Plot T6, King's Cross Central

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plot T6, King's Cross Central planning report PDU/2647a/02 15 December 2010 Plot T6, King’s Cross Central in the London Borough of Camden planning application no. 2010/4468/P Strategic planning application stage II referral (new powers) Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 The proposal Development of student housing (657 bed spaces) in a building of between 14 and 27 storeys, along with a retail unit at ground floor level. The applicant The applicants are King’s Cross General Partner Ltd and Urbanest (UK), and the architect is Glenn Howells Architects Strategic issues This is a full planning application for new student housing, although outline permission for student housing already exists, as part of the wider King’s Cross Central masterplan. There were outstanding transport, design and energy matters from the consultation stage, and the Mayor and Deputy Mayor have also reconsidered the development against tall buildings policies. There are now no outstanding strategic issues. The Council’s decision Camden Council has resolved to grant permission for the development, subject to a section 106 legal agreement and no intervention from the Mayor. Recommendation That Camden Council be advised that the Mayor is content for it to determine the case itself, subject to any action that the Secretary of State may take, and does not therefore wish to direct refusal or direct that he is to be the local planning authority. Context 1 On 7 September 2010, the Mayor of London received documents from Camden Council notifying him of a planning application of potential strategic importance to develop the above site for the above uses. This was referred to the Mayor under Category 1C of the Schedule to the Order 2008: “Development which comprises or includes the erection of a building of … more than 30 metres high and is outside the City of London.” page 1 2 On 12 October 2010, the Mayor considered planning report PDU/2647a/01, and subsequently advised Camden Council that the application did not comply with the London Plan, for the reasons set out in paragraph 64 of the above-mentioned report; but that the possible remedies set out in paragraph 65 of that report could address these deficiencies. 3 A copy of the above-mentioned report is attached. The essentials of the case with regard to the proposal, the site, case history, strategic planning issues and relevant policies and guidance are as set out therein, unless otherwise stated in this report. Since then, additional information has been provided by the applicant, in response to the Mayor’s concerns (see below). On 24 November 2010, Camden Council decided that it was minded to grant planning permission for the application, and on 26 November 2010, it advised the Mayor of this decision. Under the provisions of Article 5 of the Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 the Mayor may allow the draft decision to proceed unchanged, direct Camden Council under Article 6 to refuse the application or issue a direction to Camden Council under Article 7 that he is to act as the Local Planning Authority for the purposes of determining the application. The Mayor has until 15 December 2010 to notify the Council of his decision and to issue any direction. 4 The decision on this case, and the reasons will be made available on the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk. Update 5 At the consultation stage, Camden Council was advised that the application did not comply with the London Plan, for the reasons set out in paragraph 64 of the above-mentioned report; but that the possible remedies set out in paragraph 65 of that report could address these deficiencies: Tall buildings/views 6 Since the previous consultation, the applicant presented additional information to officers, including additional views and models. Officers also visited the large-scale model of King’s Cross Central, displayed at the German Gymnasium behind King’s Cross Station. With the benefit of additional information supplied by the applicant regarding the development’s context and setting, officers are content that the scheme meets the requirements of the London Plan. Urban design 7 At the consultation stage, the applicant was asked to clarify with the Council the access arrangements for the disabled parking in within the service road area, and how this location could provide a safe and secure environment in the future. 