This Is the Published Version: Available from Deakin Research Online

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

This Is the Published Version: Available from Deakin Research Online This is the published version: Hirst, Alistair J., Werner, Guy F., Heislers, Simon, White, Camille A. and Spooner, Daniel 2011, Port Phillip Bay annual trawl sub‐program milestone report no. 4. Department of Primary Industries, Queenscliff, Vic. Available from Deakin Research Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30059165 Reproduced with the kind permission of the copyright owner. Copyright : 2011, Department of Primary Industries Port Phillip Bay Annual Trawl Sub-Program Milestone Report No. 4 (2011) No. 139 July 2011 Port Phillip Bay Annual Trawl Sub- Program Milestone Report No. 4 (2011) Alastair J. Hirst, Guy F. Werner, Simon Heislers, Camille A. White and Daniel Spooner July 2011 Fisheries Victoria Technical Report Series No. 139 If you would like to receive this Copyright The State of Victoria, Department information/publication in an of Primary Industries, 2011. accessible format (such as large This publication is copyright. No part may be print or audio) please call the reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Customer Service Centre on: Copyright Act 1968. 136 186, TTY: 1800 122 969, Authorised by the Victorian Government, GPO or email Box 4440, Melbourne,Victoria 3001. [email protected] Printed by Fisheries Victoria, Queenscliff, Victoria Published: Fisheries Victoria Department of Primary Preferred way to cite: Industries, Queenscliff Centre PO Box 114, Hirst, A.J., Werner, G., Heislers, S., White, C.A, Queenscliff, Victoria 3225 Australia. and Spooner, D. (2011) Port Phillip Bay Annual Trawl Sub-Program Milestone Report No. 4 (2011). Fisheries Victoria Technical Report General disclaimer Series No. 139, July 2011. Department of This publication may be of assistance to you but Primary Industries, Queenscliff, Victoria, the State of Victoria and its employees do not Australia. 52 pp. guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all ISSN 1835-4785 liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any ISBN information in this publication. ii Executive Summary The Port Phillip Bay (PPB) Annual Trawl Sub- in the intermediate and deep regions from Program of the Channel Deepening Baywide 2009 onwards. There was no change in the Monitoring Programs is a continuation of the rate of decline between 2004/05–07 and PPB Annual Trawl Program that has been 2008–11 in the shallow, intermediate and conducted by the Department of Primary deep regions. Industries, for the most part annually, since • Eastern shovelnose stingaree biomass, but 1990. This sub-program aims to detect trends in not abundance, in the west region was demersal fish communities in PPB at both detected to be significantly lower for the shorter and longer time scales. The specific period 2008–2011 compared to the objective is to detect interannual changes in the background period 2005–2007. abundance of all common fish in PPB outside of expected variability. Sand flathead was once the most abundant demersal fish species in Port Phillip Bay, but Fish populations typically vary in space and was only the 8 th most abundant species caught time. In a comparatively shallow bay like PPB, by the trawl in 2011. Between 2004 and 2011 fish stocks are expected to vary at annual, sand flathead biomass declined in all regions of multi-year and decadal time scales as Port Phillip Bay, except the west region for conditions change. This program comprises: which the statistical power to detect change is • A statistical test of expected variation to low. Sand flathead biomass in PPB has declined examine multi-year trends in fish by 85–90% in the shallow, intermediate and populations between the periods 2004/05– deep regions, and by 66% in the west region 2007 and 2008–2011, and since 2000. The analyses indicate this is a • Long-term analysis of trends in fish baywide phenomenon. populations for the period 1990–2011. The significant decline in sand flathead biomass This report incorporates the results of the and abundance in PPB is consistent with: annual trawl survey undertaken in March 2011 • A longer-term pattern of decline observed for four regions of PPB. The emphasis is on for PPB trawl catches linked to change analysis of biomass and abundance of four key points in 2000/2002, and attributed to the fish species (eastern shovelnose stingaree, sand absence of any significant recruitment for flathead, sparsely spotted stingaree and spiny this species since the mid 1990s gurnard). Additional analysis examining long- • Declining recreational catch rates for sand term trends was undertaken using Bayesian flathead during the period 2008–2010 change point analysis for the four key species, • Declining catch rates (catch per unit effort) plus three additional species (globefish, for the commercial sand flathead fishery in snapper and banjo ray) and total fish and PPB since the late 1980s. cephalopod