AN EVALUATION of ANODE CORROSION and GAS EMISSIONS DURING GOLD ELECTROWINNING by Amy Jo Chambers a Thesis Submitted to the Facu

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AN EVALUATION of ANODE CORROSION and GAS EMISSIONS DURING GOLD ELECTROWINNING by Amy Jo Chambers a Thesis Submitted to the Facu AN EVALUATION OF ANODE CORROSION AND GAS EMISSIONS DURING GOLD ELECTROWINNING by Amy Jo Chambers A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Metallurgical Engineering The University of Utah May 2014 Copyright © Amy Jo Chambers 2014 All Rights Reserved T h e University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL The thesis of Amy Jo Chambers has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: Michael L. Free , Chair Oct. 21, 2013 Date Approved Sivaraman Guruswamy , Member Oct. 21, 2013 Date Approved Sanja Miskovic , Member Oct. 21, 2013 Date Approved and by Manoranjan Misra , Chair/Dean of the Department/College/School of Metallurgical Engineering and by David B. Kieda, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT Gold is an important metal for a variety of uses and applications. A primary method of refining gold is electrowinning; it is used throughout the world and is becoming more and more common not only for gold processing but for other metals as well. To better understand and mitigate the negative effects of gold electrowinning, specifically anode corrosion and emissions, the effects of electrolyte composition (cyanide, chloride, hydroxide, sulfate and silicate), current density, and temperature in electrowinning cells were examined. Stainless steel electrodes were used. The emissions for gold electrowinning were also studied; specifically, ammonia and hydrogen cyanide gas evolution were examined while varying temperature, current density, and concentration of cyanide and hydroxide. The data indicate that the greatest cause of increased anode corrosion rate is temperature. Lower temperatures examined did not cause significant corrosion except in one anode which had high cyanide and high silica. Silica is often used as a corrosion inhibitor and at low concentrations large corrosion rates were not observed, however, very high corrosion rates were observed with high concentrations of silica. At high temperature the greatest contributor to increased corrosion rate was large amounts of silica in the electrolyte. Low ion concentrations in the electrolyte showed sulfate as the greatest contributor to corrosion rate. Cyanide concentration had a small effect on corrosion rate. Corrosion was observed at varied current density, chloride, and hydroxide, however, there was not a significant linear relationship. Significant pitting was observed in the anodes exposed to high levels of chloride. The amount of ammonia evolved from the electrowinning cell was found to be directly proportional to the amount of cyanide loss in any given test. The largest contributor to cyanide destruction was temperature and cyanide concentration. The effects of hydroxide and current density were small and not statistically significant. The evolution of hydrogen cyanide was found to be negligible. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………...iii LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………...vii LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………………...x ACKNOWLEDGMENTS……………………………………………………………….xii 1 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………...1 1.1 Background………………………………………………………………………..1 1.2 Electrowinning…………………………………………………………………….3 1.3 Corrosion…………………………………………………………………………..5 1.4 Emissions…...........................................................................................................12 2 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES…………………………………………….21 2.1 Anode Corrosion Experiments…………………………………………………...21 2.2 Emissions Tests…………………………………………………………………..24 3 RESULTS………………………………………………………………………..30 3.1 Anode Corrosion………….……………………………………………………30 3.1.1 Effect of NaCN on Anode Corrosion……………...…………….………..….30 3.1.2 Effect of NaCl on Anode Corrosion…............….............……………...........31 3.1.3 Effect of Na2SO4 on Anode Corrosion………………….……………...…...31 3.1.4 Effect of NaOH on Anode Corrosion...………………….…………………..32 3.1.5 Effect of Na2SiO3 and Current Density on Anode Corrosion...………….....32 3.1.6 Effect of Lower Temperature (71° C) on Anode Corrosion...……….………33 3.1.7 Effect of Low Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 on Anode Corrosion..………………..33 3.1.8 Intermediate Temperature Anode Testing...