DOCSLIB.ORG

The New Single Equality Act in Britain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The New Single Equality Act in Britain 11 The New Single Equality Act in Britain Bob Hepple1 Introduction The Equality Act 2010 was one of the last ▪ Widening the circumstances in which measures to be enacted under the Labour positive action is allowed; and ▪ A new duty on public authorities to May 2010. It is the outcome of 14 years of have due regard to socio-economic disadvan- campaigningGovernment whichby equality lost office specialists in the and U.K. hu in- tage when taking strategic decisions. man rights organisations. Remarkably, there was eventually cross-party support for near- Of course, legal models cannot simply be ly all of its provisions, and the new Conserv- transplanted from one jurisdiction to anoth- ative-Liberal Democrat Coalition Govern- er. Account has to be taken of the precise his- ment is committed to bring it into operation torical, political, and socio-economic circum- in stages from October 2010. The Act covers stances in which equality legislation is made Great Britain (England, Wales and Scotland) and enforced. This article, therefore, aims to but not Northern Ireland which has devolved explain the history and context of the British powers on these matters, and appears to be Act, and then to assess its content against the set to continue its own patchwork of anti- benchmark of the Declaration of Principles discrimination legislation rather than en- on Equality (the Declaration) launched by act a single Act, because of disagreements The Equal Rights Trust (ERT) which repre- within the power-sharing government of sents a “moral and professional consensus that province. However, Northern Ireland among human rights and equality experts.”2 It will be seen that, despite its promise, there ways to combat inequality, some of which are are still some important gaps between the has since 1989 been the pathfinder of new Act and the vision of the Declaration. Somereflected features in the of British the Act Act. may serve as a mod- 1. Five Generations of Legislation el for other countries, in particular: ▪ Adopting a unitary or integrated per- generation of equality legislation in Britain. spective of equality law enforced by a single SocialThe Equality legislation Act of 2010 this kindis part is not of thethe “gift”fifth Commission; of enlightened rulers. It is the outcome of ▪ - nation, harassment and victimisation and and competing ideologies. As Abrams has applying Clarifying them acrossthe definitions all protected of discrimi charac- said,struggles “what between any particular different group interest of peoplegroups teristics; gets is not just a matter of what they choose, ▪ Expanding positive duties on public au- but what they can force or persuade other thorities to advance equality in respect of all groups to let them have.”3 - protected characteristics; tion of British legislation was based on the The first genera The Equal Rights Review, Vol. Five (2010) 12 notion of formal equality – likes must be The third generation started with the ex- treated alike. The Race Relations Act 1965 tension of legislation to discrimination on was the response of a Labour Government grounds of sex (Equal Pay Act 1970 and Sex to campaigns by, among others, members Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA)). This had of the Movement for Colonial Freedom and long been fought for by the trade union and the Campaign Against Racial Discrimination feminist movements and the Labour and Lib- to deal with the then widespread overt dis- eral parties. The unique features of the SDA crimination against recent immigrants from 1975, passed under a Labour Government, the Caribbean and the Indian sub-continent. were the introduction of the concept of indi- The Act was a kind of quid pro quo for the - Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1962 which rowed from the USA), and provisions permit- tingrect positiveor adverse action. effects This discriminationmarked the begin (bor- immigrants to come to the U.K. It covered di- ning of a transition from formal equality to recthad maderacial it discrimination more difficult forbut Black only andin places Asian substantive equality. Moreover, there was an of public resort, such as public houses and individual right to claim compensation for hotels. It established a Race Relations Board unlawful discrimination in industrial (later which investigated complaints through con- called employment) tribunals and courts. An ciliation committees. If conciliation failed and Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) was the discrimination was likely to continue, the created to undertake strategic enforcement Board could refer the matter to the Attorney- and to assist individuals. This model was General to seek an injunction. followed in a new Race Relations Act 1976, deliberately introduced later than the SDA The second generation, the Race Relations because women’s rights were more popular Act 1968, was also a measure of formal equal- than those of