DOCSLIB.ORG

California Marine Life Protection Act Initiative Central Coast Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California Marine Life Protection Act Initiative Central Coast Project California Marine Life Protection Act Initiative Central Coast Project Candidate MPA Package A MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force November 29-30, 2005 Meeting Overview MPA Package A OVERVIEW OF CANDIDATE MPA PACKAGES Package Name: CCRSG PACKAGE A Type of MPA # Proposed Area (sq. mi) % of Study Region State Marine Reserve 14 130.6 11.36% State Marine Park 3 12.49 1.09% State Marine 7 78.41 6.82% Conservation Area All MPAs combined 24 221.50 19.26% Individual MPAs in Package: Año Nuevo State Marine Reserve (6.59 sq. mi.) Año Nuevo State Marine Conservation Area (21.33 sq. mi.) Sand Hill Bluff State Marine Reserve (13.67 sq. mi.) Elkhorn Slough State Marine Reserve (1.36 sq. mi.) Soquel Canyon State Marine Conservation Area (9.85 sq. mi.) Portuguese Ledge State Marine Reserve (5.30 sq. mi.) Monterey Shale Beds State Marine Park (1.13 sq. mi.) Edward F. Ricketts State Marine Conservation Area (1.14 sq. mi.) Hopkins State Marine Reserve (0.15 sq. mi.) Pacific Grove State Marine Conservation Area (1.74 sq. mi.) Cypress Pinnacles State Marine Reserve (0.99 sq. mi.) Carmel Bay State Marine Park (1.93 sq. mi.) Point Lobos State Marine Reserve (5.47 sq. mi.) Point Lobos State Marine Conservation Area (12.21 sq. mi.) Big Sur State Marine Reserve (53.80 sq. mi.) Big Creek State Marine Reserve (1.57 sq. mi.) Big Creek State Marine Conservation Area (6.91 sq. mi.) Piedras Blancas State Marine Reserve (12.97 sq. mi.) Cambria State Marine Park (9.26 sq. mi.) Cambria State Marine Reserve (3.39 sq. mi.) Morro Bay State Marine Reserve (0.81 sq. mi.) Point Buchon State Marine Reserve (4.29 sq. mi.) Pt. Sal State Marine Reserve (21.92 sq. mi.) Pt. Arguello State Marine Conservation Area (39.31 sq. mi.) 1 Pigeon Point External Package A: North Central Coast Study Region Point Ano Nuevo SANTA CRUZ COUNTY Ano Nuevo - SMR Marine Life Protection Act Ano Nuevo - SMCA SANTA CLARA Central Coast Study ReCgOioUNnTY MPA Candidate Array Davenport SMCA Santa Cruz Capitola SMP 0 5 10 SMR Miles Sand Hill Bluff - SMR Watsonville Soquel Canyon - SMCA SAN BENITO COUNTY Elk Horn Slough - SMR Inset: Monterey - Carmel Portuguese Ledge - SMR Marina Pacific Grove Edward F. Pacific Grove SMCA Ricketts SMCA SMR Edward F. Ricketts - SMR Monterey Bay Shale Beds - SMP Hopkins - SMR Hopkins - SMR Cypress Pinnacles Monterey SMR Monterey Bay Carmel Shale Beds - SMP Carmel Bay - SMP Point Lobos Point Lobos SMR Cypress Pinnacles SMCA SMR Carmel Bay - SMP Soledad Hurricane Point Point Lobos Point Lobos SMR SMCA Point Sur MONTEREY COUNTY Grimes Point Big Sur - SMR Big Creek - SMR Big Creek - SMCA Lopez Point 1 grid block = 1 sq. Statute Mile Central Coast Study Region 11/18/2005 External Package A: South Central Coast Study Region Marine Life Protection Act Point Piedras Blancas SAN LUIS OBISPO Central Coast Study Region COUNTY San Simeon Point MPA Candidate Array Piedras Blancas - SMR Paso Robles SMCA SMP 0 5 10 Cambria - SMP SMR Miles Cambria - SMR Point Estero Morro Bay Inset: Morro Bay Morro Bay Estuary - SMR San Luis Obispo Point Buchon Morro Bay Point Buchon - SMR Morro Bay Estuary Pismo Beach SMR Guadalupe Point Sal Point Sal - SMR Purisima Point SANTA BARBARA COUNTY Lompoc Point Arguello 1 grid block = 1 sq. Statute Mile Point Arguello - SMCA Central Coast Study Region Point Conception 11/18/2005 MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force November 29-30, 2005 Meeting Summary of MPAs within Candidate MPA Package A Summary of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) within Candidate MPA External Package A Number and Type of MPAs in Package: 14 State Marine Reserves (SMRs), 3 State Marine Parks (SMPs), 7 State Marine Conservation Areas (SMCAs), TOTAL: 24 MPAs Total Area of MPAs in Package (sq. mi.): 237 mi2 Modification Regional Goals, to Existing MPA Name (concept file Area Alongshore Objectives, and Design Central Allowed/ Disallowed Uses name) (sq. mi.) span (mi) Criteria toward which this Coast MPA MPA contributes or new MPA? Año Nuevo State Marine 6.59 7.0 New MPA No take Goal 1, Obj. 3, 4 Reserve Goal 2, Obj. 1, 2 Goal 3, Obj. 1, 3 (AñoNuevo_SMR) Goal 4, Obj. 2 Goal 6 Año Nuevo State Marine 21.33 7.0 New MPA Allowed: Commercial and Goal 2, Obj. 1, 2, 3 Conservation Area recreational pelagic trolling, purse seine fishing (AñoNuevo_SMCA) Sand Hill Bluff State Marine 13.67 3.1 New MPA No take Goal 1 – Obj. 3, 4, 5 Reserve Goal 4 - Obj. 2 Goal 5 - Obj. 1 (SandHillBluff_SMR) Goal 6 Design Considerations: 4 Elkhorn Slough State Marine 1.36 7.0 Existing MPA No Take Goal 1 - Obj.1, 2, 4 Reserve Goal 3 - Obj.1, 2 Goal 4 - Obj.1, 2 (ElkhornSlough_SMR) 1 MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force November 29-30, 2005 Meeting Summary of MPAs within Candidate MPA Package A Modification Regional Goals, to Existing MPA Name (concept file Area Alongshore Objectives, and Design Central Allowed/ Disallowed Uses name) (sq. mi.) span (mi) Criteria toward which this Coast MPA MPA contributes or new MPA? Soquel Canyon State Marine 9.85 4.6 New MPA Allowed: recreational and Goal 2 Conservation Area commercial salmon and Goal 5 - Obj. 1 albacore trolling and Goal 6 (SoquelCanyon_SMCA) commercial spot prawn trapping only Portuguese Ledge State 5.30 3.3 New MPA No take Goal 1 - Obj. 3, 4, 5 Marine Reserve Goal 2 - Obj. 1, 2 Goal 4 - Obj. 2 (PortugueseLedge_SMR) Goal 5 - Obj. 1 Goal 6 Monterey Shale Beds State 1.13 1.1 New MPA Recreational fishing except for Goal 3 - Obj. 1, 2 Marine Park groundfish. Goal 4 - Obj. 2 Goal 5 - Obj. 1 (MontereyShaleBeds_SMP) Edward F. Ricketts State 1.14 1.3 New MPA Existing lease for hand-cut kelp Goal 3 - Obj. 1, 3, 4 Marine Conservation Area would be grandfathered in from Goal 5 - Obj. 1 the Chart House to the east Design Considerations: 7 (EdRicketts_SMCA) edge of Hopkins SMR. Hopkins State Marine 0.15 0.4 Existing MPA No take Goal 1 - Obj. 3, 4, 5 Reserve Goal 2 - Obj. 1 Goal 3 - Obj. 2 (Hopkins_SMR) 2 MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force November 29-30, 2005 Meeting Summary of MPAs within Candidate MPA Package A Modification Regional Goals, to Existing MPA Name (concept file Area Alongshore Objectives, and Design Central Allowed/ Disallowed Uses name) (sq. mi.) span (mi) Criteria toward which this Coast MPA MPA contributes or new MPA? Pacific Grove State Marine 1.74 2.9 Modification of Allowed: commercial fishing for Goal 3 - Obj. 1 Conservation Area existing MPA squid, sardines, herring, Goal 4 - Obj. 2 anchovy, mackerel and kelp. Goal 5 - Obj. 1 (PacificGrove_SMCA) Recreational fishing for finfish only. No intertidal harvest. Cypress Pinnacles State 0.99 1.1 New MPA No Take Goal 1 - Obj. 1, 2 Marine Reserve Goal 2 - Obj. 1, 2 Goal 4 - Obj. 1 (CypressPinnacles_SMR) Carmel Bay State Marine 1.93 3.1 Modification of Allowed: All recreational fishing Goal 3 - Obj. 1,2,3 Park existing MPA except crustaceans and Goal 4 - Obj. 1,2 mollusks Goal 4 - Obj. 1,2 (CarmelBay_SMP) Goal 5 - Obj. 1 Design Considerations: 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Point Lobos State Marine 5.47 6.6 Modification of No Take Goal 1 - Obj. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Reserve existing MPA Goal 2 - Obj. 2 Goal 3 - Obj. 1, 2, 3, 4 (PointLobos_SMR) Goal 4 - Obj. 1, 2 Goal 5 - Obj. 1 ,3 Goal 6 Point Lobos SMCA 12.21 4.0 Allowed: salmon trolling and Goal 1 - Obj. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 commercial spot prawn Goal 2 - Obj. 2 (PointLobos_SMCA) trapping only Goal 3 - Obj. 1, 2 Goal 4 - Obj. 1, 2 Goal 5 - Obj. 1, 3 Goal 6 3 MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force November 29-30, 2005 Meeting Summary of MPAs within Candidate MPA Package A Modification Regional Goals, to Existing MPA Name (concept file Area Alongshore Objectives, and Design Central Allowed/ Disallowed Uses name) (sq. mi.) span (mi) Criteria toward which this Coast MPA MPA contributes or new MPA? Big Sur State Marine 53.80 14.6 Modification of No take Goal 1 - Obj. