DOCSLIB.ORG

Progress of Stream Measurements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Progress of Stream Measurements 4* Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 174 Series P, Hydrographic Progress Reports, 50 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR RETURN TO THE BOOKCASES & FILES c THE HYDRO-COMPUTING SECTION, WATL RESOURqg^RQpgiji UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, WASHINGTON, D.C PROGRESS OF STREAM MEASUREMENTS THE CALENDAR YEAR 1905 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF F. H. NEWELL PART X, Western Gulf of Mexico and Rio Grande Drainages BY T. U. TAYLOR and JOHN C. HOYT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1906 CONTENTS. Introduction.... .....................__.................._...._......_... 1 Organization and scope of work ....................................... 1 Definitions. ....................................^..................... 3 Explanation of tables................................................. 4 Convenient equivalents............................................... 5 Field methods of measuring stream flow ............................... 6 Office methods of computing run-off................................... 10 Cooperation and acknowledgments .................................... 12 Sabine River drainage basin............................................... 13 Description of basin .................................................. 13 Sabine River near Longview, Tex...................................... 13 Neches River at Evadale, Tex.......................................... 15 Trinity River drainage basin .............................................. 17 Description of basin .................................................. 17 Trinity River at Riverside, Tex ....................................... 17 Brazos River drainage basin............................................... 19 Description of basin .................................................. 19 Brazos River at Waco, Tex ................'....................*........ 19 Brazos River at Richmond, Tex....................................... 21 Colorado River (of Texas) drainage basin.................................. 24 Description of basin ...._._..........____ ............................ 24 Colorado River at Austin, Tex ........................................ 24 Colorado River at Columbus, Tex ..................................... 27 San Saba River near San Saba, Tex..................................... 29 Bartons Springs near Austin, Tex...................................... 30 Guadalupe River drainage basin........................................... 31 Description of basin .................................................. 31 Guadalupe River near Cuero, Tex..................................... 31 Comal River at New Braunfels, Tex................................... 33 San Antonio River drainage basin ......................................... 34 Description of basin .................................................. 34 San Antonio River at San Antonio, Tex................................ 34 Nueces River drainage basin .............................................. 35 Description of basin .................................................. 35 Leona River at Uvalde, Tex ........................................... 35 Rio Grande drainage basin. ............................................... 35 Description of basin .................................... ............. 35 Rio Grande near Del Norte, Colo...................................... 36 Rio Grande near Lobatos, Colo ......................................... 39 Rio Grande near San Ildefonso, N. Mex ................-...-..-.'.--.-- 41 Rio Grande near San Marcial, N. Mex................................. 43 Rio Grande near El Paso, Tex................... .... ................ 49 Rio Grande above Presidio, Tex....................................... 54 in IV CONTENTS. Rio Grande drainage basin Continued. Page. Rio Conchos near Ojinaga, Mexico .................................... 58 Rio Grande below Presidio, Tex ...................................... 58 Rio Grande near Langtry, Tex .......................i................ 63 Rio Grande below mouth of Devils River, Tex .......................... 67 Rio Grande at Eagle Pass, Tex........................................ 71 Rio Grande near Laredo, Tex......................................... 76 Rio Grande near Roma, Tex.......................................... 78 Rio Grande near Brownsville, Tex ..................................... 81 Rio Salada near Guerrero, Tamaulipas, Mexico......................... 84 Rio San Juan near Santa Rosalia ranch, Tamaulipas, Mexico............ 87 Conejos River near Mogote, Colo...................................... 90 Pecos River at Santa Rosa, N. Mex.................."..............-... 93 Pecos River near Fort Sumner, N. Mex................................ 95 Pecos River near Roswell, N. Mex .................................... 97 Pecos River near Dayton, N. Mex. ..................................... 