biomass - for which there was high statistical power to detect temporal changes in Commercial sand flathead catches in PPB first biomass, for the period 1990–2011. decline in the 1960s, and the most recent survey data are consistent with a long-term decline Changes outside expected observed for PPB as a whole. variability: 2008–2011 The ecological implications of this decline are Biomass and abundance was within expected largely unknown. Sand flathead are predatory variability for all key species for the reporting fish that prey on small fish and decapods, and period 2008–11 compared with the background in turn, are preyed upon by larger predatory periods 2004–07 (for the deep and intermediate fish in PPB including banjo rays, yank flathead regions) and 2005–07 (for the shallow and west and sharks. regions), with the following exceptions: By comparison, the decline in biomass of • Sand flathead biomass and abundance were eastern shovelnose stingaree in the west region significantly lower than the background is likely to have had little impact on the period in the shallow region from 2011, and iii population status of this fish species in PPB have affected the net input of nutrients into because: PPB, and the way in which nutrients are stored and utilised by different biological components. • The pattern is localised and <5% of the stingaree population is estimated to reside Bayesian statistical analysis highlights a in the west region common change point reflecting either a step- • Stingaree populations in PPB were wise change, or a change in the trend, for augmented by strong recruitment events in catches following 2000. The timing of these 2007, 2008, 2010 and 2011. changes most closely correspond with the onset of major environmental changes in the Bay, Changes in fish communities: including the long-term drought which commenced in the late “90s. It also appears that 1990–2011 changes in fish biomass were not uniform The number, timing, and magnitude of changes across regions, and that over shorter time to demersal fish populations in PPB over the scales, variation in recruitment has also played last 20 years was analysed in time series using a role for some species. Bayesian change point analysis, whereas the The period 2008–2011 was characterised by spatial extent of changes within PPB was relative stability and the absence of any major examined by analysing fish populations within change points, with the exception of the regions that correspond primarily with changes continuing decline of sand flathead from 2000 in depth. onwards in PPB. Bayesian change point analysis, undertaken on time series from 1990–2011, confirmed Conclusions significant changes in the biomass of demersal Interannual variation for all fish species, except fish species. Change point may be either a step- eastern shovelnose stingaree in the west region change, which is an abrupt change in and sand flathead in the shallow, intermediate abundance; a trend-change, which is an abrupt and deep regions, were within expected change in the trend; or both. Change points variability for PPB during the reporting period were identified for: 2008-2011. • Sand flathead biomass in 2000 and 2004 in the deep; 2002 and 2006 in the intermediate The decline in eastern shovelnose stingaree region; and 2002 in the west region biomass in the west region has little ecological consequence for PPB as a whole. • Eastern shovelnose stingaree biomass in 2000 in the deep region The decline in sand flathead abundance and • Spiny gurnard biomass in 1992 for the west biomass in the shallow, intermediate and deep region, and in 2000 for the deep region regions between 2004–2007 and 2008–2011 • reflects an on-going trend in PPB that can be Snapper biomass in 2000 in the shallow traced back to 2000 for the trawl data and region possibly earlier using commercial fisheries • Total fish biomass in 2005 in the data. The ecological implications of this decline intermediate region. for PPB are largely unknown. No change points were identified for sparsely The contrasting biomass trends for two of the spotted stingaree, globefish or banjo ray most abundant and recreationally important populations in PPB from 1990 to 2011. fish species in PPB, sand flathead and snapper, over the last 2 decades can be partly explained All change points were associated with by variation in recruitment. Whereas, the sand reductions in biomass, with the exception of flathead population has not experienced snapper biomass in the shallow region which significant recruitment since 1993, snapper have increased after 2000. This finding is consistent with higher commercial and recreational catch experienced three major recruitment events rates for adult snapper in PPB from 2002 since 1998 that have augmented population numbers in PPB. The causes for these differing onwards. recruitment patterns remain unknown at the Demersal fish assemblages in PPB have present time. undergone significant changes over the past Fish biomass and abundance in the period two decades.
