Où Va L'économie ? Revue De L'ofce

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Où Va L'économie ? Revue De L'ofce Revue de l’OFCE 153 Modèles Décembre 2017 Réformes Interactions StagnationS séculaire InstabilitéIn Consensus Histoire économiquee Environnement Modélisation Épargne Inégalitésés ProductivitéP Emploi Long terme Crisee Divergence Politiques Fiscalité Zone euro Informationn Innovations Progrès HistoireH CroissanceCii Rigidités Crise technique Entreprises Crédit Où va l’économie ? Cycles Emploi Dépensesp publiques Consensus Crédit Modèless Rationalité Hétérogénéité Instabilité Politiques InstabilitéFinance Stagnation MonnaieM e InformationI Chocs Entreprises séculaire Équilibres PolitiquesP économiques Crise Cliométrie Politiques Productivité Rationalité Borne Zéro Agents Progrès technique Zone euro Fluctuations Inégalités Narration Consensus Crisee Croissance Revue de l’OFCE OFCE L’Observatoire français des conjonctures économiques est un organisme indépendant de prévision, de recherche et d’évaluation des politiques publiques. Créé par une convention passée entre l'État et la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques approuvée par le décret n° 81.175 du 11 février 1981, l'OFCE regroupe plus de 40 chercheurs (es) français et étrangers. « Mettre au service du débat public en économie les fruits de la rigueur scientifique et de l’indépendance universitaire », telle est la mission que l’OFCE remplit en conduisant des travaux théoriques et empiriques, en participant aux réseaux scientifiques internationaux, en assurant une présence régulière dans les médias et en coopérant étroitement avec les pouvoirs publics français et européens. Philippe Weil a présidé l’OFCE de 2011 à 2013, à la suite de Jean-Paul Fitoussi, qui a succédé en 1989 au fondateur de l'OFCE, Jean-Marcel Jeanneney. Depuis 2014, Xavier Ragot préside l’OFCE. Il est assisté d'un conseil scientifique qui délibère sur l'orientation de ses travaux et l'utilisation des moyens. Président Xavier Ragot. Direction Jérôme Creel, Estelle Frisquet, Éric Heyer, Lionel Nesta, Xavier Timbeau. Comité de rédaction Guillaume Allègre, Luc Arrondel, Frédérique Bec, Christophe Blot, Carole Bonnet, Julia Cagé, Ève Caroli, Virginie Coudert, Anne-Laure Delatte, Brigitte Dormont, Bruno Ducoudré, Michel Forsé, Guillaume Gaulier, Sarah Guillou, Florence Legros, Éloi Laurent, Mauro Napoletano, Hélène Périvier, Mathieu Plane, Franck Portier, Corinne Prost, Romain Rancière et Raul Sampognaro. Publication Xavier Ragot, directeur de la publication. Sandrine Levasseur, rédactrice en chef Laurence Duboys Fresney, secrétaire de rédaction Najette Moummi, responsable de la fabrication. Contact OFCE l 10, place de Catalogne 75014 Paris Tel. : +33(0)1 44 18 54 24 web : www.ofce.sciences-po.fr Dépôt légal : janvier 2018 ISBN : 979-10-90994-04-1 N° ISSN 1265-9576 – ISSN en ligne 1777-5647 – © OFCE 2018 Sommaire OÙ VA L’ÉCONOMIE ? Où va l’économie ? . 5 Xavier Ragot Où en est l’histoire économique ? Entre narration et quantification . 19 Pamfili Antipa, Vincent Bignon Croissance de long terme et tendances de la productivité Stagnation séculaire ou simple trou d'air ? . 43 Antonin Bergeaud, Gilbert Cette, Rémy Lecat Progrès technique et croissance depuis la crise . 63 Philippe Aghion, Céline Antonin La macroéconomie à l'heure de la stagnation séculaire . 79 Gilles Le Garrec, Vincent Touzé Les inégalités dans les modèles macroéconomiques . 105 Cecilia García-Peñalosa Macroéconomie et environnement . 133 Katheline Schubert État de la macroéconomie environnementale appliquée . 151 Gissela Landa Rivera, Paul Malliet, Aurélien Saussay, Frédéric Reynès L'étude des fluctuations macroéconomiques est-elle « scientifique » ? . 171 Édouard Challe L’hiver de notre mécontentement : la macroéconomie après la crise 187 Rodolphe Dos Santos Ferreira Macroéconomie et information imparfaite . 201 Paul Hubert, Giovanni Ricco Finance et macroéconomie : la prépondérance du cycle financier . 221 Michel Aglietta L'instabilité des économies de marché . 253 Franck Portier Vers une macroéconomie non-walrasienne . 265 Jean-Luc Gaffard Revue de l’OFCE, 153 (2017) Les modèles multi-agents et leurs conséquences pour l’analyse macroéconomique . 289 Mauro Napoletano Sur les modèles macroéconomiques . 