DOCSLIB.ORG

Marine Protected Areas in Alaska: Recommendations for a Public Process

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marine Protected Areas in Alaska: Recommendations for a Public Process Marine Protected Areas in Alaska: Recommendations for a Public Process REPORT TO THE ALASKA BOARD OF FISHERIES By The Alaska Department of Fish and Game Marine Protected Areas Task Force Doug Woodby (chair), Scott Meyer, Kristin Mabry, Victoria O’Connell, Charlie Trowbridge, Janet Hall Schempf, Earl Krygier, and Denby Lloyd Regional Information Report 5J02-08 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Commercial Fisheries Juneau, Alaska July 2002 1 Marine Protected Areas in Alaska: Recommendations for a Public Process REPORT TO THE ALASKA BOARD OF FISHERIES By The Alaska Department of Fish and Game Marine Protected Areas Task Force Doug Woodby (chair), Scott Meyer, Kristin Mabry, Victoria O’Connell, Charlie Trowbridge, Janet Hall Schempf, Earl Krygier, and Denby Lloyd Regional Information Report1 5J02-08 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Commercial Fisheries Juneau, Alaska July 2002 1 The Regional Information Report Series was established in 1987 to provide an information access system for all unpublished divisional reports. These reports frequently serve diverse ad hoc informational purposes or archive basic uninterpreted data. To accommodate timely reporting of recently collected information, reports in this series undergo only limited internal review and may contain preliminary data, this information my be subsequently finalized and published in the formal literature. Consequently, these reports should not be cited without prior approval of the author or the Division of Commercial Fisheries. AUTHORS Doug Woodby is the Shellfish Fisheries Scientist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, 1255 W. 8th Street, Juneau, Alaska 99801. Scott Meyer is the Southcentral Region Groundfish Management and Research Biologist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish, 3298 Douglas Place, Homer, Alaska 99603-8027. Kristin Mabry is a GIS Biometrician for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, 1255 W. 8th Street, Juneau, Alaska 99801. Victoria O’Connell is the Southeast Region Groundfish Project Leader for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, 304 Lake Street, Room 103, Sitka, Alaska 99835-7563. Charlie Trowbridge is the Central Region Groundfish and Shellfish Fisheries Management Biologist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, 3298 Douglas Place, Homer, Alaska 99603-8027. Janet Hall Schempf is the Coastal Management Coordinator for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, and the staff biologist for the Division of Habitat and Restoration, ADF&G, 1255 W. 8th Street, Juneau, Alaska 99801. Earl Krygier is the Extended Jurisdiction Program Manager for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, 333 Raspberry Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99518-1599. Denby Lloyd is the Westward Regional Supervisor for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, 211 Mission Road, Kodiak, Alaska 99615- 6399. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank Doug Mecum, Wayne Regelin, Kelly Hepler, Chip Dennerlein, Rob Bentz, Rob Bosworth, and Frank Rue for their constructive comments on drafts of this document. The authors also wish to thank Paul DeSloover for procuring scientific literature and Amy Carroll for publication assistance. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES......................................................................................................................................III TABLE OF FIGURES................................................................................................................................III INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 YOUR FEEDBACK IS REQUESTED ................................................................................................................. 2 RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................................................. 4 DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................................ 4 GOALS OF MARINE RESERVES IN ALASKA................................................................................................... 4 GOAL FOR PROTECTION OF MARINE HABITATS............................................................................................. 5 SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MARINE RESERVES AND PROTECTED MARINE HABITATS IN ALASKAN WATERS ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Policy ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Public Involvement Process.................................................................................................................... 5 Evaluate Needs for Reserves and Habitat Protection............................................................................. 6 Reserve Site Selection ............................................................................................................................. 7 Buffer Zones............................................................................................................................................ 7 Experimental Controls............................................................................................................................ 8 Sensitive Marine Habitats....................................................................................................................... 8 Coordination with Federal Efforts and with other State Agencies ......................................................... 8 Management Plans for Reserves............................................................................................................. 9 Monitoring and Evaluation..................................................................................................................... 9 APPENDIX A: ALASKA BOARD OF FISHERIES CHARGE TO COMMITTEE ........................... 10 APPENDIX B: THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR RESERVES ............................................................... 12 BENEFITS AND COSTS TO FISH, FISHERIES, AND ECOSYSTEMS.................................................................. 12 Benefits Within Reserves....................................................................................................................... 12 Benefits Outside of Reserves................................................................................................................. 14 Costs ..................................................................................................................................................... 20 Example: Glacier Bay........................................................................................................................... 20 RESERVE DESIGN....................................................................................................................................... 