Electoral System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Electoral System Wesleyan University The Honors College Explaining the Sizes of National Legislatures by Daniel Dreyfus Class of 2017 A thesis submitted to the faculty of Wesleyan University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts with Departmental Honors from the College of Social Studies Middletown, Connecticut April, 2017 i Contents List of Figures and Tables............................................................................................ iv Chapter I................................................................................................................... iv Chapter II ................................................................................................................. iv Chapter III ................................................................................................................ iv Chapter IV ................................................................................................................. v Chapter V .................................................................................................................. v Appendix A ............................................................................................................... v Appendix C ............................................................................................................... v Appendix D ............................................................................................................... v Appendix E ............................................................................................................... v Appendix F............................................................................................................... vi I: Introduction and Overview ........................................................................................ 1 Legislatures and Legislature Size ............................................................................. 1 What is Legislature Size? ...................................................................................... 2 The Consequences of Legislature Size ..................................................................... 3 Public Choice: Legislative Productivity ............................................................... 4 Public Choice: Distributive Politics ...................................................................... 7 Explaining the Sizes of National Legislatures ........................................................ 11 Research Design...................................................................................................... 16 II: Factors Potentially Associated with Legislature Size ............................................ 19 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 19 Scope of Analysis: States, Legislatures, and Chambers ......................................... 19 Overview and Explanation of Variables ................................................................. 21 Static versus Dynamic Relationships .................................................................. 21 Population ........................................................................................................... 25 Electoral System ................................................................................................. 27 ii Continent ............................................................................................................. 32 Date of Formation ............................................................................................... 35 GDP per Capita ................................................................................................... 37 Form of Government........................................................................................... 39 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 46 III: Static and Dynamic Analyses ............................................................................... 47 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 47 Static Analysis ........................................................................................................ 48 Summary Statistics.............................................................................................. 48 Results ................................................................................................................. 51 Discussion ........................................................................................................... 55 Dynamic Analysis ................................................................................................... 60 Summary Statistics.............................................................................................. 60 Results ................................................................................................................. 61 Discussion ........................................................................................................... 65 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 66 IV: The American Model ............................................................................................ 68 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 68 The Growth Phases, 1789-1921 .............................................................................. 71 Phase 1: Rapid Growth, 1789-1843 .................................................................... 72 Phase 2: Slow Growth, 1843-1873 ..................................................................... 75 Phase 3: No State Loses a Seat, 1873-1921 ........................................................ 78 Phase 4: The Size Is Fixed, 1921-1929 ................................................................... 81 Overview ............................................................................................................. 81 The First Debate, 18-19 January 1921 ................................................................ 84 The Second Debate, 14 October 1921 ................................................................ 