Description of “Ecological Subregions: Sections of the Conterminous United States”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Description of “Ecological Subregions: Sections of the Conterminous United States” United States Department of Description of “Ecological Agriculture Forest Service Subregions: Sections of Gen. Tech. Report WO-76B the Conterminous January 2007 United States” First Approximation Compiled by W. H. McNab, D. T. Cleland, J. A. Freeouf, J. E. Keys, Jr., G. J. Nowacki, and C. A. Carpenter Description of Ecological Subregions: Sections of the Conterminous United States Front Cover The U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service 2007 map “Ecological Subregions: Sections and Subsections of the Conterminous United States.” Sections, the largest ecological unit of the subregion planning scale of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service National Hierarchical Framework of Ecological Units, are shown nested within provinces, the smallest unit of the ecoregion level. Sections are delineated primarily by evaluation and integration of physical and biological components including climate, physiography, lithology, soils, and potential natural communities. Not shown on the front cover map are subsection ecological units, which are subdivisions of sections. Together, sections and subsections form subregions that may be used for planning and assessments at regional scales. (Map electronic file provided by Alyssa M. Sloan, Michigan Technological University.) Abstract Preliminary descriptions are presented for the 190 section ecological units delineated on the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service 2007 map “Ecological Subregions: Sections and Subsections of the Conterminous United States.” Brief descriptions of the section map units provide an abstract primarily of the climate, physiography, and geologic substrate that combine to form ecosystems with distinctive vegetation and other unique ecological characteristics. Many descriptions are illustrated with a photograph of the landform and vegetation found in the section. Compilers All compilers are affiliated with the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. W. Henry McNab is research forester, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC; David T. Cleland is landscape ecologist, Eastern Regional Office; Rhinelander, WI; Jerry A. Freeouf is regional soil scientist, Rocky Mountain Regional Office, Lakewood, CO; James E. Keys, Jr. is National Coordinator for Integrated Surveys, Washington Office, Washington, DC; Gregory J. Nowacki is regional ecologist, Eastern Regional Office, Milwaukee, WI; and Constance A. Carpenter is sustainable forests coordinator, Northeastern Area, State & Private Forestry, Durham, NH. Citation McNab, W.H.; Cleland, D.T.; Freeouf, J.A.; Keys, Jr., J.E.; Nowacki, G.J.; Carpenter, C.A., comps. 2007. Description of ecological subregions: sections of the conterminous United States [CD-ROM]. Gen. Tech. Report WO-76B. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 80 p. Back Cover Selected mammals that inhabit one or more section map units and influence ecological processes therein. (Photos: National Park Service and USDA Forest Service.) January 2007 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Ecosystem Management Coordination Washington, DC 20250 Description of Ecological Subregions: Sections of the Conterminous United States Description of “Ecological Subregions: Sections of the Conterminous United States” First Approximation Compiled by W. Henry McNab David T. Cleland Jerry A. Freeouf James E. Keys, Jr. Gregory J. Nowacki Constance A. Carpenter Description of Ecological Subregions: Sections of the Conterminous United States Preface Acknowledgments Photographs and descriptions presented in this document were obtained from several sources. Information for many descriptions and photographs were presented in a previous publication of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service, “Ecological Subregions of the United States: Section Descriptions” (McNab and Avers 1995). The compilers of this document acknowledge the contributions made by authors and photographers listed in the 1995 publication. A photograph supplements the description of about 80 percent of the sections. Many of the photographs in this document were used to illustrate another USDA Forest Service publication, General Technical Report (GTR) NE-321, “Experimental Forests and Ranges of the USDA Forest Service” (Adams et al. 2004). These photographs are identified as GTR NE-321, USDA Forest Service. We thank primary compiler M.B. Adams for providing those photographs, which she had obtained from other USDA Forest Service personnel. As a participant in the NE-321 publication, Andrew Youngblood of the Pacific Northwest