99 Pecos River at Carlsbad, N. Mex.._.........._..............-......... 102 Pecos River and Margueretta flume near Pecos, Tex.................... 105 Pecos River near Moorhead, Tex...................................... 110 Gallinas River near Las Vegas, N. Mex................................ 115 Hondo River at Roswell, N. Mex..........-.-...-.,.......---.-....... 117 Hondo River at Hondo reservoir site, N. Mex.......................... 118 Taylor-Moore ditch near Roswell, N. Mex ............................. 120 Penasco River near Dayton, N. Mex................................... 121 Devils River at Devils River, Tex...................................... 123 San Felipe Creek at Del Rio, Tex...................................... 127 Las Moras Creek near Brackettville, Tex..................-'............ 127 ILLUSTRATIONS. Page. PLATE I. Map showing location of principal gaging stations in the United States. 2 FIG. 1. Cable station, showing section of the river, car, gage, etc..........----. 7 2. Discharge, mean-velocity, and area curves for South Fork of Skykomish River near Index, Wash........................... .-.-.....-.-.-.. 11 PROGRESS REPORT OF STREAM MEASUREMENTS FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1905. PART X. By T. U. TAYLOR and JOHN C. HOYT. INTRODUCTION. ORGANIZATION AND SCOPE OF WORK. The hydrographic work of the United States Geological Survey includes the col­ lection of facts concerning and the study of conditions affecting the behavior of water from the time it reaches the earth as rain or snow until it joins the oceans or great navigable rivers. These investigations became a distinct feature of the work of the Survey in the fall of 1888, when an instruction camp was established at Embudo, N. Mex. The first specific appropriation for gaging streams was made by the act of August 18, 1894, which contained an item of $12,500 "for gauging the streams and determining the water supply of the United States, including the investigation of underground currents and artesian wells in the arid and semiarid sections." (28 Stat. L., p. 398.) Since that time the appropriations have been gradually increased, as shown by the following table: Annual appropriations for hydrographic surveys for the fiscal years ending June 8.0, 1895 to 1906. 1895...................................... $12,500 1901...................................... $100,000 1896...................................... 20.000 1902...................................... 100,000 1897....................................... 50,000 1903...................................... 200,000 1898...................................... 50,000 1904...................................... 200,000 1899...................................... 50,000 1905...................................... 200,000 1900...................................... 50,000 1906...................................... 200,000 As a result of the increased appropriations the work has been greatly extended, and at the same time it has been more thoroughly systemized by the adoption of standard methods and by grouping the States into districts, in. each of which a dis­ trict hydrographer and a corps of assistants carry on a comprehensive study of the hydrographic resources. The chief features of the hydrographic work are the collection of data relating to the flow of the surface waters and the study of the conditions affecting this flow. Information is also collected concerning river profiles, duration and magnitude of floods, water power, etc., which may be of use in hydrographic studies. This work includes the study of the hydrography of every important river basin in the United States, and is of direct value in the commercial and agricultural development of the country. In order to collect the material from which estimates of daily flow are made, gaging stations are established. The selection of a site for a gaging station and the length of time it is maintained depend largely on the physical features and the needs of each locality. If the water is to be used for power, special effort is made to obtain 2 STREAM MEASUREMENTS IN 1905, PART X. information concerning the minimum flow; if water is to be stored; the maximum flow receives special attention. In all sections of the country permanent gaging stations are maintained for general statistical purposes to show the conditions exist­ ing through long periods. They are also used as primary stations, and their records, in connection with short series of measurements, serve as bases for estimating the flow at other points in the drainage basin. During the calendar year 1905 the Division of Hydrography has continued meas­ uring the flow of streams on the same
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2021 OHV Grant Recommended Funding Approval