Recommended publications
  • Spatial Ecology and Fisheries Interactions of Rajidae in the Uk
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF NATURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ocean and Earth Sciences SPATIAL ECOLOGY AND FISHERIES INTERACTIONS OF RAJIDAE IN THE UK Samantha Jane Simpson Thesis for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY APRIL 2018 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON 1 2 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF NATURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ocean and Earth Sciences Doctor of Philosophy FINE-SCALE SPATIAL ECOLOGY AND FISHERIES INTERACTIONS OF RAJIDAE IN UK WATERS by Samantha Jane Simpson The spatial occurrence of a species is a fundamental part of its ecology, playing a role in shaping the evolution of its life history, driving population level processes and species interactions. Within this spatial occurrence, species may show a tendency to occupy areas with particular abiotic or biotic factors, known as a habitat association. In addition some species have the capacity to select preferred habitat at a particular time and, when species are sympatric, resource partitioning can allow their coexistence and reduce competition among them. The Rajidae (skate) are cryptic benthic mesopredators, which bury in the sediment for extended periods of time with some species inhabiting turbid coastal waters in higher latitudes. Consequently, identifying skate fine-scale spatial ecology is challenging and has lacked detailed study, despite them being commercially important species in the UK, as well as being at risk of population decline due to overfishing. This research aimed to examine the fine-scale spatial occurrence, habitat selection and resource partitioning among the four skates across a coastal area off Plymouth, UK, in the western English Channel. In addition, I investigated the interaction of Rajidae with commercial fisheries to determine if interactions between species were different and whether existing management measures are effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Assessment of Sustainability for Ecological Risk of Shark and Other
    Rapid assessment of sustainability for ecological risk of shark and other chondrichthyan bycatch species taken in the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery Terence I. Walker, John D. Stevens, J. Matias Braccini, Ross K. Daley, Charlie Huveneers, Sarah B. Irvine, Justin D. Bell, Javier Tovar‐Ávila, Fabian I. Trinnie, David T. Phillips, Michelle A. Treloar, Cynthia A. Awruck, Anne S. Gason, John Salini, and William C. Hamlett Project No. 2002/033 Rapid assessment of sustainability for ecological risk of shark and other chondrichthyan bycatch species taken in the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery Terence I. Walker, John D. Stevens, J. Matias Braccini, Ross K. Daley, Charlie Huveneers, Sarah B. Irvine, Justin D. Bell, Javier Tovar‐ Ávila, Fabian I. Trinnie, David T. Phillips, Michelle A. Treloar, Cynthia A. Awruck, Anne S. Gason, John Salini, and William C. Hamlett July 2008 Project Number 2002/033 Rapid assessment of sustainability for ecological risk of shark and other chondrichthyan bycatch species taken in the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery FRDC Report 2002/033 Terence I. Walker, John D. Stevens, J. Matias Braccini, Ross J. Daley, Charlie Huveneers, Sarah B. Irvine, Justin D. Bell, Javier Tovar‐ Ávila, Fabian I. Trinnie, David T. Phillips, Michelle A. Treloar, Cynthia A. Awruck, Anne S. Gason, John Salini, and Hamlett, W. C. Published by Department of Primary Industries, Fisheries Research Brand, Queenscliff, Victoria, 3225. © Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, and Fisheries Victoria. 2008 This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Longterm Shifts in Abundance and Distribution of a Temperate Fish Fauna
    Global Ecology and Biogeography, (Global Ecol. Biogeogr.) (2011) 20, 58–72 RESEARCH Long-term shifts in abundance and PAPER distribution of a temperate fish fauna: a response to climate change and fishing practicesgeb_575 58..72 Peter R. Last1,2*, William T. White1,2, Daniel C. Gledhill1,2, Alistair J. Hobday1,2, Rebecca Brown3, Graham J. Edgar3 and Gretta Pecl3 1Climate Adaptation Flagship, CSIRO Marine ABSTRACT and Atmospheric Research, GPO Box 1538, Aim South-eastern Australia is a climate change hotspot with well-documented Hobart TAS 7001, Australia, 2Wealth from Oceans Flagship, CSIRO Marine and recent changes in its physical marine environment. The impact on and temporal Atmospheric Research, GPO Box 1538, Hobart responses of the biota to change are less well understood, but appear to be due to TAS 7001, Australia, 3Tasmanian Aquaculture influences of climate, as well as the non-climate related past and continuing human and Fisheries Institute, Private Bag 49, Hobart impacts. We attempt to resolve the agents of change by examining major temporal TAS 7001, Australia and distributional shifts in the fish fauna and making a tentative attribution of causal factors. Location Temperate seas of south-eastern Australia. Methods Mixed data sources synthesized from published accounts, scientific surveys, spearfishing and angling competitions, commercial catches and underwa- ter photographic records, from the ‘late 1800s’ to the ‘present’, were examined to determine shifts in coastal fish distributions. Results Forty-five species, representing 27 families (about 30% of the inshore fish families occurring in the region), exhibited major distributional shifts thought to be climate related. These are distributed across the following categories: species previously rare or unlisted (12), with expanded ranges (23) and/or abundance increases (30), expanded populations in south-eastern Tasmania (16) and extra- limital vagrants (4).