ethnic minorities. There was ity. It was limited to direct racial discrimina- now a separate Commission for Racial Equal- tion but extended coverage to employment, ity (CRE) in place of the Race Relations Board housing, goods and services. Enforcement and Community Relations Commission was still through local conciliation commit- (CRC). The SDA was enacted soon after the tees, and voluntary bodies in 40 industries, UK joined the European Economic Communi- but if conciliation failed the Race Relations ty (EEC) under the Treaty of Rome which laid Board could itself bring proceedings in a des- down the principle of equal pay for women ignated county court. Campaign groups man- and men and later issued directives on equal aged to mobilise political pressure for this opportunities. There was a radical develop- new Act by commissioning two reports, one ment of European law on gender equality as a on the extent of racial discrimination (whose result of test cases brought by the EOC before existence many then denied) and the other the European Court of Justice (ECJ). A further on anti-discrimination legislation in the USA step towards substantive equality occurred and Canada. A Labour Home Secretary, Roy with the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 Jenkins, whose special adviser was Anthony (DDA). Growing political activism by disabil- Lester (later Lord Lester of Herne Hill QC, ity organisations had been seeking “rights not charity.” Disabled people increasingly the measure through Parliament, but once saw the welfarist approach as paternalistic againfirst Chair the quid of the pro Equal quo wasRights a restrictive Trust), steered Com- and oppressive. It was under a Conservative monwealth Immigrants Act 1968 to halt the Government that the 1995 Act established individual rights for disabled people to claim influx of East African Asian refugees. The Equal Rights Review, Vol. Five (2010) 13 equal treatment. It was recognised that dis- positive duties to achieve fair participation of ability discrimination is asymmetrical, and the Catholic and Protestant communities on measures to achieve substantive equality certain employers. This has resulted in sig- therefore included a duty to make reasona- ble adjustments for a disabled person. From for both Catholics and Protestants without 2000, a Disability Rights Commission (DRC) thenificant use improvementsof quotas.7 The in Northernfair employment Ireland was established. Act 1998 (implementing the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement) went further imposing The fourth generation resulted from Arti- positive duties on public bodies to have due cle 13 of the Treaty of Amsterdam (1997) regard to the need to promote equality of op- and the implementing Race Directive4 and portunity not only between Protestant and Framework Employment Directive5 (cover- Catholic communities, but also in respect of ing age, disability, religion or belief, and sex- age, disability, race, religion, sex, marital sta- ual orientation) and subsequently the Equal tus, and sexual orientation. In other words, Treatment Directive6 (covering sex). There public bodies had to mainstream equality were growing pressures within Britain for into the exercise of all their functions. This an extension of anti-discrimination legisla- approach crossed the Irish Sea to Britain in tion to the new strands from LGBT groups, 2000 in respect of race equality, following religious groups – particularly Muslims – and the inquiry into the death of a black teenager, those concerned with age discrimination. Stephen Lawrence, which exposed “institu- But without the Article 13 EC Directives it is tional racism” in the Metropolitan Police.8 unlikely that any domestic legislation would Amendments to the Race Relations Act not have been introduced at that time. A series only extended anti-discrimination law to po- of regulations implemented the Directives lice and similar functions, but also imposed between 2003 and 2007. The Government - chose to do this by secondary rather than ity duties.9 Similar public sector positive du- primary legislation, with the result that the tiesboth were general introduced and specific in respect public sector of disability equal British regulations could not go beyond the in 200510 and gender in 2007.11 provisions of the Directives. For example, the age, religion or belief and sexual orientation 2. The Campaign for a Single Act and - Single Commission scoperegulations of the hadFramework to be confined Employment to employ Direc- By 1997 when the Blair Labour Government tive.ment Despite and related the gaps fields and because shortcomings, that was thisthe was elected, anti-discrimination legislation generation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LGBT Rights at Work
