DOCSLIB.ORG

Howard County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Howard County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2017 Howard County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2017 Prepared by: Mid-Missouri Regional Planning Commission 206 East Broadway P.O. Box 140 Ashland, MO 65010 Phone: (573) 657-9779 Fax: (573) 657-2829 Plan available online at mmrpc.org Cover Photos: Flood and wind are two of the most damaging natural hazards in Howard County. Aerial photos show flooding in 1993 and tornado damage in 2006. Photos courtesy of Fayette Advertiser/Democrat Leader. Table of Contents List of Acronyms Used in Plan vi Executive Summary 1 Prerequisites 2 Section 1: Introduction and Planning Process 1.1 Purpose 4 1.2 Background 5 1.3 History of the Howard County Hazard Mitigation Plan 5 1.4 Participating Jurisdictions 7 1.5 The Update Process 10 Section 2: Planning Area Profile and Capabilities 2.1 Geography and Ecology 17 2.2 Climate 23 2.3 History 25 2.4 Natural Hazard History 26 2.5 Demographics 29 2.6 Education 32 2.7 Employment and Income 34 2.8 Transportation and Commuting Patterns 37 2.9 Planning Area Capabilities 41 Legal Authority 41 Policy, Planning, and Program Capabilities 42 National Flood Insurance Program 43 Communications and Media 44 Special Districts 48 Fire Protection Districts 48 Water Districts 50 Non-Governmental and Volunteer Organizations 52 Community and Regional Partnerships 52 Political Willpower 52 2.10 Participating Jurisdictions - Profiles and Assets 53 Overview of Planning Area 53 Howard County 57 Armstrong 62 Fayette 65 Glasgow 68 New Franklin 71 New Franklin R-I School District 74 Howard Co. R-II School District 75 Fayette R-III School District 76 Central Methodist University 77 Howard Co. Consolidated Water District #1 79 Howard Co. Regional Water Commission 81 Section 3: Risk Assessment 3.1 Introduction and Methodology 83 Identification of Hazards 83 Profiling Hazards 84 Assessment of Vulnerability 85 Inventory of Assets 87 3.2 Hazard Profiles and Vulnerability Overviews 88 3.2.1 Dam Failure 88 3.2.2 Drought 105 3.2.3 Earthquake 116 3.2.4 Extreme Heat 129 3.2.5 Flood 136 NFIP Repetitive Losses Properties 159 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) 160 3.2.6 Land Subsidence/Sinkhole 163 3.2.7 Levee Failure 167 3.2.8 Severe Winter Weather 185 3.2.9 Wildfire 194 3.2.10 Thunderstorm, Windstorm and Hailstorm 204 Windstorm 207 Hailstorm 211 3.2.11 Tornado 217 Section 4: Mitigation Strategy 4.1 Hazard Mitigation Goals 225 4.2 Update of Mitigation Actions 226 4.3 Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions 233 Mitigation Actions by Hazard and Jurisdiction 237 Mitigation Actions Addressing Compliance with NFIP Requirements 242 4.4 Prioritization, Implementation, and Administration 243 4.4.1 Prioritization of Actions using STAPLEE and Benefit/Cost Reviews 243 4.4.2 Implementation and Administration in Participating Jurisdictions 251 Howard County 252 Armstrong 263 Fayette 267 Glasgow 275 New Franklin 282 New Franklin R-I School District 287 Howard Co. R-II School District 291 Fayette R-III School District 295 Central Methodist University 299 Howard Co. Consolidated Public Water Supply District #1 302 Howard Co. Regional Water Commission 304 4.5 Funding Sources 307 Section 5: Plan Maintenance Process 5.1 Plan Monitoring and Evaluation 313 5.2 Plan Updating 315 5.4 Public Participation in Plan Maintenance 316 Appendices Appendix A Adoption Resolutions Appendix B Meeting Announcements and Agendas Appendix C Planning Meeting Participants Appendix D Jurisdictional Value Statements Appendix E Fire District Burning Ordinances “Across the United States, natural, manmade, and other disasters have led to increasing numbers of deaths, injuries, property damages, and disruptions of business and government services. This can take an immense toll on people, businesses and government, especially in these challenging economic times. The time, money and effort to respond to and recover from disasters divert public resources and attention from other important programs. Hazard mitigation is defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as any action taken to eliminate or reduce the long-term risk to human life and property from hazards and their effects. This is crucial to the residents, businesses, and governments of Missouri. Hazard Mitigation is the only phase of emergency management specifically dedicated to breaking the cycle of damage, reconstruction, and repeated damage.” - Missouri State Hazard Mitigation Plan, July 2010 List of Acronyms Used in Plan CDBG – Community Development Block Grant CSIP – Comprehensive School Improvement Plan DED – Department of Economic Development DHSS - Department of Health and Senior Services EMD – Emergency Management Director EAP – Emergency Action Plan EOC – Emergency Operations Center EOP - Emergency Operations Plan FCC – Federal Communications Commission FEMA - Federal Emergency Management Agency FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map HAZUS-MH - Risk assessment software program for analyzing potential losses from floods, hurricane winds and earthquakes HCEDC – Howard County Economic Development Council MDFS - Missouri Division of Fire Safety Mid-MO RPC – Mid-Missouri Regional Planning Commission MMI - Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale MoDNR – Missouri Department of Natural Resources MoDOT – Missouri Department of Transportation MSA – Metropolitan Statistical Area MSHSAA - Missouri State High School Activities Association MULES – a law enforcement computer data network used by the Missouri Highway Patrol NAWAS – National Warning System NDMC - National Drought Mitigation Center NFIP – National Flood Insurance Program NMSZ - New Madrid Seismic Zone NOAA - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NWS – National Weather Service OMB - U.S. Office of Management and Budget PDSI - Palmer Drought Severity Index PWSD – Public Water Supply District RSMo – Revised Statutes of Missouri SAME – Specific Area Message Encoding SEMA - State Emergency Management Agency SoVI™ - Social Vulnerability Index SPI - Standardized Precipitation Index STAPLEE – a prioritization tool using Social, Technical, Administrative, Political, Legal, Economic, and Environmental factors for analysis USDA - U.S. Department of Agriculture USGS - United States Geological Survey USFWS – United States Fish and Wildlife Service Executive Summary The Howard County Hazard Mitigation Plan is a multi-jurisdictional plan prepared and written with the participation of Howard County government and the following Howard County communities, school districts, special districts, and university: City of Armstrong, City of Fayette, City of New Franklin, City of Glasgow, New Franklin R-I School District, Howard County R-II School District, Fayette R-III School District, Central Methodist University, Armstrong Fire Protection District, Fayette Fire Department, Howard Co. Fire Protection District, Bonne Femme Levee District #1, Howard Co. Levee District # 2, Howard Co. Drainage District # 3, Howard Co. Levee District # 4, Howard Co. Levee District #6, Howard Co. Drainage District # 7, Public Water Supply District #1, and Howard County Regional Water Commission. Howard County, Armstrong, Fayette, New Franklin, Glasgow, New Franklin R-I School District, Howard County R-II School District, Fayette R-III School District, Central Methodist University, and Howard County Regional Water Commission completed the requirements to be considered participating jurisdictions in the plan. The plan profiles twelve natural hazards (Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Heat, Flood, Levee Failure, Land Subsidence/Sinkhole, Severe Winter Weather, Wildfire, Windstorm, Tornado, and Hailstorm) which threaten lives and property in some, or all, of the participating jurisdictions. All hazards were evaluated with regard to previous occurrence, probability and severity of future occurrence, existing mitigation strategies, and the potential impact on each jurisdiction. An overall mitigation strategy was developed through the consideration of potential threats and the resources and willpower available to mitigate their effects. The goals of this mitigation strategy are: Goal 1: Mitigation Planning - Mitigate effects of future natural hazards throughout the County through public and private cooperation. Goal 2: Mitigation Policy - Develop policies that limit the impact of natural hazards on lives and property. Goal 3: Mitigation Programs - Implement cost effective and feasible mitigation programs to protect lives and property of Howard County jurisdictions. Goal 4: Public Awareness - Increase public awareness of natural hazards in order to make the public a greater partner in hazard mitigation planning. Goal 5: Future Development - Promote hazard-proof development in the jurisdictions of Howard County. Specific mitigation actions have been developed and prioritized to further the goals of the overall mitigation strategy in each participating jurisdiction. 1 The Howard Hazard Mitigation Plan will be formally adopted by each of the participating jurisdictions prior to the final draft approval by FEMA. Participation in, and formal adoption of, the plan qualifies a jurisdiction to apply for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) pre-disaster mitigation grants and the mitigation portion of post-disaster mitigation grants. The plan will be updated in five years, as required by FEMA. It will be evaluated and maintained on an annual basis prior to this update. 2 Prerequisites Multi-Jurisdictional Plan Adoption Requirement For multi-jurisdictional plans, each jurisdiction requesting approval §201.6(c)(5): of the plan must document that it has been formally adopted. Adoption resolutions for the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Missouri River Floodplain from River Mile (RM) 670 South of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St
    Hydrogeomorphic Evaluation of Ecosystem Restoration Options For The Missouri River Floodplain From River Mile (RM) 670 South of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St. Louis, Missouri Prepared For: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 Minneapolis, Minnesota Greenbrier Wetland Services Report 15-02 Mickey E. Heitmeyer Joseph L. Bartletti Josh D. Eash December 2015 HYDROGEOMORPHIC EVALUATION OF ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION OPTIONS FOR THE MISSOURI RIVER FLOODPLAIN FROM RIVER MILE (RM) 670 SOUTH OF DECATUR, NEBRASKA TO RM 0 AT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI Prepared For: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 Refuges and Wildlife Minneapolis, Minnesota By: Mickey E. Heitmeyer Greenbrier Wetland Services Advance, MO 63730 Joseph L. Bartletti Prairie