    [Show full text]
  • To View Asset
    Baywide Monitoring of Key Fishery Species in Seagrass Beds Sub-Program Progress Report No. 5 (April 2010) Neil Hutchinson & Greg Jenkins June 2010 Fisheries Victoria Technical Report Series No. 101 If you would like to receive this Copyright The State of Victoria, Department of information/publication in an Primary Industries, 2010. accessible format (such as large This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance print or audio) please call the with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Customer Service Centre on: Authorised by the Victorian Government, GPO 136 186, TTY: 1800 122 969, Box 4440, Melbourne, VIC 3001 or email Printed by Fisheries Victoria, Queenscliff, [email protected] Victoria Published: Fisheries Victoria Hutchinson, N. and Jenkins, G. (2010). Baywide Department of Primary Monitoring of Key Fishery Species in Seagrass Industries, Queenscliff Centre Beds Sub-Program. Progress Report No. 5 (April PO Box 114, Queenscliff, Victoria 2010). Fisheries Victoria Technical Report Series 3225 Australia. No. 101, June 2010. Fisheries Victoria, Department of Primary Industries, Queenscliff, Victoria, Australia. 10 pp. General disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not ISSN 1835-4785 guarantee that the publication is without flaw of ISBN 978-1-74264-293-2 any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Baywide Monitoring of Key Fishery Species in Seagrass Beds Progress Report #5 ii Table of Contents List of Tables ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • True-Blue Aussie Sharks & Rays
    True-Blue Aussie Sharks & Rays Uniquely Australian species that need our help Campaign Overview What Can You Do? Australia is a global shark and ray “hotspot” 1. Sign the petition and ask the Australian with around one-quarter of the world’s shark Government to better protect uniquely and ray species calling our waters home. A Australian, endemic sharks and rays in total of 322 species are found in Australian Australia’s largest fishery waters, half of which are endemic – that is, they’re found nowhere else in the world (1). 2. Take the pledge to #GiveFlakeABreak and choose a sustainable fish instead of Sharks tend to get the most attention but shark meat next time you’re at the fish did you know that most of our ‘true-blue’ and chip shop. endemic Aussies are actually rays? Nearly three quarters (69%) of rays are unique to 3. Download GoodFish: Australia’s Australian waters compared to less than half Sustainable Seafood guide to help (39%) of shark species (1). Endemic species you choose sustainable alternatives. like the southern fiddler ray and the Australian It’s EEEasy: blacktip shark can be found in coastal shallows • Explore your sustainable seafood where we dive and snorkel, but the majority options using the GoodFish app. of our endemic species are found in the deep, dark waters ranging from 100 meters to over a • Enquire with your fishmonger about their kilometre below the waves! seafood options and ask questions like “What species of flathead is this and Sadly, Australia is also recognised as a global where does it come from?” hotspot of extinction risk for some of the world’s most unique sharks and rays.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Victorian FISH COUNT
    ReefWatch Great Victorian FISH COUNT Guide to the fish species This picture guide is meant to be used by participating Fish Count groups to hone their fish identification skills prior to their survey, or to help clear up confusion when discussing group findings. It cannot replace a good field book, but it may help you to recognise what these species look like in the water. If you’re not sure about a fish you saw, have a look in this booklet to see if the depth, habitat and description matches up with what you encountered on your snorkel or dive. If a fish only occurs in shallow waters within seagrass beds, you probably didn’t see it on a reef at 40 metres down. As always we encourage you to take as many photos as possible! Photos can be uploaded to the Atlas of Living Australia/Redmap to confirm sightings, especially of unusual species/species outside their known range, and can be used to help identify what your group discovered on the day. Contact fi[email protected] if you’d like to borrow an underwater camera for your event. Victorian National Parks Association Our vision is to ensure Victoria is a place with a diverse and healthy natural environment that is protected, respected and enjoyed by all. We work with all levels of government, the scientific community and the general community to achieve long term, best practice environmental outcomes and help shape the agenda for creating and managing national parks, conservation reserves and other important natural areas across About this guide land and sea in Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Final Report FRDC 2003/023