8 During the initial stage of the building’s occupation, prior to the completion of the other buildings in the terrace adjacent to the railway, the entrance to the service road and parking area would be gated with secondary surveillance provided by CCTV, and a direct entrance from this area into the building. This is acceptable as a medium-term solution, but good design should rely on passive surveillance within the development, rather than on secondary measures such as remote surveillance. As the development of other sites progresses, the gate would be removed from the service road, and additional activity and estate management would provide additional surveillance. However, GLA officers recommend that the future design of T5 have a degree of passive surveillance over this area, as the access and parking has the potential to be shared. Although the proposed solution is not the optimum one, it is acceptable within the current context, and has potential for improvement. page 2 Transport and parking Comments from Transport for London 9 At consultation stage, several issues were highlighted. These included a the provision of a site-specific travel plan, the need for accomodation to be exclusively let to local universities, bike pooling, visitor cycle parking and provision of a constuction logistics plan and delivery and servicing plan. 10 It has been agreed that a site-specific travel plan, using the King’s Cross Central Travel Plan as a foundation, will be secured via legal agreement, which is welcomed. 11 The student accommodation shall only be occupied by students enrolled on a full-time or part-time course within Camden or an adjoining borough, or Kensington & Chelsea, where the provider of that course is funded by the Higher Education Funding Council for England. Transport for London (TfL) is satisfied that this will be secured by condition. 12 The bike-pooling scheme will no longer be implemented. The transport consultants confirmed that as a replacement, 21 foldable bikes will be made available to students on a rental basis. TfL is satisfied with this approach, which is in addition to ongoing discussions regarding a cycle hire docking station, the provision of onsite cycle parking and a site-specific travel plan. Additionally, the provision of visitor cycle parking will not be increased. The applicant’s transport consultant has clarified how visitors would be able to access the secure cycle parking, and TfL is satisfied that this will not compromise the secure nature of the cycle parking. As such, the proposal is acceptable, and it is expected that this management solution will committed within the travel plan. 13 TfL is satisfied that the construction process will be adequately managed through the existing legal agreement, which considers King’s Cross Central as a whole. As such, submission of a construction logistics plan is no longer required. Additionally, TfL is satisfied that the day-to-day servicing of the site will not be of detriment to the Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) and local highways. 14 The student management plan will be updated with further details regarding the move-in and move-out strategy for the students. This will be secured via legal agreement. 15 TfL supports the car-free designation of the site, thereby prohibiting occupiers from being issued with on-street parking permits. 16 In summary, all outstanding transport issues have been resolved, including a site-specific travel plan, construction logistics and delivery and servicing arrangements, cycle parking and hire and accommodation. The application is now considered to be in accordance with the London Plan and is acceptable in transport terms. Sustainability 17 At the consultation stage, the Mayor advised that he wished the applicant to commit to a 2010 Building Regulations compliant energy efficiency model, engage in further discussions regarding the wider implementation of the King’s Cross Central scheme, and provide the underlying assumptions of the renewable energy strategy. 18 The applicant has advised that committal to a 2010 Building Regulations model is not feasible, given that the planning application was submitted prior to the adoption of the updated model, and that design work started several months prior to this. The developer has provided additional information demonstrating that energy efficiency is higher than that required by the page 3 previous 2006 model, and that ongoing work is determining ways in which efficiency can continue to be raised. This position is accepted. 19 The applicant has provided further information on the proposed decentralised energy network delivery (including basic timescales) within the King’s Cross Central area. The T6 development will be the ‘trigger’ for the commencement of operation of the completed CHP energy centre that will eventually supply energy across the King’s Cross Central area. Information has also been provided on the assumptions underlying the energy strategy, along with support from Camden Council, to demonstrate that the model is robust, which is accepted by GLA officers. Response to consultation 20 Objections were received from approximately 20 residents and residents’ groups. Specific relevant concerns included: Compliance with the masterplan: After the expense and time taken to approve the original King’s Cross Central development, this is evidence that the original proposal allowed too much flexibility for the developer, and could lead to similar examples of non- compliant development.
