DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 72, No. 2/Thursday, January 4, 2007/Rules

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 2 / Thursday, January 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 287 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. ADDRESSES: The final BFEs for each environmental impact assessment has 83.100, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’) community are available for inspection not been prepared. Dated: December 22, 2006. at the office of the Chief Executive Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood David I. Maurstad, Officer of each community. The elevation determinations are not within Director, Mitigation Division, Federal respective addresses are listed in the the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Emergency Management Agency, Department table below. Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory of Homeland Security. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: flexibility analysis is not required. [FR Doc. E6–22521 Filed 1–3–07; 8:45 am] William R. Blanton, Jr., Engineering Regulatory Classification. This final BILLING CODE 9110–12–P Management Section, Mitigation rule is not a significant regulatory action Division, Federal Emergency under the criteria of section 3(f) of Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Executive Order 12866 of September 30, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–3151. 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, SECURITY SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 58 FR 51735. Federal Emergency Management Agency Federal Emergency Management Executive Order 13132, Federalism. (FEMA) makes the final determinations Agency This final rule involves no policies that listed below for the modified BFEs for have federalism implications under each community listed. These modified 44 CFR Part 67 Executive Order 13132. elevations have been published in Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Final Flood Elevation Determinations newspapers of local circulation and ninety (90) days have elapsed since that Reform. This final rule meets the AGENCY: Federal Emergency publication. The Mitigation Division applicable standards of Executive Order Management Agency, DHS. Director of FEMA has resolved any 12988. ACTION: Final rule. appeals resulting from this notification. List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67 This final rule is issued in accordance SUMMARY: Base (1% annual chance) with section 110 of the Flood Disaster Administrative practice and Flood Elevations (BFEs) and modified Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting BFEs are made final for the and 44 CFR part 67. FEMA has and recordkeeping requirements. communities listed below. The BFEs developed criteria for floodplain I and modified BFEs are the basis for the Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is management in floodprone areas in amended as follows: floodplain management measures that accordance with 44 CFR part 60. each community is required either to Interested lessees and owners of real PART 67—[AMENDED] adopt or to show evidence of being property are encouraged to review the already in effect in order to qualify or proof Flood Insurance Study and FIRM I 1. The authority citation for part 67 remain qualified for participation in the available at the address cited below for continues to read as follows: National Flood Insurance Program each community. The BFEs and (NFIP). Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; modified BFEs are made final in the Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR, DATES: The date of issuance of the Flood communities listed below. Elevations at 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) showing selected locations in each community 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376. BFEs and modified BFEs for each are shown. community. This date may be obtained National Environmental Policy Act. § 67.11 [Amended] by contacting the office where the maps This final rule is categorically excluded I 2. The tables published under the are available for inspection as indicated from the requirements of 44 CFR part authority of § 67.11 are amended as on the table below. 10, Environmental Consideration. An follows: * Elevation in feet (NGVD) + Elevation in feet Flooding source(s) Location of referenced elevation (NAVD) Communities affected # Depth in feet above ground Modified Person County, North Carolina and Incorporated Areas Docket No.: FEMA–D–7570,D–7582, and FEMA–D–7668 Alderidge Creek ........................ At the upstream side of Berry Road .......................................... +527 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). Approximately 0.7 mile upstream of Satterfield Road ............... +536 Alderidge Creek Tributary ......... At the confluence with Alderidge Creek .................................... +530 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). Approximately 0.3 mile upstream of the confluence with +535 Alderidge Creek. Big Blue Wing Creek ................ Approximately 1,300 feet downstream of High View Church +403 Person County (Unincor- Road (State Route 1509). porated Areas). Approximately 0.7 mile upstream of Tatum Road (State Route +506 1511). Big Blue Wing Tributary 1 ........ Approximately 2,000 feet downstream of Wind Dancer Lane ... +399 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:35 Jan 04, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\04JAR1.SGM 04JAR1 pwalker on PROD1PC65 with RULES 288 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 2 / Thursday, January 4, 2007 / Rules and Regulations * Elevation in feet (NGVD) + Elevation in feet Flooding source(s) Location of referenced elevation (NAVD) Communities affected # Depth in feet above ground Modified Approximately 0.4 mile upstream of Epps-Martin Road (State +450 Route 1506). Bowes Branch ........................... At the Virginia/North Carolina State boundary .......................... +361 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). Approximately 1,440 feet upstream of Virginia/North Carolina +368 State boundary. Bredlov Creek ........................... At the confluence with Big Blue Wing Creek ............................ +407 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). Approximately 1,400 feet upstream of the confluence with Big +413 Blue Wing Creek. Broachs Mill Creek ................... At the confluence with South Hyco Creek ................................. +433 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). Approximately 0.9 mile upstream of Hester’s Store Road +515 (State Route 1162). Bushy Fork Creek ..................... Approximately 600 feet downstream of Charlie Long Road ..... +571 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). Approximately 1.1 miles upstream of Bradsher Road ............... +616 Bushy Fork Creek Tributary ..... At the confluence with Bushy Fork Creek ................................. +606 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). Approximately 0.38 mile upstream of the confluence with +622 Bushy Fork Creek. Byrds Creek .............................. Approximately 850 feet upstream of the confluence with South +546 Person County (Unincor- Flat River. porated Areas). Approximately 1.0 mile upstream of the confluence with South +558 Flat River. Castle Creek ............................. At the confluence with Hyco River ............................................ +360 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). Approximately 790 feet downstream of Shiloh Church Road +394 (State Route 1322). Cattail Branch ........................... At the confluence with Big Blue Wing Creek ............................ +428 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). Approximately 1,750 feet upstream of the confluence with Big +437 Blue Wing Creek. Cobbs Creek ............................. Approximately 0.8 mile upstream of the confluence with Hyco +414 Person County (Unincor- Lake. porated Areas). At the Person/Caswell County boundary ................................... +510 Cub Creek Tributary 1 .............. At the Person/Granville County boundary ................................. +477 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). Approximately 0.6 mile upstream of the confluence of Cub +499 Creek Tributary 2. Cub Creek Tributary 2 .............. At the confluence with Cub Creek Tributary 1 .......................... +490 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). Approximately 1,500 feet upstream of the confluence with Cub +496 Creek Tributary 1. Deep Creek ............................... At the Person/Durham County boundary .................................. +419 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). Approximately 1.0 mile upstream of Mollie Moonie Road ......... +561 Deep Creek Tributary ............... At the confluence with Deep Creek ........................................... +477 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). Approximately 2,000 feet upstream of the confluence with +485 Deep Creek. Deep Creek Tributary 2 ............ At the confluence with Deep Creek ........................................... +516 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). Approximately 1,000 feet upstream of the confluence with +520 Deep Creek. Dial Creek ................................. At the Person/Durham County boundary .................................. +515 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). Approximately 400 feet upstream of the Person/Durham +519 County boundary. Flat River Tributary 5 ................ At the confluence with Flat River ............................................... +474 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). At the Person/Durham County boundary .................................. +496 Ghents Creek ............................ At the confluence with Hyco River ............................................ +367 Person County (Unincor- porated Areas). Approximately 1,400 feet upstream of Edwin Robertson Road +387 (State Route 1322). VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:35
Recommended publications
  • Docket # 2018-318-E - Page 11 of 97

