DOCSLIB.ORG

TERRITORY IRON Pty LTD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TERRITORY IRON Pty LTD TERRITORY IRON Pty LTD. Environmental Survey of Landscape, Flora and Fauna of Proposed Iron Mining within the Frances Creek Project Area Prepared for Territory Iron Pty. Ltd. By Tom Reilly, Dr Bill Low and Dennis Matthews LOW ECOLOGICAL SERVICES PO Box 3130, Alice Springs, N.T. 0871 Phone: (08) 89 555 222 Fax: (08) 89 555 722 Email: [email protected] November 2005 Environmental Survey of Landscape, Flora and Fauna of the Proposed Frances Creek Project Area, Nov 2005 CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................5 1.1 Existing Environment................................................................................................5 1.2 Conservation Considerations for the Frances Creek project area.........................6 2 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................9 2.1 Project Description....................................................................................................9 2.2 History of site..........................................................................................................10 3 SCOPE.............................................................................................................................12 4 SITE LOCATION AND REGIONAL DESCRIPTION.........................................................13 4.1 Location...................................................................................................................13 4.2 Climate.....................................................................................................................14 4.3 Biological Records..................................................................................................15 4.4 Land System Description........................................................................................15 4.5 Geology and Geomorphology................................................................................16 4.6 Soils.........................................................................................................................17 4.7 Fauna........................................................................................................................17 4.8 Vegetation................................................................................................................17 5 SURVEY METHODS........................................................................................................19 6 RESULTS.........................................................................................................................24 6.1 Natural Landscape..................................................................................................24 6.2 Frances Creek Land Unit Descriptions..................................................................24 6.3 Survey Site Vegetation Descriptions.....................................................................27 6.4 Fauna of the Frances Creek project area...............................................................32 7 CONSERVATION VALUE OF THE FRANCES CREEK PROJECT AREA (REGIONAL CONTEXT)...............................................................................................................................40 7.1 Habitat......................................................................................................................40 7.2 Flora.........................................................................................................................40 7.3 Fauna........................................................................................................................41 7.4 Landscape of the Frances Creek Project Area......................................................49 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.................................................................................................50 9 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................51 10 MAP 1A – SOUTHERN SECTION OF PROJECT AREA..............................................54 11 MAP 1B – NORTHERN SECTION OF PROJECT AREA.............................................55 2 Low Ecological Services November 2005 Environmental Survey of Landscape, Flora and Fauna of the Proposed Frances Creek Project Area, Nov 2005 12 PLATES........................................................................................................................56 12.1 Survey Sites.............................................................................................................56 12.2 Fauna........................................................................................................................63 12.3 Flora.........................................................................................................................69 12.4 Frances Creek village area.....................................................................................70 13 APPENDICES...............................................................................................................72 13.1 Trap capture results from the fauna survey within the Frances Creek project area, November 2005..........................................................................................................72 13.2 All mammals, reptiles and amphibians identified from the Frances Creek survey, November 