Discovery of a Low-Mass Companion to a Metal-Rich F Star with the Marvels Pilot Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Discovery of a Low-Mass Companion to a Metal-Rich F Star with the Marvels Pilot Project The Astrophysical Journal, 718:1186–1199, 2010 August 1 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/718/2/1186 C 2010. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. DISCOVERY OF A LOW-MASS COMPANION TO A METAL-RICH F STAR WITH THE MARVELS PILOT PROJECT Scott W. Fleming1,JianGe1, Suvrath Mahadevan1,2,3, Brian Lee1, Jason D. Eastman4, Robert J. Siverd4, B. Scott Gaudi4, Andrzej Niedzielski5, Thirupathi Sivarani6, Keivan G. Stassun7,8, Alex Wolszczan2,3, Rory Barnes9, Bruce Gary7, Duy Cuong Nguyen1, Robert C. Morehead1, Xiaoke Wan1, Bo Zhao1, Jian Liu1, Pengcheng Guo1, Stephen R. Kane1,10, Julian C. van Eyken1,10, Nathan M. De Lee1, Justin R. Crepp1,11, Alaina C. Shelden1,12, Chris Laws9, John P. Wisniewski9, Donald P. Schneider2,3, Joshua Pepper7, Stephanie A. Snedden12, Kaike Pan12, Dmitry Bizyaev12, Howard Brewington12, Olena Malanushenko12, Viktor Malanushenko12, Daniel Oravetz12, Audrey Simmons12, and Shannon Watters12,13 1 Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, 211 Bryant Space Science Center, Gainesville, FL 326711-2055, USA; scfl[email protected]fl.edu 2 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802, USA 3 Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA 4 Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA 5 Torun´ Center for Astronomy, Nicolaus Copernicus University, ul. Gagarina 11, 87-100, Torun,´ Poland 6 Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore 560034, India 7 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA 8 Department of Physics, Fisk University, 1000 17th Ave. N., Nashville, TN 37208, USA 9 Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, P.O. Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 10 NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, Caltech, MS 100-22, 770 South Wilson Avenue, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 11 Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 12 Apache Point Observatory, P.O. Box 59, Sunspot, NM 88349-0059, USA 13 Institute for Astronomy, 34 Ohia Ku St., Pukalani, HI 96768-8288, USA Received 2010 April 26; accepted 2010 June 8; published 2010 July 13 ABSTRACT We report the discovery of a low-mass companion orbiting the metal-rich, main sequence F star TYC 2949-00557-1 during the Multi-object APO Radial Velocity Exoplanet Large-area Survey (MARVELS) pilot project. The host star has an effective temperature Teff = 6135 ± 40 K, logg = 4.4 ± 0.1, and [Fe/H] = 0.32 ± 0.01, indicating a mass of M = 1.25 ± 0.09 M and R = 1.15 ± 0.15 R. The companion has an orbital period of 5.69449 ± 0.00023 days and straddles the hydrogen burning limit with a minimum mass of 64 MJ, and thus may be an example of the rare class of brown dwarfs orbiting at distances comparable to those of “Hot Jupiters.” We present relative photometry that demonstrates that the host star is photometrically stable at the few millimagnitude level on time scales of hours to years, and rules out transits for a companion of radius 0.8 RJ at the 95% confidence level. Tidal analysis of the system suggests that the star and companion are likely in a double synchronous state where both rotational and orbital synchronization have been achieved. This is the first low-mass companion detected with a multi-object, dispersed, fixed-delay interferometer. Key words: brown dwarfs – planetary systems – stars: low-mass Online-only material: color figures 1. INTRODUCTION (12 MJ m sin i 80 MJ ) at separations of a 5AU, relative to more massive stellar companions and less massive Studies of the frequency, parameter distributions, and corre- planetary companions (Marcy & Butler 2000). Note that we lations of extrasolar planets require homogeneous samples of denote i as the inclination angle between the companion’s hundreds of planets to obtain statistically significant results. orbital angular momentum vector and the line of sight, and Moreover, such a sample must have well-understood complete- we reserve I as the inclination angle of the stellar rotation ness limits, selection effects, and biases, which are easiest to ob- axis to the line of sight. While the frequency of brown dwarf tain from a single, large-scale survey. Given current constraints companions at larger separations is still relatively uncertain on the frequency of giant planets, detection of such a large sam- (e.g., Metchev & Hillenbrand 2009), a meta-analysis of sets of ple of planetary systems generally requires a precision radial known companions to solar-type stars by Grether & Lineweaver velocity (RV) survey of many thousands of stars. Such a survey (2006), with corrections for observational bias, confirmed the also provides a wealth of ancillary