Recommended publications
  • London Borough of Camden March 2021 Detailed Scheme Information
    MURPHY’S YARD LONDON BOROUGH OF CAMDEN DETAILED SCHEME INFORMATION MARCH 2021 HYBRID PLANNING APPLICATION The proposals are intended to be submitted in a How do we know that the outline elements will be consistent with the Why is flexibility being sought? vision for the site? Hybrid Planning Application to LB Camden. Due to The proposed uses within the employment uses are envisaged to be the scale of the project, the planning application will A Design Code is being produced which will set out the overarching complementary in order to create a vibrant, sustainable and inviting design principles which later planning applications need to adhere to. workspace environment. We are proposing flexibility within the also be considered by the GLA in addition to statutory workspaces in order to have the ability through the detailed design of This will include elements such as the architectural intent, the delivery these outline plots to develop this narrative more granularly, in order stakeholders. of the heathline, the massing approach, and so on. to curate a successful and dynamic place to work and visit. What is a Hybrid Planning Application? What does this mean for the heights and massing of the buildings in This is a planning application which consists of elements, some of the outline element of the planning application? which are in detail and some in outline. The planning application will be accompanied by parameter plans, which set out the proposed use, maximum mass and maximum heights of the plots. What’s the difference between detail and outline? It is envisaged that different architects will take on the detailed A detailed planning application contains all the information of the applications for different plots in the outline elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheltered Housing Schemes in Camden Contents
    Sheltered housing schemes in Camden Contents Page What is sheltered housing? .........................................................................................3 Other services for older people in Camden ..............................................................4 Other sheltered housing options in Camden ............................................................5 Map of scheme locations and schemes listed alphabetically .................................6 Scheme information .....................................................................................................8 Sheltered schemes listed by area Hampstead and Swiss Cottage Page Number Argenta ...........................................................................................................................9 Henderson Court ..........................................................................................................10 Monro House ................................................................................................................11 Robert Morton House ..................................................................................................12 Rose Bush Court ..........................................................................................................13 Spencer House .............................................................................................................14 Waterhouse Close ........................................................................................................15 Wells Court ...................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Space for Nature: Camden Biodiversity Strategy
    Creating space for nature: Camden Biodiversity Strategy Consultation draft Comments can be made at https://camdenbiodiversitystrategy.commonplace.is/ until the 14th May 2021. Contents Vision ......................................................................................................................... 1 What is ‘biodiversity’? ................................................................................................. 1 Why we need nature .................................................................................................. 2 An Ecological Emergency .......................................................................................... 7 The policy, strategy and legislative context .............................................................. 10 What you can do for nature ...................................................................................... 12 The Biodiversity Strategy ......................................................................................... 14 A Nature Recovery Network for Camden .............................................................. 15 The Action Plan ..................................................................................................... 16 The Camden Nature Partnership .......................................................................... 17 Evidence-based decision making .......................................................................... 17 Planning for a changing climate ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Has Been Superseded by the Euston Station OSD – Memorandum of Information
    – OSD been PQQ EUSTONhas STATIONStation DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY CANARY WHARF Euston Information document KING’S CROSS the of by CITY OF LONDON This ST PANCRAS INTERNATIONAL supersededMemorandum EUSTON STATION SOUTH BANK WEST END REGENT’S PARK working together to redevelop Euston – OSD been PQQ has Station Euston The DepartmentInformation for Transport and Network Rail intend to appoint documentthe of a long-term strategic Master Development Partner for the byredevelopment and regeneration of land at Euston Station This one of the largest development opportunities in central London supersededMemorandum – For illustrative purposes only Working together with the local community and– the Master Development Partner, we want to create a Euston that provides a great experience for the community, travellers, businesses and DEVELOPING visitors. Our aim is to generate economic development (including