23 Location ................................................................................................................................................ 23 RESERVE SIZE............................................................................................................................................ 25 Configuration: Reserve Networks......................................................................................................... 26 Coverage............................................................................................................................................... 28 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................. 28 APPENDIX C: MPA PROCESSES IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS...................................................... 30 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 30 U.S. FEDERAL MARINE PROTECTED AREA PROGRAMS ............................................................................. 31 Current status, Definition, and Legislation........................................................................................... 31 Legal Basis............................................................................................................................................ 32 Process.................................................................................................................................................. 33 History .................................................................................................................................................. 35 Inventory of Current MPAs................................................................................................................... 35 Case Studies.......................................................................................................................................... 35 Contacts for the federal MPA Inventory ............................................................................................... 36 Internet Sites ........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Massachusetts Marine Artificial Reef Plan
    Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Fisheries Policy Report FP – 3 Massachusetts Marine Artificial Reef Plan M. A. Rousseau Massachusetts Division of MarineFisheries Department of Fish and Game Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Commonwealth of Massachusetts June 2008 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Fisheries Policy Report FP - 3 Massachusetts Marine Artificial Reef Plan Mark Rousseau Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries 251 Causeway Street, Suite 400 Boston, MA 02114 June 2008 Massachusetts Division of MarineFisheries Paul J. Diodati - Director Department of Fish and Game Mary B. Griffin - Commissioner Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Ian A. Bowles - Secretary Commonwealth of Massachusetts Deval L. Patrick – Governor Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................iv I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE OF MA ARTIFICIAL REEF PLAN ............................................................................................................2 1.2 DEFINITION OF AN ARTIFICIAL REEF....................................................................................................................2 1.3 BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTIVITY AND AGGREGATION................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Outer Boundaries of South Australia's Marine Parks Networks
    1 For further information, please contact: Coast and Marine Conservation Branch Department for Environment and Heritage GPO Box 1047 Adelaide SA 5001 Telephone: (08) 8124 4900 Facsimile: (08) 8214 4920 Cite as: Department for Environment and Heritage (2009). A technical report on the outer boundaries of South Australia’s marine parks network. Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia. Mapping information: All maps created by the Department for Environment and Heritage unless otherwise stated. © Copyright Department for Environment and Heritage 2009. All rights reserved. All works and information displayed are subject to copyright. For the reproduction or publication beyond that permitted by the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth) written permission must be sought from the Department. Although every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information displayed, the Department, its agents, officers and employees make no representations, either express or implied, that the information is accurate or fit for any purpose and expressly disclaims all liability for loss or damage arising from reliance upon the information displayed. ©Department for Environment and Heritage, 2009 ISBN No. 1 921238 36 4. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Preface.......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 South Australia’s marine parks network...............................................................................8 2 Introduction..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eyes Over Puget Sound
    Publication No. 21-03-070 Eyes Over Puget Sound Summary Stay connected COVID Stories Critters & Divers Climate and streams Aerial photos Info Picture by: Jesse Miller 2020 in Review Up-to-date observations of visible water quality conditions in Puget Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca Summary conditions at a glance Summary Stay connected COVID Stories Critters & Divers Climate and streams Aerial photos Info The COVID pandemic of 2020 resulted in an information UNIT COVID gap in our work between March and September. Our field Stories crew slowly has restored full capacity and data collection, and EOPS photography resumed in September. Critters Critters in the sediment and water are a testament that and life continues in beautiful ways, and it’s worth going for Divers a dive in Puget Sound when the water is clear. Climate Despite wildfires and a lot of smoke during a dry late and summer, precipitation and flows of major rivers were as Streams expected, or even above normal, for most of the year. MARINE MONITORING MONITORING MARINE With volunteers sending in images on the water we can say that 2020 was a productive year for Puget Sound. TERM Aerial - photos Schools of herring were abundant, Noctiluca blooms were big and numerous, and large amounts of decaying organic material washed onto beaches. LONG Picture by: Jessica Alexanderson Editor: Dr. Christopher Krembs, editorial assistance: Valerie Partridge. PSEMP Marine Waters Workgroup Report of 2018 Summary Stay connected COVID Stories Critters & Divers Climate and streams Aerial photos Info Follow-up on the conditions that led up to 2019, in Puget Sound’s comprehensive marine waters report.