88 Why 435? ............................................................................................................ 89 Subsequent Developments ...................................................................................... 91 iii Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 93 V: The British Model .................................................................................................. 98 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 98 Phase 1: Growth of the Commons under the Tudors and Stuarts, 1510-1679 ...... 101 Incorporation of Scotland and Ireland, 1707-8 and 1801-2 .................................. 107 Phase 2: Reform and Redistribution without Reduction, 1832-1867 ................... 111 Phase 3: Growth since 1885 .................................................................................. 115 Conclusion and Aftermath .................................................................................... 120 VI: Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 124 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... 128 Appendix and Data Availability Guide..................................................................... 129 Appendix A: Additional Variable Discussion .......................................................... 130 Electoral System: Mathematical Definition .......................................................... 130 Date of Formation: Challenges of Operationalization .......................................... 131 Form of Government: Objective and Subjective Criteria ..................................... 134 Appendix C: Static Analysis Regressions................................................................. 138 Appendix D: Apportionment of the House of Representatives ................................ 144 Appendix E: Positions on the Size of the House of Representatives in 1921 ........... 165 H.R. 14498 (18-19 January 1921)......................................................................... 165 H.R. 7882 (14 October 1921) ............................................................................... 167 Appendix F: Constituencies of the House of Commons since 1509 ........................ 170 Bibliography ............................................................................................................. 197 iv List of Figures and Tables Chapter I • Figure 1.1: The Law of 1/n 9 • Figure 1.2: Lower House Size of U.S. State Legislatures in 1889 and 1969 13 • Figure 1.3: Linear Regression of the Logarithm of Lower House Size in U.S. State Legislatures 14 • Figure 1.4: Linear Regression of the Logarithm of Lower House Size in National Legislatures 14 Chapter II • Figure 2.1: The Relationship between Continent and Date of Formation 37 • Table 2.1: States That No Longer Exist in Bormann and Golder 24 • Table 2.2: The Six Continents
Recommended publications
  • Recognition of the Khojaly Genocide at the ICO
    Administrative Department of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan P R E S I D E N T I A L L I B R A R Y ────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Recognition of the Genocide of Khojaly The member of the US California Assembly recognizes Khojaly Massacre (March 25, 2009) ............................................................................................................................................... 4 The recognition of the Khojaly Genocide at the ICO ............................................................... 5 Massachusetts State of the United States recognizes Khojaly tragedy as a massacre (February 25, 2010) ...................................................................................................................... 7 Recognition of the Khojaly genocide by Pakistan ..................................................................... 8 Recognition of the Khojaly massacre in Mexico ........................................................................ 9 The resolution adopted by the Senate of Mexico (October 27, 2011) .................................... 10 The resolution adopted by the Chamber of Deputies of Mexico (November 30, 2011) ....... 13 Khojaly to be recognized as Genocide in International level: representatives of the Parliaments of 51 States adopts the relevant resolution (January 31, 2012) ........................ 18 Texas House of Representatives passes resolution on Khojaly genocide (February 21, 2012) .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gordon, Robert C. F
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR ROBERT C. F. GORDON Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: January 25, 1989 Copyright 1998 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background ducation arly career Baghdad 1956-1959 Baghdad Pact Organi%ation Political situation Coup Attacks on American embassy (hartoum 1959-1961 Military government Ambassador Moose Political situation Tan%ania 1964-1965 Ambassador ,illiam -eonhard Persona Non /rata President Nyerere 0ome assignment Personnel 1912-1920 Dealing with complaints Selection process ,illiam Macomber Handicapped facilities Florence 1912-1912 6.S. interests in Florence Dealing with local communist governments ye disease 1 Mauritius 1920-1928 6.S. interests in Mauritius Political situation conomic situation Conclusion Achievements Foreign Service as a career INTERVIEW Q: Mr. Ambassador, how did you become attracted to foreign affairs) /O0DO.9 ,ell, I was born and raised in a very small town in Southwest Colorado. And my father had been in the Spanish-American ,ar and had left and come back through Mexico where he stopped off and worked in the American mbassy in Mexico City for awhile on his way back to the States. And he used to talk about it. I loved travel books, and maps, and so forth. As a result, when I went to college, instead of going to the 6niversity of Colorado, I went to the 6niversity of California at Berkeley because it had a major in international relations. So I sort of had this idea in the back of my head, not knowing really what it was, since high school days.