317 Olivier Blanchard Que doit faire la politique monétaire face aux emballements du prix des actifs et au développement du crédit ? . 327 Anne Épaulard Quelles sont les difficultés essentielles de la zone euro ? . 345 Patrick Artus La fin du Consensus ? La crise économique et la crise de la macroéconomie . 365 Francesco Saraceno Les propos des auteurs et les opinions qu’ils expriment n’engagent qu’eux-mêmes et non les institutions auxquelles ils appartiennent. Présentation générale OÙ VA L’ÉCONOMIE ? Xavier Ragot OFCE, Sciences Po Paris L’économie mondiale sort péniblement de la crise financière, commencée en 2008 aux États-Unis avant de venir secouer l’Europe. S’extirpant des urgences de la crise, le débat économique regarde maintenant des horizons plus éloignés. Le réchauffement climatique demande aujourd’hui des investissements dans des technologies nouvelles et des changements de mode de consom- mation. De manière plus générale, les tendances actuelles reposent à nouveau la vieille question, mais toujours d’actualité, de la stabi- lité économique et sociale des économies de marché. Cette dernière contient de nombreuses ramifications : à la question de l’instabilité et des crises financières s’ajoute celle de la dynamique des inégalités et de la répartition du revenu. Enfin, le changement technique, avec l’émergence des technologies numériques, suscite de nouvelles interrogations. Si les potentialités numériques sont souvent formulées de manière anxiogène, la capacité de ces tech- nologies à améliorer notre quotidien fait partie des questions essentielles pour penser l’économie dans vingt ans. À ces nouvelles questions correspondent des évolutions dans la recherche économique, dont ce numéro de La Revue de l’OFCE souhaite rendre compte en présentant les recherches récentes et les questions ouvertes. Ce numéro est composé de contributions écrites par des auteurs tous spécialistes de leur sujet. Ils ont pu écrire des textes où la pensée, certes argumentée, pouvait faire place à des considérations personnelles que les contraintes de la rigueur académique ne permettent pas toujours d’exprimer : les mécontentements et les enthousiasmes sont instructifs pour Revue de l’OFCE, 153 (2017) 6 Xavier Ragot observer la pensée en train de se faire. Les auteurs des contributions se sont attachés à présenter les résultats robustes et les questions nouvelles. Ce numéro a donc pour but de transmettre autant un savoir que des interrogations. Certains économistes ont récemment affirmé que l’économie avait maintenant le statut scientifique des sciences expérimentales. Cette affirmation contient une part de vérité : on comprend beaucoup de choses sur les dynamiques sociales avec le regard de l’économiste, et il est de la responsabilité du chercheur d’intervenir dans le débat public pour aider chacun à être mieux informé des conséquences de ses choix. Cependant, cette affirma- tion est bien trop forte et n’informe pas le public des incertitudes et débats au sein des économistes académiques. Les dix-huit contributions ne sont pas exhaustives mais couvrent la plus grande partie des débats actuels, avec un regard spécifique sur les questions macroéconomiques. À la diversité des sujets traités par chacune des contributions s’ajoute la différence de « séniorité » dans la discipline, le jeune chercheur voulant déplacer la frontière du savoir dans une direction précise côtoie le chercheur plus expérimenté présentant une version plus topogra- phique de la discipline, en décrivant ce que l’on sait déjà. Le but de cette introduction n’est pas de se substituer à la lecture de ces textes, tous instructifs et éclairants, mais d’en dégager des points d’intersection ou des sentiers divergents aussi bien en termes de méthodes que de mesures de politiques économiques. Quatre thèmes se dégagent. Le premier est la relation entre économie et histoire. Le second est la question de la stabilité des économies de marché. Le troisième est le besoin de repenser la cohérence des politiques économiques en lien notamment avec les instabilités et divergences économiques et sociales de nos écono- mies. Enfin, le quatrième thème concerne l’évolution des outils et méthodes des économistes. Le temps de l’économie : Économie et Histoire pour penser tendances et crises À la lecture de ces textes, ce qui marque est tout d’abord le retour au temps historique et à l’histoire économique. C’est face à l’histoire qu’une situation devient événement, un cycle ou révéla- Présentation générale. Où va l’économie ? 