……………….………………...33 3.1.9 Low and Mixed Na2SiO3 and Na2SO4 Anodes......................................…...34 3.2 Emissions Testing……………………………..………………………………..34 4 DISCUSSION……………………………………………………………………53 4.1 Anode Corrosion……………………………………….………………………53 4.1.1 Effect of NaCN……………………………………………..………………..53 4.1.2 Effect of NaCl…………………………………………………..……………54 4.1.3 Effect of NaOH……………………………………………………...……….54 4.1.4 Effect of Current Density……..……………………………………………...55 4.1.5 Effect of Silica..……………………………………………………………...56 4.1.6 Effect of Sulfate...……………………………………………………………56 4.1.7 Effect of Mixed Sulfate and Silica..………………………………………….57 4.1.8 Effect of Temperature…..……………………………………………………58 4.2 Emissions Tests..………………………………………………………………..58 4.2.1 Ammonia Emission and Cyanide Loss………………………………..……..58 4.2.2 Cyanide Concentration vs. Cyanide Loss..…………………………………..59 4.2.3 Hydroxide Concentration and Cyanide Loss……………..………………….60 4.2.4 Current Density and Cyanide Loss..…………………………………………60 5 CONCLUSIONS………………………………………………………………...71 APPENDIX……………………………………...……………………………………….73 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………..75 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: Time versus energy of metals (adapted from Chandler 1998). .................................. 19 1.2: Corrosion of an anode in electrowinning (adapted from Chandler 1998). ................ 19 2.1: Anode corrosion setup. .............................................................................................. 26 2.2: Electrode before testing. ............................................................................................ 26 2.3: Three hour sample of electrowinning cell voltage data. ............................................ 27 2.4: Graph constructed during cleaning of anode 18. ....................................................... 27 2.5: Determination of optimum flow rate. ........................................................................ 28 2.6: Complete emissions test setup. .................................................................................. 28 2.7: Electrowinning cell without secondary containment. ................................................ 29 3.1: Anodes 0-3 correspond to results in Table 3.1. ......................................................... 35 3.2: Anodes 4-7 correspond to data in Table 3.1. ............................................................. 35 3.3: High variability of cyanide concentration. ................................................................ 36 3.4: Stable control of cyanide concentration. .................................................................... 37 3.5: Voltage-time plot showing anodes 0 and 1 over a two week period. ........................ 38 3.6: Anodes 8-15 correspond to data presented in Table 3.2. ........................................... 39 3.7: Anode 13 magnified................................................................................................... 39 3.8: Anodes 16-23 correspond to data presented in Table 3.3. ......................................... 40 3.9: Large pitting observed in cross section of anode 23. ................................................. 40 3.10: Anodes 24-31 correspond to the data in Table 3.4. ................................................. 41 3.11: Anodes 32-35 correspond to data in Table 3.5. ....................................................... 42 3.12: Cross section of anode 35. ....................................................................................... 42 3.13: Anodes 36-38 correspond to data in Table 3.5. ....................................................... 43 3.14: Anodes tested in electrolyte containing Na2SO4 at 71°C. ....................................... 44 3.15: Cross section of anode 42. ....................................................................................... 44 3.16: Anodes 45-47 correspond to data in Table 3.6. ....................................................... 45 3.17: Anodes 48-55 correspond to data in Table 3.7. ....................................................... 46 3.18: Anodes 56-63 correspond to data in Table 3.8. ....................................................... 46 3.19: Anodes 64-71 correspond to data in Table 3.9. ....................................................... 47 4.1: Cyanide vs. corrosion, data taken from Table 3.1 and test 48 in Table 3.7. .............. 61 4.2: The relationship between chloride and corrosion, data taken from Table 3.2. .......... 