DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1909.13197V4 [Astro-Ph.CO] 31 Jul 2020 Limit (Σav 1/V)[3,5,7,9, 10] and P-Wave Annihilation Consider

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1909.13197V4 [Astro-Ph.CO] 31 Jul 2020 Limit (Σav 1/V)[3,5,7,9, 10] and P-Wave Annihilation Consider Effective J -factors for Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with velocity-dependent annihilation Kimberly K. Boddy,1 Jason Kumar,2 Andrew B. Pace,3, 4 Jack Runburg,2 and Louis E. Strigari5 1Department of Physics & Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA 2Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA 4McWilliams Center for Cosmology, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA 5Department of Physics and Astronomy, Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA We calculate the effective J-factors, which determine the strength of indirect detection signals from dark matter annihilation, for 25 dwarf spheroidal galaxies (dSphs). We consider several well-motivated assumptions for the relative velocity dependence of the dark matter annihilation 2 4 cross section: σAv: s-wave (velocity independent), p-wave (σAv v ), d-wave (σAv v ), and / / Sommerfeld-enhancement in the Coulomb limit (σAv 1=v). As a result we provide the largest and most updated sample of J-factors for velocity-dependent/ annihilation models. For each scenario, we use Fermi-LAT gamma-ray data to constrain the annihilation cross section. Due to the assumptions made in our gamma-ray data analysis, our bounds are comparable to previous bounds on both the p-wave and Sommerfeld-enhanced cross sections using dSphs. Our bounds on the d-wave cross section are the first such bounds using indirect detection data. I. INTRODUCTION as for p-wave annihilation without assuming a Maxwell- Boltzmann distribution. One of the most promising strategies for the indirect detection of dark matter (DM) is the search for gamma We use a Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) density pro- rays arising from DM annihilation in dwarf spheroidal file for the dSph halos and assume that the DM velocity galaxies (dSphs). These targets are especially useful be- distribution is related to the density profile by the Ed- cause they have large dark-to-luminous mass ratios, large dington inversion formula [11]. Under the approximation expected DM annihilation rates, and no standard astro- that a dSph spans a small angular size (which is well jus- physical sources of gamma rays. tified for all dSphs we consider), we employ previous work The flux of gamma rays arising from DM annihilation that has determined the effective J-factor in terms of the depends on the properties of the astrophysical source scale density, scale radius, and distance to the halo for through the J-factor. Under the standard assumption all annihilation models we consider [6]. We then estimate of velocity-independent DM annihilation, the J-factor is these parameters by fitting the associated velocity disper- determined by the DM density profile of the dSph. If, sion to stellar data and present results for the effective however, the annihilation cross section is velocity de- J-factors, integrated over various angular cones. pendent, the calculation of the J-factor must account for this velocity dependence by incorporating the full DM velocity distribution [1{8]. Previous works have Finally, we use the MADHAT code [12] to perform a estimated these effective J-factors for some dSphs, us- stacked analysis of Fermi-LAT gamma-ray data [13] for ing a variety of techniques, under the assumptions of these targets. We obtain bounds on the DM annihila- Sommerfeld-enhanced DM annihilation in the Coulomb tion cross section for each of the annihilation models we arXiv:1909.13197v4 [astro-ph.CO] 31 Jul 2020 limit (σAv 1=v)[3,5,7,9, 10] and p-wave annihilation consider. Limits on Sommerfeld-enhanced annihilation 2 / (σAv v )[4,9]. / and p-wave annihilation have been previously