Good News for Gorillas As Poachers Change Their Ways
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan Paniscus)
EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan paniscus) Editors: Dr Jeroen Stevens Contact information: Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp – K. Astridplein 26 – B 2018 Antwerp, Belgium Email: [email protected] Name of TAG: Great Ape TAG TAG Chair: Dr. María Teresa Abelló Poveda – Barcelona Zoo [email protected] Edition: First edition - 2020 1 2 EAZA Best Practice Guidelines disclaimer Copyright (February 2020) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in these EAZA Best Practice Guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable. EAZA and the EAZA APE TAG make a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of the data in its reports, publications, and services. However, EAZA does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information. EAZA disclaims all liability for errors or omissions that may exist and shall not be liable for any incidental, consequential, or other damages (whether resulting from negligence or otherwise) including, without limitation, exemplary damages or lost profits arising out of or in connection with the use of this publication. Because the technical information provided in the EAZA Best Practice Guidelines can easily be misread or misinterpreted unless properly analysed, EAZA strongly recommends that users of this information consult with the editors in all matters related to data analysis and interpretation. -
Legendz Sports Defendants
LEGENDZ SPORTS DEFENDANTS NAME AGE RESIDENCE 1. BARTICE ALAN KING (a/k/a “Luke” “Cool”) 42 Spring, TX 2. SERENA MONEEQUE KING 43 Spring, TX 3. SPIROS ATHANAS (a/k/a “The Greek”) 53 Gilford, NH 4. ROBERT JOSEPH ROLLY (a/k/a “Bob”) 79 Key West, FL 5. KASSANDRA BATES 43 Panama (a/k/a “Sandra” “Sandra Teresita Vargas Farrier”) 6. WILLIAM JAMES BATES 59 Panama (a/k/a “Bill” “Billy” “Wild Bill”) 7. EDWARD LOUIS BUONANNO 50 Spring, TX (a/k/a “Gooch” “Bubbles”) 8. KORY ELWIN KORALEWSKI (a/k/a “Ski”) 42 Parker, CO 9. MAXIMILLIAN MCLAREN MANGUS (a/k/a “Max”) 34 Panama 10. MARIA ROJAS 36 Panama (a/k/a “Mary North” “Mary Isabel Rojas Mata”) 11. ARTURO GARCIA JIMENEZ 41 Panama 12. RIGOBERTO NOLAN (a/k/a “Rigoberto Nolan Forbes”) 53 Panama 13. JAVIER ESPINOSA (a/k/a “Javier Espinosa Jimenez”) 37 Panama 14. DAVID GORDON 75 Canada 15. JAMES FRANKLIN ACKER, III, 54 Moore, OK (a/k/a “Frank” “Frank The Bank”) 16. TERRY LEE CAMPBELL (a/k/a “Top Cat” “Gato”) 70 Lake Ozark, MO 17. RALPH GEORGE HERNANDEZ 73 Pleasanton, CA (a/k/a “Georgie”“Rico”) 18. DEREK EDWARD HEWITT (a/k/a “D”) 52 Altamonte Springs, FL 19. MICHAEL CASEY LAWHORN 47 Longwood, FL (a/k/a “Fat Mikey” “Big Mike”) 20. JOSEPH MICHAEL MCFADDEN 56 Longwood, FL (a/k/a “Joe” “Roll Tide”) 21. BRUCE LANDEN MIDDLEBROOK 44 Edmond, OK (a/k/a “Jose” “Jose C”) 22. GREGORY WILSON ROBERTS (a/k/a “Patchman”) 54 Gadsden, AL 23. CHRISTOPHER LEE TANNER 56 Sarasota, FL (a/k/a “CT” “Limo” “Tan” “Magic” ) 24. -
ASEBL Journal
January 2019 Volume 14, Issue 1 ASEBL Journal Association for the Study of EDITOR (Ethical Behavior)•(Evolutionary Biology) in Literature St. Francis College, Brooklyn Heights, N.Y. Gregory F. Tague, Ph.D. ▬ ~ GUEST CO-EDITOR ISSUE ON GREAT APE PERSONHOOD Christine Webb, Ph.D. ~ (To Navigate to Articles, Click on Author’s Last Name) EDITORIAL BOARD — Divya Bhatnagar, Ph.D. FROM THE EDITORS, pg. 2 Kristy Biolsi, Ph.D. ACADEMIC ESSAY Alison Dell, Ph.D. † Shawn Thompson, “Supporting Ape Rights: Tom Dolack, Ph.D Finding the Right Fit Between Science and the Law.” pg. 3 Wendy Galgan, Ph.D. COMMENTS Joe Keener, Ph.D. † Gary L. Shapiro, pg. 25 † Nicolas Delon, pg. 26 Eric Luttrell, Ph.D. † Elise Huchard, pg. 30 † Zipporah Weisberg, pg. 33 Riza Öztürk, Ph.D. † Carlo Alvaro, pg. 36 Eric Platt, Ph.D. † Peter Woodford, pg. 38 † Dustin Hellberg, pg. 41 Anja Müller-Wood, Ph.D. † Jennifer Vonk, pg. 43 † Edwin J.C. van Leeuwen and Lysanne Snijders, pg. 46 SCIENCE CONSULTANT † Leif Cocks, pg. 48 Kathleen A. Nolan, Ph.D. † RESPONSE to Comments by Shawn Thompson, pg. 48 EDITORIAL INTERN Angelica Schell † Contributor Biographies, pg. 