    State Trails Program 13787 US Hwy. 85 N., Littleton, Colorado 80125 P 303.791.1957 | F 303.470-0782 May 6-7, 2020 2020-2021 OHV Trail Grant funding awards as recommended by the State Recreational Trails Committee. This letter is a summary and explanation of the enclosed Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) 2020-2021 OHV Trail Grant funding recommendations for Parks and Wildlife Commission (PWC) approval during the May 2020 meeting. We are requesting approval for 60 grants for a total award amount of $4,273,860. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Colorado Parks and Wildlife Division’s (CPW) Trails Program, a statewide program within CPW, administers grants for trail-related projects on an annual basis. Local, county, and state governments, federal agencies, special recreation districts, and non-profit organizations with management responsibilities over public lands may apply for and are eligible to receive non- motorized and motorized trail grants. Colorado’s Off-highway Vehicle Trail Program CPW’s OHV Program is statutorily created in sections 33-14.5-101 through 33-14.5-113, Colorado Revised Statutes. The program is funded through the sale of OHV registrations and use permits. It is estimated that almost 200,000 OHVs were registered or permitted for use in Colorado during the 2019-2020 season. The price of an annual OHV registration or use- permit is $25.25. Funds are used to support the statewide OHV Program, the OHV Registration Program and OHV Trail Grant Program, including OHV law enforcement. The OHV Program seeks to improve and enhance motorized recreation opportunities in Colorado while promoting safe, responsible use of OHVs.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain Region Campground List
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION COLORADO CAMPGROUND LIST ARAPAHO & ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FORESTS (970) 295.6700 This Campground List contains all the Forest Service campgrounds located within the BOULDER RD* - BOULDER, CO (303) 541.2500 Rocky Mountain Region. The campgrounds are listed by State, National SITE # OF MAX BASE CAMPGROUND NAME Forest/Grassland, and Ranger District. Base Minimum Camping Fees are listed, but ELEVATION SITES SPUR FEE we cannot show additional fees that may be applicable (hook-ups, etc.). Most Rocky Camp Dick 8,650' 41 40' $19 R* Y Y Mountain Region campgrounds are open from Memorial Day through Labor Day. To Kelly Dahl 8,600' 46 40' $19 R* Y N find a campground's Open/Closed status, contact the appropriate Ranger District office. Campground locations are shown on each National Forest or Meeker Park 8,600' 29 35' $11 FC* N N Grassland Visitor Information Map and they can be viewed online at: Olive Ridge 8,350' 56 40' $19 R* Y N http://www.fs.usda.gov/goto/r2/recreation/camping Pawnee 10,400' 47 40' $19 R* Y Y Peaceful Valley 8,500' 17 30' $19 R* Y Y Rainbow Lakes 10,000' 14 40' $13 FC* N Y FOR CAMPGROUND RESERVATIONS GO TO: RECREATION.GOV CANYON LAKES RD* - FORT COLLINS, CO (970) 295.6700 SITE # OF MAX BASE 1.877.444.6777 www.recreation.gov CAMPGROUND NAME ELEVATION SITES SPUR FEE Campgrounds accepting reservations are marked with *R under the column with the Ansel Watrous 5,800' 17 45' $19 R* Y Y Recreation.gov logo above.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Statement, CPDWS, Rio Grand
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service CP District-wide Salvage Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Conejos Peak Ranger District, Rio Grande National Forest March 2018 Conejos and Rio Grande Counties, Colorado USDA NON-DISCRIMINATION POLICY STATEMENT DR 4300.003 USDA Equal Opportunity Public Notification Policy (June 2, 2015) In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g. Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD- 3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 OHV Trail Grants Funding Approval
    congressional districts, one member appointed from the state at large and one member that represents the GOCO Board. The Committee also serves as Colorado’s State Recreational Trail Advisory Committee as required by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to be eligible for RTP funds. To be in compliance with federal RTP funding eligibility rules, committee membership must include trail users and there must be representation of both off- road motorized recreational trail users and non-motorized recreational trail interests. The Committee oversees CPW’s annual trail grant application reviews, scoring and ranking processes and submits its recommendations for grant funding strategies to the Commission for their review, consideration and final approval. Appendix A lists the current Committee members. The 2018 OHV Grant Application and Review Process OHV grant applications are sent out by e-mail, ground mail, and are posted on the CPW’s Trails Program website each year. Trail grant opportunities are publicized annually through press releases, newsletters, the state website, and e-mail information networks. Technical assistance for grant preparation is provided by CPW Trails Program staff to potential applicants. The submission deadline for OHV grant applications is the first business day of December each year. The Commission, through its Policy A-104, has authorized a subcommittee structure to assist the Committee in formulating its grant recommendations. Subcommittee members are appointed to the Grant Review and Ranking Subcommittees for the purpose of reviewing and ranking grant applications and compiling funding recommendations for the Committee’s consideration. To solicit public comment, all grant applications are posted on the CPW Trails Program’s website and every public comment is evaluated as part of a subcommittee’s grant review and ranking process.