obtained In this work, we calculate the effective J-factors using a smaller set of dSphs, with effective J-factors de- for 25 dSphs of the Milky Way (MW), under well- termined using different methodologies [9, 14]. motivated annihilation models: s-wave, p-wave, d-wave, and Sommerfeld-enhancement in the Coulomb limit. We present the first effective J-factor analysis conducted for This paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we de- many of these dSphs under certain annihilation scenar- termine the effective J-factors for our set of 25 dSphs, ios. In particular, for Sagittarius II, we perform the first describing our methodology in detail and comparing to J-factor analysis for any annihilation model. Moreover, previous results. In Sec. III, we use these effective J- we are the first to our knowledge to calculate effective factors, along with Fermi-LAT data, to set bounds on the J-factors of any dSph for d-wave annihilation, as well DM annihilation cross section. We conclude in Sec.IV. 2 II. EFFECTIVE J-FACTORS through an interaction that respects Minimal Fla- vor Violation. In this case, annihilation from an s-wave state is chirality-suppressed, and the p-wave We express the DM annihilation cross section as σAv = initial state is forbidden by symmetry of the wave (σAv)0S(v=c), where (σAv)0 is a quantity independent of the relative velocity v of the annihilating particles. The function [17, 18]. differential photon flux arising from DM annihilation in Following Ref. [8], we assume that the DM velocity any astrophysical target is distribution is a function of only two dimensionful pa- rameters: the scale radius r and the scale density ρ . d2Φ (σ v) dN s s A 0 Furthermore, we take the limit θ 1, where θ r =D = 2 JS(Ω) ; (1) 0 0 s dΩ dEγ 8πmX dEγ is the characteristic angular scale of the target.≡ Under these assumptions, the effective J-factor for a given an- where dN=dE is the photon spectrum produced per an- γ nihilation model parameter n may thus be written as nihilation and mX is the DM particle mass. We have as- sumed that the DM particle is its own antiparticle. The 2 n=2 ~ 2 4πGN ρsrs ~ ~ effective J-factor, J (Ω), encodes the information about JS(n)(θ) = 2ρ rs JS(n)(θ) ; (3) S s c2 the DM distribution in the target. For a target with a ~ ~ central potential and DM particles on isotropic orbits, where θ θ/θ0 and J~S(θ) is the scale-free angular dis- the DM velocity distribution f(r; vp) is simply a function tribution≡ that depends only on n and on the functional of the distance from the center of the target and the ve- form of the velocity distribution, but not on the param- locity of the DM particle [11]. With this simplification, eters ρs, rs, or D. Deviations from this result scale as the effective J-factor is (θ2), which is negligible for the dSphs we consider. O 0 Z 1 Z Z Therefore, to determine the effective J-factor for any 3 3 JS(θ) = d` d v1 d v2 S( v1 v2 =c) dSph, it is only necessary to know the halo parame- 0 j − j ters (ρs, rs, and D) and scale-free angular distribution f [r(`; θ); v1] f [r(`; θ); v2] ; (2) ~ ~ × JS(n)(θ). The latter has been previously calculated for −1 −2 where ` is the distance along the line of sight and θ is an NFW density profile ρ(r) = ρs(r=rs) (1 + r=rs) the angle between the light of sight and the line to the and for all values of n discussed above [8]. We make the center of the target. The radial distance from the halo same assumptions as Ref. [8] about the DM velocity dis- center can be recast via r2(`; θ) = `2 + D2 2`D cos θ, tribution, which is related to the density profile through where D is the distance to the center of the− target. the Eddington inversion formula. Using these results, we We consider DM annihilation models of the form are able to determine the various effective J-factors for S(v=c) = (v=c)n, for integer n. In particular, we focus individual dSphs if we know ρs, rs, and D. on the following possible scenarios: In the following subsections, we