61 4.3: NaOH vs. corrosion, data taken from Table 3.4. ....................................................... 62 4.4: Current density vs. corrosion, data taken from Tables 3.2 and 3.5. .......................... 62 4.5: The relationship of Na2SiO3 with corrosion, data from Tables 3.5, 3.7, 3.9. ............ 63 4.6: The effect of Na2SO4 on corrosion, data from Tables 3.3, 3.7, and 3.9. ................... 63 4.7: Na2SO4 concentration values less than 0.5 g/L, data from Tables 3.7 and 3.9. ......... 64 4.8: The effect of Na2SO4 and Na2SiO3, data from Tables 3.3, 3.5, 3.7, and 3.9. ............ 64 4.9: Na2SO4 at various temperatures, data from Tables 3.3 and 3.8. ................................ 65 4.10: Na2SiO3 corrosion rate compared to temperature, data from Tables 3.4 and 3.8 .... 65 4.11: Cyanide loss vs. ammonia capture for all tests, data from Table 3.11. ................... 66 4.12:
Recommended publications
  • History of the Chlor-Alkali Industry
    2 History of the Chlor-Alkali Industry During the last half of the 19th century, chlorine, used almost exclusively in the textile and paper industry, was made [1] by reacting manganese dioxide with hydrochloric acid 100–110◦C MnO2 + 4HCl −−−−−−→ MnCl2 + Cl2 + 2H2O (1) Recycling of manganese improved the overall process economics, and the process became known as the Weldon process [2]. In the 1860s, the Deacon process, which generated chlorine by direct catalytic oxidation of hydrochloric acid with air according to Eq. (2) was developed [3]. ◦ 450–460 C;CuCl2 cat. 4HCl + O2(air) −−−−−−−−−−−−−−→ 2Cl2 + 2H2O(2) The HCl required for reactions (1) and (2) was available from the manufacture of soda ash by the LeBlanc process [4,5]. H2SO4 + 2NaCl → Na2SO4 + 2HCl (3) Na2SO4 + CaCO3 + 2C → Na2CO3 + CaS + 2CO2 (4) Utilization of HCl from reaction (3) eliminated the major water and air pollution problems of the LeBlanc process and allowed the generation of chlorine. By 1900, the Weldon and Deacon processes generated enough chlorine for the production of about 150,000 tons per year of bleaching powder in England alone [6]. An important discovery during this period was the fact that steel is immune to attack by dry chlorine [7]. This permitted the first commercial production and distribu- tion of dry liquid chlorine by Badische Anilin-und-Soda Fabrik (BASF) of Germany in 1888 [8,9]. This technology, using H2SO4 for drying followed by compression of the gas and condensation by cooling, is much the same as is currently practiced. 17 “chap02” — 2005/5/2 — 09Brie:49 — page 17 — #1 18 CHAPTER 2 In the latter part of the 19th century, the Solvay process for caustic soda began to replace the LeBlanc process.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrowinning of Tellurium by Means of PLS Modelling
    2009:056 MASTER'S THESIS Optimisation of Influential Factors in Electrowinning of Tellurium by Means of PLS Modelling Seyed Mohammad Khosh Khoo Sany Luleå University of Technology Master Thesis, Continuation Courses Minerals and Metallurgical Engineering Department of Chemical Engineering and Geosciences Division of Process Metallurgy 2009:056 - ISSN: 1653-0187 - ISRN: LTU-PB-EX--09/056--SE Optimisation of Influential Factors in Electrowinning of Tellurium by Means of PLS Modelling Master Thesis By: Seyed Mohammad Khoshkhoo Sany [email protected] Supervisors: Prof. Åke Sandström (Luleå University of Technology) Dr. Nils Johan Bolin (Boliden Mineral AB) Abstract Electrowinning of tellurium is a relatively simple process that can be carried out effectively by employing the existing technology. In order to obtain tellurium with the least amount of impurities, the effects of three main factors were studied, namely current density, free concentration of caustic soda and initial concentration of tellurium. Five elements were chosen as the main impurities: Ag, Bi, Cd, Ni and Pb. A series of 17 experiments arranged in a CCF (central composite faced-centred) design has been carried out and the results were fitted using PLS (partial least squares) method. The effect of free caustic concentration was found to be the most important of the three parameters studied. Current density was also important, yielding the least amount of impurities at high current densities. Tellurium concentration had the smallest effect of the three parameters studied. From the model, current densities of 330-350 A/m2, tellurium concentrations of 90-120 g/l and free sodium hydroxide concentration of around 120 g/l are suggested as optimal conditions for obtaining the purest tellurium.