    Prawn Fishery By-catch and Discards: marine ecosystem analysis – population effects Ib Svane, Kate Rodda & Philip Thomas 2007 Project No. 2003/023 Prawn Fishery By-catch and Discards: marine ecosystem analysis – population effects Ib Svane, Kate Rodda & Philip Thomas 2007 Project No. 2003/023 SARDI Aquatic Sciences Publication No. RD 03-0132 SARDI Research Report Series No. 199 Principal Investigator Dr Ib Svane South Australian Research and Development Institute Aquatic Sciences Lincoln Marine Science Centre Hindmarsh Street, Port Lincoln SA 5606 Ph: +618 8683 2562 Fax: +618 8683 2520 Email: [email protected] COPYRIGHT © Fisheries Research and Development Corporation and SARDI, 2007. This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. DISCLAIMER Although SARDI has taken all reasonable care in preparing this report, neither SARDI nor its officers accept any liability resulting from the interpretation or use of the information set out in this document. Information contained in this document is subject to change without notice. SARDI Aquatic Sciences Publication No RD 03-0132 SARDI Research Report Series No. 199 ISBN: 0 7308 5361 6 Printed in Adelaide, March 2007 Authors: Ib Svane, Kate Rodda, Philip Thomas Reviewed by: J. Tanner and J. Carragher Approved by: J. Carragher Signed: Date: 21st March 2007 Distribution: PIRSA Fisheries, South Australian Fisheries Research Advisory Boards, WC&SGPFA, SARDI Aquatic Sciences Library, State Library, Parliamentary Library, National Library, SARDI Executive Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Key Species Groups in the East Marine Region
    Australian Museum Description of Key Species Groups in the East Marine Region Final Report – September 2007 1 Table of Contents Acronyms........................................................................................................................................ 3 List of Images ................................................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................ 6 2 Corals (Scleractinia)............................................................................................................ 12 3 Crustacea ............................................................................................................................. 24 4 Demersal Teleost Fish ........................................................................................................ 54 5 Echinodermata..................................................................................................................... 66 6 Marine Snakes ..................................................................................................................... 80 7 Marine Turtles...................................................................................................................... 95 8 Molluscs ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Praise Our Rays 2017 Great Victorian Fish Count
    PRAISE OUR RAYS 2017 GREAT VICTORIAN FISH COUNT TABATHA LOUGHNAN KADE MILLS CAITLIN GRIFFITH Victorian National Parks Association Our vision is to ensure Victoria is a place with a diverse and healthy natural environment that is protected, respected and enjoyed by all. We work with all levels of government, the scientific community and the general community to achieve long term, best practice environmental outcomes and help shape the agenda for creating and managing national parks, conservation reserves and other important natural areas across land and sea in Victoria. We are also Victoria’s largest bushwalking club and provide a range of education, citizen science and activity programs that encourage Victorians to get active for nature. ReefWatch ReefWatch is the Victorian National Parks Association’s marine citizen science program. It encourages divers and snorkelers to monitor marine life at their favourite dive sites. ReefWatch coordinates a number of marine conservation programs, including ‘OysterWatch’, ‘ReefCam’, Sea Slug Census and the Great Victorian Fish Count. In 2012, ReefWatch won an award for ‘Excellence in Education’ from the Victorian Coastal Council. Acknowledgements Parks Victoria: Mark Rodrigue, Stephen Tuohy, Jessica Strang, Pete Hay, Chris Hayward. CoastCare Victoria: Phillip Wierzbowski Museums Victoria and Redmap Victoria: Dianne Bray Atlas of Living Australia: Peter Brenton Participating groups: Academy of Scuba, Aquability, Australian Diving Instruction, Bellarine Snorkel Tours and Marine Education, Bunurong Coast
    [Show full text]
  • 01 Jones FB108(4).Indd