    Docket # 2018-318-E - Page 11 of 97

    EXHIBIT DJW - 5.0 ELECTRONICALLY Page 1 of 18 Date: May 14, 2015 Document: EXHIBIT 2 – AMENDED STIPULATIONS – PLEA AGREEMENT Cases: US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NUMBERS 5:15-CR-67-H-2 AND 5:15-CR-68- H-2 FILED Findings: - 2019 1. Dan River Steam Station (pages 43 - 48) – The Court found Defendants guilty and Defendants plead guilty to four counts (sets of violations) at Dan River. March a. Count One is that the company violated the Clean Water Act for the unpermitted discharge through the 48-inch stormwater so and the Defendant aided and abetted another 4 in doing so. Furthermore, the Court found that the Defendant acted negligently in doing 4:55 so. b. Count Two is that Defendant violated the CWA by not maintaining the 48-inch storm PM water pipe which constituted a violation of its NPDES permit which requires that the - permittee to properly maintain its equipment. Furthermore, the Court found that the SCPSC Defendant acted negligently in doing so and that the Defendant aided and abetted another in doing so. c. Count Three is that Defendant violated the CWA for the unpermitted discharge through - the 36-inch stormwater pipe at Dan River of coal ash and coal ash wastewater from a Docket point source into a water of the US. Furthermore, the Court found that the Defendant acted negligently in doing so and that the Defendant aided and abetted another in doing # so. 2018-318-E d. Count Four is that Defendant violated the CWA by not maintaining the 36-inch storm water pipe which constituted a violation of its NPDES permit which requires that the permittee to properly maintain its equipment.
  • Link to Duke Joint Factual Statement

    Link to Duke Joint Factual Statement

    UNITED STAT8S DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No . 5 : 15-CR-62-H No. 5 : 15-CR-67-H No. 5 : 15-CR-68-H UNITED STATES OF AMSRICA v. JOINT FACTUAL STATEMENT DUKE ENERGY BUSINESS SERVICES LLC DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS , LLC DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS , INC . I . INTRODUCTION Defendants Duke Energy Business Services LLC (" DUKE ENERGY BUSINESS SERVICES"), Duke Energy Carol inas, LLC (" DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS") , and Duke Energy Progress, Inc. ("DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS") , (collectively referred to as " Defendants") and the United States of America, by and through t he United States Attorneys for the Eastern District of North Carolina, the Middle Distri ct of North Carolina and the Western District of North Carolina and the Environmental Crimes Section of the United States Department of Justice (collectively referred to herein as " the United States" or "the government" ) , hereby agree that this Joint Factual Statement is a true and accurate statement of the Defendants ' crimi nal conduct a nd that it provides a sufficient basis for the Defendants ' pleas of guilty to the following charging documents and the terms of the Plea Agreements : United States v. Duke Energy Business Services, LLC , and Duke Energy Progress, Inc ., No. 5 : 15-CR-62-H; United States v . Duke Energy Business Services, LLC , Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC , and Duke Energy Progress, Inc., No . 5 : 15-CR-67-Il; and United States v . Duke Energy Business Services, LLC , Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC , and Duke Energy Progress, Inc. , No . 5 : 15-CR-68-H . The charges from the Middle District of North Carolina and the Wes tern District of North Carolina have been transferred to the Eastern District of North Carolina for purposes o f plea pursuant to Fed.
  • 02067820 TALBOTT and TOWNES RESERVOIRS These Two Reservoirs on the Dan River Are Operated As a Unit for Storage of Water for Pinnacles Hydroelectric Plant

    02067820 TALBOTT and TOWNES RESERVOIRS These Two Reservoirs on the Dan River Are Operated As a Unit for Storage of Water for Pinnacles Hydroelectric Plant

