Directed Self-Assembly of Block Copolymer, No1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Directed Self-Assembly of Block Copolymer, No1 University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Protocols and Reports Browse by Type 8-1-2016 Directed Self-Assembly of Block Copolymer, No1 Hiromichi Yamamoto Singh Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/scn_protocols Part of the Biochemical and Biomolecular Engineering Commons, Biological and Chemical Physics Commons, Membrane Science Commons, Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Commons, Other Chemistry Commons, Physical Chemistry Commons, Polymer and Organic Materials Commons, Polymer Chemistry Commons, and the Polymer Science Commons Yamamoto, Hiromichi, "Directed Self-Assembly of Block Copolymer, No1", Protocols and Reports. Paper 27. https://repository.upenn.edu/scn_protocols/27 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/scn_protocols/27 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Directed Self-Assembly of Block Copolymer, No1 Abstract The PS-rich and neutral PS-b-PMMA block copolymer (BCP) films were spin coated on the neutral random copolymer hydroxyl-terminated PS-r-PMMA layers grafted on the native oxide and 50 nm thick PECVD amorphous silicon oxide layers. Relationship between the grafting density of BCP and surface density of hydroxyl moiety on silicon oxide is discussed. Furthermore, optimization of annealing BCP films is reported, and wetted and de-wetted BCP films are shown in optical microscope images. In addition, finger print and nanopore structures of BCP films are also indicated in SEM images. Keywords directed self-assembly, block-copolymer, grafting, hydroxylated silicon oxide Disciplines Biochemical and Biomolecular Engineering | Biological and Chemical Physics | Membrane Science | Nanoscience and Nanotechnology | Other Chemistry | Physical Chemistry | Polymer and Organic Materials | Polymer Chemistry | Polymer Science Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. This technical report is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/scn_protocols/27 Document No: Technical Report Revision: Directed Self-Assembly of Author: Hiromichi Yamamoto Block Copolymer, No1 1. Introduction Directed self-assembly of block copolymer (BCP) is considered as one of the most promising advanced lithography, 1 and can make nanometer scale patterns on the 6-inch diameter substrate at the same time without expensive cost, using the self-assembly of BCP and guide pattern created by a conventional lithography tool. Up to now, sub-10 nm patterns of high-χ BCP ( χ: Flory-Huggins interaction parameter) have been reported. 2,3 The goal of this project is to make this technique available at Quattrone Nanofabrication Facility (QNF). Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of multi-layer structure of block copolymer on random copolymer grafted on the Si substrate. In actual devices, a guide pattern is added to the multi-layer structure. 4 The morphology of BCP is controlled by chemical affinity of the underlying random copolymer grafted (or immobilized) on the substrate and by the thickness of BCP film. 5 This report describes a graft (or immobilization) of the random copolymer on the Si substrate and optimization of commensurability between the film thickness of BCP and the polymer domain spacing (or Lamellar spacing). Figure 1. Schematic diagram of multi-layer structure of block copolymer on random copolymer grafted on the Si substrate. The morphology of the block copolymer is controlled by the chemical affinity with the underlying film and by the film thickness. 1 M. C. Smayling, Proc. SPIE, 9777 , 977702 (2016). 2 N. Kihara et al., J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS 14 , 023502 (2015). 3 W. J. Durand et al., J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 53 , 344–352 (2015). 4 C. Liu et al., Macromolecules 44 , 1876 (2011). 