describe our procedure of determining these parameters and present the resulting (i) n = 1: Sommerfeld-enhanced annihilation in effective J-factors for specific dSphs. the Coulomb− limit [15, 16]. If the annihila- tion proceeds through a heavy mediator, then −1 (σv)0(2παX )(v=c) , where αX is the DM self cou- A. Halo parameters pling. We fix αX = 1=2π. We use the halo parameter analysis, originally pre- (ii) n = 0: s-wave velocity-independent annihilation. sented in Ref. [19], which calculated J-factors for 41 This scenario is the one that is usually considered. dSphs. We consider the subset of 22 dSphs that have (iii) n = 2: p-wave annihilation. This scenario is rel- confidently measured velocity dispersions and are MW evant if DM is a Majorana fermion, which annihi- satellites. The general methodology for determining halo lates to Standard Model fermion/antifermion pairs parameters in dSphs is through a spherical Jeans anal- through an interaction that respects Minimal Flavor ysis [20{22]. The analysis involves solving the spheri- Violation. In this case, annihilation from an s-wave cal Jeans equation (which relates the velocity dispersion, initial state is chirality-suppressed. As another ex- stellar anisotropy, and gravitational potential) for a set ample, this scenario is relevant if DM is a fermion of halo parameters, projecting it into the line-of-sight di- (Dirac or Majorana) that annihilates through a rection, and comparing the line-of-sight dispersion to ob- scalar current coupling, regardless of the final state served stellar kinematics.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spatial Distribution of Galactic Globular Clusters: Distance Uncertainties and Dynamical Effects
    Juliana Crestani Ribeiro de Souza Spatial Distribution of Galactic Globular Clusters: Distance Uncertainties and Dynamical Effects Porto Alegre 2017 Juliana Crestani Ribeiro de Souza Spatial Distribution of Galactic Globular Clusters: Distance Uncertainties and Dynamical Effects Dissertação elaborada sob orientação do Prof. Dr. Eduardo Luis Damiani Bica, co- orientação do Prof. Dr. Charles José Bon- ato e apresentada ao Instituto de Física da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul em preenchimento do requisito par- cial para obtenção do título de Mestre em Física. Porto Alegre 2017 Acknowledgements To my parents, who supported me and made this possible, in a time and place where being in a university was just a distant dream. To my dearest friends Elisabeth, Robert, Augusto, and Natália - who so many times helped me go from "I give up" to "I’ll try once more". To my cats Kira, Fen, and Demi - who lazily join me in bed at the end of the day, and make everything worthwhile. "But, first of all, it will be necessary to explain what is our idea of a cluster of stars, and by what means we have obtained it. For an instance, I shall take the phenomenon which presents itself in many clusters: It is that of a number of lucid spots, of equal lustre, scattered over a circular space, in such a manner as to appear gradually more compressed towards the middle; and which compression, in the clusters to which I allude, is generally carried so far, as, by imperceptible degrees, to end in a luminous center, of a resolvable blaze of light." William Herschel, 1789 Abstract We provide a sample of 170 Galactic Globular Clusters (GCs) and analyse its spatial distribution properties.
    [Show full text]
  • YMCA-1: a New Remote Star Cluster of the Milky Way?∗