new jobs and homes) above and OSDaround the station and throughout the wider area, as well as to connect people and places across national and high-speed rail networks, London Underground and surface transport. THE VISION been PQQ has Station Euston For illustrative purposes only Inspirational place - Embraces local heritage A centre for thriving localInformation Continues the success and Network of green spaces Gateway to the UK and Europe documentthe communities of growth of the area by This Mixed use district which is a Generates long-term value Stimulates creativity and Promotes accessibility Robust urban framework magnet for business innovation supersededMemorandum – LOCATION OSD CAMDEN Euston Station is situated in the London Borough of Camden, in an area characterised by a diverse mix of uses, including some of London’s most ANGEL prestigious residentialbeen accommodation neighbouring Regent’s Park, premier commercial and office premises, and PQQworld-class educational, research, and HOLBORN cultural institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Camden Town High Street London, UK
    Camden Town High Street Lively Living on London, UK Camden High Street Deanna Goldy | Claire Harlow Colorful and funky, Camden Town High Street draws around 300,000 visitors each weekend. Camden Town High Street is located in Camden, a bor- ough just east of the heart of London. Camden is among the most diverse neighbor- hoods in London and High Street is well-known and loved for its artisans, unique shops, lively markets and alternative culture. Left Top: Camden High Street, from Google Street View Left Bottom: Vicinity of Greater London, from cityoflond.gov.uk Right: Camden High Street and immediate context, from Google Maps CAMDEN TOWN, LONDON “Working together strengthens and promotes a sense of community.” -Camden Together Neighborhood Character Ethnic Diversity: 27% non-white (Black African, Bangladeshi, Indian, Black Caribbean Chinese among others), 20% non-British white, 53% British white Languages spoken: more than 120 languages spoken including English, Bengali, Sylheti, Somali, Albanian, Arabic, French, Spanish, Portuguese and Lingala Historic preservation: 39 Conservation Areas and over 5,600 structures and buildings listed as architectural or historical interest Religion: 47% Christian, 12% Muslim, 6% Jewish, 4% Buddhist, Hindu and other, 22% non-religious, 10% no response to question Social Deprivation: 66% “educated urbanites”, 29% “inner city adversity” Famous residents of Camden Town: George Orwell, Charles Dickens, Mary Shelley, photo credit http-_k43.pbase.com_u44_louloubelle_large_28774912. and Liam Gallagher, lead
    [Show full text]
  • Camden Profile
    Camden Demographic Profile 2007 Camden Profile Link to Demographic Databook June 2021 Overall Size and Composition1 are from overseas. 28% of students live in uni- Comprising almost 22 square kilometres in the versity halls of residence or properties; while heart of London, Camden is a borough of di- 39% reside in the area south of Euston Road3. versity and contrasts. Business centres such as Holborn, Euston and Tottenham Court The latest ‘official’ estimate of Camden's resi- Road contrast with exclusive residential dis- dent population is 279,500 at mid-20204. This tricts in Hampstead and Highgate, thriving Bel- is the nationally comparable population esti- size Park, the open spaces of Hampstead mate required for government returns and na- Heath, Parliament Hill and Kenwood, the tionally comparable performance indicators. youthful energy of Camden Town, subdivided houses in Kentish Town and West Hamp- For overall strategy and for planning stead, as well as areas of relative deprivation. services, Camden uses the GLA demo- graphic projections – See Future Change The Council has designated 40 Conservation in Population on p2). Areas that cover approximately half the bor- ough, while more than 5,600 buildings and ONS estimates show that of our neighbours, structures are listed as having special archi- Barnet and Brent have larger populations; Ha- tectural or historic interest. Camden is well ringey, Westminster, Islington and the City are served by public transport, including three smaller. Camden is just a fragment of Greater main-line railway stations (St Pancras, King’s London, occupying only 1.4% by area – mak- Cross and Euston); and St Pancras Interna- ing it London’s 8th smallest borough by area, tional; with extensive bus, tube and suburban but 5th highest by population density (128 per rail networks – soon to include the Crossrail hectare).
    [Show full text]
  • Camden Local Education Authority
    CAMDEN LOCAL EDUCATION AUTHORITY POST Housekeeper SALARY Scale point 9 fixed THE POST 1. To provide domestic service in designated units in response to the service needs of senior officers. 2. To help maintain a high standard of order and cleanliness throughout the Centre. 3. To support the Early Years workers in their work with the children. CAMDEN – A BOROUGH OF CONTRASTS Comprising 11 square miles in the heart of London, Camden is a borough of immense contrast and diversity. The business centres of Euston, Tottenham Court Road and New Oxford Street, the exclusive residential districts of Hampstead and Highgate, the youthful energy of Camden Town, the graceful square of Bloomsbury, the inner city areas of King’s Cross and Somerstown, the great open spaces of Hampstead Heath, Parliament Hill Fields and Kenwood – all combine to make Camden a truly unique borough. The population of the Borough is 189,100. There are around 4,500 children aged 3 and 4 and 31,000 residents aged 5-19. CAMDEN LEA Camden is a very successful inner city LEA. It has a strong partnership with schools and centres who provide high quality education for the learners of the Borough. The LEA’s aim is to raise achievement by supporting high quality lifelong learning. It is concerned with the entitlement of individuals and how their educational needs can be met. Camden maintains 58 schools, 9 Under 5’s Centres, 40 Youth Centres/Units and 2 Pupil Referral Units. Camden LEA is committed: ♦ to a comprehensive community education service ♦ to placing the learner, whether a young person or adult, at the centre when educational policies are being developed; ♦ to ensuring all learners are of equal value and are entitled to high quality educational opportunities; ♦ to a publicly accountable local service; ♦ to the promotion of strong partnerships.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMDEN STREET NAMES and Their Origins
