Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenGrey Repository A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details American Segregationist Ideology and White Southern Africa, 1948-1975 Zoe L. Hyman DPhil American History, Literature and Social Studies University of Sussex September 2011 I hereby declare that this thesis has not been and will not be submitted in whole or in part to another University for the award of any other degree. Zoe Hyman UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX Zoe L. Hyman DPhil American History, Literature and Social Studies American Segregationist Ideology and White Southern Africa, 1948-1975 SUMMARY This thesis examines the relationship between segregationist organisations, publications and individuals in the United States and their pro-apartheid counterparts in southern Africa. It uncovers a sustained and extensive foreign policy of segregationists that has hitherto been overlooked and a relationship between the countries that goes beyond existing analyses of Cold War cooperation or comparative studies of the countries’ racial systems. When the civil rights movement began, steadfast segregationists in the American South looked further afield for support, inspiration and ideological affirmation of their belief in white supremacy. They found this in South Africa and its apartheid policies as well as in other right-wing organisations and individuals outside the American South. Through the archives of segregationist organisations, civil rights organisations, anti-communist groups, individuals, governmental records and newspapers, this thesis charts the journey southern segregationists took from the creation of massive resistance in 1954 – a movement focused on regional problems – to a dramatically less isolationist standpoint one decade later. By 1965, white southern Africa had really captured the imagination of segregationists, alliances had been forged and when massive resistance failed, segregationists did not retreat from their international agenda. Although South Africa was a focal point of segregationists’ attention during massive resistance, they also became committed to white rule in Rhodesia after 1965. This thesis examines the groups across America that supported the isolated bastions of white supremacy in southern Africa and demonstrates that the Cold War alliance between U.S. and southern African governments inadvertently helped to maintain and conceal the racism that drove segregationists to form fruitful links in southern Africa. The tangible and ideological links segregationists made abroad internationalised a concept of white supremacy in which race trumped nationality. This global white supremacy has endured and reveals that segregationists were not insignificant reactionaries with a short lived movement but people who affected race relations in the long term. For my parents, Catherine and Leslie Hyman CONTENTS Acknowledgments ————— vii Introduction ————— 1 Chapter One ————— A Hot Alliance in a Cold War: America’s Foreign Policy towards South Africa, 1948-1965 31 Chapter Two ————— Transnational Civil Rights: The NAACP, South Africa and the International Fight for Racial Equality, 1948-1965 72 Chapter Three ————— The Foreign Policy of Massive Resistance: Segregationists and South Africa, 1954-1965 108 Chapter Four ————— Massive Resisters after Massive Resistance: Segregationists, South Africa and Rhodesia, 1965-1975 157 Chapter Five ————— Organised Assistance: Rhodesia’s American Friends, 1965-1975 189 Conclusion ————— 235 Bibliography ————— 245 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It would not have been possible to write this thesis without the help and support of those around me. I extend my sincere gratitude to my supervisors at the University of Sussex. It has been a privilege to learn from Clive Webb and Saul Dubow and I am indebted to them both for their contributions to this thesis. I would like to thank Clive for the time and effort he has put into my development as a historian over the years. In autumn 2002, Clive taught a course on American history in the twentieth century. I was a second year undergraduate in that class and Clive inspired in me a passion for the subject. His mentoring and encouragement ever since has been invaluable. I would also like to thank Saul for his support and assistance throughout this project and for introducing me to research and lines of enquiry that I might not otherwise have come across. I am also grateful to the faculty of the American Studies department at Sussex for supporting my ambitions and offering such helpful advice and encouragement along the way. There are also a number of friends who have given me intellectual and emotional support throughout this project: Nadja Janssen, Roger Johnson, Kate Nowicki, Basmah Fahim and Kate Mason. I would like to thank Adam Hyman, who is a wonderful brother, and Ben Postlethwaite, who has been at my side for most of this project and given me love and encouragement throughout. Finally, my deepest gratitude goes to my parents, Catherine and Leslie Hyman, for their unquestioning love and support. Without them, none of this would have been possible. 