5 J. N. L. Albert and T. H. Epps, Mater. Today, 13 , 24 (2010). Page 1 Technical Report Directed Self-Assembly of Block Copolymer, No1 2. Experimental Section A. Materials BCP poly(styrene-block -methyl methacrylate) (PS-b-PMMA) with the average molecular weight Mn of poly-styrene = 6 15000, Mn of poly-methyl methacrylate = 15000, expressed by 15k-b-15k, and PDI ≤ 1.2 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Furthermore, two kinds of BCP PS-b-PMMA (poly-methyl methacrylate rich in syndiotactic contents 6 > 78 or 80 %) with M n of 33k-b-33k and 46k-b-21k and PDI = 1.09 were purchased from Polymer Source. The three BCPs were used as received. Hereafter, the BCPs with Mn of 15k-b-15k and 33k-b-33k are referred to as “neutral PS(15k)-b-PMMA(15k)” and “neutral PS(33k)-b-PMMA(33k)”, respectively, or simply “neutral PS-b-PMMA”, where the “neutral” means 50 to 50 mol%, while the BCP with Mn of 46k-b-21k is referred to as “PS-rich PS-b-PMMA”. Hydroxyl-terminated random copolymer poly(styrene-r-methyl methacrylate), α-hydroxyl-ω-tempo moiety 6 terminated, with Mn = 5400 (PS content 60 mol%) and PDI = 1.40 was also purchased from Polymer Source, and used as received. Hereafter, the random copolymer is referred to as “brush-OH” or ”PS-r-PMMA-OH”. The brush- OH with PS content of 60 mol% is considered to be “neutral”. A CMOS grade toluene (trace impurity level, 10-200 ppb) was purchased from J. T. Baker, and used as received. B. Deposition of 50 nm thick silicon oxide film A (100) Si wafer was sonicated in acetone and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) for 5 min each, and then dried using a nitrogen gun. A 50 nm thick amorphous silicon oxide was deposited on the Si wafer, using Oxford Plasma Lab 100 (Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD)). C. Grafting the brush-OH film on the hydroxylated silicon oxide surface on Si wafer The 1.2-1.5 nm thick native oxide and the 50 nm thick silicon oxide films were hydroxylated, respectively, by 7 8 treatment of nitric acid (70 wt%) or piranha solution at 80 °C for 30-40 min. O2 plasma treatment was not carried out for the hydroxylation, due to possible cross-contamination in the tool frequently used in QNF. The samples hydroxylated were sonicated in de-ionized (DI) water for 2 min, and then dried using nitrogen gun. Furthermore, the samples were dehydrated at ~150 °C for 5 min in a vacuum oven. A ~20 nm thick brush-OH film was spin coated at 4000 rpm on the Si substrate with and without the 50 nm thick silicon oxide film on its surface from the 0.9 wt% toluene solution, and grafted on the hydroxylated silicon oxide by annealing itself in the oven filled with N 2 or in vacuum. The annealing time and temperature are shown later. After annealing, the unreacted brush-OH polymer was removed by repeated 30 min sonication in toluene (3 times). D. Film preparation of BCPs Various thick neutral and PS-rich PS-b-PMMA films were spin coated at various spin speeds on the brush layers grafted on the Si substrates from 1.2 wt% PS(15k)-b-PMMA(15k), 1.7 wt% PS(33k)-b-PMMA(33k), and 1.7 wt% 6 ∑ Polydispersity Index = M w/M n, where M w is the weight average molecular mass and given by the equation, M w = ; M n is the number average molecular mass, and given by the equation, Mn = ; Ni is the number of molecules of molecular mass Mi. 7 A 3:1 (v/v) mixture of sulfuric acid (H 2SO 4, 95-98 wt%) and hydrogen peroxide (H 2O2, 30 wt%). 8 S. Guhathakurta and A. Subramanian, J. Electrochem. Soc. 154 , P136 (2007). Document No.: Revision: Author: url: Page 2 Technical Report Directed Self-Assembly of Block Copolymer, No1 PS(46k)-b-PMMA(21k) solutions in toluene. The BCP films were annealed at 190-250 °C for 4-72 hours in the oven filled with N 2, as shown later. E. Measurements The BCP films for the thickness measurements were separately spin coated on blank Si wafers. Film thicknesses of silicon oxide, BCP, and brush layer were determined, respectively, using Woollam VASE ellipsometer. Simulation model was Cauchy or SiO 2 models. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were measured through a copper (Cu) grid to prevent the polymer films from charging, using JOEL JSM-7500F. The PMMA portion in the BCP films was removed by O 2 plasma treatment for SEM measurements. 