DOCSLIB.ORG

The Latest Innovations in Military Equipment and Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Latest Innovations in Military Equipment and Systems SHOW REPORTMODERN DAY MARINE EXPO 2017 |BY ROBERT BRUCE USMC/Corporal Samantha Braun In his Wednesday morning keynote address to an overflow crowd in the spacious Briefing Center, General Robert Neller, Commandant of the Marine Corps, provides his perspective on “Littoral Operations in a Contested Environment,” the recently developed official doctrine for near-future amphibious warfare. Briefing slides for his presentation and those of other presenters are clearly visible to all on twin giant screens. https://marine- corpsconceptsandprograms.com/concepts/littoral-operations-contested-environment ow in his third year as Commandant with a third visit to Modern Day Marine (MDM), four-star General Neller delivered his key- note address, “Littoral Operations in a Contested Environment,” The Latest Nto an overflow crowd on Wednesday in the cavernous Briefing Center tent at the 2017 Modern Day Marine Expo. With “littoral” defined as that portion of the world’s land masses adja- cent to the ocean within direct control of and vulnerable to the striking power of sea-based forces, Neller emphasized that the Navy and Marine Innovations Corps will have to “fight to get to the fight,” facing adversaries with long- range precision weapon capabilities. (Editor’s Note: The official MCO document on which Commandant Neller’s presentation was based is available for download at https:// marinecorpsconceptsandprograms.com/concepts/littoral-opera- in Military tions-contested-environment) Much More Than a “Trade Show” Commandant Neller’s hard-hitting predictions add tremendous weight to the importance of MDM Expos as essential, multifaceted resources for the Marine Corps’ warfighters at all levels and for the Equipment defense industry to anticipate and offer solutions for both present and future needs. These needs include everything from hydration to hyper- sonic weaponry, from biscuits and boots to battlefield digitizing and and Systems much, much more. Small Arms Review Vol. 22, No. 3 42 MARCH 2018 USMC/Lance Corporal Sarah Petrock October 2016, MCB Twentynine Palms, California. Live-fire training with a suppressed M4 carbine in preparation for a deployment. As outlined in the presentation by Colonel Michael Manning, Portfolio Manager for SYSCOM’s Ground Combat Element Systems, small arms suppressors and improved fire control are two of the Marine Corps’ top priorities for near-term purchase and fielding. marcorsyscom.marines.mil “Our adversaries are not going to let us get to the fight uncontested. We are going to have to fire away across the ocean, under the ocean and in the air. We have to be able to prepare to implement offensive and defen- sive, lethal and non-lethal capabilities to prosecute these campaigns. And at the end we have to conduct operations ashore.” –General Robert B. Neller 37th Commandant of the Marine Corps Sobering Sessions and Preparedness Panels Near term equipping for the Corps to fight and win in extraordi- narily lethal littoral zones is a daunting challenge but ably addressed in a series of open briefings kicked off on Tuesday morning by Brig- adier General Joseph Shrader, who heads up Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC). MCSC’s managers laid out needs for Command elements, Ground Combat, Logistics, Support, Training and Wargaming. Naturally, Ground Combat was our main focus, with Colonel Mike Manning detailing 15 specific areas of primary interest. Among these are opportunities to provide improved vehicle protection from various explosive warheads and more sophisticated weapon sights. Specific requirements are noted in several RFIs/RFPs including Squad Common Robert Bruce Optics and Suppressors. Brigadier General Joseph Shrader, Commander, MARCORSYSCOM, (Editor’s Note: All of these Planning Briefs to Industry are available for emphasizes a point in his introduction to Tuesday morning’s Planning download at MARCORSYSCOM.marines.mil Click the COMMAND BRIEFS Briefs to Industry. marcorsyscom.marines.mil TO INDUSTRY bar.) www.smallarmsreview.com 43 Small Arms Review Vol. 22, No. 3 Robert Bruce Visiting from HK’s headquarters in Germany, Bernard Haertenstein (center) joins Mike Thornton (left) and Robbie Reidsma in manning the exhibit booth. They have lots of reasons to smile given HK’s recent victories including award of the Army’s CSASS contract (up to 3600 rifles) and USMC’s latest acquisition of an additional 50,800 M27 IARs. hk-usa.com Rounding out Tuesday’s program were briefings on Science and Tech- nology, Non-Lethal Weapons and a very welcome tutorial for small busi- nesses on how to do business with the Corps. Wednesday kicked off with the colorful Enlisted Awards Parade, immediately followed by General Neller’s keynote address. Then, there were two panel discussions building on the Commandant’s remarks. USMC Intelligence Activity examined Challenges to the Future Opera- tional Environment and Warfighting