7 teur d’une tendance. En effet, ce numéro montre la richesse de l’analyse du temps historique sur les sujets qui animent les débats économiques. Ainsi, un grand débat qui divise les économistes est celui de la croissance et du progrès technique. Dans le temps long que décrivent Antonin Bergeaud, Gilbert Cette et Rémy Lecat, on observe un ralentissement progressif de la productivité et du progrès technique qui laisse planer le risque d’une croissance faible, voire d’une stagnation séculaire. Cela fait contraste avec l’accélération apparente du progrès technique dû aux technologies numériques. Trois explications sont présentées dans ce numéro. La première, défendue par Céline Antonin et Philippe Aghion, voit dans le débat sur la stagnation séculaire un pessimisme mal fondé. En premier lieu, des erreurs de mesure ne rendent pas compte du changement en cours de la nature de la croissance. En second
Recommended publications
  • Friday, June 21, 2013 the Failures That Ignited America's Financial
    Friday, June 21, 2013 The Failures that Ignited America’s Financial Panics: A Clinical Survey Hugh Rockoff Department of Economics Rutgers University, 75 Hamilton Street New Brunswick NJ 08901 [email protected] Preliminary. Please do not cite without permission. 1 Abstract This paper surveys the key failures that ignited the major peacetime financial panics in the United States, beginning with the Panic of 1819 and ending with the Panic of 2008. In a few cases panics were triggered by the failure of a single firm, but typically panics resulted from a cluster of failures. In every case “shadow banks” were the source of the panic or a prominent member of the cluster. The firms that failed had excellent reputations prior to their failure. But they had made long-term investments concentrated in one sector of the economy, and financed those investments with short-term liabilities. Real estate, canals and railroads (real estate at one remove), mining, and cotton were the major problems. The panic of 2008, at least in these ways, was a repetition of earlier panics in the United States. 2 “Such accidental events are of the most various nature: a bad harvest, an apprehension of foreign invasion, the sudden failure of a great firm which everybody trusted, and many other similar events, have all caused a sudden demand for cash” (Walter Bagehot 1924 [1873], 118). 1. The Role of Famous Failures1 The failure of a famous financial firm features prominently in the narrative histories of most U.S. financial panics.2 In this respect the most recent panic is typical: Lehman brothers failed on September 15, 2008: and … all hell broke loose.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Role of the European Shadow Banking System in the Development and Evolution of Our Monetary Institutions
    CITYPERC Working Paper Series The Historical Role of the European Shadow Banking System in the Development and Evolution of Our Monetary Institutions Israel Cedillo Lazcano CITYPERC Working Paper No. 2013-05 City Political Economy Research Centre [email protected] / @cityperc City, University of London Northampton Square London EC1V 0HB United Kingdom The Historical Role of the European Shadow Banking System in the Development and Evolution of Our Monetary Institutions Israel Cedillo Lazcano* Abstract When we hear about the 2008 Lehman Brothers crisis, immediately we relate it to the concept of “shadow banking system”; however, the credit intermediation involving lightly regulated entities and activities outside the traditional banking system are not new for the European Financial Systems, after all, many innovations developed in the past, were adopted by European nations and exported to the rest of the world (i.e. coinage and central banking), and European innovators unleashed several financial crises related to “shadowy” financial intermediaries (i.e. the Gebroeders de Neufville crisis of 1763). However, despite not many academics, legislators and regulators even agree on what “shadow banking” is, this latter does not refer exclusively to the functions of credit intermediation and maturity transformation. This concept also refers to the