science. In particular, it is lack of brown dwarfs at close separations. These authors place exquisitely sensitive to more massive companions, and because the “driest” part of the brown dwarf desert at ∼20–50 MJ , with it targets a large and broad sample of host stars, it is naturally a frequency of companions 0.5% in this range of masses. sensitive to rare binary systems in poorly explored regions of Although there has been a steady increase in the number of parameter space. known brown dwarf candidates via the RV technique (Marcy Of particular interest are the constraints on the frequency et al. 2001;Udryetal.2002; Endl et al. 2004; Patel et al. and parameter distributions of low-mass companions to solar- 2007; Wittenmyer et al. 2009; Kane et al. 2009; Jenkins et al. type stars with masses near the hydrogen burning limit. One of 2009; Niedzielski et al. 2009; Omiya et al. 2009), most of the early results from precise RV searches was the apparent these detections have been at separations a 0.8 AU. Notable paucity of brown dwarf companions with minimum masses exceptions include the transiting brown dwarf CoRoT-Exo-3b 1186 No. 2, 2010 DISCOVERY OF TYC 2949-00557-1b 1187 with a period of ∼4 days orbiting an F3V star (Deleuil et al. Table 1 2008), and HD41004Bb with a period of ∼1 day orbiting the MPP RV Observations a M dwarf component of a K–M binary system (Santos et al. BJDTDB RV σRV 2002). Brown dwarfs at such short orbital separations are (ms−1) (ms−1) of particular interest for several reasons. First, the frequency 2454101.69079 13339 94 of such systems as a function of their physical and orbital 2454105.75520 19819 98 parameters provide diagnostics that may be able to distinguish 2454106.70228 14981 96 between the various mechanisms that have been invoked for their 2454128.62211 19018 143 formation and dynamical evolution (e.g., Armitage & Bonnell 2454128.86491 17170 91 2002; Matzner & Levin 2005). In particular, these systems offer 2454130.83623 13299 94 observational constraints on the poorly understood theory of 2454136.64529 15043 85 tidal interactions between host stars and close companions (e.g., 2454136.85894 15854 139 2454163.72245 14882 91 Mazeh 2008; Pont 2009). Second, these systems are much more 2454188.69749 21003 136 likely to transit than their longer-period counterparts, as the 2454191.68122 15421 97 transit probability is inversely proportional to orbital separation. 2454194.69216 21197 115 Transiting systems yield valuable measurements on the masses, 2454195.68446 24453 102 radii, and mean densities of brown dwarfs (Stassun et al. 2006, 2454217.61115 22758 79 2007; Deleuil et al. 2008). Here we report the discovery of a candidate short-period, Note. a Errors are not scaled to account for systematics. brown dwarf companion to the metal-rich star TYC 2949- 00557-1, a main sequence F star with apparent brightness ter; previous observations with a single-object DFDI instrument ∼ V 12.1. This companion was discovered as part of the at Kitt Peak National Observatory (KPNO) resulted in the first Multi-object APO Radial Velocity Exoplanet Large-area Survey extrasolar planet discovered via this technique (Ge et al. 2006b), (MARVELS) pilot project (hereafter MPP). The MPP used the as well as the first confirmed planet via DFDI (van Eyken et al. W. M. Keck Exoplanet Tracker (Keck ET) instrument (Ge et al. 2004) and the ability to measure precise, absolute RVs with 2006a) on the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) 2.5 m telescope DFDI (Mahadevan et al. 2008). (Gunn et al. 2006) at the Apache Point Observatory. The Keck ET instrument is a multi-object (59 targets per exposure), 2. DOPPLER OBSERVATIONS dispersed fixed-delay interferometer (DFDI; Ge et al. 2002;Ge 2002; Erskine 2002; Erskine et al. 2003). In this instrument, 2.1. MPP Observations fiber-fed starlight from the telescope is first passed through an iodine cell that acts as a stable wavelength reference. This The MPP targeted 708 F, G, and K dwarfs with 7.6 <V <12 light is then fed through a fixed-delay interferometer controlled in 12 different fields, each containing 59 stars. Data for each via a piezoelectric transducer (PZT), and finally through a field were processed simultaneously using a pipeline developed spectrograph that has a spectral resolution of R = 5100. RV for multi-object DFDI instruments (see van Eyken et al. 2004; information is then imprinted in the phases of the fringes Ge et al. 2006b; Mahadevan et al. 2008, for details of basic perpendicular to the dispersion axis of the spectrum due to a DFDI processing steps.) For each target, we determine a “quality fixed variation in the interferometer delay along this direction. factor” (QF), which we define as The primary goal of the MPP was to demonstrate a fully rms (X −X) integrated DFDI instrument capable of observing multiple stars QF = , (1) in a single exposure.