    LGBT Rights at Work An advice leaflet for Usdaw Members Rights for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Workers As a result of many years of Although the Equality Act has not been enacted in Northern Ireland, similar campaigning by lesbian, gay, legislation applies protecting LGBT people bisexual and transgender from discrimination. The information in this leaflet therefore applies equally to LGBT (LGBT) organisations and members in Northern Ireland. Trade Unions, LGBT workers As well as the recent improvements in now enjoy the same rights at legal rights, social attitudes have also dramatically changed but this doesn’t mean work as their heterosexual that harassment and discrimination relating (straight) colleagues. to sexual orientation or gender identity has disappeared from our workplaces. The Equality Act, introduced in October Millions of LGBT workers still don’t feel 2010 in England, Scotland and Wales, made safe enough to be out about their sexual it unlawful for employers to discriminate orientation or gender identity at work and against someone or harass them for reasons thousands of these workers will be Usdaw relating to either their sexual orientation or members. This leaflet summarises the legal their gender identity. rights LGBT members have at work. 1 The issues Gender Identity The law also means that transgender Whilst Usdaw recognises that lesbians, gay members are fully protected from men, bisexuals and transgender members discrimination by the law. A transgender each have distinct and separate problems at person is someone who lives their life in work, they also share a range of concerns a gender different to that in which they and experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Policy 2018 – 2020
    Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Policy 2018 – 2020 1 Contents About this document................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 5 What does Equality, Diversity and Inclusion mean to the HCPC? .............................. 5 Legal duties ................................................................................................................ 6 Vision and values ....................................................................................................... 8 Equality, diversity and inclusion objectives ................................................................. 9 Setting measures ..................................................................................................... 10 Measuring success................................................................................................... 10 Accountability ........................................................................................................... 11 More Information ...................................................................................................... 13 Contact us ................................................................................................................ 13 2 About Us We are the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC). We are a regulator and we were set up to protect the public. To do this, we keep a register of professionals
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Commonwealth
    Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in The Commonwealth Struggles for Decriminalisation and Change Edited by Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in The Commonwealth: Struggles for Decriminalisation and Change Edited by Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites © Human Rights Consortium, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NCND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN 978-1-912250-13-4 (2018 PDF edition) DOI 10.14296/518.9781912250134 Institute of Commonwealth Studies School of Advanced Study University of London Senate House Malet Street London WC1E 7HU Cover image: Activists at Pride in Entebbe, Uganda, August 2012. Photo © D. David Robinson 2013. Photo originally published in The Advocate (8 August 2012) with approval of Sexual Minorities Uganda (SMUG) and Freedom and Roam Uganda (FARUG). Approval renewed here from SMUG and FARUG, and PRIDE founder Kasha Jacqueline Nabagesera. Published with direct informed consent of the main pictured activist. Contents Abbreviations vii Contributors xi 1 Human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity in the Commonwealth: from history and law to developing activism and transnational dialogues 1 Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites 2
    [Show full text]
  • Vision for Change: Acceptance Without Exception for Trans People
