Beating the Bushes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Beating the Bushes Beating the Bushes: All Politics, All The Time January 09, 2008 The Swift Boating of Barak Obama While hosting a dinner party at our home the other night, one of our guests -- a 30ish attorney with an MBA -- asked me out of the blue: "So what do you think about Osama?" Catching the devilish glint in his eye, and knowing of his penchant for being a contrarian, I quickly gleaned that he was referring not to Osama bin Laden, but rather to Barak Obama. Initially, I decided to play dumb: "I think he is a mass murderer masquerading as a Muslim Messiah." From the look on his face, I could tell he was disappointed that I hadn't taken the bait. "No, I'm talking about Osama, the guy running for president," he said somewhat churlishly. "First of all," I said, a bit heatedly, "his name is SENATOR Barak Hussein OBAMA, not OSAMA, and secondly, please don't tell me you're one of those unfortunate souls who've fallen for this barrel of b.s." "All I know is what I hear," he said, "and from what I've heard, this guy's bad news." The conversation didn't get much better. The only saving grace was that I knew he was living up to his contrarian self, and probably didn't really believe what he was saying. He was likely just trying to get a rise out of me. Nonetheless, it was terribly unsettling. The very next morning, I received an email from my assistant and man- of-all-work Art. The email title was "Obama Misinformation?" It turned out to be an email that a friend had forwarded to him containing the normal rants and baseless charges against Senator Obama, such as 1 He is the son of a radical Muslim His middle name is Muhammad His mother was an atheist He was indoctrinated at a Wahabi midrasa in Indonesia He refuses to stand during the National Anthem He took his senatorial oath of office on a copy of the Koran His church -- Trinity Church of Christ --is both racist and anti- American Not wishing to either rehash or dignify these phony charges with any words of defense, I merely sent Art several Internet links. For anyone interested in debunking these baseless myths, please go to www.snopes.com put in the word "Obama," and follow the many links that will appear. They provide the truth about Senator Obama . Now, the main issue here is why the Internet is being flooded with all these mendacious emails; why newspapers and so-called political Blogs are continuing the frontal assault -- call it "Swift Boating" -- of a United States Senator running for President of the United States. In a word: racism. It is an undeniable fact of political life that the front-runners are always subjected to far more scrutiny than the also-rans. And, for the 120 hours between his victory in Iowa and his second-place finish in New Hampshire, Barak Obama was the front-runner. Of course, in the seesaw battle betwixt Senators Clinton, Obama and Edwards, that could all change once they get to Nevada or South Carolina, not to mention Florida, California or New York. For the moment, however, Barak Obama is the one running around with a bulls-eye on his back. Truth to tell, from everything I have read, from my encounters and conversations with Obama's people, he's is pretty much what he seems to be: a classy, earnest, incredibly articulate, passionate man who, more than most, has the talent to both inspire and uplift. So what's the problem? 2 Some claim that the main drawback with Barak Obama comes in the area of experience; he's only been a senator for two years. [It should be noted here, by the way, that sitting senators rarely win the presidency. The last two were JFK in 1960 and Warren G. Harding in 1920]. I for one think this issue of experience is, frankly, overblown. 138 years ago, America elected as president, a man who had served but a single term in the House of Representatives -- a full 14 years before his election. That man was Abraham Lincoln, who went on to become -- unquestionably -- this nation's greatest president. To my way of thinking, a president does not have to be a genius in all areas of governance. Rather, he or she needs vision, common sense, and the ability to bring the so-called "best and brightest" into their administration. They also have to be articulate and passionate enough to inspire, instruct and uplift. This world of nonsense about Senator Obama's so-called "Muslim indoctrination" is just that -- stuff and nonsense. Those who are pushing and re-pushing the issue are, in my estimation, using the "M word" where two generations ago, they would have likely been using the "N word." Yes, the underpinning of all these false reports is nothing more, nothing less than bad old-fashioned American racism. That people are so brazen, so deluded and base as to accuse Senator Obama of being a Muslim "Manchurian Candidate" is odious. That