Law Singapore Sling: How Coercion May Cure the Hangover in Financial Benchmark Governance Justin O’Brien October 2013 CLMR RESEARCH PAPER SERIES WORKING PAPER NO. 13-7 Singapore Sling: How Coercion May Cure the Hangover in Financial Benchmark Governance Justin O’Brien is an Australian Research Council Future Fellow, Professor of Law and Director of the Centre for Law, Markets and Regulation, UNSW Law, The University of New South Wales. He is also a Visiting Lab Fellow at the Edmond J Safra Centre for Ethics, Harvard University. A specialist in the dynamics of financial regulation he has written extensively on the interaction between governance of capital markets and ethical considerations. He is the author of a trilogy of books on financial crises and their aftermath – Wall Street on Trial (2003), Redesigning Financial Regulation (2007) and Engineering a Financial Bloodbath (2009) – as well as editor of a series of collections, most recently Integrity, Risk and Accountability in Capital Markets: Regulating Culture (2013). UNSW Law, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Sydney, NSW 2052 Email:
[email protected] Abstract The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) has formalized a set of principles designed to restore confidence in a range of systemically important financial benchmarks. The alacrity with which IOSCO has moved and its endorsement by the G20 is notable. It is far from clear, however, whether the principles provide a basis for sustainable reform. This derives from diametrically conflicting views within IOSCO as to whether benchmarks based on hypothetical submissions can be reformed or must be replaced by systems anchored in observed transactions.