54 Although this is an open-access journal where papers and articles are freely disseminated across the internet for personal or academic use, the rights of individual authors as well as those of the journal and its editors are none- theless asserted: no part of the journal can be used for commercial purposes whatsoever without the express written consent of the editor. Cite as: ASEBL Journal ASEBL Journal Copyright©2019 E-ISSN: 1944-401X [email protected] www.asebl.blogspot.com Member, Council of Editors of Learned Journals ASEBL Journal – Volume 14 Issue 1, January 2019 From the Editors Shawn Thompson is the first to admit that he is not a scientist, and his essay does not pretend to be a scientific paper. -
The Speculative Neuroscience of the Future Human Brain
Humanities 2013, 2, 209–252; doi:10.3390/h2020209 OPEN ACCESS humanities ISSN 2076-0787 www.mdpi.com/journal/humanities Article The Speculative Neuroscience of the Future Human Brain Robert A. Dielenberg Freelance Neuroscientist, 15 Parry Street, Cooks Hill, NSW, 2300, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-423-057-977 Received: 3 March 2013; in revised form: 23 April 2013 / Accepted: 27 April 2013 / Published: 21 May 2013 Abstract: The hallmark of our species is our ability to hybridize symbolic thinking with behavioral output. We began with the symmetrical hand axe around 1.7 mya and have progressed, slowly at first, then with greater rapidity, to producing increasingly more complex hybridized products. We now live in the age where our drive to hybridize has pushed us to the brink of a neuroscientific revolution, where for the first time we are in a position to willfully alter the brain and hence, our behavior and evolution. Nootropics, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and invasive brain mind interface (BMI) technology are allowing humans to treat previously inaccessible diseases as well as open up potential vistas for cognitive enhancement. In the future, the possibility exists for humans to hybridize with BMIs and mobile architectures. The notion of self is becoming increasingly extended. All of this to say: are we in control of our brains, or are they in control of us? Keywords: hybridization; BMI; tDCS; TMS; DBS; optogenetics; nootropic; radiotelepathy Introduction Newtonian systems aside, futurecasting is a risky enterprise at the best of times. -
Ethical Implications of Animal Personhood and the Role for Science
13 Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XXII, 2020, 1, pp. 13-32 ISBN: 1825-5167 ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF ANIMAL PERSONHOOD AND THE ROLE FOR SCIENCE KRISTIN ANDREWS Department of Philosophy York University (Canada) [email protected] ABSTRACT Personhood is a normative concept applied to beings who are due moral consideration given their agential and social properties. While the concept is a normative one, knowing how to appropriately apply the concept is a descriptive project, requiring guidance from scientists who can help to uncover whether or not a being has the relevant properties. If our current science attributes properties suffi- cient for personhood to a nonhuman animal, then we can directly conclude that the individual is morally considerable. However, from the mere fact that an animal is a person, we cannot draw any specific conclusions about appropriate treatment for captive animals. I will argue that from the prem- ise that an animal is a person we cannot directly conclude that the animal should be released from captivity, should not participate in research, should not participate in ecotourist schemes, or engage in other work; further descriptive premises would be needed. Such premises can only be supplied by experts who know the animal and the animal’s context. With respect to the descriptive project, animal ethicists need to defer to folk experts and scientists who are able to make informed judge- ments about what is best for a particular animal. This requires a collaborative relationship of trust between scientists and ethicists in order to best respect animal persons. KEYWORDS Personhood, animals, agency, animal persons, moral consideration. -