Recommended publications
  • Geological Timeline
    Geological Timeline In this pack you will find information and activities to help your class grasp the concept of geological time, just how old our planet is, and just how young we, as a species, are. Planet Earth is 4,600 million years old. We all know this is very old indeed, but big numbers like this are always difficult to get your head around. The activities in this pack will help your class to make visual representations of the age of the Earth to help them get to grips with the timescales involved. Important EvEnts In thE Earth’s hIstory 4600 mya (million years ago) – Planet Earth formed. Dust left over from the birth of the sun clumped together to form planet Earth. The other planets in our solar system were also formed in this way at about the same time. 4500 mya – Earth’s core and crust formed. Dense metals sank to the centre of the Earth and formed the core, while the outside layer cooled and solidified to form the Earth’s crust. 4400 mya – The Earth’s first oceans formed. Water vapour was released into the Earth’s atmosphere by volcanism. It then cooled, fell back down as rain, and formed the Earth’s first oceans. Some water may also have been brought to Earth by comets and asteroids. 3850 mya – The first life appeared on Earth. It was very simple single-celled organisms. Exactly how life first arose is a mystery. 1500 mya – Oxygen began to accumulate in the Earth’s atmosphere. Oxygen is made by cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) as a product of photosynthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Centrality of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass at Christendom College
    THE CENTRALITY OF THE HOLY SACRIFICE OF THE MASS AT CHRISTENDOM COLLEGE The Church teaches that the Eucharist is “the source and summit of the Christian life”1 and that the celebration of the Mass “is a sacred action surpassing all others. No other action of the Church can equal its efficacy.”2 That is why “as a natural expression of the Catholic identity of the University. members of this community . will be encouraged to participate in the celebration of the sacraments, especially the Eucharist, as the most perfect act of community worship.”3 Those central truths are taught and lived at Christendom College, a “Catholic coeducational college institutionally committed to the Magisterium”4 of the Church, in the following ways: The Celebration of the Sacred Liturgy The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass • Mass is offered frequently: twice daily Monday through Thursday, three times on MONDAY (Friday), twice on Saturday, and once on Sunday (the day on which we gather as one family). • Mass in the Roman Rite is celebrated in all the ways offered by the Church: in the Ordinary Form in both English and Latin, and in the Extraordinary Form from one to three times per week, as circumstances permit. • The Ordinary Form of the Mass is celebrated with the solemnity appropriate to each feast, utilizing worthy sacred vessels and vestments, and drawing upon the Church’s rich tradition of chant, polyphony, and hymnody. • The Ordinary Form of the Mass is celebrated reverently and with rubrical fidelity. • No classes or other activities are scheduled during Mass times. • The majority of the College community attends daily Mass regularly and with great devotion.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding When to Kneel, Sit and Stand at a Traditional Latin Mass
    UNDERSTANDING WHEN TO KNEEL, SIT AND STAND AT A TRADITIONAL LATIN MASS __________________________ A Short Essay on Mass Postures __________________________ by Richard Friend I. Introduction A Catholic assisting at a Traditional Latin Mass for the first time will most likely experience bewilderment and confusion as to when to kneel, sit and stand, for the postures that people observe at Traditional Latin Masses are so different from what he is accustomed to. To understand what people should really be doing at Mass is not always determinable from what people remember or from what people are presently doing. What is needed is an understanding of the nature of the liturgy itself, and then to act accordingly. When I began assisting at Traditional Latin Masses for the first time as an adult, I remember being utterly confused with Mass