    [Show full text]
  • Membraneless Electrolyzers for Solar Fuels Production
    Membraneless Electrolyzers for Solar Fuels Production Jonathan T. Davis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Columbia University 2019 © 2019 Jonathan T. Davis All rights reserved ABSTRACT Membraneless electrolyzers for solar fuels production Jonathan “Jack” Davis Solar energy has the potential to meet all of society’s energy demands, but challenges remain in storing it for times when the sun is not shining. Electrolysis is a promising means of energy storage which applies solar-derived electricity to drive the production of chemical fuels. These so-called solar fuels, such as hydrogen gas produced from water electrolysis, can be fed back to the grid for electricity generation or used directly as a fuel in the transportation sector. Solar fuels can be generated by coupling a photovoltaic (PV) cell to an electrolyzer, or by directly converting light to chemical energy using a photoelectrochemical cell (PEC). Presently, both PV- electrolyzers and PECs have prohibitively high capital costs which prevent them from generating hydrogen at competitive prices. This dissertation explores the design of membraneless electrolyzers and PECs in order to simplify their design and decrease their overall capital costs. A membraneless water electrolyzer can operate with as few as three components: A cathode for the hydrogen evolution reaction, an anode for the oxygen evolution reaction, and a chassis for managing the flows of a liquid electrolyte and the product gas streams. Absent from this device is an ionically conducting membrane, a key component in a conventional polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) electrolyzer that typically serves as a physical barrier for separating product gases generated at the anode and cathode.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy and Exergy Analyses of Different Aluminum Reduction Technologies
    sustainability Article Energy and Exergy Analyses of Different Aluminum Reduction Technologies Mazin Obaidat 1, Ahmed Al-Ghandoor 1, Patrick Phelan 2, Rene Villalobos 2 and Ammar Alkhalidi 3,* ID 1 Department of Industrial Engineering, The Hashemite University, Az-Zarqa 13133, Jordan; [email protected] (M.O.); [email protected] (A.A.-G.) 2 Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA; [email protected] (P.P.); [email protected] (R.V.) 3 Energy Engineering Department, German Jordanian University, Amman 11180, Jordan * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +962-7-9611-2506 Received: 23 February 2018; Accepted: 11 April 2018; Published: 17 April 2018 Abstract: This paper examines and compares different aluminum reduction technologies found in the literature as alternatives to the current Hall–Heroult technology. The main inefficiencies in the current Hall–Heroult technology were identified and the advantages of the different proposed technologies over the Hall–Heroult technology were determined. The comparison between the different technologies, namely Hall–Heroult, wetted drained cathode, inert anode, and carbothermic, was based on energy and material requirements, and environmental impact. In order to combine all of the evaluation criteria into one numerical value, the exergy concept was utilized as a decision tool. The results emphasize that in order to analyze any conversion system, the exergy of energy, material, environmental impact, and their associated chain production should be taken into consideration. Keywords: exergy; aluminum; Hall–Heroult; inert anode; wetted drained cathode; carbothermic 1. Introduction Aluminum’s unique properties of low density and corrosion resistance make it a very important metal and a metal of choice to modern manufacturing.
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTROWINNING of TITANIUM from TITANIUM TETRACHLORIDE: PILOT PLANT EXPERIENCE and PRODUCTION PLANT PROJECTIONS George Gobel, Jo
    ELECTROWINNING OF TITANIUM FROM TITANIUM TETRACHLORIDE: PILOT PLANT EXPERIENCE AND PRODUCTION PLANT PROJECTIONS George Gobel, John Fisher and Linden E. Snyder The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan Howmet Turbine Components Corporation, Whitehall, Michigan Introduction High purity electrolytic titanium is being successfully produced on a pilot plant basis by D-H Titanium Company, a joint venture of The Dow Chemical Company and Howmet Turbine Components Corporation. The technology is an out­ growth of work originating at the U.S. Bureau· of Mines, Boulder City, Nevada. [l] The project is aimed at commercialization of this prior bench-scale research. Full-scale prot_otype components are being operated in a single ,anode 5,000 AMP cell producing approximately 45 kg./day of metal. Construction of industrial scale multiple anode cells is presently'underway that will culminate in opera­ tion of a one half to one million kg. per year demonstration plant in 1981. Previous research in the field has been extensive. Major efforts at prototype scale-up have been conducted by the New Jersey Zinc Co. (2 land Titanium Metals Corporation o.f America. [3] In both processes the diaphragm, which is required to ~nable selective oxidation of the chloride ion, was generated in the cell. A substantial fraction of the cathodic current was directed to a screen or perforate plate that divided the cell into anolyte and catholyte areas. As metal deposited restricting the plate openings an efficient semipermeable membrane was set-up which excluded Ti+2, Ti+3 interactions at the anode and cathode. High purity titanium was produced by both companies, how­ ever, the methods employed had several 'inherent shortcomings.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Impurities in Copper Electrometallurgy