    [Show full text]
  • The United Nations' Political Aversion to the European Microstates
    UN-WELCOME: The United Nations’ Political Aversion to the European Microstates -- A Thesis -- Submitted to the University of Michigan, in partial fulfillment for the degree of HONORS BACHELOR OF ARTS Department Of Political Science Stephen R. Snyder MARCH 2010 “Elephants… hate the mouse worst of living creatures, and if they see one merely touch the fodder placed in their stall they refuse it with disgust.” -Pliny the Elder, Naturalis Historia, 77 AD Acknowledgments Though only one name can appear on the author’s line, there are many people whose support and help made this thesis possible and without whom, I would be nowhere. First, I must thank my family. As a child, my mother and father would try to stump me with a difficult math and geography question before tucking me into bed each night (and a few times they succeeded!). Thank you for giving birth to my fascination in all things international. Without you, none of this would have been possible. Second, I must thank a set of distinguished professors. Professor Mika LaVaque-Manty, thank you for giving me a chance to prove myself, even though I was a sophomore and studying abroad did not fit with the traditional path of thesis writers; thank you again for encouraging us all to think outside the box. My adviser, Professor Jenna Bednar, thank you for your enthusiastic interest in my thesis and having the vision to see what needed to be accentuated to pull a strong thesis out from the weeds. Professor Andrei Markovits, thank you for your commitment to your students’ work; I still believe in those words of the Moroccan scholar and will always appreciate your frank advice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strange Revival of Bicameralism
    The Strange Revival of Bicameralism Coakley, J. (2014). The Strange Revival of Bicameralism. Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(4), 542-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.926168 Published in: Journal of Legislative Studies Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2014 Taylor & Francis. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:01. Oct. 2021 Published in Journal of Legislative Studies , 20 (4) 2014, pp. 542-572; doi: 10.1080/13572334.2014.926168 THE STRANGE REVIVAL OF BICAMERALISM John Coakley School of Politics and International Relations University College Dublin School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy Queen’s University Belfast [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT The turn of the twenty-first century witnessed a surprising reversal of the long-observed trend towards the disappearance of second chambers in unitary states, with 25 countries— all but one of them unitary—adopting the bicameral system.
    [Show full text]
  • All Countries Visualization.Pdf
    customs tariffamends principal hospitals board board control trade marks board hospital monetary authority marine board inserting next proceeds crime control over hospital insurance international sanctions government fees hospital fees merchant shipping medical practitioner legislative instruments authority application compliance authority reporting standard airworthiness directive pbssubsidised treatment radius centred thousand penalty authority procedures upon conviction column table tariff concession prudential standard column headed units imprisonment state territory specified column health research circle radius education institution copyright ministry meaning provided treatment cycle delegate chief millennium challenge liable upon statutory instrument penalty units affairs government financial supervision disciplinary committee Bermuda arising from legal person residence permit supervisory board traditional beer activity licence procedure provided approved maintenance rural municipality town council medicinal products regulatory authority requirements provided specified clause town clerk licensed premises established regulation district council close company specified employer supervision authority public sewer acts regulations insurance undertaking deleting words council resolution pouhere taonga pursuant procedure sleepovers performed information concerning eastern caribbean first reading financial markets punishable fine legal affairs exceeding months Australia statutory acknowledgement registrar general ministry legal antigua
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5 Issue 2 2013