Engineers of Illinois, P.C. Springfield, IL 62703 And Josh D. Eash U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 3 Water Resources Branch Bloomington, MN 55437 Greenbrier Wetland Services Report No. 15-02 December 2015 Mickey E. Heitmeyer, PhD Greenbrier Wetland Services Route 2, Box 2735 Advance, MO 63730 www.GreenbrierWetland.com Publication No. 15-02 Suggested citation: Heitmeyer, M. E., J. L. Bartletti, and J. D. Eash. 2015. Hydrogeomorphic evaluation of ecosystem restoration options for the Missouri River Flood- plain from River Mile (RM) 670 south of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St. Louis, Missouri. Prepared for U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3, Min- neapolis, MN. Greenbrier Wetland Services Report 15-02, Blue Heron Conservation Design and Print- ing LLC, Bloomfield, MO. Photo credits: USACE; http://statehistoricalsocietyofmissouri.org/; Karen Kyle; USFWS http://digitalmedia.fws.gov/cdm/; Cary Aloia This publication printed on recycled paper by ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chariton River Watershed and Inventory Assessmient
    Chariton River Watershed and Inventory Assessment, date Prepared by Darcy N. Cashatt and David J. Neuswanger, Fisheries Management Biologist Kirksville Fisheries Regional Supervisors, 2500 S. Haliburton Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Location ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Stream Orders and Mileages ..................................................................................................................... 5 Geology/Geomorphology .............................................................................................................................. 7 Physiographic Region/Geology/Soils ....................................................................................................... 7 Stream Channel Gradients ........................................................................................................................ 7 Land Use ..................................................................................................................................................... 24 Historical Land Use ................................................................................................................................ 24 Modern Land Use ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Transport and Deposition in the Lower Missouri River During the 2011 Flood
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sediment Transport and Deposition in the Lower Missouri River During the 2011 Flood Chapter F of 2011 Floods of the Central United States Professional Paper 1798–F U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover. Top photograph: View of flooding from Nebraska City, Nebraska, looking east across the Missouri River, August 2, 2011. Photograph by Robert Swanson, U.S. Geological Survey. Right photograph: USGS scientist collecting a sediment sample from the Missouri River at Sioux City, Iowa, September 16, 2011. Photograph by Ryan Tompkins, U.S. Geological Survey. Back cover. Sand from the 2011 flood on the flood plain in northwestern Missouri, September 22, 2012. Photograph by Robert Jacobson, U.S. Geological Survey. Sediment Transport and Deposition in the Lower Missouri River During the 2011 Flood By Jason S. Alexander, Robert B. Jacobson, and David L. Rus Chapter F of 2011 Floods of the Central United States In cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Professional Paper 1798–F U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Occurrence of Chestnut Lamprey (Lchthyomyzon Castaneus; Pisces: Petromyzontidae) in the Chariton River in South-Central Iowa
    Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science: JIAS Volume 117 | Number 1-4 Article 3 2010 The ccO urrence of Chestnut Lamprey (lchthyomyzon castaneus; Pisces: Petromyzontidae) in the Chariton River in South- Central Iowa Mark K. Flammang Iowa Department of Natural Resources John R. Olson Iowa Department of Natural Resources Copyright © Copyright 2011 by the Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/jias Part of the Anthropology Commons, Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Flammang, Mark K. and Olson, John R. (2010) "The cO currence of Chestnut Lamprey (lchthyomyzon castaneus; Pisces: Petromyzontidae) in the Chariton River in South-Central Iowa," Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science: JIAS: Vol. 117: No. 1-4 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/jias/vol117/iss1/3 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science: JIAS by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Jour. Iowa Acad. Sci. 117(1-4):1-3, 2010 The Occurrence of Chestnut Lamprey (lchthyomyzon castaneus; Pisces: Petromyzontidae) in the Chariton River in South-Central Iowa MARK K. FLAMMANG1 and JOHN R. OLSON2 1 Iowa Department of Natural Resources, 1505 3 Hatchery Place, Moravia, Iowa 525 71 2lowa Department of Natural Resources, Wallace State Office Building, 502 E. 9th Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50319 In the mid-1990s_, Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) Fisheries Bureau biologists began receiving reports from anglers of a parasitic lamprey attached to fish taken immediately downstream from Rathbun Lake on the Chariton River in south-central Iowa; these reports have continued to present.