Journal of School Violence
Journal of School Violence eHAWORTH® Electronic Text is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. The Haworth Press, Inc. further disclaims all implied warranties including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability or of fitness for a particular purpose. The entire risk arising out of the use of the Electronic Text remains with you. In no event shall The Haworth Press, Inc., its authors, or anyone else involved in the creation, production, or delivery of this product be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of business profits, business interruption, loss of business information, or other pecuniary loss) arising out of the use of or inability to use the Electronic Text, even if The Haworth Press, Inc. has been advised of the possibility of such damages. EDITOR EDWIN R. GERLER, Jr., Professor, Counselor Education Program, College of Education, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC ASSOCIATE EDITORS PAMELA L. RILEY, Executive Director, National Association of Students Against Violence Everywhere (SAVE), Raleigh, NC JOANNE McDANIEL, Director, Center for the Prevention of School Violence, Raleigh, NC COLUMN EDITOR, E-SITES FOR SAFE SCHOOLS REBECCA R. REED, Ahlgren Associates, Raleigh, NC EDITORIAL BOARD DAVID P. ADAY, Jr., Department of Sociology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA RON AVI ASTOR, School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA RAMI BENBENISHTY, Paul Baerwald School of Social Work, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel ILENE R. BERSON, Department of Child and Family Studies, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL CATHERINE BLAYA-DEBARBIEUX, Universite Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux Cedex, France CHERYL L. -
Reagan's Victory
Reagan’s ictory How HeV Built His Winning Coalition By Robert G. Morrison Foreword by William J. Bennett Reagan’s Victory: How He Built His Winning Coalition By Robert G. Morrison 1 FOREWORD By William J. Bennett Ronald Reagan always called me on my birthday. Even after he had left the White House, he continued to call me on my birthday. He called all his Cabinet members and close asso- ciates on their birthdays. I’ve never known another man in public life who did that. I could tell that Alzheimer’s had laid its firm grip on his mind when those calls stopped coming. The President would have agreed with the sign borne by hundreds of pro-life marchers each January 22nd: “Doesn’t Everyone Deserve a Birth Day?” Reagan’s pro-life convic- tions were an integral part of who he was. All of us who served him knew that. Many of my colleagues in the Reagan administration were pro-choice. Reagan never treat- ed any of his team with less than full respect and full loyalty for that. But as for the Reagan administration, it was a pro-life administration. I was the second choice of Reagan’s to head the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH). It was my first appointment in a Republican administration. I was a Democrat. Reagan had chosen me after a well-known Southern historian and literary critic hurt his candidacy by criticizing Abraham Lincoln. My appointment became controversial within the Reagan ranks because the Gipper was highly popular in the South, where residual animosities toward Lincoln could still be found. -
Final Report on the Grasp-Ian Redmond Conservation Award
FINAL REPORT ON THE GRASP-IAN REDMOND CONSERVATION AWARD Grant about “increasing local awareness about the importance of preserving chimpanzees of the Gishwati-Mukura National Park, Rwanda”. Supported by February 2020 FINAL REPORT ON THE GRANT IMPLEMENTATION 1. Introduction In 2019 January, Forest of Hope Association (FHA) started the implementation of the GRASP-Ian Redmond Conservation Award, a grant co-funded by Remembering Great Apes and Born Free Foundation (BFF). The award was used to increase local awareness about the importance of Gishwati chimpanzees. The main goal of this project was to ensure extensive awareness among local community about the importance of preserving