    VOLUME 5 ISSUE 2 2013 ISSN: 2036-5438 VOL. 5, ISSUE 2, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL ISSUE Regional Parliaments in the European Union: A comparison between Italy and Spain Edited by Josep M. Castellà Andreu, Eduardo Gianfrancesco, Nicola Lupo and Anna Mastromarino ESSAYS National and Regional Parliaments in the EU decision-making process, after the The Relationship between State and Treaty of Lisbon and the Euro-crisis Regional Legislatures, Starting from the NICOLA LUPO E- 1-28 Early Warning Mechanism CRISTINA FASONE E-122-155 Spanish Autonomous Communities and EU policies State accountability for violations of EU law AGUSTÍN RUIZ ROBLEDO E- 29-50 by Regions: infringement proceedings and the right of recourse The scrutiny of the principle of subsidiarity CRISTINA BERTOLINO E-156-177 by autonomous regional parliaments with particular reference to the participation of the Parliament of Catalonia in the early warning system ESTHER MARTÍN NÚÑEZ E- 51-73 Early warning and regional parliaments: in search of a new model. Suggestions from the Basque experience JOSU OSÉS ABANDO E- 74-88 The evolving role of the Italian Conference system in representing regional interest in EU decision-making ELENA GRIGLIO E- 89-121 ISSN: 2036-5438 National and Regional Parliaments in the EU decision-making process, after the Treaty of Lisbon and the Euro-crisis by Nicola Lupo Perspectives on Federalism, Vol. 5, issue 2, 2013 Except where otherwise noted content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.5 Italy License E - 1 Abstract The Treaty of Lisbon increased the role of National and Regional Parliaments in the EU decision-making process, in order to compensate for some of the weaknesses of the European institutional architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21St Century
    Serving Scotland Better: Better: Scotland Serving Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century Final Report – June 2009 Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century 21st the in Kingdom United the and Scotland Commission on Scottish Devolution Secretariat 1 Melville Crescent Edinburgh EH3 7HW 2009 June – Report Final Tel: (020) 7270 6759 or (0131) 244 9073 Email: [email protected] This Report is also available online at: www.commissiononscottishdevolution.org.uk © Produced by the Commission on Scottish Devolution 75% Printed on paper consisting of 75% recycled waste Presented to the Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament and to the Secretary of State for Scotland, on behalf of Her Majesty’s Government, June 2009 Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century | Final Report – June 2009 Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the United Kingdom in the 21st Century It was a privilege to be asked to chair a Commission to consider how the Scottish Parliament could serve the people of Scotland better. It is a task that has taken just over a year and seen my colleagues and me travelling the length and breadth of Scotland. It has been very hard work – but also very rewarding. Many of the issues are complex, but at the heart of this is our desire to find ways to help improve the lives of the people of Scotland. The reward has been in meeting so many people and discussing the issues with them – at formal evidence sessions, at informal meetings, and at engagement events across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Five European Microstates
    Geoforum, Vol. 6, pp. 187-204, 1975. Pergamon Press Ltd. Printed in Great Britain The Plight of the Lilliputians: an Analysis of Five European Microstates Honor6 M. CATUDAL, Jr., Collegeville, Minn.” Summary: The mini- or microstate is an important but little studied phenomenon in political geography. This article seeks to redress the balance and give these entities some of the attention they deserve. In general, five microstates are examined; all are located in Western Europe-Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco, San Marino and the Vatican. The degree to which each is autonomous in its internal affairs is thoroughly explored. And the extent to which each has control over its external relations is investigated. Disadvantages stemming from its small size strike at the heart of the ministate problem. And they have forced these nations to adopt practices which should be of use to large states. Zusammenfassung: Dem Zwergstaat hat die politische Geographie wenig Beachtung geschenkt. Urn diese Liicke zu verengen, werden hier fiinf Zwergstaaten im westlichen Europa untersucht: Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco, San Marino und der Vatikan. Das Ma13der inneren und lul3eren Autonomie wird griindlich untersucht. Die Kleinheit hat die Zwargstaaten zu Anpassungsformen gezwungen, die such fiir groRe Staaten van Bedeutung sein k8nnten. R&sum& Les Etats nains n’ont g&e fait I’objet d’Btudes de geographic politique. Afin de combler cette lacune, cinq mini-Etats sent examines ici; il s’agit de I’Andorre, du Liechtenstein, de Monaco, de Saint-Marin et du Vatican. Dans quelle mesure ces Etats disposent-ils de l’autonomie interne at ont-ils le contrble de leurs relations extirieures.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland and the Isle of Man, C.1400-1625 : Noble Power and Royal Presumption in the Northern Irish Sea Province
    University of Huddersfield Repository Thornton, Tim Scotland and the Isle of Man, c.1400-1625 : noble power and royal presumption in the Northern Irish Sea province Original Citation Thornton, Tim (1998) Scotland and the Isle of Man, c.1400-1625 : noble power and royal presumption in the Northern Irish Sea province. Scottish Historical Review, 77 (1). pp. 1-30. ISSN 0036-9241 This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/4136/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ The Scottish Historical Review, Volume LXXVII, 1: No. 203: April 1998, 1-30 TIM THORNTON Scotland and the Isle of Man, c.1400-1625: Noble Power and Royal Presumption in the Northern Irish Sea Province One of the major trends in Western European historiography in the last twenty years has been a fascination with territorial expansion and with the consolidation of the nascent national states of the late medieval and early modern period.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by the Most Excellent Captains Regent of the Republic Of