2005...................................................................................................................74 13.3 Bird species recorded within the Frances Creek project area during November survey 2005.........................................................................................................................79 13.4 Vegetation Records from the Frances Creek flora survey, and other nearby flora surveys................................................................................................................................83 13.5 Mammals presently or potentially inhabiting the Frances Creek project area....94 13.6 Reptiles presently or potentially inhabiting the Frances Creek project area....100 13.7 Frogs, fish and inverts presently or potentially inhabiting the Frances Creek project area.......................................................................................................................108 13.8 Birds presently or potentially inhabiting the Frances Creek project area.........111 Figures Figure 2.1: Frances Creek project area and potential locations of iron ore mining areas...........11 Figure 4.1: Location Map showing Frances Creek project area.................................................13 Figure 4.2: Total rainfall (mm) and average maximum temperatures for the previous 12 months. ..........................................................................................................................................15 Figure 4.3: Land System Map of the Frances Creek project area..............................................16 Figure 4.4: Vegetation Map for the Frances Creek project area................................................18 Figure 6.1: Elliott trap success rate (%) for the three night trapping period at Frances Creek in November 2005................................................................................................................33 Tables Table 5.1: Brief description of survey sites with the type of assessment method used at each site....................................................................................................................................20 Table 5.2: Bat detector locations during the Frances Creek survey...........................................21 Table 5.3: Water sample locations and descriptions.................................................................22 Low Ecological Services 3 November 2005 Environmental Survey of Landscape, Flora and Fauna of the Proposed Frances Creek Project Area, Nov 2005 Table 5.4: Soil sample locations and descriptions.....................................................................22 Table 6.1: Lands Units of the Frances Creek project area, representative Survey Site and Plate Reference Number............................................................................................................24 Table 6.2: Results recorded by the ANABAT system during the Frances Creek survey............36 Table 7.1: Species of Conservation Significance that occur or could possibly occur within the Frances Creek project area...............................................................................................45 Table 7.2: Fauna species of Northern Territory conservation significance that have been recorded in surveys in the Pine Creek region between 1985 and 2006.............................48 Frontispiece: Iron Mining halted in 1974 due to cyclone Tracy and flooding and ore transport problems mitigated against reopening the mine at that time. Reappraisal and expansion of the mine is currently underway. Helene Pit 5 shows the revegetation after 30 years of natural rehabilitation. 4 Low Ecological Services November 2005 Environmental Survey of Landscape, Flora and Fauna of the Proposed Frances Creek Project Area, Nov 2005 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY An environmental survey of the Frances Creek Project area was conducted between November 11th and 15th, 2005 at the start of the wet season. The aim of the study was to conduct a baseline flora and fauna survey of the project area and collect
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Human-Mediated Introductions of Australian Acacias
    Diversity and Distributions, (Diversity Distrib.) (2011) 17, 771–787 S EDITORIAL Human-mediated introductions of PECIAL ISSUE Australian acacias – a global experiment in biogeography 1 2 1 3,4 David M. Richardson *, Jane Carruthers , Cang Hui , Fiona A. C. Impson , :H Joseph T. Miller5, Mark P. Robertson1,6, Mathieu Rouget7, Johannes J. Le Roux1 and John R. U. Wilson1,8 UMAN 1 Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of ABSTRACT - Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, MEDIATED INTRODUCTIONS OF Aim Australian acacias (1012 recognized species native to Australia, which were Matieland 7602, South Africa, 2Department of History, University of South Africa, PO Box previously grouped in Acacia subgenus Phyllodineae) have been moved extensively 392, Unisa 0003, South Africa, 3Department around the world by humans over the past 250 years. This has created the of Zoology, University of Cape Town, opportunity to explore how evolutionary, ecological, historical and sociological Rondebosch 7701, South Africa, 4Plant factors interact to affect the distribution, usage, invasiveness and perceptions of a Protection Research Institute, Private Bag globally important group of plants. This editorial provides the background for the X5017, Stellenbosch 7599, South Africa, 20 papers in this special issue of Diversity and Distributions that focusses on the 5Centre for Australian National Biodiversity global cross-disciplinary experiment of introduced Australian acacias. A Journal of Conservation Biogeography Research, CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box Location Australia and global. 1600, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 6Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Methods The papers of the special issue are discussed in the context of a unified Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa, framework for biological invasions.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape, Flora and Fauna Survey of the Proposed Frances Creek Iron-Ore Prospects, May 2006