Lab/Futures Directorate providing perspective on Challenges and Opportunities in Littoral Operations. Thursday’s panels included a report on experimentation by Warfight- ing/Futures—including robots and the new fielding of quadcopters— and next generation requirements like beachhead-swarming mini-bots foreseen by Capabilities Development Directorate. For specific solicitations and contract awards see FEDBIZOPPS. Also, Defense Innovation Marketplace is a comprehensive resource: defen- seinnovationmarketplace.mil Show and Tell Robert Bruce AAI/Textron’s leading edge CT (Cased Telescoped) duo of 5.56 and The Corps wisely uses the timing of the annual Expo in a number of ways 7.62mm belt-fed guns will soon be joined by a handy 6.5mm CT Car- as an efficient opportunity for meaningful interaction with large and small bine, seen here in preliminary mockup form as engineer Kevin Ayotte sources in the defense industry. It’s a two-way information superhighway details its features and benefits. While its overall weight is a bit more at that bypasses many of the bureaucratic bottlenecks encountered in deal- this stage than an M4, a standard combat load of “lipstick-tube” plas- ing with other services making up the US Armed Forces. tic-cased telescoped cartridges will be much lighter than conventional Following Tuesday’s Planning Briefings, show exhibitors who had brass-cased ammo. Overall length (stock collapsed) is 32 inches, feeds made on-site arrangements were given the opportunity for face- cartridges pushed forward from a detachable box magazine, fires from to-face meetings with decision makers. This facilitates meaningful a closed bolt for accuracy, clean gas-operated tappet and piston, select show and tell right at the vendor’s booth or in Tent B’s distinctive fire with full-auto at 600 rpm. textronsystems.com/what-we-do/weap- “Marine Zone.” on-sensor-systems/LSAT Small Arms Review Vol. 22, No. 3 44 MARCH 2018 SHOW REPORTMODERN DAY MARINE |EXPO 2017 Robert Bruce Optics-1’s Integrated Compact Ultralight Gun-Mounted Range- finder has recently been selected for the USMC’s Sniper Range Finder program. “I-CUGR is a small, lightweight and rugged weap- Robert Bruce on-mounted laser rangefinder with integrated illumination and aim- While not selected as the Army’s new Modular handgun, the 9mm Glock ing lasers that will give the USMC the ability to quickly range targets 19 got the FBI’s substantial contract. Seen here is the new Gen 5 ver- without taking hands off their rifles–providing more accurate first sion. “The Marine Corps is equipping Marines with a new weapon, pro- round hits.” While not necessarily a direct result of Warfighting Lab’s viding enhanced concealed carry capabilities at an accelerated rate and annual Marksmanship Technology Demonstration, it clearly demon- lower cost to the Corps. The Glock 19M–called the M007 by the Corps– strates “commercial off-the-shelf technologies with potential to replaces the M9 service pistol for personnel requiring a weapon that can address Marine Corps marksmanship gaps.” optics1.com be easily concealed. The M007 offers enhanced concealed carry capabil- ities, which include a smaller frame, ambidextrous slide stop lever and Show, Tell, Shoot flared magazine well. Marine Corps Systems Command recently fielded nce per year, Weapons Training Battalion, in conjunc- the M007 to Marine and civilian CID agents and members of Helicopter tion with Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory, will Squadron One.” us.glock.com invite select industry participants to the Marksman- “Oship Technology Demonstration to demonstrate commercial off- the-shelf technologies with potential to address Marine Corps marksmanship gaps. The Marksmanship Technology Demonstration is not a tradeshow” (RFI for 2017 MTD) While making the rounds of gun-oriented exhibits we caught wind of some live-fire show and tell underway on Quantico’s ranges—by invitation only and closed to press. We followed up later through offi- cial USMC channels and got the straight scoop on what and why. A formal RFI (Request for Information), issued months earlier, invited industry participation in an MTD exclusively for “Marine Corps units/agencies that are within the capability development process.” This year’s focus was on targets and rifle components, specifi- cally Automated Smart Static and Mobile Target Systems, Infantry Rifles, Suppressors and Optics. Naturally, we asked for info on par- ticipating entities and their products. That was a no-go, but that’s understandable, and we don’t choose to reveal here the ones we know about. The RFI made it clear the potential payoff for participants was by no means assured, “... promising technologies may be selected for extended user evaluations.” Robert Bruce Officials also emphasized that, “The MTD held in 2016 and 2017 Richard Berry of Knight’s Armament shows their belt-fed 5.56mm Light were not associated with MDM. The MTD 2017 was aligned with Assault Machine Gun, a significant improvement over standard M249 MDM to make it easier for the vendors. The MTD scheduled for 2018 SAWs. At 8.6 pounds dry, Knight’s says it “delivers the needed sustained will NOT be an MDM event even if held during the same period.” volume of fire to an assault element at a low enough weight to keep We read you Lima Charlie (loud and clear) and urge purveyors pace with an assault.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Army's M-4 Carbine: Background and Issues for Congress