the Gishwati chimpanzees and the best practices to reduce transmissible diseases between people, chimpanzees and livestock. The project was implemented around Gishwati forest the northern part of Gishwati-Mukura National Park (GMNP). This park is home for a number of threatened primate species including eastern chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes schweinfurthii, listed as endangered species on the IUCN Red List); golden monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis kandti, listed as endangered); mountain monkeys (Cercopithecus l’hoesti, listed as vulnerable); a large number of plant species and more than 200 bird species. The project was implemented during 12 months. During the project start FHA was visited by Margot Raggett, the founder of Remembering Great Apes and Ian Redmond. These visits were done just to meet the FHA team, visit the Gishwati forest, hear its conservation story, the work being done, and the contribution of this project on this new park conservation. Fig 1: Margot Raggett during her visit in the Fig 2: Ian Redmond with the Vice Mayor of Gishwati forest Rutsiro district and Ms. -
Chapter Sampler
Chapter Sampler Renée Ahdieh Max Brooks The Beautiful Devolution Page 2 Page 25 Kat Cho Holly Jackson Wicked Fox A Good Girl’s Guide to Murder Page 37 Page 68 Zack Jordan Natalie Mae The Last Human The Kinder Poison Page 92 Page 119 Silvia Moreno-Garcia Erin Morgenstern Mexican Gothic The Starless Sea Page 148 Page 174 Naomi Novik Stephanie Perkins A Deadly Education There’s Someone Inside Page 188 Your House Page 234 Tochi Onyebuchi Emily Skrutskie War Girls Bonds of Brass Page 258 Page 281 Sabaa Tahir Charles Yu An Ember in the Ashes Interior Chinatown Page 311 Page 360 The Beautiful Renée Ahdieh Click here to learn more about this book! RENé E AHDIEH G. P. PUTNAM’S SONS G. P. Putnam’s Sons an imprint of Penguin Random House LLC, New York Copyright © 2019 by Renée Ahdieh. Penguin supports copyright. Copyright fuels creativity, encourages diverse voices, promotes free speech, and creates a vibrant culture. Thank you for buying an authorized edition of this book and for complying with copyright laws by not reproducing, scanning, or distributing any part of it in any form without permission. You are supporting writers and allowing Penguin to continue to publish books for every reader. G. P. Putnam’s Sons is a registered trademark of Penguin Random House LLC. Visit us online at penguinrandomhouse.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available upon request. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN 9781524738174 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 Design by Theresa Evangelista. Text set in Warnock Pro. -
98.6: a Creative Commonality
CONTENT 1 - 2 exibition statement 3 - 18 about the chimpanzees and orangutans 19 resources 20 educational activity 21-22 behind the scenes 23 installation images 24 walkthrough video / flickr page 25-27 works in show 28 thank you EXHIBITION STATEMENT Humans and chimpanzees share 98.6% of the same DNA. Both species have forward-facing eyes, opposing thumbs that accompany grasping fingers, and the ability to walk upright. Far greater than just the physical similarities, both species have large brains capable of exhibiting great intelligence as well as an incredible emotional range. Chimpanzees form tight social bonds, especially between mothers and children, create tools to assist with eating and express joy by hugging and kissing one another. Over 1,000,000 chimpanzees roamed the tropical rain forests of Africa just a century ago. Now listed as endangered, less than 300,000 exist in the wild because of poaching, the illegal pet trade and habitat loss due to human encroachment. Often, chimpanzees are killed, leaving orphans that are traded and sold around the world. Thanks to accredited zoos and sanctuaries across the globe, strong conservation efforts and programs exist to protect and manage populations of many species of the animal kingdom, including the great apes - the chimpanzee, gorilla, orangutan and bonobo. In the United States, institutions such as the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) and the Species Survival Plan (SSP) work together across the nation in a cooperative effort to promote population growth and ensure the utmost care and conditions for all species. Included in the daily programs for many species is what’s commonly known as “enrichment”–– an activity created and employed to stimulate and pose a challenge, such as hiding food and treats throughout an enclosure that requires a search for food, sometimes with a problem-solving component. -
