Public Sector Labor Relations in the District of Columbia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Catholic University Law Review Volume 28 Issue 4 Article 6 1979 Public Sector Labor Relations in the District of Columbia Bruce Comly French Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Bruce C. French, Public Sector Labor Relations in the District of Columbia, 28 Cath. U. L. Rev. 753 (1979). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol28/iss4/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Law Review by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PUBLIC SECTOR LABOR RELATIONS IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bruce Comfy French* In the fall of 1978, the District of Columbia City Council enacted the District of Columbia Government Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978.' As mandated by the Congress in provisions of the 1973 Home Rule Act,2 this complex statute will be the basis of all future personnel policies of the District government. The Personnel Act covers all aspects of personnel policy, including clas- sification of positions and compensation - setting schemes,3 standards of employee conduct and discipline,4 occupational safety and health pro- grams for public employees,5 and employee benefit programs.6 The most * Assistant Professor of Law, Claude W. Pettit College of Law, Ohio Northern Uni- versity, Ada, Ohio. B.A., The American University 1969; M.A., The American University 1970; J.D., The Antioch School of Law 1975. Member, Bars of the District of Columbia and Pennsylvania 1. District of Columbia Government Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978, D.C. Law No. 2-139 (March 3, 1978)(original version at 25 D.C. Reg. 7450 (1978))(to be codified in scattered sections of the D.C. Code) [hereinafter cited as Personnel Act]. 2. District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act, D.C. CODE ANN. §§ 101-771 (1973 & Supp. 1978) [hereinafter cited as Home Rule Act]. This Act delegates Congress' plenary authority over local matters to a popularly elected mayor and council. Council actions of a permanent legislative nature, however, require congressional review. D.C. CODE ANN. § I-147(c)(1) (1973 & Supp. 1978): as amended by Pub. L. No. 95-526, § 2, 92 Stat. 2023 (1978). Section 422(3) of the Home Rule Act man- dated consideration and adoption by the Council of a comprehensive merit personnel sys- tem for the District government and provided: The District government merit system shall be established by act of the Council. The system may provide for continued participation in all or part of the Federal Civil Service System and shall provide for persons employed by the District gov- ernment immediately preceding the effective date of such system personnel bene- fits, including but not limited to pay, tenure, leave, residence, retirement, health and life insurance, and employee disability and death benefits, all at least equal to those provided by legislation enacted by Congress, or regulation adopted pursuant thereto, and applicable to such officers and employees immediately prior to the effective date of the system established pursuant to this Act. D.C. CODE ANN., § 1-162(3) (1973 & Supp. 1978). 3. See Personnel Act, supra note 1, at §§ 1101-1114. 4. Id §§ 1601-1603 & 1801-1803. 5. Id. §§ 2001-2008. 6. Id §§ 2101-2202 & 2601-2602. Catholic University Law Review [Vol. 28:753 significant feature of the Personnel Act, however, is its provision for com- prehensive collective bargaining between the city government and recog- nized employee organizations.7 Thus, the prior statutory procedures for managing the personnel practices of more than 35,000 local government employees will be replaced by a system of collective bargaining over mat- ters affecting compensation' and working conditions.9 This new bargain- ing model will move the District's personnel system away from the federal civil service system, after which the D.C. system has been patterned for 0 forty-five years.' This article will focus upon the problem areas associated with the devel- opment of the labor-management relations program. It will discuss the creation of the Public Employee Relations Board [PERB] and explore col- lective bargaining policies, emphasizing the interaction and interpretation of statutes that directly affect the labor relations program." Finally, con- flicting provisions will be harmonized and, where necessary, amendatory 2 language will be suggested.' 