people are willing to accept these charges as being true is beyond comprehension. Then again, Grandpa Doc used to say "the masses are asses." As practiced in America, politics is a full contact, no-holds-barred sport, where the ends -- victory -- generally justify the means. It is one thing to vet a candidate's record in the hope of finding inconsistency, a bone- headed vote or some youthful indiscretion. It is another to turn a candidate into America's worst fear: a ticking time bomb sent to destroy the country of his birth. I for one am as yet undecided on just who my candidate will be. I think the Democrats have fielded one of the most attractive, talented fields in years. Indeed, I could proudly cast a vote for Clinton, Edwards, Obama or Richardson without a moment's hesitation in the general election. That 3 the Democrats offer this nation the possibility of electing the first woman, African American or Hispanic president says volumes about both the party and the country. But to fall victim to the tenebrous shadows of 19th or 20th century racism is indeed, to fall from grace. America should be better than that . ©2008 Kurt F. Stone January 09, 2008 in The 2008 Campaign | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0) 4 Beating the Bushes: All Politics, All The Time January 16, 2008 A Lesson From Sinai As this article is being written, Air Force One is touching down at Andrews Air Force Base; President Bush's eight-day tour of the Middle East has come to an end. From Jerusalem and Ramallah to Bahrain, Kuwait, the UAR, Saudi Arabia and Egypt, Mr. Bush scurried about pushing his dream of peace between Israel and the Palestinians, seeking allies in his war of wits with Iran, and talking up the superiority of democracy over any other form of government. He also urged Saudi Arabia and other OPEC nations to consider the strain that high oil prices are having on the U.S. economy. The Saudi response to heartfelt suggestion that they up oil production was essentially "Go pound sand." Undaunted, the Bush administration notified Congress of its intention to sell the Saudis $120 million in precision-guided bombs. Yes siree, that's showin' them Ayrabs! From articles appearing in the international Arab press, it would seem that the Muslim-in-the-street was less than overwhelmed by the American president's visit. Only in Israel -- where his popularity ratings are just a tad higher than they are here at home -- did he meet with anything even approaching approbation. One cannot help but wonder how well President Bush understands the Middle East. To aver that the Israelis and Palestinians will find rapprochement in their decades-old struggle by the end of his presidency is -- sorry to say -- phantasmagoric at best, delusional at worst. Why? For the past five years or so, President Bush has made it abundantly clear that his administration's suggested cure to what ails the Middle East is democracy. Well, I'm here to tell you that as idealistic and admirable as that may be on paper, it is anything but in reality. 1 To understand this, permit me to don my yarmulke and write not as a political op-ed blogger who happens to be an ordained rabbi, but as an ordained rabbi who happens to be a political op-ed blogger. Everyone, I am reasonably certain, is familiar with the Biblical story of the Exodus -- even if its the Cecil B. De Mille version. We should all remember how once freed from 400 years of Egyptian slavery, the Israelites Crossed the Red Sea [actually yam suf, the "Sea of Reeds"], Received the Ten Commandments, Dined on manna, Moaned, groaned and kvetched, Built the Golden Calf, Mistrusted both God and Moses, Sent 12 spies [or scouts] out to check out the land of Canaan, and Eventually, after 40 long and grueling years, entered the Promised Land. For the rabbis of old, one of the things that fascinated them most was why all this took 40 years; why God chose not to lead them on a straight path that would have taken only 6 or 7 weeks. Direct textual evidence provides one answer: God was punishing the former slaves for their lack of trust, their effrontery and their utter faithlessness. Rabbinic commentary, however, provides a far more telling answer. One will recall that with the exception of Joshua bin Nun of the tribe of Ephraim and Caleb ben Jephunneh [Y'funeh] of the tribe of Judah, all those who crossed over into Canaan were born en route.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4 the Right-Wing Media Enablers of Anti-Islam Propaganda