3. Results and Discussion 3-1. Relationship between grafting density of BCP and surface density of hydroxyl moiety on silicon oxide Table 1 indicates the hydroxylation and annealing conditions and thicknesses of brush layers grafted on the hydroxylated surfaces of the native oxide and 50 nm thick silicon oxide. The thickness of brush layer grafted on the native oxide was ~3.5 nm even though the samples were annealed for 48 hours, as shown in Table 1. On the other hand, the thicknesses of brush layers grafted on the 50 nm thick silicon oxide hydroxylated with nitric acid and piranha solution were 3.8 ± 0.7 and 4.6 ± 0.4 nm, respectively, for 4 hour annealing, whereas that was 5.5 ± 1.6 nm for 20-24 hour annealing. Table 1. The hydroxylation and annealing conditions, and average thicknesses and grafting densities σ of brush layers grafted on the hydroxylated surfaces of the native oxide and 50 nm thick silicon oxide. σ Hydroxylation of silicon oxide surfaces Annealing in an oven Thickness (nm) of brush layer (Chain/nm 2) Temperature Time Temperature Time solution gas Native oxide 50 nm thick SiO2 (°C) (Hour) (°C) (Hour) HNO3/piranha 80 30-40 190-250 4 vac/N2 3.3 ± 0.3 --- 0.41 HNO3/piranha 80 30 190 20-48 N2 3.6 ± 0.4 --- 0.44 HNO3 80 30 190 4 vac/N2 --- 3.8 ± 0.7 0.47 piranha 80 30 190 4 vac/N2 --- 4.6 ± 0.4 0.57 HNO3 80 30 190 20-24 N2 --- 5.5 ± 1.6 0.68 The surface coverage Γ (mg/m 2) is given by the following equation:9 Γ = h ρ (1) where h is the layer thickness (nm), and ρ is density (g/cm 3) of adsorbed molecule.
Recommended publications
  • Chemical Compatibility of Fused Filament Fabrication-Based 3-D
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Archive Ouverte en Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication Chemical compatibility of fused filament fabrication-based 3-D printed components with solutions commonly used in semiconductor wet processing Ismo T.S Heikkinen, Christoffer Kauppinen, Zhengjun Liu, Sanja Asikainen, Steven Spoljaric, Jukka Seppälä, Hele Savin, Joshua Pearce To cite this version: Ismo T.S Heikkinen, Christoffer Kauppinen, Zhengjun Liu, Sanja Asikainen, Steven Spoljaric, etal.. Chemical compatibility of fused filament fabrication-based 3-D printed components with solutions commonly used in semiconductor wet processing. Additive Manufacturing, Elsevier, 2018, 23, pp.99- 107. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.07.015. hal-02111366 HAL Id: hal-02111366 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02111366 Submitted on 26 Apr 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Preprint: Ismo T. S. Heikkinen, Christoffer Kauppinen, Zhengjun Liu, Sanja M. Asikainen, Steven Spoljaric, Jukka V. Seppälä, Hele Savin, and Joshua M. Pearce. Chemical Compatibility of Fused Filament Fabrication -based 3-D Printed Components with Solutions Commonly Used in Semiconductor Wet Processing. Additive Manufacturing.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Chemical Waste Management Guidelines
    LABORATORY CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES Revision: July, 2018 EHRS Environmental Health & Radiation Safety 3160 Chestnut Street, Suite 400 Philadelphia, PA 19104-6287 Contents 1. Overview ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2. When is Hazardous Waste Regulated? .............................................................................................. 3 3. What is Hazardous Waste? ................................................................................................................. 3 4. Hazardous chemical waste determination ......................................................................................... 5 5. Essential rules for managing hazardous chemical materials .............................................................. 5 5.1 Waste minimization ..................................................................................................................... 5 5.2 Storing waste in the lab (Satellite Accumulation) ...................................................................... 6 5.3 Container management in SAA’s ................................................................................................ 7 5.4 Waste containers ......................................................................................................................... 7 5.4.1 Properly labeling waste containers ...................................................................................... 7 5.4.2
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Cleaning Methods for Multilayer Diffraction Gratings