    A VISION FOR CHANGE Acceptance without exception for trans people 2017-2022 A VISION FOR CHANGE Acceptance without exception for trans people Produced by Stonewall Trans Advisory Group Published by Stonewall [email protected] www.stonewall.org.uk/trans A VISION FOR CHANGE Acceptance without exception for trans people 2017-2022 CONTENTS PAGE 5 INTRODUCTION FROM STONEWALL’S TRANS ADVISORY GROUP PAGE 6 INTRODUCTION FROM RUTH HUNT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE, STONEWALL PAGE 7 HOW TO READ THIS DOCUMENT PAGE 8 A NOTE ON LANGUAGE PAGE 9 EMPOWERING INDIVIDUALS: enabling full participation in everyday and public life by empowering trans people, changing hearts and minds, and creating a network of allies PAGE 9 −−THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE: o Role models o Representation of trans people in public life o Representation of trans people in media o Diversity of experiences o LGBT communities o Role of allies PAGE 11 −−VISION FOR CHANGE PAGE 12 −−STONEWALL’S RESPONSE PAGE 14 −−WHAT OTHERS CAN DO PAGE 16 TRANSFORMING INSTITUTIONS: improving services and workplaces for trans people PAGE 16 −−THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE: o Children, young people and education o Employment o Faith o Hate crime, the Criminal Justice System and support services o Health and social care o Sport PAGE 20 −−VISION FOR CHANGE PAGE 21 −−WHAT SERVICE PROVIDERS CAN DO PAGE 26 −−STONEWALL’S RESPONSE PAGE 28 −−WHAT OTHERS CAN DO PAGE 30 CHANGING LAWS: ensuring equal rights, responsibilities and legal protections for trans people PAGE 30 −−THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE: o The Gender Recognition Act o The Equality Act o Families and marriage o Sex by deception o Recording gender o Asylum PAGE 32 −−VISION FOR CHANGE PAGE 33 −−STONEWALL’S RESPONSE PAGE 34 −−WHAT OTHERS CAN DO PAGE 36 GETTING INVOLVED PAGE 38 GLOSSARY INTRODUCTION FROM STONEWALL’S TRANS ADVISORY GROUP The UK has played an While many of us benefited from the work to give a voice to all parts of trans successes of this time, many more communities, and we are determined important role in the did not.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion, the Rule of Law and Discrimination Transcript
    Religion, the Rule of Law and Discrimination Transcript Date: Thursday, 26 June 2014 - 6:00PM Location: Barnard's Inn Hall 26 June 2014 Religion, the Rule of Law and Discrimination The Rt Hon. Sir Terence Etherton Chancellor of the High Court of England and Wales 1. One of the most difficult and contentious areas of our law today is the resolution of disputes generated by a conflict between, on the one hand, the religious beliefs of an individual and, on the other hand, actions which that individual is required to take, whether that requirement is by a public body, a private employer or another individual. The problem is particularly acute where the conflict is directly or indirectly between one individual’s religious beliefs and another’s non-religious human rights.[1] 2. It is a subject that affects many countries as they have become more liberal, multicultural and secular.[2] The issues in countries which are members of the Council of Europe and of the European Union, like England and Wales, are affected by European jurisprudence as well as national law. The development of the law in England is of particular interest because the Protestant Church is the established Church of England but the protection for secular and other non-Protestant minorities has progressed at a pace and in a way that would have been beyond the comprehension of most members of society, including judges and politicians, before the Second World War. 3. This subject is large and complex and the law relevant to it is growing at a remarkably fast pace.[3] For the purpose of legal commentary, it falls naturally into two parts: (1) tracing the legal history and reasons for the developments I have mentioned, and (2) analysing the modern jurisprudence.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT History Month 2016
    Inner Temple Library LGBT History Month 2016 ‘The overall aim of LGBT History Month is to promote equality and diversity for the benefit of the public. This is done by: increasing the visibility of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (“LGBT”) people, their history, lives and their experiences in the curriculum and culture of educational and other institutions, and the wider community; raising awareness and advancing education on matters affecting the LGBT community; working to make educational and other institutions safe spaces for all LGBT communities; and promoting the welfare of LGBT people, by ensuring that the education system recognises and enables LGBT people to achieve their full potential, so they contribute fully to society and lead fulfilled lives, thus benefiting society as a whole.’ Source: www.lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/about Legal Milestones ‘[A] wallchart has been produced by the Forum for Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Equality in Further and Higher Education and a group of trade unions in association with Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) History Month. The aim has been to produce a resource to support those raising awareness of sexual orientation and gender identity equality and diversity. Centred on the United Kingdom, it highlights important legal milestones and identifies visible and significant contributions made by individuals, groups and particularly the labour movement.’ Source: www.lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/wallchart The wallchart is included in this leaflet, and we have created a timeline of important legal milestones. We have highlighted a selection of material held by the Inner Temple Library that could be used to read about these events in more detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Code of Practice: Services, Public Functions and Associations