Research Station provided additional photographs from his collection. Also, many photographs were obtained from Internet Web pages of agencies of the U.S. Government, including the Department of agriculture (Agricultural Research Service, Forest Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil and Water Conservation Districts); Department of Commerce (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration); and Department of Interior (National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service). Photographs from these agencies are in the public domain and the source of each was referenced. Additional photographs were provided by resource managers and specialists associated with State conservation organizations, by compilers of this document, and by other individuals who provided written permission allowing their use. Each photograph was the best available at the time this first approximation report was prepared, although the landscape depicted and quality, such as composition and resolution, of some was less than desired. Poor-quality and unrepresentative photographs will be replaced when better images become available. Disclaimer The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. Considerable other descriptive information was available for these ecosystems, particularly for soil, natural disturbances, and vegetation; it could not be utilized, however, due to the limited time and resources available for preparation of this first approximation report. Printing this electronic report This report is available only in electronic form as one of several data, graphic, or text documents recorded on a CD-ROM that collectively comprise the 2007 USDA Forest Service publication General Technical Report WO-76: "Ecological Subregions: Sections and Subsections of the Conterminous United States." The report is formatted as a conventional USDA Forest Service printed publication, including the front and back cover. It is distributed as an electronic file in Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To view and print this publication, you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available at no cost via the Internet from Adobe Systems, Inc. A conventional paper copy of this electronic publication may be obtained by printing the PDF file on both sides of paper measuring 8.5 by 11 inches, and binding. Description of Ecological Subregions: Sections of the Conterminous United States Contents Overview ........................................................................................................................1 211-Northeastern Mixed Forest Province.................................................................... 4 211A-Aroostook Hills and Lowlands Section ............................................................... 4 211B-Maine-New Brunswick Foothills and Lowlands Section ..................................... 4 211C-Fundy Coastal and Interior Section.................................................................... 4 211D-Central Maine Coastal and Embayment Section................................................ 4 211E-St. Lawrence and Champlain Valley Section ..................................................... 4 211F-Northern Glaciated Allegheny Plateau Section................................................... 4 211G-Northern Unglaciated Allegheny Plateau Section .............................................. 5 211I-Catskill Mountains Section .................................................................................. 5 211J-Tug Hill Plateau-Mohawk Valley Section ............................................................ 5 212-Laurentian Mixed Forest Province........................................................................ 5 212H-Northern Lower Peninsula Section..................................................................... 5 212J-Southern Superior Uplands Section.................................................................... 5 212K-Western Superior Uplands Section .................................................................... 6 212L-Northern Superior Uplands Section.................................................................... 6 212M-Northern Minnesota and Ontario Section .......................................................... 6 212N-Northern Minnesota Drift and Lake Plains Section............................................. 6 212Q-North Central Wisconsin Uplands Section ......................................................... 6 212R-Eastern Upper Peninsula Section ...................................................................... 7 212S-Northern Upper Peninsula Section..................................................................... 7 212T-Northern Green Bay Lobe Section ....................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Awards Ceremony