    EVALUATION OF CLEANING METHODS FOR MULTILAYER DIFFRACTION GRATINGS Evaluation of Cleaning Methods for Multilayer Diffraction Gratings Introduction monly used cleaning processes for the removal of organics Multilayer dielectric (MLD) diffraction gratings are essential (i.e., residual resist) from a surface and is usually used at a high components for the OMEGA EP short-pulse, high-energy temperature.1,2 Although Piranha solution is highly effective in laser system, so they must have both high optical-diffraction removing organic contamination, it does not remove all inorganic efficiency and high laser-damage threshold. The cleanliness of contaminants. Piranha solution must be prepared immediately optical surfaces intended to be deployed in high-peak-power before use, has a very limited shelf life, and cannot be stored in laser systems is of paramount importance, and the fabrication normal closed containers due to an explosive pressure buildup of these MLD gratings involves processes that utilize a wide caused by the gradual loss of hydrogen peroxide gas. variety of both organic materials (photoresists, photoresist solvents, and photoresist developers) and inorganic materi- Piranha + SC-1 Process: The cleaning method that is com- als (metals and oxides of various cationic elements) that may monly used to remove inorganic contamination after Piranha remain behind either on the surfaces or in the grooves of the clean (described above) is SC-1 (Standard Clean 1) coupled MLD structure after processing. Because a substantial number with megasonics (high-frequency ultrasonic energy).1,3 The of these materials can have significant optical absorbance, the SC-1 solution of ammonia hydroxide, hydrogen peroxide, incomplete removal of these residues puts the MLD gratings and DI water is also cable of removing additional organic at an increased risk of experiencing catastrophic laser-induced contaminants.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxidation of N-Doped Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes and Formation of Discontinuous Spiraled Carbon Nanoribbons Aman Preet Kaur University of Kentucky, [email protected]
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Chemistry Faculty Publications Chemistry 6-7-2018 Oxidation of N-Doped Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes and Formation of Discontinuous Spiraled Carbon Nanoribbons Aman Preet Kaur University of Kentucky, [email protected] Mark S. Meier University of Kentucky, [email protected] Rodney Andrews University of Kentucky, [email protected] Dali Qian University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits oy u. Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/chemistry_facpub Part of the Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Commons, and the Organic Chemistry Commons Repository Citation Kaur, Aman Preet; Meier, Mark S.; Andrews, Rodney; and Qian, Dali, "Oxidation of N-Doped Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes and Formation of Discontinuous Spiraled Carbon Nanoribbons" (2018). Chemistry Faculty Publications. 124. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/chemistry_facpub/124 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Chemistry at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chemistry Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Oxidation of N-Doped Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes and Formation of Discontinuous Spiraled Carbon Nanoribbons Notes/Citation Information Published in Arkivoc, v. 2018, part iv, p. 257 - 275. © ARKAT USA, Inc Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc/4.0/. Material from ARKIVOC may be stored and used electronically free of charge by any individual or organization but resale of electronically stored material requires permission of the Publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Piranha Solution Safety Guidelines
    PIRANHA SOLUTION SAFETY GUIDELINES The Piranha solution is used in etching processes to remove organic residues from substrates. Two different solutions can be used. The most common is the acid Piranha which consists of a 3:1 mixture of concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4) with 30% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Also used is the base Piranha which is a 3:1 mixture of ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) with 30% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Both are equally dangerous when hot, although the reaction in the acid Piranha is self-starting, whereas the base piranha must be heated to 60°C before the reaction takes off. Anyone who works in laboratories containing Piranha solution should familiarize themselves with its SDS and a clear Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) should be established. Therefore, careful precaution should always be taken when handling this solution. This document discusses the