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Reserve existing MPA Goal 2 Goal 4 (BigSur_SMR) Goal 5 - Obj. 2 Goal 6 Design Considerations: 3, 4, 7, 9 Big Creek State Marine 1.57 2.5 Existing MPA No Take Goal 3 - Obj. 2 Reserve (BigCreek_SMR) Big Creek SMCA 6.91 2.5 New MPA Allowed: recreational and Goal 1 commercial salmon trolling and Goal 4 (Big Creek_SMCA) commercial spot prawn Goal 5 trapping. Design Considerations: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 Piedras Blancas State 12.97 5.8 New MPA No take Goal 1 Marine Reserve Goal 2 - Obj. 1, 2 Goal 4 - Obj. 2 (PiedrasBlancas_SMR) Goal 5 - Obj. 2 Goal 6 Cambria State Marine Park 9.26 5.7 New MPA Allowed: All recreational fishing Goal 3 - Obj. 1, 2, 3 Goal 5 - Obj. 1, 3 (Cambria_SMP) 4 MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force November 29-30, 2005 Meeting Summary of MPAs within Candidate MPA Package A Modification Regional Goals, to Existing MPA Name (concept file Area Alongshore Objectives, and Design Central Allowed/ Disallowed Uses name) (sq. mi.) span (mi) Criteria toward which this Coast MPA MPA contributes or new MPA? Cambria State Marine 3.39 2.3 New MPA No take Goal 1 - Obj. 1, 3, 4, 5 Reserve Goal 2 - Obj. 2 Goal 3 - Obj. 1, 2, 4 (Cambria_SMR) Goal 4- Obj. 2 Goal 5 - Obj. 1, 3 Goal 6 Design Considerations: 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 Morro Bay State Marine 0.81 3.8 New MPA No take Goal 3 - Obj.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Massachusetts Marine Artificial Reef Plan
    Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Fisheries Policy Report FP – 3 Massachusetts Marine Artificial Reef Plan M. A. Rousseau Massachusetts Division of MarineFisheries Department of Fish and Game Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Commonwealth of Massachusetts June 2008 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Fisheries Policy Report FP - 3 Massachusetts Marine Artificial Reef Plan Mark Rousseau Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries 251 Causeway Street, Suite 400 Boston, MA 02114 June 2008 Massachusetts Division of MarineFisheries Paul J. Diodati - Director Department of Fish and Game Mary B. Griffin - Commissioner Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Ian A. Bowles - Secretary Commonwealth of Massachusetts Deval L. Patrick – Governor Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................iv I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE OF MA ARTIFICIAL REEF PLAN ............................................................................................................2 1.2 DEFINITION OF AN ARTIFICIAL REEF....................................................................................................................2 1.3 BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTIVITY AND AGGREGATION................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Outer Boundaries of South Australia's Marine Parks Networks
    1 For further information, please contact: Coast and Marine Conservation Branch Department for Environment and Heritage GPO Box 1047 Adelaide SA 5001 Telephone: (08) 8124 4900 Facsimile: (08) 8214 4920 Cite as: Department for Environment and Heritage (2009). A technical report on the outer boundaries of South Australia’s marine parks network. Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia. Mapping information: All maps created by the Department for Environment and Heritage unless otherwise stated. © Copyright Department for Environment and Heritage 2009. All rights reserved. All works and information displayed are subject to copyright. For the reproduction or publication beyond that permitted by the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth) written permission must be sought from the Department. Although every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information displayed, the Department, its agents, officers and employees make no representations, either express or implied, that the information is accurate or fit for any purpose and expressly disclaims all liability for loss or damage arising from reliance upon the information displayed. ©Department for Environment and Heritage, 2009 ISBN No. 1 921238 36 4. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Preface.......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 South Australia’s marine parks network...............................................................................8 2 Introduction..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens & Reef Science