    South’s BEST 2019 Final Results BEST Award Winners: 1st Place: 966 Starkville High School (Mississippi BEST) 2nd Place: 1351 Ridgecrest Christian Academy (Wiregrass BEST) 3rd Place: 607 Eastwood/Cornerstone Schools (Montgomery BEST) Game Winners: 1st Place Robotics: 966 Starkville High School (Mississippi BEST) 2nd Place Robotics: 873 MACH (Jubilee BEST) 3rd Place Robotics: 803 DARC (Tennessee Valley BEST) 4th Place Robotics (finalist): 1351 Ridgecrest Christian Academy (Wiregrass BEST) Middle School Awards: Top ranking middle school in the BEST Award competition: Woodlawn Beach Middle School (Team 1112 - Emerald Coast BEST) Top ranking middle school in the Robotics competition: Semmes Middle School (Team 881 – Jubilee BEST) The Briggs and Stratton Teacher Leadership Award • Kevin Welch from 1042 Stewarts Creek Middle School (Music City BEST) • Amy Sterling from 1564 Moulton Middle/Lawrence Co. High School (Northwest Alabama BEST) • Beth Lee from 1805 Davis-Emerson Middle School (Shelton State BEST) South’s BEST Volunteer Award • Abigail Madden • Kate Kramer • Beth Rominger (Shelton State BEST) Jim Westmoreland Memorial Judge’s Award • Louis Feirman (Jubilee BEST) 1 BEST Award Category Awards: Best Spirit and Sportsmanship Award: 1st Team: 867 Faith Academy (Jubilee BEST) 2nd Team: 1552 Brooks High School (Northwest Alabama BEST) 3rd Team: 966 Starkville High School (Mississippi BEST) Best Engineering Notebook Award: 1st Team: 851 W.P. Davidson High School (Jubilee BEST) 2nd Team: 1653 Fort Payne High School (Northeast Alabama BEST) 3rd
    [Show full text]
  • Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas in New York
    R L NS Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas in New York State Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin MLRA Explorer Custom Report L - Lake State Fruit, Truck Crop, and Dairy Region 101 - Ontario-Erie Plain and Finger Lakes Region M - Central Feed Grains and Livestock Region 111E - Indiana and Ohio Till Plain, Eastern Part 111B - Indiana and Ohio Till Plain, Northeastern Part R - Northeastern Forage and Forest Region 144B - New England and Eastern New York Upland, Northern Part 144A - New England and Eastern New York Upland, Southern Part 143 - Northeastern Mountains 142 - St. Lawrence-Champlain Plain 141 - Tughill Plateau 140 - Glaciated Allegheny Plateau and Catskill Mountains 139 - Lake Erie Glaciated Plateau Major Land Resource Regions Custom Report Page 1 Data Source: USDA Agriculture Handbook 296 (2006) 03/26/08 http://soils.usda.gov/MLRAExplorer L - Lake State Fruit, Truck Crop, and Dairy Region Figure L-1: Location of Land Resource Region L LRR Overview This region (shown in fig. L-1) is in Michigan (59 percent), New York (22 percent), Ohio (10 percent), Indiana (8 percent), and Illinois (1 percent). A very small part is in Pennsylvania. The region makes up 45,715 square miles (118,460 square kilometers). Typically, the land surface is a nearly level to gently sloping glaciated plain (fig. L-2). The average annual precipitation is typically 30 to 41 inches (760 to 1,040 millimeters), but it is 61 inches (1,550 millimeters) in the part of the region east of Lake Erie.
    [Show full text]
  • Pine Warbler Is Published Monthly, September Through May, by the Piney Woods Wildlife Society, Inc
    Preferences Piney Woods Wildlife Society - April Program "Kemp's Ridleys - Then and Now" by Carole Allen, Al Barr & Carlos Hernandez Ridley's Sea Turtle Don’t miss the April program presented by PWWS’ very own three sea turtle pioneers. Al Barr, Carlos Hernandez and Carole Allen will show historic photos at Rancho Nuevo, Mexico, of nesters when there were only a few hundred Kemp’s ridleys left. Their photos gave Carole the pictures she needed to talk to children and begin HEART (Help Endangered Animals-Ridley Turtles) in schools. Their stories of staying in tents on the beach with none of the comforts of home will be interesting and fun too. Be prepared to laugh! See you for sea turtles! Please join us on Wednesday, April 17, 2019. (Social time with snacks provided is at 6:30 p.m. and the meeting starts at 7 p.m. at the Big Stone Lodge at Dennis Johnston Park located at 709 Riley Fuzzel Road in Spring, Texas. Ridley Sea Turtle Eggs The Real "Leafbird" by Claire Moore Golden-fronted Leafbird in India. Photo by Mike O'Brien Here is another one of those stories that only birders will understand... We all have them! This is a picture of a real "leafbird". It's the green bird, somewhat out of focus in the center of this picture. Various Leafbird species occur in Asia... Prior to birding in Cambodia a few years ago when I saw the Golden-fronted Leafbird, I used to often say, "Never mind. It was just a LEAF bird..." Now, I can't say that anymore without thinking back to this beauty that I saw in Cambodia.