postures. People followed one order of postures for Low Mass, and a different one for Sung Mass. I recall my oldest son, then a small boy, being thoroughly amused with the frequent changes in people’s postures during Sung Mass, when we would go in rather short order from standing for the entrance procession, kneeling for the preparatory prayers, standing for the Gloria, sitting when the priest sat, rising again when he rose, sitting for the epistle, gradual, alleluia, standing for the Gospel, sitting for the epistle in English, rising for the Gospel in English, sitting for the sermon, rising for the Credo, genuflecting together with the priest, sitting when the priest sat while the choir sang the Credo, kneeling when the choir reached Et incarnatus est etc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the Two Forms of the Roman Rite
    A Comparison of the Two Forms of the Roman Rite Mass Structures Orientation Language The purpose of this presentation is to prepare you for what will very likely be your first Traditional Latin Mass (TLM). This is officially named “The Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite.” We will try to do that by comparing it to what you already know - the Novus Ordo Missae (NOM). This is officially named “The Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite.” In “Mass Structures” we will look at differences in form. While the TLM really has only one structure, the NOM has many options. As we shall see, it has so many in fact, that it is virtually impossible for the person in the pew to determine whether the priest actually performs one of the many variations according to the rubrics (rules) for celebrating the NOM. Then, we will briefly examine the two most obvious differences in the performance of the Mass - the orientation of the priest (and people) and the language used. The orientation of the priest in the TLM is towards the altar. In this position, he is facing the same direction as the people, liturgical “east” and, in a traditional church, they are both looking at the tabernacle and/or crucifix in the center of the altar. The language of the TLM is, of course, Latin. It has been Latin since before the year 400. The NOM was written in Latin but is usually performed in the language of the immediate location - the vernacular. [email protected] 1 Mass Structure: Novus Ordo Missae Eucharistic Prayer Baptism I: A,B,C,D Renewal Eucharistic Prayer II: A,B,C,D Liturgy of Greeting: Penitential Concluding Dismissal: the Word: A,B,C Rite: A,B,C Eucharistic Prayer Rite: A,B,C A,B,C Year 1,2,3 III: A,B,C,D Eucharistic Prayer IV: A,B,C,D 3 x 4 x 3 x 16 x 3 x 3 = 5184 variations (not counting omissions) Or ~ 100 Years of Sundays This is the Mass that most of you attend.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Requiem Mass
    REQUIEM LOW MASS FOR TWO SERVERS The Requiem Mass is very ancient in its origin, being the predecessor of the current Roman Rite (i.e., the so- called “Tridentine Rite”) of Mass before the majority of the gallicanizations1 of the Mass were introduced. And so, many ancient features, in the form of omissions from the normal customs of Low Mass, are observed2. A. Interwoven into the beautiful and spiritually consoling Requiem Rite is the liturgical principle, that all blessings are reserved for the deceased soul(s) for whose repose the Mass is being celebrated. This principle is put into action through the omission of these blessings: 1. Holy water is not taken before processing into the Sanctuary. 2. The sign of the Cross is not made at the beginning of the Introit3. 3. C does not kiss the praeconium4 of the Gospel after reading it5. 4. During the Offertory, the water is not blessed before being mixed with the wine in the chalice6. 5. The Last Blessing is not given. B. All solita oscula that the servers usually perform are omitted, namely: . When giving and receiving the biretta. When presenting and receiving the cruets at the Offertory. C. Also absent from the Requiem Mass are all Gloria Patris, namely during the Introit and the Lavabo. D. The Preparatory Prayers are said in an abbreviated form: . The entire of Psalm 42 (Judica me) is omitted; consequently the prayers begin with the sign of the Cross and then “Adjutorium nostrum…” is immediately said. After this, the remainder of the Preparatory Prayers are said as usual.