    Equality Act 2010 Code of Practice Services, public functions and associations Statutory Code of Practice Equality Act 2010 Code of Practice Services, public functions and associations Statutory Code of Practice Equality Act 2010 Statutory Code of Practice Services, public functions and associations www.equalityhumanrights.com © Equality and Human Rights Commission (2011) The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental and agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Equality and Human Rights Commission copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at www.equalityhumanrights.com This publication is also available on www.official-documents.gov.uk ISBN: 9780108509728 ID P002411441 01/11 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Contents 01 Contents 15 Foreword 17 Chapter 1: Introduction 17 Purpose of the Equality Act 2010 18 Status of the Code 18 Scope of the Code 19 Age as a protected characteristic 20 Marriage and Civil Partnership 20 Purpose of the Code 21 Human Rights 22 Large and small service providers 22 How to use the Code 23 Examples in the Code
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Equality Act 2010 on Charities
    The Impact of the Equality Act 2010 on Charities Debra Morris, Anne Morris and Jennifer Sigafoos Charity Law & Policy Unit, School of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool Published by: Charity Law & Policy Unit University of Liverpool Liverpool L69 7ZA August 2013 website: http://www.liv.ac.uk/law/research/charity-law-and-policy/about/ © Charity Law & Policy Unit ISBN 978-0-9536666-6-9 ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 1 I Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 9 II Overview/ General Themes ......................................................................................................... 17 III The Legal Context: Charity Law ................................................................................................ 29 IV The Legal Context: Equality Laws ............................................................................................. 41 V The Legal Context: Interrelation between Charity and Equality Law ........................... 90 VI Case Studies .................................................................................................................................. 104 Religious Charities 104 Higher Education 117 Single-sex Provision 135 Challenges to Public Sector Spending Cuts 142 VII Conclusion and Recommendations ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • “Brexit and NI Employment Law – a Proposal for an NI- Specific Framework to Defend Workers’ EU Rights?” Paper by Ciaran White
    1 ‘Brexiting and Rights: Discussion seminar on the human rights and equality implications of the EU referendum’, MAC Belfast, 27th September 2016 “Brexit and NI Employment Law – a proposal for an NI- specific framework to defend workers’ EU rights?” Paper by Ciaran White Abstract One of the many issues that gives rise to concern arising from the ‘Brexit’ vote is what it will all mean for those labour law rights that have been generated or influenced by EU law. Labour Lawyers recognise freely that EU law has had a considerable influence on the development of UK employment law: prior to 1973 it was still quite common for lawyers to describe the discipline as the ‘Law of Master and Servant’, reflecting its 19th century Victorian origins. Over that period, a wide range of EU directives setting out employment- related rights and entitlements have been promulgated. These include the Acquired Rights Directive, the Pregnant Workers’ Directive, Part-Time and Fixed Term Workers’ Directive, the Parental Leave Directive, the Working Time Directive, the Employment Equality and Equal treatment Directives, to name some. Many of these have found their expression in NI law as separate NI enactments. Some examples are the Working Time Regulations (Northern Ireland), Agency Workers Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2011, Part-time Workers etc… Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2002, but the range of NI-specific EU-generated legislation is quite extensive. What will post-Brexit NI employment law look like and what will happen this 40-year-plus corpus of employment rights? What will be the status of past case law of the Court of Justice, and will future case law be relevant where EU-derived rights are retained? What will happen those rights that have been implemented by way of an UK Act of Parliament, such as the Equal Pay Act, if those Acts are repealed? The Assembly has devolved competence in the field of employment law and so is free to chart its own course, distinct from that of the rest of the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Religion and Balancing Clauses in Discrimination Law 1