    CAMDEN STREET NAMES and their origins © David A. Hayes and Camden History Society, 2020 Introduction Listed alphabetically are In 1853, in London as a whole, there were o all present-day street names in, or partly 25 Albert Streets, 25 Victoria, 37 King, 27 Queen, within, the London Borough of Camden 22 Princes, 17 Duke, 34 York and 23 Gloucester (created in 1965); Streets; not to mention the countless similarly named Places, Roads, Squares, Terraces, Lanes, o abolished names of streets, terraces, Walks, Courts, Alleys, Mews, Yards, Rents, Rows, alleyways, courts, yards and mews, which Gardens and Buildings. have existed since c.1800 in the former boroughs of Hampstead, Holborn and St Encouraged by the General Post Office, a street Pancras (formed in 1900) or the civil renaming scheme was started in 1857 by the parishes they replaced; newly-formed Metropolitan Board of Works o some named footpaths. (MBW), and administered by its ‘Street Nomenclature Office’. The project was continued Under each heading, extant street names are after 1889 under its successor body, the London itemised first, in bold face. These are followed, in County Council (LCC), with a final spate of name normal type, by names superseded through changes in 1936-39. renaming, and those of wholly vanished streets. Key to symbols used: The naming of streets → renamed as …, with the new name ← renamed from …, with the old Early street names would be chosen by the name and year of renaming if known developer or builder, or the owner of the land. Since the mid-19th century, names have required Many roads were initially lined by individually local-authority approval, initially from parish named Terraces, Rows or Places, with houses Vestries, and then from the Metropolitan Board of numbered within them.
    [Show full text]
  • Hampstead Conservation Area Advisory Committee (Hcaac)
    HAMPSTEAD CONSERVATION AREA ADVISORY COMMITTEE (HCAAC) Advises London Borough of Camden on planning applications. Brings together representation of residents associations in Hampstead area. LONDON PLAN COMMENTSs HCAAC has long-established views on development matters especially those dealt with in the DLP and we draw on submissions by various bodies and individuals listed in abbreviations below. We note LBC is not obliged to comment on the DLP but does so and we agree with its submission. Abbreviations CPRE – Council for the Protection of Rural England LBC – London Borough of Camden DLP / NLP – the current Draft London Plan. FALP – (CPRE) the former Alterations to the London Plan. HHS – Heath & Hampstead Society RfNF – Redfrog Neighbourhood Forum HCAAC – Hampstead Conservation Advisory Committee CCAACs – Camden Conservation Areas Advisory Committees Group. HOUSING DLP calls for assessment for development of any site having ‘available’ land. Intensification & Optimisation are conside3red to increase sites’ use and densities defined ad hoc per site. Brownfield sites are mentioned but are these considered separately from other small sites. LBC not obliged to have own housing targets, but acknowledges DLP aims and aligns with own targets. The DLP should allow for more feasible targets especially for Affordable Housing. Control for this should be robust and not susceptible to dilution by developers pushing for or councils accepting ‘provision elsewhere’. (David Milne) Welcome offer of units to Londoners before marketing elsewhere. Requires Parliamentary action ? Small housing sites H1 C – is permission in principle separate from brownfield sites review. This should not apply as a blanket policy to all small sites. Sites allocation important – how will Camden allocate sites in Hampstead and Redfrog? These are tightly-developed or well-landscaped areas.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Camden
    London Borough of Camden Decentralised energy strategy and overview of local authority led networks Jennifer Belk Senior Sustainability Officer (Low Carbon Energy) Angela Murphy Sustainability Strategy Team Leader (Housing) camden.gov.uk The History Gospel Oak Kentish Town Euston camden.gov.uk How was Euston developed? camden.gov.uk Somers Town Energy We’ve made a video! Watch it at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uiwgXL60iY camden.gov.uk Points To Share Financial Benefits VS. Non-financial Benefits Savings over Business As Usual expenditure on Carbon reduction plant replacement Ability to track emerging low carbon technology Fixed plant replacement costs tied into knowing that infrastructure is in place. maintenance charge Opportunity to provide new heating solutions to Long term (15 years) maintenance contract residents that will last. Ability to retain control of heat pricing in order to Carbon reduction cost protect residents. camden.gov.uk Points To Share The ability to retrofit Making the most of the Council’s traditional assets with little visual impact camden.gov.uk Points To Share Phasing Reacting to replacement schedules and completion dates camden.gov.uk Gospel Oak Tripartite agreement • 1,449 homes • 2,800 t of CO2 saved pa • 51% of heat supplied by the waste from the CHP • Launch 2015, heat since 2013 - Part funded by the GLA and CESP - Savings realised from lower fuel costs will be used to set lower heating charges for residents camden.gov.uk Gospel Oak • The gas turbine at the Royal Free hospital delivers electricity and heat to the hospital. • The heat for the hospital is in the form of steam at circa 175 deg C • Once this heat has been delivered there is still residual heat which can be recovered to generate hot water • This is achieved by the addition of a heat exchanger which cools the exhaust from the Royal Free turbine down to 120 degrees C • The heat exchanger delivers up to 1500 kW of heat.