    Statement By The Most Excellent Captains Regent Of the Republic of San Marino Mrs. Fausta Simona Morganti and Mr. Cesare Antonio Gasperoni At the High Level Plenary Meeting of the 60th Session of the General Assembly Of the United Nations Thursday, September 15th , 2005 Please check against delivery Mr President, Mr Secretary General, Excellencies, Honourable Delegates, Ladies and Gentlemen, I am taking the floor today also on behalf of my Peer since, according to our legal system, the Republic of San Marino has two Heads of State, who jointly guarantee a democratic decision-making process. After having identified and established, five years ago, in this very hall, the main goals to be achieved at the beginning of the XXI century, we now gather again to discuss and decide how to reach them. Undoubtedly, the success of this five year old process - or its failure - depends only on us. The challenges of the Millennium Declaration, contained in the Secretary General report entitled "In larger freedom: towards development, security and human rights for all" are trans-national in nature and trans-institutional in terms of possible solutions. We are gathered here because we are aware that these challenges cannot be addressed individually by each Country. Indeed, a close cooperation among Governments, international organizations and non-governmental organizations representing all sectors of civil society is essential. In this spirit, the Republic of San Marino - characterized by a century- old tradition of freedom, democracy, peace and solidarity - has always upheld multilateralism, prompted by the conviction that in the modern world there are no frontiers able to stop both positive and negative events.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Database 10 September 2020 Nb
    EXECUTIVE DATABASE 10 SEPTEMBER 2020 NB: THIS DATABASE IS BASED ON INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM SA MISSIONS POLITICAL DESKS FOREIGN MISSIONS COUNTRY HEAD OF STATE DATE OF HEAD OF GOVERNMENT DATE OF MINISTER OF FOREIGN CAPITAL CITY INAUGURATION (PRIME MINISTER) APPOINTMENT AFFAIRS African Union HE Mr Matamela Cyril 12/02/2020 HE Mr Moussa Faki 14/03/2017 Addis Ababa (AU) Ramaphosa Mahamat Chairperson Chairperson of the African Union Commission0 Islamic Republic HE Mr Ashraf Ghani 29/09/2014 Chief Executive 29/09/2014 HE Haroon Kabul of Afghanistan Chakhansuri (acting) President Mr Abdullah Abdullah Minister of Foreign Affairs 23/01/2020 Republic of HE Mr Ilir Rexhep Metaj 24/07/2017 HE Mr Edi Rama 15/09/2013 HE Mr Edi Rama Tirana Albania President Prime Minister Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs 21/01/2019 Gent Cakaj Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs (with full responsibility as a Minister) 22/01/2019 Democratic HE Mr Abdelmadjid Tebboune 19/12/2019 HE Mr Abdelaziz Djerad 28/12/2019 HE Ms Sabri Boukadoum Algiers People’s President Prime Minister presiding Minister of Foreign Affairs Republic of over the Council of and International Algeria Ministers Cooperation Head of Government 02/04/2019 Principality of HE Bishop Joan Enric VIVES I 16/05/2019 HE Mr Xavier Espot 17/07/2017 HE Mrs Maria Ubach Font Andorra La Andorra SICILIA Zamora Vella Minister of Foreign Affairs (Co-Prince of Andorra) Prime Minister (Letters to each HE Mr Emmanuel Macron Co-Prince) (Co-Prince of Andorra) Republic of HE Mr João Manuel 26/09/2017 HOS is
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from Other Parliaments
    The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Learning from other parliaments Study Program 2006 House of Representatives Standing Committee on Procedure August 2006 © Commonwealth of Australia 2006 ISBN 0 642 78826 X (printed version) ISBN 0 642 78827 8 (HTML version) Contents Foreword...................................................................................................................................................vii Participants..............................................................................................................................................viii 1 Overview of visit ..................................................................................................... 1 Background.....................................................................................................................................1 The program....................................................................................................................................2 Major themes...................................................................................................................................3 Overview Conclusion.....................................................................................................................4 2 Themes and issues................................................................................................. 5 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]