A L Repo R T 2015
T R L REPO A ANNU 2015 BORNEO ORANGUTAN SURVIVBOSAL Foundation FOUND - Annual ReportATION 2015 1 VISION &MISSION BOS FOUNDATION VISION “To achieve Bornean orangutan and habitat conservation in collaboration with local stakeholders.” BOS FOUNDATION MISSION 1. Accelerate the release of Bornean orangutans from ex-situ to in-situ locations 2. Encourage the protection of Bornean orangutans and their habitat 3. Increase the empowerment of communities surrounding orangutan habitat 4. Support research and education activities for the conservation of Bornean orangutans and their habitat 5. Promote the participation of and partnership with all stakeholders 6. Strengthen institutional capacity 2 BOS Foundation - Annual Report 2015 BOS Foundation - Annual Report 2015 3 PROGRAMS AND STRATEGIC ACTIVITIES BOS FOUNDATION STRATEGIC ACTIVITIES • Rescue, rehabilitation and reintroduction of orangutans and other protected species (sun bears), obtaining governmental permissions and approvals for reintroduction sites, translocation activities and post-release and translocation monitoring • Orangutan habitat conservation, comprising management of wild orangutan habitat in the Mawas Area, Central Kalimantan, management of translocation and reintroduction sites, management of orangutan and sun bear conservation areas and facilitation of Best Management Practices (BMP) of orangutan habitat within other land-uses • Involvement and empowerment of local communities, enhanced communication and publications, cooperation with stakeholders, conservation related research -
Hand Pressures During Arboreal Locomotion in Captive Bonobos (Pan Paniscus) Diana S
© 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2018) 221, jeb170910. doi:10.1242/jeb.170910 RESEARCH ARTICLE Hand pressures during arboreal locomotion in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus) Diana S. Samuel1, Sandra Nauwelaerts2,3, Jeroen M. G. Stevens3,4 and Tracy L. Kivell1,5,* ABSTRACT of both manipulation and locomotion. Although there has been much Evolution of the human hand has undergone a transition from use research into the potential changes in manipulative abilities during locomotion to use primarily for manipulation. Previous throughout human evolution, from both morphological (e.g. comparative morphological and biomechanical studies have Napier, 1955; Marzke, 1997; Marzke et al., 1999; Skinner et al., focused on potential changes in manipulative abilities during 2015) and biomechanical (e.g. Marzke et al., 1998; Rolian et al., human hand evolution, but few have focused on functional signals 2011; Williams et al., 2012; Key and Dunmore, 2014) perspectives, for arboreal locomotion. Here, we provide this comparative context comparatively little research has been done that may help us infer though the first analysis of hand loading in captive bonobos during how our ancestors may have used their hands for arboreal arboreal locomotion. We quantify pressure experienced by the locomotion, particularly climbing and suspension. Many fossil fingers, palm and thumb in bonobos during vertical locomotion, hominins show features of the hand (e.g. curved fingers) and upper suspension and arboreal knuckle-walking. The results show that limb (e.g. superiorly oriented shoulder joint) (e.g. Stern, 2000; pressure experienced by the fingers is significantly higher during Larson, 2007; Churchill et al., 2013; Kivell et al., 2011, 2015; Kivell, knuckle-walking compared with similar pressures experienced by the 2015) that suggest arboreal locomotion may still have been an fingers and palm during suspensory and vertical locomotion.