1 Introduction In April 1978, conservative political columnist Holmes Alexander reported the passing of the segregationist old guard. ‘With its unfailing sense of drama’, he wrote, ‘history contrived that Mississippi Sen. Jim Eastland, 73, announced the termination of his three- decade national service at approximately the time Rhodesian Prime Minister Ian Smith conceded the end of white minority rule in his country’. For Alexander, this was more than just coincidental timing; the symbolism of these two men bowing out just days apart represented a momentous change. ‘When an Eastland retires and an Ian Smith sits down in an executive council with Africans’, he wrote somewhat remorsefully, ‘you know this is a different world than the one most of us were born into’.1 The course of race relations in the United States and southern Africa did appear to be shifting with key players in the perpetuation of racial inequality finally beginning to relent and retire. Mississippi Senator James O. Eastland, a relic of segregation and massive resistance, announced that he would not seek re-election to the United States Senate. Since his election in 1941, Eastland had been a staunch conservative on all issues, especially race, and gained notoriety during the 1950s and 1960s for blocking and delaying civil rights reform. Mississippi had been the citadel of white supremacy in the American South and Eastland’s commitment to segregation remained long after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Right Act of 1965 had put the final nail in Jim Crow’s coffin. Less than ten years later, however, the re-enfranchisement of African Americans ensured that Eastland 1 Holmes Alexander, ‘The Masters Of A Divine Plan’, News and Courier (Charleston, South Carolina), 9 April 1978, 14-A. 2 was all but certain to lose a re-election campaign. Eastland’s retirement coincided with the beginning of a transition to black majority rule in Rhodesia, a settlement reached in no small part due to pressure from the United States and South Africa for Rhodesia’s Prime Minister, Ian Smith, to capitulate. Smith had ruled Rhodesia, with the support of Americans like Eastland, since his white minority government unilaterally declared its independence from Britain in 1965. Rather than concede to black rule, Smith stubbornly governed an illegal state for fifteen years. Just five months later, in September 1978, the National Party elected Pieter Willem Botha to be its leader and prime minister of South Africa. He took over the apartheid state with a language of reform and challenged white South Africans to ‘adapt or die’.2 Botha had taken office at a difficult time. His predecessor, John Vorster, had been forced to resign after a scandal in which government funds were used for propaganda purposes overseas; the southern white bloc that had buffered South Africa had disintegrated, leaving the country more politically isolated than ever; and for the first time the United Nations had adopted a mandatory arms embargo against South Africa.3 Like his predecessors, Botha was a fierce opponent of black rule, but he also recognised that reform was needed – not because he doubted the philosophy of apartheid, but because he saw political reform as the only way to ensure the ‘security and survival’ of whites.4 2 Deon Geldenhuys, The Diplomacy of Isolation: South African Foreign Policy Making (Johannesburg: Macmillan South Africa, 1984), 36. 3 The independence of Angola and Mozambique in 1975 and negotiations in Rhodesia bought black rule to the southern region of Africa, which had previously been characterised by white minority and colonial rule. United Nations Resolution 418 (4 November 1977) revoked the 1963 voluntary arms embargo and replaced it with a mandatory one. 4 James Barber and John Barratt, South Africa’s Foreign Policy: The Search for Status and Security, 1945- 1988 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 248. See also Robert M. Price, ‘Apartheid and White Supremacy: the Meaning of Government-Led Reform in the South African Context’, in Robert M. Price and 3 Botha’s reform would be mixed with severe repression and it would take until 1994 for South Africa to make the transition to black majority rule. However, Alexander was right; it was a markedly different world. Out of the horrors of World War II, oppressed minorities and majorities across the globe had begun to demand freedom and equality.