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Rio Grande National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Rio Grande National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 11/28/2012 01/2013 Susan Ellsworth United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) 775-355-5313 Approach [email protected]. EIS us *UPDATED* Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Nationwide. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-7886 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Risk of Physical Contact Between Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep and Domestic Sheep in the Snow Mesa Sheep Allotment Grazing Landscape
    Assessment of Risk of Physical Contact between Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep and Domestic Sheep in the Snow Mesa Sheep Allotment Grazing Landscape Rio Grande National Forest Divide Ranger District Photo: Domestic sheep grazing below Baldy Cinco TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT 4 Why the Concern Now 6 ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED 8 KEY CONCEPTS, GUIDANCE AND RECOMMENDATION DOCUMENTS 10 HISTORY OF DOMESTIC SHEEP GRAZING ON THE SNOW MESA LANDSCAPE 12 CENTRAL SAN JUAN BIGHORN SHEEP HERD 14 AFFECTED BIGHORN SHEEP HERDS S-22 San Luis Peak Sub-Herd 18 S-53 Bristol Head Sub-Herd 20 S-36 Bellows Creek Sub-Herd 22 RISK OF CONTACT TOOL 24 DISEASE HISTORY 27 RISK ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES 29 RISK OF CONTACT TOOL RESULTS 30 Snow Mesa Allotment Alternative 2 34 Snow Mesa Allotment Alternative 3 36 Table Allotment Alternative 2 38 Table Allotment Alternative 3 40 Miners Allotment Alternative 2 42 Miners Allotment Alternative 3 44 Ouray Allotment Alternative 2 46 Ouray Allotment Alternative 3 47 SUMMARY TABLE 49 DISCUSSION 50 UNCERTAINTIES 51 LITERATURE CITED 56 APPENDIX 1: RISK OF CONTACT TOOL RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 2 58 APPENDIX 2: RISK OF CONTACT TOOL RESULTS FOR ALTERNATIVE 3 59 APPENDIX 3: RAM FORAY PROBABILITY FOR SUBGROUPS ALTERNATIVE 2 60 APPENDIX 4: RAM FORAY PROBABILTY CUMULATIVE FOR ALTERNATIVE 2 61 APPENDIX 5: RAM FORAY PROBABILITY FOR SUBGROUPS ALTERNATIVE 3 62 APPENDIX 6: RAM FORAY PROBABILTY CUMULATIVE FOR ALTERNATIVE 3 63 APPENDIX 7: PROJECT DESIGN CRITERIA 64 APPENDIX 8: RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS – FOUR STEP OUTLINE 68 2 INTRODUCTION The Snow Mesa Landscape is located approximately 5 miles northwest of Creede, Colorado within Mineral and Hinsdale Counties within the Divide Ranger District of the Rio Grande National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle's View of San Juan Mountains
    Eagle’s View of San Juan Mountains Aerial Photographs with Mountain Descriptions of the most attractive places of Colorado’s San Juan Mountains Wojtek Rychlik Ⓒ 2014 Wojtek Rychlik, Pikes Peak Photo Published by Mother's House Publishing 6180 Lehman, Suite 104 Colorado Springs CO 80918 719-266-0437 / 800-266-0999 [email protected] www.mothershousepublishing.com ISBN 978-1-61888-085-7 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced without permission in writing from the copyright owner. Printed by Mother’s House Publishing, Colorado Springs, CO, U.S.A. Wojtek Rychlik www.PikesPeakPhoto.com Title page photo: Lizard Head and Sunshine Mountain southwest of Telluride. Front cover photo: Mount Sneffels and Yankee Boy Basin viewed from west. Acknowledgement 1. Aerial photography was made possible thanks to the courtesy of Jack Wojdyla, owner and pilot of Cessna 182S airplane. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Section NE: The Northeast, La Garita Mountains and Mountains East of Hwy 149 5 San Luis Peak 13 3. Section N: North San Juan Mountains; Northeast of Silverton & West of Lake City 21 Uncompahgre & Wetterhorn Peaks 24 Redcloud & Sunshine Peaks 35 Handies Peak 41 4. Section NW: The Northwest, Mount Sneffels and Lizard Head Wildernesses 59 Mount Sneffels 69 Wilson & El Diente Peaks, Mount Wilson 75 5. Section SW: The Southwest, Mountains West of Animas River and South of Ophir 93 6. Section S: South San Juan Mountains, between Animas and Piedra Rivers 108 Mount Eolus & North Eolus 126 Windom, Sunlight Peaks & Sunlight Spire 137 7. Section SE: The Southeast, Mountains East of Trout Creek and South of Rio Grande 165 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Conejos Peak Ranger District Area on a Temporary Basis to Protect the Life, Health, Or !