    SOUTH ATLANTIC SLOPE BASIN 692 LAKES AND RESERVOIRS IN SOUTH ATLANTIC SLOPE BASIN 02067800; 02067820 TALBOTT AND TOWNES RESERVOIRS These two reservoirs on the Dan River are operated as a unit for storage of water for Pinnacles hydroelectric plant. TALBOTT DAM LOCATION.--Lat 36°40'36", long 80°23'51", Patrick County, Va, Hydrologic Unit 03010103, 4.5 mi northeast of Kibler. DRAINAGE AREA.--20.2 mi2. TOWNES DAM LOCATION.--Lat 36°41'11", long 80°25'49", Patrick County, Va, Hydrologic Unit 03010103, 4 mi north of Kibler. DRAINAGE AREA.--32.9 mi2. PERIOD OF RECORD.--February 1939 to December 1945 and January 1948 to September 1960 (combined monthend contents only pub- lished in WSP 1723), October 1960 to current year. REMARKS.--Total capacity of Talbott Reservoir is 350,000,000 ft3 and Townes Reservoir is 60,000,000 ft3. Filling was started in Talbott Reservoir Feb. 13, 1939, and in Townes Reservoir several months earlier. Records furnished by city of Danville, Virginia. (See station 02068500.) 02077280 HYCO LAKE LOCATION.--Lat 36°30'28", long 79°02'48", Person County, Hydrologic Unit 03010104, at outlet control structure 0.4 mi northwest of dam on Hyco River, 1.1 mi southwest of McGehees Mill, and 8 mi northwest of Roxboro. DRAINAGE AREA.--189 mi2. PERIOD OF RECORD.--October 1964 to current year. Prior to October 1970, published as "Roxboro Steam-Electric Generating Plant Lake." GAGE.--Water-stage recorder and tape gage. Prior to Feb. 11, 1965, staff gage at upstream end of outlet control structure. Datum of gage is 399.79 ft above sea level (levels by Carolina Power and Light Co.).
  • Historic Architectural Resources Survey of Halifax County, Virginia

    Historic Architectural Resources Survey of Halifax County, Virginia

    HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF HALIFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA Prepared by: MAAR Associates, Inc. Hill Studio, P.C. P.O. Box 655 120 West Campbell Avenue Newark, DE 19715 Roanoke, Virginia 540-342-5263 May 2004 July 2008 With contributions by: Ronald A. Thomas, M.A., Project Manager, Principal Investigator and Kim Chen Prepared for: Virginia Department Halifax County of Historic Resources 134 South Main Street 2801 Kensington Avenue Halifax, Virginia Richmond, Virginia 23221 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ i Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................... ii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Purpose and Survey Goals .................................................................................. 1 1.2 Survey Coverage and Study Area ................................................................................... 1 1.3 Survey Methodology ....................................................................................................... 5 1.3.1 Background Research ............................................................................................. 5 1.3.2 On-Site Survey ........................................................................................................ 5
  • 15A Ncac 02B .0313 Roanoke River Basin

    15A Ncac 02B .0313 Roanoke River Basin

    15A NCAC 02B .0313 ROANOKE RIVER BASIN (a) Classifications assigned to the waters within the Roanoke River Basin are set forth in the Roanoke River Basin Classification Schedule, which may be inspected at the following places: (1) the Internet at https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-planning/classification- standards/river-basin-classification; and (2) the following offices of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality: (A) Raleigh Regional Office 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, Carolina; (B) Washington Regional Office 943 Washington Square Mall Washington, Carolina; (C) Winston-Salem Regional Office 450 West Hanes Mill Road North Carolina; and (D) Division of Water Resources Regional Office 512 North Salisbury Street Raleigh, North Carolina. (b) Unnamed streams entering Virginia are classified "C", except that all backwaters of John H. Kerr Reservoir and the North Carolina portion of streams tributary thereto not otherwise named or described shall carry the classification "B," and all backwaters of Lake Gaston and the North Carolina portion of streams tributary thereto not otherwise named or described shall carry the classification "C and B". (c) The Roanoke River Basin Classification Schedule was amended effective: (1) May 18, 1977; (2) July 9, 1978; (3) July 18, 1979; (4) July 13, 1980; (5) March 1, 1983; (6) August 1, 1985; (7) February 1, 1986. (d) The Roanoke River Basin Classification Schedule was amended effective July 1, 1991 with the reclassification of Hyco Lake (Index No. 22-58) from Class C to Class B. (e) The Roanoke River Basin Classification Schedule was amended effective August 3, 1992 with the reclassification of all water supply waters (waters with a primary classification of WS-I, WS-II or WS-III).
  • Person Class: %