    Freedom of religion and balancing clauses in discrimination law 1 Magna Carta and Freedom of Religion or Belief Conference St Hugh’s College, Oxford | 21-24 June 2015 “Freedom of Religion and Balancing Clauses in Discrimination Legislation” Neil Foster1 Introduction – Freedom of Religion as a Protected Right The right to freedom of religion, while having its origins in various sources including the Magna Carta,2 is a right protected today by all major international human rights instruments (Universal Declaration of Human Rights (art 18); International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (art 18); European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) (art 9)). Whatever definition is adopted of the term “religion”, most people recognise that religion is a matter of “ultimate concern”, something that shapes a person’s values, their understanding of the meaning of life and how they ought to behave. Any right to freedom of religion must include, as a minimum, the right to hold a particular religion or to change one’s religion. It is widely accepted that protection of religious freedom must also go beyond the protection of this internal aspect of the right to freedom of religion, and extend to the right to externally “manifest” religious beliefs in public gatherings, and the freedom to adhere to and observe one’s religious beliefs in both “religious” and “non-religious” settings. This extended concept of religious freedom is recognised in the ICCPR (art 18): Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his [or her] choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his [or her] religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Equality Bill 7 MAY 2009 Bill 85 of 2008-09
    RESEARCH PAPER 09/42 Equality Bill 7 MAY 2009 Bill 85 of 2008-09 Legislation to outlaw discrimination has existed for over 40 years. Typically, new Acts have had as their focus one area of policy, for example, pay, equal treatment of women, race discrimination etc. Almost inevitably, the body of current law, introduced piece meal over such a long period, has developed inconsistencies of both content and approach. As well as introducing new requirements one of the main aims of this Bill is to harmonise existing law into a more coherent whole. Vincent Keter BUSINESS & TRANSPORT SECTION WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM, LOUISE BUTCHER, RICHARD CRACKNELL, TIMOTHY EDMONDS, OONAGH GAY, CHRISTINE GILLIE, HELEN HOLDEN, ALEX HORNE, SUE HUBBLE, RICHARD KELLY, STEVEN KENNEDY, ADAM MELLOWS- FACER, VAUGHNE MILLAR, BRYN MORGAN, JO ROLL, LOUISE SMITH, DJUNA THURLEY AND WENDY WILSON HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: List of 15 most recent RPs 09/27 Coroners and Justice Bill: Committee Stage Report 19.03.09 09/28 Geneva Conventions and United Nations Personnel 20.03.09 (Protocols) Bill [HL] [Bill 69 of 2008-09] 09/29 Members’ pay and the independent review process 31.03.09 09/30 Economic Indicators, April 2009 08.04.09 09/31 Members since 1979 20.04.09 09/32 Unemployment by Constituency, March 2009 22.04.09 09/33 Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill: Committee 23.04.09 Stage Report 09/34 The financial crisis in the US: key events, causes and responses 23.04.09 09/35 Russia’s Military Posture 24.04.09 09/36 Russia and
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Equality and Diversity in London
    Planning Guidance to the London Plan the London to Planning Guidance Supplementary Planning Guidance y ober 2007 Oct Planning for Equality and Diversity in London Planning for Supplementar Supplementary Planning Guidance Planning for Equality and Diversity in London MoL/Aug 07/MR D&P/GLA 989 020 7983 4100 020 7983 4458 ati www.london.gov.uk Hindi Bengali Arabic Gujar .uk 020 7983 4100 020 7983 4458 .london.gov w w w Enquiries Minicom urkish ondon SE1 2AA City Hall Walk The Queen’s L T Vietnamese GreekPunjabi Urdu Chinese If you would like a summary of this document in your language, please If you would like above. us at the address phone the number or contact You will need to supply your name, your postal address and state the and state supply your name, your postal address will need to You and title of the publication you require. format London SE1 2AA London Greater London Authority London Greater City Hall Walk The Queen’s Telephone Minicom Public Liaison Unit For a large print, Braille, disc, print, Braille, a large sign language video or audio-tape version For below: us at the address of this document, please contact Other formats and languages Other formats Planning for Equality and Diversity in London Supplementary Planning Guidance to the London Plan October 2007 Copyright Greater London Authority October 2007 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 978 1 84781 068 7 Photographs © Hayley Madden (pages 43, 44, 58, 90, 94), James O Jenkins (page 112), Liane Harris (page 3), Adam Hinton (page 6), Philip Wolmuth (pages 17 and 62), Nicki Tucker (page 52), TfL Visual Image Service (page 80), Visit London (page 87) and Belinda Lawley (all other images).
    [Show full text]