Recommended publications
  • The "Virginian-Pilot" Newspaper's Role in Moderating Norfolk, Virginia's 1958 School Desegregation Crisis
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations in Urban Services - College of Education & Professional Studies Urban Education (Darden) Winter 1991 The "Virginian-Pilot" Newspaper's Role in Moderating Norfolk, Virginia's 1958 School Desegregation Crisis Alexander Stewart Leidholdt Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/urbanservices_education_etds Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Education Commons, Journalism Studies Commons, Mass Communication Commons, and the Race and Ethnicity Commons Recommended Citation Leidholdt, Alexander S.. "The "Virginian-Pilot" Newspaper's Role in Moderating Norfolk, Virginia's 1958 School Desegregation Crisis" (1991). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), dissertation, , Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/tb1v-f795 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/urbanservices_education_etds/119 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Education & Professional Studies (Darden) at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations in Urban Services - Urban Education by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 THE VIRGINIAN-PILOT NEWSPAPER'S ROLE IN MODERATING NORFOLK, VIRGINIA'S 1958 SCHOOL DESEGREGATION CRISIS by Alexander Stewart Leidholdt B.A. May 1978, Virginia Wesleyan College M.S. May 1980, Clarion University Ed.S. December 1984, Indiana University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion Unversity in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY URBAN SERVICES OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY December, 1991 Approved By: Maurice R. Berube, Dissertation Chair Concentration Area^TFlrector ember Dean of the College of Education Member Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Massive Resistance.Ppt [Read-Only]
    MassiveMassive ResistanceResistance VViirrggiinniiaa 11995544--11996644 MMaassssivivee RReessisisttaannccee In 1896, in Plessy v. Ferguson, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that separate but equal facilities were legal. This ruling upheld the idea of separation of the races and enforced the Jim Crow laws. MMaassssivivee RReessisisttaannccee Under the Jim Crow laws, life in the south was strictly segregated. Theaters, schools, waiting rooms, restaurants, even water fountains were segregated. MMaassssivivee RReessisisttaannccee After World War II, however, there was a desire for change. African Americans were no longer willing to accept the Jim Crow laws. MMaassssivivee RReessisisttaannccee President Truman issued an Executive Order integrating the Armed Forces in 1947.With his signature, the President, as Commander in Chief, ended segregation – in the Armed Forces, but not in the rest of society! Life was still segregated throughout the south. MMaassssivivee RReessisisttaannccee Schools and other facilities were supposed to be “separate but equal”. They were separate, but rarely were they equal! African American schools often went without indoor plumbing and heating systems. MMaassssivivee RReessisisttaannccee In 1954, The United States Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education, that “Separate but equal was inherently unequal” and the Plessy decision of 1896 was overturned. Separate facilities were no longer legal. MMaassssivivee RReessisisttaannccee Senator Harry Byrd, Sr. of Virginia said the Brown decision “will bring implications and dangers of the greatest consequence.” He went on to announce that he would use all legal means to continue segregated schools in Virginia! MMaassssivivee RReessisisttaannccee Governor Stanley of Virginia appointed a commission to look at options for defying the Brown decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Pieces of a Woman
    PIECES OF A WOMAN Directed by Kornél Mundruczó Starring Vanessa Kirby, Shia LaBeouf, Molly Parker, Sarah Snook, Iliza Shlesinger, Benny Safdie, Jimmie Falls, Ellen Burstyn **WORLD PREMIERE – In Competition – Venice Film Festival 2020** **OFFICIAL SELECTION – Gala Presentations – Toronto International Film Festival 2020** Press Contacts: US: Julie Chappell | [email protected] International: Claudia Tomassini | [email protected] Sales Contact: Linda Jin | [email protected] 1 SHORT SYNOPSIS When an unfathomable tragedy befalls a young mother (Vanessa Kirby), she begins a year-long odyssey of mourning that touches her husband (Shia LaBeouf), her mother (Ellen Burstyn), and her midwife (Molly Parker). Director Kornél Mundruczó (White God, winner of the Prix Un Certain Regard Award, 2014) and partner/screenwriter Kata Wéber craft a deeply personal meditation and ultimately transcendent story of a woman learning to live alongside her loss. SYNOPSIS Martha and Sean Carson (Vanessa Kirby, Shia LaBeouf) are a Boston couple on the verge of parenthood whose lives change irrevocably during a home birth at the hands of a flustered midwife (Molly Parker), who faces charges of criminal negligence. Thus begins a year-long odyssey for Martha, who must navigate her grief while working through fractious relationships with her husband and her domineering mother (Ellen Burstyn), along with the publicly vilified midwife whom she must face in court. From director Kornél Mundruczó (White God, winner of the Prix Un Certain Regard Award, 2014), with artistic support from executive producer Martin Scorsese, and written by Kata Wéber, Mundruczó’s partner, comes a deeply personal, searing domestic aria in exquisite shades of grey and an ultimately transcendent story of a woman learning to live alongside her loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft—April 9, 2008 Explaining Massive Resistance: the Debate