    Landscape, Flora and Fauna Survey of the Proposed Frances Creek Iron-ore Prospects, May 2006 Survey 2: Landscape, Flora and Fauna Survey of the Proposed Frances Creek Iron-ore Prospects, May 2006 Integrated with Survey 1 (November 2005) Prepared for: Territory Iron Pty. Ltd. ACN: 100552118 Suite 4, 111 Colin st, West Perth, 6005 Phone: (08) 9483 5100 Fax: (08) 9483 5111 By: Tom Reilly, Dr Bill Low and Dennis Matthews LOW ECOLOGICAL SERVICES P/L ABN: 55 064 311 502 PO Box 3130, Alice Springs, N.T. 0871 Phone: (08) 89 555 222 Fax: (08) 89 555 722 Email: [email protected] June 2006 Low Ecological Services P/L 1 June 2006 Landscape, Flora and Fauna Survey of the Proposed Frances Creek Iron-ore Prospects, May 2006 CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................6 1.1 Existing Environment...............................................................................................6 1.2 Conservation Considerations for the Frances Creek project area........................8 2 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................11 2.1 Project Description.................................................................................................11 2.2 History of site..........................................................................................................11 3 SCOPE.............................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Rangelands, Western Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • IS20015 AC.Pdf
    Invertebrate Systematics, 2021, 35, 90–131 © CSIRO 2021 doi:10.1071/IS20015_AC Supplementary material Determining the position of Diomocoris, Micromimetus and Taylorilygus in the Lygus-complex based on molecular data and first records of Diomocoris and Micromimetus from Australia, including four new species (Insecta : Hemiptera : Miridae : Mirinae) Anna A. NamyatovaA,B,E, Michael D. SchwartzC and Gerasimos CassisD AAll-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, Podbelskogo Highway, 3, Pushkin, RU-196608 Saint Petersburg, Russia. BZoologial Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Embankment, 1, RU-199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia. CAgriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Canadian National Collection of Insects, 960 Carling Avenue, K.W. Neatby Building, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada. DEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2052, Australia. ECorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Page 1 of 46 Fig. S1. RAxML tree for the dataset with 124 taxa. Page 2 of 46 Fig. S2. RAxML tree for the dataset with 108 taxa. Page 3 of 46 Fig. S3. RAxML tree for the dataset with 105 taxa. Page 4 of 46 Full data on the specimens examined Diomocoris nebulosus (Poppius, 1914) AUSTRALIA: Australian Capital Territory: Tidbinbilla Nature Reserve, 25 km SW of Canberra, 35.46414°S 148.9083°E, 770 m, 11 Feb 1984, W. Middlekauff, Bursaria sp. (Pittosporaceae), 1♀ (AMNH_PBI 00242761) (CAS). New South Wales: 0.5 km SE of Lansdowne, 33.89949°S 150.97578°E, 12 Nov 1990, G. Williams, Acmena smithii (Poir.) Merr. & L.M. Perry (Myrtaceae), 1♂ (UNSW_ENT 00044752), 1♀ (UNSW_ENT 00044753) (AM). 1 km W of Sth Durras Northead Road, 35.66584°S 150.25846°E, 05 Oct 1985, G.
    [Show full text]
  • Canopy Arthropods and Herbivory on the Tasmanian Southern Beeches, Nothofagus Cunninghamii and Nothofagus Gunnii
    Canopy Arthropods and Herbivory on the Tasmanian Southern Beeches, Nothofagus cunninghamii and Nothofagus gunnii Volume 1 P. Jane Keble-Williams MB.ChB. (University of Sheffield, UK) Grad. Dip. Env. Stud. (University of Tasmania) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Geography and Environmental Studies University of Tasmania March 2012 ii DECLARATION This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of the my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. P.J. Keble-Williams Statement of Authority of Access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. iii iv ABSTRACT The Gondwanan relict tree genus Nothofagus has generated much research due to its biogeographical significance in understanding the biota of the Southern Temperate Zone. However, the southern temperate forest arthropod fauna, including that of Nothofagus, has received less attention than northern temperate forest and tropical rainforest. The extant Tasmanian Nothofagus canopy arthropod fauna has been considered depauparate. Yet with a palaeohistory of long persistence, high diversity and widespread distribution of the genus within Australia, the endemic Tasmanian Nothofagaceae – the evergreen Nothofagus cunninghamii and winter deciduous N. gunnii - could be expected to have accreted a large and diverse arthropod fauna, as have its sister Fagalean families in the northern hemisphere.
