The Blue Water Bridge – an International Treasure

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Blue Water Bridge – an International Treasure The Blue Water Bridge – An International Treasure Jeff Friedland Director of Emergency Management/Homeland Security for St. Clair County Jeff Brooks Deputy Manager of Emergency Management Services for The Corporation of the County of Lambton Bluewater Region - A Shared Community Sarnia, Ontario Port Huron, Michigan Who Are We? Our Border Represents Trillions of Dollars to Both Nation’s Economy! 3 A Tale of Two Counties – The Bluewater Region St. Clair County Lambton County Population 170,119 Population is 126,971 City of Port Huron - Population of 31,083. City of Sarnia – Population of 70,876 The County is comprised of six cities, The County is comprised of eleven member twenty-three townships, two villages and municipalities. other communities. The County is located at the southern– The County is located at the southern-most tip most tip of Lake Huron on the western of Lake Huron on the eastern shores of Lake shores of the St. Clair River. Saint Clair. The County’s major transportation routes The County’s major transportation routes are are I-69 from Lansing & Flint and I-94 from Highways 402 from London, Highway 40 to 401 Detroit. Windsor and Highway 21 to the eastern shores of Lake Huron. The County is also home to the Walpole Island First Nations Reserve, the Aamjiwnaang First Nation in Sarnia, and the Kettle & Stony Point First Nation in the Municipality of Lambton Shores. Blue Water Bridge Hazardous Materials Crossing for the Midwest Rank Category #1 Entry point for carriers of hazardous, radioactive and flammable materials between Michigan and Canada. #2 Entry point in the United States for hazardous materials imports #2 Busiest northern border crossing in North America #3 Busiest entry point for the entire North American continent The Blue Water Bridge provides a crossing for 4,800 commercial trucks and 12,000 passenger vehicles daily and 5.8 million commercial and passenger vehicles annually. CN Rail Tunnel The new CN International Rail Tunnel was built in 1995. In 2004, Port Huron revenues at $22 billion - #1 rail port in North America The Tunnel accommodates all double- stacked containers & multi-level automotive carriers at a height of 8.4 meters. The new tunnel cuts transit time by up to 24 hours to the mid-western U.S. The CN rail yard in Sarnia is the largest rail yard handling dangerous goods in the Great Lakes Region. The CN rail yard is also considered the second largest “international” rail yard in Canada carrying more freight than any other U.S. – Canada border rail crossing. Transportation Corridors Refineries and Chemical Plants The Chemical Valley extends across the Industries Include: municipal boundaries of the City of • Air Products Sarnia & the Township of St. Clair • BP Canada representing one of the largest grouping • Basell Canada of petro-chemical industries and • Cabot Canada refineries in Canada. • Dow Chemicals • ENOS There are over 55 members of the • H.C. Starke Chemical Valley Emergency • Invista Coordinating organization with 25 • Imperial Oil consider major chemical Plants. • LanXess • Nova Chemicals (4 Sites) These industries, pipelines, and • Praxair (2 Sites) transportation corridors account for 40% • Shell Canada of the chemicals in Canada which • Suncor represents 80% of the chemicals in • Terra Nitrogen Ontario. Market potential in excess of $160 Billion by 2010 Pipelines Approximately 40 pipelines connect the U.S. and Canada beneath the St. Clair River. They carry a product value greater than $2.1 Billion (2004). These pipes range in diameter from 6 to 48 inches. It has been estimated that 12 additional bridges would be required if this product were to be transported by truck. Energy - Electricity There are 8 power generating facilities located in the region. These are vital to maintaining power to the 1.9 million customers in the region service area. Lambton Generating Station has a generating capacity of 1975 