    Scholars' Mine Masters Theses Student Theses and Dissertations 2015 Understanding Impurities in copper electrometallurgy Paul Laforest Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses Part of the Metallurgy Commons Department: Recommended Citation Laforest, Paul, "Understanding Impurities in copper electrometallurgy" (2015). Masters Theses. 7704. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/7704 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNDERSTANDING IMPURITIES IN COPPER ELECTROMETALLURGICAL PROCESSES By PAUL LAFOREST A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE IN METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING 2015 Approved by Michael S. Moats, Advisor F. Scott Miller Matthew J. O’Keefe © 2015 Paul Laforest All Rights Reserved iii PUBLICATION THESIS OPTION Paper I (14-25) in this thesis was prepared in a format to be submitted to Hydroprocess 2015. Paper II (26-46) was prepared in a format to be submitted to Copper 2016. iv ABSTRACT This work involves examining two industrial reports of methods to handle impurities in copper electrowinning and electrorefining. The first part evaluates the addition of Hydrostar, Cyquest N-900, DXG-F7, and Guartec EW to copper electrowinning electrolyte to affect MnO2 deposition on coated titanium anodes (CTAs). The second part examines the effects of anode chemistry and thiourea addition on the ductility of electrorefined copper starter sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrolysis of Water - Wikipedia 1 of 15
    Electrolysis of water - Wikipedia 1 of 15 Electrolysis of water Electrolysis of water is the decomposition of water into oxygen and hydrogen gas due to the passage of an electric current. This technique can be used to make hydrogen gas, a main component of hydrogen fuel, and breathable oxygen gas, or can mix the two into oxyhydrogen, which is also usable as fuel, though more volatile and dangerous. It is also called water splitting. It ideally requires a potential difference of 1.23 volts to split water. Simple setup for demonstration of Contents electrolysis of water at home History Principle Equations Thermodynamics Electrolyte selection Electrolyte for water electrolysis Pure water electrolysis Techniques Fundamental demonstration Hofmann voltameter Industrial High-pressure High-temperature An AA battery in a glass of tap water Alkaline water with salt showing hydrogen Polymer electrolyte membrane produced at the negative terminal Nickel/iron Nanogap electrochemical cells Applications Efficiency Industrial output Overpotential Thermodynamics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolysis_of_water Electrolysis of water - Wikipedia 2 of 15 See also References External links History Jan Rudolph Deiman and Adriaan Paets van Troostwijk used, in 1789, an electrostatic machine to make electricity which was discharged on gold electrodes in a Leyden jar with water.[1] In 1800 Alessandro Volta invented the voltaic pile, and a few weeks later the English scientists William Nicholson and Anthony Carlisle used it for the electrolysis of water. In 1806
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Electrolytic Processes
    5. Electrolytic Processes 5.1 Introduction • The fact that electrical energy can produce chemical changes and the processes based on it, called the “electrolytic processes”, are widely used for extraction of pure metals from their ores (such as aluminum, zinc, copper, magnesium, sodium etc.), manufacturing of various chemicals (such as caustic soda, potassium permanganate, hydrogen, oxygen, chlorine etc.), electro deposition of metals including electroplating, electrotyping, electroforming, building up of worn-out parts in metallurgical, chemical and other industries. 5.2 Principle of electrolysis • As discussed in the definition of electrolyte, whenever any electrolyte gets dissolved in water, its molecules split into cations and anions moving freely in the electrolytic solution. • Now two metal rods are immersed in the solution and an electrical potential difference applied between the rods externally preferably by a battery. These partly immersed rods are technically referred as electrodes. • The electrode connected with negative terminal of the battery is known as cathode and the electrode connected with positive terminal of the battery is known as anode. • The freely moving positively charged cations are attracted by cathode and negatively charged anions are attracted by anode. - e- e Battery Impure Copper Pure Copper C A a n t SO4- o Cu+ h d + o SO4- Cu e Cu+ d e Cu+ Electrolyte (CuSO4) Impurities Figure 5.1 Electrolysis Prof. Rajan Detroja, EE Department Utilization of Electrical Energy and Traction (2160907) 1 5. Electrolytic Processes • In cathode, the positive cations take electrons from negative cathode and in anode, negative anions give electrons to the positive anode. For continually taking and giving electrons in cathode and anode respectively, there must be flow of electrons in the external circuit of the electrolytic.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrolytic Concentration of Caustic Soda Carl Rene Vander Linden Iowa State College