    Draft—April 9, 2008 Explaining Massive Resistance: The Debate over the Capacity of the Law to Promote Racial Equality, 1954-1964 Christopher W. Schmidt American Bar Foundation *** This is very much a work-in-progress. Please do not cite or quote without the author’s permission *** ABSTRACT In this article, I examine how those who supported the Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) understood and explained the subsequent rise of massive resistance to school desegregation and the conspicuous failures of the Court’s mandate throughout the South. My analysis draws on several interrelated historical claims. First, that Brown was initially greeted with a striking degree of optimism toward the prospects for successful implementation. This optimism was, in large part, the product of arguments activists and scholars had been making in the years preceding Brown about the capacity of legal reform to promote the cause of racial equality. Racial liberals argued that white supremacist attitudes were not as entrenched as was commonly assumed, and that the law could play a powerful pedagogical role as a definer of moral value. But by 1956, as the white South mobilized in defiance of the Court’s desegregation mandate, these legalist assumptions about the reformist potential of the rule of law and the nature of southern race relations came under assault. Massive resistance, unexpected in its strength, scope, and the bluntness of its refutation of federal authority, forced those who had previously touted law’s capacity to reconsider their positions. Some sought to downplay the extent of Brown’s failures, or to explain resistance as the product of ineffective, tentative application of the law, rather than any flaw in the assumption that laws could uproot entrenched customs.
    [Show full text]
  • Massive Resistance and the Origins of the Virginia Technical College System
    Inquiry: The Journal of the Virginia Community Colleges Volume 22 | Issue 2 Article 6 10-10-2019 Massive Resistance and the Origins of the Virginia Technical College System Richard A. Hodges Ed.D., Thomas Nelson Community College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.vccs.edu/inquiry Part of the Higher Education Commons, History Commons, and the Politics and Social Change Commons Recommended Citation Hodges, R. A. (2019). Massive Resistance and the Origins of the Virginia Technical College System. Inquiry: The Journal of the Virginia Community Colleges, 22 (2). Retrieved from https://commons.vccs.edu/inquiry/vol22/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ VCCS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Inquiry: The ourJ nal of the Virginia Community Colleges by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ VCCS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hodges: Massive Resistance and the Origins of the VTCS MASSIVE RESISTANCE AND THE ORIGINS OF THE VIRGINIA TECHNICAL COLLEGE SYSTEM RICHARD A. HODGES INTRODUCTION In the summer of 1964, Dr. Dana B. Hamel, Director of the Roanoke Technical Institute in Roanoke, Virginia received a phone call that would change the course of Virginia higher education. The call was from Virginia Governor Albertis Harrison requesting Hamel serve as the Director of the soon to be established Department of Technical Education. The department, along with its governing board, would quickly establish a system of technical colleges located regionally throughout Virginia, with the first of those colleges opening their doors for classes in the fall of 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia's Massive Folly
    Undergraduate Research Journal at UCCS Volume 2.1, Spring 2009 Virginia’s “Massive Folly”: Harry Byrd, Prince Edward County, and the Front Line Laura Grant Dept. of History, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Abstract This paper examines the closure of public schools in Prince Edward County, Virginia from 1959- 1964 in an effort to avoid desegregation. Specifically, the paper traces the roots of the political actions which led to the closure and then-Governor Harry Byrd's role in Virginia's political machine at the time. The paper argues that it was Byrd's influence which led to the conditions that not only made the closure possible in Virginia, but encouraged the white citizens of Prince Edward County to make their stand. In September, 1959, the public schools in Prince Edward County, Virginia closed their doors to all students. While most white students were educated in makeshift private schools, the doors of public education remained closed until the Supreme Court ordered the schools to reopen in 1964. This drastic episode in Virginia’s history was a response to the public school integration mandated by the Brown vs. Board of Education decision in 1954. Prince Edward County was not the only district in Virginia to take this action; it was merely the most extreme case of resistance after state laws banning integration were struck down as unconstitutional. Schools all over the state closed, most only temporarily, and the white community rallied to offer white students assistance to attend segregated private schools rather than face integration in a movement termed “Massive Resistance.” While this “Brown backlash” occurred all over the South, it was most prevalent in the Deep South.