    The Army’s M-4 Carbine: Background and Issues for Congress Andrew Feickert Specialist in Military Ground Forces June 8, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS22888 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress The Army’s M-4 Carbine: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The M-4 carbine is the Army’s primary individual combat weapon for infantry units. While there have been concerns raised by some about the M-4’s reliability and lethality, some studies suggest that the M-4 is performing well and is viewed favorably by users. The Army is undertaking both the M4 Carbine Improvement Program and the Individual Carbine Competition, the former to identify ways to improve the current weapon, and the latter to conduct an open competition among small arms manufacturers for a follow-on weapon. An integrated product team comprising representatives from the Infantry Center; the Armament, Research, Development, and Engineering Center; the Program Executive Office Soldier; and each of the armed services will assess proposed improvements to the M4. The proposal for the industry-wide competition is currently before the Joint Requirements Oversight Council, and with the anticipated approval, solicitation for industry submissions could begin this fall. It is expected, however, that a selection for a follow-on weapon will not occur before FY2013, and that fielding of a new weapon would take an additional three to four years. This report will be updated as events warrant. Congressional Research Service The
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Homeland Security Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2008
    S. HRG. 110–36 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION Department of Homeland Security Nondepartmental witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 33–920 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, Chairman DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont TED STEVENS, Alaska TOM HARKIN, Iowa ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico HERB KOHL, Wisconsin CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATTY MURRAY, Washington MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas JACK REED, Rhode Island SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado BEN NELSON, Nebraska LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director BRUCE EVANS, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, Chairman DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland TED STEVENS, Alaska HERB KOHL, Wisconsin ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania PATTY MURRAY, Washington PETE V.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Training Cata
    Training for the Military HIGH MOBILITY MULTIPURPOSE WHEELED VEHICLE 0665 FIELD SERVICE AND MILITARY TRAINING COURSE CATALOG Aftermarket Fulfillment and Training Center (AFTC) 5448 Dylan Drive, South Bend, Indiana 46628 Contents General Information 4 Student Registration 5 Payment Information 5 Advanced Mobility / Maintenance / BDAR 6 Field Maintenance Training 8 Sustainment Maintenance Training 10 4L80E Transmission Maintenance Training 12 “ Whether it is ‘training readiness,,’’ combat operations, Air Conditioning Systems Maintenance 14 oror domesticdomestic response to floods and other natural disasters, itit isis thethe soldiersoldier inin hishis oror herher HumveeHumvee thatthat AmeriAmerica sees Alternator / Starter / Electrical Systems Maintenance 16 ccoming to their aide.” —Major—Major GeneGenerral Courtneeyy CarCarrr,, IIndiana Naationaltional GuaGuarrd Diesel Fuel Injection Pump Maintenance Training 17 Visitor Information 18 2 3 2 Our program development experience has been Training gained throtugh the development of training on a myriad of equipment from the Humvee through Program various tactical bridging equipment, such as the Improved Ribbon Bridge, the Rapidly Emplaced Bridge Development System, all of the MK II series Bridge Erection Boats, as well as MRAP, LTAS Wrecker, water purification and AM General’s Military Training Department fuel distribution systems. is a TRADOC certified world leader in All of our training programs are written to comply with training program development. TRADOC Regulation 350-70. Our expert program writers and Military Training Department Staff graphic llustrators are highly trained, AM General’s Training Department provides and credentialed professionals. professional training programs at all military skill (echelon) levels for Army systems used in the military inventory. Our technical writers and program to develop professional programs of instruction (POI).