    365 Abstract—Commercial catches taken Species compositions of elasmobranchs in southwestern Australian waters by trawl fisheries targeting prawns caught by three different commercial fishing and scallops and from gillnet and longline fisheries targeting sharks methods off southwestern Australia, and were sampled at different times of biological data for four abundant bycatch species the year between 2002 and 2008. This sampling yielded 33 elasmobranch species representing 17 families. Ashlee A. Jones (contact author)1 Multivariate statistics elucidated Norman G. Hall1 the ways in which the species com- 1 positions of elasmobranchs differed Ian C. Potter among fishing methods and provided Email address for contact author: [email protected] benchmark data for detecting changes 1 Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research in the elasmobranch fauna in the Murdoch University future. Virtually all elasmobranchs Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia caught by trawling, which consisted predominantly of rays, were discarded as bycatch, as were approximately a quarter of the elasmobranchs caught by both gillnetting and longlining. The maximum lengths and the lengths at maturity of four abundant bycatch species, Heterodontus portusjacksoni, The impact of commercial fisheries amount of bycatch (Cook, 2003) and Aptychotrema vincentiana, Squatina on the populations of sharks and rays that the mortality of individuals in australis, and Myliobatis australis, has, in recent years, become an issue that bycatch is substantial (Bonfil, were greater
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a System of Ecologically Representative Marine Protected Areas in South Australian Bioregions Technical Report
    About this Report This report contains an overview of the framework and background related to the development of an ecologically-representative system of marine protected areas (MPAs) in South Australian marine bioregions, based upon the CAR principles (comprehensiveness, adequacy, representativeness) advocated by the Commonwealth for the future development of MPAs in Australian States and Territories. The report discusses the approach that was undertaken during the early 2000s, to (i) develop the scientific principles underlying a bioregional, ecologically-representative system of marine protected areas, and (ii) identify and document a list of areas and their attributes that would make a substantial contribution to that system. Citation This publication may be cited as: Baker, J. L. (2004). Towards a System of Ecologically Representative Marine Protected Areas in South Australian Marine Bioregions - Technical Report. Prepared for Coast and Marine Conservation Branch, Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia. Table of Contents Table of Figures ____________________________________________________________ iv Table of Tables _____________________________________________________________ v Foreword __________________________________________________________________ vi Acknowledgments _________________________________________________________ vii Executive Summary ________________________________________________________ viii 1 Marine Protected Areas_______________________________________________ 1 1.1 Definition and Purpose ____________________________________________________________1
    [Show full text]
  • Download 2018 Report
    Our vision is to ensure Victoria is a place with a diverse and healthy natural environment that is protected, respected and enjoyed by all. We work with all levels of government, the scientific community and the general community to achieve long term, best practice environmental outcomes and help shape the agenda for creating and managing national parks, conservation reserves and other important natural areas across land and sea in Victoria. We are also Victoria’s largest bushwalking club and provide a range of education, citizen science and activity programs that encourage Victorians to get active for nature. ReefWatch is the Victorian National Parks Association’s marine citizen science program. It encourages divers and snorkelers to monitor marine life at their favourite dive sites. ReefWatch coordinates a number of marine conservation programs, including ‘OysterWatch’, ‘ReefCam’, the Melbourne Sea Slug Census, ‘Dragon Quest’ and the Great Victorian Fish Count. In 2012, ReefWatch won an award for ‘Excellence in Education’ from the Victorian Coastal Council. Parks Victoria: Mark Rodrigue, Stephen Tuohy, Pete Hay, Nicole Filby, Emily Verey, Thierry Rolland CoastCare Victoria: Phillip Wierzbowski Museums Victoria and Redmap Victoria: Dianne Bray Atlas of Living Australia: Peter Brenton Participating groups: Academy of Scuba, Aquatic Adventures, Australian Diving Instruction, Bayplay, Daktari Surf/Dive, Dive and Dive, Dive La Trobe, Dive2U, Diveline, Friends of Barwon Bluff, Friends of Beware Reef, Friends of Eagle Rock Marine Sanctuary,
    [Show full text]