    [Show full text]
  • SW CASC Science Agenda 2013-2018
    Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Climate Science Center 2013 Strategic Science Agenda Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Relation of the Southwest Climate Science Center to the Stakeholder Advisory Committee and Partners 5 Climatic Context of the Southwest ............................................................................................................... 6 Vision ........................................................................................................................................................... 13 Guiding Principles ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Goals of the Southwest Climate Science Center ......................................................................................... 14 Leadership goal ............................................................................................................................ 14 Research goal ............................................................................................................................ 14 Synthesis goal ............................................................................................................................ 15 Critical Information Needs .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lake of the Ozarks Regional Housing Study Acknowledgments
    LAKE OF THE OZARKS REGIONAL HOUSING STUDY ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The project team would like to acknowledge the contributions of the residents of the Lake Region, who gave their time, ideas, and exper- tise for the creation of this plan. It is only with their assistance and direction the plan gained the depth necessary to truly represent the spirit of the Lake Region and it is with their commitment that the plan will be implemented. We would also like to thank the partner organizations, Lake of the Ozarks Regional Economic Development Council who financially sup- ported this study and provided their leadership. A special thanks to everyone involved. Project Manager LOREDC BOARD Roger Corbin Tim Jacobsen Jeana Woods COMMITTEE Jacob Neusche Kim Willey Corey ten Bensel Linda Conner Brent Depeé Colleen Richey Debbie Hurr Russell Clay Jeff Hancock Cary Patterson Lori Hoelscher Vicki Devine Dennis Croxton Vicki Brown Kevin McRoberts Stan Schultz Roger Corbin CONSULTING TEAM RDG Planning & Design Omaha and Des Moines www.RDGUSA.com CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 7 CHAPTER 2: PROFILE OF THE REGION 11 CHAPTER 3: CAMDEN COUNTY 49 CHAPTER 4: MORGAN COUNTY 79 CHAPTER 5: MILLER COUNTY 103 CHAPTER 6: LACLEDE COUNTY 127 CHAPTER 7: DEFINING HOUSING ISSUES / DIRECTIONS FORWARD 153 CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 LAKE OF THE OZARKS REGIONAL HOUSING STUDY | Introduction INTRODUCTION The Lake of the Ozarks Regional Housing Study represents an in-depth study of the housing conditions of the three counties that constitute the Lake of the Ozarks Regional Economic Development Council (LOREDC). This includes the counties of Camden, Miller, and Morgan and the commercial centers of Camdenton, Eldon, Lake Ozark, Osage Beach, and Versailles.
    [Show full text]
  • Zone 3 – Atlanta Regional Commission
    REGIONAL PROFILE ZONE 3 – ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION TABLE OF CONTENTS ZONE POPULATION ........................................................................................................ 2 RACIAL/ETHNIC COMPOSITION ..................................................................................... 2 MEDIAN ANNUAL INCOME ............................................................................................. 3 EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT ...................................................................................... 4 GEORGIA COMPETITIVENESS INITIATIVE REPORT .................................................... 10 RESOURCES .................................................................................................................. 11 This document is available electronically at: http://www.usg.edu/educational_access/complete_college_georgia/summit ZONE POPULATION 2011 Population 4,069,211 2025 Projected Population 5,807,337 Sources: U.S. Census, American Community Survey 2011 ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates, 5-year estimate Georgia Department of Labor, Area Labor Profile Report 2012 RACIAL/ETHNIC COMPOSITION Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey 2011 ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates, 5-year estimate 2 MEDIAN ANNUAL INCOME Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey 2010, Selected Economic Characteristics, 5-year estimate 3 EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATES SYSTEM NAME 2011 GRADUATION RATE (%) Decatur City 88.40 Buford City 82.32 Fayette 78.23 Cherokee 74.82 Cobb 73.35 Henry