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Time River Channel-Bed Monitoring at the Chariton and Mississippi Rivers in Missouri, 2007–09
    U.S. Geological Survey Geological U.S. DepartmentInterior the U.S. of 2009–5254 Report Investigations Scientific 2007–09 Missouri, in Rivers Mississippi and Chariton the at Monitoring Channel-Bed River Real-Time Transportation of Department Missouri the with cooperation in Prepared RIVER STAGE ELEVATION, IN FEET ABOVE ZERO GAGE 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 21 222324252627282930311234567 2007 AUGUST 2007 SEPTEMBER Channel bed River stage 8 626.5 627.0 627.5 628.0 628.5 629.0 629.5 630.0 630.5 631.0 631.5 CHANNEL-BED ELEVATION, IN FEET ABOVE NGVD 1929 Cover photograph. River channel-bed monitor installation and channel-bed elevation at the downstream side of the upstream column of pier 4 and river stage from August 21 through September 9, 2007, for the Chariton River near Prairie Hill, Missouri (structure L-344). Photograph by Paul H. Rydlund, Jr., U.S. Geological Survey. Real-Time River Channel-Bed Monitoring at the Chariton and Mississippi Rivers in Missouri, 2007–09 By Paul H. Rydlund, Jr. Prepared in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5254 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2009 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Information for Northwestern Missouri
    O. S. GE01.061CAL smog it C5PI WATER INFORMATION FOR NORTHWESTERN MISSOURI: A PLANNING DOCUMENT U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations 82-27 Prepared in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Land Survey 50272 -101 REPORT DOCUMENTATION 1._REPORT NO. 3. Recipient's Accession No. PAGE 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date WATER INFORMATION FOR NORTHWESTERN MISSOURI--A PLANNING March 1982 DOCUMENT 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Rept. No. John Skelton, E. J. Harvey, and D. E. Miller USGS/WRI 82-27 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division 1400 Independence Road, Mail Stop 200 11. Contract(C) or Grant(G) No. Rolla, Missouri 65401 (C) (G) 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report & Period Covered U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division Final 1400 Independence Road, Mail Stop 200 Rolla, Missouri 65401 14. 15. Supplementary Notes Prepared in cooperation with Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Land Survey 16. Abstract (Limit: 200 words) Water supplies are limited in much of northwestern Missouri, and water-resources data also are limited. The report presents a summary of hydrologic data and an evalu- ation of areas where future hydrologic investigations would be most useful. The largest and most dependable surface-water supplies that can be obtained without storage from tributary streams are from the lower Grand, Nodaway, and Chariton Rivers. The sources of ground water in order of quantities available are the Missouri River alluvium, glacial drift, tributary stream alluvium, and Pennsylvanian bedrock.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Branch Lake, East Fork, Little Chariton River, Missouri
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT LONG BRANCH LAKE EAST FORK. LITTLE CHARITON RIVER MISSOURI Prepared by U.S. Army Engineer District Kansas City, Missouri October 1971 Long Branch Lake, East Fork, Little Chariton Lver, Missouri ( ) Draft (X) Final Environmental Statement Responsible Office: U.S. Army Engineer District, Kansas City, Missouri 1. Name of Action; (X) Administrative ( ) Legislative 2. Description of the Action: Initiate construction on receipt of funds for a dam and lake in Macon County. 3. a. Environmental Impacts: Provide flood protection, water quality control, fish and wildlife conservation, water supply storage and recreation; inundate 20 miles of stream while encouraging intensified agricultural practices downstream and residential and commercial development in the area. b. Adverse Environmental Effects: The lake will inundate 2,430 acres of land, eliminate 20 miles of East Fork of Little Chariton River and associated habitat, and adversely affect forest cover and fish and wildlife habitat downstream. 4. Alternatives; a. Alternative lake sites. b. Doing nothing. c. Small Impoundments in upstream area. d. Nonstructural measures. e. Channelization. 5. Comments Requested; U.S. Department of the Interior Missouri Water Resources Board National Park Service Missouri Department of Bureau of Mines Conservation Bureau of Outdoor Recreation Missouri Inter-Agency Council Bureau of Sport Fisheries and for Outdoor Recreation Wildlife Missouri State Park Board U.S. Department of Agriculture Missouri Department of Health Soil Conservation Service Conservation Federation of Missouri Forest Service Missouri Chapter, American Fisheries Environmental Protection Agency Society Missouri Chapter, Wildlife Society 6. Draft statement to CEQ 29 July 19LL Final statement to CEQ £ 7 JAN 197 2 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT LONG BRANCH LAKE EAST FORK.