    Person Class: %

    Report Date: 09/01/07 North Carolina Waterbodies Listed by County Records Found: 59 Search Parameters: Note: Waterbodies are listed in more than one county if they cross county lines. County: Person Class: % No Records Returned! SpDes: % Name: % Index#: % Name of Stream Description Curr. Class Date Basin Stream Index # Person County Winns Creek From source to North B 03/01/77 Roanoke 22-57 Carolina-Virginia State Line Brandon Creek From source to North B 03/01/77 Roanoke 22-57-1 Carolina-Virginia State Line Hyco River, From source in Hyco WS-V,B 04/01/99 Roanoke 22-58-(0.5) including Hyco Lake to dam of Hyco Lake below Lake, including elevation 410 tributary arms below elevation 410 Hyco River From dam of Hyco Lake C 07/17/79 Roanoke 22-58-(9.5) to North Carolina-Virginia State Line, includding all portions in North Carolina Ghent Creek From source to Hyco C 09/01/74 Roanoke 22-58-10 River Powells Creek From North C 09/01/74 Roanoke 22-58-11 Carolina-Virginia State Line to Hyco River Storys Creek From a point 0.9 mile WS-II;HQW,CA 08/03/92 Roanoke 22-58-12-(1.5) [Roxboro City downstream of N.C. Lake (Lake Issac Hwy. 57 to Roxboro Walton)] City Lake Dam Storys Creek From source to a point WS-II;HQW 08/03/92 Roanoke 22-58-12-(1) 0.9 mile downstream of N.C. Hwy. 57 Storys Creek From Roxboro City Lake B 09/01/57 Roanoke 22-58-12-(4) (Chub Lake) Dam to dam at Chub Lake Storys Creek From dam at Chub Lake C 07/01/73 Roanoke 22-58-12-(5) to Hyco River Satterfield Creek From source to a point WS-II;HQW 08/03/92 Roanoke 22-58-12-2-(1) 0.5 mile downstream of N.C.
  • State Water Control Board Page 1 of 15 9 Vac 25-720 Water Quality Management Planning Regulation15 9 Vac 25-720-80

    State Water Control Board Page 1 of 15 9 Vac 25-720 Water Quality Management Planning Regulation15 9 Vac 25-720-80

    STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD PAGE 1 OF 15 9 VAC 25-720 WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING REGULATION15 9 VAC 25-720-80. Roanoke River Basin. A. Total maximum Daily Load (TMDLs). B. Stream segment classifications, effluent limitations including water quality based effluent limitations, and waste load allocations. B. Non - TMDL Waste Load Allocations. STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD PAGE 2 OF 15 9 VAC 25-720 WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING REGULATION15 TABLE B1 - STREAM SEGMENT CLASSIFICATION Classification Segment description WQMA IV E All tributaries to the Roanoke River not previously classified in the WQMA. WQMA V E Roanoke River and all tributaries in this WQMA. WQMA VI WQ Ash Camp Creek. EL Twittys Creek. E Roanoke Creek to include all tributaries not previously classified in the WQMA. WQMA VII WQ Banister River from /confluence of Polecat Creek to confluence of Dan and Banister Rivers (River only). EL Dan River from confluence Miry Creek to backwaters of Kerr Reservoir (River only). WQ Kerr Reservoir. WQ Little Bluestone Creek. WQ Butcher Creek WQ Flat Creek. E All tributaries to Kerr Reservoir, Dan River and Banister River not previously classified in this WQMA. E Roanoke River from confluence Clover Creek to headwaters of Kerr Reservoir. E All tributaries to the Roanoke River in this WQMA not previously classified. WQMA VIII E Hyco River from the NC-VA, State Line to its confluence with the Dan River to include all tributaries. WQMA IX E Banister River through this WQMA EL Georges Creek. EL Cherrystone Creek. E All tributaries to the Banister River not previously classified in this WQMA.
  • Roxboro DENR Drinking Water Well Survey.Pdf