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Report Editor: Jennifer Loder Report Authors and Contributors: Jennifer Loder, Terry Done, Alex Lea, Annie Bauer, Jodi Salmond, Jos Hill, Lionel Galway, Eva Kovacs, Jo Roberts, Melissa Walker, Shannon Mooney, Alena Pribyl, Marie-Lise Schläppy Science Advisory Team: Dr. Terry Done, Dr. Chris Roelfsema, Dr. Gregor Hodgson, Dr. Marie-Lise Schläppy, Jos Hill Graphic Designers: Manu Taboada, Tyler Hood, Alex Levonis This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence visit: http:// This project is supported by Reef Check creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Australia, through funding from the Australian Government. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Reef Check Foundation Ltd, PO Box 13204 George St Brisbane QLD 4003, Project achievements have been made [email protected] possible by a countless number of dedicated volunteers, collaborators, funders, advisors and industry champions. Citation: Thanks from us and our oceans. Volunteers, Staff and Supporters of Reef Check Australia (2015). Authors J. Loder, T. Done, A. Lea, A. Bauer, J. Salmond, J. Hill, L. Galway, E. Kovacs, J. Roberts, M. Walker, S. Mooney, A. Pribyl, M.L. Schläppy. Citizens & Reef Science: A Celebration of Reef Check Australia’s volunteer reef monitoring, education and conservation programs 2001- 2014. Reef Check Foundation Ltd. Cover photo credit: Undersea Explorer, GBR Photo by Matt Curnock (Russell Island, GBR) 3 Key messages FROM REEF CHECK AUSTRALIA 2001-2014 WELCOME AND THANKS • Reef monitoring is critical to understand • Across most RCA sites there was both human and natural impacts, as well evidence of reef health impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Sea Dive Ebook Free Download
    DEEP SEA DIVE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Frank Lampard | 112 pages | 07 Apr 2016 | Hachette Children's Group | 9780349132136 | English | London, United Kingdom Deep Sea Dive PDF Book Zombie Worm. Marrus orthocanna. Deep diving can mean something else in the commercial diving field. They can be found all over the world. Depth at which breathing compressed air exposes the diver to an oxygen partial pressure of 1. Retrieved 31 May Diving medicine. Arthur J. Retrieved 13 March Although commercial and military divers often operate at those depths, or even deeper, they are surface supplied. Minimal visibility is still possible far deeper. The temperature is rising in the ocean and we still don't know what kind of an impact that will have on the many species that exist in the ocean. Guiel Jr. His dive was aborted due to equipment failure. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC. Depth limit for a group of 2 to 3 French Level 3 recreational divers, breathing air. Underwater diving to a depth beyond the norm accepted by the associated community. Limpet mine Speargun Hawaiian sling Polespear. Michele Geraci [42]. Diving safety. Retrieved 19 September All of these considerations result in the amount of breathing gas required for deep diving being much greater than for shallow open water diving. King Crab. Atrial septal defect Effects of drugs on fitness to dive Fitness to dive Psychological fitness to dive. The bottom part which has the pilot sphere inside. List of diving environments by type Altitude diving Benign water diving Confined water diving Deep diving Inland diving Inshore diving Muck diving Night diving Open-water diving Black-water diving Blue-water diving Penetration diving Cave diving Ice diving Wreck diving Recreational dive sites Underwater environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruise Programme
    R1/3 Not to be cited without prior reference to the FRS Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen Charter Cruises Seol Mara – Charter Cruise 1807H Farsain - Charter Cruise 1707H Urchin - Charter Cruise 1607H Diving and ROV surveys to assess the benthic impact of scallop dredging in the Firth of Lorn Reports Dates 6- 11 May 2007. Vessels Seol Mara – 0830 Mon 7/5/07 to 1400 Fri 11/5/07 (ROV Support Vessel) Farsain - 0830 Mon 7/5/07 to 2000 Mon 7/5/07 (Diving Support Vessel) Urchin - 0830 Tues 8/5/07 to 1400 Fri 11/5/07 (Diving Support Vessel) Project Codes: MF02q (10460) Personnel Sue Marrs (SNH) (Survey Coordinator) David Donnan (SNH) (In charge of ROV Operations) Mike Breen (In charge of Diving Operations) Trevor Howell Keith Summerbell Melanie Harding Martin Burns Laura Baxter (SNH Diver) Jane Dodd (SNH Diver) Objectives To conduct a video survey to assess for the benthic impact of scallop dredging along pre-defined transects, using both ROV and diver operated systems. ROV Operations ROV Support Vessel: RV Seol Mara Personnel: David Donnan (SNH), Sue Marrs (SNH); Martin Burns (FRS); Lesley Kennedy (SAMS) (visitor 8 & 9 May). Equipment: VideoRay ROV (GTO model with upgraded boosters for operating in currents). Umbilical: two 75m lengths of neutral buoyancy cable, and one 40m length of sinking cable. Footage recorded onto Mini digital cassettes, using Sony GV900 video walkman VCR. Generator (240v AC, 3KW) and Drop Frame Camera. Narrative 7 May ROV loaded and set up. ROV deployed with 2 x 75m lengths of neutral buoyancy cable. Interference experienced when approximately 100m was coiled off the cable drum (this problem was consistent throughout the trip when these two cables were used).