    Chapter 4 The right-wing media enablers of anti-Islam propaganda Spreading anti-Muslim hate in America depends on a well-developed right-wing media echo chamber to amplify a few marginal voices. The think tank misinforma- tion experts and grassroots and religious-right organizations profiled in this report boast a symbiotic relationship with a loosely aligned, ideologically-akin group of right-wing blogs, magazines, radio stations, newspapers, and television news shows to spread their anti-Islam messages and myths. The media outlets, in turn, give members of this network the exposure needed to amplify their message, reach larger audiences, drive fundraising numbers, and grow their membership base. Some well-established conservative media outlets are a key part of this echo cham- ber, mixing coverage of alarmist threats posed by the mere existence of Muslims in America with other news stories. Chief among the media partners are the Fox News empire,1 the influential conservative magazine National Review and its website,2 a host of right-wing radio hosts, The Washington Times newspaper and website,3 and the Christian Broadcasting Network and website.4 They tout Frank Gaffney, David Yerushalmi, Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Steven Emerson, and others as experts, and invite supposedly moderate Muslim and Arabs to endorse bigoted views. In so doing, these media organizations amplify harm- ful, anti-Muslim views to wide audiences. (See box on page 86) In this chapter we profile some of the right-wing media enablers, beginning with the websites, then hate radio, then the television outlets. The websites A network of right-wing websites and blogs are frequently the primary movers of anti-Muslim messages and myths.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Passover Raisin Wine, the Temperance Movement, and Noah
    Passover Raisin Wine, The American Temperance Movement, and Mordecai Noah: The Origins, Meaning, And Wider Significance Of A Nineteenth-Century American Jewish Religious Practice JONATHAN D. SARNA Hebrew Union College -jewish Institute of Religion Cincinnati, Ohio The use of raism wine on Passover, described by Mordecai Noah (I785-I851) and considered by some in his day to have been a requirement of Jewish law, reflected (1) an old world custom that over time was trans­ formed into a "popular halacha," (2) a possible vestige of a Marrano practice, and (3) a rabbinically-sanctioned means of observing the commandments when regular kosher wine was unobtainable. Use of the wine demonstrates a desire on the part of nineteenth century American Jews to maintain se­ lected traditions and customs even under difficult "frontier" traditions. The practice enriched jewish life, served to distinguish Jews from their Christian neighbors, and helped to transform Passover into a time of religious revi­ talization. Jewish use of raisin wine also became an issue in the American temperance debate. The episode illustrates how American Christians some­ times used Jews as informants, viewed them as repositories of ancient wis­ dom, and looked to them as potential legitimators of Christian practices. Fi­ nally, the raisin wine issue sheds light on American Jewish attitudes to the temperance question as a whole. Mordecai Noah endorsed temperance as an important social cause, even as he warned adherents against extremism. Later Jews, who saw the movement at a more advanced stage, worried about the coercive evangelical fervor and nativism associated with it, and kept their distance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tea Party Movement and Entelechy: an Inductive Study of Tea Party Rhetoric By
    The Tea Party Movement and Entelechy: an Inductive Study of Tea Party Rhetoric By John Leyland Price M.A., Central Michigan University, 2013 B.S.B.A., Central Michigan University, 2010 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Communication Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chair: Dr. Robert C. Rowland Dr. Beth Innocenti Dr. Brett Bricker Dr. Scott Harris Dr. Wayne Sailor Date Defended: 5 September 2019 ii The dissertation committee for John Leyland Price certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Tea Party Movement and Entelechy: an Inductive Study of Tea Party Rhetoric Chair: Dr. Robert C. Rowland Date Approved: 5 September 7 2019 iii Abstract On February 19, 2009, CNBC journalist Rick Santelli’s fiery outburst against the Obama Administration on national television gave the Tea Party Movement (TPM) its namesake. Soon after rallies were organized across the U.S. under the Tea Party banner. From its inception in 2009, the TPM became an essential player in U.S. politics and pivotal in flipping control of the Senate and House to the Republican Party during the 2010 midterm elections. The movement faced controversy on both sides of the political spectrum for its beliefs and fervent stance against compromising with political adversaries. Researchers argued that the TPM was an example of Richard Hofstadter’s Paranoid Style. Others claimed that the movement’s rhetoric, member demographics, and political success demonstrated it was outside the boundaries of the Paranoid Style.