    Roxboro DENR Drinking Water Well Survey.Pdf

    Drinking Water Well Survey and Receptor Survey September 2014 Roxboro Steam Electric Plant – Semora, NC SynTerra TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background ...................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Plant and Ash Basins Description ........................................................................... 2 2.2 Description of Surrounding Properties .................................................................. 2 3.0 Site Geology and Hydrogeology .................................................................................. 3 3.1 Generalized Site Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model ............................................ 3 3.2 Site Geology/Hydrogeology ..................................................................................... 3 3.3 Hydrogeologic Information for Flow Direction Determination ......................... 4 3.4 Groundwater Flow Direction Determination Results .......................................... 5 4.0 Drinking Water Well Survey Activities and Findings ............................................ 6 4.1 State Records Review ................................................................................................ 6 4.2 Federal/Other Records Review ................................................................................ 6 4.3 County and Utility Department
  • Basis for the Defendants'leas of Guilty to the Following Charging Documents and the Terms of the Plea Agreements: EXHIBIT DJW - 5.2.1 ELECTRONICALLY Page 2 of 79

    Basis for the Defendants'leas of Guilty to the Following Charging Documents and the Terms of the Plea Agreements: EXHIBIT DJW - 5.2.1 ELECTRONICALLY Page 2 of 79

    EXHIBIT DJW - 5.2.1 ELECTRONICALLY Page 1 of 79 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ILE0 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA FILED WESTERN DIVISION MA) i 4 No. 5:15-CR-62-H ALIEaglg ar ~ at mr eros - No. 5:15-CR-67-H at p0' RK No. 5:15-CR-6B-H 2019 UN1TED STATES OF AMERICA ) March ) ) JOINT FACTUAL STATEMENT ) 4 5:21 DUKE ENERGY BUSINESS SERVICES LLC ) DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC ) DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC. ) PM - SCPSC I . INTRODUCTION - Docket Defendants Duke Energy Business Services LLC ("DUKE ENERGY BUSINESS SERVICES" ), Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC ("DUKE ENERGY # CAROLINAS"), and Duke Energy Progress, Inc. ("DUKE ENERGY 2018-318-E PROGRESS" ), (collectively referred to as "Defendants" ) and the United States of America, by and through the United States - Attorneys for the Eastern District of North Carolina, the Middle Page District of North Carolina and the Western District of North 1 of Carolina and the Environmental Crimes Section of the United 121 States Department of Justice (collectively referred to herein as "the United States" or "the government"), hereby agree that this Joint Factual Statement is a true and accurate statement of the Defendants'riminal conduct and that it provides a sufficient basis for the Defendants'leas of guilty to the following charging documents and the terms of the Plea Agreements: EXHIBIT DJW - 5.2.1 ELECTRONICALLY Page 2 of 79 United States v. Duke Ener Business Services, LLC, and Duke Ener Pro ress, Inc., No. 5:15-CR-62-H; FILED United States v. Duke Ener Business Services, LLC, Duke Ener Carolinas, LLC, and Duke Ener Pro ress Inc., - No.
  • Basinwide Assessment Report Roanoke River Basin

    Basinwide Assessment Report Roanoke River Basin

    BASINWIDE ASSESSMENT REPORT ROANOKE RIVER BASIN NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Section April 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables...........................................................................................................................................2 List of Figures..........................................................................................................................................2 Overview .................................................................................................................................................5 Roanoke River Subbasin 01 ...................................................................................................................7 Description .................................................................................................................................7 Overview of Water Quality .........................................................................................................8 River and Stream Assessment ..................................................................................................9 Roanoke River Subbasin 02 .................................................................................................................16 Description ...............................................................................................................................16 Overview of Water Quality .......................................................................................................17
  • Of Pittsylvania and Halifax Counties