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1950 Electrolytic concentration of caustic soda Carl Rene Vander Linden Iowa State College Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Chemical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Vander Linden, Carl Rene, "Electrolytic concentration of caustic soda " (1950). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 14031. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/14031 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overiaps.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anode Process in Cobalt Electrowinning Torjus Åkre 1, Geir
    The Anode Process in Cobalt Electrowinning 1. R.R. Moskalyk, A.M. Alfantazi, Review of Present Cobalt Recovery Practice, Minerals & Metallurgical Torjus Åkre 1, Geir Martin Haarberg 1, Processing, vol. 17, 4, 2000, pp. 205-216. Sarbjyot Haarberg 2, Jomar Thonstad 1, 2. O. Forsén, J. Aromaa, Possibilities to Lower Energy Ole Morten Dotterud 3 Use in Electrowinning by Modification of Lead Anodes, Aqueous Electrotechnologies: Progress in 1 Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Theory and Practice, D.B. Dreisinger, ed., The Department of Materials Technology, Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 1997, pp. 333- NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway 346. 3. T. Robinson et al., Copper Electrowinning – 2003 2 SINTEF Materials and Chemistry, World Tankhouse Operating Data, Copper 2003- NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway Cobre 2003, Copper Electrorefining and Electrowinning, J.E. Dutrizac, C.G. Clement, eds., 3 Falconbridge Nikkelverk A/S, vol. V, CIM, 2003, pp. 421-472. Service box 604, NO-4606 Kristiansand S, Norway 4. F. Grøntoft, Electrowinning Metal from Chloride Solution, U.S. Pat. 4,155,821, 1979. Industrial cobalt electrowinning is performed in sulphate or chloride based aqueous solutions /1/. The main anode reactions are oxygen and chlorine evolution respectively. Along with the gas formation, divalent cobalt ions are oxidized in both solutions, forming a cobalt(III) oxyhydroxide anode scale (CoOOH) by hydrolytic precipitation. In sulphate media, which is most widely used, alloyed lead is the predominant anode material. When using lead anodes, CoOOH deposition is advantageous, since the cobalt layer acts as a collector for lead corrosion particles, which will otherwise contaminate the cobalt product. Cobalt also shows a depolarizing effect on the Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Process Industrial Process
    INDUSTRIAL PROCESS INDUSTRIAL PROCESS SESSION 4 Electrolysis SESSION 4 Electrolysis Session 4 Electrolysis Illustration of an electrolysis apparatus used in a school laboratory. In chemistry and manufacturing, electrolysis is a method of using a direct electric current (DC) to drive an otherwise non-spontaneous chemical reaction. Electrolysis is commercially highly important as a stage in the separation of elements from naturally occurring sources such as ores using an electrolytic cell. The voltage that is needed for electrolysis to occur is called the decomposition potential. Contents 1 History 2 Overview o 2.1 Process of electrolysis o 2.2 Oxidation and reduction at the electrodes o 2.3 Energy changes during electrolysis o 2.4 Related techniques 3 Faraday's laws of electrolysis o 3.1 First law of electrolysis o 3.2 Second law of electrolysis 1 4 Industrial uses 5 Competing half-reactions in solution electrolysis 6 Electrolysis of water 7 Electrocrystallization 8 Experimenters History The word electrolysis comes from the Greek ἤλεκτρον [ lektron] "amber" and λύσις [lýsis] "dissolution". 1785 – Martinus van Marum's electrostatic generator was used to reduce tin, zinc, and antimony from their salts using electrolysis.[1] 1800 – William Nicholson and Anthony Carlisle (view also Johann Ritter), decomposed water into hydrogen and oxygen. 1807 – Potassium, sodium, barium, calcium and magnesium were discovered by Sir Humphry Davy using electrolysis. 1833 - Michael Faraday develops his two laws of electrolysis, and provides a mathematical
    [Show full text]
  • Electrolysis
    Electricity Current and the transport of charge Electrolysis DETERMINATION OF THE FARADAY CONSTANT Production of hydrogen by means of electrolysis and determining the volume of the hydrogen V. Determining the charge Q by measuring the current as a function of time I(t). Calculating the Faraday constant F. UE3020700 07/15 UD BASIC PRINCIPLES Electrolysis is the name given to the splitting or dissocia- tion of a chemical bond due to the action of an electric current. The process of electrical conduction is associat- ed with decomposition of the substance in question such that the charge transported Q and the quantity in moles n of material which has undergone dissociation are propor- tional to one another. The constant of proportionality is called the Faraday constant F and is a fundamental phys- ical constant. To be more precise regarding the proportionality between the charge Q and the number of moles n of dissociated material, we actually need to take into account a multiplier z, the valen- cy number for the dissociated ions. The following is true: (1) Q F n z Once that quantity is known, the Faraday constant can there- fore be determined by measuring the charge Q and the num- ber of moles n involved in an electrolytic process. In this experiment, the electrolysis of water will cause a certain quantity of hydrogen and oxygen to be produced. In order to determine the quantity of charge Q transported during this process, the change in electric current over time I(t) will be measured and then the charge Q can be derived by integration: (2) Q I() t dt .
    [Show full text]