creation of assets such as digital media of exchange which are designed under the influence of Friedrich Hayek and the Austrian School of Economics. This lack of a uniform definition of “shadow banking” has limited our regulatory efforts on key issues like the private money creation, a source of vulnerability in the financial system that, paradoxically, at the same time could result in an opportunity to renovate European institutions, heirs of the tradition of the Wisselbank and the Bank of England which, during the seventeenth century, faced monetary innovations and led the European monetary revolution that originated the current monetary and regulatory practices implemented around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series International Borrowing
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES INTERNATIONAL BORROWING CYCLES: A NEW HISTORICAL DATABASE Graciela L. Kaminsky Working Paper 22819 http://www.nber.org/papers/w22819 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 November 2016 I gratefully acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (Award No 1023681) and the Institute for New Economic Thinking (Grant No INO14-00009). I want to thank Katherine Carpenter, Samuel Mackey, Jeffrey Messina, Andrew Olenski, and Pablo Vega-García for superb research assistance. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2016 by Graciela L. Kaminsky. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. International Borrowing Cycles: A New Historical Database Graciela L. Kaminsky NBER Working Paper No. 22819 November 2016 JEL No. F30,F34,F65 ABSTRACT The ongoing slowdown in international capital flows has brought again to the attention the booms and bust cycles in international borrowing. Many suggest that capital flow bonanzas are excessive, ending in crises. One of the most frequently mentioned culprits are the cycles of monetary easing and tightening in the financial centers. More recently, the 2008 Subprime Crisis in the United States has also been blamed for the retrenchment in capital flows to both developed and developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundations of the Valuation of Insurance Liabilities
    The foundations of the valuation of insurance liabilities Philipp Keller 14 April 2016 Audit. Tax. Consulting. Financial Advisory. Content • The importance and complexity of valuation • The basics of valuation • Valuation and risk • Market consistent valuation • The importance of consistency of market consistency • Financial repression and valuation under pressure • Hold-to-maturity • Conclusions and outlook 2 The foundations of the valuation of insurance liabilities The importance and complexity of valuation 3 The foundations of the valuation of insurance liabilities Valuation Making or breaking companies and nations Greece: Creative accounting and valuation and swaps allowed Greece to satisfy the Maastricht requirements for entering the EUR zone. Hungary: To satisfy the Maastricht requirements, Hungary forced private pension-holders to transfer their pensions to the public pension fund. Hungary then used this pension money to plug government debts. Of USD 15bn initially in 2011, less than 1 million remained at 2013. This approach worked because the public pension fund does not have to value its liabilities on an economic basis. Ireland: The Irish government issued a blanket state guarantee to Irish banks for 2 years for all retail and corporate accounts. Ireland then nationalized Anglo Irish and Anglo Irish Bank. The total bailout cost was 40% of GDP. US public pension debt: US public pension debt is underestimated by about USD 3.4 tn due to a valuation standard that grossly overestimates the expected future return on pension funds’ asset. (FT, 11 April 2016) European Life insurers: European life insurers used an amortized cost approach for the valuation of their life insurance liability, which allowed them to sell long-term guarantee products.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Prevent a Banking Panic: the Barings Crisis of 1890