    [Show full text]
  • And Seascape Determinants of Recreational Diving: Evidence for Portugal’S South Coast
    Marine Policy 123 (2021) 104285 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Policy journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol Full length article Assessing the land- and seascape determinants of recreational diving: Evidence for Portugal’s south coast Mariana Cardoso-Andrade a,b,*, Frederico Cruz-Jesus c, Francisco Castro Rego d, Mafalda Rangel b, Henrique Queiroga a a Departamento de Biologia and CESAM Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitario´ de Santiago, Aveiro 3810-193, Portugal b CCMAR - Centro de Ci^encias do Mar do Algarve, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, Faro 8005-139, Portugal c NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus de Campolide, Lisboa 1070-312, Portugal d Centro de Ecologia Aplicada “Professor Baeta Neves” (CEABN), InBIO, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, Lisboa 1349-017, Portugal ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Scuba diving is one of the most popular coastal recreational activities, and one of the few that are allowed in SCUBA diving multiple-use marine protected areas. Nevertheless, like many other coastal activities, if in excess, it may harm Marine coastal management coastal ecosystems and their sustainable use. This paper focuses on the seascape and landscape characteristics Marine spatial planning that are most associated with the existence of dive sites, aiming to identify other suitable locations along the Marine conservation coast to potentially reduce environmental pressure (e.g., overcrowding and physical damage) on the existing dive Coastal zone sites. Logistic regressions were employed to model the suitability for dive sites existence in the Portuguese south coast (Algarve), one of the most popular Summer destinations in mainland Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy SURTASS LFA Sonar Activities 2019
    Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy SURTASS LFA Sonar Activities Consultation No. OPR-2019-00120 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Consultation History ........................................................................................................ 3 2 The Assessment Framework ................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Evidence Available for the Consultation ......................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Approach to Assessing Effects to Marine Mammals ................................................ 9 2.1.2 Approach to Assessing Effects to Sea Turtles ........................................................ 24 3 Description of the Proposed Action ................................................................................... 25 3.1 The Navy’s Proposed Action ......................................................................................... 26 3.2 Description of the Surveillance Towed Array Sensor System (SURTASS) Low Frequency Active (LFA) Sonar System ................................................................................... 28 3.2.1 Passive Sonar System Components ........................................................................ 29 3.2.2 Active
    [Show full text]
  • Diving Safety Partners