    [Show full text]
  • South Coast, Western Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • SWAFR - IBRA - Native Vascular Plant Taxa
    SWAFR - IBRA - Native Vascular Plant Taxa Paul Gioia, Science and Conservation Division, Department of Parks and Wildlife Report generated on 3/11/2015 3:49:33 PM This analysis uses a pro tem definition of the SWAFR that served to define the study area. It was based on the collection of IBRA bioregions most closely approximating the original definition of the Southwest Province by Beard (1980). Data for this report were derived from a snapshot taken from WAHERB on 18/05/2015 for Gioia & Hopper (2015) paper. Criteria for data extraction and analysis were: 1. All vascular plants 2. Species-rank names where the typical subspecies also existed were renamed to the typical subspecies to avoid counting duplicate taxa 3. Native vascular taxa with current names Note: 1. This report contains information generated from intersecting the supplied polygon layer LOCAL_SWFIBR with the point species occurrence layer WAHERB_FILT_NATIVE. 2. Endemism is calculated based on the records available to this analysis and is not necessarily authoritative. Regions reported on: Region Name Hectares SWAFR - IBRA 29,851,921.5 Species List By Region 1 2 3 1 2 3 NameID Species Cons End WA NameID Species Cons End WA 35 12247 Acacia anthochaera SWAFR - IBRA 36 3220 Acacia aphylla T Y 1 4889 Abutilon cryptopetalum 37 15466 Acacia applanata 2 4902 Abutilon oxycarpum 38 14049 Acacia aprica T Y Y 3 43020 Abutilon oxycarpum subsp. Prostrate (A.A. Y 39 37260 Acacia aptaneura Mitchell PRP 1266) 40 14050 Acacia arcuatilis P2 Y Y 4 16106 Acacia acanthaster Y 41 3221 Acacia argutifolia P4 Y 5 16159 Acacia acanthoclada subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List
    SWAFR - Hopper & Gioia (2004) - All Vascular Plant Taxa Paul Gioia, Science and Conservation Division, Department of Parks and Wildlife Report generated on 22/06/2016 11:17:17 AM This analysis uses the SWAFR boundary generated from a site classification analysis by Hopper & Gioia (2004). Data for this report were derived from a snapshot taken from WAHERB on 18/05/2015 for Gioia & Hopper (2016) paper. Criteria for data extraction and analysis were: 1. All vascular plants 2. Species-rank names where the typical subspecies also existed were renamed to the typical subspecies to avoid counting duplicate taxa 3. All vascular plant taxa with current names, including weeds Note: 1. This report contains information generated from intersecting the supplied polygon layer LOCAL_SWFHG04 with the point species occurrence layer WAHERB_FILT_ALL. 2. Endemism is calculated based on the records available to this analysis and is not necessarily authoritative. Regions reported on: Region Name Hectares SWAFR - Hopper & Gioia (2004) 29,954,654.4 1 2 3 1 2 3 NameID Species Cons End WA NameID Species Cons End WA 39 14049 Acacia aprica T Y Y SWAFR - Hopper & Gioia (2004) 40 37260 Acacia aptaneura 1 4889 Abutilon cryptopetalum 41 14050 Acacia arcuatilis P2 Y Y 2 19708 *Abutilon grandifolium Y 42 3221 Acacia argutifolia P4 Y 3 4902 Abutilon oxycarpum 43 14051 Acacia aristulata T Y Y 4 43020 Abutilon oxycarpum subsp. Prostrate (A.A. Y 44 12248 Acacia ascendens P2 Y Mitchell PRP 1266) 45 14052 Acacia asepala P2 Y 5 4903 *Abutilon theophrasti Y 46 3225 Acacia ashbyae 6 16106 Acacia acanthaster Y 47 15467 Acacia assimilis subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Arafura Resources Nl
    ARAFURA RESOURCES NL Environmental Survey of Landscape, Flora and Fauna of the Proposed Mt Porter Project Area (ML 23839) Prepared for Arafura Resources NL By Tom Reilly, Dr Bill Low, Dennis Matthews and Tom Newsome LOW ECOLOGICAL SERVICES PO Box 3130, Alice Springs, N.T. 0871 Phone: (08) 89 555 222 Fax: (08) 89 555 722 Email: [email protected] August 2005, Revised to November, 2006 Environmental Survey of Landscape, Flora and Fauna of the Proposed Mt Porter Project Area, April 2005 CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........................................................................................4 1.1 Existing Environment......................................................................................4 1.2 Conservation Value of the Proposed Mineral Lease (ML(A)23839).............5 2 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................7 2.1 Project Description.........................................................................................7 2.2 History of site..................................................................................................7 3 SCOPE.....................................................................................................................8 3.1 Landscape........................................................................................................8 3.2 Ecology............................................................................................................8 3.3 Limitations of the Survey................