    Draft version July 23, 2021 Typeset using LATEX manuscript style in AASTeX631 YMCA-1: a new remote star cluster of the Milky Way?∗ M. Gatto ,1, 2 V. Ripepi,1 M. Bellazzini ,3 M. Tosi,3 C. Tortora,1 M. Cignoni,1, 4, 5 M. Spavone ,1 M. Dall'ora,1 G. Clementini,3 F. Cusano,3 G. Longo,2 I. Musella,1 M. Marconi,1 and P. Schipani1 1INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Via Moiariello 16, 80131, Naples, Italy 2Dept. of Physics, University of Naples Federico II, C.U. Monte Sant'Angelo, Via Cinthia, 80126, Naples, Italy 3INAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio, Via Gobetti 93/3, I-40129 Bologna, Italy 4Physics Departement, University of Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo, 3, I-56127 Pisa, Italy 5INFN, Largo B. Pontecorvo 3, 56127, Pisa, Italy ABSTRACT We report the possible discovery of a new stellar system (YMCA-1), identified during a search for small scale overdensities in the photometric data of the YMCA survey. The object's projected position lies on the periphery of the Large Magellanic Cloud about 13◦ apart from its center. The most likely interpretation of its color-magnitude diagram, as well as of its integrated properties, is that YMCA-1 may be an old and remote star cluster of the Milky Way at a distance of 100 kpc from the Galactic center. If this scenario could be confirmed, then the cluster would be significantly fainter and more compact than most of the known star clusters residing in the extreme outskirts of arXiv:2107.10312v1 [astro-ph.GA] 21 Jul 2021 the Galactic halo, but quite similar to Laevens 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Eight Ultra-Faint Galaxy Candidates Discovered in Year Two of the Dark Energy Survey A
    The Astrophysical Journal, 813:109 (20pp), 2015 November 10 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/109 © 2015. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. EIGHT ULTRA-FAINT GALAXY CANDIDATES DISCOVERED IN YEAR TWO OF THE DARK ENERGY SURVEY A. Drlica-Wagner1, K. Bechtol2,3, E. S. Rykoff4,5, E. Luque6,7, A. Queiroz6,7,Y.-Y.Mao4,5,8, R. H. Wechsler4,5,8, J. D. Simon9, B. Santiago6,7, B. Yanny1, E. Balbinot7,10, S. Dodelson1,11, A. Fausti Neto7, D. J. James12,T.S.Li13, M. A. G. Maia7,14, J. L. Marshall13, A. Pieres6,7, K. Stringer13, A. R. Walker12, T. M. C. Abbott12, F. B. Abdalla15,16, S. Allam1, A. Benoit-Lévy15, G. M. Bernstein17, E. Bertin18,19, D. Brooks15, E. Buckley-Geer1, D. L. Burke4,5, A. Carnero Rosell7,14, M. Carrasco Kind20,21, J. Carretero22,23, M. Crocce22, L. N. da Costa7,14, S. Desai24,25, H. T. Diehl1, J. P. Dietrich24,25, P. Doel15,T.F.Eifler17,26, A. E. Evrard27,28, D. A. Finley1, B. Flaugher1, P. Fosalba22, J. Frieman1,11, E. Gaztanaga22, D. W. Gerdes28, D. Gruen29,30, R. A. Gruendl20,21, G. Gutierrez1, K. Honscheid31,32, K. Kuehn33, N. Kuropatkin1, O. Lahav15, P. Martini31,34, R. Miquel23,35, B. Nord1, R. Ogando7,14, A. A. Plazas26, K. Reil5, A. Roodman4,5, M. Sako17, E. Sanchez36, V. Scarpine1, M. Schubnell28, I. Sevilla-Noarbe20,36, R. C. Smith12, M. Soares-Santos1, F. Sobreira1,7, E. Suchyta31,32, M. E. C. Swanson21, G. Tarle28, D. Tucker1, V. Vikram37, W. Wester1, Y. Zhang28, and J.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaia EDR3 View on Galactic Globular Clusters
    MNRAS 505, 5978–6002 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1475 Advance Access publication 2021 May 24 Gaia EDR3 view on galactic globular clusters Eugene Vasiliev 1,2‹ and Holger Baumgardt 3 1Institute of Astronomy, Madingley road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK 2Lebedev Physical Institute, Leninsky prospekt 53, Moscow 119991, Russia 3School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia Accepted 2021 May 17. Received 2021 May 11; in original form 2021 March 17 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/505/4/5978/6283730 by UQ Library user on 09 August 2021 ABSTRACT We use the data from Gaia Early Data Release 3 (EDR3) to study the kinematic properties of Milky Way globular clusters. We measure the mean parallaxes and proper motions (PM) for 170 clusters, determine the PM dispersion profiles for more than 100 clusters, uncover rotation signatures in more than 20 objects, and find evidence for radial or tangential PM anisotropy in a dozen richest clusters. At the same time, we use the selection of cluster members to explore the reliability and limitations of the Gaia catalogue itself. We find that the formal