    How to Prevent a Banking Panic: the Barings Crisis of 1890 Financial histories have treated the Barings Crisis of 1890 as a minor or pseudo-crisis with no threat to the systems of payment and settlement. New evidence reveals that Baring Brothers was not simply suffering from a temporary liquidity problem but was an insolvent institution. Just as knowledge of its true condition was revealed and a full-scale panic was about to ignite, the Bank of England stepped in: but it did not respond as Bagehot recommended---and is generally believed. Instead of waiting for the panic to break and then lending freely at a high rate on good collateral, the Bank organized a pre-emptive lifeboat operation. A large domestic financial crisis was avoided, while effective steps were taken to mitigate the effects of moral hazard from this discretionary intervention. Eugene N. White Rutgers University and NBER Department of Economics New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA [email protected] Economic History Association September 16-18, 2016 0 Since the failure of Northern Rock in the U.K. and the collapse of Baer Sterns, Lehman Brothers and AIG in the U.S. in 2007-2008, arguments have intensified over whether central banks should follow a Bagehot-style policy in a financial crisis or intervene to save a failing SIFI (systemically important financial institution). In this debate, the experience of central banks during the classical gold standard is regarded as crucially informative. Most scholars have concluded that the Bank of England eliminated panics by strictly following Walter Bagehot’s dictum in Lombard Street (1873) to lend freely at a high rate of interest on good collateral in a crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Prevent a Banking Panic: the Barings Crisis of 1890
    How to Prevent a Banking Panic: the Barings Crisis of 1890 Eugene N. White Rutgers University and NBER Department of Economics New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA [email protected] 175 Years of The Economist A Conference on Economics and the Media London, September 24-25, 2015 0 Since the failure of Northern Rock in the U.K. and the collapse of Baer Sterns, Lehman Brothers and AIG in the U.S. in 2007-2008, arguments have intensified over whether central banks should follow a Bagehot-style policy in a financial crisis or intervene to save a failing SIFI (systemically important financial institution). In this debate, the experience of central banks during the classical gold standard is regarded as crucially informative. Most scholars have concluded that the Bank of England eliminated panics by strictly following Walter Bagehot’s dictum in Lombard Street (1873) to lend freely at a high rate of interest on good collateral in a crisis. This paper re-examines the first major threat to British financial stability after the publication of Lombard Street, the Barings Crisis of 1890. Previous financial histories have treated it as a minor crisis, arising from a temporary liquidity problem that posed no threat to the systems of payment and settlement. However, contemporaries believed that a panic would engulf the financial system if Baring Brothers & Co., Britain’s second largest merchant/investment bank and a highly interconnected global institution, collapsed. New evidence reveals that this SIFI was a deeply insolvent bank whose true condition was obscured in the effort to halt a panic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Reserve's Response to the Global Financial Crisis In
    Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute Working Paper No. 209 http://www.dallasfed.org/assets/documents/institute/wpapers/2014/0209.pdf Unprecedented Actions: The Federal Reserve’s Response to the Global Financial Crisis in Historical Perspective* Frederic S. Mishkin Columbia University and National Bureau of Economic Research Eugene N. White Rutgers University and National Bureau of Economic Research October 2014 Abstract Interventions by the Federal Reserve during the financial crisis of 2007-2009 were generally viewed as unprecedented and in violation of the rules---notably Bagehot’s rule---that a central bank should follow to avoid the time-inconsistency problem and moral hazard. Reviewing the evidence for central banks’ crisis management in the U.S., the U.K. and France from the late nineteenth century to the end of the twentieth century, we find that there were precedents for all of the unusual actions taken by the Fed. When these were successful interventions, they followed contingent and target rules that permitted pre- emptive actions to forestall worse crises but were combined with measures to mitigate moral hazard. JEL codes: E58, G01, N10, N20 * Frederic S. Mishkin, Columbia Business School, 3022 Broadway, Uris Hall 817, New York, NY 10027. 