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Photography Made Easy
    Underwater Photography Made Easy Create amazing photos & video with by Annie Crawley IncludingIncluding highhigh definitiondefinition videovideo andand photophoto galleriesgalleries toto showshow youyou positioningpositioning andand bestbest techniques!techniques! BY ANNIE CRAWLEY SeaLife Cameras Perfect for every environment whether you are headed on a tropical vacation or diving the Puget Sound. These cameras meet all of your imaging needs! ©2013 Annie Crawley www.Sealife-cameras.com www.DiveIntoYourImagination.com Edmonds Underwater Park, Washington All rights reserved. This interactive book, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher, Dive Into Your Imagination, LLC a company founded by Annie Crawley committed to change the way a new generation views the Ocean and themselves. Dive Into Your Imagination, Reg. Pat. & Tm. Off. Underwater Photography Made Easy shows you how to take great photos and video with your SeaLife camera system. After our introduction to this interactive book you will learn: 1. Easy to apply tips and tricks to help you create great images. 2. Five quick review steps to make sure your SeaLife camera system is ready before every dive. 3. Neutral buoyancy tips to help you take great underwater photos & video with your SeaLife camera system. 4. Macro and wide angle photography and video basics including color, composition, understanding the rule of thirds, leading diagonals, foreground and background considerations, plus lighting with strobes and video lights. 5. Techniques for both temperate and tropical waters, how to photograph divers, fish behavior and interaction shots, the difference in capturing animal portraits versus recording action in video. You will learn how to capture sharks, turtles, dolphins, clownfish, plus so much more.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens & Reef Science
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Report Editor: Jennifer Loder Report Authors and Contributors: Jennifer Loder, Terry Done, Alex Lea, Annie Bauer, Jodi Salmond, Jos Hill, Lionel Galway, Eva Kovacs, Jo Roberts, Melissa Walker, Shannon Mooney, Alena Pribyl, Marie-Lise Schläppy Science Advisory Team: Dr. Terry Done, Dr. Chris Roelfsema, Dr. Gregor Hodgson, Dr. Marie-Lise Schläppy, Jos Hill Graphic Designers: Manu Taboada, Tyler Hood, Alex Levonis This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence visit: http:// This project is supported by Reef Check creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Australia, through funding from the Australian Government. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Reef Check Foundation Ltd, PO Box 13204 George St Brisbane QLD 4003, Project achievements have been made [email protected] possible by a countless number of dedicated volunteers, collaborators, funders, advisors and industry champions. Citation: Thanks from us and our oceans. Volunteers, Staff and Supporters of Reef Check Australia (2015). Authors J. Loder, T. Done, A. Lea, A. Bauer, J. Salmond, J. Hill, L. Galway, E. Kovacs, J. Roberts, M. Walker, S. Mooney, A. Pribyl, M.L. Schläppy. Citizens & Reef Science: A Celebration of Reef Check Australia’s volunteer reef monitoring, education and conservation programs 2001- 2014. Reef Check Foundation Ltd. Cover photo credit: Undersea Explorer, GBR Photo by Matt Curnock (Russell Island, GBR) 3 Key messages FROM REEF CHECK AUSTRALIA 2001-2014 WELCOME AND THANKS • Reef monitoring is critical to understand • Across most RCA sites there was both human and natural impacts, as well evidence of reef health impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Workshop Summary Report Salish Sea Fish Assemblage Workshop September 18th 2018 Seattle, Washington Prepared by Zoe van Duivenbode Introduction Changes in the composition and abundance of fish assemblages within the Salish Sea region have long been a topic of interest for management, as they can result in a variety of possible consequences associated with species/population management, habitat conservation, and ecological shifts. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), and SeaDoc Society organized a workshop to gather managers, researchers, and policy-makers involved in Salish Sea fish assemblages to share and discuss evidence of fish community change, impacts of change on species and ecosystem recovery, and to align management priorities and identify research needs. Further, the idea for a workshop originally was identified within the Endangered Species Act Recovery Plan for yelloweye rockfish and bocaccio of the Puget Sound/Georgia Basin (NMFS 2017)1. It became clear that assessing rockfish assemblage change without the context of assessing available information on full fish assemblage change would be insufficient for addressing recovery needs. The goal of the workshop was to identify relevant time-series data, evaluate current research, and discuss how existing efforts may contribute to future management strategies. In addition to the host agencies, workshop participants represented a collection of agencies and organizations including the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Puget Sound Restoration Fund, Seattle Aquarium, Samish Tribe’s Department of Natural Resources, Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, Washington Department of Ecology, WDFW, University of Washington and more (see appendix for full list of participants and organizations).