    [Show full text]
  • US Mainstream Media Index May 2021.Pdf
    Mainstream Media Top Investors/Donors/Owners Ownership Type Medium Reach # estimated monthly (ranked by audience size) for ranking purposes 1 Wikipedia Google was the biggest funder in 2020 Non Profit Digital Only In July 2020, there were 1,700,000,000 along with Wojcicki Foundation 5B visitors to Wikipedia. (YouTube) Foundation while the largest BBC reports, via donor to its endowment is Arcadia, a Wikipedia, that the site charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and had on average in 2020, Peter Baldwin. Other major donors 1.7 billion unique visitors include Google.org, Amazon, Musk every month. SimilarWeb Foundation, George Soros, Craig reports over 5B monthly Newmark, Facebook and the late Jim visits for April 2021. Pacha. Wikipedia spends $55M/year on salaries and programs with a total of $112M in expenses in 2020 while all content is user-generated (free). 2 FOX Rupert Murdoch has a controlling Publicly Traded TV/digital site 2.6M in Jan. 2021. 3.6 833,000,000 interest in News Corp. million households – Average weekday prime Rupert Murdoch Executive Chairman, time news audience in News Corp, son Lachlan K. Murdoch, Co- 2020. Website visits in Chairman, News Corp, Executive Dec. 2020: FOX 332M. Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, Fox Source: Adweek and Corporation, Executive Chairman, NOVA Press Gazette. However, Entertainment Group. Fox News is owned unique monthly views by the Fox Corporation, which is owned in are 113M in Dec. 2020. part by the Murdoch Family (39% share). It’s also important to point out that the same person with Fox News ownership, Rupert Murdoch, owns News Corp with the same 39% share, and News Corp owns the New York Post, HarperCollins, and the Wall Street Journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump, Trump, Trump by Paul H
    Clio’s Psyche Understanding the “Why” of Culture, Current Events, History, and Society The Trump Symposium with Commentaries Trump as a Symptom Trump Studies European and Student Reactions to Trump Why Hillary Lost Ethical Issues Volume 24 Number 1 Summer 2017 Clio’s Psyche Vol. 24 No. 1 Summer 2017 ISSN 1080-2622 Published by the Psychohistory Forum 627 Dakota Trail, Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417 Telephone: (201) 891-7486 E-mail: [email protected] Editor: Paul H. Elovitz Editorial Board C. Fred Alford, PhD University of Maryland • James W. Anderson, PhD Northwestern University • David Beisel, PhD RCC-SUNY • Donald L. Carveth, PhD York University • Lawrence J. Friedman, PhD Harvard University • Ken Fuchsman, EdD University of Connecticut • Bob Lentz • Peter Loewenberg, PhD UCLA • Peter Petschauer, PhD Appalachian State University Subscription Rate: Free to members of the Psychohistory Forum $82 two-year subscription to non-members $75 yearly to institutions (Add $60 per year outside U.S.A. & Canada) Single issue price: $29 We welcome articles of psychohistorical interest of 500-2,000 words and some up to 3,500 words that have deeper scholarship. INSTRUCTIONS FOR CONTRIBUTORS: Clio’s Psyche welcomes original manuscripts that address individual or group issues from a psychological perspective. We are interested in contemporary and historical events. Childhood, family, group trauma, mechanisms of defense, personality, political psychology, psychic trauma, and psychobiography are of special interest. Our readers come from many fields so we avoid technical terminology. All manuscripts must include 6-10 keywords that stress the psychohistorical aspects of the article and an abstract of a maximum of 100 words.