    Your basic guide to DAN-SA Diving Safety Partners THE DAN-SA DIVING SAFETY PARTNER (DPS) PROGRAMME RECOGNISES THOSE WITHIN THE DIVING INDUSTRY WHO HAVE MADE A COMMITMENT TO PROMOTE DIVING SAFETY BY ACHIEVING A HIGH DEGREE OF EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FOR THE DIRECT BENEFIT TO TRAVELLING DIVERS THE WORLD OVER. THESE RESORTS, LIVE-ABOARDS AND CHARTER SERVICES SHOULD BE APPLAUDED FOR THEIR EFFORTS ON BEHALF OF THE DIVING PUBLIC AND THIS QUICK AND EASY GUIDE WILL SHOW HOW PARTICIPATING RECREATIONAL SCUBA DIVE RESORTS, CHARTER BOATS AND LIVE-ABOARD VESSEL OPERATORS CAN BECOME DAN-SA DSPS. DEFINITION Why DAN-SA (A business that regularly engages in and TYPE OF BUSINESS promotes itself as providing the following services Diving Safety Partners? to recreational divers) The DSP programme consists of three levels, with an associated Hazard Recreational dive resort Accommodations and other hospitality services Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) component. proximate to recreational dive sites Recreational dive charter On-water transportation to and from dive sites via The programme is designed for professionals in the recreational diving boat operation a licensed, commercial vessel(s), including a hired industry who work hard to be safe and responsible dive operators. From crew as part of its regular service the very beginning, DAN has included within its mission “to work to prevent Recreational dive live- On-water transportation to and from dive sites diving injuries and to promote diving safety”. However, DAN cannot achieve aboard vessel operation via a licensed, commercial vessel(s) designed for this objective single-handedly and it requires a partnership with the overnight accommodations, including a hired crew professionals in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Recreational Diving in Temporary Closures Following the 2010 Coral Bleaching Event in the Andaman Sea
    Managing recreational diving in temporary closures following the 2010 coral bleaching event in the Andaman Sea S. Pengsakun, T. Yeemin, W. Klinthong, K. Sangmanee, M. Sutthacheep, S. Hamanee, B. Lawang Abstract The severe coral bleaching event in 2010 led to coral mortality in many dive sites of Thailand. This study focused on management strategies for degraded recreational dive sites following the 2010 coral bleaching event in a marine national park in the Andaman Sea. Popular dive sites in marine national parks such as East of Eden and Ao Faiwab in Mu Ko Similan National Park have been temporarily closed since 2010 in order to build resilience and to enhance coral recovery. The long-term coral reef monitoring program showed that live coral covers at both dive sites increased slightly over the last five years. Coral recruitment rates were also relatively low. As numbers of recreational divers in the Andaman Sea are increasing, the Mu Ko Similan National Park management are considering establishing new dive sites in the park. However we recommend that active coral restoration in small controlled areas for recreational diving should be carried out instead of creating new dive sites. Raising public awareness is also urgently required intensely for coral reef conservation in Thailand in the period of increasing human and climate change impacts. Keywords: coral bleaching, tourism, management, marine protected area, Andaman Sea S Pengsakun, T Yeemin W Klinthong K Sangmanee M Sutthacheep B Lawang Marine Biodiversity Research Group, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ramkhamhaeng University, Bangkok 10240, Thailand S Hamanee School of Business Administration, Sripatum University Phaholyothin Road, Jatujak, Bangkok 10900 Thailand Communicating author: S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fa Aga Aloa Coa B Asta Ook Al Us K Ses Map P
    Fagaloa Coastal Uses Map Book American Samoa 2012 NOAA, ASDOC, DMWR, ASEPA Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………. 1 Spearfishing…………………………………………………………………………………… 2 Handlining/ Bamboo pole/ rod and reel fishing from shore……………………………. 3 Trolling………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Bottom Fishing……………………………………………………………………………… 5 Throw Nets………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 Shoreline and Nearshore Gleaning and Gathering...………………………………….. 7 Palolo……………………………………………………...………………………………… 8 Recreational Paddling……………………………………………………………………… 9 Recreational Sailing…………………………………………………………………………10 Jet Skis………………………………………………………………………………………. 11 Surfing……………………………………………………………………………………….. 12 Shoreline Recreation……………………………………………………………………….. 13 Swimming……………………………………………………………………………………. 14 Recreational Snorkeling……………………………………………………………………. 15 Recreational Diving…………………………………………………………………………. 16 Research & Education Activities……………………………………………………………17 Introduction This map book contains cartographic products derived from the American Samoa Coastal Use Mapping project conducted in Pago Pago, American Samoa in July 2012. Data was obtained through a participatory GIS workshop designed to gather spatial data on human uses of the coastal and nearshore marine environment in the greater Pago Pago Harbor region known as Fagaloa. The project was intended to fill a critical information gap regarding the spatial distribution of human activities in the American Samoa Coral Reef Strategy priority site in order to better inform planning and management