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • South Coast, Western Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Contributions from the United States National Herbarium Volume 50: 1 - 150 Smithsonian Plant Collections, Guyana: 1990 - 1991, Tim McDowell by Tom Hollowell Tim McDowell V.A. Funk Carol L. Kelloff and Doorjoohan Gopaul Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History Washington, DC 2004 ABSTRACT Hollowell, Tom, Tim McDowell, V.A. Funk, Carol L. Kelloff and Doorjoohan Gopaul. Smithsonian Plant Collections, Guyana: 1990 - 1991, Tim McDowell. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium, Volume 50: 150 pages (including 8 plates). Part I provides the collector’s notes on trips in chronological order. Part II lists collection localities, with collection number ranges, habitat descriptions, geographic coordinates, and assisting collectors. Part III consists of maps of Guyana showing collecting localites. Part IV lists collections in numerical order with identifications and authors. Part V lists collections ordered by determined name. KEY WORDS: Guyana, Botanical Collecting, Nomenclature DATE OF PUBLICATION: December 2004 Cover Design by Alice Tangerini. Illustrations by Cathy Pasquale, courtesy of the Department of Botany, Smithsonian Institution. Front cover: Lampadaria rupestris Feuillet & L.E. Skog (Gesneriaceae); back cover: Paradrymonia barbata Feuillet & L.E. Skog (Gesneriaceae), both from Feuillet, C. and L.E. Skog. 2002 (2003). Novae Gesneriaceae Neotropicarum XII. New species of Gesneriaceae from the Guianas. Brittonia 54 (4): 352-361. Front piece (p. 4) Justicia mcdowellii Wassh. (Acanthaceae), from Wasshausen, D.C. 2002. New species of Justicia (Acanthaceae) from the Guianas. Brittonia, 54(4): 286–297. All photographs by Tim McDowell, except as noted, courtesy of the Smithsonian Institution’s Biological Diversity of the Guiana Shield Program. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium (ISSN 0097-1618) Department of Botany, MRC 166, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, 20013-7012, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • SWAFR - Hopper & Gioia (2004) - Native Vascular Plant Taxa Paul Gioia, Science and Conservation Division, Department of Parks and Wildlife
    SWAFR - Hopper & Gioia (2004) - Native Vascular Plant Taxa Paul Gioia, Science and Conservation Division, Department of Parks and Wildlife Report generated on 22/06/2016 11:30:52 AM This analysis uses the SWAFR boundary generated from a site classification analysis by Hopper & Gioia (2004). Data for this report were derived from a snapshot taken from WAHERB on 18/05/2015 for Gioia & Hopper (2016) paper. Criteria for data extraction and analysis were: 1. All vascular plants 2. Species-rank names where the typical subspecies also existed were renamed to the typical subspecies to avoid counting duplicate taxa 3. Native vascular taxa with current names Note: 1. This report contains information generated from intersecting the supplied polygon layer LOCAL_SWFHG04 with the point species occurrence layer WAHERB_FILT_NATIVE. 2. Endemism is calculated based on the records available to this analysis and is not necessarily authoritative. Regions reported on: Region Name Hectares SWAFR - Hopper & Gioia (2004) 29,954,654.4 1 2 3 1 2 3 NameID Species Cons End WA NameID Species Cons End WA 39 14050 Acacia arcuatilis P2 Y Y SWAFR - Hopper & Gioia (2004) 40 3221 Acacia argutifolia P4 Y 1 4889 Abutilon cryptopetalum 41 14051 Acacia aristulata T Y Y 2 4902 Abutilon oxycarpum 42 12248 Acacia ascendens P2 Y 3 43020 Abutilon oxycarpum subsp. Prostrate (A.A. Y 43 14052 Acacia asepala P2 Y Mitchell PRP 1266) 44 3225 Acacia ashbyae 4 16106 Acacia acanthaster Y 45 15467 Acacia assimilis subsp. assimilis Y 5 16159 Acacia acanthoclada subsp. acanthoclada Y 46 15468 Acacia assimilis subsp. atroviridis Y 6 14613 Acacia acanthoclada subsp.
    [Show full text]