    [Show full text]
  • Standards in Weapons Training (Special Operations Forces)
    Department of the Army Pamphlet 350–39 Training Standards in Weapons Training (Special Operations Forces) Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 3 July 1997 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE DA PAM 350–39 Standards in Weapons Training (Special Operations Forces) This revision-- o Deletes requirements for M72A2 light antitank weapon (LAW) (Chap 2). o Deletes requirements for ranger antiarmor-antipersonnel weapon system (RAAWS) (Chap 2). o Deletes requirements for Stinger crews (Chap 2). o Deletes requirements for mine warfare (Chap 2). o Deletes requirements for MGXX warfare (Chap 2). o Deletes requirements for CAR15 warfare (Chap 2). o Deletes requirements for Combat Training Center (CTC) (Chap 2). o Adds requirements for rocket propelled grenades (RPG) (Chap 3). o Adds requirements for close-quarters combat (CQC) (Chap 3). o Adds requirements for recoilless rifles (RCRL) 84-mm and 90-mm (Chap 3). o Adds requirements for Stinger crews (Chap 3). o Adds requirements for mortars 107-mm (Chap 3). Headquarters *Department of the Army Department of the Army Pamphlet 350–39 Washington, DC 3 July 1997 Training Standards in Weapons Training (Special Operations Forces) procedures for planning, resourcing, and exe- of Staff for Operations and Plans may dele- cuting training. It includes weapons qualifica- gate this authority, in writing, to a division tion standards, suggested training programs, chief within the proponent agency or a field and ammunition requirements for the attain- operating agency in the grade of colonel or ment and sustainment of weapons proficien- the civilian equivalent. c y . T h e p r o g r a m s i n c o r p o r a t e t r a i n i n g devices and simulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Robotic Systems to Carry out Traverse Execution, Opportunistic Science, and Landing Site Evaluation Tasks
    NASA/TM-2011-216157 Evaluation of Robotic Systems to Carry Out Traverse Execution, Opportunistic Science, and Landing Site Evaluation Tasks Stephen J. Hoffman, PhD1, Matthew J. Leonard2, Pascal Lee, PhD3 1Science Applications International Corporation, Houston 2NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston 3Mars Institute, SETI Institute, Moffett Field, California National Aeronautics and Space Administration Johnson Space Center Houston, TX 77058 September 2011 THE NASA STI PROGRAM OFFICE . IN PROFILE Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected the advancement of aeronautics and space papers from scientific and technical science. The NASA Scientific and Technical conferences, symposia, seminars, or other Information (STI) Program Office plays a key meetings sponsored or cosponsored by part in helping NASA maintain this important NASA. role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, technical, or historical information from The NASA STI Program Office is operated by NASA programs, projects, and mission, Langley Research Center, the lead center for often concerned with subjects having NASA’s scientific and technical information. substantial public interest. The NASA STI Program Office provides access to the NASA STI Database, the largest • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION English- collection of aeronautical and space science STI language translations of foreign scientific in the world. The Program Office is also and technical material pertinent to NASA’s NASA’s institutional mechanism for mission. disseminating the results of its research and Specialized services that complement the STI development activities. These results are Program Office’s diverse offerings include published by NASA in the NASA STI Report creating custom thesauri, building customized Series, which includes the following report databases, organizing and publishing research types: results .