uncertainties on parallax and PM are underestimated by 10−20 per cent in dense central regions even for stars that pass numerous quality filters. We explore the spatial covariance function of systematic errors, and determine a lower limit on the uncertainty of average parallaxes and PM at the level 0.01 mas and 0.025 mas yr−1 , respectively. Finally, a comparison of mean parallaxes of clusters with distances from various literature sources suggests that the parallaxes for stars with G>13 (after applying the zero-point correction suggested by Lindegren et al.) are overestimated by ∼ 0.01 ± 0.003 mas.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1508.03622V2 [Astro-Ph.GA] 6 Nov 2015
    SLAC-PUB-16631 Eight Ultra-faint Galaxy Candidates Discovered in Year Two of the Dark Energy Survey 1; 2;3; 4;5 6;7 6;7 8;4;5 A. Drlica-Wagner ∗, K. Bechtol y, E. S. Rykoff , E. Luque , A. Queiroz , Y.-Y. Mao , R. H. Wechsler8;4;5, J. D. Simon9, B. Santiago6;7, B. Yanny1, E. Balbinot10;7, S. Dodelson1;11, A. Fausti Neto7, D. J. James12, T. S. Li13, M. A. G. Maia7;14, J. L. Marshall13, A. Pieres6;7, K. Stringer13, A. R. Walker12, T. M. C. Abbott12, F. B. Abdalla15;16, S. Allam1, A. Benoit-L´evy15, G. M. Bernstein17, E. Bertin18;19, D. Brooks15, E. Buckley-Geer1, D. L. Burke4;5, A. Carnero Rosell7;14, M. Carrasco Kind20;21, J. Carretero22;23, M. Crocce22, L. N. da Costa7;14, S. Desai24;25, H. T. Diehl1, J. P. Dietrich24;25, P. Doel15, T. F. Eifler17;26, A. E. Evrard27;28, D. A. Finley1, B. Flaugher1, P. Fosalba22, J. Frieman1;11, E. Gaztanaga22, D. W. Gerdes28, D. Gruen29;30, R. A. Gruendl20;21, G. Gutierrez1, K. Honscheid31;32, K. Kuehn33, N. Kuropatkin1, O. Lahav15, P. Martini31;34, R. Miquel35;23, B. Nord1, R. Ogando7;14, A. A. Plazas26, K. Reil5, A. Roodman4;5, M. Sako17, E. Sanchez36, V. Scarpine1, M. Schubnell28, I. Sevilla-Noarbe36;20, R. C. Smith12, M. Soares-Santos1, F. Sobreira1;7, E. Suchyta31;32, M. E. C. Swanson21, G. Tarle28, D. Tucker1, V. Vikram37, W. Wester1, Y. Zhang28, J. Zuntz38 (The DES Collaboration) arXiv:1508.03622v2 [astro-ph.GA] 6 Nov 2015 This material is based upon work supported by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ETD-5608-032-LIN-9413.13.Pdf (3.426Mb)
    TESTING THE DARK SECTOR VERSUS MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS IN COSMOLOGY by Weikang Lin APPROVED BY SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Dr. Mustapha Ishak-Boushaki, Chair Dr. Robert Glosser Dr. Michael Kesden Dr. Lindsay J. King Dr. Kaloyan Penev Copyright c 2018 Weikang Lin All rights reserved TESTING THE DARK SECTOR VERSUS MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS IN COSMOLOGY by WEIKANG LIN DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The University of Texas at Dallas in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHYSICS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS August 2018 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I want to say thanks to many people. I am hoping I would not leave out anyone. First I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Mustapha Ishak for the past six years of support and advise for my graduate study. I am thankful that Dr. Ishak encouraged me to explore various sci- entific ideas. Dr. Ishak has provided significant help during my search for postdoctoral positions. I would also like to thank my dissertation committee including Dr. Mustapha Ishak, Dr. Robert Glosser, Dr. Michael Kesden, Dr. Lindsay King and Dr. Kaloyan Penev. I thank Dr. Glosser and Dr. Penev for providing advise about my career decision. I want to sincerely express my grati- tude to Dr. Michael Kesden and Dr. Lindsay King, for their help during my search of postdoctoral position. They both have pointed out to me many postdoctoral opportunities, especially the post- doctoral position at NCSU pointed out by Dr. Kesden. I owe a special thanks to Dr. Xingang Chen, who is not only one of my previous dissertation committee members but also my friend.