    [Show full text]
  • Outer Planets: the Ice Giants
    Outer Planets: The Ice Giants A. P. Ingersoll, H. B. Hammel, T. R. Spilker, R. E. Young Exploring Uranus and Neptune satisfies NASA’s objectives, “investigation of the Earth, Moon, Mars and beyond with emphasis on understanding the history of the solar system” and “conduct robotic exploration across the solar system for scientific purposes.” The giant planet story is the story of the solar system (*). Earth and the other small objects are leftovers from the feast of giant planet formation. As they formed, the giant planets may have migrated inward or outward, ejecting some objects from the solar system and swallowing others. The giant planets most likely delivered water and other volatiles, in the form of icy planetesimals, to the inner solar system from the region around Neptune. The “gas giants” Jupiter and Saturn are mostly hydrogen and helium. These planets must have swallowed a portion of the solar nebula intact. The “ice giants” Uranus and Neptune are made primarily of heavier stuff, probably the next most abundant elements in the Sun – oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur. For each giant planet the core is the “seed” around which it accreted nebular gas. The ice giants may be more seed than gas. Giant planets are laboratories in which to test our theories about geophysics, plasma physics, meteorology, and even oceanography in a larger context. Their bottomless atmospheres, with 1000 mph winds and 100 year-old storms, teach us about weather on Earth. The giant planets’ enormous magnetic fields and intense radiation belts test our theories of terrestrial and solar electromagnetic phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • The Solar System Cause Impact Craters
    ASTRONOMY 161 Introduction to Solar System Astronomy Class 12 Solar System Survey Monday, February 5 Key Concepts (1) The terrestrial planets are made primarily of rock and metal. (2) The Jovian planets are made primarily of hydrogen and helium. (3) Moons (a.k.a. satellites) orbit the planets; some moons are large. (4) Asteroids, meteoroids, comets, and Kuiper Belt objects orbit the Sun. (5) Collision between objects in the Solar System cause impact craters. Family portrait of the Solar System: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, (Eris, Ceres, Pluto): My Very Excellent Mother Just Served Us Nine (Extra Cheese Pizzas). The Solar System: List of Ingredients Ingredient Percent of total mass Sun 99.8% Jupiter 0.1% other planets 0.05% everything else 0.05% The Sun dominates the Solar System Jupiter dominates the planets Object Mass Object Mass 1) Sun 330,000 2) Jupiter 320 10) Ganymede 0.025 3) Saturn 95 11) Titan 0.023 4) Neptune 17 12) Callisto 0.018 5) Uranus 15 13) Io 0.015 6) Earth 1.0 14) Moon 0.012 7) Venus 0.82 15) Europa 0.008 8) Mars 0.11 16) Triton 0.004 9) Mercury 0.055 17) Pluto 0.002 A few words about the Sun. The Sun is a large sphere of gas (mostly H, He – hydrogen and helium). The Sun shines because it is hot (T = 5,800 K). The Sun remains hot because it is powered by fusion of hydrogen to helium (H-bomb). (1) The terrestrial planets are made primarily of rock and metal.
    [Show full text]
  • Master of Ceremonies for High Mass (Missa Cantata)
    MASTER OF CEREMONIES FOR HIGH MASS (MISSA CANTATA) REQUIREMENTS AND EXPECTATIONS OF A MASTER OF CEREMONIES A master of ceremonies (MC) must be what his title entails: the master, or expert, on the liturgical ceremonies. Hence, he must not only fully know the positions of the inferior ministers at High Mass, but also be acquainted with the celebrant’s actions. Additionally, the MC should have a thorough understanding of the general principles of the Roman Rite,1 be acquainted with the various liturgical books,2 the liturgical office of the schola and how it affects the MC’s position,3 and of course, the layout and preparation of the missal. The MC must also know how to correct a problematic situation with tact and discretion; this is especially true when advising the celebrant (C). In dealing with the servers, any corrections made (especially from a distance) should be as inconspicuous as possible. For minor matters, it is often better to simply let the matter pass and address it later outside of the ceremony in the sacristy. CONCERNING THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PREPARATIONS BEFORE MASS The MC must oversee all of the preparations that are necessary before the beginning of Mass. You must ensure they are done correctly and on time so that Mass may start as scheduled. As MC, you should remain the sacristy as much as possible, directing the preparations from there (there should be a permanent duties checklist in the sacristy assigning each server a specific duty to complete before Mass). In this way, you can ensure the servers are keeping silence in the sacristy, are organized and that any last minute details can be taken care of easily (such as replacing late servers).