    [Show full text]
  • Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century
    US Army TRADOC TRADOC G2 Handbook No. 1 AA MilitaryMilitary GuideGuide toto TerrorismTerrorism in the Twenty-First Century US Army Training and Doctrine Command TRADOC G2 TRADOC Intelligence Support Activity - Threats Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 15 August 2007 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. 1 Summary of Change U.S. Army TRADOC G2 Handbook No. 1 (Version 5.0) A Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century Specifically, this handbook dated 15 August 2007 • Provides an information update since the DCSINT Handbook No. 1, A Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century, publication dated 10 August 2006 (Version 4.0). • References the U.S. Department of State, Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Country Reports on Terrorism 2006 dated April 2007. • References the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), Reports on Terrorist Incidents - 2006, dated 30 April 2007. • Deletes Appendix A, Terrorist Threat to Combatant Commands. By country assessments are available in U.S. Department of State, Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Country Reports on Terrorism 2006 dated April 2007. • Deletes Appendix C, Terrorist Operations and Tactics. These topics are covered in chapter 4 of the 2007 handbook. Emerging patterns and trends are addressed in chapter 5 of the 2007 handbook. • Deletes Appendix F, Weapons of Mass Destruction. See TRADOC G2 Handbook No.1.04. • Refers to updated 2007 Supplemental TRADOC G2 Handbook No.1.01, Terror Operations: Case Studies in Terror, dated 25 July 2007. • Refers to Supplemental DCSINT Handbook No. 1.02, Critical Infrastructure Threats and Terrorism, dated 10 August 2006. • Refers to Supplemental DCSINT Handbook No.
    [Show full text]
  • AM General V. Activision Blizzard
    Case 1:17-cv-08644-GBD-JLC Document 218 Filed 03/31/20 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORI( -- -- ----- -- -- ------------------------- --x AM GENERAL LLC, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION -against- AND ORDER ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., ACTIVISION 17 Civ. 8644 (GBD) PUBLISHING, INC., and MAJOR LEAGUE GAMING CORP., Defendants. --------- -- --- -- --------- -- -- -- ---- -- - --x GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff AM General LLC ("AMG") brings this action against Defendants Activision Blizzard, Inc. and Activision Publishing, Inc. (collectively, "Activision") and Major League Gaming Corp. ("MLG") for trademark infringement, trade dress infringement, unfair competition, false designation of origin, false advertising, and dilution under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1125, and 1125(c), respectively. (Compl., ECF No. 1, ~~ 82-147.) AMG also raises pendant New York state law claims for trademark infringement, unfair competition, false designation of origin, trade dress infringement, false advertising, and dilution. (Jd. ~~ 148-81.) On May 31, 2019, Defendants moved for summaty judgment on all of AMG's claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (Defs. Activision and MLG's Notice of Mot. for Summ. J., ECF No. 131.) On the same day, Plaintiff moved for partial summaty judgment on Defendants' laches claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a). (PI. AMG's Notice of Mot. for Partial Summ. J., ECF No. 138.) Subsequently, Defendants filed a motion to strike (1) certain portions of Plaintiffs Rule 56.1 statement of material facts and (2) the "experiment" contained in the rebuttal report of Plaintiff s expeli, Dr. Y oran Wind ("MTS I").