    [Show full text]
  • Astro2020 Science White Paper Searching for Sources of Tev Particle Dark Matter in the Southern Hemisphere
    Astro2020 Science White Paper Searching for Sources of TeV Particle Dark Matter in the Southern Hemisphere Thematic Areas: Planetary Systems Star and Planet Formation Formation and Evolution of Compact Objects 3Cosmology and Fundamental Physics Stars and Stellar Evolution Resolved Stellar Populations and their Environments Galaxy Evolution Multi-Messenger Astronomy and Astrophysics Principal Author: Name: Andrea Albert Institution: Los Alamos National Laboratory Email: [email protected] Phone: 505-665-7076 Co-authors: K.S.Caballero-Mora (UNACH, Mexico),´ P. M. Chadwick (Durham University, UK) B. L. Dingus (Los Alamos National Lab), K. L. Engel (University of Maryland), J. A. Goodman (University of Maryland), T. Greenshaw (University of Liverpool, UK), J. P. Harding (Los Alamos National Laboratory), P. Huentemeyer (Michigan Tech), J. S. Lapington (University of Leicester, UK), J. Lundeen (Michigan State University), J. Mart´ınez-Castro (Centro de Investigacion´ en Computacion-IPN,´ Mexico),´ M. U. Nisa (University of Rochester),H. Schoorlemmer (Max-Planck-Institut fur¨ Kerphysik, Heidelberg Germany), K. Tollefson (Michigan State University, USA), A. Viana (Instituto de F´ısica de Sao˜ Carlos, Universidade de Sao˜ Paulo) A. Zepeda (Cinvestav) Abstract: Evidence suggests that the majority of the mass in the Universe is dark matter. Many promising models hypothesize that dark matter is a particle that can annihilate or decay and produce secondary gamma rays. Several searches have been performed by GeV and TeV gamma-ray experiments, none of which has detected a definitive signal. The Southern Hemisphere is home to many key dark matter targets, like the dwarf galaxy Reticulum II and the Fornax galaxy cluster. So far, only a few Southern Hemisphere targets have been observed by the current H.E.S.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Milky Way Globular Clusters and Satellites in the Gaia
    Dynamics of Milky Way globular clusters and satellite galaxies in the Gaia era globular clusters satellite galaxies 1 10 100 distance Eugene Vasiliev Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge IAG-USP seminar, 1 September 2021 Gaia mission: the Milky Way in motion Gaia mission timeline Dec 2013 launch Sep 2016 DR1: G-band photometry for > 109 sources, astrometry for 2×106 bright stars previously observed by Hipparcos (1990s) 9 Apr 2018 DR2: G, GBP , GRP photometry for 1:4 × 10 sources, astrometry (parallaxes & proper motions) for 1:3 × 109 stars, line-of-sight velocity for 7 × 106 bright stars Jun 2019 end of nominal 5-year mission; extended for a few years Dec 2020 Early DR3: improved photometry and astrometry for 1:5 × 109 sources 1h 2022 DR3: astrometry/photometry remains the same, line-of-sight velocity for ∼ 3 × 107 stars, mean BP, RP and RVS spectra, astrometric solutions for non-single stars, lightcurves for variable sources ∼2024 end of extended mission (limited by onboard fuel supply) 2024 ? DR4: full analysis of the nominal 5-year mission data; improved astrometry, photometry, spectroscopy; individual epoch data ? DR5: full analysis of the extended mission, final catalogue. Gaia astrometric precision PM uncertainty [mas/yr] µ & 0:01 mas/yr in EDR3 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 −3=2 µ / T : 6 expect 2:5× improvement in DR4 8 1 mas/yr = 4:7 km/s × (D=1 kpc) σ ∼ 2 − 10 km/s in clusters 10 NGC 5272 (M 3), D=10 kpc 12 12 14 14 G magnitude 16 16 G 18 18 20 20 systematic error 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50 100 g-r velocity uncertainty