properties, health and safety hazards, how to properly handle and store a Piranha solution. Also included are emergency procedures for dealing with accidental Piranha solution contact, including first aid treatment information. WARNING: Piranha solutions are VERY DANGEROUS! In addition to being a corrosive liquid and strong oxidizer, there are many things which will cause the reaction to accelerate out of control ranging from foaming out of its bin to an explosion with a huge shock wave with possible acid (or base)-gown shredding glass sharps. Piranhas burn (oxidize) organic compounds. If you provide sufficient fuel for them (i.e. photoresist, IPA), they will generate
    [Show full text]
  • Thiol-Ene Immobilisation of Carbohydrates Onto Glass Slides As
    Biomaterials Science Thiol -ene Immobilisation of Carbohydrates onto Glass Slides as a Simple Alternative to Gold-Thiol Monolayers, Amines or Lipid Binding Journal: Biomaterials Science Manuscript ID: BM-ART-05-2014-000176.R2 Article Type: Paper Date Submitted by the Author: 11-Sep-2014 Complete List of Authors: Biggs, Caroline; University of Warwick, Chemistry Edmondson, Steve; University of Manchester, Gibson, Matthew; University of Warwick, Chemistry Page 1 of 7 Biomaterials Science Journal Name RSC Publishing ARTICLE Thiol-ene Immobilisation of Carbohydrates onto Glass Slides as a Simple Alternative to Gold-Thiol Cite this: DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x Monolayers, Amines or Lipid Binding Caroline I. Biggs, a Steve Edmondson,b and Matthew I. Gibson a,c Received 00th January 2012, Accepted 00th January 2012 Carbohydrate arrays are a vital tool in studying infection, probing the mechanisms of bacterial, viral and toxin adhesion and the development of new treatments, by mimicking the structure of the glycocalyx. DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x Current methods rely on the formation of monolayers of carbohydrates that have been chemically www.rsc.org/ modified with a linker to enable interaction with a functionalised surface. This includes amines, biotin, lipids or thiols. Thiol-addition to gold to form self-assembled monolayers is perhaps the simplest method for immobilisation as thiolated glycans are readily accessible from reducing carbohydrates in a single step, but are limited to gold surfaces. Here we have developed a quick and versatile methodology which enables the use of thiolated carbohydrates to be immobilised as monolayers directly onto acrylate- functional glass slides via a ‘thiol-ene’/Michael-type reaction.
    [Show full text]
  • I ELECTRON INTERACTIONS in CARBON NANOMATERIALS By
    ELECTRON INTERACTIONS IN CARBON NANOMATERIALS by Brian Andrew Barth B.S. Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, 2009 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science University of Pittsburgh 2012 i UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This thesis was presented by Brian Andrew Barth It was defended on April 11, 2012 and approved by Dr. Geoffrey Hutchison, Assistant Professor, Chemistry Dr. Renã A. S. Robinson, Assistant Professor, Chemistry Thesis Director: Dr. Alexander Star, Associate Professor, Chemistry ii Copyright © by Brian Barth 2012 iii ELECTRON INTERACTIONS IN CARBON NANOTUBES Brian Barth, M.S. University of Pittsburgh, 2012 The following research reflects two areas of interest in carbon nanomaterials: (1) enzymatic oxidation and (2) photocatalytic applications. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) is known to catalyze oxidation of carbon nanomaterials. Here, we closely examine the kinetics of enzymatic oxidation of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) using HRP. We show that CNTs oxidized by harsh acid treatment become shorter, more defective, and lose their specific absorption bands and fluorescent signals. After treatment with HRP and H2O2, these oxidized CNTs show a decrease in average CNT length, a decrease in defective area, and return of characteristic absorption bands and fluorescence. We observed that CNTs chemically oxidized using weaker oxidation treatment were shortened, slightly more defective than before acid treatment, did not lose their characteristic absorption bands, but did lose fluorescence. After treatment with HRP and H2O2 there was a decrease in length, a decrease in defective area, no observed change in absorption spectra bands and fluorescent signal did not return.