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Court Between
    Court File No. T-735-20 FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: CHRISTINE GENEROUX JOHN PEROCCHIO, and VINCENT R. R. PEROCCHIO Applicants and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent AFFIDAVIT OF MURRAY SMITH Table of Contents A. Background 3 B. The Firearms Reference Table 5 The Canadian Firearms Program (CFP): 5 The Specialized Firearms Support Services (SFSS): 5 The Firearms Reference Table (FRT): 5 Updates to the FRT in light of the Regulation 6 Notice to the public about the Regulation 7 C. Variants 8 The Nine Families 8 Variants 9 D. Bore diameter and muzzle energy limit 12 Measurement of bore diameter: 12 The parts of a firearm 13 The measurement of bore diameter for shotguns 15 The measurement of bore diameter for rifles 19 Muzzle Energy 21 E. Non-prohibited firearms currently available for hunting and shooting 25 Hunting 25 Sport shooting 27 F. Examples of firearms used in mass shooting events in Canada that are prohibited by the Regulation 29 2 I, Murray Smith, of Ottawa, Ontario, do affirm THAT: A. Background 1. I am a forensic scientist with 42 years of experience in relation to firearms. 2. I was employed by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (“RCMP”) during the period of 1977 to 2020. I held many positions during that time, including the following: a. from 1989 to 2002,1 held the position of Chief Scientist responsible for the technical policy and quality assurance of the RCMP forensic firearms service, and the provision of technical advice to the government and police policy centres on firearms and other weapons; and b.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Arms-Individual Weapons
    290 Small Arms–Individual Weapons INVESTMENT COMPONENT Modernization thousand M14 EBRs were assembled be mounted on the shotgun. The bolt • 1QFY09: Materiel release and full- at TACOM Lifecycle Management handle is mountable on either side for rate production decision Recapitalization Command at Rock Island Arsenal in ambidextrous handling. • 3QFY09: First unit equipped response to Operational Need Statements M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun Maintenance requesting a longer range capability. The MASS enables Soldiers to transition System: The upgraded weapons are currently in between lethal and less-than-lethal fires • 4QFY09: Limited user test and MISSION service with select Army units. and adds the capability of a separate evaluation with MP units Enables warfighters and small units to shotgun without carrying a second • 2QFY10: Low-rate initial production engage targets with lethal fire to defeat The M320 Grenade Launcher is the weapon. Additional features include a approved or deter adversaries. replacement to all M203 series grenade box magazine, flip-up sights, and an • 4QFY10: First article testing launchers on M16 Rifles and M4 extendable stand-off device for door complete DESCRIPTION Carbines. A modular system, it attaches breaching. The M4 Carbine replaces the M16 series under the barrel of the rifle or carbine PROJECTED ACTIVITIES Rifles in all Brigade Combat Teams, and can convert to a stand-alone weapon. SYSTEM INTERDEPENDENCIES M4 Carbine: Division Headquarters, and other The M320 improves on current grenade None • Continue: M4 production, deliveries, selected units. It is 1.4 pounds lighter launchers with an integral day/night and fielding and more portable than the M16 series of sighting system and improved safety PROGRAM STATUS M14 EBR: rifles.