    [Show full text]
  • Ongoing Removals of Invasive Lionfish in Honduras and Their Effect On
    Ongoing removals of invasive lionfish in Honduras and their effect on native Caribbean prey fishes Friederike Peiffer1, Sonia Bejarano2, Giacomo Palavicini de Witte3,4 and Christian Wild1 1 Coral Reef Ecology Group, Marine Ecology Department, Faculty of Biology and Chemistry, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany 2 Department of Ecology, Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT), Bremen, Germany 3 Roatan Marine Park, Roatan, Islas De La Bahia, Honduras 4 Current affiliation: Shark Legacy Project, Roatan, Islas De La Bahia, Honduras ABSTRACT The invasion of Indo-Pacific lionfish is one of the most pressing concerns in the context of coral reef conservation throughout the Caribbean. Invasive lionfish threaten Caribbean fish communities by feeding on a wide range of native prey species, some of which have high ecological and economic value. In Roatan (Honduras) a local non-governmental organisation (i.e. Roatan Marine Park) trains residents and tourists in the use of spears to remove invasive lionfish. Here, we assess the effectiveness of local removal efforts in reducing lionfish populations. We ask whether reefs subject to relatively frequent removals support more diverse and abundant native fish assemblages compared to sites were no removals take place. Lionfish biomass, as well as density and diversity of native prey species were quantified on reefs subject to regular and no removal efforts. Reefs subject to regular - lionfish removals (two to three removals month 1) with a mean catch per unit effort - - of 2.76 ± 1.72 lionfish fisher 1 h 1 had 95% lower lionfish biomass compared to non- removal sites. Sites subject to lionfish removals supported 30% higher densities of native prey-sized fishes compared to sites subject to no removal efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Science in the Case of a “Problematic” Taxon
    Biogeographia – The Journal of Integrative Biogeography 36 (2021): s005 SPECIAL SECTION: Citizen Science in Biogeography https://doi.org/10.21426/B636053543 People’s contribution to the knowledge of Pycnogonida: citizen science in the case of a “problematic” taxon ELISA COLASANTO1, LORIS GALLI1* 1 Department of Earth, Environmental and Life Sciences (DISTAV), Genoa University, Corso Europa 26, 16132 Genoa (Italy) * corresponding author, email: [email protected] Keywords: Geographic distribution, Observations, Pantopoda, Scuba diving, Websites. SUMMARY Pycnogonida is a poorly known class of marine arthropods represented by nearly 1350 species described worldwide. We examined data about these organisms available on seven websites for photographs and information sharing among recreational naturalists. We found 384 observations, mainly with data about locality and date. Photos about 65 of them resulted correctly identified to the species level with certainty. The others refer to species whose identification requires a more in-depth analysis under a microscope. Unfortunately, this problem is common to a high percentage of pycnogonids. Therefore it seems unlikely that citizen scientists could contribute significantly to their knowledge. Nevertheless, for some species this would be possible and data on the presence of the taxon could be useful for more general studies at community level. INTRODUCTION specimens, sexual dimorphism, a strong Pycnogonida is a poorly known class of marine intraspecific variability in some species and the arthropods represented by nearly 1350 species need to carefully examine several diagnostic described worldwide (Bamber et al., 2021). Due characters that sometimes differ among genera to their morphology, pycnogonids are (see Arango, 2002; Arango & Wheeler, 2007). commonly named “sea spiders”.
    [Show full text]