    [Show full text]
  • Thin Film Deposition of Conducting Polymers and Carbon Allotropes
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Thin Film Deposition of Conducting Polymers and Carbon Allotropes via Interfacial Solution Processing and Evaporative Vapor Phase Polymerization A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry By Julio Marcelo D'Arcy 2012 © Copyright by Julio Marcelo D'Arcy 2012 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Thin Film Deposition of Conducting Polymers and Carbon Allotropes via Interfacial Solution Processing and Evaporative Vapor Phase Polymerization By Julio Marcelo D'Arcy Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry University of California, Los Angeles, 2012 Professor Richard B. Kaner, Chair A new solution processing technique is developed for depositing continuously conductive transparent thin films comprised of conducting polymer nanostructures. The deposition mechanism is driven by interfacial surface tension gradients leading to rapid directional fluid flow known as the Marangoni effect. This technique is a universal solution to thin film deposition for coating any type of substrate at ambient conditions within seconds. The versatility of this method of deposition is further explored utilizing Pickering emulsions of carbon allotropes to produce transparent conductive coatings. Film morphology and electrical properties of carbon nanotubes and sheets of both graphite oxide and chemically converted graphene are ii controlled by solution processing at the liquid/liquid interface. This dissertation reports on harnessing directional fluid flow to afford a simple and scalable thin film deposition technique for both organic and inorganic nanostructured semiconductors. Substrate directed thin film deposition is engineered by forming a liquid-liquid interface on the surface of a target substrate and is accomplished by matching the surface energy of a substrate to the surface tension of solvents utilized for emulsifying solid nanostructures.
    [Show full text]
  • Techniques and Considerations in the Microfabrication of Parylene C Microelectromechanical Systems
    micromachines Review Techniques and Considerations in the Microfabrication of Parylene C Microelectromechanical Systems Jessica Ortigoza-Diaz 1, Kee Scholten 1 ID , Christopher Larson 1 ID , Angelica Cobo 1, Trevor Hudson 1, James Yoo 1 ID , Alex Baldwin 1 ID , Ahuva Weltman Hirschberg 1 and Ellis Meng 1,2,* 1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA; [email protected] (J.O.-D.); [email protected] (K.S.); [email protected] (C.L.); [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (T.H.); [email protected] (J.Y.); [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (A.W.H.) 2 Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-213-740-6952 Received: 31 July 2018; Accepted: 18 August 2018; Published: 22 August 2018 Abstract: Parylene C is a promising material for constructing flexible, biocompatible and corrosion- resistant microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) devices. Historically, Parylene C has been employed as an encapsulation material for medical implants, such as stents and pacemakers, due to its strong barrier properties and biocompatibility. In the past few decades, the adaptation of planar microfabrication processes to thin film Parylene C has encouraged its use as an insulator, structural and substrate material for MEMS and other microelectronic devices. However, Parylene C presents unique challenges during microfabrication and during use with liquids, especially for flexible, thin film electronic devices. In particular, the flexibility and low thermal budget of Parylene C require modification of the fabrication techniques inherited from silicon MEMS, and poor adhesion at Parylene-Parylene and Parylene-metal interfaces causes device failure under prolonged use in wet environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazardous Waste Disposal Guide