Megawatts. TransAlta in Sarnia provides at its main facility 440 –Megawatts and 135 MW at its secondary site. Greenfield Energy Centre natural gas-fired combined cycle electricity generating facility with an OPA contracted capacity of 1,005 MW St. Clair Energy St Clair generates 570 megawatts. The Belle River Plant generates 1664.4 mega watts, Detroit Edison's third largest producer of power, and the St. Clair Plant generates 1928.6 mega watts, the second largest producer. In addition to this St. Clair County has Greenwood generation station. Water There are 12 water filtration plants within the Blue Water region. The largest provides potable water to 1.1 million users in the City of Detroit Water System. In addition, there are numerous industrial water intake areas. CRITICALITY OF SEAMLESS CROSS BORDER COMMUNICATIONS 2008 US / Canadian / Mexican State/Local Border Initiative in Phoenix, Arizona • Invitation only • 50 participants • 3 from Blue Water Area Morning session focused on Blue Water region issues 13 Naval Postgraduate School & Mobile Education Team • Coordinated by the Center for Homeland Defense and Security at the Naval Post Graduate School • Mobile Education Team (MET) program is an intensive half-day seminar on homeland security • Seminars conducted by nationally recognized experts • Focused exclusively on enhancing the capacity of government officials to successfully address new homeland security challenges St. Clair County Mobile Education Team • 2006 – Weapons of Mass Destruction Policy • 2007 – Continuity of Operations/Essential Services • 2008 – Cross Border Planning Cross-Border Discussions • Cross-Border “All-Hazards” preparedness planning through risk-based integrated planning • Strengthen the cross-border operational capabilities to respond and recover from a cross-border incident • Improve lines of communications primarily between first responders and local officials • Strengthen public and private sector cross-border planning, prevention, response, mitigation and recovery • Eliminate reduce the effect of US and Canadian regulatory issues that prohibit or hinder cross border coordination and mutual support siRRonWong- Flickr Major Discussion Themes: • Improvements can be made regarding lines of communications, primarily between first responders and local officials • The effectiveness of agreements between local, state and federal partners and how they can be improved or modified to enhance the region’s ability to respond to an international incident. • Specifically in regard to response capability, the seminar focused on the availability of response resources, who is in charge of those resources, and daily surge capacity. Identified Gaps: • Joint Public Warning, Notification and Information System Integration • Joint Sheltering System • Tactical Interoperable Communications Plan • Discussion of Joint Planning Team • Inability to share real time data.
Recommended publications
  • Official Road Map of Ontario
    4 Ipperwash 5 r Corbett e Corners 27 v Kettle Pt. Beach 21 i dc 18 19 20 hg 22 139 123 P R Harrin Northville a Grantonji24ji 28 83° 82° 10 rk 24 hi hg Ravenswood 18 ll C 24 hg 47 Uniondale 79 r. hg 59 hghg Clandeboye hgLucan 7 27 Medina Lakeside Thedford 21 hg hg 7 dc C.N.R. 25 Sylvan Parkhill hg R hg 9 6 6 20 Elginfield hg O 7 Ailsa Craig 119 hg hg 7 hg 7 M hg e ji N Lambton Shores Denfieldhg 23 16 E hg 4 d 31 12 9 17 w hg hg 27 16 Kintore 25 Forest dca hg Hi hg Bryanston cko hg Birr y hg hg hgr 6 28 R mn MICHIGAN U.S.A. y Nairn 20 hg 81 C hg ONTARIO CANADA hg Arkona A ble r Thorndale 7 30 hgusa Ilderton . X 21 Cr. 19 16 E hg 14 Brights hg hg Ballymote Fanshawe Point 11dc 12 hg 17 S 43°43° Grove Camlachie hgKeyser L. 2 hg . 28 Edward 13 9 79 hger 16 Cr Arva 27 Thamesford hg Port 7 Plympton-Wyoming iv E 20 hg hg Ing hghg R hg Huron 6 hg 30 Hickory hg 69 3 9 14 15 Warwick Coldstream O 9hg 9 34 22 Adelaide Corner LONDON 73 45 1 O O O 22 L rq O hg 22 Lobo Melrose hg hg O 22 25 10 hg 32 k . 11 Poplar 44 r 9 hg C.N.R. hgPu SarniahgMandauminOReece's 22 e 56 4 69 w hgDorchester43° e C 65 o Cors.