7. One explicit purpose of the Personnel Act is to establish a "positive policy of labor- management relations including collective bargaining between the District of Columbia government and its employees," Id. § 103(a)(6). The introductory note also states that "an effective collective bargaining process is in the general public interest and will improve the morale of public employees and the quality of service to the public." These two policy statements, when coupled with the express preemptive provisions of the Act, give life to the developing collective bargaining process authorized between management and labor repre- sentatives under the Personnel Act. 8. See notes 120-42 and accompanying text infra. The Personnel Act honors existing labor contracts, which generally authorize only bargaining over terms and conditions of employment. When the new personnel system is fully effective after January 1, 1980, all recognized exclusive representatives of "occupational groups" will be authorized to bargain over matters affecting compensation. In the interim, compensation plans will be set by the mayor, or one of the educational boards subject to the Council's approval. 9. See notes 89-105 infra. 10. The District's former personnel system, a mixture of various federal enactments and intergovernmental orders, stems partly from an Executive Order issued by President Hoover in 1930. Title V of the United States Code also specifically refers to the District of Columbia government. See generally Personnel Act, supra note 1, at § 3202. Other provisions of fed- eral and D.C. law affecting District employees were amended or repealed by provisions of Title XXXII of the Personnel Act. Id §§ 3201-3208. The District Personnel Manual (DPM), issued by the mayor, comprises the set of rules and regulations governing personnel policy for most executive agencies. The DPM is available for review at the Office of Person- nel, Executive Office of the Mayor of the District of Columbia, 613 G Street, N.W., Wash- ington, D.C. 20001. II. This article will focus on the Act's two specific labor relations provisions: title V, which creates the Public Employee Relations Board [PERB] and title XVII, which outlines a labor-management relations program, and § 1113, which outlines provisions of the classifi- cation and compensation title affecting collective bargaining concerning compensation. 12. The complete text of the proposed amendatory act is set forth in Appendix A infra. 1979] Public Sector Labor Relations I. CONSIDERATION OF PERSONNEL LEGISLATION BY THE COUNCIL In January, 1976, the Council began considering legislation that would ultimately form the basis of the Personnel Act. Throughout the year sepa- rate personnel-related bills were introduced, and public hearings and roundtable discussions were held.' 3 In December, 1976, Councilmember Arrington Dixon introduced a comprehensive merit personnel act' 4 that was reintroduced at the start of the next legislative term.' 5 Dixon's bill, and a companion measure introduced on behalf of Mayor Walter Wash- ington,16 served as the legislative vehicles for the 1978 Personnel Act. The Committee on Government Operations, chaired by Dixon, had considered a broad range of potentially useful personnel policies. 17 Subsequent Council floor consideration of the measure on July 25 and October 17 and 31, 1978, only concentrated on two aspects of the labor relations titles: those relating to the structure of the PERB and to the collective bargaining rights of fire fighters and police officers over minor disciplinary matters.' 8 13. COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS, COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF CO- LUMBIA, REPORT ON BILL No. 2-10, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT COMPREHEN- SIVE MERIT PERSONNEL ACT 10 (Comm. Print No. 4, 1978) [hereinafter cited as Comm. Print No. 4]. 14. District Government Independent Merit Personnel Act, Council Bill No. 1-407, 23 D.C. Reg. 3891 (1976). 15. District Government Independent Merit Personnel Act, Council Bill No. 2-10, 23 D.C. Reg. 4488 (1977). 16. An Act to Establish a Merit Personnel Act for Employees of the District of Colum- bia Government, Council Bill No. 2-80, 23 D.C. Reg. 6463 (1977). 17. See Comm. Print No. 4, note 13 supra. Committee mark-up sessions were held on October 19, 21, 26, 28; November 2, 4, 16, 28, 1977; January 4, 18, February 1, 17; March 1, 15; April 19; May 3, 17, June 7, 17; and July 5, 1978. 18. For comments concerning the composition of the PERB, see note 39 infra. The relationship of sworn members of the police and fire departments (e.g., those officers who actually perform uniformed or plainclothes police work or uniformed fire fighting work) to the Career Service, created in title VIII of the Personnel Act, supra note 1, at § 801, was controversial from the beginning. Following the Committee on Government Operations public hearing on April 7, 1977, a committee staff discussion bill was prepared, representing an apparent consensus of opinion of those testifying at the public hearing. See Committee Discussion Draft No. 1, 24 D.C. Reg. 443 (1977). Title VIII(B) of this discussion bill pro- vided for a separate fire and police service. At the Committee's meeting on October 26, 1977, the Director of Personnel recommended elimination of the separate fire and police title with the caveat that minor adjustments be made to the definitions of "cause for removal" from the Career Service.