    [Type text] Northwestern University Office for Research Safety Hazardous Waste Management Program http://www.research.northwestern.edu/ors/ Hazardous Waste Disposal Guide Revised: Sep 2015, May 2015 NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY – EMERGENCY CONTACT LIST EMERGENCY COORDINATORS Primary Emergency Coordinator Office: (847) 491-5581 Cell: (603) 359-0782 Michael Blayney, Ph.D. - ORS Director 24-hour pager: (312) 250-1850 Home: (847) 859-6079 First Alternate Emergency Coordinator Office: (847) 491-7380 Cell: (847) 436-3704 Markus Schaufele - ORS Evanston Director 24-hour pager: (312) 661-3846 Home: (847) 296-9383 Alternate Emergency Coordinator Office: (312) 503-1932 Cell: (708) 341-4025 Andrea Hall, Ph.D. – ORS Chicago Director 24-hour pager: (312) 250-0467 Home: (815) 886-5691 INTERNAL RESPONSE CONTACTS Northwestern University Police1 911 or 456 ORS Office – Evanston Campus (847) 491-5581 ORS Office – Chicago Campus (312) 503-8300 ORS Emergency Pager System – All contacts (312) 661-3227 EXTERNAL RESPONSE CONTACTS ( City/State/Federal Agencies) Evanston Fire Department / LEPC (847) 448-4311 Evanston Police Department (847) 866-5000 Chicago Fire Department (312) 745-3705 Chicago Police Department (312) 744-4000 Chicago LEPC (Mr. William Schatz - Dept. of Envir.) (312) 746-6430 LOCAL HOSPITAL Northwestern Memorial Hospital (Chicago) (312) 926-2000 Northshore University Health System (Evanston) (847) 570-2000 STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES Metropolitan Water Reclamation District (MWRD) (312) 787-3575 (Emergency) (312) 751-5600 (Non-emergency) Chicago Department
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry of Graphene Electronic Fabrication A
    INQUIRY OF GRAPHENE ELECTRONIC FABRICATION A Thesis presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Science in Electric Engineering by John Rausch Greene August 2016 © 2016 John Rausch Greene ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: Inquiry of Graphene Electronic Fabrication AUTHOR: John Rausch Greene DATE SUBMITTED: August 2016 COMMITTEE CHAIR: David Braun, Ph.D. Professor of Electrical Engineering COMMITTEE MEMBER: Hans Mayer, Ph.D. Lecturer of Mechanical Engineering COMMITTEE MEMBER: Malcolm Keif, Ph.D. Professor of Graphic Communications COMMITTEE MEMBER: Colleen Marlow, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Physics iii ABSTRACT Inquiry of Graphene Electronic Fabrication John Rausch Greene Graphene electronics represent a developing field where many material properties and devices characteristics are still unknown. Researching several possible fabrication processes creates a fabrication process using resources found at Cal Poly a local industry sponsor. The project attempts to produce a graphene network in the shape of a fractal Sierpinski carpet. The fractal geometry proves that PDMS microfluidic channels produce the fine feature dimensions desired during graphene oxide deposit. Thermal reduction then reduces the graphene oxide into a purified state of graphene. Issues arise during thermal reduction because of excessive oxygen content in the furnace. The excess oxygen results in devices burning and additional oxidation of the gate contacts that prevents good electrical contact to the gates. Zero bias testing shows that the graphene oxide resistance decreases after thermal reduction, proving that thermal reduction of the devices occurs. Testing confirms a fabrication process producing graphene electronics; however, revision of processing steps, especially thermal reduction, should greatly improve the yield and functionality of the devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Bartlett Group
    Bartlett Group University of Michigan Department of Chemistry 930 N. University Avenue Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1055 Standard Operating Procedures Original Version (1.0) Approved: February 3, 2012 Version 1.5 Approved: February 13, 2017 Table of Contents USE OF THE BASE and ACID BATHS, GENERAL HANDLING OF ACIDS AND BASES ....... 2 WORKING WITH STRONG OXIDANTS ...................................................................................... 6 WORKING WITH AQUA REGIA ................................................................................................ 11 WORKING WITH PIRANHA CLEANING SOLUTION ............................................................... 13 USING THE SCHLENK LINE ..................................................................................................... 16 USING THE GLOVEBOX ........................................................................................................... 22 USING THE SOLVENT PURIFICATION SYSTEM .................................................................... 26 USING HYDROTHERMAL REACTION VESSELS .................................................................... 28 USING THE CENTRIFUGE AND VACUUM OVEN ................................................................... 30 USING COMPRESSED GAS CYLINDERS ............................................................................... 33 USING THE TUBE FURNACE ................................................................................................... 38 GLASS CUTTING AND USING FLUORINATED TIN OXIDE ...................................................
    [Show full text]