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Sea Dive Ebook Free Download
    DEEP SEA DIVE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Frank Lampard | 112 pages | 07 Apr 2016 | Hachette Children's Group | 9780349132136 | English | London, United Kingdom Deep Sea Dive PDF Book Zombie Worm. Marrus orthocanna. Deep diving can mean something else in the commercial diving field. They can be found all over the world. Depth at which breathing compressed air exposes the diver to an oxygen partial pressure of 1. Retrieved 31 May Diving medicine. Arthur J. Retrieved 13 March Although commercial and military divers often operate at those depths, or even deeper, they are surface supplied. Minimal visibility is still possible far deeper. The temperature is rising in the ocean and we still don't know what kind of an impact that will have on the many species that exist in the ocean. Guiel Jr. His dive was aborted due to equipment failure. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC. Depth limit for a group of 2 to 3 French Level 3 recreational divers, breathing air. Underwater diving to a depth beyond the norm accepted by the associated community. Limpet mine Speargun Hawaiian sling Polespear. Michele Geraci [42]. Diving safety. Retrieved 19 September All of these considerations result in the amount of breathing gas required for deep diving being much greater than for shallow open water diving. King Crab. Atrial septal defect Effects of drugs on fitness to dive Fitness to dive Psychological fitness to dive. The bottom part which has the pilot sphere inside. List of diving environments by type Altitude diving Benign water diving Confined water diving Deep diving Inland diving Inshore diving Muck diving Night diving Open-water diving Black-water diving Blue-water diving Penetration diving Cave diving Ice diving Wreck diving Recreational dive sites Underwater environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruise Programme
    R1/3 Not to be cited without prior reference to the FRS Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen Charter Cruises Seol Mara – Charter Cruise 1807H Farsain - Charter Cruise 1707H Urchin - Charter Cruise 1607H Diving and ROV surveys to assess the benthic impact of scallop dredging in the Firth of Lorn Reports Dates 6- 11 May 2007. Vessels Seol Mara – 0830 Mon 7/5/07 to 1400 Fri 11/5/07 (ROV Support Vessel) Farsain - 0830 Mon 7/5/07 to 2000 Mon 7/5/07 (Diving Support Vessel) Urchin - 0830 Tues 8/5/07 to 1400 Fri 11/5/07 (Diving Support Vessel) Project Codes: MF02q (10460) Personnel Sue Marrs (SNH) (Survey Coordinator) David Donnan (SNH) (In charge of ROV Operations) Mike Breen (In charge of Diving Operations) Trevor Howell Keith Summerbell Melanie Harding Martin Burns Laura Baxter (SNH Diver) Jane Dodd (SNH Diver) Objectives To conduct a video survey to assess for the benthic impact of scallop dredging along pre-defined transects, using both ROV and diver operated systems. ROV Operations ROV Support Vessel: RV Seol Mara Personnel: David Donnan (SNH), Sue Marrs (SNH); Martin Burns (FRS); Lesley Kennedy (SAMS) (visitor 8 & 9 May). Equipment: VideoRay ROV (GTO model with upgraded boosters for operating in currents). Umbilical: two 75m lengths of neutral buoyancy cable, and one 40m length of sinking cable. Footage recorded onto Mini digital cassettes, using Sony GV900 video walkman VCR. Generator (240v AC, 3KW) and Drop Frame Camera. Narrative 7 May ROV loaded and set up. ROV deployed with 2 x 75m lengths of neutral buoyancy cable. Interference experienced when approximately 100m was coiled off the cable drum (this problem was consistent throughout the trip when these two cables were used).