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for Exomoons and the Characterization of Exoplanet Atmospheres
    Corso di Laurea Specialistica in Astronomia e Astrofisica The search for exomoons and the characterization of exoplanet atmospheres Relatore interno : dott. Alessandro Melchiorri Relatore esterno : dott.ssa Giovanna Tinetti Candidato: Giammarco Campanella Anno Accademico 2008/2009 The search for exomoons and the characterization of exoplanet atmospheres Giammarco Campanella Dipartimento di Fisica Università degli studi di Roma “La Sapienza” Associate at Department of Physics & Astronomy University College London A thesis submitted for the MSc Degree in Astronomy and Astrophysics September 4th, 2009 Università degli Studi di Roma ―La Sapienza‖ Abstract THE SEARCH FOR EXOMOONS AND THE CHARACTERIZATION OF EXOPLANET ATMOSPHERES by Giammarco Campanella Since planets were first discovered outside our own Solar System in 1992 (around a pulsar) and in 1995 (around a main sequence star), extrasolar planet studies have become one of the most dynamic research fields in astronomy. Our knowledge of extrasolar planets has grown exponentially, from our understanding of their formation and evolution to the development of different methods to detect them. Now that more than 370 exoplanets have been discovered, focus has moved from finding planets to characterise these alien worlds. As well as detecting the atmospheres of these exoplanets, part of the characterisation process undoubtedly involves the search for extrasolar moons. The structure of the thesis is as follows. In Chapter 1 an historical background is provided and some general aspects about ongoing situation in the research field of extrasolar planets are shown. In Chapter 2, various detection techniques such as radial velocity, microlensing, astrometry, circumstellar disks, pulsar timing and magnetospheric emission are described. A special emphasis is given to the transit photometry technique and to the two already operational transit space missions, CoRoT and Kepler.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Planetarium in Cyberstage
    Virtual Planetarium in Cyb erStage Valery Burkin, Martin Gob el, Frank Hasenbrink, Stanislav Klimenko, Igor Nikitin, Henrik Tramb erend GMD { German National Research Center for Information Technology Abstract. We describ e an educational application in virtual environ- ment, intended for teaching and demonstration of basics of astronomy. The application includes 3D mo dels of 30 ob jects in the Solar System, 3200 nearby stars, a large database, containing textual descriptions of all ob jects in a scene, interactive map of constellations and to ols for search and navigation. The metho ds, needed for visualization of di erent scale astronomical ob jects in virtual environment, are describ ed. Mo dern educational pro cess actively uses the metho ds of computer graphics and scienti c visualization. Wide opp ortunities are op ened by emerging technology of virtual environments, which can be used for a creation of high interactive virtual lab oratories intended for teaching di erent disciplines. In this pap er we describ e an exp erimental course on basics of astronomy, which is delivered inside the immersive virtual environment system CyberStage, installed at GMD, and gives a p ossibility to explore interactively the Solar System and surrounding stars. The rst section presents the virtual environment system CyberStage. The second section outlines Avango, the main software comp onent driving this sys- tem. The metho ds used for mo deling of astronomical ob jects are describ ed in the third section and summarized in conclusion. 1 Cyb erStage The CyberStage [1] is CAVE-like [2] audio-visual pro jection system. It has ro om sizes (3m3m2.4m) and integrates a 4-side stereo image pro jection and 8- channel spatial sound pro jection, b oth controlled by the p osition of the user's head, followed by a tracking system (Polhemus Fastrak sensors).