    [Show full text]
  • The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Freedom of Information (FOI) Request Log, 2000-2012
    Description of document: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Freedom of Information (FOI) Request Log, 2000-2012 Requested date: 08-August-2011 Released date: 07-February-2012 Posted date: 20-February-2012 Title of document Freedom of Information Requests Date/date range of document: 23-April-2000 – 05-January-2012 Source of document: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey FOI Administrator Office of the Secretary 225 Park Avenue South, 17th Floor New York, NY 10003 Fax: (212) 435-7555 Online Electronic FOIA Request Form The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.
    [Show full text]
  • Roanoke School Desegregation and the Politics of Delay
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2013 Integrating "The Star City of the South": Roanoke School Desegregation and the Politics of Delay Peter Carr Jones College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Other Education Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Jones, Peter Carr, "Integrating "The Star City of the South": Roanoke School Desegregation and the Politics of Delay" (2013). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626722. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-sa7m-en67 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Integrating “the Star City of the South”: Roanoke School Desegregation and the Politics of Delay Peter Carr Jones Clearwater, Florida Bachelor of Arts, Washington and Lee University, 2006 A Thesis presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts Lyon Gardiner Tyler Department of History The College of William and Mary May 2013 Integrating “the Star City of the South”: Roanoke School Desegregation and the Politics of Delay Peter Carr Jones Clearwater, Florida Bachelor of Arts, Washington and Lee University, 2006 A Thesis presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts Lyon Gardiner Tyler Department of History The College of William and Mary May 2013 APPROVAL PAGE This Thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts ^ 1 / F^eter Carr Jones Approved by the Committee, January 2013 ___________ Committee Chair Scott Reynolds Nelson, Legum Professpr of History College of William and Ma M Davison Douglas Dean and Arthur B.
    [Show full text]
  • Endnotes to Dances with Devils {Original Publication Dates Appear
    Endnotes to Dances With Devils {Original publication dates appear within brackets like these} Eric Ward, ed., Conspiracies: Real Griev- 1 ances, Paranoia, and Mass Movements, This article is adapted from working papers and the draft (Seattle, Northwest Coalition Against Mali- manuscript for Too Close for Comfort, by Chip Berlet & Matthew N. Lyons, forthcoming, Guilford Press. cious Harassment [Peanut Butter Publish- Many of the themes and ideas expressed in this paper ing], 1996). are the result of our joint work. Seminars hosted by 2 The analysis of apocalyptic demonization and millenni- historian Richard Landes, director of the Center for alism in this paper is drawn primarily from the fol- Millennial Studies (CMS), at Boston University, lowing sources: helped me frame this discussion, as did discussions For apocalypticism: Paul Boyer, When Time Shall with Sara Diamond, Fred Clarkson, Philip Lamy, Be No More: Prophecy Belief in Modern Aaron Katz, and Erin Miller. A number of people, American Culture, (Cambridge, MA: too numerous to list here, graciously made useful Belknap/Harvard University Press, 1992); comments based on earlier drafts and conference pa- Charles B. Strozier, Apocalypse: On the pers, and I thank them for their assistance. Psychology of Fundamentalism in America, Portions of this article first appeared in: (Boston: Beacon Press, 1994); Stephen O'Leary, Arguing the Apocalypse: A Theory Chip Berlet, "Apocalypse Soon: Are You Tar- of Millennial Rhetoric, (New York: Oxford geted as an Agent of the Antichrist? As the University Press, 1994); Robert Fuller, Year 2000 Approaches, the List Grows..." Naming the Antichrist: The History of an The Boston Globe, 7/19/98, Focus Section, American Obsession, (New York: Oxford p.