    [Show full text]
  • Boone's Lick Heritage Quarterly
    Boone’s Lick Heritage QuarterLy Berenice Morrison-Fuller Part I of Major Essay on Morrison Family BHS Summer Meeting Held in Glasgow at Historic Harrison House VoL. 15 no. 2 — summer 2016 BoonsLick HistoricaL society PeriodicaL Editor’s Page Preview of Things to Come The Morrison Chronicles: In the Beginning … room house in 1871. It was acquired by the Freeses in 2009. Information about the house and a sidebar featuring a reprint In the classical sense when we think of the word Chronicles, of the 1911 obit and tribute written for George B. Harrison and with a capital “C,” we likely are referencing either of two books published in the Glasgow Missourian accompany the article on of the Bible that tell the story of the Israelites from the creation of pages 26 – 27. The obit was given to the Quarterly by BHS mem- Adam to the middle of the sixth century BC. In the literal, little “c,” ber and historian Jim Denny, an inveterate collector of profiles sense, we are referring to a chronological account of past events about historically significant Missourians, especially from the of a period or in the life or development of a people, an institution, Glasgow area where he has long had family ties. or a place. Historian Lynn Morrow’s finely crafted essay on the Morrison family et al of Missouri and Howard County inspires the SHS Fellowships Available reverence of the first definition and aca- The State His- demic accolades in torical Society of terms of the second. Missouri announces Titled “From two Center for Mis- Salt-boiling to souri Studies fellow- Star-gazing: Mar- ship opportunities riage, Merchants, for the calendar year and Money,” this beginning January 52,000-word trea- 1, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical, Pictorical, and Biographical Record of Chariton County, Missouri 1St Edition, Press-Spectator Steam Print, Salisbury, MO 1896
    Historical, Pictorical, and Biographical Record of Chariton County, Missouri 1st Edition, Press-Spectator Steam Print, Salisbury, MO 1896. HISTORY OF CHARITON COUNTY Chariton, the best county, in the best state of the Union, embracing an area of 740 Square miles and containing 466,891 acres of land valued according to the last assessment as $3,846,093, was organized November 16, 1820, being a part of the territory then embraced by the boundary of Howard county, thus almost four score years have come and gone since this, one of the oldest and fairest daughters of the mother country came into existence; and the events and changes, discoveries and inventions that have taken place within this period have indeed been many. At the time of the organization of Chariton County, all that territory now embraced in the counties of Linn, Sullivan, Putnam and a part of Adair and Schuyler were embraced by its bounderies. The county seat was established at the town of Chariton, situaged in the southern part of the county near the mouth of the two rivers of the same name, which streams were called after some early French traders who had a fur agency at this point. These men are supposed to have been the first white persons to press the soil of Chariton county. Just when they made their settlement is unknown, but it is certain they were here as early as 1804. FIRST SETTLEMENTS The earliest permanent settler of the county of whom we have any account was one George JACKSON, who located in the southern part of the county, near the Missouri river, in 1812, and who afterwards represented the county in the General Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Chariton County, Missouri
    7m~vsau CHARITON COUNTY, MISSOURI WILLS and ADMINISTRATIONS 1861-1875 Compiled by Elizabeth Prather Ellsberry hho Vine Street Chillicothe, Missouri ms . M2é55%*’ C’;/)‘c1r‘r7’6 /V CHARITON COUIZY3 MISSOURI Encyclopedia of the History of Missouri Edited by Howard L. Conard, 1901 Volume 1, Pages 56h-567 Chariton County A county situated in the north-central part of the State, bounded on the north by Linn and Macon ‘I Counties; east by Macon and Randolph Counties; south by Howard County and the Missouri River, which separates it from Saline County- and on the west by Grand River, which separates it from Carroll and Livingston Counties. The first white mento visit the section nowChariton County were venturesome French fur traders. The exact date of their entry into the county is not known, but some of them had madetrips as far as the Chariton River before the beginning of the nineteenth century. One of these traders was named Chariton or Charaton, and with his companionshe located his trading campabout a mile from the Missouri River, near the mouth of the stream which, after him, was called Chariton River. In the journal of Lewisand Clark it is stated that on June 10, 180k, while ascending the Missouri River on their famous expedition, they passed the mouthof Big and Little Chariton Rivers, both of which at that time had separate outlets into the Missouri. Since then the erosion by the high waters has caused both streams to unite about a mile from the Missouri River. The Indians who resided in the county when the white menfirst settled in it had a tradition that at the forks of the Chariton Rivers was a large lake which was one of the favorite fishing places of their ancestors.