    [Show full text]
  • East and Central Farming and Forest Region and Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region: 12 Lrrs N and S
    East and Central Farming and Forest Region and Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region: 12 LRRs N and S Brad D. Lee and John M. Kabrick 12.1 Introduction snowfall occurs annually in the Ozark Highlands, the Springfield Plateau, and the St. Francois Knobs and Basins The central, unglaciated US east of the Great Plains to the MLRAs. In the southern half of the region, snowfall is Atlantic coast corresponds to the area covered by LRR N uncommon. (East and Central Farming and Forest Region) and S (Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region). These regions roughly correspond to the Interior Highlands, Interior Plains, 12.2.2 Physiography Appalachian Highlands, and the Northern Coastal Plains. The topography of this region ranges from broad, gently rolling plains to steep mountains. In the northern portion of 12.2 The Interior Highlands this region, much of the Springfield Plateau and the Ozark Highlands is a dissected plateau that includes gently rolling The Interior Highlands occur within the western portion of plains to steeply sloping hills with narrow valleys. Karst LRR N and includes seven MLRAs including the Ozark topography is common and the region has numerous sink- Highlands (116A), the Springfield Plateau (116B), the St. holes, caves, dry stream valleys, and springs. The region also Francois Knobs and Basins (116C), the Boston Mountains includes many scenic spring-fed rivers and streams con- (117), Arkansas Valley and Ridges (118A and 118B), and taining clear, cold water (Fig. 12.2). The elevation ranges the Ouachita Mountains (119). This region comprises from 90 m in the southeastern side of the region and rises to 176,000 km2 in southern Missouri, northern and western over 520 m on the Springfield Plateau in the western portion Arkansas, and eastern Oklahoma (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee
    The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1620 . II • r ,j • • ~1 =1 i1 .. ·~ II .I '1 .ill ~ I ... ... II 'II .fi :. I !~ ...1 . ~ !,~ .,~ 'I ~ J ·-=· ..I ·~ tJ 1;1 .. II "'"l ,,'\. d • .... ·~ I 3: ... • J ·~ •• I -' -\1 - I =,. The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee By WILLIAM F. OUTERBRIDGE A highly dissected plateau with narrow valleys, steep slopes, narrow crested ridges, and landslides developed on flat-lying Pennsylvanian shales and subgraywacke sandstone during the past 1.5 million years U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1620 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1987 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Outerbridge, William F. The Logan Plateau, a young physiographic region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1620) Bibliography: p. 18. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1620 1. Geomorphology-Logan Plateau. I. Title. II. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1620 557.3 s [551.4'34'0975] 84-600132 [GB566.L6] CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Methods of study 3 Geomorphology 4 Stratigraphy 9 Structure 11 Surficial deposits 11 Distribution of residuum 11 Depth of weathering 11 Soils 11 Landslides 11 Derivative maps of the Logan Plateau and surrounding area 12 History of drainage development since late Tertiary time 13 Summary and conclusions 17 References cited 18 PLATES [Plates are in pocket] 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Landforms and Their Economic Significance MODULE - 2 Changing Face of the Earth 7 Notes MAJOR LANDFORMS and THEIR ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE
    Major Landforms and their Economic Significance MODULE - 2 Changing face of the Earth 7 Notes MAJOR LANDFORMS AND THEIR ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE You have learnt in the previous lesson that the landforms found on the earth’s surface are the result of interplay between internal and external forces. The soft rocks are easily worn down by these forces. While the relatively harder rocks are not so easily worn down. Therefore, rocks have a great influence on the landforms developed in an area. The internal forces are perpetually elevating the earth’s surface and the external forces about which you will study in the next lessons are constantly wearing down such elevations to make ,the surface level. This is how various landforms are formed by constant action of agents of gradation. These landforms are not only the physical features of the earth’s surface but also the basis of human civilization. The major landforms found on the earth’s surface are mountains, plateaus and plains. In this lesson, we will study the major landforms of the earth and their