    [Show full text]
  • 20Th Century Virginia Study Guide (Answer Key)
    Name/Number: _____________________________ Date: _____________ 20th Century Virginia Study Guide (Answer Key) Standard VS.9a: SWBAT demonstrate knowledge of twentieth and twenty- first centuries Virginia by describing the economic and social transition from a rural, agricultural society to a more urban, industrialized society, including the reasons people came to Virginia from other states and countries. During the early twentieth century, agriculture began to change. Old systems of farming were no longer effective. Crop prices were low. Growth of Virginia’s cities People moved from rural to urban areas for economic opportunities. Technological developments in transportation, roads, railroads, and streetcars helped cities grow. Coal mining spurred the growth of Virginia towns and cities as people moved from the countryside to find jobs. During the 20th Century, Northern Virginia has experienced growth due to increases in the number of federal jobs located in the region. In the late 20th century and the early 21st century, Northern Virginia and the Tidewater region have grown due to computer technology. People have moved to Virginia from many other states and nations. Standard VS.9b: SWBAT demonstrate knowledge of twentieth and twenty- first centuries Virginia by identifying the impact of Virginians on international events. Woodrow Wilson was a 20th Century President who wrote a plan for world peace. George C. Marshall was a military leader who created an economic plan to ensure world peace. Standard VS.9c: SWBAT demonstrate knowledge of twentieth and twenty- first centuries Virginia by identifying the social and political events in Virginia linked to desegregation and Massive Resistance and their relationship to national history.
    [Show full text]
  • John Canoe) Festivals of the Caribbean
    New West Indian Guide Vol. 84, no. 3-4 (2010), pp. 179-223 URL: http://www.kitlv-journals.nl/index.php/nwig/index URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-100888 Copyright: content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License ISSN: 1382-2373 KENNETH BILBY SURVIVING SECULARIZATION: MASKING THE SPIRIT IN THE JANKUNU (JOHN CANOE) FESTIVALS OF THE CARIBBEAN In certain parts of the Americas colonized by the English and built with the labor of Africans and their descendants, the holiday season at the end of the year was once – and in some areas still is – celebrated by parading bands of masqueraders whose danced processions created an ambiguous, highly charged space of their own.1 These outdoor performances by enslaved Africans amused, mystified, and discomfited the Europeans who observed and wrote about them during the nineteenth century. The loud drumming and singing, “wild” dancing, and “extravagant” costumes topped with horned ani- mal masks and towering headdresses overloaded the senses of these white onlookers, and suggested to them something inscrutably and dangerously African, even when certain European elements could be recognized within the unfamiliar mix. Unlike the pre-Lenten Catholic carnivals that were appropri- ated and refashioned by Africans in several parts of the Americas, this was a festival created by the enslaved themselves. Over time it was accepted by the ruling whites, who came to view it as a necessary evil – a kind of safety valve through which the simmering tensions on slave plantations could be periodi- 1. This article is based on comparative fieldwork and library research supported by a Rockefeller Fellowship at the Center for Black Music Research in Chicago and the Alton Augustus Adams Music Research Institute in St.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Trauma Through Fantasy
    IN-BETWEEN WORLDS: EXPLORING TRAUMA THROUGH FANTASY Amber Leigh Francine Shields A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2018 Full metadata for this thesis is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this thesis: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/16004 This item is protected by original copyright This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 4 Abstract While fantasy as a genre is often dismissed as frivolous and inappropriate, it is highly relevant in representing and working through trauma. The fantasy genre presents spectators with images of the unsettled and unresolved, taking them on a journey through a world in which the familiar is rendered unfamiliar. It positions itself as an in-between, while the consequential disturbance of recognized world orders lends this genre to relating stories of trauma themselves characterized by hauntings, disputed memories, and irresolution. Through an examination of films from around the world and their depictions of individual and collective traumas through the fantastic, this thesis outlines how fantasy succeeds in representing and challenging histories of violence, silence, and irresolution. Further, it also examines how the genre itself is transformed in relating stories that are not yet resolved. While analysing the modes in which the fantasy genre mediates and intercedes trauma narratives, this research contributes to a wider recognition of an understudied and underestimated genre, as well as to discourses on how trauma is narrated and negotiated.
    [Show full text]