    Of Pittsylvania and Halifax Counties

    COMMON\VEALTH OF VI RGI N IA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY AND GROI.JND.VVATER RESOURCES OF PITTSYLVANIA AND HALIFAX COUNTIES HARRY E. LEGRAND BULLETIN 75 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jomes L. Cclver Commissioner of Minerol Resources snd Stote Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGI N IA I 960 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGIN IA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF PITTSYLVANIA AND HALIFAX COUNTIES HARRY E. LEGRAND BULLETIN 75 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jomes L. Colver Commissioner of Minerol Resources ond Stote Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 1960 CourvroNwrarrH oF VIRGTNIA DnpanrurNr op PuncHasrs lNo Supprv RTcHMoND 1960 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ManvlN M. SurHrnLAND, Acting Director BOARD Vtcron \7. Srnwanr, Petersbvg, Chairman G. ArvtN MassrNsunc, Hampton, Vice Chairman A. PruNrBT BErnNE, Orange C. S. CanrBn, Bristol ANonnw A. Fanrry, Danville ITonnrrNctow FaurKNER, Glasgow SyoNry F. Sivrlrt, Roanoke EnwrN H. Sfnr, Richmond S7lnrau P. $Zooornv. Norfolk CONTENTS PAGE Abstract 1 Introduction Geography Area and population I Physical features 5 Climate 7 Geology General statement I General discussion of rock characteristics Sedimentary rocks of Triassic age . 10 Leatherwood granite . ......., 11 Mica schist 1l Mica schist and granite 12 Hornblende gneiss . 12 Melrose granite . Ij Mixed gneisses ..... ........ 13 Granite gneiss . 14 Gabbro 1,6 Slates and related volcanic tocks of the Virgilina district . - -. .. 16 Ground water Occurrence and movement of ground water . 1g Significanceof thewatertable... ........ 2I Springs ........ 22 Quality of ground water. 23 Flood-plain deposits 25 Types of wells. 26 Yield of wells Introduction 29 ITater levels and the effect of pumping.
  • Reconnaissance Geologic Map of the Halifax, Scottsburg, Nathalie, and Conner Lake 7.5-Minute Quadrangles, Halifax and Charlotte Counties, Virginia

    Reconnaissance Geologic Map of the Halifax, Scottsburg, Nathalie, and Conner Lake 7.5-Minute Quadrangles, Halifax and Charlotte Counties, Virginia

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Reconnaissance geologic map of the Halifax, Scottsburg, Nathalie, and Conner Lake 7.5-minute quadrangles, Halifax and Charlotte Counties, Virginia By Arthur E. Nelson and Frances J. Nelson Open File Report 97-707 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards nor with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. INTRODUCTION A l:48,000-scale geologic map was made of the Halifax, Scottsburg, Nathalie, and Conner Lake 7.5-minute quadrangles, which are located in the Piedmont physiographic province, south- central Virginia. The map area lies mainly in Halifax County, and it includes a small area of Charlotte County on the north side of the Roanoke River. Topographic relief ranges from about 315 feet above sea level in the Roanoke River valley to 657 feet near Acorn, which is about 3 miles northwest of Nathalie. Principal drainages are the easterly flowing Roanoke River, the southeasterly flowing Banister River, and their tributaries. The geologic mapping was a part of a larger project to map the geology of the South Boston 30 X 60-minute quadrangle at 1:100,000 scale. Generally the report area is underlain by highly weathered rocks with deep weathering profiles and sparse fresh rock exposure. Previously workers have reported on various aspects of the geology within and near the study area (Laney, 1917; King, 1955; Espenshade and Potter, 1960; Tobisch and Glover, 1969, 1971; Glover and Sinha, 1973; Butler, 1980; Henika, 1977, 1980; Marr, 1980; Kreisa, 1980; Gates and others, 1986; Baird, 1991; Horton and Zullo, 1991; Horton and others, 1993; Virginia Division of Mineral Resources, 1993; Hibbard, 1993; Nelson, 1993; Wortman and others, 1995; Peper and others, 1996; Bradley, 1996; Ozdogan and others, 1997; Baird and Glover, 1997).