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1507.07564V2 [Astro-Ph.GA] 31 Oct 2015 Ofidtee Ni Hn Lsv Bet.A H Turn As the Such at Surveys CCD Large Was Objects
    Draft version November 3, 2015 A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 SAGITTARIUS II, DRACO II AND LAEVENS 3: THREE NEW MILKY WAY SATELLITES DISCOVERED IN THE PAN-STARRS 1 3π SURVEY Benjamin P. M. Laevens1,2, Nicolas F. Martin1,2, Edouard J. Bernard3, Edward F. Schlafly2, Branimir Sesar2, Hans-Walter Rix2, Eric F. Bell4, Annette M. N. Ferguson3, Colin T. Slater4, William E. Sweeney5, Rosemary F. G. Wyse6, Avon P. Huxor7, William S. Burgett9, Kenneth C. Chambers5, Peter W. Draper8, Klaus A. Hodapp5, Nicholas Kaiser5, Eugene A. Magnier5, Nigel Metcalfe8, John L. Tonry5, Richard J. Wainscoat5, Christopher Waters5 Draft version November 3, 2015 ABSTRACT We present the discovery of three new Milky Way satellites from our search for compact stellar overdensities in the photometric catalog of the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System 1 (Pan-STARRS 1, or PS1) 3π survey. The first satellite, Laevens 3, is located at a heliocentric distance of d = 67 ± 3 kpc. With a total magnitude of MV = −4.4 ± 0.3 and a half-light radius rh = 7 ± 2 pc, its properties resemble those of outer halo globular clusters. The second system, Draco II/Laevens 4 (Dra II), is a closer and fainter satellite (d ∼ 20 kpc, MV = −2.9 ± 0.8), whose +8 uncertain size (rh = 19−6 pc) renders its classification difficult without kinematic information; it could either be a faint and extended globular cluster or a faint and compact dwarf galaxy. The third satellite, Sagittarius II/Laevens 5 (Sgr II), has an ambiguous nature as it is either the most +9 compact dwarf galaxy or the most extended globular cluster in its luminosity range (rh = 37−8 pc and MV = −5.2 ± 0.4).
    [Show full text]
  • Rosemary F.G. Wyse Curriculum Vitae
    Rosemary F.G. Wyse Curriculum Vitae Positions Held: Jul 1993 - present Full Professor, The Johns Hopkins University Jul 1990 - Jun 1993 Associate Professor, The Johns Hopkins University Jan 1988 - Jun 1990 Assistant Professor, The Johns Hopkins University Aug 1986 - Jan 1988 University of California President's Fellow, UC Berkeley Jan - July 1986 Postdoctoral Fellow, SpaceTelescope Science Institute Aug - Dec 1985 University of California President's Fellow, UC Berkeley Sep 1983 - Jul 1985 Parisot Postdoctoral Fellow at UC Berkeley Sep1982 - Aug 1983 Lindemann Fellow of the English Speaking Union of the Commonwealth; Princeton University and UC Berkeley Education 1978-82: University of Cambridge, Institute of Astronomy. Degree : Ph.D. (Supervisor : Bernard Jones); awarded April 1983. 1977-78: University of Cambridge, Department of Applied Mathematics. Degree : Part Three of the Mathematics Tripos (with Distinction). 1974-77: University of London, Queen Mary College, Physics Department. Degree : B.Sc (First Class Honours) in Physics with Astrophysics. Prizes & Honors 2017 • Elected Fellow of the American Physical Society 2016: • Elected Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science • Dirk Brouwer award from the Division of Dynamical Astronomy, AAS • Blauuw Professor and Lecturer, University of Groningen (The Netherlands) • Visiting Professor, Leverhulme Trust, held at University of Edinburgh (UK) 2015: • Distinguished Visitor, Australia National University, Canberra (Australia) • Hunstead Visitor, University of Sydney, Institute for Astronomy 2009: • Distinguished Visitor, Scottish Universities Physics Alliance 2002: • Hilary term. Elected Visiting Fellow of New College, Oxford (UK) • Trinity term. Elected Keeley Fellow, Wadham College, Oxford (UK) 1990-1992: • Fellowship from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. 1989: • Teaching Fellowship from the Eli Lilly Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Year Book 2015/16 Bibliographies