    [Show full text]
  • Jews and the Sources of Religious Freedom in Early Pennsylvania
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 4-3-2018 Jews and the Sources of Religious Freedom in Early Pennsylvania Jonathon Derek Awtrey Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Cultural History Commons, History of Religion Commons, Political History Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Awtrey, Jonathon Derek, "Jews and the Sources of Religious Freedom in Early Pennsylvania" (2018). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 4544. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/4544 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. JEWS AND THE SOURCES OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN EARLY PENNSYLVANIA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Jonathon Derek Awtrey B.S. University of West Georgia, 2007 M.A. University of West Georgia, 2009 May 2018 For Christina, Sandra, Cole, Val, Suzy, April, Les, Carolyn, John, Nita, Kevin, and families ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The years of research, writing, and revision that resulted in this dissertation derived from conversations with family members, friends, colleagues, trusted mentors, and other scholars, archivists, and editors. My entire family, but especially my mother and sisters, have sustained my intellectual curiosity from an early age.
    [Show full text]
  • Obama Truthers--He's Gay and His BC Is a Total Forgery
    Obama truthers--he's gay and his BC is a total forgery NewsFollowUp.com Franklin Scandal Omaha search pictorial index sitemap home .... OBAMA TOP 10 FRAUD .... The Right and Left Obama Truthers Obama's public personal records The Right and are a total fraud. We agree. It's most importantly a blackmail issue and the public's duty to uncover deception. Left Obama MORE and Donald Trump: Trump's video, $5 million to charities if he releases personal records. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgOq9pBkY0I&feature=youtu.be&hd=1 Truthers Selective Service card VP Joe Biden Purple Hotel Spencer, Bland & Young Limbaugh, Corsi more 14 Expert Reports on technical analysis of the Obama public records Jerome Corsi believes Obama is Gay. Rush Limbaugh's Straight Entertainment says Obama is gay. HillBuzz interview with Larry Sinclair (gay tryst with Obama) Israel Science & Technology says Obama's birth certificate is a forgery based on expert analysis of the typography and layout of elements in the long-form birth certificate. ... layers Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio (Arizona) determined in 2012 there is probable cause to suspect the document released by the White House as Barack Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery MORE News for the 99% ...................................Refresh F5...archive home NFU MOST ACTIVE PA Go to Alphabetic list 50th Anniversary of JFK assassination Academic Freedom "Event of a Lifetime" at the Fess Conference Parker Double Tree Inn. Obama Death List JFKSantaBarbara. Rothschild Timeline Bush / Clinton Body Count Back to Obama Home Obama Gay Chicago Spencer, Bland and Young Examiner Who is Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Chicago 2012 Campaign Soetoro? It is alleged that Barack Obama has spent $950,000 to $1.7 million with 11 law firms in 12 Lawsuit dismissed below states to block disclosure of his personal records; which includes birth information, K-12 education, Stuart Levine, Ashley Turton below Occidental College, Columbia University, and Clinton, Sinclair Harvard Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Birth of the Nationalist Movement
    January 13, 2021 www.porcupinesoup.com Tracing Your Roots in Greene County By Sylvia Hasenkopf Revisiting the birth of the nationalist movement The founding of the Know Nothing Party and its surprising ties to Greenville One of the rewards of running the Tracing Know Nothings. Your Roots in Greene County website O.H. Wright writes, “my school flourishes as (www.tracingyourrootsgcny.com) is that users of or even better than I expected. I’ve had some the site often contact me to share items that they reverses lately caused by the infatuated Know have in their personal archives. Nothings, The most vile, polluted, degraded & Such was the case of Burt Wright from God neglected tribe that has been since the California a number of years ago. He is builders of the Tower of Babel. They stole into descended from the Wrights of Wright Street in my Academy in the darkness of night (a time the town of Durham and he had asked me to do most fit for the transactions of such business as some research for him on the family. One day, I theirs) with a false key, left my rooms in the opened an email from him, which contained a most gormandizing & hoggish condition.” scan of a letter that he had in his possession. It This peaked my interest as I had never heard was a rather angry letter written by his great- of this group before. Who were the Know grandfather, O. H. Wright, who had been the Nothings and why did they exist? It all came principal of the Greenville Academy in the down to feelings of fear and the mass hysteria 1850’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Propaganda Model 1