212-854-3488. [email protected]. Eugene N. White, Rutgers University, Department of Economics, New Jersey Hall, 75 Hamilton Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901. 732-932-7363. [email protected]. Prepared for the conference, “The Federal Reserve System’s Role in the Global Economy: An Historical Perspective” at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, September 18-19, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Remedy of Financial Crises and Bank Failures
    The author Michael Schemmann Michael Sche is a professional banker, certified public accountant, and university professor of accounting and finance. The book reviews a long litany of financial crises and bank failures since the 3rd century right up to the ongoing Global Financial Crisis. The author analyzes the financial statement mmann of a large international commercial bank in Frankfurt, Germany, and concludes that IFRS accounting principles and standards are not followed but violated, rendering the statements rather false and misleading. The book contains a remedy to end the Global Financial Crisis and prevent future crises, calling on the European Central Bank to step in and take over the role of money Money creator which is currently done by the private commercial banks, and allow governments to buy-back their general Breakdown and government debt theld by the banks, thereby reducing the MON outstanding sovereign debt of the euro area by 32% while improving the banks' liquidity sevenfold in a way that is Breakthrough completely inflation-neutral (sterile). The misconceived EY austerity programs 'to save the euro' can then be rolled back and abandoned. Br iicpa eak do The History and Remedy IICPA Publications wn and Br 1st Edition - 31 October 2013 of Financial Crises and ISBN 978-1492920595 eak Bank Failures thr ough IICPA PUBLICATIONS Money. Breakdown and Breakthrough. The History and Modern states gave control of monetary policy and markets to the Remedy of Financial Crises and Bank Failures. (1st Edition.) barons of global finance. The experiment has resulted in the same By Michael Schemmann disastrous outcomes as before.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Praet: Deleveraging and Monetary Policy
    Peter Praet: Deleveraging and monetary policy Speech by Peter Praet, Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank, at the Hyman P Minsky Conference, organised by the Levy Economics Institute and ECLA of Bard with support from the Ford Foundation, The German Marshall Fund of the United States, and Deutsche Bank AG, Berlin, 26 November 2012. * * * I would like to thank Philippine Cour-Thimann, Federic Holm-Hadulla and Roberto Motto for their contributions to the preparation of this speech. It is a great pleasure to join you on the occasion of the Levy Economics Institute’s Hyman P. Minsky Conference. The financial crisis erupted five years ago when the leverage cycle that had accompanied the “great moderation” abruptly reversed. Since then, the euro area and large parts of the global economy have been swept by several waves of financial shocks. And each wave has unleashed strong deleveraging forces throughout the affected economies. Deleveraging often reflects a necessary adjustment process. And it does not necessarily warrant policy intervention. At the same time, it bears the risk of becoming abrupt and disorderly, thus threatening price stability by dislodging the provision of credit and the transmission of monetary policy signals to the real economy. In the worst case, it may lead to a full-blown financial meltdown via self-sustained adverse feedback loops of the kind envisioned by Hyman P. Minsky. Central banks have a role in ensuring that the economy does not move towards divergent dynamics that would be inconsistent with price stability. To this end, they have a range of policy tools at their command which may be used to control deleveraging pressures.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do We Really Know About the Long-Term Evolution of Central Banking?