    YEAR BOOK 2015/16 BIBLIOGRAPHIES THE DEPARTMENT OF EMBRYOLOGY Anderson JL, Carten JD, Farber SA. Using fluorescent lipids in live zebrafish larvae: From imaging whole animal physiology to subcellular lipid trafficking. Methods Cell Biol. 2016;133:165-78. doi: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 May 9. PubMed PMID: 27263413. Chen H, Zheng X, Xiao D, Zheng Y. Age-associated de-repression of retrotransposons in the Drosophila fat body, its potential cause and consequence. Aging Cell. 2016 Jun;15(3):542-52. doi: 10.1111/acel.12465. Epub 2016 Apr 12. PubMed PMID: 27072046; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4854910. Craddock EM, Gall JG, Jonas M. Hawaiian Drosophila genomes: size variation and evolutionary expansions. Genetica. 2016 Feb;144(1):107-24. doi: 10.1007/s10709-016-9882-5. Epub 2016 Jan 20. PubMed PMID: 26790663. Duboué ER, Halpern ME. Genetic and transgenic approaches to study zebrafish brain asymmetry and lateralized behavior. In Lateralized Brain Function: Methods in Human and Non-Human Species, Neuromethods 122. Eds.: G. Vallortigara and L. Rogers. Humana Press. In press. Facchin L, Duboué ER, Halpern ME. Disruption of Epithalamic Left-Right Asymmetry Increases Anxiety in Zebrafish. J Neurosci. 2015 Dec 2;35(48):15847-59. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2593-15.2015. PubMed PMID: 26631467; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4666913. Gall JG. DNA replication and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016 Aug;17(8):464. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.89. Epub 2016 Jun 29. PubMed PMID: 27353477. Gall JG. The origin of in situ hybridization - A personal history. Methods. 2016 Apr 1;98:4-9.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2102.09568V3 [Astro-Ph.GA] 12 Jul 2021 of These Systems: Sky-Plane Rotation (Bianchini Et Al
    MNRAS 505, 5978{6002 (2021) Preprint 14 July 2021 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Gaia EDR3 view on Galactic globular clusters Eugene Vasiliev1;2?, Holger Baumgardt3 1Institute of Astronomy, Madingley road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK 2Lebedev Physical Institute, Leninsky prospekt 53, Moscow, 119991, Russia 3School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, St.Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia Accepted 2021 May 17. Received 2021 May 11; in original form 2021 March 17 ABSTRACT We use the data from Gaia Early Data Release 3 (EDR3) to study the kinematic properties of Milky Way globular clusters. We measure the mean parallaxes and proper motions (PM) for 170 clusters, determine the PM dispersion profiles for more than 100 clusters, uncover rotation signatures in more than 20 objects, and find evidence for radial or tangential PM anisotropy in a dozen richest clusters. At the same time, we use the selection of cluster members to explore the reliability and limitations of the Gaia catalogue itself. We find that the formal uncertainties on parallax and PM are underestimated by 10−20% in dense central regions even for stars that pass numerous quality filters. We explore the spatial covariance function of systematic errors, and determine a lower limit on the uncertainty of average parallaxes and PM at the level 0.01 mas and 0.025 mas yr−1, respectively. Finally, a comparison of mean parallaxes of clusters with distances from various literature sources suggests that the parallaxes for stars with G > 13 (after applying the zero-point correction suggested by Lindegren et al. 2021b) are overestimated by ∼ 0:01 ± 0:003 mas.
    [Show full text]