    A PARTICIPATORY PROPAGANDA MODEL 1 Participatory Propaganda: The Engagement of Audiences in the Spread of Persuasive Communications Alicia Wanless Michael Berk Director of Strategic Communications, Visiting Research Fellow, SecDev Foundation Centre for Cyber Security and International [email protected] Relations Studies, University of Florence [email protected] Paper presented at the "Social Media & Social Order, Culture Conflict 2.0" conference organized by Cultural Conflict 2.0 and sponsored by the Research Council of Norway on 1 December 2017, Oslo. To be published as part of the conference proceedings in 2018. A PARTICIPATORY PROPAGANDA MODEL 2 Abstract Existing research on aspects of propaganda in a digital age tend to focus on isolated techniques or phenomena, such as fake news, trolls, memes, or botnets. Providing invaluable insight on the evolving human-technology interaction in creating new formats of persuasive messaging, these studies lend to an enriched understanding of modern propaganda methods. At the same time, the true effects and magnitude of successful influencing of large audiences in the digital age can only be understood if target audiences are perceived not only as ‘objects’ of influence, but as ‘subjects’ of persuasive communications as well. Drawing from vast available research, as well as original social network and content analyses conducted during the 2016 U.S. presidential elections, this paper presents a new, qualitatively enhanced, model of modern propaganda – “participatory propaganda” - and discusses its effects on modern democratic societies. Keywords: propaganda, Facebook, social network analysis, content analysis, politics A PARTICIPATORY PROPAGANDA MODEL 3 Participatory Propaganda: The Engagement of Audiences in the Spread of Persuasive Communications Rapidly evolving information communications technologies (ICTs) have drastically altered the ways individuals engage in the public information domain, including news ways of becoming subjected to external influencing.
    [Show full text]
  • Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S
    Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S. Congress By Corey Michael Brooks A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Robin L. Einhorn, Chair Professor David M. Henkin Professor Eric Schickler Fall 2010 Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S. Congress © 2010 By Corey Michael Brooks 1 Abstract Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S. Congress by Corey Michael Brooks Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Robin L. Einhorn, Chair This dissertation reintegrates abolitionism into the main currents of U.S. political history. Because of a bifurcation between studies of the American antislavery movement and political histories of the sectional conflict, modern scholars have drastically underestimated the significance of abolitionist political activism. Historians often characterize political abolitionists as naïve idealists or separatist moral purists, but I recast them as practical, effective politicians, who capitalized on rare openings in American political institutions to achieve outsized influence in the face of a robust two-party system. Third-party abolitionists shaped national debate far beyond their numbers and played central roles in the emergence of the Republican Party. Over the second half of the 1830s, political abolitionists devised the Slave Power concept, claiming that slaveholder control of the federal government endangered American democracy; this would later become the Republicans‘ most important appeal. Integrating this argument with an institutional analysis of the Second Party System, antislavery activists assailed the Whigs and Democrats—cross-sectional parties that incorporated antislavery voices while supporting proslavery policies—as beholden to the Slave Power.
    [Show full text]
  • Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S. Congress Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1b385471 Author Brooks, Corey Michael Publication Date 2010 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S. Congress By Corey Michael Brooks A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Robin L. Einhorn, Chair Professor David M. Henkin Professor Eric Schickler Fall 2010 Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S. Congress © 2010 By Corey Michael Brooks 1 Abstract Building an Antislavery House: Political Abolitionists and the U.S. Congress by Corey Michael Brooks Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Robin L. Einhorn, Chair This dissertation reintegrates abolitionism into the main currents of U.S. political history. Because of a bifurcation between studies of the American antislavery movement and political histories of the sectional conflict, modern scholars have drastically underestimated the significance of abolitionist political activism. Historians often characterize political abolitionists as naïve idealists or separatist moral purists, but I recast them as practical, effective politicians, who capitalized on rare openings in American political institutions to achieve outsized influence in the face of a robust two-party system. Third-party abolitionists shaped national debate far beyond their numbers and played central roles in the emergence of the Republican Party.
    [Show full text]