    [Show full text]
  • R0202'11 LSB Research Services Division MG
    Rep. McCann offered the following concurrent resolution: House Concurrent Resolution No. 41. A concurrent resolution to urge the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) to pursue bicycle friendly policies by providing for bicycles on board trains and bicycle parking in future station plans. Whereas, An efficient, modern, transportation system is a pillar of a healthy economic climate and vital for Michigan's future. All modes of 21st century transportation infrastructure should be made accessible to modern travelers, whether tourists or commuters. Seamless multi-modal connections are essential to facilitate tourism and to allow greater mobility for bike commuters and those without cars. Bicyclists should be able to switch between transportation modes and link trips by bringing bicycles on trains without having to check them as boxed luggage. Bicycle tourism and commuting would be further accommodated with short and long-term bike parking at Amtrak stations. Unfortunately, Amtrak does not allow bicycles on board Michigan routes at this time and bike parking is not always available; and Whereas, Amtrak's routes out of Chicago, the Downstate Illinois Service and Missouri River Runner, offer roll-on bike service; the option to bring bicycles on board, either by storing bikes on board in bike racks, or secured as checked baggage with tie-down equipment (not in a box), and allow folding bicycles on board as carry-on baggage. All three of the Michigan Amtrak routes, The Blue Water, Lake Shore Limited and Pere Marquette lines, use the same equipment as Chicago area trains and would only have to update the reservations system to allow bikes on board in Michigan; and Whereas, Bicycle tourism is a booming industry and many Michigan bike tour events are located in or near cities accessible by Amtrak service.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Water Bridge FEIS Executive Summary
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) discusses the Recommended Alternative for improving the United States Inspection Facility at the Blue Water Bridge Plaza and the I‐94/I‐69 corridor in St. Clair County, Michigan. This project is commonly referred to as the Blue Water Bridge Plaza Study. The Final EIS was prepared as a Condensed Final EIS. This approach avoids repetition of material from the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) by incorporating, by reference, the DEIS resulting in a much shorter document than under the traditional FEIS approach. This document still provides the reader with a complete overview of the project and its impacts on the human and natural environments. This FEIS focuses on changes in the project’s setting, impacts, technical analysis, and mitigation measures that have occurred since the DEIS was circulated. What is the United States Plaza at the Blue Water Bridge? The United States Plaza, which is owned by the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), is the inspection facility for vehicles entering the United States. The Blue Water Bridge is a major border crossing for cars and trucks between the United States and Canada. The Blue Water Bridge consists of two bridge spans over the St. Clair River, one for traffic to Canada and one for traffic to the United States. The bridges are jointly owned by MDOT and Blue Water Bridge Canada (BWBC). Federal agencies operating on the plaza include the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the United Existing United States Blue Water Bridge Plaza States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018-2019
    Annual Report 2018‐2019 Science Education Partnership A better world through hands‐on, minds‐on science education 2018‐2019: KEY ACHIEVEMENTS classrooms were visited by volunteer farmers for Canada Agriculture Day science kits were revamped science kit bookings were made by different of schools within the teachers at schools Lambton Kent and St. Clair Catholic Districts accessed SEP programs this year, volunteers were active in the impacting an estimated newly students reorganized Science Discovery Squad volunteer 30 classrooms participated in the program unveiled National Engineering Month in February Challenge. A new Virtual Volunteer activity format was piloted with great success Page 1 NEW IN 2019: INTRODUCING THE SCIENCE DISCOVERY SQUAD The 2018‐2019 school year brought about exciting changes to SEP volunteer initiatives. The very first SEP volunteer program, “Adopt‐a‐ Scientist”, began in 1995 when Imperial Oil retirees were asked if they would like to help in the classroom. Initially, volunteers could be “adopted” by teachers who would have them in on a regular basis, but it soon became evident that educators were asking for help repeatedly in the same subject areas. In response, volunteers created interactive, hands‐on presentations that could travel to from Superintendents Laura Callaghan and Ben Hazzard, along with SEP Technician Wendy Hooghiem, watch pie plates fly from a classroom to classroom. Van der Graaf machine generator with SDS volunteer Peter Smith. In 2004, volunteer activities expanded to include bridge‐building sessions that celebrated National Engineering Month and fit with the Structures and Mechanisms strand of the Ontario Curriculum. Between 25 and 40 classes have participated each year since.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Border Crossings
    Canadian Border Crossings Port Canadian City/Town Province Highway Crossing U.S. City/Town Code 709 Chief Mountain Alberta Chief Mountain via Babb, MT 705 Coutts Alberta Hwy 4 Coutts Sweetgrass, MT 708 Del Bonita Alberta Del Bonita (via Cut Bank), MT 706 Aden Alberta Hwy 880 Whitlash, MT 711 Wild Horse Alberta Hwy 41 Simpson, MT 711 Wildhorse Alta. Hwy 41 Havre, MT 832 Paterson B. C. Northport, WA 841 Aldergrove British Columbia BC 13 Lynden, WA Boundary Bay British Columbia Boundary Bay Point Roberts, WA 840 Douglas British Columbia Peace Arch Blaine, WA 829 Flathead British Columbia Trail Creek, 817 Huntingdon British Columbia BC11 Huntingdon Sumas, WA 813 Pacific Highway British Columbia BC 15 Pacific Highway Blaine, WA 824 Roosville British Columbia Roosville Eureka, MT 822 Rykerts British Columbia Porthill, ID 816 Cascade British Columbia Hwy 3 Laurier, WA Grand Forks British Columbia Hwy 3 Danville, WA 818 Kingsgate British Columbia Hwy 3 Eastport, ID 835 Midway British Columbia Hwy 3 Ferry, WA 828 Nelway British Columbia Hwy 6 Metaline Falls, WA 819 Osoyoos British Columbia Hwy 97 Oroville, WA 507 Boissevain Manitoba Dunseith, ND Middleboro Manitoba Warroad, MN 506 South Junction Manitoba Roseau, MN 521 Cartwright Manitoba Hwy 5 Hansboro, ND 524 Coulter Manitoba Hwy 83 Westhope, ND 520 Crystal City Manitoba Hwy 34 Sarles, ND Hwy 75 / Manitoba 502 Emerson Highway 29 Emerson Pembina, ND Gainsborough Manitoba Hwy 256 Antler, ND Goodlands Manitoba Hwy 21 Carbury, ND 503 Gretna Manitoba Hwy 30 Neche, ND Haskett Manitoba Hwy 32 Walhalla, ND 522 Lena Manitoba Hwy 18 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Transit
    Gear boxes and couplings Heavy-duty braking systems Subway cars, commuter cars or trolley cars. Rockwell Our wedge, cam, disc or spring brakes, actuated by air has the capability to supply the type of gear box or or hydraulic pressure, will stop most any vehicle you coupling you specify. Or, we can custom design "special start. Add our Skid-Trol® wheel anti-lock system and drives" for unique vehicle applications. you have a single source for most all heavy-duty stopping requirements. line From Concept to Reality That's what cities like San Francisco, Boston, New York, Chicago and Washington, the Dallas/Fort Worth and Seattle/Tacoma airports, Disney World, the Toronto Zoo and others have done. We can put our 50 years' mass transit experience, the resources of the world's largest independent Automotive Technical Center, and a broad line of components for rail cars, buses and guideway vehicles to work for you, too. Contact Mass Transit Sales, Automotive Operations, Rockwell International, 2135 W. Maple Road, Troy, MI 48084. Rail trucks The broadest line of axles We make complete rail trucks or components for The mass transit industry uses our steering, driving locomotives, freight cars, subway cars, and commuter and trailer axles — single and tandem — in a variety of cars. Or if you have a special rail vehicle in mind, we'll configurations for highway and guideway vehicles. Plus help you make it go. custom design axles for virtually every mass transpor- tation application. Rockwell International ...where science gets down to business ALMEX Passenger self service. This is one wayof looking at it.