    [Show full text]
  • Holy Week and Easter 2019
    The Latin Mass Society Holy Week and Easter 2019 Westminster The Oratory, Brompton Road, LONDON SW7 2RP Palm Sunday 9.00am Low Mass Easter Sunday 9.00am Low Mass St James's, Spanish Place, LONDON W1U 3QY Palm Sunday 9.30am Low Mass Easter Sunday 9.30am Low Mass Our Lady of Willesden, Acton Lane, WILLESDEN , London NW10 9AX Palm Sunday 5.30pm Low Mass Easter Sunday 10.00am Low Mass St Mary Moorfields, Eldon Street, LONDON EC2M 7LS Spy Wednesday 6.00pm Tenebrae Maundy Thursday 6.00pm High Mass 9.00pm Tenebrae Good Friday 3.00pm Solemn Liturgy 6.00pm Tenebrae Holy Saturday 6.00pm Solemn Vigil St Edmund of Canterbury & English Martyrs, Farm Lane, Old Hall Green, Easter Sunday 3.00pm Low Mass WARE , Hertfordshire SG11 1DT Arundel and Brighton St Pancras, Ireland’s Lane, LEWES, Sussex BN7 1QX Easter Sunday 12.30pm Low Mass Our Lady of Ransom, Grange Road, EASTBOURNE BN21 4EU Palm Sunday 8.00am Low Mass St Thomas More, 54 Sutton Road, SEAFORD BN25 1SS Easter Sunday 3.00pm Low Mass Birmingham The Oratory, Hagley Road, BIRMINGHAM B16 8UE Palm Sunday 10.00am High Mass Spy Wednesday 7.30pm Tenebrae Maundy Thursday 7.30pm High Mass Good Friday 9.00am Tenebrae 3.00pm Solemn Liturgy Holy Saturday 9.00am Tenebrae 7.30pm Easter Vigil Easter Sunday 10.30am High Mass St Mary on the Hill, St Mary’s Road, WEDNESBURY WS10 9DL Easter Sunday 12 noon Low/Sung OL Perpetual Succour, Cannock Road, WOLVERHAMPTON WV10 8PG Easter Sunday 8.00am Low Mass The Oratory, Woodstock Road, OXFORD OX2 6HA Palm Sunday 8.00am Low Mass Easter Sunday 8.00am Low Mass SS Gregory
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Space Chronicle Deep Space Chronicle: a Chronology of Deep Space and Planetary Probes, 1958–2000 | Asifa
    dsc_cover (Converted)-1 8/6/02 10:33 AM Page 1 Deep Space Chronicle Deep Space Chronicle: A Chronology ofDeep Space and Planetary Probes, 1958–2000 |Asif A.Siddiqi National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA SP-2002-4524 A Chronology of Deep Space and Planetary Probes 1958–2000 Asif A. Siddiqi NASA SP-2002-4524 Monographs in Aerospace History Number 24 dsc_cover (Converted)-1 8/6/02 10:33 AM Page 2 Cover photo: A montage of planetary images taken by Mariner 10, the Mars Global Surveyor Orbiter, Voyager 1, and Voyager 2, all managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. Included (from top to bottom) are images of Mercury, Venus, Earth (and Moon), Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. The inner planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth and its Moon, and Mars) and the outer planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune) are roughly to scale to each other. NASA SP-2002-4524 Deep Space Chronicle A Chronology of Deep Space and Planetary Probes 1958–2000 ASIF A. SIDDIQI Monographs in Aerospace History Number 24 June 2002 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of External Relations NASA History Office Washington, DC 20546-0001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Siddiqi, Asif A., 1966­ Deep space chronicle: a chronology of deep space and planetary probes, 1958-2000 / by Asif A. Siddiqi. p.cm. – (Monographs in aerospace history; no. 24) (NASA SP; 2002-4524) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Space flight—History—20th century. I. Title. II. Series. III. NASA SP; 4524 TL 790.S53 2002 629.4’1’0904—dc21 2001044012 Table of Contents Foreword by Roger D.
    [Show full text]