    [Show full text]
  • Gordon V. Sig Sauer, Inc
    Case 4:19-cv-00585 Document 1 Filed on 02/20/19 in TXSD Page 1 of 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION DANTÉ GORDON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CASE NO. _____________ Plaintiff, v. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT SIG SAUER, INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT Plaintiff Danté Gordon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated as set forth herein, alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a class action brought by gun owners against Defendant SIG SAUER, Inc. (“SIG” or “SIG SAUER”) for manufacturing, distributing, and selling SIG P320-brand semi- automatic pistols that, due to a defect, can inadvertently discharge a round of ammunition if dropped on the ground (a “drop fire”). SIG repeatedly misrepresented and warranted that the P320 pistols were “drop safe,” “won’t fire unless you want [them] to,” and are “originally manufactured free of defects in material, workmanship and mechanical function.” SIG’s original design and manufacture of the P320 pistol rendered the weapon unreasonably dangerous for its intended uses. 2. The P320 is a popular and commercially successful pistol. It is used by law enforcement agencies all over the country, and owned by hundreds of thousands of civilians. In Case 4:19-cv-00585 Document 1 Filed on 02/20/19 in TXSD Page 2 of 31 2016, the U.S. Army selected the SIG P320 to replace the M9 service pistol as the standard-issue sidearm of U.S. military servicemembers.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. __________ IN THE Supreme Court of the United States LAWRENCE G. HUTCHINS III, SERGEANT, UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI S. BABU KAZA CHRIS G. OPRISON LtCol, USMCR DLA Piper LLP (US) THOMAS R. FRICTON 500 8th St, NW Captain, USMC Washington DC Counsel of Record Civilian Counsel for U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Petitioner Appellate Defense Division 202-664-6543 1254 Charles Morris St, SE Washington Navy Yard, D.C. 20374 202-685-7291 [email protected] i QUESTION PRESENTED In Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 (1970), this Court held that the collateral estoppel aspect of the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a prosecution that depends on a fact necessarily decided in the defendant’s favor by an earlier acquittal. Here, the Petitioner, Sergeant Hutchins, successfully fought war crime charges at his first trial which alleged that he had conspired with his subordinate Marines to commit a killing of a randomly selected Iraqi victim. The members panel (jury) specifically found Sergeant Hutchins not guilty of that aspect of the conspiracy charge, and of the corresponding overt acts and substantive offenses. The panel instead found Sergeant Hutchins guilty of the lesser-included offense of conspiring to commit an unlawful killing of a named suspected insurgent leader, and found Sergeant Hutchins guilty of the substantive crimes in furtherance of that specific conspiracy. After those convictions were later reversed, Sergeant Hutchins was taken to a second trial in 2015 where the Government once again alleged that the charged conspiracy agreement was for the killing of a randomly selected Iraqi victim, and presented evidence of the overt acts and criminal offenses for which Sergeant Hutchins had previously been acquitted.
    [Show full text]
  • PM Crew Served Weapons Overview Small Arms Symposium & Exhibition
    TheThe Soldier:Soldier: America’sAmerica’s MostMost DeployedDeployed CombatCombat SystemSystem PM Crew Served Weapons Overview for the Small Arms Symposium & Exhibition National Defense Industrial Association 16-19 May 2006 BG James R. Moran COL Carl A. Lipsit Mr. Peter Errante Program Executive Officer Soldier PM Soldier Weapons Deputy PM Crew Served Weapons Crew Served Weapons 2 PM Soldier Weapons Programs List DEVELOPMENT WEAPONS PROCUREMENT Objective Individual Combat Weapon (OICW) 37. M101, CROWS, Remote Mount 1. OICW Increment I 38. M151E1 & M151E2 Protector Remote Wpn System (RWS) 2. OICW Increment II - XM25 Air Burst Weapon 39. MK19 Advanced Crew Served Weapons (ACSW) 40. Mod Kit 3. Advanced Crew Served Weapon (ACSW) Programs 41. Lightweight Adjustable Sight Bracket 42. Tactical Engagement Simulator (TES) SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAMS 43. M107 Semi Automatic Long Range Sniper Rifle 4. XM26 - 12 Gauge Modular Accessory Shotgun System 44. M240B, 7.62mm Medium MG (MASS) 45. M240B Collapsible Buttstock 5. Joint Combat Pistol 46. M192, Light Weight Ground Mount For MG 6. Family of Small Arms Suppressors 47. Improved Bipod 7. M68 Close Combat Optics (Dual Source Qualification) 48. Improved Flash Suppressor 8. XM1068, 12 Gauge Non-Lethal Extended Range Round 49. Combat Ammunition Pack 9. XM1022, Sniper Ammunition for M107 50. M240B Short Barrel 10. XM110 - 7.62 Semi-Automatic Sniper System (SASS) 51. M240B Improved Buttstock 11. Close Quarters Battle Kit 52. Sling Assembly for the M240B 12. XM1041/XM1042/XM1071 - Close Combat Mission 53. Short Barrel Capability Kit 54. M249, 5.56mm Squad Automatic Weapon 13. Advanced Sniper Accessory Kit (ASAK) 55. M192, Lightweight Ground Mount For MG 14.
    [Show full text]