    [Show full text]
  • Bed Monitoring at the Chariton and Mississippi Rivers in Missouri 2007–09
    Organ izational Results Research Report January 2010 OR10.015 Real-Time River Channel- Bed Monitoring at the Chariton and Mississippi Rivers in Missouri 2007–09 Prepared by United States Geological Survey and Missouri Department of Transportation Final Report RI08-002 IBRD Sonar Scour Monitoring Project: Real-Time River Channel-Bed Monitoring at the Chariton and Mississippi Rivers in Missouri, 2007-09 Prepared for Missouri Department of Transportation Organizational Results by Paul H. Rydlund, Jr. USGS January 2010 The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the principal investigators and the Missouri Department of Transportation. They are not necessarily those of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard or regulation. TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE. 1. Report No.: 2. Government Accession No.: 3. Recipient's Catalog No.: OR10-015 4. Title and Subtitle: 5. Report Date: IBRD Sonar Scour Monitoring Project: Real-Time River Channel-Bed January 2010 Monitoring at the Chariton and Mississippi Rivers in Missouri, 2007-09 6. Performing Organization Code: 7. Author(s): 8. Performing Organization Report Paul H. Rydlund, Jr No.: RI08-002 9. Performing Organization Name and Address: 10. Work Unit No.: USGS 1400 Independence Road 11. Contract or Grant No.: Rolla, MO 65401 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address: 13. Type of Report and Period Covered: Missouri Department of Transportation Final Report. Organizational Results 14. Sponsoring Agency Code: PO BOX 270, JEFFERSON CITY MO 65102 15. Supplementary Notes: The investigation was conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.
    [Show full text]
  • IAC 7/2/08 Natural Resource Commission[571] Ch 49, P.1
    IAC 7/2/08 Natural Resource Commission[571] Ch 49, p.1 CHAPTER 49 OPERATION OF MOTOR VEHICLES IN MEANDERED STREAMS, NAVIGABLE STREAMS AND TROUT STREAMS 571—49.1(462A) Purpose and intent. This chapter implements Iowa Code section 462A.34A and identifies meandered streams, trout streams, and navigable streams in which motor vehicles may not be operated. 571—49.2(462A) Definitions. “Department” means the department of natural resources. “Meandered stream” means a lake or stream which at the time of the original government survey was so surveyed as to mark, plat and compute acreage of adjacent fractional sections. “Motor vehicle” means a vehicle which is self-propelled, but not including vehicles known as trackless trolleys which are propelled by electric power obtained from overhead trolley wires and are not operated upon rails. A motor vehicle is not a watercraft as defined in Iowa Code section 462A.2(32). “Navigable stream” means all streams which can support a vessel capable of carrying one or more persons during a total of a six-month period in one out of every ten years. “Trout stream” means a cold-water stream which, by natural or artificial methods, supports trout fish species. 571—49.3(462A) Stream identification process. 49.3(1) The names and locations of trout streams and navigable streams shall be provided by the department’s district fisheries supervisors to the administrator of the parks, recreation and preserves division and the administrator of the fish and wildlife division. 49.3(2) The division administrators of the fish and wildlife division and the parks, recreation and preserves division will provide a list of navigable streams and trout streams to the director for review.
    [Show full text]