, there is now reason to presume, from the advanced progress of chemistry, and the in- creased power of its resources, will be no longer justly applicable. It is known, at least, that chemists have lately succeeded in liquefying carbonic acid gas, or causing it to assume the form of a liquid, chiefly by means of very great pressure. Mr Faraday, in this country, made the gas assume a liquid form, by subjecting it, within a strong glass tube, to the pressure of 36 atmospheres at 32? of Fahrenheit's thermometer; and M. Thilorier of Paris produced in 1835 the same result in a similar manner. (Annalesde Chimie et de Physique, Tom. lx. p. 427 and 432. Paris 1835.) In this state, if allowed to escape, it immediately evaporates, and a most intense degree of cold, estimated at?180?, is produced, while part of the carbonic acid is converted into the solid form, in the shape of small whitish woolly flocks or masses, which are intensely cold, and which adhere so strongly to the walls of the glass, that it is impossible to get it out by any other method than breaking the flask. This is the solidified gas ; in other words, a substance supposed to be permanently elastic and gaseous, con- verted into a solid.
    [Show full text]