    [Show full text]
  • A Large Two Double Bedroom Lateral Flat Situated on the Second Floor of This Well Known Block in Belsize Village
    A large two double bedroom lateral flat situated on the second floor of this well known block in Belsize Village. Akenside Court, 26 Belsize Crescent, Hampstead, London, NW3 £550 pw (£2,383.33 pcm) plus fees apply, Part Furnished, Unfurnished Available from 17.09.2020 • Two bedrooms • Two bathrooms • Large reception room • Lift • Lots of natural light Local Information Belsize Crescent is situated moments from the charming Belsize Village, which is shops and restaurants, and also offer access to Belsize Park, Primrose Hill, Finchley Road and Hampstead. Transport Links include: Northern Line (Belsize Park): approx 0.5 miles Jubilee Line (Swiss Cottage): approx 0.6 miles Metropolitan line (Finchley Road): approx 0.5 miles About this property A large two double bedroom lateral apartment situated on the second floor of this well known block in Belsize Village. The accommodation comprises: large sweeping reception/dining room, separate kitchen, two double bedrooms and two bathrooms. The property further benefits from large windows providing an abundance of natural light. Furnishing Part Furnished, Unfurnished Local Authority London Borough Of Camden Council Tax Band = F Energy Performance EPC Rating = C Viewing All viewings will be accompanied and are strictly by prior arrangement through Savills Hampstead Lettings Office. Telephone: +44 (0) 20 7472 5030. Akenside Court, 26 Belsize Crescent, Hampstead, London, NW3 Gross Internal Area 934 sq ft, 86.8 m² Ali Ishaq Hampstead Lettings +44 (0) 20 7472 5030 savills savills.co.uk [email protected] Important notice Savills, their clients and any joint agents give notice that: 1. They are not authorised to make or give any representations or warranties in relation to the property either here or elsewhere, either on their own behalf or on behalf of their client or otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • LONDON BOROUGH of CAMDEN WARDS: Fortune Green and West Hampstead
    LONDON BOROUGH OF CAMDEN WARDS: Fortune Green and West Hampstead REPORT TITLE Formal redesignation of Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Forum (SC/2019/27) REPORT OF Executive Director Supporting Communities FOR SUBMISSION TO DATE Cabinet Member for Investing in Communities 12 April 2019 SUMMARY OF REPORT This report seeks Cabinet Member approval to redesignate the Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Forum for a further period of five years. The Forum was originally designated for five years from 9 May 2013. The Forum have submitted an application to the Council for redesignation to continue to operate across the Fortune Green and West Hampstead neighbourhood area. In line with the regulations, the Council has consulted the local community on the application. Neighbourhood planning accords with Our Camden Plan objectives, in particular those relating to safe, strong, and open communities. Designation allows neighbourhood forums to play an active role in planning for their community and local area. A Single Member decision is required in line with the Council’s Constitution. Local Government Act 1972 – Access to Information There are no documents used in the preparation of this report that are required to be listed. Contact Officer: Kate Goodman, Planning Policy, Regeneration and Planning, 5 Pancras Square. Tel: 020 7974 2254; Email: [email protected] RECOMMENDATIONS The Cabinet Member for Investing in Communities is asked to: (i) note the responses to consultation on the application for the redesignation of the Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Forum and the Council’s assessment of the Forum’s application set out in Appendices 2 and 3; (ii) agree the re-designation of the Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Forum as a neighbourhood forum for a period of five years.
    [Show full text]