    What Do We Really Know about the Long-Term Evolution of Central Banking? Stefano Ugolini * This draft: March 31, 2013 Abstract: This paper surveys the evolution of central banking by taking a functional, instead of an institutional approach. It covers the provision of both microeconomic (financial stability) and macroeconomic (monetary stability) central banking functions in the West since the Middle Ages. The existence of a number of trends as well as the importance of political economy are underlined. The findings have implications for the current debate on the institutional design of central banking. Being the outcome of collective bargaining, monetary authorities must sit on a credible institutional equilibrium with fiscal authorities. This equilibrium, however, does not necessarily coincide with central bank independence. JEL: E42, E50, G21, N10, N20. Keywords: Central banking, monetary policy, financial stability, institutional design. * University of Toulouse (Institute of Political Studies and LEREPS). Contact: [email protected] . This paper originates from a presentation on the subject “Writing Central Bank and Monetary History”, given at the Bank of Norway in the context of Norges Bank’s Bicentenary Project. The author is very grateful to Øyvind Eitrheim and Jan F. Qvigstad for their encouragement to embark into this project. For their useful comments and suggestions, many thanks are also due to all participants to presentations at the Ninth Conference of the European Historical Economics Society (Dublin), the Annual Conference of the Economic History Society (Oxford), and the Paolo Baffi Seminar at Bocconi University (Milan) – and in particular, to Vincent Bignon, Marta Borgo, Donato Masciandaro, Robert McCauley, Pilar Nogués-Marco, and François Velde.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix for Online Publication Reshaping Global Trade: the Immediate and Long-Run Effects of Bank Failures
    Appendix for Online Publication Reshaping Global Trade: The Immediate and Long-Run Effects of Bank Failures Table of Contents A Additional Tables 2 B Additional Figures 7 C Additional historical context 15 C.1 Trade finance . 15 C.2 Overend & Gurney . 18 C.3 London banking crisis . 24 C.4 Non-failed bank response . 30 C.5 Measurement error from bills data . 31 C.6 Narrative evidence on bank failures . 37 D Instrument derivation & validity 40 E Conceptual framework 42 F Robustness 48 F.1 Immediate effects . 48 F.2 Long-run effects . 56 G Data sources & definitions 73 G.1 Index of variables . 73 G.2 Data constructed . 73 G.3 Data collected . 75 G.4 Country abbreviations . 76 G.5 Other references . 77 1 A Additional Tables Table A1: Bank-level relationship between failure and credit supply ∆ Creditb (1) (2) (3) (4) Failureb -0.782*** -0.869*** -0.961*** -0.946*** [0.109] [0.126] [0.141] [0.157] Weighting none Capital, 1865 Trade credit, 1865 Size, 1865 N 31 31 31 31 Adj. R2 0.398 0.413 0.638 0.488 Notes: Table A1 shows the regression results for the pseudo first stage relationship between bank failure and the credit supplied. The dependent variable is the percent change in the trade credit supply of individual banks reported in bi-annual balance sheets. Banks that failed are given a trade credit supply of 0 in the post-crisis period. There are 31 banks that report the composition of their balance sheet with this information. Column 1 reports the baseline, unweighted regression.
    [Show full text]
  • Lombard Street
    THE MONEY MARKET. Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis y i y v v Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis LOMBARD STREET \Description of the <3&oney <J&arket. by WALTER BAGEHOT rwith a new INTRODUCTION by Frank C. Genovese Batson SE^J 2 2 IX/ FtDERAL RESUVE BANK OF NEW YORK HYPERION PRESS, INC. Westport, Connecticut Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Published in 1962 by Richard D. Irwin. Inc., Homewood, III. Introduction Copyright. 1962, by Richard D. Irwin. Inc. Reprinted by permission ol* the copyright owner. Hyperion reprint edition 1979 Library of Congress Catalog Number 78-59001 ISBN 0-88355-677-4 Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Bagehot, Walter, 1826-1877. Lombard Streep Reprint of the 1962 ed, published by R. I>. Irwin, Home­ wood. III. I. Banks and banking—England—London. 2. Banks and banking—Great Britain. 3. Finance—England—Lon­ don. 4. Finance—Great Britain. I. Title. [HG3000.L82B3 I979bj 332.1 'I '09421 78-59001 ISBN 0-88355-677-4 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis INTRODUCTION by Frank C. Genovese C e n r a l b a n k in g , the art of tht banker’s bank, has grown out of a troubled past. Its stages of evolution are marked by three great docu­ ments, Lombard Street, the Macmillan Report, and the Radcliffe Report. Each of these arose out of the accumulated concern with the progress of events in the world.
    [Show full text]