economic importance for us. OBJECTIVES After studying this lesson you will be able to : differentiate among the three major landforms found on the earth’s surface; explain the process of formation of various landforms with the help of illustrations; classify mountains on the basis of their mode of formation; discuss the usefulness of mountains to man; list different types of plateaus and describe their economic significance; GEOGRAPHY 121 MODULE - 2 Major Landforms and their Economic Significance Changing face of the Earth enumerate major types of plains and explain their influence on human life; locate major mountains, plateaus and plains on the outline map of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Plains Region the Coastal Plains Region Includes About One-Third of Texas
    TXSE_1_03_p046-067 11/21/02 4:29 PM Page 52 Identifying the Why It Matters Now 2 The landforms, waterways, trees, and plants give each subregion Four Regions of Texas its unique character. TERMS & NAMES OBJECTIVES MAIN IDEA subregion, Coastal Plains 1. Identify the location of each natural As you learned in Chapter 1, Texas region, escarpment, growing subregion of Texas. can be divided into four regions. season, North Central 2. Compare the regions and subregions Now you will see how the lands Plains region, steppe, Great of Texas. within each region can be further Plains region, aquifer, divided. By analyzing similarities Mountains and Basins and differences, we can further region classify Texas into 11 subregions. WHAT Would You Do? Imagine that you are a member of the Texas Film Commission. Your Write your response job is to persuade moviemakers to shoot their films in Texas. To do to Interact with History this, you must be able to direct them to a location that matches the in your Texas Notebook. setting of their story. Where in Texas might you send a film crew to shoot a horror movie about a mysterious forest creature? What if the movie were about rock climbers? What if it were about being stranded on an uninhabited planet? Explain your reasoning. Dividing Up Texas Natural regions are determined by physical geography features such as landforms, climate, and vegetation. Texas can be divided into four large natural regions: the Coastal Plains, North Central Plains, Great Plains, and Mountains and Basins regions. The first three natural regions subregion a smaller division can also be divided into smaller subregions.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Fil Copy
    NASA TECHNICAL NASA TM X-3511 MEMORANDUM CO >< CASE FIL COPY REPORTS OF PLANETARY GEOLOGY PROGRAM, 1976-1977 Compiled by Raymond Arvidson and Russell Wahmann Office of Space Science NASA Headquarters NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION • WASHINGTON, D. C. • MAY 1977 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. TMX3511 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date May 1977 6. Performing Organization Code REPORTS OF PLANETARY GEOLOGY PROGRAM, 1976-1977 SL 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Compiled by Raymond Arvidson and Russell Wahmann 10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address Office of Space Science 11. Contract or Grant No. Lunar and Planetary Programs Planetary Geology Program 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Technical Memorandum National Aeronautics and Space Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20546 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract A compilation of abstracts of reports which summarizes work conducted by Principal Investigators. Full reports of these abstracts were presented to the annual meeting of Planetary Geology Principal Investigators and their associates at Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, May 23-26, 1977. 17. Key Words (Suggested by Author(s)) 18. Distribution Statement Planetary geology Solar system evolution Unclassified—Unlimited Planetary geological mapping Instrument development 19. Security Qassif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price* Unclassified Unclassified 294 $9.25 * For sale by the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 FOREWORD This is a compilation of abstracts of reports from Principal Investigators of NASA's Office of Space Science, Division of Lunar and Planetary Programs Planetary Geology Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Broad-Scale Climate Change Monitoring Evaluation Report for the Southern Region
    United States Department of Agriculture Broad-Scale Climate Change Monitoring Evaluation Report for the Southern Region Prepared by: Scott Williams Fire Management Specialist for: USDA Forest Service, Southern Region UPDATED June 2020 For More Information Contact: Chelsea Leitz 1720 Peachtree Rd NW, Suite 816N Atlanta, GA 30309 404-347-7193 [email protected] In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]