    [Show full text]
  • Help Card.Pdf
    St. Clair County Help Card Emergency Services Employment Assistance Police/Fire/EMS 911 Experience Works (ages 55+) (810) 966-3306 Poison Control (800) 222-1222 Michigan Works (810) 966-3300 Blue Water Safe Horizons - Crisis Line (810) 985-5538 Michigan Rehabilitation Services (810) 982-8571 Child /Adult Protective Services (855) 444-3911 The Unemployment Insurance Agency (866) 500-0017 National Suicide Hotline (800) 273-8255 Work First (810) 966-3347 Ok 2 Say - School Safety Tip Line (855) 565-2729 Workforce Development Agency www.mighigan.gov/wda Alcohol/Addiction/Substance Abuse Education Catholic Charities of Southeast Michigan (810) 987-9100 St. Clair County RESA - Administration (810) 364-8990 Celebrate Recovery (810)479-6311 Blue Water Middle College (810) 989-5841 Center for Human Resources (810) 985-5168 TEC Center (810) 455-1010 Cornell Center (810) 987-9500 Virtual Learning Academy (810) 364-1362 Eastwood Clinics (810) 329-5340 Woodlands Developmental Center (810) 455-1011 Families Against Narcotics (810) 434-8687 Adult Education The Harbor for Youth (810) 982-8584 Baker College (810) 985-7000 Huron House (Alcohol/Drug Testing Services) (810) 984-8781 Harrison Center (high school completion & GED) (810) 455-0029 Kairos Healthcare (989) 792-5905 St. Clair County Community College (810) 984-3881 Narcotics Anonymous (NA) (877) 338-1188 Early Childhood Education Professional Counseling Center (810) 984-4202 Early On (810) 364-8990 Sacred Heart Rehabilitation Center (888) 802-7472 Head Start/ Early Head Start (810) 982-8541 St. Clair County Community Mental Health (810) 987-6911 HUB (810) 985-1970 Toll Free (888) 225-4447 Great Start Collaborative (810) 455-4397 Great Start Parent Coalition (810) 455-4443 Child & Family Services Great Start Home Visiting (866) 735-8990 Great Start Readiness Program (810) 364-8990 Great Start to Quality (877) 614-7328 Blue Water Pregnancy Care Center (810) 985-4673 School Districts Kids in Distress (810) 326-4505 St.
    [Show full text]
  • ST. CLAIR TUNNEL HAER No. MI-67 (St
    ST. CLAIR TUNNEL HAER No. MI-67 (St. Clair River Tunnel) Under the St. Clair River, between Port Huron, HA^l: f> . Michigan, and Sarnia, Canada ih \ .~~; (~ ; Port Huron ' '*■ • ''-•■- H ■ St. Clair County *7U^--fQH\jt Michigan ''/[ • PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service Northeast Region U.S. Custom House 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 # HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD ST. CLAIR TUNNEL (St. Clair River Tunnel) HAER No. MI-67 Location: Under the St. Clair River, between Port Huron, Michigan, and Sarnia, Canada TJTM: A: 17.382520.4757260 C: 17.385690.4756920 B: 17.382470.47 57150 D: 17.385650.4756S20 Quad: Port Huron, MI, 1; 2 4,0 0 0 Dates of Construction: 1888-1891; 1907-1908; 1958 Engineer: Joseph Hobson and others Present Owner: St Clair Tunnel Company, 1333 Brewery Park Boulevard, Detroit, Michigan 48207-9998 Present Use; Railroad tunnel Significance: The St. Clair Tunnel was the first full- sized subaqueous tunnel built in North America. Joseph Hobson, the Chief Engineer, successfully combined three significant new technologies—a tunnel shield driven by hydraulic rams; a cast iron tunnel lining; and the use of a compressed air environment. This tunnel eliminated a major bottleneck in the rail transportation system linking the American midwest with its eastern markets. Project Information; This documentation is the result of a Memorandum of Agreement, among the Michigan State Historic Preservation Office, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Detroit District and the Canadian National North America Railroad as a mitigative measure before the closing of the tunnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor and Members of Council From