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 3 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 8 8 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! ! 5 ! ! ! ! ! T ! ! ! ! ! ! ! C ! I ! ! ! ! ! ! R ! ! ! ! ! T ! ! ! ! ! ! S ! 7 ! 00 ! I ! ! ! ! ! D ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R ! ! ! ! ! ! E ! ! ! G ! ! D ! ! ! ! 4 ! I N ! VID ! ! A ! ! ! E ! ! ! ! ! R ! 3 R ! A ! ! ! N ! ! 3 K ! G ! ! ! E 3 ! A ! ! R ! ! ! ! ! ! ! E ! D 8 ! ! " IS P ! ! T ! 9 ! R ! ! ! ! I ! S ! ! C 7 ! ! ! T ! ! ! ! 265.2C ! ! O ! ! e r u t l u c i r g A f o t n e m t r a p e D s e t a t S d e t i n U ! J ! ! ! ! E ! !E ! ! ! ! ! N ! ! ! ! C O ! O ! ! N 350000 C 360000 ! 370000 ! 380000 E 390000 ! ! JO e c i v r e S t s e r o F ! 106°37'30"W 106°30'0"W ! 106°22'30"W 106°15'0"W ! S ! ! ! ! P 0 2 E ! A 2 ! ! 2 K 3 ! ! ! ! R ! A ! ! ! 8 PURPOSE AND CONTENTS ! N ! 7 ! ! ! G 8 ! 7 7 ! E ! R ! ! Legend 2 ! D 5 1 0 2 / 4 1 0 2 O D A R O L O C ! 0 ! ! I ! S ! 1 1 T ! ! 1 R ! ! I ! C ! ! ! T ! ! ! ! ! . ! ! ! ! ! . ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 2 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 OF THIS MAP Roads Open to Highway Legal Vehicles ! ! ! ! ! ! C ! ! ! A ! B ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! t a e r G s ' a c i r e m A ! ! Roads Open to All Vehicles
    [Show full text]
  • 2019/20 OHV Grant Recommended Funding
    STATE TRAILS PROGRAM 13787 US Highway 85 N, Littleton, Colorado 80125 P 303.791.1957 | F 303.470.0782 May 23, 2019 To: Members of the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission From: Jeff Ver Steeg, Acting Director Subject: 2019-2020 OHV Trail Grant funding awards as recommended by the State Recreational Trails Committee This letter is a summary and explanation of the enclosed Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) 2019-2020 OHV Trail Grant funding award recommendations for Parks and Wildlife Commission (PWC) approval during the June 2019 meeting. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Colorado Parks and Wildlife Division’s (CPW) Trails Program, a statewide program within Colorado’s Park and Wildlife Division, administers grants for trail-related projects on an annual basis. Local, county, and state governments, federal agencies, special recreation districts, and non-profit organizations with management responsibilities over public lands may apply for and are eligible to receive non-motorized and motorized OHV trails grants. Colorado’s Off-highway Vehicle Trail Program CPW’s OHV Program is statutorily created in sections 33-14.5-101 through 33-14.5-113, Colorado Revised Statutes. The program is funded through the sale of OHV registrations and use permits. It is estimated that over 170,000 OHVs were registered or permitted for use in Colorado during the 2018-2019 season. The price of an annual OHV registration or use-permit is $25.25. Funds are used to support the statewide OHV Program, the OHV Registration Program and OHV Trail Grant Program, including OHV law enforcement. The OHV Program seeks to improve and enhance motorized recreation opportunities in Colorado while promoting safe, responsible use of OHVs.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Pike and San Isabel National Forests and Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 11/28/2012 01/2013 Susan Ellsworth United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) 775-355-5313 Approach [email protected]. EIS us *UPDATED* Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Nationwide. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-7886 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable.
    [Show full text]