    [Show full text]
  • And Seascape Determinants of Recreational Diving: Evidence for Portugal’S South Coast
    Marine Policy 123 (2021) 104285 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Policy journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol Full length article Assessing the land- and seascape determinants of recreational diving: Evidence for Portugal’s south coast Mariana Cardoso-Andrade a,b,*, Frederico Cruz-Jesus c, Francisco Castro Rego d, Mafalda Rangel b, Henrique Queiroga a a Departamento de Biologia and CESAM Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitario´ de Santiago, Aveiro 3810-193, Portugal b CCMAR - Centro de Ci^encias do Mar do Algarve, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, Faro 8005-139, Portugal c NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus de Campolide, Lisboa 1070-312, Portugal d Centro de Ecologia Aplicada “Professor Baeta Neves” (CEABN), InBIO, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, Lisboa 1349-017, Portugal ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Scuba diving is one of the most popular coastal recreational activities, and one of the few that are allowed in SCUBA diving multiple-use marine protected areas. Nevertheless, like many other coastal activities, if in excess, it may harm Marine coastal management coastal ecosystems and their sustainable use. This paper focuses on the seascape and landscape characteristics Marine spatial planning that are most associated with the existence of dive sites, aiming to identify other suitable locations along the Marine conservation coast to potentially reduce environmental pressure (e.g., overcrowding and physical damage) on the existing dive Coastal zone sites. Logistic regressions were employed to model the suitability for dive sites existence in the Portuguese south coast (Algarve), one of the most popular Summer destinations in mainland Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • 777 E. Princeton St. Orlando, FL 32803 • 407.514.2000 • EDUCATOR’S GUIDE 2018 – 2019 1 TABLE of CONTENTS
    777 E. Princeton St. Orlando, FL 32803 • 407.514.2000 • www.osc.org EDUCATOR’S GUIDE 2018 – 2019 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Our programs and activities are a direct result of the wonderful support & feedback we’ve received from you! TABLE OF CONTENTS ONLINE RESOURCES EDUCATORS ALWAYS FREE* We Appreciate What You Do! What is STEM? ………….……………………… 3 Engage your students before and after your trip! We are Field Trips Information & Pricing ……………… 4 Educators are always free* for gen- proud to be able to give teach- eral day admission. Please present a Discovery Labs ……………………………… 5 – 8 ers pre- and post-visit activities valid teaching I.D. at the Admissions designed to complement your Desk. Call 407.514.2000 for ad- STEM Workshop Series ……………………… 9 Orlando Science Center vis- ditional information. it. These forms and materials Adventures In Engineering …………………… 10 are available on the Orlando * Free admission not applicable to Live Programs ………….……………………… 11 Science Center website at field trips or blockbuster exhibits. osc.org/educators Special Offerings ……….……………………… 12 Policies & Procedures ……….………………… 13 Lunch & Parking ……………………………… 14 SAVE THE DATE! Directions & Parking ……….………………… 15 August 25, 2018 • 10:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m. Building Interior Map ……….………………… 17 Educator Open House Current Exhibits ……………………………… 16 Come see how the Orlando Science Center can help you rein- force science concepts in a fun and interactive way. Please RSVP Traveling Exhibits ……………………………… 17 407.514.2112 or [email protected]. Educators may bring up to 3 Educational Films ………………………… 18 – 20 additional guests. Valid teaching ID required. Professional Development …………………… 21 Offsite Programs ………………………… 22 – 25 SPONSOR Orlando Science Center is supported by United Arts of Central Florida, host of power2give.org/centralflorida and the collaborative Campaign for the Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy SURTASS LFA Sonar Activities 2019
    Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy SURTASS LFA Sonar Activities Consultation No. OPR-2019-00120 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Consultation History ........................................................................................................ 3 2 The Assessment Framework ................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Evidence Available for the Consultation ......................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Approach to Assessing Effects to Marine Mammals ................................................ 9 2.1.2 Approach to Assessing Effects to Sea Turtles ........................................................ 24 3 Description of the Proposed Action ................................................................................... 25 3.1 The Navy’s Proposed Action ......................................................................................... 26 3.2 Description of the Surveillance Towed Array Sensor System (SURTASS) Low Frequency Active (LFA) Sonar System ................................................................................... 28 3.2.1 Passive Sonar System Components ........................................................................ 29 3.2.2 Active
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impacts of Washington State Resident Scuba Divers
    Economic Impacts of Washington State Resident Scuba Divers Prepared for SeaDoc Society March 2016 Prepared by Preparers Team Member Project Role Katharine Wellman Project Manager Leah Cuyno Senior Analyst Gary Eaton Analyst Logan Blair Analyst Terri McCoy Editor Please cite as: Northern Economics, Inc. Economic Impacts of Washington State Resident Scuba Divers. Prepared for SeaDoc Society. March, 2016. Contents Section Page Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgments: ................................................................................................................................. iv Abstract ............................................................................................................................................... v 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 2 Review of the Literature ........................................................................................................... 3 3 Methods .................................................................................................................................. 7 3.1 Survey ......................................................... 8 3.2 Model .......................................................... 9 4 Data Analysis: Resident Divers and Dive Shop Operators ..........................................................
    [Show full text]