    Municipality Of Chatham-Kent Infrastructure and Engineering Services Public Works To: Mayor and Members of Council From: Ryan Brown, P.Eng. Director of Public Works Gabriel Clarke, MES, BA Environmental Planner I Date: April 28, 2021 Subject: Amendments to Long Grass and Weeds By-Law 56-2020 Recommendations It is recommended that: 1. The attached by-law to regulate and prohibit long grasses and weeds be approved. 2. By-Law Number 56-2020, the former bylaw to regulate and prohibit long grasses and weeds be repealed. Background At the September 14, 2020 meeting, Council approved the following Motion: “Chatham-Kent’s Long Grass and Weed By-law (By-law # 56-2020) was introduced to implement a minimum outdoor landscaping maintenance standard that prohibits overgrown grasses and weeds on private properties. Similar to long grass by-laws in other communities, Chatham-Kent’s By-law maintains community aesthetics and prevents landscape abandonment. The by-law applies to all grass and weed species listed in the Government of Ontario’s Publication 505 ‘Ontario Weeds’ and requires that they be kept under 20cm in height through regular mowing, or be subject to enforcement. However, it is also a community strategic objective to enhance natural areas in the Municipality and there is a conflict that exists with the long grass by-law in meeting these objectives. Specifically, there are challenges that the current grass cutting by- law poses with respect to legitimate tall grass prairie environmental naturalization activities on private lands and despite the positive intent of the by-law, the way it is currently written can be used to reverse these environmental stewardship activities that the Municipality has otherwise identified as desirable.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket 85 Port Huron-Sarnia Detroit
    I. ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE WASH I N GTO N The International Joint Commission, United States and Canada, Washington, D .C. , U.S .A., and Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. I .. .d Sirs: As a result of expand.ing industrial and other activities along the international boundary of the United States and Canada, the Governments of both countries have been increasingly aware of the problem of air pollution affecting citizens and property interests on either side of the boundary. In particular, Governments have received representations that citizens and property in the vicinities of Detroit-Windsor and Port Huron-Sarnia are being subjected to detrimental quantities of air pollutants crossing the boundary. The problem of air pollution in the vicinity of the cities of Windsor and Detroit was the subject of a Joint Reference to the Commission dated January 12, 1949. The Commission was requested to report whether the air over, or in the vicinity of, Detroit and Windsor was being polluted by smoke, soot, fly ash or other impurities in quantities detrimental to the ..i public health, safety or general welfare of citizens 1 or property on either side of the boundary. In the event of an affirmative answer, the Commission was ..., i asked to indicate the extent to which vessels plying '1 I the waters of the Detroit River were contributing to this pollution and what other major factors were responsible and to what extent. m-F?. The Commission, in its final report to Governments RCi;ilpn,. 0-f May 1960.,,.repliedin the affirmative to the first question and listed various industrial, domestic and 1 'I 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    People Before Freight On-time trains on host railroads 3 LATEST REPORT CARD SIGNALS NEW GOLDEN AGE OF ON-TIME TRAINS 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF A 3 Union Pacific A 4 CSX A 5 Canadian National A 6 Norfolk Southern A Average grade for all host railroads: A 4 Amtrak National Network Passengers Continue to Experience Poor On-Time Performance 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF B 3 Union Pacific B- 4 CSX B- 5 Canadian National D- 6 Norfolk Southern F Average grade for all host railroads: C 5 Grading National Network routes on OTP 17 of 28 State-Supported Services Fail Class I Freight Percentage of trains on‐time State‐Supported Trains Route Host Railroads within 15 minutes Pass = 80% on‐time Hiawatha CP 96% Keystone (other hosts) 91% Capitol Corridor UP 89% New York ‐ Albany (other hosts) 89% Carl Sandburg / Illinois Zephyr BNSF 88% Ethan Allen Express CP 87% PASS Pere Marquette CSX, NS 84% Missouri River Runner UP 83% Springfield Shuttles (other hosts) 82% Downeaster (other hosts) 81% Hoosier State CSX 80% Pacific Surfliner BNSF, UP 78% Lincoln Service CN, UP 76% Blue Water NS, CN 75% Roanoke NS 75% Piedmont NS 74% Richmond / Newport News / Norfolk CSX, NS 74% San Joaquins BNSF, UP 73% Pennsylvanian NS 71% Adirondack CN, CP 70% FAIL New York ‐ Niagara Falls CSX 70% Vermonter (other hosts) 67% Cascades BNSF, UP 64% Maple Leaf CSX 64% Wolverine NS, CN 60% Heartland Flyer BNSF 58% Carolinian CSX, NS 51% Illini / Saluki CN 37% 6 Grading National Network routes on OTP 14 of 15 Long Distance Services Fail Class I Freight Percentage of trains on‐time Long
    [Show full text]